Archive for Wisconsin

Harris vs. Trump: Who Will Better Serve Dairy Farmers and the Industry?

Who’s better for dairy farmers: Harris, with her focus on sustainability, or Trump, with his deregulation and trade deals? Our expert analysis digs in.

The dairy business plays a significant role in the American agricultural economy and is strongly rooted in rural communities. With the 2024 presidential election approaching, dairy experts, ranging from farmers to business executives, are keenly monitoring the contenders and actively participating in the discourse. The stakes are high—decisions taken now about market stability, environmental laws, and trade policies will directly influence the lives and futures of individuals who support this critical business. Will it be Harris, with her emphasis on sustainability and worker rights, or Trump, with his history of deregulation and trade deals? The importance of making informed decisions cannot be emphasized.

IssueKamala HarrisDonald Trump
Environmental RegulationsFocus on stringent environmental regulations to reduce methane emissions and combat climate change. Supports the Green New Deal, which could increase operational costs for farmers.Emphasis on deregulation, rolling back many environmental protections to lower costs for farmers. Prioritizes immediate economic concerns over long-term environmental impacts.
Labor LawsAdvocates for higher minimum wages and stronger labor protections, which could raise labor costs for dairy farmers but improve worker conditions.Supports deregulation of labor laws to maintain lower costs for farmers. Focuses on reducing undocumented immigration, affecting labor availability for the dairy sector.
Trade PoliciesAdvocates fair trade practices with stringent labor and environmental standards. Emphasizes multilateral agreements, focusing on long-term stability.Aggressively renegotiates trade deals to benefit American farmers, as seen with USMCA. Focuses on opening markets quickly, but at the risk of trade volatility.
Financial SupportTargeted subsidies for adopting sustainable practices. Promotes financial aid for organic farming and complying with environmental regulations.Broad financial relief measures like the Market Facilitation Program to offset trade impacts. Advocates tax cuts and reduced regulatory burdens.
Rural SupportSupports infrastructure improvements and sustainable development programs in rural areas. Focuses on long-term investment in rural resilience.Emphasizes immediate support through programs like the Farmers to Families Food Box Program. Advocates for expanding broadband and rural development funding.

Dairy Strongholds: Critical Swing States in 2024’s High-Stakes Election

As we approach the approaching election, it is critical to understand the strategic value of dairy farm communities in swing states. States such as Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, and Michigan are not just political battlegrounds but also home to large dairy farms. Wisconsin, frequently termed “America’s Dairyland,” significantly impacts local and national markets, producing more than 30 billion pounds of milk annually. Pennsylvania and Michigan have sizable dairy industries, contributing billions to their respective economies and sustaining thousands of employment.

Dairy producers in these states are at a crossroads regarding policy consequences from both candidates. Given their dire economic situation, their voting decisions have the potential to tip the balance in this close election. Historically, rural and agricultural populations have played critical roles in swing states, with their participation often reflecting the overall state result. The interests and preferences of dairy farmers in these areas surely increase their political relevance, making them crucial campaign targets as both candidates compete for their support.

Navigating the Milk Price Roller Coaster and Trade Turbulence: Challenges in Dairy Farming 

The dairy sector, a pillar of the American agricultural economy, confronts several severe difficulties that jeopardize its road to stability and expansion. Despite these challenges, the industry has shown remarkable resilience, instilling hope and optimism. Market volatility, a significant problem, is driven by shifting milk prices and uncertain demand. According to the USDA, dairy producers have seen substantial price fluctuations. Class III milk prices have shifted considerably in recent years, resulting in a roller-coaster impact on farm profits (USDA Report).

Trade disruptions worsen the problem. Tariffs and international trade agreements significantly impact the fortunes of dairy producers. For example, the reworking of NAFTA into the USMCA provided some respite, but persistent trade conflicts, notably with China, continue to create uncertainty. According to the International Dairy Foods Association, export tariffs may reduce US dairy exports by up to 15%, directly affecting farmers’ bottom lines (IDFA Study).

Labor shortages exacerbate the issues. Dairy production is labor-intensive, and many farms struggle to find enough workers, a challenge exacerbated by tighter immigration rules. According to the American Dairy Coalition, foreign workers account for more than half of all dairy labor, and workforce shortages threaten to reduce production efficiency and raise operating costs.

These challenges often create a ripple effect across the sector. For instance, market volatility may strain financial resources, making it harder to retain employees. Conversely, restrictive trade policies may limit market prospects, increasing economic stress and complicating labor management. In the face of these issues, dairy farmers and industry stakeholders must take the lead in strategic planning and proactive solutions. By assuming control and preparing proactively, the industry can overcome these problems and emerge stronger.

Kamala Harris’s Multidimensional Policy Impact on Dairy Farming: An In-Depth Look 

Kamala Harris’ dairy-related policies are complex, emphasizing environmental objectives, labor legislation, and trade policy. Let us break them down to understand how they could affect dairy producers.

Environmental Goals: Striking a Tough Balance 

Harris is dedicated to robust climate action, campaigning for steps that would drastically cut greenhouse gas emissions. Her support for ideas like the Green New Deal aims to enact broad environmental improvements. This means stricter methane emissions, water consumption, and waste management restrictions for dairy farms.

While such actions may enhance long-term sustainability, they provide immediate financial concerns. Compliance with these requirements is likely to raise operating expenses. Farmers may need to invest in new technology or change existing processes, which may be expensive and time-consuming. However, there are potential benefits: these regulations may create new income sources via government incentives for adopting green technology or sustainable agricultural techniques, instilling a sense of optimism about the future.

Labor Laws: A Double-Edged Sword 

Harris favors stricter labor legislation, such as increasing the federal minimum wage and guaranteeing safer working conditions. This position may benefit farm workers, who comprise a sizable chunk of the dairy farm workforce. However, dairy producers face a double-edged sword.

Improved labor regulations may force farmers to pay higher salaries and provide more extensive benefits. While this might result in a more steady and committed staff, it also raises operating expenses. These additional costs may pressure profit margins, particularly for small—to mid-sized dairy enterprises that rely primarily on human labor. As a result, farm owners would need to weigh these expenditures against possible increases in production and labor pleasure.

Trade Policies: Navigating New Waters 

Harris promotes fair trade policies, which include strict labor and environmental requirements. Her strategy is to expand markets for American goods while safeguarding domestic interests. This might boost the dairy business by leveling the playing field with overseas rivals who may face fewer regulations.

However, renegotiating trade treaties to integrate these norms may result in times of uncertainty. Transitional periods may restrict market access until new agreements are firmly in place, temporarily reducing export volumes. However, if appropriately implemented, Harris’s fair trade proposals might stabilize and grow market prospects for American dairy producers long-term, instilling hope about future market prospects.

To summarize, Kamala Harris’ ideas bring immediate obstacles and possible long-term advantages. Dairy producers must carefully balance the effects of higher regulatory and labor expenses with the potential for long-term sustainability and fairer trading practices. As we approach this election, we must analyze how her ideas may connect with your operations and future objectives.

The Dairy Industry Under Trump: Trade Triumphs, Deregulation, and Rural Support 

Donald Trump’s experience with the dairy business provides a powerful case study on the effects of trade agreements, deregulation, and rural support. Let’s examine how these rules have influenced the sector and what they signify for dairy producers.

First and foremost, Trump’s most significant major victory in trade agreements has been reworking NAFTA into the USMCA. This deal improved market access to Canada, previously a bone of contention for American dairy producers. The revised conditions were described as a “massive win” for the sector, promising stability and new export potential [Reuters]. The Dairy Farmers of America hailed this decision, citing the much-needed market stability it provided [Dairy Farmers of America].

Deregulation has been another defining feature of Trump’s presidency. Rolling down environmental rules has been a two-edged sword. On the one hand, cutting red tape has provided dairy producers with more operational freedom and cheaper expenses. However, some opponents contend that these changes may jeopardize long-term viability. Tom Vilsack, CEO of the United States Dairy Export Council, underlined that lower rules enable farmers to innovate while remaining internationally competitive [U.S. Dairy Export Council].

Support for rural areas has also been a priority. Trump hoped to stimulate rural economies by extending internet access and boosting agricultural R&D investment. The Farmers to Household Food Box Program, a COVID-19 relief tool, helped farmers and vulnerable households by redistributing unsold dairy products. While not without practical obstacles, many saw this campaign as a vital lifeline during the epidemic.

Trump’s initiatives immediately affected dairy farmers, creating a business-friendly climate suited to their specific needs and interests. Reduced restrictions and freshly negotiated trade agreements helped to calm turbulent markets, providing much-needed respite. However, the long-term implications raise concerns about sustainability and environmental health. Balancing economic viability and sustainability practices remains difficult as farmers adopt fewer regulatory restraints.

Overall, Trump’s policies have matched dairy farmers’ immediate demands well, prioritizing profitability, market access, and lower operating costs. These actions have created a favorable climate, but the consequences for long-term sustainability must be carefully considered as the sector progresses.

Understanding Historical Context: Harris vs. Trump on Agriculture and Dairy Farming 

Understanding the historical background of Harris’ and Trump’s previous acts and policies in agriculture and dairy farming is critical for projecting their future influence on the sector. Let us review their records to get a better idea.

While Kamala Harris has no direct experience with agriculture, she has been outspoken about her environmental attitude. During her term in the Senate, she co-sponsored the Green New Deal, which seeks to combat climate change via broad economic and ecological changes (Congress.gov). This emphasis on sustainability may cause tension with conventional farming techniques, which depend significantly on present environmental rules. Her support for these initiatives shows that she may emphasize ecological issues, which might lead to harsher dairy sector regulations.

In contrast, Donald Trump has a well-documented track record of promoting agriculture via deregulation and trade policies. His government repealed various environmental restrictions, stating they were costly to farmers (WhiteHouse.gov). Trump’s renegotiation of NAFTA, now known as USMCA, featured dairy measures that benefited American farmers and expanded export potential (USTR.gov). These policies reflect a more industry-friendly approach, focusing on profitability and less government intrusion.

We can see how each contender could oversee the dairy industry by examining their backgrounds. Harris’ support for environmental changes creates both chances and hazards, while Trump’s past term constantly emphasizes deregulation and trade gains. These circumstances pave the way for a tight and effective campaign on behalf of dairy producers. Remember these concepts as we look at how they could affect your livelihood and the dairy business as a whole.

Policy Showdown: Harris’s Environmental Ambitions vs. Trump’s Farmer-Friendly Regulations

When we examine Kamala Harris and Donald Trump’s ideas, we see significant discrepancies, notably in dairy farming. Harris has often highlighted environmental sustainability, which aligns with larger climate aims. However, her emphasis on strict ecological standards may result in additional expenditures for dairy producers. Her support for the Green New Deal, for example, promises to cut greenhouse gas emissions while potentially increasing farmers’ operating expenses due to rising energy prices and compliance costs.

On the other hand, Trump’s policies have been more beneficial to farmers. His administration’s attempts to reduce regulatory barriers have benefitted the agriculture industry, namely dairy farming. The repeal of WOTUS (Waters of the United States) is a classic example of lowering compliance costs while providing farmers more control over their property. Furthermore, his trade policies, notably the USMCA (United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement), have expanded dairy producers’ market access. This is critical for bolstering dairy exports, which have grown dramatically during Trump’s leadership.

Furthermore, Harris’ dedication to shifting away from fossil fuels may put transition costs on farmers, who depend significantly on fuel for machines. In contrast, Trump’s policy to preserve low energy prices has benefited these farmers by assuring reduced operating expenses.

In short, whereas Harris’ environmental emphasis reflects long-term sustainability aims, Trump’s plans meet dairy farmers’ urgent economic demands. Trump aligns with the industry’s present requirements by lowering restrictions and promoting trade, making him a more appealing choice for dairy producers seeking quick relief and expansion potential.

Trump’s Legacy vs. Harris’s Vision: Navigating Dairy’s Complex Future

Under Trump’s administration, the dairy business saw both obstacles and development. The USDA reported a 1.3% yearly growth in milk output from 2017 to 2020 [USDA]. During this period, the Dairy Margin Protection Program was reorganized, which helped many farmers by providing improved risk management tools. Furthermore, the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) opened up new markets, notably in Canada, which was a massive success for dairy producers, resulting in almost 25% more exports in 2020 [International Dairy Foods Association].

In contrast, Harris’ suggested policies emphasize serious climate action, which might substantially affect the dairy business. For example, according to the Dairy Producers of America, her ideas for severe methane emission laws might raise operating expenses for dairy producers, possibly increasing production costs by 5-10%. Her focus on plant-based alternatives can potentially reduce dairy consumption by 3-5% in the next decade (USDA forecasts).

These numbers present a clear picture: although Trump’s term had mixed outcomes, with significant benefits from trade deals and policy restructuring, Harris’s plans may face significant hurdles due to increased environmental restrictions and market upheavals. The issue for dairy producers ultimately comes down to evaluating immediate rewards against long-term sustainability implications.

The Regulatory Crossroads: Navigating Harris’s Sustainability and Trump’s Deregulation 

Understanding each candidate’s attitude on regulation allows us to forecast how they will impact the dairy industry’s future. Environmental restrictions are a significant problem.

Kamala Harris promotes environmental sustainability, which might lead to harsher dairy farm regulations. Increased controls on greenhouse gas emissions, water consumption, and waste management may result in more extraordinary operating expenses. While these efforts promote environmental friendliness, they may burden already low business margins. However, adopting sustainable methods may result in incentives and subsidies to encourage green technology, placing wise farmers for long-term success.

Donald Trump’s strategy relies primarily on deregulation. Trump hopes to minimize compliance costs by reducing environmental regulations, giving dairy producers greater operational freedom. Critics fear this strategy might cause long-term ecological damage, reducing agricultural yield. Nonetheless, reducing red tape in the near term implies cheaper expenses and perhaps increased profitability.

Harris favors stricter labor rules, including increasing the federal minimum wage. While this approach benefits workers, it may entail more significant labor costs for dairy producers, further reducing margins. However, improved working conditions may result in a more dependable and productive staff.

Trump’s track record demonstrates a willingness to ease labor restrictions, which may help lower expenses. However, his strict immigration policies may restrict the supply of migrant labor, on which the dairy sector is strongly reliant. As a consequence, manpower shortages may arise, reducing manufacturing efficiency.

Trade agreements are another critical area of regulatory effect. Harris promotes fair trade policies, which may open new markets and include transitional risks to exporters. Her diplomatic strategy promotes global accords prioritizing labor and environmental norms, perhaps leading to more steady, if slower, market development.

Trump’s aggressive trade renegotiations, represented by the USMCA, are intended to improve American dairy export conditions. His administration’s emphasis on bilateral agreements seeks instant rewards but often results in volatility and retaliatory levies that disrupt markets. Nonetheless, his prompt measures may immediately improve market access in essential areas.

The regulatory climate under each candidate confronts dairy producers with a trade-off between immediate assistance and long-term stability. As the election approaches, choosing which course best meets your farm’s requirements and ideals is critical.

Financial Uplift: Harris’s Sustainability Focus vs. Trump’s Immediate Relief 

Both candidates have distinct perspectives on subsidies and financial assistance. Kamala Harris’ strategy focuses on targeted incentives for sustainable practices and encouraging smaller, more diverse farms. Her programs include financial assistance for farmers transitioning to organic techniques or installing environmentally friendly measures and tax breaks for those that follow more rigid environmental rules. This is consistent with her overall environmental and climatic aims, but it may face opposition from larger-scale dairy operations who want more immediate and comprehensive help.

In contrast, Donald Trump has consistently supported more excellent financial relief and deregulation. During his presidency, he increased help for dairy producers harmed by tariffs and trade disputes via programs like the Market Facilitation Program (MFP), which gave direct financial aid. In addition, Trump’s administration argued for considerable tax cuts to help larger tax-sensitive enterprises. There is also a strong emphasis on removing regulatory barriers, which supposedly reduces expenses and operational overhead for dairy producers.

Which strategy seems to be more robust? If you’re a dairy farmer who prefers rapid financial relief over regulatory action, Trump’s program is most likely in your best interests. His record of direct subsidy programs and tax breaks protects against market volatility and operating expenses. While Harris’ policies are forward-thinking and sustainability-focused, they may be more helpful in the long term but need a change in operating techniques and likely higher upfront expenses.

Trade Tactics: Trump’s Aggression vs. Harris’s Diplomacy

International trade policies are critical to the dairy business. They may make the difference between the sector’s success and failure. So, how do Trump’s trade agreements compare to Harris’ approach to international relations?

During his administration, Trump made substantial changes to international commerce. He renegotiated NAFTA to create the USMCA, which improved circumstances for American dairy farmers by expanding Canadian markets and strengthening connections with Mexico. His firm position in China paid off, with China agreeing to buy more U.S. dairy goods under trade accords [Agriculture.com]. However, these trade conflicts introduced unpredictability and retribution, occasionally harming farmers.

Harris, on the other hand, views international affairs through the lens of diplomacy and multilateral accords. Think about how this affects dairy exports. While less aggressive, this method may result in gradual, more consistent earnings rather than sudden, high-stakes victories and losses. For example, a Harris administration may concentrate on forming coalitions to eliminate minor trade obstacles, sometimes taking time and significant international effort.

Dairy producers may prefer Trump’s bold, high-risk, high-reward techniques to Harris’s steady diplomatic approach. Which method will best benefit your farm in the long run?

The Bottom Line

In conclusion, both Kamala Harris and Donald Trump provide unique benefits and difficulties for the dairy business. Harris stresses environmental sustainability via initiatives that may result in long-term advantages but may have current costs. Her position on labor rights seeks to enhance working conditions while perhaps increasing farmers’ operating costs. In contrast, Trump’s track record includes deregulation and trade deals such as the USMCA, which have offered immediate relief and expanded market prospects for dairy exporters. His initiatives have aimed to decrease regulatory burdens and provide financial assistance closely aligned with dairy producers’ urgent needs.

Dairy producers face a vital decision: temporary alleviation against long-term viability. Harris provides a forward-looking vision that necessitates changes and investments in green technology and labor standards but promises long-term advantages. Conversely, Trump takes a more realistic and business-friendly approach, addressing farmers’ short-term financial and regulatory concerns.

As the election approaches, dairy producers must carefully evaluate these issues. Consider your present problems and future goals. Which candidate’s policies are most aligned with your values and goals? Your choice will affect not just your livelihood but also the future of the dairy sector.

Key Takeaways:

  • Dairy farmers face complex challenges, including market volatility, trade disruptions, and labor shortages.
  • Harris’s policies focus on environmental sustainability, which could lead to stricter regulations and higher operational costs.
  • Harris’s support for stronger labor protections might increase labor costs but could improve worker conditions and retention.
  • Trump’s trade negotiations, such as USMCA, have provided dairy exports better market access and stability.
  • Trump’s deregulation efforts aim to reduce costs and boost operational flexibility for dairy farmers.
  • The historical context shows that Harris prioritizes environmental reforms while Trump focuses on deregulation and trade benefits.
  • Subsidies and financial support differ significantly, with Harris promoting sustainable practices and Trump offering more immediate monetary relief.
  • International trade strategies vary, with Trump’s aggressive and high-risk approach, while Harris’s emphasizes diplomatic diplomacy.
  • The decision for dairy farmers hinges on balancing immediate economic viability with long-term sustainability.

Summary:

The 2024 presidential election presents a crucial decision for dairy farmers as they weigh the immediate economic relief promised by Donald Trump’s deregulation and aggressive trade policies against Kamala Harris’s long-term vision for sustainability and environmental responsibility. While Trump offers a track record of quick, impactful changes benefiting rural communities and dairy exports, Harris’s approach insists on balancing economic viability with stringent climate action and fair labor practices. Each path carries distinct implications for the dairy industry’s future, demanding careful consideration from professionals as they navigate these complex and heavily consequential choices.

Learn more:

Join the Revolution!

Bullvine Daily is your essential e-zine for staying ahead in the dairy industry. With over 30,000 subscribers, we bring you the week’s top news, helping you manage tasks efficiently. Stay informed about milk production, tech adoption, and more, so you can concentrate on your dairy operations. 

NewsSubscribe
First
Last
Consent

The Making of Dairy Champions: Inside the European Young Breeders School

Discover how the European Young Breeders School shapes future dairy leaders. Ready to unlock global opportunities in cattle breeding? Keep reading!

Summary: Are you passionate about dairy farming and eager to see the next generation thrive? For over two decades, the European Young Breeders School (EYBS) in Belgium has been shaping young talents in cattle breeding, and the 22nd edition in 2024 promises to be bigger than ever. This isn’t just a regional affair anymore; it’s a global stage where young breeders from 23 countries immerse themselves in a rich, hands-on learning experience. With a mix of theoretical lessons and practical workshops taught in four languages, the EYBS equips attendees with skills that extend beyond the farm and into the world of international agriculture. “Teamwork and communication also play a big part, and they learn something useful daily and later in life,” – Erica Rijneveld. Not to be missed, the event also fosters life-long friendships through cultural exchange, as local farming families host young breeders. Add in the thrill of competition, where participants showcase their animals and skills, and you get an unparalleled event that’s as educational as it is exhilarating! 

  • EYBS has a 20+ year legacy of developing young talents in cattle breeding.
  • The 22nd edition in 2024 will feature participants from 23 countries.
  • Comprehensive training includes both theoretical lessons and practical workshops.
  • Course content is available in four languages: French, German, English, and Dutch.
  • Emphasis on teamwork and communication prepares participants for future careers.
  • Cultural exchanges foster lifelong friendships among young breeders.
  • Competitive elements add excitement and a real-world challenge for attendees.
European New Breeders School, dairy farming program, Belgium, young breeders, hands-on experience, practical instruction, various languages, knowledge, skills, cattle breeding, animal preparation, marketing strategies, showmanship, judging, feeding, competition, heifer conformation, cultural exchange, 23 nations, language barriers, French, German, English, Dutch, novice breeder, United States, debut, Team USA, Dave Schmocker, Whitewater, Wisconsin, organizing, fundraising efforts, school fees, aircraft tickets, training ground, dairy industry executives, profitable dairy farms, cow breeding leaders, innovators, love for dairy farming, hands-on experience.

Have you ever wondered where the next generation of cattle breeders will develop their skills? For almost 20 years, the European New Breeders School (EYBS) has been a leading program for developing new talent in dairy farming. This school, founded in Belgium in 1999, has grown into a worldwide center for young enthusiasts from 23 countries, providing exceptional learning possibilities in cattle breeding. With a curriculum that combines practical and theoretical instruction in many languages, the EYBS offers participants the information and hands-on experience they need to succeed in cattle breeding. Around 150 young breeders worldwide attend yearly, making it a staple event in the dairy farming industry. The EYBS not only nurtures young talent but also contributes to the advancement of the dairy farming industry. Want to learn more? Continue reading to see why the EYBS is a breeding ground for future agricultural winners.

From Regional Roots to Global Gathering: The Inspiring Journey of the European Young Breeders School

The European Young Breeders School (EYBS) was founded in 1999 to train young cattle breeders from Belgium, France, the Netherlands, and Germany. It began as a tiny regional endeavor but rapidly grew in popularity and earned a reputation for quality. Over the years, EYBS has grown into an international event with participation from all over the world. Today, young people from 23 nations, including Australia, Canada, and Italy, gather in Belgium to study and compete. This astonishing development has evolved EYBS into a cultural interaction center, receiving almost 2,000 young breeders since its founding.

A Deep Dive into Hands-On Workshops and Thrilling Competitions 

The EYBS program immerses young breeders in a five-day experience that includes three days of rigorous instruction and two days of competition.

During the first three days, participants dive into workshops and hands-on practice sessions, learning essential skills for showing and marketing cattle. Some of the critical workshops cover: 

  • Animal Preparation: Techniques in washing, bedding, clipping, and braiding cattle.
  • Marketing: Strategies for promoting and selling livestock effectively.
  • Showmanship: How to present cattle in the ring, emphasizing conformation and handling.
  • Judging: Understanding the criteria for assessing cattle quality and performance.
  • Feeding: Nutrition plans to ensure cattle maintain optimal health and appearance for shows.

Following the training period, the subsequent two days are dedicated to competition. Participants put their newfound skills to the test in: 

  • Heifer Conformation Classes: Judging the physical structure and attributes of heifers.
  • Showmanship Classes: Showcasing the handlers’ abilities to present and manage cattle in the ring.

Competitors are evaluated on their collaboration, animal preparation, and presenting abilities throughout the week. The competition concludes with honors for the best clipper/fitter, showman, and top teams.

The Magic of Cultural Exchange: 23 Countries, One Unifying Experience

Imagine young breeders from 23 different nations together in Belgium; this is the charm of the European Young Breeders School. Participants come from areas as diverse as Australia, Canada, and Italy, resulting in a melting pot of cultures and ideas. This event is more than just a training program; it’s a lively cultural interchange. Friendships formed these days might persist for years, crossing boundaries and determining future agricultural cooperation.

Language barriers? Not a problem here. The school provides French, German, English, and Dutch classes, guaranteeing that every novice breeder receives complete instruction, regardless of background. This multilingual method not only accommodates the many native languages but also encourages inclusion and mutual understanding among participants. These young people develop a global perspective via interactions, shared meals, and joint tasks, in addition to learning cattle breeding. This emphasis on inclusivity ensures that every participant feels welcomed and valued at the EYBS.

A New Era: Team USA Joins the European Young Breeders School 

While Canada has proudly sent teams since 2014, 2024 will be a historic event in the EYBS as the United States debuted. Dave Schmocker of Whitewater, Wisconsin, was instrumental in establishing the first-ever US team. Dave cites his longtime friend Erica Rijneveld as the driving force behind this endeavor. He has known Erica for over 20 years since he used to go to Europe and perform at performances with Quim Serrabassa and Erica. She had been bugging him for years to form a US team, and in March of this year, she called to inform him that she had signed them up and booked a spot. That was just the impetus they needed.

The team’s selection process includes calls to well-known dairy business officials nationwide. Schmocker assembled a selection committee that includes seasoned individuals such as John Erbsen, Aaron Eaton, Lindsay Bowen, Pat Conroy, Lynn Harbaugh, Mark and Nicky Rueth, Adam Liddle, Mike and Julie Duckett, Eddie and Mandi Bue, Chris and Jen Hill. These people have been doing it for 20 or 30 years and are still unstoppable unless you are willing to work as hard as them. About 20 young people submitted resumes, which the committee carefully ranked to select the final team members: Lauren Silveira of Chowchilla, CA; Hayden Reichard of Chambersburg, PA; Jacob Harbaugh of Marion, WI; Alli Walker of Wisconsin Dells, WI; Stella Schmocker of Whitewater, WI; and Camyrn Crothers of Pitcher, NY.

Fundraising efforts have been vital in covering school fees and plane tickets, ensuring that the young participants do not face financial hardship. On August 7th, CattleClub.com sponsored an online fundraiser, with 100% of the proceeds benefiting Team USA Youth Breeders. The auction included embryos from well-known show cows, fitting equipment, and gift certificates. Reflecting on the accomplishment, Dave said that the school costs $450 and the aircraft ticket costs around $1,000, but he wants all of these children to be able to attend for free. If enough funds are raised, the idea is to purchase some 220-powered cutters and blowers and store them there until next year. The plan is to invest in these young people while saving money for their future. Next year, they may send two squadrons! On August 28th, the team plans to go to Belgium a day early to adapt before the hectic, demanding week starts on August 29th. Dave is delighted with the international exposure and ability to develop global relationships. He expects this experience will result in new relationships, potential teammates, and future business partners. They want to visit each other in the United States and Canada, establishing solid international ties that will benefit everyone involved. Although the first year of any business may be busy, Dave radiates confidence and joy. Seeing those kids there will provide him enough personal delight to make it all worthwhile.

Success Stories: The Lasting Impact of EYBS on Young Breeders 

When young breeders come home from the European Young Breeders School (EYBS), their success stories spread across the dairy farming industry. Erica Rijneveld, a longtime tutor, has seen several young talents grow. “I’ve dealt with many passionate young breeders over the years. “The transformation they go through in just a week is unbelievable,” she says. Rijneveld underlines, “It’s incredible to see them grow not just in skills but also in confidence and teamwork.”

Take Kate Cummings, who competed in animal preparation methods and finished sixth in the 24-25-year-old handlers class at 2023 school. She recalls, “The experience was incredible.” I got insights that textbooks could never provide. The friendships and worldwide contacts I’ve acquired are invaluable.”

Felix Lemire of Canada is another outstanding performer. In 2022, he became the Champion Showman. His success sparked interest in Quebec, highlighting EYBS’s global reach. Over 2,000 students have benefitted from the school’s practical days and exciting performances.

Brad Seager of New Zealand also made news by finishing third in the July 2022-born heifer conformation class. His participation demonstrates the program’s breadth and capacity to develop champions from all around the world. When questioned about his experience, Brad said it was more than just about the competition. The training sessions were eye-opening, and the mentors were highly inspirational.

Statistics support these anecdotal results. Over 150 young breeders from 16 countries participated in 2023 alone, promoting considerable skill development and cultural interaction. Furthermore, many graduates own profitable dairy farms or become notable leaders in cow breeding circles, demonstrating the program’s lasting significance.

Longtime educator Erica Rijneveld states, “The true victory isn’t the prizes they get; it’s the lifetime love for cattle breeding that EYBS instills. “That is the true measure of our success.”

Beyond the Classroom: How EYBS Shapes Future Leaders in Dairy Farming 

The influence of the European Young Breeders School (EYBS) goes well beyond the immediate educational advantages for the young participants. EYBS successfully shapes future cow breeding leaders and innovators by instilling a love for dairy farming and giving hands-on experience. These young breeders improve their animal preparation and presentation abilities while learning essential marketing, collaboration, and cultural exchange lessons. As they return to their home countries, equipped with new information and a worldwide network, they serve as advocates for the best dairy farming methods.

Furthermore, the program’s focus on critical and honest self-assessment helps participants cultivate an attitude of ongoing growth. This mindset is essential for innovation in the dairy business, as changing problems need adaptable and forward-thinking approaches. Participating in EYBS exposes young breeders to cutting-edge methods and technology, preparing them to drive advances in cow breeding and farm management.

Another significant long-term advantage is the expansion of international collaboration. EYBS relationships often develop in global partnerships, allowing for sharing ideas and practices that may lead to industry-wide advancements. As young breeders advance into leadership positions, these linkages contribute to a more unified and creative global dairy community.

The success of previous participants demonstrates the program’s effectiveness. Many EYBS graduates have achieved substantial success in their disciplines, helping to enhance animal genetics, sustainable farming techniques, and dairy management. These success stories motivate the next generation of young breeders, resulting in a mentoring and excellence cycle that benefits the dairy business.

The European Young Breeders School is more than just a training program; it drives long-term development and innovation in the dairy sector. By developing the abilities and goals of young breeders today, we assure a better, more sustainable future for dairy farming worldwide.

The Backbone of EYBS: Uniting Forces to Cultivate Future Dairy Leaders

The Association Wallonne des Eleveurs (Elevéo and Inovéo) is instrumental in organizing and sponsoring the European Young Breeders School (EYBS). They are the primary organizers, ensuring that each edition of the school works smoothly and efficiently. This includes handling logistics, collaborating with overseas teams, and controlling the overall event organization.

Elevéo and Inovéo are not alone in their attempt. The Battice Agriculture Fair is a significant contributor, providing financial assistance and a platform for worldwide dairy farming enthusiasts. Holstein Quebec, another important partner, helps financially by organizing judges and assuring the quality of training programs.

Furthermore, additional sponsors assist with grants and gifts, helping offset costs and allowing inexperienced breeders to participate without incurring excessive expenditures. This collaborative effort demonstrates the community’s commitment to nurturing young talent in cattle breeding, ensuring that the EYBS continues to inspire and elevate future generations of the profession.

The Bottom Line

The European Young Breeders School (EYBS) in Belgium is more than an event; it’s a training ground for future dairy industry executives. From its modest regional origins to a worldwide meeting of young talents from 23 nations, the EYBS has provided a unique combination of hands-on training and exhilarating contests. Its focus on hands-on instruction in cattle preparation, marketing, and showmanship, all in a multicultural setting, develops young enthusiasts into professional, informed breeders.

What distinguishes the EYBS is its emphasis on cultural interaction and personal growth. Participants enhance their technical skills while living with local families and socializing with peers from all over the globe. They also form long-lasting friendships and create professional networks. This worldwide partnership provides the groundwork for a more connected and collaborative future in the dairy business.

Programs like the EYBS remind us of the potential that awaits the next generation. But what if every nation made equivalent investments in fostering young agricultural talent? Could we be on the verge of a worldwide dairy farming revolution spearheaded by motivated and well-trained young leaders?

Learn more:

Join the Revolution!

Bullvine Daily is your essential e-zine for staying ahead in the dairy industry. With over 30,000 subscribers, we bring you the week’s top news, helping you manage tasks efficiently. Stay informed about milk production, tech adoption, and more, so you can concentrate on your dairy operations. 

NewsSubscribe
First
Last
Consent

Manure Management Mastery: Essential Tips for Dairy Farmers to Prevent Spills and Protect the Environment

Need to improve your manure management? Discover essential tips to prevent spills and safeguard your environment. Ready to boost your farm’s sustainability and safety?

Summary: Dairy farmers, your actions can make a significant difference in preventing manure spills that could threaten the integrity of your farm and the environment. In Wisconsin, a manure spill must be reported if it can potentially threaten surface or groundwater. Taking proactive measures can significantly reduce the environmental threat posed by manure spills, thereby protecting the local ecology and dairy industry. The severity of a spill depends on the environment and proximity to water sources, with factors like timing and weather conditions influencing its impact. For example, a small amount of dung in a stream during hot summer can destroy fish populations. At the same time, runoff issues worsen with thawing ground—nutrient runoff peaks during spring and autumn due to heightened agricultural activity and precipitation. Your commitment to adequate manure management and rigorous training year-round is not just a duty but a hopeful step towards preventing spills, protecting water quality, and maintaining a positive public image.

  • Manure spills must be reported in Wisconsin if they threaten surface or groundwater.
  • Environmental impact varies depending on proximity to water sources and weather conditions.
  • Hot summers amplify the adverse effects of even small spills on aquatic life.
  • Thawing ground during spring increases the risk of manure runoff.
  • Increased agricultural activity in spring and autumn heightens the likelihood of spills.
  • Year-round manure management and training are vital for preventing spills and maintaining public trust.
manure spills, environmental threat, local ecology, dairy industry, Wisconsin, severity, surrounding environment, water sources, timing, environmental circumstances, hot summer months, oxygen levels, fish populations, colder months, lower temperatures, thaw, frozen ground, runoff problems, nutrient runoff, spring, autumn, agricultural activity, precipitation, phosphorus losses, rainy circumstances, manure management, legislative requirement, water quality, public image, ecosystem, farmers, manure applicators, regular inspections, overflowing storage, positive public image, safeguard streams, groundwater, integrity, dairy sector

Have you ever considered the environmental effects of a manure spill? It’s more than just an unfortunate accident; it’s a severe problem that could tarnish your farm’s image and harm the local ecology. But here’s the good news: proper manure management is not just a legislative necessity; it’s also a powerful tool for protecting water quality, maintaining a positive public image, and sustaining the ecosystem we all rely on. Just a few weeks ago, Wisconsin experienced two deadly manure-related incidents, highlighting the severity and urgency of this issue.

Recent instances in Sheboygan County are especially alarming:

  • A semi-truck delivering manure collided with a train, killing a person.
  • A non-farming person violated a stop sign and was hit by a manure transporter, resulting in another fatality.

“Any spill that’s not addressed reflects negatively on the entire dairy industry and is often used as ammunition by anti-farming groups.”

These occurrences show the need to establish effective manure management procedures. It’s more than simply compliance; it’s about your farm’s heritage and your neighborhood’s health. As a farmer or manure applicator, you play an essential and empowering role in avoiding such events and safeguarding the safety of your neighborhood.

Wisconsin’s Manure Spill Reporting: Where Professional Judgment Meets Environmental Stewardship

In Wisconsin, the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) defines a manure spill as any emission of manure that has the potential to pollute surface or groundwater. Wisconsin’s definition is more subjective than other states, which quantify spills in specified quantities. Because of its subjective character, farmers and manure applicators must use their professional judgment to evaluate if a spill should be recorded. Your expert judgment is not just trusted, but it’s also crucial throughout this process.

For example, imagine spreading 15,000 liters of manure per acre over a field. Suppose a tiny spill of five gallons is spread out rather than concentrated. In that case, it is unlikely to be reported since it falls within the average application rate. In contrast, if a comparable volume of manure falls near a trout stream or a sinkhole, the danger to the waterway qualifies as a reportable occurrence. The surrounding environment and closeness to water sources are critical factors in this decision.

The consequences of a spill might also change depending on the time of year. Even a tiny quantity of dung entering a stream on a hot summer day might wipe out the fish population. In contrast, the same amount may have a decreased influence during the winter months, when water activity is reduced. Thus, the time of year substantially impacts the choice to report.

Sound judgment is essential, drawing on personal experiences and professional views. As the farmer, you have the most excellent understanding of your land and its weaknesses. When considering whether a spill should be reported, trust your instincts and understanding since your actions significantly impact public image and environmental stewardship.

Manure Spills: Unseen Threats to Waterways and Aquatic Life 

Manure spills severely affect surface and groundwater, altering ecosystems and poisoning water supplies. Manure reaches streams and lakes, contributing to nutrient loading, particularly nitrogen and phosphorus. These nutrients may induce hazardous algal blooms (HABs), depleting water oxygen and creating dead zones where aquatic life cannot thrive. This potential harm to aquatic life should be a strong motivator for us to prevent manure spills.

Its timing and environmental circumstances strongly influence a manure spill’s severity. For example, during the hot summer months, even a tiny quantity of manure in a stream may significantly limit oxygen levels, destroying local fish populations. During colder months, such as March, the water’s lower temperatures mean fish are less active. Therefore, the same amount of dung may have a less immediate effect. However, thaw and frozen ground may worsen runoff problems by transporting manure over longer distances and possibly spreading pollution.

Studies show dramatic variances under various settings. According to Wisconsin’s Department of Natural Resources, nutrient runoff peaks in the spring and autumn, when agricultural activity is highest and precipitation is most common. This discharge pollutes water and upsets ecosystems’ natural equilibrium, causing long-term harm. Research published in the Journal of Environmental Quality discovered that applying manure under rainy circumstances might increase phosphorus losses by 2 to 10 times compared to dry conditions.

Given these possible consequences, farms must conduct adequate manure management year-round. They defend their livelihoods and their communities’ overall environmental health.

Preventing Manure Spills: Best Practices 

Let’s discuss some practical ways to reduce manure leaks on your farm. We all understand the necessity of protecting the environment and avoiding headlines that may harm the public’s view of dairy production.

Regular Equipment Maintenance 

First, ensure all of your equipment is in excellent shape. Regular inspections may avoid many of the problems that cause spills. Assume you’re transporting manure in the field, and a valve malfunctions. A brief assessment before beginning may have spared you from a costly cleaning effort. Remember that missing pins or loose connections are simple errors that might result in significant difficulties.

Example: One farmer reported a manure leak due to a worn-out tractor connection. A simple replacement during routine maintenance may have averted the problem.

Driver Training 

Next, think about your driving training. Are they adequately equipped to deal with the intricacies of manure transport? Training programs are available and may dramatically minimize the likelihood of spillage. It’s not only about driving ability; it’s also about understanding the equipment and knowing what to do if anything goes wrong.

Example: Another typical issue is that novice drivers take too sudden turns, leading the tanker to tilt. Proper training in managing and moving massive equipment may mitigate this danger.

Monitoring Manure Storage Levels 

Finally, monitor the amount of manure in your storage area. Overflowing storage is an avoidable calamity. Regular inspections, particularly after severe rains, can help you avoid issues. Installing gauges or indicators makes it easier to keep track of levels.

Example: A Wisconsin farm had a manure pit overflow because no one monitored the levels for a week during the wet season. Simple weekly monitoring may have identified the issue earlier.

Common Mistakes and How to Avoid Them 

  • Not Training Drivers: Untrained drivers might make expensive mistakes. Regular training sessions and refreshers may help everyone stay sharp.
  • Skipping Equipment Checks: Never underestimate the value of regular checkups. Early detection of wear and tear may save you money and reduce environmental impact.
  • Ignoring Storage Levels: Make storage inspections a regular part of your farm management. They only take a few minutes and may save you hours of cleaning time and frustration.

Implementing these procedures will safeguard our streams and groundwater while maintaining the integrity of the dairy sector. The work requires dedication, but the benefits—safety, reputation, and peace of mind—are well worth it.

When Chaos Strikes: Why Every Farm Needs an Emergency Response Plan 

Consider the worst-case scenario: a manure leak happens on your farm. Panic sets in, and everyone scrambles to act, but without a well-planned strategy, anarchy ensues. This is why having an emergency response plan is not a choice but a need. This approach guarantees that everyone knows their duties, understands the communication procedures, and can act quickly and effectively to manage and contain the spill.

First, let’s discuss roles and duties. Your response plan should specify who is liable for what in the case of a spill. This involves appointing a principal leader who will take command and make crucial decisions and delegating particular duties to team members, such as equipment shutdown, site security, and early containment measures. Everyone should understand their responsibilities to prevent misunderstanding when time is of the essence.

Next, suitable communication methods are essential. The strategy should include communicating within the team and with other parties, such as local governments, insurance companies, and environmental organizations. Ensure you have a communication tree with contact information for all essential parties and who will be in charge of external communications. This reduces the spread of disinformation and keeps all parties informed.

The strategy should expressly state what urgent activities to take. It should include procedures for immediate spill control, such as turning off any pumps, employing absorbent materials, and erecting barriers to prevent spread. These efforts are crucial to preventing the spill from spreading and causing more environmental harm. A readily available spill response kit may significantly speed up the procedure.

Finally, the value of implementing the strategy must be emphasized more. Regular drills will familiarize your staff with the processes and guarantee that everyone can respond quickly and effectively in an emergency. Annual review and update of the plan to accommodate new equipment or changes in people may substantially impact your level of preparation.

A well-executed emergency response strategy is your first line of protection against manure spills. It protects the environment and builds your farm’s reputation for responsible management. So, take the time to create, share, and rehearse your plan—you’ll thank yourself when the unexpected occurs.

Real-Life Lessons: Tragedies and Triumphs in Manure Spill Management

Consider a recent event in Sheboygan County, in which a manure semi-truck collided with a train, killing the driver. The loss is terrible, but it emphasizes the importance of awareness and safety training. Proper planning and a strong knowledge of traffic routes, particularly those that overlap with rail lines, might have reduced this danger. One crucial insight is that frequent scenario-based training might help prepare drivers for unexpected problems.

In another Sheboygan County incident, an inattentive motorist ran a stop sign and slammed with a manure lorry, killing another person. This terrible event highlights the need for visible and effective communication tools on agricultural equipment, such as bright, clean reflective tape and functional turn signals. Regularly maintaining these measures improves road safety for agricultural workers and the general public.

A less tragic but equally revealing occurrence happened when a manure truck turned too sharply, depositing thousands of liters onto the roadway. The main problems here were driver weariness and error. Farmers may arrange frequent breaks and change drivers to keep them attentive, reducing the likelihood of expensive errors. Encouraging drivers to take obligatory rest breaks may minimize fatigue-related mistakes, resulting in safer transport.

Another incident in Dodge County involved a farmer who needed help getting essential equipment to treat an overflowing manure pile due to inadequate tool availability prioritizing. He spent crucial time moving other machines to the chisel plow required to clean up the spill. Following this occurrence, the farmer acquired a specialized chisel plow for emergency usage, kept it in an easily accessible area, and dramatically enhanced his farm’s preparedness for future situations.

These real-life situations have a similar theme: readiness and good management are not merely regulatory compliance procedures but also critical for safety and environmental stewardship. Comprehensive training, frequent equipment maintenance, and fast access to required instruments may all help to avoid or reduce the severity of incidents, protecting both people and the environment.

Public Image: The Invisible Stake in Manure Spill Management 

When dealing with manure spills, the farm’s public image is more than simply an afterthought; it’s critical. Any spill, mild or severe, may quickly damage the reputation you’ve created through years of hard effort. When the community learns of an uncontrolled manure leak, their view instantly shifts. If not handled swiftly and publicly, such instances give great fodder for anti-farming parties looking to expose industry flaws.

  • Visible Action During and After Spills
  • Maintaining community trust depends on controlling spills and being seen to manage them. Swift, visible action communicates accountability while mitigating possible reactions. When a spill happens, it is critical to have a committed person on-site who can supervise the cleaning and speak with any spectators or authorities. This individual should oversee operations and communicate with the community, holistically detailing the steps to solve the problem. Such candor builds confidence and demonstrates that you are not concealing the issue but are actively attempting to fix it.
  • Responding to Anti-Farming Sentiments
  • Anti-farming organizations sometimes use situations like manure spills to further their agendas, affecting public opinion and legislation. Demonstrating your farm’s dedication to ecologically sound methods is critical to mitigate their effect. Regular updates to the community on preventative measures and prior successes in manure management might help to avoid unfavorable depictions. Furthermore, a well-documented emergency response strategy and training demonstrate your commitment to reducing environmental impact.

To summarize, proactively controlling manure spills entails more than simply environmental responsibility; it also requires careful consideration of your farm’s reputation and community connections. Transparency, prompt response, and continued communication are the foundations of public trust, reducing the negative consequences of spills and protecting your farm’s image.

Reporting Manure Spills: The Crucial Role of Professional Judgment and Rigorous Standards

In Wisconsin, the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) requires that any manure spill that could harm surface or groundwater be notified promptly. This criterion is based on expert judgment rather than a particular number, distinguishing Wisconsin from neighboring states that often have more measurable limits, such as five or 100 gallons.

The restrictions for big farms, known as Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations (CAFOs), are more rigorous. CAFOs with a Wisconsin Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (WPDES) permit must report every spill, regardless of size, to the DNR. The zero-tolerance approach provides increased inspection and environmental protection.

In contrast, smaller enterprises depend mainly on human judgment to establish whether a spill is reportable. While the flexibility allows for situational evaluation, it also burdens the farmers’ judgment. These operators need proper training and knowledge to maintain environmental safety and regulatory compliance.

For farmers looking to stay compliant, several resources are available: 

Immediate and accurate reporting not only aids in swift resolution but also upholds the public image of the farming community. Farmers must familiarize themselves with both state-specific and federal regulations to mitigate risks and maintain environmental integrity.

Empowering Manure Handlers: The Value of Training and Certification Programs

Training and certification programs are critical to the successful management of manure applications. Manure handlers with sufficient training are better prepared to control and avoid spills, ensuring environmental safety and operational efficiency.

In Wisconsin, various programs exist to certify manure applicators. The University of Wisconsin Extension provides comprehensive training and certification programs on critical issues such as safe application practices, equipment maintenance, and emergency response procedures. The Manure Applicator Association of Wisconsin also offers specific training sessions for English and Spanish-speaking applicators.

The benefits of having certified staff are enormous. Statistics show that skilled applicators experience fewer occurrences. For example, private sector auditors state that the frequency of claimable occurrences involving licensed applicators has decreased by more than 80%. This reduces environmental concerns while improving the farm’s public image and operational dependability.

Beyond spill avoidance, qualified staff are more skilled at managing equipment and are current on the newest best practices. This knowledge improves nutrient management, lowering the risk of overapplication and subsequent runoff. Furthermore, professional applicators are skilled at spotting and treating possible dangers before they cause serious problems, protecting the farm’s reputation and the surrounding ecology.

Investing in manure applicator training and certification is more than legal compliance; it is a proactive approach to sustainable farm management. It signifies a dedication to quality and accountability, ensuring that manure application is carried out safely, efficiently, and by environmental requirements.

The Bottom Line

Managing manure is more than simply meeting legal requirements; it’s about maintaining our shared water resources, aquatic life, and the dairy industry’s reputation. Regular equipment maintenance, complete driver training, continuous monitoring of manure storage levels, and a well-practiced emergency reaction plan are all critical measures that considerably decrease the danger of leaks. Each action reduces environmental effects while demonstrating a farm’s commitment to responsible management.

Because most manure spills are avoidable, every farm manager and owner must ensure that their operations prioritize these preventative procedures. As previously noted, the consequences of neglect may be severe, ranging from legal ramifications to negative impacts on community relations and the natural environment. Adopting these best practices is much more than a suggestion; it is necessary for the farm’s and the environment’s long-term viability.

So, as a steward of your property and the larger ecology, consider whether you are prepared to deal with a manure leak. Have you invested in the training and tools required to avoid accidents and react promptly if they do occur? Taking action now may make all the difference tomorrow. Protect your farm and the environment—the future of agriculture relies on it.

Learn more: 

Discover How U.S. Cows Are Shattering Milk Production Effficiency Records!

Prepare to be amazed by the U.S. dairy cows breaking and shattering milk production records. Curious about their secrets and what it means for global demand? Keep reading.

Summary: Have you ever been intrigued by the fierce competition among top-producing states in the U.S. dairy industry? This competition has led to a significant increase in milk production, with the average U.S. milk cow producing 63% more milk in 2023 than in 1990. Michigan, a key player in this competition, leads in efficiency. The U.S. dairy industry has become a global powerhouse, with increased per-cow output and butterfat levels. Over the past decade, U.S. dairy cows saw per cow output rise by 11%, from 21,722 lbs. in 2013 to 24,117 lbs. in 2023. Michigan tops the nation, producing 27,564 lbs. of milk per cow per year, an 81% increase since 1990. Advanced technology, genetic selection, and artificial insemination have led to healthier cows producing more milk, driving cash revenues to an expected $42 billion in 2022, up from $35 billion in 2013.

  • Michigan leads the nation in milk production per cow, with an 81% increase since 1990.
  • The average U.S. milk cow produced 63% more milk in 2023 compared to 1990.
  • Butterfat levels in U.S. milk have significantly improved, contributing to increased dairy output.
  • Top-producing states include Texas, New York, Wisconsin, and Idaho, with Texas leading in 2023.
  • Advanced technology, genetic selection, and artificial insemination are critical drivers of increased efficiency.
  • U.S. dairy cows saw an 11% rise in per-cow output over the past decade.
  • The U.S. dairy industry’s efficiency has made it a global powerhouse, with notable increases in cash revenues.
U.S. dairy cows, milk production, per-cow output, fat content of milk, butterfat level, milk cow, milk production efficiency, Michigan, Wyoming, Colorado, Texas, New York, Wisconsin, Idaho, milk yields, United Kingdom, Argentina, European Union, China, dairy farming innovations, advanced technology, milking machines, automated feeding systems, precision agricultural equipment, labor expenses, productivity, genetic selection, artificial insemination, healthier cows, cash revenues, dairy sector.
U.S. dairy cows, milk production, per-cow output, fat content of milk, butterfat level, milk cow, milk production efficiency, Michigan, Wyoming, Colorado, Texas, New York, Wisconsin, Idaho, milk yields, United Kingdom, Argentina, European Union, China, dairy farming innovations, advanced technology, milking machines, automated feeding systems, precision agricultural equipment, labor expenses, productivity, genetic selection, artificial insemination, healthier cows, cash revenues, dairy sector.

Over the past decade, the U.S. dairy industry has experienced a significant surge in milk production, marking a period of remarkable growth and transformation. Dairy cows have broken new milk production records, with the per-cow output increasing by an impressive 11%, from 21,722 lbs. in 2013 to 24,117 lbs. in 2023. This surge in production is not limited to the quantity of milk. Butterfat production in the United States has also seen a substantial increase of 23%, with the average butterfat content rising from 3.76% in 2013 to 4.11% in 2023. These consistent advances in efficiency have resulted in the typical U.S. milk cow producing 63% more milk in 2023 than in 1990. This unprecedented growth underscores the transformation of U.S. dairy farming, making our cows some of the most productive in the world. But what is the key to these extraordinary accomplishments, and how have American dairy producers remained ahead of global competition? Let’s delve into this record-breaking trend and explore the methods that produce these incredible outcomes.

LocationAverage Milk Yield per Cow (lbs.)% Increase Since 1990
Michigan27,56481%
Wyoming26,000100%
Colorado24,00051%
Texas25,50070%
Wisconsin25,40065%
Canada23,900Not Available
United Kingdom19,000Not Available
Argentina17,000Not Available
European Union16,000Not Available
China11,000Not Available
New Zealand10,000Not Available

The Golden Era of U.S. Dairy Farming: A Decade of Unparalleled Efficiency 

The last decade has been nothing short of transformative, inspiring American dairy producers to reach new heights of efficiency. Have you ever wondered how much more efficient contemporary dairy farming has become? Let’s look at some incredible data demonstrating the nationwide growth in milk production efficiency.

In only ten years, per-cow milk production increased by 11%, with the typical dairy cow producing 24,117 pounds of milk in 2023, up from 21,722 in 2013. Such significant increases do not end there. The fat content of milk—an important indication of quality—has also increased significantly. The average butterfat level in U.S. milk grew from 3.76% in 2013 to 4.11% in 2023, representing a 23% increase in total butterfat production.

Think about it. What exactly does this imply for the industry? This means that dairy producers may now produce more and higher-quality milk with fewer cows using innovative procedures and technologies created and perfected over time. These numbers highlight a remarkable trend of increased efficiency and production, establishing a new standard for dairy farming throughout the globe.

State-by-State Breakdown: The Top Performers in Milk Production 

Let’s look at the top milk producers in each state. Michigan has taken the top rank in terms of production. Michigan’s dairy cows produce an astonishing 27,564 pounds of milk per cow per year, representing an 81% increase since 1990. This gigantic tower exemplifies the state’s continuous pursuit of efficiency.

Wyoming is just a little behind, and it is also seeing remarkable development. Despite being a minor player, Wyoming’s handful of dairy cattle have improved their game by more than tripling their milk supply since 1990, achieving second place. Colorado isn’t slacking either; the state ranked third with a 51% increase in milk output over the same time.

The battle for fourth place is fierce among several central dairy states. Texas, for example, leads with yields surprisingly close to those of other heavyweights like New York, Wisconsin, and Idaho, averaging roughly 25,500 pounds per cow annually. However, the Lone Star State edged the competition to take the top spot in 2023.

Each state provides something unique, yet all are dedicated to pushing the limits of dairy efficiency. These states are boosting the dairy business in the United States to new heights by combining innovation, innovative technology, and a never-ending pursuit of progress.

How Do U.S. Dairy Farms Stack Up Against Their International Counterparts? 

How do U.S. dairy farms compare to their overseas counterparts? Let’s look at the data to discover why milk production in the United States is the industry gold standard.

Dairy cows in the United States are outperforming all other countries regarding milk production. In 2023, cows in the United States produced an average of 24,117 pounds of milk each year. In contrast, Canadian dairy cows generated 3% less milk while being the second most efficient globally. This implies that each cow in the United States produced around 724 pounds of extra milk yearly.

Looking farther out, the margin of advantage becomes much more enormous. The United Kingdom ranked third, behind by a considerable 24%, implying that its cows generated around 5,788 lbs. less milk per head. Argentina has significantly lower yields, behind the United States by 30%. Argentine cows generate around 7,235 kg. Less milk is produced per cow each year.

The European Union, a significant participant in the global dairy market, also lagged. With 34% lower yields than U.S. cows, this equates to an annual deficit of around 8,200 pounds per cow. Moving to Asia, China’s dairy farming innovations have yet to overcome the gap; their outputs still fall short of what American cows generated in 1990. This reflects the United States’ longtime leadership in efficient milk production.

Finally, consider New Zealand, which is known for its dairy exports. Despite worldwide renown, New Zealand’s milk per cow fell 59% behind the United States. That’s a stunning discrepancy, meaning that New Zealand cows generated roughly 14,235 pounds less milk each cow each year.

These figures show that American dairy farms are competing and improving milk production efficiency. This unprecedented productivity enables U.S. farmers to supply local and worldwide dairy demand successfully.

Ever Wondered What’s Behind This Surge in Efficiency? Let’s Dive into the Magic Formula Transforming U.S. Dairy Farming 

Ever wonder what’s behind this spike in efficiency? Look at the golden recipe revolutionizing dairy farming in the United States. Technology is playing an important role. Advanced milking machines, automated feeding systems, and precision agricultural equipment have transformed farm operations. These advancements are more than flashy gadgets; they are game changers that lower labor expenses and boost productivity.

However, technology alone does not tell the whole story. Breeding procedures have undergone a significant revision, and this is a crucial factor behind the surge in efficiency in U.S. dairy farming. Genetic selection and artificial insemination enable producers to raise cows with better characteristics, leading to healthier cows that produce more milk. According to the USDA, selective breeding has considerably increased milk output per cow over the previous several decades. This, combined with advanced technology and cutting-edge agricultural management strategies, forms a multidimensional approach that keeps U.S. dairy farms at the forefront of global milk production, establishing new benchmarks for efficiency and productivity.

Let us remember cutting-edge agricultural management strategies. Farmers use data analytics to track cow health, milk quality, and overall farm performance. These data-driven solutions facilitate informed decision-making, improving resource use and cow wellbeing.

It is a multidimensional method that combines technology, research, and intelligent management. This comprehensive plan keeps U.S. dairy farms at the forefront of global milk production, establishing new benchmarks for efficiency and productivity. So, the next time you drink a glass of milk, know there’s much thought and creativity behind that creamy pleasure.

The Ripple Effect: How Higher Milk Yields Are Transforming the Entire Dairy Industry 

Higher milk yields aren’t beneficial to individual dairy farms; they’re practically rewriting the economic script for the dairy sector. Let us break it down. Dairy producers benefit immediately from improved milk output. Additional milk production produces additional products, including butter, cheese, and yogurt, resulting in a more diverse income stream. According to USDA research, the U.S. dairy sector’s cash revenues would amount to $42 billion in 2022, up from $35 billion in 2013 [USDA research]. That’s about a 20% increase in a little under a decade!

Furthermore, higher efficiency leads to decreased expenses per unit of milk produced. This is crucial because it increases farmers’ competitiveness in the global market. Farmers in the United States have maintained operating expenses roughly unchanged while increasing output by optimizing feed, improving genetic selection programs, and introducing modern milking technology. This efficiency makes U.S. dairy goods appealing to overseas purchasers, increasing profitability. According to the National Milk Producers Federation, exports accounted for around 16% of total U.S. milk output in 2022, up from 9% a decade before [NMPF Statistics].

These advances impact the whole economy, not just the agriculture sector. Increased milk production benefits downstream businesses in transportation, retailing, and equipment manufacturing. Dairy farming has the potential to generate significant economic multiplier effects. In Michigan, for example, the dairy business provides more than $15 billion to the state’s economy yearly, sustaining approximately 40,000 employees directly and indirectly. These figures demonstrate how increases in agricultural efficiency may benefit the whole area’s economy.

The increase in milk output has far-reaching economic consequences. For dairy producers in the United States, this implies more profitability and a more decisive competitive advantage. For the larger economy, it represents strong growth and employment creation. These interconnected advantages demonstrate why efficiency in milk production is more than simply a source of pride; it is also a cornerstone of economic health.

The Bottom Line

In today’s dairy sector, U.S. dairy cows’ increasing efficiency and production are extraordinary. Over the past decade, milk yields and component levels have improved significantly, propelling American dairy farmers to the forefront of global dairy production. States such as Michigan, Wyoming, and Colorado have established remarkable standards, with milk production continually increasing due to agricultural discoveries and developments.

Globally, the United States outperforms other major dairy-exporting countries such as Canada, the United Kingdom, and New Zealand. This domination fulfills the increasing demand for dairy products and establishes new industry norms globally.

How can you use these insights and improvements to improve dairy operations? What actions can you take to make your dairy farm more efficient and join the ranks of these record-breaking producers?

Learn more: 

Dairy States Hold the Key: How Kamala Harris Is Leading the Race to the White House

Kamala Harris is now leading in key dairy states. What does this mean for the 2024 election and dairy farmers? Keep reading to find out.

Summary: The 2024 US presidential election is heating up, with dairy-producing states taking center stage. Initially, President Biden was trailing in key states like Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Michigan, where former President Trump held a slight lead. However, with Vice President Kamala Harris now the Democratic nominee, the dynamics have shifted. According to a recent New York Times/Siena College poll, Harris leads in Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin by a slim margin. She’s also gaining ground in Arizona, North Carolina, Nevada, and Georgia. Political expert Lynn Vavreck from UCLA stresses that the race is still wide open, suggesting that any shift could be pivotal. The outcome in these critical states will likely decide the presidency, making every vote crucial. The 2024 election could significantly impact dairy farmers. Harris’ potential policies include climate action and expanding financing for sustainable agriculture. Her labor and trade proposals could influence costs and workforce stability. While environmental rules could tighten, her support for small and medium farms might offer much-needed assistance. Balancing ecological responsibility and economic viability will be key.

  • President Biden initially trailed in key dairy states; former President Trump had a slight lead.
  • With Kamala Harris as the Democratic nominee, dynamics have shifted with her leading in Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin.
  • Harris is also gaining ground in Arizona, North Carolina, Nevada, and Georgia.
  • Political expert Lynn Vavreck suggests the race remains wide open and any shift could be pivotal.
  • The election outcome in key states will likely decide the presidency, making every vote crucial.
  • Harris’ potential policies include climate action and expanding financing for sustainable agriculture.
  • Her labor and trade proposals could impact costs and workforce stability for dairy farmers.
  • While environmental regulations might tighten under Harris, small and medium farms could receive more support.
  • Balancing ecological responsibility with economic viability will be essential.
2024 US presidential election, dairy farmers, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Michigan, Kamala Harris, swing states, electoral dynamics, policy reforms, climate policy, methane emissions, sustainable agriculture, government financing, green technologies, labor proposals, immigration restrictions, minimum wage, labor rules, small and medium-sized farmers, trade policies, environmental restrictions, economic viability, biofuel programs.

Have you ever considered the profound influence your vote could have on the future of our country? This question is particularly pertinent for dairy farmers across the critical states of Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Michigan. These states, known for their dairy production, also hold the key to determining the future leadership of the United States . As we delve into the latest polling data, one fact becomes increasingly clear: Kamala Harris’ potential lead in these crucial dairy-producing states could be a game-changer for the 2024 US presidential election. ‘The trends are crucial, but November is still a long way off. In a close election, any factor could alter the result in a state or overall,’ warns Lynn Vavreck, Marvin Hoffenberg Professor of American Politics and Public Policy at UCLA.

The Shifting Landscape: Battleground States and the 2024 Election

Have you observed any changes in the battleground states as we approach the election? It’s been quite the whirlwind. According to a recent New York Times/Siena College survey conducted from August 5-9, Democratic candidate Kamala Harris leads by 4% in the critical dairy-producing states of Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin, with a 50% to 46% edge over her opponent. This move has the potential to reshape the electoral dynamics.

And that is not all. According to the same survey from August 8 to 15, Harris has made significant gains in the Sun Belt. For example, she leads Arizona 50% to 45% and North Carolina 49% to 47%. These improvements are significant because they reflect increasing support in usually swing states.

Impact on Dairy Farmers: Election Results Matter

So, what does a Harris administration mean for you as a dairy farmer? Election results may pave the way for policy reforms that either support or threaten your everyday operations and long-term viability. Let’s look at what is ahead.

First up is climate policy. Harris has been outspoken about taking dramatic action to combat climate change. This might lead to more robust controls on methane emissions, which make up a significant component of emissions from animals like cattle. While this is a barrier, it has the potential to spur innovation. For instance, stricter regulations could push us towards adopting more sustainable practices that will ultimately benefit the environment and industry. However, it’s important to note that these changes might also increase operating costs and require significant adjustments in farming practices.

Furthermore, Harris’ administration may expand government financing for sustainable agricultural efforts, which could significantly benefit the dairy business. According to Lynn Vavreck of UCLA, ‘Federal investment in green technologies could make it easier for farmers to transition without bearing the full cost themselves.’ This potential support offers a glimmer of hope for the future of dairy farming.

Furthermore, Harris’ labor proposals might directly affect you. Plans to alter immigration restrictions might lead to a more stable workforce, which is critical for labor-intensive dairy farming businesses. For instance, Chegg’s pledge to train 100,000 Hondurans by 2030 emphasizes the significance of improving immigration regulations to ensure a competent workforce. However, it’s important to consider the potential impact of these changes on operating costs and the overall structure of the dairy farming workforce.

However, only some things are going well. Potential rises in the minimum wage and harsher labor rules may raise operating expenses. However, many claim that improved working conditions increase productivity—investing in your personnel may pay dividends.

So, what is the bottom line? The 2024 election is a watershed moment for dairy producers. Stay aware, adapt, and seek possibilities within the problems. According to Medeiros, farming has always required adaptability. “This election will be no different.”

What’s Next for Dairy Farmers in the 2024 Election? 

As we navigate this volatile election season, we must understand dairy farmers’ issues and objectives in vital states. Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Michigan are more than simply political battlegrounds; they are also the dairy production hubs of the United States. So, what does Kamala Harris’ leadership mean for you?

First, let’s discuss agricultural subsidies. Many dairy producers depend on these subsidies to maintain financial stability. Harris, who has previously backed extended relief packages, may advocate for more extensive assistance for small and medium-sized farmers. Her attitude might directly influence your bottom line, offering a buffer in unpredictable market circumstances.

Trade policies are also a significant source of worry. Harris proposes renegotiating trade agreements to safeguard American farmers better. If you are concerned about foreign competition and unfair trade practices, her administration might benefit you. Improved trade agreements provide new markets and level the field with foreign dairy imports.

Environmental restrictions often cause disagreement. Harris has been passionate about pursuing green policies, which may result in tighter environmental rules for dairy farms. While some contend this may raise operating expenses, others feel it represents a long-term road to sustainable agricultural techniques. It’s important to consider the potential impact of these changes on operating costs and the overall structure of the dairy farming industry. For example, her backing for biofuel programs might increase demand for dairy byproducts, which could be a potential opportunity for the industry.

Finally, the policies and initiatives of a Harris government may provide both possibilities and problems. What are your thoughts? Do these policies reflect your objectives as a dairy farmer?

Expert Opinions: The High-Stakes Game

Understanding the political scene is as crucial as understanding the newest market developments for dairy producers throughout America. Political analyst Lynn Vavreck, the Marvin Hoffenberg Professor of American Politics and Public Policy at UCLA, provides vital insights into the present political landscape. This knowledge empowers farmers to make informed decisions about their future.

Vavreck emphasizes the razor-thin margins: “This election was expected to be a close one, and the recent swing toward Harris has tightened up the race,” she says. “It looks as it should: like a very close contest.” Her sentiments resonate with every farmer who has seen the markets swing on a knife’s edge.

But here’s the kicker: the campaign is still in its early stages, and November is far off. Vavreck concurs: “In a close election, literally anything could change the result in a state or overall.” So, what does this imply for central dairy-producing states such as Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania? These states are more than battlegrounds; they are the linchpins of the 2024 presidential election.

Vavreck asserts: “The winner of the 2024 election will more than likely need to win all of these states to become president.” For dairy farmers, this is more than just political rhetoric; it is a demand to be aware and active, as the stakes could not be more significant.

The Power Trio: Why Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania Can Decide the Presidency

Regarding the Electoral College, Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania are often crucial to any presidential election plan. Why are these states so important? Their combined 46 electoral votes may make or break a candidate’s route to victory, which requires 270 votes.

Historically, these were the ultimate swing states. Consider the 2016 election, when Donald Trump won Michigan by 0.23%, Wisconsin by 0.76%, and Pennsylvania by 0.72%—margins that combined gave him the president. In 2020, Joe Biden recaptured these states with close victories, changing the Electoral College balance again. This variation emphasizes their importance as battlegrounds where elections are contested and often won or lost.

So, why are these states so dynamic? Demographically, they are a mix of urban and rural communities and industrial and agricultural sectors, making them microcosms of national trends. Because of this variety, politicians must address various voter issues, including job growth, healthcare, and environmental policy.

Recent polling data has shown how close the 2024 race remains in certain states. According to an August New York Times/Siena College survey, Harris leads by only 4% in all three categories. This narrow advantage emphasizes how unpredictable and significant these nations remain.

Understanding the electoral dynamics in Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania is more than simply electoral strategy; it is critical for any candidate seeking the presidency. These states are essential to those of us in the dairy business since the result of this ever-critical contest affects our lives.

Rust Belt Roulette: How Dairy States Are Shaping Presidential Elections

Historically, dairy states such as Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, and Michigan have had a significant role in deciding the result of US presidential elections. These states, dubbed the “Rust Belt,” have shifted between Democratic and Republican inclinations. For example, in 2016, these central dairy states were essential in Donald Trump’s unexpected victory, as he converted them from their previous Democratic support in 2012 when President Obama achieved a triumph.

Dairy producers’ voting tendencies have also shifted significantly. Rural voters, including many dairy sector workers, traditionally supported the Republican Party. However, economic issues in the dairy business, such as shifting milk prices, trade policy, and labor shortages, have begun influencing voting habits. Disillusioned by recent trade battles that harmed their bottom line, some farmers reevaluated their political allegiances. In 2020, Joe Biden recovered Pennsylvania and Michigan, although barely.

As we approach the 2024 election, these historical developments provide critical insights. Dairy farmers, who are increasingly outspoken about climate change, dairy subsidies, and immigration policy, might significantly impact the election results. The data showing Vice President Kamala Harris leading in these states implies that current economic and policy challenges are more relevant to dairy farmers’ objectives than ever.

Understanding these past tendencies allows us to forecast the current election cycle. Dairy farmers’ votes will be widely watched if history repeats itself as they react to critical concerns directly affecting their livelihoods.

The Bottom Line

As we negotiate the convoluted path to the 2024 election, it’s evident that dairy-producing states like Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania hold the keys to the presidency. Kamala Harris’ latest poll rise highlights the importance and volatility of these contested states. Your vote is crucial in this contest, which is razor-thin. So, dairy producers, will your vote tip the scales?

Learn more:

U.S. Milk Production Dips: A Look Behind the Numbers

Is the U.S. running out of milk? Find out the troubling trends impacting dairy farmers and the future of milk production. Read more now.

Summary: Brace yourself, dairy farmers, for a deep dive into the latest trends shaping our industry. July 2024 has ushered in a subtle yet significant shift in U.S. milk production, marking the thirteenth consecutive month of decline. The USDA’s recent report shows a 0.4% decrease year-over-year, with the major milk states producing 18.171 billion pounds—a slight dip from July 2023. Despite a minor increase in production per cow, the overall number of milked cows decreased, driving this downward trend. California still tops the charts, but Texas surprises with a notable production boost. In July, the top 24 states saw a reduction in output by 0.2%, although per-cow productivity rose slightly. Key states like California and Idaho recorded drops, but Texas outperformed with a 6% rise in output due to herd expansion and better yields. Factors like tight heifer supplies, high beef prices, and hot summer temperatures are complicating herd expansion, pushing dairy commodity prices upwards. So, what’s really happening on our farms, and how can we navigate this complexity? Let’s explore.

  • US milk production continues to decline, marking the thirteenth consecutive month of reduced output.
  • USDA’s report shows a 0.4% decrease in year-over-year production in July 2024, with a total of 18.171 billion pounds.
  • Despite a slight increase in per-cow production, a reduction in the number of milked cows is driving the downward trend.
  • California remains the top producer, while Texas saw a surprising 6% increase in milk production due to herd expansion and improved yields.
  • Tight heifer supplies, high beef prices, and hot summer temperatures are complicating herd expansion efforts.
  • Dairy commodity prices are rising, affected by the tight supply and challenging conditions faced by producers.
milk output, United States, top 24 milk-producing states, dairy herd, climatic conditions, USDA, productivity per cow, California, Wisconsin, Michigan, efficiency, production, reductions, Idaho, Minnesota, Texas, dairy slaughter rates, heifer supply, beef prices, health difficulties, average yields, supply crunch, cheese, butter, consumer pricing, export opportunities, scaling up output, aging herd

Did you know that in July 2024, the United States experienced a significant 0.2% decrease in milk output? According to the USDA, the top 24 milk-producing states produced 18.171 billion pounds of milk, reflecting a subtle but impactful shift in the industry. As our dairy herd diminishes and climatic conditions change, we can’t help but worry about what the future holds for the dairy sector. “The USDA reduced its 2024 and 2025 milk production forecasts, suggesting that the sector may face more problems. Stay ahead by being informed.” — USDA Report for August 2024. As dairy producers, understanding the milk production environment helps us negotiate the complexity of our profession. So, let’s talk about what’s going on and what it implies for you and your farm.

MonthMilk Production (Billion Pounds) – 2023Milk Production (Billion Pounds) – 2024Year-over-Year Change (%)
January19.12518.950-0.91%
February17.80817.685-0.69%
March19.45019.210-1.23%
April19.81519.530-1.44%
May20.01019.770-1.20%
June19.64519.310-1.70%
July18.99018.915-0.40%

Milking More from Less: Navigating Dairy’s Subtle Shifts 

Milk production patterns show a small but significant change for dairy producers. According to the USDA’s most current figures, milk output in the top 24 milk-producing states fell by 0.2% from last year. On a bigger scale, overall US milk output fell by 0.4%.

Interestingly, average productivity per cow climbed somewhat, indicating a trend toward efficiency despite overall reductions. Each cow produced an average of 2,047 pounds of milk, a two-pound increase from the previous year. However, these improvements were countered by a decline in milk cows, which fell from 8.909 million to 8.878 million.

As dairy producers manage these challenges, the emphasis on individual cow production becomes more important. Do you see any comparable fluctuations in your herd’s productivity? What tactics are you using to adapt to these shifting dynamics?

California Dominates, But Texas Takes a Surprising Leap

StateProduction (Billion Pounds)Change from July 2023Average Production per Cow (Pounds)
California3.3-0.3%2,112
Wisconsin2.6-0.1%2,142
Michigan1.1-0.9%2,178
Texas1.58+6%2,073
Idaho1.22-1%2,032

Regarding state performance, California remains the leader in milk output and herd size. California’s extensive resources and infrastructure lead the way in dairy production.

Wisconsin, known for its dairy business, continues to do well, ranking second in output and herd size. However, like many other states, Wisconsin is not immune to the industry’s gradual decline.

Michigan stands out as having the highest per-cow average. This reflects the state’s focus on efficiency and production, which means each cow’s contribution is significant.

Despite these regions of strength, other states have seen reductions. California witnessed a 0.3% reduction in production, while Idaho’s dropped by 1%. In the Midwest, Michigan’s output fell by 0.9%, Minnesota’s by 4%, and Wisconsin’s by 0.1%.

On a positive note, Texas outperformed the trend with a remarkable 6% rise in output. This jump, driven by an 18,000-cow increase and improved yields, indicates a solid rebound from previous struggles and is a beacon of hope in the industry’s current challenges.

The Silent Shrinking Herd: Behind the Dip in Milk Production

The smaller dairy herd is a significant reason influencing lower milk output. The fall in cow numbers corresponds to a decrease in milk yield. In July 2024, the number of cows milked declined to 8.878 million from 8.909 million the previous year. This decrease may seem tiny, but its influence on total productivity is enormous.

Dairy slaughter rates exacerbate the problem. Producers have attempted to maintain herd levels, but limited heifer supply and high beef prices impede growth. Even with a healthy margin, these variables restrict the potential to add additional productive cows to the herd. As a result, barns stay less complete than anticipated, reducing milk production potential.

Then there’s the problem of the aging herd and ongoing animal health concerns. As cows age, their output naturally falls. When combined with health difficulties, the productivity per cow might drop even lower. While average yields rose by 0.1% in July, this rise was insufficient to balance losses due to lower herd size. These health and aging issues are expected to have a more significant long-term impact on productivity.

When Weather Wears Down: The Heat Wave Impact

Understanding the significant impact of weather on milk production is crucial for dairy producers. Hot temperatures significantly reduced milk quantities this summer, notably in the West and Upper Midwest. California, the milk production powerhouse, witnessed a 0.3% reduction, while Idaho saw less than a 1% drop. Michigan, Minnesota, and Wisconsin recorded reductions of 0.9%, 4%, and 0.1%, respectively. Extreme heat affects cows, lowering their feed intake and milk supply. These weather trends are not random variations but rather significant issues that dairy producers must confront. Even the best-managed herds cannot sustain peak production levels as temperatures rise.

Extreme heat affects cows, lowering their feed intake and milk supply. These weather trends are not random variations but rather significant issues that dairy producers must confront. Even the best-managed herds cannot sustain peak production levels as temperatures rise.

Supply Crunch Driving Up Dairy Prices: Can Farmers Keep Up? 

It’s no surprise that restricted milk supply is driving up dairy commodities and milk prices. When supply falls, the fundamental economics of demand and supply come into play. Less milk implies less raw material for dairy products, like cheese and butter. As a consequence, prices for these goods automatically rise. According to the USDA, a continuing reduction in herd size and lower milk output impacts everything from consumer pricing to export opportunities [USDA Milk Output Report, July 2024].

However, dairy producers confront considerable obstacles when they scale up output. First, low heifer supply and high beef prices make it difficult for producers to grow their herds. Farmers face a balancing act; they want to keep their barns full, but economic circumstances are only sometimes favorable. Furthermore, ongoing health difficulties and an aging herd will further reduce output. This delicate balance gets more complicated with an 18.000-cow rise in specific locations, indicating that other areas struggle to sustain populations [USDA Report].

Because of these complicating circumstances, the anticipated supply response is limited. Producers are unwilling to grow in an uncertain market, mainly when insufficient profits cover expenditures. Hot summer temperatures have also hurt milk production in the West and Upper Midwest. Challenges like these indicate that rising pricing pressure on dairy goods and milk will likely continue in the foreseeable future. Understanding these processes helps farmers navigate these economic waves more effectively.

From Price Hikes to Plant Milk: Navigating Consumer Trends in Dairy 

Consumer demand and market changes are critical in determining the dairy industry’s landscape. As milk output falls, it’s no wonder that prices begin to increase. Reduced supply naturally causes upward pressure on pricing, which may be beneficial and detrimental. On the one hand, higher prices may result in more significant margins for dairy producers; conversely, they may discourage customers from buying as much dairy as they would otherwise.

Have you noticed that your dairy products have become more expensive lately? This is a direct outcome of the reduced milk production rates we’ve been experiencing. However, consumer behavior is multidimensional. When prices rise, people sometimes respond by purchasing fewer amounts or choosing less costly alternatives. This change may be minor, but it has long-term implications for total demand.

In terms of alternatives, the plant-based milk market continues to rise. According to recent projections, the worldwide plant-based milk industry is predicted to grow to $21.52 billion by 2024. This spike is primarily due to increasing health awareness and dietary choices. So, what does this imply for the dairy farmers?

So, it’s a call to adapt. The emergence of plant-based alternatives does not signal death for the dairy business. Still, farmers must be more intelligent about market trends. Diversifying product lines to include value-added dairy products or investigating niche markets such as organic or A2 milk might be helpful. Furthermore, increasing farm-level efficiency might help mitigate some issues caused by shifting market needs.

The bottom line is that recognizing and reacting to shifting customer preferences and market trends will be necessary. Embracing innovation and anticipating market expectations may help dairy producers convert obstacles into opportunities.

Strategic Planning Amidst Shifting Projections: Your Blueprint for Resilience 

The USDA’s latest modification of milk production predictions presents a cautious future picture. The forecasts for 2024 and 2025 have been reduced, indicating that sustaining supply levels may continue to be complicated. As a dairy farmer, this information is more than background noise; it’s an essential indicator for strategic planning. The subsequent supply and demand figures, due on September 12th, will give more information.

Keeping up with these changes is critical. Understanding how national and global changes affect milk production may help you make choices that keep your operations robust. By staying ahead of the curve, you may strategically position yourself for success, whether altering herd size, investing in efficiency, or exploring new markets.

The Bottom Line

Dairy producers must remain aware and agile as they negotiate a terrain defined by diminishing herds, unpredictable productivity, and constant weather concerns. The surprise increase in milk output in Texas and the steady reduction in regions such as California and Wisconsin underscore the industry’s geographical heterogeneity. Furthermore, the impact of tighter supply on dairy prices must be considered.

Understanding these patterns is essential for flourishing in a competitive market, not simply surviving. The capacity to predict and adapt to these changes can influence your bottom line. Climate change, commercial needs, and changing customer tastes all contribute to a dynamic future for dairy production.

Are you ready to adapt to the ever-changing landscape? Your choices now will influence the resilience and sustainability of your business tomorrow.

Learn more: 

Record-High US Agricultural Land Values in 2024

Get the scoop on 2024’s record-high farmland values. How can dairy farmers manage these rising costs to ensure their farm’s future?

Summary: The 2024 USDA Land Values report indicates that farm real estate values have increased to $4,170 per acre, up 5% from last year. Florida experienced the most significant rise at 13.4%, while Wisconsin’s values remained unchanged. Since 2010, cropland and pastureland have surged by 106% and 73%, respectively, with notable increases in states like Tennessee, Ohio, Florida, and Virginia. Factors such as limited availability, high yields, and historically low interest rates have driven these increases, though stabilization is anticipated with rising interest rates and lower commodity prices. The most expensive farmland is found in the Northeast, with Rhode Island’s prices peaking at $22,000 per acre. This trend may encourage dairy producers to seek more affordable areas like Wisconsin.

  • 2024 farm real estate values have risen to an average of $4,170 per acre, a 5% increase from the previous year.
  • Florida experienced the highest year-over-year increase in land values at 13.4%.
  • Wisconsin’s farm real estate values remained flat, showing no increase in the past year.
  • Cropland values have increased by 106% since 2010, while pastureland values have increased by 73% in the same period.
  • Key states with notable increases in land values include Tennessee, Ohio, Florida, and Virginia.
  • Historically, low interest rates, high yields, and limited availability of land are primary factors driving up land values.
  • The Northeast region has the most expensive farmland, with Rhode Island reaching $22,000 per acre.
  • Stabilization in land values is expected due to rising interest rates and lower commodity prices.
  • High land costs might prompt dairy farmers to explore more affordable land in states like Wisconsin.
agricultural real estate values, average prices per acre, dairy producers, grazing, feed production, farm real estate value, USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service, record-high values, financial bottom line, strategic strategy, Florida, Tennessee, Virginia, Wisconsin, Rhode Island, cropland, pastureland, high demand, limited supply, Northeast, Ohio, Tennessee, dairy enterprises, quality farmland, farming technology, crop types, interest rates, borrowing, investment in agricultural land

Have you observed an increase in agricultural land values recently? In our comprehensive ‘Agricultural Industry Analysis ‘, we found that in 2024, agricultural real estate values increased to an average of $4,170 per acre, representing the fourth consecutive year of growth. This tendency is significant for dairy producers who depend mainly on land for grazing and feed production. Are you prepared for the rising costs? The USDA’s National Agricultural Statistics Service states, “Since 2010, the total farm real estate value has risen by a staggering 94%.” Understanding these record-high values is critical because they influence everything from your financial bottom line to strategic strategy. Stay knowledgeable and adaptive as you handle these economic upheavals.

In 2024, the average agricultural real estate value was $4,170 per acre, a 5% increase from the previous year. Cropland prices grew to $5,570 per acre, up $250, while pasture prices rose to $1,830 per acre, a $90 rise. Florida witnessed the most significant increase, up 13.4%, pushing average prices to $8,300 per acre. Tennessee and Virginia followed with advances of 10.7% and 10.4%, respectively. Surprisingly, no state saw a fall in land values, with Wisconsin’s prices remaining unchanged at $6,120 per acre. In the Northeast, Rhode Island had the highest cost per acre, at $22,000.

These changes have been fueled by housing scarcity and record-low mortgage rates.

StateAverage Farm Real Estate Value per Acre (2024)Year-over-Year Increase (%)
Florida$8,30013.4%
Tennessee$7,50010.7%
Virginia$6,90010.4%
Wisconsin$6,1200%
California$13,4002.3%
Rhode Island$22,0006%

A Tale of Two Lands: Cropland vs. Pastureland 

The remarkable difference in cropland and pastureland value has risen over the last decade. Cropland prices have increased by 106% since 2010, owing to high demand and limited supply, whereas pastureland has risen by just 73%. This distinction emphasizes diverse market dynamics in the agriculture industry. In Florida, farmland expenses increased by 9.5% last year, while pastureland values increased by 12.7%, highlighting regional differences in land value increases.

High land prices in the Northeast may drive dairy producers to more economical places. Wisconsin, for example, has constant property prices of $6,120 per acre, making it appealing to stability seekers. Tennessee and Virginia, despite double-digit increases, are still doable at $4,750 and $5,800 per acre, respectively. With a 13.4% rise to $8,300 per acre, Florida’s favorable environment continues to attract farmers.

Rising farmland values in locations such as Ohio and Tennessee may cause dairy enterprises to relocate to areas with less expensive pasture land. Considering these variables, where will the next dairy farming boom occur? Are the dangers worth the possible benefits? This shift in the industry landscape could present new opportunities for growth and success.

Why Farmland Values Keep Surging: Scarcity, Technology, and Low Interest Rates 

Several significant variables have influenced agricultural land prices during the last decade. One of the most crucial is the scarcity of quality farmland. As cities grow and land suited for agriculture becomes scarcer, the demand for existing farmland rises, boosting its value. This shortage has been especially severe in highly populated areas, where farmland is often transformed into residential or commercial space.

High yields have also helped to drive up the value of agricultural land. Thanks to advances in farming technology and better crop types, farmers can now produce more with the same amount of land. This results in better profitability per acre, placing such land in high demand. Modern agricultural land is very productive, inevitably increasing its market value.

Historically, low interest rates for most of the last decade have made borrowing more inexpensive, encouraging increased investment in agricultural land. With lower-interest loans, both incumbent farmers eager to expand and new entrants to the market have been able to acquire more land, driving up demand and prices. Despite recent interest rate rises, the general rising trend in land prices has continued. These forces have produced a powerful combination that has driven agricultural land prices to historic highs, creating difficulties and possibilities for existing landowners and investors.

The Calm After the Storm? Navigating the Shifting Landscape of Agricultural Land Values 

Agricultural land prices have steadily increased owing to restricted availability, good returns, and historically low interest rates. However, recent events, such as rising interest rates and a drop in commodity prices, may indicate stable land values. Dairy producers are certainly wondering what this means for them.

As borrowing costs rise with increased interest rates, this often serves as a cooling mechanism for high asset values, primarily agricultural land. While land prices are unlikely to fall drastically, this trend may make property purchases more financially accessible than in previous years. This slowing of expansion may give a much-needed break for farmers aiming to expand or newcomers to farming.

Stabilization comes at a vital moment since commodity prices are also falling. This limits the earning potential of agricultural land, which may restrict the rise of land value. This translates to a more stable market environment for dairy producers, allowing for more significant financial planning and less competitive pressure on land acquisitions. Staying educated and informed about these changes may help you gain a competitive advantage as you navigate this ever-changing marketplace.

A Milking Dilemma: Navigating Rising Land Costs in the Dairy Industry

Like many others in the agriculture industry, dairy producers are suffering the effects of increased land prices. These expenses may substantially influence profitability, operational choices, and long-term planning initiatives.

Profitability Concerns: Higher land prices increase initial expenditures for dairy farming businesses. This may lead to higher debt burdens or financial distress, particularly for new entrants to the industry. Furthermore, rising land prices might cut into current farmers’ profits, making it challenging to continue viable operations. With milk prices often fluctuating, the tight financial rope grows thinner.

Operational Decisions: The rising value of agricultural land may compel dairy producers to reconsider their operating strategy. For example, they may need to optimize land usage more rigorously, maybe transitioning to more intense agricultural practices to maximize yield from fewer areas. Alternatively, some farmers may explore diversifying their revenue sources and introducing supplementary agricultural operations to help offset rising expenses.

Long-term Planning: When preparing for the future, high land prices substantially impede expansion. Increasing herd levels and updating infrastructure may be costly. Furthermore, succession planning, which is critical for family-run dairy farms, becomes more problematic. Passing down an increasingly valued asset may place further financial constraints on the following generation.

Dairy producers are stuck between increasing land values and fluctuating commodity prices. It’s a problematic climate that needs strategic changes to remain successful. Whether investing in technology to increase productivity or exploring alternative financing alternatives, dairy producers must seek inventive ways to manage these challenging times.

The Bottom Line

The growing trend in agricultural land prices shows no signs of stopping in 2024. The average agricultural real estate value is now $4,170 per acre, up 5% from last year and representing a 94% growth since 2010. Regional inequalities are apparent, with the Northeast and California having much greater land values than other states. Notably, Florida saw the most significant year-over-year gain, with a 13.4% increase in land value. This growing trend is driven by limited land supply, strong returns, and historically low loan rates. However, recent interest rate rises may indicate near-term stability. Think about how these events will affect your long-term plans and financial choices. With land prices so high, how will you adjust to the new agricultural landscape?

Learn more: 

$200 Million Massive Expansions in New York & Wisconsin

How will $200 million in expansions by Upstate Niagara and Grande Cheese impact your farm’s future?

Summary: Have you ever wondered how expanding dairy operations in New York and Wisconsin could impact your farm? Upstate Niagara Cooperative‘s $150 million expansion in West Seneca, New York, and Grande Cheese Company’s renovation and 60,000-square-foot expansion in Wisconsin aim to meet growing consumer demand, adding around 450 new jobs and boosting production capacity. This means more opportunities for dairy contracts and potentially higher milk prices, with Upstate Niagara expecting a 54% increase in employment and Grande’s new facility set to be the third-largest in their network.

  • Dairy operations expansion in New York and Wisconsin promises to impact local dairy farms significantly.
  • Upstate Niagara Cooperative’s $150 million project is expected to add 250,000 square feet to its facility in West Seneca and increase employment by 54%.
  • Grande Cheese Company’s Wisconsin expansion includes 20,000 square feet of renovations and 60,000 square feet of new construction, with the facility becoming the third-largest in their network.
  • Both expansions aim to meet growing consumer demand, creating approximately 450 new jobs combined.
  • Potential benefits for dairy farmers include more opportunities for contracts and possibly higher milk prices.

Two major participants, Upstate Niagara Cooperative and Grande Cheese Company, are driving a $200 million growth in New York and Wisconsin. These dramatic additions provide 330,000 square feet of new and refurbished space and approximately 450 new jobs. This expansion is more than simply boosting production capacity; it is also about satisfying rising customer demand for high-quality dairy products. For dairy producers, this means more demand for milk, improved market stability, and higher pricing. The consequences of these investments will indeed affect your bottom line, making this an opportunity you cannot afford to pass up.

Upstate Niagara’s $150 Million Expansion

Upstate Niagara Cooperative is preparing for a significant makeover with a $150 million expansion in West Seneca, New York. Consider a 250,000-square-foot extension that seamlessly integrates with their existing 222,851-square-foot business. This is more than simply expanding room; it is a purposeful initiative to address rising customer demand for cottage cheese and Greek yogurt.

Beyond output, this development is expected to significantly boost employment, with a 54% increase in staff size, bringing the total to 370. This is more than just bricks and mortar; it’s about invigorating the local economy and creating opportunities for qualified individuals in the community. This positive ripple effect is something we can all look forward to.

This economic boom in Upstate Niagara provides some optimism for dairy producers. Increased processing capacity may lead to more contracts and higher milk prices, solving the business’s overproduction difficulties. Expansions like this help balance supply and demand in dairy farming.

Grande Cheese’s Bold Move: Major Renovation and Expansion in Wisconsin

Grande Cheese Company’s recent groundbreaking event in Wisconsin was nothing short of historic for the dairy industry. This ceremony started substantial repairs and development at the recently purchased Chilton property. The project involves 20,000 square feet of modifications and 60,000 square feet of new construction, all to increase their mozzarella cheese manufacturing capacities. Once the dust settles and the ribbon is broken, the newly renovated facility will be the third-largest in Grande’s network, bringing new possibilities and development to the area. The expansion will update the infrastructure and produce 75 employees, combining new hiring and current Grande transfers. This deliberate step indicates a forward-thinking strategy to meet growing needs while promoting community development.

What This Means for Dairy Farmers: Opportunities and Challenges 

These expansion initiatives will substantially impact New York and Wisconsin dairy producers—increased production capacity increases milk demand. Upstate Niagara Cooperative’s expansion, which aims to expand cottage cheese and Greek yogurt production, is expected to result in more milk purchases from local farmers. Similarly, Grande Cheese Company’s new plant will need more milk to produce mozzarella cheese, resulting in increased demand.

Increased demand may lead to higher milk prices, a welcome change for dairy producers facing financial challenges. But these developments are not just about higher prices; they also open up new business possibilities. Imagine the potential for contracts or collaborations with these growing businesses, providing a consistent cash stream. This is an exciting time for the dairy industry.

However, these advancements are not without hurdles. While primary cooperatives develop, smaller farmers may need help to meet rising production needs and more means to extend their businesses. Overproduction may still be a worry, as seen earlier when farmers were forced to discard milk owing to a lack of processing facilities. Farmers must consider these aspects and adjust their strategy to take advantage of the changing terrain. They may need to invest in more efficient production methods or seek new markets to compete in this evolving landscape.

The Bottom Line

As previously noted, Upstate Niagara and Grande Cheese are investing significantly in expanding their facilities in New York and Wisconsin. These additions are expected to generate hundreds of jobs and increase manufacturing capacity for cottage cheese, Greek yogurt, and mozzarella products. These technologies have the potential to change the dairy sector as a whole. The real issue is, what does this imply for dairy producers like you? While these expansions might open up new markets and stabilize pricing, they highlight the significance of responding to a changing industrial environment. This environment is characterized by increasing demand for high-quality dairy products, technological advancements in production, and a shift towards more extensive, efficient operations. These shifts can transform existing obstacles into new possibilities with the appropriate methods. The risks have never been more significant, and the prospects may never have been more crucial.

Learn more:

Skyrocketing Dairy Cow Prices Hit All-Time High, Are You Prepared?

Skyrocketing cow prices got you worried? Find out what’s happening and how to avoid this financial challenge.

Summary: Hey there, do you ever feel like you’re shelling out more cash than ever for your replacement cows? Well, you’re not alone. According to the latest USDA estimates, prices for U.S. replacement dairy cows reached a record-breaking $2,360 per head in July 2024. That’s a whopping 34% increase from July 2023 and a 10% spike from April 2024. The surge isn’t limited to a few states—it’s happening across the board, affecting farmers from Wisconsin to Texas. Kansas, South Dakota, and Texas also felt the pinch. Why the spike? Limited heifer availability and slightly improved milk revenue margins drive these costs sky-high. The cull cow market also set a record-high average price of $138 per cwt in June 2024 due to fewer cows being slaughtered and a scarcity of heifers. Many dairy farms feel the heat and wonder about long-term impacts on their bottom line. 

  • The price of U.S. replacement dairy cows hit a record of $2,360 per head in July 2024, up 34% from the previous year.
  • Prices have surged by 10% since April 2024, affecting farmers nationwide, including Wisconsin, Kansas, South Dakota, and Texas.
  • Limited availability of heifers and slightly improved milk revenue margins are critical factors behind the price increase.
  • Average cull cow prices also reached a record high of $138 per cwt in June 2024, driven by reduced slaughter and heifer scarcity.
  • Many dairy farms are questioning the long-term effects on their financial health due to these rising costs.

Have you ever felt like the earth was moving under your feet? It may be, mainly if you are a dairy farmer. Replacement cow prices in July 2024 rose to an all-time high of $2,360 per head, a remarkable 10% rise from a few months before and a whopping 34% increase from the previous year. The increase in replacement cow prices is extraordinary. Farmers must be aware of the potential consequences. Rising prices may increase expenses and reduce profit margins for dairy farms. Are you prepared to manage these changes? Consider what this implies and how you may navigate these difficult times.

Dairy StateJuly 2023 PriceApril 2024 PriceJuly 2024 PriceYear-Over-Year Increase
Wisconsin$1,620$2,120$2,360$740
Ohio$1,650$2,100$2,360$710
Texas$1,660$2,110$2,360$700
Minnesota$1,660$2,100$2,360$700

Unprecedented Surge in Cow Prices: Are You Prepared for the Impact?

Okay, let’s go into the most recent USDA estimates. You’ve undoubtedly seen that costs for replacement dairy cows have skyrocketed. In July 2024, the average price reached an all-time high of $2,360 per person. To put things in perspective, that’s a $240 increase—or 10%—from the high in April 2024. And if we compare that to July 2023, the price has increased by $600, or 34%.

Consider this: this isn’t just a slight increase but a significant one. These data are more than numbers; they represent the economic challenges you likely face on your farm. But remember, you can adapt your budgets or make any operational changes. It’s a lot to take in, but you’re not alone.

Based on quarterly surveys of dairy producers in 24 core dairy states, the USDA’s estimates reflect national trends. These increases are not isolated incidents; all 24 central dairy states reported increased replacement cow costs this quarter. You are not alone in this.

Regional Price Hikes: Are You Feeling the Pinch, Too? 

Have you observed that the price increases must be more consistent across the board? Let’s examine some current geographical variances.

Kansas, South Dakota, and Texas see significant growth. Farmers in these areas are paying far more for replacement cows than a year ago. For example, in Texas and Minnesota, costs have risen by $700 per person. That’s a huge jump.

However, more than just the Southern states are feeling the pressure. Up north, Wisconsin experienced a $740 per capita gain, while Ohio isn’t far behind with a $710 jump. These figures may affect your bottom line, particularly if you desire to increase or replace portions of your herd.

These jumps are driven by limited heifer availability and higher milk revenue margins. It has a countrywide impact, increasing the cost of maintaining or expanding your herd.

So, what do you think? Are these geographical disparities unexpected, or did you anticipate prices growing uniformly everywhere?

What’s Fueling These Sky-High Cow Prices? Let’s Dive In! 

You’re undoubtedly wondering what’s driving the skyrocketing costs in the replacement cow market. The response focuses on significant trends in the dairy business.

First, let’s speak about replacement cows. In July 2024, the average price for these cows reached a record high of $2,360 per head. This is a massive increase from only a few months ago and a 34% increase from the previous year. Why has there been such a surge? This is due to a diminishing milking herd and inadequate replacement heifers. Defined, prices will rise when there is less supply and stable or increasing demand.

Then there’s the cull cow market, which reached a record-high average price of $138 per cwt in June 2024. This price increase follows the pattern of the previous month when prices had already broken records. One key reason is the reduction in the number of cows slaughtered. In June, only roughly 186,400 dairy cull cows were sold via U.S. slaughter factories, a considerable decrease from the previous year. With fewer cows being killed, those that remain demand a higher price.

Do you see a similar crunch on your farm? Due to the scarcity of heifers, everyone is hurrying to finish their barns, ultimately raising costs. It’s a complex cycle, but keeping educated might help you navigate the rough seas more efficiently.

How are you responding to these trends? Share your methods, and let’s work through this together.

Feeling the Financial Heat: How Are These Sky-High Cow Prices Hitting Your Bottom Line? 

Now, speak about what’s important to you—how these price increases affect your pocketbook and farm operations. Do you feel the pinch yet? It’s no secret that replacing cows at these exorbitant costs may significantly impact your financial line. The effect is apparent for anybody managing a dairy farm, whether they operate a small operation with a few cows or a massive operation like Louriston Dairy.

Consider How the increase to $2,360 per person has impacted your budget. Are you rethinking your purchasing intentions now that prices have risen 34% from last year? These are crucial issues to consider. Increased expenses for replacement cows might result in lower profit margins and compel you to make difficult decisions. Do you postpone expanding to your herd, concentrate on improving the productive life of your current cows, or alter your breeding strategies?

These escalating expenditures can change your financial situation. According to the USDA, a decline in the sale of dairy cull cows and a scarcity of replacement heifers are significant causes. With fewer alternatives and more significant costs, each decision becomes more important. How are you dealing with the changes? Adjustments to your herd’s makeup and your farm’s long-term plans may be on the table.

Let’s Break Down the Numbers: What’s Happening? 

Let us go into the statistics. The USDA’s most recent quarterly forecasts show that replacement dairy cow costs in the United States will average $2,360 per head in July 2024. That’s up $240 from April 2024 and $600 from July 2023, for a 34% gain over the previous year.

These data were compiled from quarterly polls conducted in 24 central dairy states and an annual study that included all states. It is important to remember that these prices represent transactions for cows with at least one calf sold for replacement rather than culling.

The increase is not confined to replacement cows. Average cull cow prices in the United States have also increased. Cull cow prices were $138 per cwt in June 2024, hitting a new record high and up $6 from the average of $132 per cwt in May. This came after beating the previous record established in the second half 2014. 

When we focus on individual states, the price increases become much more pronounced. Wisconsin, for example, witnessed a $740 per capita rise, while Ohio’s rates increased by $710 per capita over the previous year. Texas and Minnesota’s replacement cow prices increased by $700 per head.

The delay in dairy cull cow marketing, caused partly by a reduced milking herd and a scarcity of replacement heifers, has also played a role. For example, in June 2024, the number of dairy cull cows sold via U.S. slaughter facilities decreased by 69,300 from the same month in 2023.

The Bottom Line

So, replacement cow prices reached an all-time high of $2,360 per head. This spike is seen across the central dairy states, and you’ve undoubtedly felt the pinch yourself. With cull cow prices also rising, the financial burden is palpable. Given these changes, considering the long-term implications for your dairy farm’s bottom line is critical. Are you ready to manage these changes, and can you afford not to adapt? It is time to rethink your strategy. Have you evaluated all your choices for remaining competitive in this turbulent market? Consider the actions you may take to ensure the long-term viability of your farm.

Learn more: 

The Hidden Crisis: Why U.S. Dairy Farms Are Disappearing Faster Than Ever!

U.S. dairy farms have shrunk by two-thirds while milk production rose—find out why this matters for farmers!

Summary: The decline of U.S. dairy farms over the past generation is staggeringly evident, with two-thirds disappearing, yet milk production has paradoxically surged by a third. This trend is driven by technological advancements and economic pressures, pushing family-operated farms to the brink. As small farms struggle against unsustainable milk prices and industry consolidation, the remaining farms leverage innovations such as automated milking systems and genetic breakthroughs to boost production. With regions like the Midwest and Northeast hardest hit—Wisconsin alone lost nearly half its dairy farms from 2003 to 2020—the story underscores an urgent need for new strategies to ensure a sustainable and thriving future for all stakeholders in the dairy industry.

Key Takeaways:

  • Family dairy farms in the U.S. have drastically diminished, with two out of three vanishing within a generation.
  • Despite the decline in the number of farms, milk production has increased by a third due to technological advancements.
  • Innovation and efficiency improvements are helping remaining dairy farms thrive, even as smaller farms disappear.
  • Small dairy farms face significant economic challenges, often driven by market pressures and consolidation within the industry.
  • Many small farms struggle with succession planning and engaging the next generation to continue the farming tradition.
  • Crisis in the dairy industry necessitates policy reforms, better access to credit and capital, and community support to ensure sustainability.
  • Consumer awareness and advocacy play crucial roles in championing the cause of small dairy farms and ensuring their survival.
  • The dairy industry’s future hinges on navigating economic pressures, leveraging new technologies, and supporting farming communities.

You may find it difficult to believe, yet two of every three dairy farms in the United States have closed during the last generation. You read it right: milk output has climbed by a remarkable one-third despite the tremendous migration. How can this be? In 1987, the U.S. had 202,068 dairy farms, but by 2017, the number had decreased to 54,000, according to the USDA. This contradictory pattern is more than a statistical aberration; it is a significant change with far-reaching repercussions for the dairy sector, rural economies, and food security. Understanding the forces driving this shift may help us navigate the future of agriculture. Furthermore, it gives insight into broader economic and technical developments in American agriculture, such as consolidation and automation.

YearNumber of Dairy FarmsTrend in Number of Dairy FarmsNumber of Dairy Cattle (in millions)Trend in Number of Dairy Cattle
200486,000Declining9.0Steady
200869,890Declining9.2Increasing
201251,481Declining9.3Increasing
201640,219Declining9.4Increasing
202034,187Declining9.4Steady
2024Estimated 29,000Declining9.5Steady

The Astonishing Decline of Family Dairy Farms: What’s Happening Behind the Scenes? 

The previous several decades have been revolutionary for the United States dairy business, with a significant decline in dairy farms. Since the 1970s, small, family-owned farms have decreased by approximately two-thirds. This considerable drop may be attributed to many main variables. Economic constraints have played an important part; as production costs have grown, it has been more difficult for smaller farms to compete with larger enterprises. Technological improvements have also transformed the sector. Innovations in milking technology, feed efficiency, and animal health have enabled more giant farms to attain previously unmatched production. For example, an ordinary cow now produces almost four times as much milk as it did in the 1950s.

Furthermore, consumer choices have altered market dynamics. An increasing demand for organic and sustainably derived goods frequently necessitates alternative manufacturing techniques and scale. These changes have contributed to the consolidation of dairy farms, favoring larger enterprises that can better absorb these complexity and expenses.

Survive and Thrive: The Dairy Industry’s Hidden Secret to Milk Production Boom Amid Farm Disappearance 

StateDecline in Dairy Farm Numbers (2003-2023)
Wisconsin58%
Pennsylvania45%
New York40%
California35%
Minnesota32%

The dairy business in the United States is exhibiting a paradoxical rise and collapse. According to the most recent USDA statistics, the number of dairy farms in the United States has plummeted, with two out of every three disappearing during the last generation. In sharp contrast, milk output has increased by one-third during the same time (USDA). Despite the decreasing number of farms, technological developments and better agricultural methods have allowed existing dairy farms to enhance output. A significant illustration of this efficiency is that the typical dairy cow now produces nearly four times more milk than its equivalent in the 1950s.

The decline has hardest hit the Midwest and Northeast regions in dairy farms. For example, Wisconsin, known as ‘America’s Dairyland,’ lost nearly half of its dairy farms from 2003 to 2020. New York experienced a similar 47% drop during the same period, while California, despite leading in milk production, saw its dairy farms reduced from around 2,100 in 2003 to about 1,300 in 2020. Texas and Pennsylvania also faced steep declines; Texas dairy farms plummeted from 1,200 to just 351 (a 71% drop), and Pennsylvania saw a 45% reduction in the number of dairy farms.

Technological Triumphs Propel Remaining U.S. Dairy Farms to New Heights Amid Decline 

While the number of dairy farms in the United States has decreased, technological developments have increased the output of those at record levels. The automated milking system (AMS) is a remarkable breakthrough in transforming farmers’ herd management practices. This technology reduces human effort, enables more frequent milking, and carefully monitors each cow’s health and productivity, resulting in significant gains in milk supply.

In addition to AMS, new feed formulations have had a significant effect. Modern feed technology contains precise nutritional ratios suited to dairy cows’ demands. This accurate feeding leads to healthier cows and, as a result, increased milk output. A well-balanced diet improves digestive efficiency and milk quality, so every drop counts.

Furthermore, genetic breakthroughs in dairy cattle have proven game changers. Dairy cows nowadays are significantly more productive than their ancestors because of selective breeding and genetic innovation. Genetic developments have allowed for the breeding of cows that give more milk and are more resistant to common diseases, increasing their productivity and efficiency.

These technical breakthroughs guarantee that, even as the number of dairy farms falls, total output rises, securing the industry’s future while maintaining a high milk quality and sustainability level.

The Economic Storm Farming Families Didn’t See Coming: Why Small Dairy Farms Are Disappearing in Droves 

YearNumber of Small Dairy FarmsPercentage Decline
200070,375N/A
200560,000-15%
201049,700-17%
201540,000-19.5%
202030,375-24%

The economic forces driving dairy farm consolidation are diverse, including changing milk prices, growing production costs, and the uncertain dynamics of international commerce. Over the last several decades, milk’s average price per hundredweight (cwt) has fluctuated significantly, affecting dairy producers’ revenue predictability. This economic unpredictability adds to the financial burden on smaller farms, which sometimes need more capital reserves to weather extended periods of low pricing.

Production costs have also risen, driven by rising feed prices, labor expenses, and the need for sophisticated agricultural technologies. According to the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), feed expenditures may account for up to 60% of a dairy farm’s overall production costs. This high expense makes it easier for smaller farms to stay sustainable while expanding their operations.

International commerce is also quite important. Global market developments and trade policy significantly impact the U.S. dairy business. Tariffs, trade agreements, and competitive pricing of dairy products from nations such as New Zealand and the European Union all influence local milk costs. The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) and its successor, the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA), have transformed the landscape by opening up new markets and bringing competition from imported items, sometimes with cheaper manufacturing costs.

These economic incentives encourage consolidation, with smaller farmers selling out or merging with more giant enterprises to gain economies of scale. Consolidation helps surviving farmers boost productivity and profitability in an increasingly competitive economy.

Pushed to the Breaking Point: Can Small Dairy Farms Survive the Industry’s Ruthless Evolution? 

YearAverage Herd Size
2003100
2008120
2013150
2018200
2023250

The reality for small dairy farmers is clear and frequently cruel. These family-run companies, such as the Wisconsin farm with 500 cows that sustain three generations, have battled to keep up with the dairy industry’s tectonic transformations. One crucial problem is the enormous amount of output necessary to stay sustainable. Advances in dairy farming technology have allowed more giant farms to boost production per cow tenfold, making it possible for smaller farms to compete by making matching expenditures, which are frequently prohibitively costly.

Furthermore, small farms are disproportionately affected by fluctuating milk prices and increased operating expenses. For example, some small farms that depend primarily on human labor may need help transferring to automated systems, which may be a substantial hurdle to obtaining the economies of scale required to remain viable. The emotional toll is also significant; for example, Emily, a fourth-generation farmer and U.S. Navy veteran, was forced to work as a heavy equipment operator owing to financial constraints on her family farm.

Despite these challenges, various assistance programs and efforts are in place to help small farmers maintain their competitiveness. The USDA gives grants and loans to small and medium-sized farms. The Beginning Farmer and Rancher Development Program (BFRDP) provides resources and instruction to young farmers, assisting them in developing skills necessary for contemporary agricultural techniques. Furthermore, municipal and state organizations routinely provide training and financial assistance to help small farm owners embrace new technology and enhance efficiency.

Furthermore, consumer awareness and direct-to-consumer sales have helped many small dairy farms survive. Small farms may gain higher price points for their goods by promoting them as artisanal or organic, reflecting the quality and attention they put into their operations. Community Supported Agriculture (CSA) programs and farmers’ markets enable small farms to engage directly with customers, encouraging loyalty and generating consistent cash sources.

Although small dairy farms confront significant obstacles, they are not without hope, thanks to a mix of assistance. With focused initiatives, inventive marketing methods, and a persistent dedication to quality, many are surviving and, in some instances, thriving in the ever-changing dairy sector environment.

The Dairy Industry at a Crossroads: Navigating Challenges and Seizing Opportunities for a Sustainable Future 

Looking forward, the dairy sector in the United States is at a crossroads, with a combination of problems and possibilities that can significantly impact its future terrain. One possible trend is rising customer demand for organic and specialized dairy products. Organic milk, for example, has witnessed an increase in demand as more people become health-conscious and ecologically aware. This move creates a potential niche market for dairy producers prepared to modify their techniques to fulfill organic certification requirements.

Furthermore, sustainability is becoming a crucial concern, with consumers and activist organizations calling for more environmentally friendly agricultural techniques. Methane reduction methods, rotational grazing, and water conservation strategies are examples of innovative approaches in this field. These sustainable approaches appeal to consumer tastes while providing farmers with long-term advantages such as cost savings and increased agricultural resilience.

Technology’s importance should be considered. Advanced dairy management software, automated milking equipment, and precision agricultural technologies are poised to improve the industry’s efficiency and output significantly. These advances might help smaller farms compete more successfully by lowering labor costs and increasing milk output.

New business models and diversification techniques may arise as young people get increasingly involved in farming. Agritourism, direct-to-consumer sales, and collaborations with local food systems are ways the dairy business may adapt to suit current needs while remaining profitable.

Finally, legislative reforms and government assistance will be critical factors. Incentives for sustainable practices, subsidies for technology adoption, and training initiatives to educate the next generation of farmers are all essential steps that guarantee the U.S. dairy business will survive and flourish in the years ahead.

The Bottom Line

Despite the massive collapse of family dairy farms, the U.S. dairy business has grown milk output, exhibiting remarkable resilience and ingenuity. Fewer farms have adopted technology and scalability to improve efficiency, yet small farmers face constant economic pressures, resulting in tough decisions and financial misery. The developing capabilities of the dairy business in the United States emphasize the need for adaptation for survival. As the sector faces turbulence, stakeholders—farmers, consumers, and legislators—must remain aware, involved, and aggressive in addressing continuing problems and opportunities, advocating for fair policies, and recognizing agriculture’s vital role.

Learn more: 

June Milk Production Down by 0.8%: USDA Report Highlights Dairy Trends

Explore the reasons behind the 0.8% decline in June milk production according to the USDA’s latest report. Uncover the evolving trends in the dairy industry and identify which states excel in milk yield per cow. Find out more.

Attention to our esteemed dairy farmers and industry stakeholders: Your role is pivotal in understanding and addressing the impact of diminishing milk production. The most recent USDA data shows a significant drop in milk production for June, indicating possible difficulties and possibilities for the dairy industry. We want to deconstruct these facts, explain their consequences, and thoroughly examine what this trend implies for you—according to the USDA, milk output in June declined by eight-tenths of a percent from the same month in 2023. Your understanding and proactive response to these trends are crucial for the industry’s future.

Join us as we delve into the following critical points: 

  • June Production Figures: Examining the 18 billion pounds of milk produced by the 24 central dairy states, which include major dairy-producing states such as California, Wisconsin, and Idaho. These states collectively account for a significant portion of the country’s milk production, making their production figures crucial for understanding the industry’s trends and dynamics. Revised Figures: The USDA’s updated May report shows 18.8 billion pounds of milk, also down eight-tenths of a percent from the previous year.
  • Quarterly Trends: Analysis of the total 2nd quarter production, which also saw a decrease.
  • Production per Cow: A look at the average milk yield per cow and changes from the previous year.
  • Herd Numbers: A snapshot of cow population trends across critical states.

This trend is important to dairy producers since it affects milk pricing, feed costs, and farm profitability. Understanding the entire scale of these manufacturing shifts will enable you to adjust your strategy better, prepare for the future, and minimize any hazards.

MonthTotal Production (Billion Pounds)Year-over-Year Change (%)Number of Cows (Million Head)Production per Cow (Pounds)
April19.1-0.88.882,153
May18.8-0.88.882,117
June18.0-0.88.882,025

June’s Milk Production Data Reveals Significant Fluctuations in the Dairy Industry 

The June milk production statistics indicate considerable swings in the dairy business, with the 24 central dairy-producing states generating 18 billion pounds of milk. This statistic represents a production amount and an eight-tenths of a percent decrease from the previous year, a significant change that underscores the need for adaptive techniques in dairy production to manage these negative trends.

USDA’s May Report Revision: A Critical Reassessment in the Dairy Sector

The USDA’s amendment of the May report makes a significant change, highlighting crucial changes in the dairy business. Initially published data have been amended to reflect a production volume of 18.8 billion pounds for May, a considerable fall of eight-tenths of a percent from the previous year. This modification more accurately depicts current market trends and shows the complex variables influencing milk production quantities throughout the country.

Second Quarter Analysis: A Reflection of Shifting Paradigms in Dairy Production 

The statistics from the second quarter reveal that the dairy business has undergone a significant transition. Total milk output in April, May, and June was 57.5 billion pounds, down 0.8% from the previous year. This declining tendency is more than just a statistical footnote; it is an essential signal of overall dairy industry developments. Dairy producers face persistent problems, including variable herd numbers and changing market needs, as seen by their steady fall over three crucial months.

Subtle Shifts in Cow Productivity: Unveiling the Underlying Dynamics

The average milk output per cow in the 24 core dairy-producing states reveals a complex dynamic in the industry. This year’s yield per cow is 2,025 pounds, a noteworthy eight-pound reduction from the prior year. Despite its seeming tiny size, this drop might suggest underlying concerns that need additional research. Feed quality, cow health, and environmental circumstances may significantly influence this decline. Understanding these factors is critical since even modest productivity changes may dramatically impact the dairy industry’s total production and economic stability. This minor but essential shift emphasizes the need for continuous examination and modification in dairy farming operations to maintain long-term production and industry development. Your role in this continuous improvement is crucial.

January to June: Observing Subtle Shifts in Dairy Cow Populations Reflecting Stability Amidst Minor Fluctuations 

From January to June, we saw small changes in the number of cows, indicating a degree of stability despite slight swings. January had an initial total of 8.87 million heads, which increased slightly to 8.88 million by February. This little increase was followed by a modest fall in March and May before reverting to the February record of 8.88 million in June. Such little changes indicate an underlying consistency in the cow population, with the 8.88 million head in June as a focal point for the period’s relative stability.

Regional Powerhouses: Examining California, Wisconsin, and Idaho’s Dominance in Dairy Cow Populations

When we get the details, California stands out for its vast dairy cow herd, which is 1.7 million. This towering monument symbolizes California’s dominance in the dairy sector, establishing a high production efficiency and volume standard. Wisconsin is a close rival, with 1.2 million head, confirming its position as a critical player in dairy production. Meanwhile, Idaho’s 668,000 headcount demonstrates the state’s significant contribution and the judicious dispersion of dairy businesses around the country. These statistics depict the concentrated centers of dairy activity, each contributing distinctively to the overall topography of the United States dairy industry.

Milk Yield Efficiency: A Comparative Hierarchy Among Leading States

Examining cow numbers shows a distinct hierarchy, with California leading the way with an astonishing 1.7 million cattle. This dominating number unabashedly places the state at the pinnacle of the dairy production landscape, highlighting its significant contribution to the industry. Following in its footsteps is Wisconsin, which has 1.2 million cattle. This large amount confirms the state’s position as a critical participant in the dairy business. Despite following behind, Idaho retains a considerable presence with 668 thousand head of cattle, preserving its position among the top dairy-producing states. These numbers, which represent strategic breeding and resource allocation, give a glimpse of the overall dynamics within the key dairy-producing areas of the United States.

The Bottom Line

June’s results show a minor but noticeable decrease in milk output, indicating a continuing trend in the dairy business. Cow production is declining, while cow numbers have changed little. The updated May report and second-quarter analysis confirm this little reduction. In June, 18 billion pounds of milk were produced, an average of 2,025 pounds per cow. The dairy cow population remained stable but fluctuated between January and June. California, Wisconsin, and Idaho have the most cows, but Michigan has the highest per-cow productivity. These findings underscore the importance of your adaptability and proactive steps in maintaining the industry’s viability. Your actions will be critical in shaping the industry’s future.

Key Takeaways:

  • June milk production decreased by eight-tenths of a percent compared to the previous year.
  • The 24 major dairy-producing states produced 18 billion pounds of milk in June.
  • May’s milk production numbers were revised to 18.8 billion pounds, reflecting an eight-tenths percent decrease year-over-year.
  • The total milk production for Q2 (April, May, June) also dropped by eight-tenths of a percent, totaling 57.5 billion pounds.
  • The average milk production per cow in the major states was 2,025 pounds, which is eight pounds less than the previous year.
  • Dairy cow populations have shown slight fluctuations, maintaining an overall stability from January to June.
  • California, Wisconsin, and Idaho lead in the number of dairy cows, with California housing the most at 1.7 million head.
  • Michigan reported the highest milk yield per cow, averaging 2,290 pounds per cow.

Summary:

The USDA’s latest data shows a significant drop in milk production in June, affecting milk pricing, feed costs, and farm profitability. The dairy industry faces persistent problems, including variable herd numbers and changing market needs. The second quarter analysis revealed a significant transition in the dairy industry, with total milk output being 57.5 billion pounds, down 0.8% from the previous year. Cow productivity has also changed, with this year’s yield per cow being 2,025 pounds, an eight-pound reduction from the prior year. From January to June, small changes in the number of cows reflected a degree of stability, with California having a vast dairy cow herd with 1.7 million head, Wisconsin having 1.2 million head, and Idaho having 668,000 head. In conclusion, the dairy industry’s future is influenced by cow production and cow numbers, with actions being critical in shaping its future.

Learn more:

How Dairy-Producing Swing States Could Decide the 2024 Presidential Election

Could dairy-producing swing states like Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Michigan decide the 2024 election? Discover how these key states hold the keys to the White House.

If you are a dairy farmer in America’s heartland, the 2024 presidential election will significantly impact your livelihood. With Joe Biden’s withdrawal, the field has narrowed to Donald Trump and Kamala Harris. This conflict is about more than simply politics; it is about policies influencing agricultural subsidies, trade, and rural development, all of which are essential to the dairy business. Farmers are America’s backbone, and policy choices determine their success or failure. Despite Biden’s departure, crucial states like Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Michigan remain essential. These top dairy-producing areas are critical for achieving an Electoral College win and implementing policies that affect dairy operations, such as milk price and labor restrictions. Dairy producers should be aware and active since the decision will impact their future.

Swing States: The Heartbeat of the U.S. Presidential Election 

Swing states, or battlegrounds where neither major political party has overwhelming power, are essential to the U.S. presidential election. Because the Electoral College is winner-take-all, these states are critical in determining the result. While certain states continuously vote Democratic or Republican, swing states change parties from election to election, making them essential campaign objectives.

Swing states are important because they may tilt the balance of power. As contenders compete for the 270 electoral votes required to win the President, the unpredictable nature of swing states encourages them to devote disproportionate time, money, and resources to gaining an advantage. This electoral calculation implies that wins in these critical places may balance losses in more predictable locations.

Historically, states like Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Michigan have represented the swing state phenomena. Their shifting political allegiances highlight their status as kingmakers in presidential elections. For example, the razor-thin wins and subsequent reversals seen in these states during the 2016 and 2020 elections demonstrate how swing states may shift the whole electoral map.

As a result, the significance of swing states goes beyond simple numbers; they reflect the fluid and changing sands of public opinion that politicians must negotiate. The emphasis on these states highlights the more extensive approach of adapting communications and policies to local issues, highlighting their importance in selecting who occupies the White House.

From Coast to Heartland: The Powerhouses of America’s Dairy Industry

The United States has a diverse and vibrant dairy sector, with numerous states leading the way in milk production. California is the most significant supplier, accounting for most of the nation’s milk supply. California’s agricultural geography supports dairy farms and allied businesses, and the state produces a substantial amount of milk yearly.

Wisconsin, sometimes known as “America’s Dairyland,” is critical to the United States dairy industry. Wisconsin produces a large volume of milk, contributing considerably to the country’s cheese and other dairy products.

While Idaho is not historically known as a dairy powerhouse, the state’s dairy business has expanded rapidly. The state’s good dairy farming circumstances have allowed it to become a significant participant, contributing significantly to the national milk supply.

Texas, renowned for its extensive ranches and agricultural operations, contributes considerably to U.S. milk production. Texas’ dairy business is diversified, with a mix of large-scale commercial farms and traditional family-owned companies serving local and national markets.

New York remains a central dairy-producing state in the heavily populated Northeast. New York’s dairy farms contribute significantly to the national milk supply, highlighting the state’s long-standing legacy.

Michigan leads in dairy production with efficient agricultural procedures and high-yield cows. Michigan’s dairy farms provide:

  • A tremendous output.
  • Ranking #1 nationwide in pounds of milk produced per dairy cow.
  • Making the state an essential player in the national dairy scene.

Breach and Reclaim: The Battleground States of 2016 and 2020 

Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Michigan were in the limelight during the 2016 and 2020 elections because of their significant roles in deciding presidential outcomes. Historically, these states have formed part of the so-called “Blue Wall,” a phrase used to designate states that have consistently voted Democratic in presidential elections. However, the strength of this wall was severely tested and finally broken in 2016, when Donald Trump won all three states by razor-thin margins.

Trump won Pennsylvania by around 44,000 votes, overturning a state that reliably voted for Democratic candidates since 1992. Wisconsin had an even thinner margin, with Trump winning by little over 22,000 votes, the first time the state voted Republican since 1984. Michigan followed a similar trend, with Trump winning by around 10,700 votes, the narrowest margin in the nation that year and a significant shift from its past Democratic leanings.

Let’s fast forward to the 2020 election. These states resurfaced as important battlegrounds, but this time, Biden was successful in recovering them for the Democrats, although by similar thin margins. Biden won Pennsylvania by roughly 80,000 votes, Wisconsin by nearly 20,000, and Michigan by about 154,000. This razor-thin victory highlighted the states’ continued competitiveness and importance on the political map.

The varying voting patterns in Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Michigan throughout these two election cycles demonstrate their volatility and relevance. Their position as members of the Blue Wall is no longer taken for granted, making them significant targets in future Democratic and Republican elections.

As November 5 Approaches, Dairy States Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Michigan Become Electoral Epicenters

As the November 5 election date approaches, the emphasis shifts to the critical dairy-producing battleground states of Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Michigan. According to the most recent surveys and estimates compiled by 270toWin, the race remains very close, with both Trump and Harris vying for supremacy in these critical areas.

Pennsylvania: Trump now leads by a razor-thin 1% edge, indicating a very close contest that might go either way if voter opinion evolves. The state’s substantial dairy business should not be underestimated since it influences rural and urban voters.

Wisconsin: Polls show a similarly acrimonious climate, with Trump leading Harris by 0.5%. This state’s dairy industry, the second-largest in the country, remains a critical political battlefield, with both candidates intensively campaigning to persuade hesitant voters.

Michigan: Unlike Pennsylvania and Wisconsin, Harris leads Trump by 1.2%. Known for its high milk output per cow, Michigan remains a trailblazer despite shifting political preferences and economic ties to the dairy sector.

These forecasts highlight the precarious balance among these states, which jointly hold the keys to the White House. As both major parties ramp up their efforts, the impact of the dairy sector on rural economic policy and environmental concerns cannot be understated. Trump and Harris both appreciate the importance of these sectors, and their campaigns include focused attempts to win over this critical voting category.

Electoral College Dynamics: The Keystone of the Presidential Race 

The Electoral College is at the heart of the United States presidential election system, allocating votes to states based on congressional representation. Each state’s total electoral votes are equal to the number of senators (always two) plus the number of representatives (which varies according to population). A contender must get a majority of these electoral votes, at least 270 out of 538, to win the presidency.

The current consensus projection highlights the precarious balance of power. According to 270toWin, Republicans have 251 electoral votes while Democrats have 226. This leaves a limited margin for both parties to move, with Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Michigan emerging as critical players in the electoral equation. These states, an essential section of the so-called Blue Wall, have traditionally shifted between the two parties and are expected to be hotly fought again in 2024.

Pennsylvania, with its 20 electoral votes, is particularly significant. If Republicans win this state, they will have enough votes to surpass the 270-vote barrier and capture the President. In contrast, if Democrats duplicate their achievement in 2020 by capturing Pennsylvania, Wisconsin (10 votes), and Michigan (16 votes), they will jump ahead, gaining precisely 270 votes. This scenario would leave Republicans fighting for the remaining 17 electoral votes in less predictable states like Nevada and Arizona.

The electoral map, therefore, depicts a closely fought campaign in which the fortunes of Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Michigan will most likely decide the nation’s political destiny. As the campaigns heat up, both parties will surely devote significant resources and strategic attention to these battleground states, knowing their unmatched relevance in determining the result of the 2024 election.

Economic Influence: How Dairy Drives Both Industry and Politics in Crucial Battleground States

The economic impact of the dairy sector in Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Michigan must be considered. These states are major election battlegrounds and dairy powerhouses, with the industry serving as a critical foundation of their local economy. Dairy farms provide billions of dollars in income, support thousands of employment, and contribute to rural towns’ socioeconomic fabric. Dairy farming has a far-reaching impact on related businesses such as feed production, veterinary services, and dairy processing. This economic importance translates into significant political weight; aspirants for the White House cannot afford to ignore it.

Dairy policy is more than a specialized interest for these states’ electorates; it directly influences their lives. As candidates consider maximizing subsidies for small-to-medium-sized dairy producers, balancing land use rules, and tackling significant environmental problems such as methane emissions and water pollution, vote shifts in favor of solid dairy assistance might be crucial. Regulatory policies that offer more support for sustainable farming practices while reducing regulatory burdens on family-scale enterprises may win favor with voters here. As a result, the emphasis on dairy policy may lead to significant differences in voter preferences, underscoring the sector’s position as a predictor of overall election results.

Strategic Gambits: The Electoral Chessboard of Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Michigan

The electoral fates of Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Michigan provide fascinating possibilities for drastically changing the election picture. If the Republicans win all three states, the electoral map will alter substantially. Under this scenario, Trump would secure the requisite electoral votes with a clear advantage, putting all Democratic dreams to rest, even probable victories in other battlegrounds such as Nevada and Arizona. This Republican sweep would demonstrate their ability to overturn previously blue districts.

In contrast, a Democratic sweep of seven key states leads them to 270 electoral votes, securing Kamala Harris’ triumph. This result would be similar to Biden’s victory in 2020, confirming the party’s capacity to reclaim and keep control of the Blue Wall. This scenario would demonstrate the Democrats’ political strategy’s efficacy and connection with voter concerns in these key dairy states.

A split scenario, in which each party claims one or two of these states, might result in a fractious and uncertain election night. For example, suppose Trump wins Pennsylvania, and Harris wins Michigan and Wisconsin. In that case, both candidates’ paths to victory will be shorter, depending primarily on the remaining swing states to tilt the balance. This fractured result would highlight each electoral vote’s razor-thin margins and essential significance.

The Bottom Line

As the political landscape shifts, the impact of key dairy-producing states such as Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Michigan in the race for the White House is apparent. These states might choose the next President of the United States. These dairy states are agricultural powerhouses and critical political battlegrounds, alternating between Republican and Democratic leadership. The recent polls show a fierce contest that can change the Electoral College balance.

Beyond political significance, the decisions here will influence the lives of dairy farmers who face issues such as shifting milk prices and environmental laws. Dairy producers and stakeholders must participate actively in the election process. Advocacy, developing connections with political candidates, and casting educated votes are more important than ever. Your impact goes beyond the farm and into America’s political process. Make your opinion known and help influence the future of both the country and dairy sectors’ future.

Key Takeaways:

  • Joe Biden’s withdrawal hasn’t drastically altered the election landscape, with Trump and Kamala Harris emerging as principal contenders.
  • Dairy states like Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Michigan remain pivotal in determining the electoral outcome, similar to their significance in the 2016 and 2020 elections.
  • These states are categorized under the “Blue Wall,” historically Democratic but hotly contested in recent elections.
  • Current electoral projections indicate a tight race, with the Republican and Democratic parties needing these key states to secure victory.
  • The influence of the dairy industry in these states underscores the importance of political and economic strategies tailored to this sector.
  • Public relations and advocacy efforts by the dairy industry could potentially sway voter sentiment and impact the election results.
  • The economic and regulatory environment shaped by the election outcomes will significantly affect the dairy industry’s future.

Summary:

The 2024 presidential election will significantly impact dairy farmers in the US, with swing states like California, Wisconsin, Idaho, Texas, New York, and Michigan playing crucial roles in the dairy sector. Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Michigan were historically part of the “Blue Wall” and voted Democratic in presidential elections. However, Donald Trump won all three states by razor-thin margins in 2016, and Biden successfully recovered them for Democrats in the 2020 election. The Electoral College, which allocates votes to states based on congressional representation, is at the heart of the U.S. presidential election system. Dairy policy directly influences the lives of these states’ electorates, making the 2024 election a pivotal moment for the dairy industry.

Learn more:

From Family Farm to Industry Leader: The Journey of Larson Acres, 2024 World Dairy Expo Dairy Producers of the Year

Discover the inspiring journey of Larson Acres, World Dairy Expo’s 2024 Dairy Producers of the Year. How do they efficiently manage 2,500 cows and 5,000 acres?

Managing a 2,500-cow herd and 5,000 acres, Larson Acres has earned the  2024 World Dairy Expo Dairy Producers of the Year title. Meet Ed and Barb Larson, daughter Sandy, brother Mike, and Jim, Trustee from Evansville, Wisconsin, who set new standards in the dairy industry. Their story spans from modest beginnings to becoming a leading dairy operation, as shared in a recent World Dairy Expo’s Podcast – The Dairy Show The Larson Acres Team. Discover their breeding and genetics excellence, community integration, and innovative employee management—a must-read for dairy farmers aiming to thrive in today’s evolving landscape. Larson Acres showcases how tradition, innovation, and community drive success in dairy farming.

The Evolution from Humble Beginnings to Dairy Pioneers 

However, this journey was not without its challenges. The farm faced economic downturns, changing market conditions, and the need to adapt to new technologies and regulations. Yet, the Larsons persevered, using these challenges as opportunities for growth and innovation. Their story is a testament to the resilience and adaptability required in the dairy industry. 

The official starting point for Larson Acres, as incorporated in 1971, marked a significant leap in its transformation. However, Ed Larson’s father established the home farm in 1957, milking about 65 cows in a modest 57-stanchion barn and managing around 500 acres. This foundational setup was only the beginning of a series of pivotal developments. 

One of the first significant expansions occurred in 1985, with the construction of a 155-stall tie-stall barn, a move intended to enhance cow care and streamline operations. This laid the groundwork for the farm’s first transition to a more modern setup. By 1998, the Larson family expanded by introducing their first milking parlor and free-stall barn, scaling their operations from 600 to 1,200 cows. 

The 2010s were transformative years for Larson Acres, demonstrating their ambitious vision and commitment to growth. By 2010, the farm doubled its herd to approximately 2,500 milking cows, and the crop production expanded to 5,500 acres. The Larsons steadily integrated advanced techniques and technology throughout these expansions to enhance productivity and cow welfare

Community involvement has been a key pillar of Larson Acres’ success. The farm actively participates in local events, hosts educational tours, and supports community initiatives. This not only fosters a positive relationship with the community but also helps in promoting the dairy industry and sustainable farming practices. Larson Acres’ success is not just a result of their hard work and dedication, but also the support and collaboration of the community.

The Pillars Behind Larson Acres’ Triumph

The Larson family has been pivotal in steering Larson Acres towards its current success, with each member bringing unique skills and dedication. 

Ed and Barb Larson: As the founders, Ed and Barb Larson have been the cornerstone of Larson Acres. Ed’s strategic vision and relentless work ethic, coupled with Barb’s significant contributions, have been instrumental in expanding from a modest beginning to a large-scale operation. Their foresight and planning are a source of inspiration for those in the industry. 

Sandy Larson: The eldest child, Sandy, has climbed the ranks to become the CEO of Larson Acres. Her deep love for cows and meticulous attention to herd health and management have been central to the farm’s high-performance levels. Sandy’s successful implementation of structured employee engagement programs not only maintains a meager turnover rate and high employee morale but also underscores the Larsons’ dedication to their team’s well-being. 

Jamie Larson: Jamie, the middle child, has been integral in the technical and mechanical aspects of the farm operations. As the former shop manager, his expertise ensured the smooth functioning of the farm’s machinery and infrastructure. Although he has taken a step back from daily operations, his contributions have impacted the farm’s efficiency and maintenance practices. 

Mark Larson: The youngest, Mark, although not as involved in day-to-day operations, has maintained a close connection with the farm. His architectural skills, honed outside the farm, have influenced various structural and developmental projects at Larson Acres. Mark’s pride in the family heritage brings external visibility to the farm, as he frequently hosts tours and showcases the farm’s operations to visitors. 

Mike Larson: As the Dairy Manager, Mike focuses on the genetic and nutritional aspects of the operation. His work on the genetics and embryo programs has elevated the quality of the herd, leading to successful cattle exports internationally. Mike’s expertise in milk and feed pricing risk management further ensures the financial stability and growth of Larson Acres. 

Jim Trustum: Serving as the Herd Manager, Jim is the linchpin in the daily management of the cows. His hands-on approach and innovative cow comfort and health strategies have significantly contributed to the herd’s high-performance metrics. His use of modern management tools like Dairy Comp and Cal Manager showcases the farm’s forward-thinking approach to maintaining elite herd health standards. 

Together, these individuals form a cohesive team that epitomizes the strength of family-run businesses. Their combined efforts and diverse skill sets have propelled Larson Acres to be a leading name in the dairy industry.

Mike Larson: The Visionary Behind Larson Acres’ Genetic Excellence 

Diving into the intricate realm of genetics and breeding, Mike Larson is a pivotal figure at Larson Acres. His deep-seated passion for understanding and improving herd genetics has driven the farm’s breeding initiatives to new heights. Mike’s role encompasses the meticulous management of the genetics and embryo program and the critical task of managing milk and feed pricing risk. This multifaceted responsibility ensures not just the health and productivity of the cows but also the farm’s economic resilience. 

Mike’s expertise is most evident in the farm’s sophisticated breeding philosophy. Emphasizing balanced, deep-bodied animals with robust wellness traits, he selects genetic traits that promise longevity and health, steering away from a purely production-focused approach. This philosophy aligns with sustainable farming practices and underscores a commitment to animal welfare, ensuring cows reach their full potential in both productivity and well-being. 

The markets for Larson Acres’ genetics extend far beyond domestic boundaries. The farm’s genetic materials and embryos are highly sought after, with a significant foothold in China and a notable presence in Japan and Germany. This international demand speaks volumes about the quality and reputation of their breeding stock. Furthermore, by participating in renowned national sales and offering some of their best animals and IVF sessions, Larson Acres showcases their willingness to share their top-tier genetics with the global farming community. 

A cornerstone of Mike’s genetic program is the on-farm IVF lab, established around three years ago. This lab, a testament to the farm’s forward-thinking approach, facilitates the weekly production of embryos, ensuring consistency and quality. The partnership with Sunshine Genetics enhances this setup, allowing neighboring dairy farmers to lease the facility. This collaborative effort bolsters the local farming community and cements Larson Acres as a hub of genetic excellence. 

Therefore, Mike’s role is about more than just managing genetic programs and risk strategies. It is about envisioning and steering the future of dairy farming, where genetics, technology, and sustainability converge to create a blueprint for success. Through his efforts, Larson Acres continues to lead in breeding innovations, setting benchmarks in the dairy industry worldwide.

Jim Trustum: The Custodian of Cow Welfare and Productivity at Larson Acres 

Jim Trustum, as herd manager at Larson Acres, pivotally oversees the day-to-day decisions related to cow welfare and productivity. The farm boasts two separate milking barns: a conventional, naturally ventilated barn housing 1,300 cows and a cross-ventilated facility accommodating roughly 1,200 cows. Trustum’s responsibilities include ensuring that these facilities operate efficiently and effectively, contributing to the farm’s high level of productivity. 

Innovations in cow comfort are a cornerstone of Larson Acres’ approach to herd management. Using recycled sand for bedding provides a comfortable and sanitary environment for the cows. At the same time, the cross-ventilated barn helps maintain a consistent and favorable climate throughout the year. The rubber flooring installation has recently enhanced hoof health, a testament to the farm’s proactive stance on animal welfare. 

Technology is crucial to the farm’s success, with indispensable tools like Dairy Comp and Cal Manager. Dairy Comp assists in maintaining detailed records and making informed management decisions. At the same time, Cal Manager, with its heat and health alerts, allows for early intervention in potential health issues, ensuring the cows receive timely care. 

Larson Acres’ herd statistics reflect their commitment to quality and excellence. The farm consistently achieves an average of 112 pounds of energy-corrected milk per cow daily, with a combined fat and protein percentage exceeding 7.5%. Additionally, their somatic cell count remains impressively low, at approximately 70,000, underscoring the herd’s overall health and high performance. This level of achievement is a collective effort, reliant on a dedicated team and meticulous management practices.

A Legacy of Community Engagement and Support 

Larson Acres’ genuine commitment to community engagement is evident through their extensive involvement in the local fabric of Evansville and Rock County. Recognizing the importance of nurturing their home base, the farm has consistently made meaningful contributions to various community projects and events. Whether it’s funding for the Creekside community center, supporting the Evansville library’s expansion, or aiding in creating a new park on former farmland, Larson Acres ensures their legacy extends beyond dairy farming. 

Beyond financial contributions, the Larson family actively participates in local events and dairy promotion activities. They are staunch supporters of the Rock County fair, assisting young 4-H members preparing to showcase their cattle. Their commitment to dairy education is further manifested in hosting numerous farm tours, providing the public with insights into modern dairy farming practices and the essential role of agriculture in their lives. 

Their community engagement doesn’t stop at large-scale projects; it permeates everyday interactions within the local area. From sponsoring small contests like guessing the number of seeds in a pumpkin to organizing educational opportunities for residents, Larson Acres goes the extra mile to foster a sense of belonging and mutual support. This unwavering dedication to their community underscores the farm’s philosophy: quality, pride, and family are the pillars of their farming success and commitment to Evansville and Rock County.

Sandy Larson: Architect of Employee Well-Being and Operational Excellence at Larson Acres

At Larson Acres, Sandy Larson has demonstrated exceptional leadership and ingenuity in managing employee relations. With an authoritative yet compassionate approach, she has cultivated a work environment with high morale and remarkably low turnover, achieving a turnover rate of less than 1%. Sandy attributes this success to robust employee engagement activities, ample growth opportunities, and meticulously defined roles and Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs). 

Engagement is central to Sandy’s HR strategy. She ensures regular employee interaction, organizing monthly activities such as luncheons, educational opportunities, and fun contests, like guessing the number of seeds in a pumpkin during Halloween. These activities foster community and belonging among the staff, making them feel valued and appreciated. 

Furthermore, Sandy prioritizes growth opportunities for her employees. Many team members have advanced to management positions under her guidance, showcasing the farm’s commitment to professional development. This culture of internal promotion not only boosts morale but also encourages long-term loyalty and dedication, as employees see a clear path for their career progression within the farm. 

Equally important are the clear role definitions and SOPs that Sandy has helped establish. Each position at Larson Acres comes with a detailed set of procedures and expectations, ensuring that employees are well-equipped to perform their duties effectively. Regular check-ins at one month and six months help to reinforce these standards, ensuring that new hires are well-integrated and confident in their roles. 

This structured approach to onboarding and role clarity is complemented by frequent communication and monthly meetings, where staff can discuss ongoing projects and share insights. Sandy has created a resilient and responsive organizational structure that consistently delivers high performance and employee satisfaction by empowering middle managers with the tools and authority to lead their respective teams.

Ed Larson’s Dedication to Preserving Dairy Heritage Through His Milk Bottle Collection

Ed Larson’s passion for historical preservation finds a tangible expression in his extensive milk bottle collection, meticulously curated and showcased within Larson Acres’ museum. Housing approximately 1600 Wisconsin milk bottles, this collection is a testament to the region’s rich dairy heritage. Each bottle, organized alphabetically by Creamery, encapsulates a piece of the local dairies’ history, offering visitors a nostalgic journey through time. 

The museum goes beyond milk bottles to include an array of farmer-related artifacts, soda fountain shop memorabilia, and antique agricultural equipment. Noteworthy is a diminutive stanchion from Black Earth, an evocative reminder of the craftsmanship and businesses that once defined the dairy industry. These relics, painstakingly gathered from auctions and online sources, serve as educational touchstones illuminating past dairy practices and technologies. 

Significant events, such as the Evansville Historical Society’s recent fundraiser on the museum premises, underscore the community’s recognition of this heritage site. These gatherings highlight the extensive collection and foster a communal appreciation for dairy farming’s legacy. Ed’s guided tours, often featuring interactive discussions about the museum’s artifacts, engage visitors and enrich their understanding of the historical dairy landscape. 

Preserving this history is crucial for future generations, ensuring they can appreciate the evolution of dairy farming and the intertwined local businesses. The museum serves as an educational platform, inspiring young farmers and community members to value their roots while innovating for the future. Through this blend of nostalgia and education, Larson Acres’ museum makes a compelling case for the importance of historical preservation in fostering community identity and continuity.

The Larson Acres Team: Blending Tradition with Progressive Vision for a Promising Future 

The Larson Acres team, deeply rooted in tradition yet progressive in their approach, is setting the stage for a promising future, charting a course that involves the next generation. The farm’s leadership, exemplified by Ed, Barb, Sandy, Mike, and Jim, is committed to passing on the legacy to the younger Larsons while ensuring the operation remains at the cutting edge of dairy farming. 

Sandy Larson articulates the farm’s long-term vision well. “We are setting up for the next generation,” she says, highlighting the involvement of her children Brooke, Dane, and Luke in various farm operations. With her passion for animal care, Brooke is gaining valuable experience off-farm and is expected to return, contributing to calf rearing and herd management. Dane has already embedded himself in the farm’s daily operations, working with crops and maintenance. He is integral to expanding infrastructure like commodity sheds and drying setups. Luke, a recent graduate from UW-Platteville, is honing his risk management and financial strategy skills at EverAg, positioning himself to bring these valuable insights back to Larson Acres potentially. 

The farm’s goals are to sustain growth and innovation. This includes adopting new technologies to enhance productivity and cow welfare, such as advanced genetics and feeding programs spearheaded by Mike Larson. Additionally, they are focusing on implementing modern management tools and infrastructure improvements, from rubber flooring to advanced lighting systems in cow barns. These efforts aim to achieve higher efficiency, better animal health, and superior milk production metrics. 

Larson Acres’ aspirations extend beyond farm efficiency. Community engagement and employee well-being remain paramount. With an incredibly low employee turnover and a structure fostering personal growth and job satisfaction, Sandy continues to drive initiatives that keep the workforce motivated and committed. This family-run farm understands its future success hinges on technological and operational advancements and nurturing a vibrant, skilled, and dedicated team. 

As they prepare for continued success, the Larsons remain committed to their core values of quality, pride, and family. These principles guide their decisions and inspire the younger generation to take on more significant roles, ensuring the farm remains a leader in the dairy industry. The meticulous planning and focused goals manifest their unwavering dedication to honoring their heritage and embracing the future. The result is a robust, forward-thinking operation poised to uphold its legacy while scaling new heights in dairy excellence.

The Bottom Line

The Larson Acres team, led by Ed and Barb Larson, Mike Larson, Sandy Larson, and Jim Trustee, has earned the title of World Dairy Expo’s 2024 Dairy Producers of the Year. Managing 2,500 milking cows and 5,000 acres, their success stems from innovative breeding programs and community involvement. Mike focuses on genetics, featuring the Ferrari and Miss America cow families, while Jim ensures cow welfare. Sandy maintains a stellar workplace with minimal turnover. Beyond the farm, they support Evansville’s community and participate in dairy promotions. Embracing advanced tech and honoring heritage, Ed’s milk bottle collection is a tribute to their legacy. Visit Larson Acres or see them at the World Dairy Expo to witness their dedication and innovation in modern dairy farming.

To learn more, check out World Dairy Expo’s Podcast – The Dairy Show The Larson Acres Team.

Key Takeaways:

  • Strategic Growth: From humble beginnings in 1971, Larson Acres expanded to manage a 2,500-cow milking herd and 5,000 acres, showcasing strategic and measured growth.
  • Family Involvement: The farm thrives on robust family involvement, with each member contributing uniquely to its success, from genetics to operations and beyond.
  • Innovative Genetics Program: Mike Larson’s focus on balanced, health-oriented animals has led to successful breeding programs and a prominent presence in international markets.
  • Cow Comfort and Health: Commitment to cow welfare is evident through advanced facilities and practices, such as recycled sand bedding, cross-ventilated barns, and rubber flooring.
  • Employee Engagement: Sandy Larson has fostered a positive work environment with employee engagement activities, resulting in a turnover rate of less than 1% and a waiting list for employment.
  • Community Support: The Larsons actively contribute to their local community, supporting various initiatives and fostering a strong public presence.
  • Historic Preservation: Ed Larson’s extensive collection of Wisconsin milk bottles and dairy artifacts offers a nostalgic glimpse into the industry’s past.


Summary:

Larson Acres, a dairy farm in Evansville, Wisconsin, has been named the 2024 World Dairy Expo Dairy Producers of the Year. The Larson family, including Ed and Barb Larson, daughter Sandy, brother Mike, and Jim Trustee, have played a significant role in the farm’s growth and success. The farm began in 1971 with 65 cows in a small barn, managing 500 acres. Over time, the family expanded their operations, introducing their first milking parlor and free-stall barn in 1985. By 2010, the farm had doubled its herd to 2,500 milking cows and crop production to 5,500 acres. The Larsons integrated advanced techniques and technology to enhance productivity and cow welfare. Community involvement is a key pillar of Larson Acres’ success, with the farm actively participating in local events, hosting educational tours, and supporting community initiatives. The farm’s breeding philosophy emphasizes balanced, deep-bodied animals with robust wellness traits, aligning with sustainable farming practices. Jim Trustum, the herd manager, oversees cow welfare and productivity decisions. Technology, such as Dairy Comp and Cal Manager, aids in managing records and decision-making.

Learn more:

National Brown Swiss Convention 2024: Highlights, Awards, and Key Events in Green Bay, Wisconsin

Uncover the pinnacle moments from the 2024 National Brown Swiss Convention in Green Bay. Which participants triumphed in the coveted awards? Delve into essential events and victors through our comprehensive analysis.

The National Brown Swiss Convention—hosted by the Wisconsin Brown Swiss Association in Green Bay, Wisconsin—is a premier event for the Brown Swiss community. Set between July 3rd and July 6th, the conference draws approximately 200 people, underscoring its significance in the dairy sector. It provides an essential forum for celebrating Brown Swiss successes, networking, and exchanging innovations. “The National Brown Swiss Convention is more than just a conference—it’s a celebration of excellence and invention in dairy farming,” said a senior organization member. Capturing the commitment and advancement of the Brown Swiss community, the event consists of Board of Directors meetings, youth contest interviews, significant prizes, and a grand auction. The Hyatt Regency Green Bay is the perfect site, combining history with modern ideas and festivities.

Inaugural Day of the National Brown Swiss Convention: A Symphony of Meetings, Youth Engagement, and Cultural Exploration 

Attendees of the National Brown Swiss Convention convened at the Hyatt Regency Green Bay on the first day. Their starting point for the day was critical Board of Directors meetings, determining the course of events. Young contestants also undertook contest interviews to highlight their expertise and love of the Brown Swiss breed. New Generation Genetics sponsored a welcome meal at Stadium View Bar and Grill tonight. This conference gave participants a great chance to network and deepen ties within their community. Following dinner, attendees visited Lambeau Field and the Titletown District, fully engaging in Green Bay’s rich sports legacy and energetic local culture.

Awards and Milestones: Celebrating Achievements on Day Two of the National Brown Swiss Convention 

The second day of the National Brown Swiss Convention began with a robust breakfast, setting a spirited tone for the day’s events. Afterward, attendees convened for the anticipated awards ceremony, honoring exceptional contributions within the Brown Swiss community. Among the awards, the 2023 Living Lifetime Cow Award stood out, awarded to Jenlar Dynasty Treat, owned by Larry and Jennifer Meyer of Chilton, Wisconsin, for a lifetime ECM of 433,802. 

The prestigious J.P. Eves Trophy was bestowed upon Hilltop Acres Lucky Denim from Tanner Mashek of Calmar, Iowa, exhibiting impressive figures of 4-09 305d 3x 53,150m 4.9% 2,608f 3.0% 1,588p. Denim also won the Protein Award. Additionally, the H.R. Searles Trophy was awarded to Nor-Bert Carter Lexus ETV from Dalton, Dillon, and Breanne Freemen of Bremen, Indiana, with a record of 4-02 305d 3x 39,690m 7.0% 2,779f 3.7% 1,478. 

The Vernon C. Hull Total Performance Award went to Dutch-Marie Dundee Allie, owned by Hadleigh, Ezra, Kenna Jones, and Kelly Jo Manion of Edmonton, Kentucky. Allie achieved a point total of 288 with a production record of 4-04 305d 2x 39,150m 4.1% 1,603f 3.5% 1,351p. Allie received the Cow for All Seasons Award with an ECM of 43,896m and was the Type and Production winner at the International Brown Swiss Show. 

The 2024 Annual Meeting commenced after the awards, marking a significant juncture for the association. Noteworthy elections included Brian Pacheco from Kerman, California, as President and Director of District IX; Dayne Voelker from Perryville, Missouri, as Vice-President and Director of District VI; Sheri Smith from Ohio as Director of District III; and Brent Moyer from Caro, Michigan, as Director of District IV.

Day Three Highlights: Meadow Brook Farms Tour Showcases Excellence in Dairy Farming

They started the third day with a hurried breakfast before guests got on busses headed for Meadow Brook Dairy Farms LLC in Manitowoc, Wisconsin. Under Mitch and McKenzie Kappelman’s direction, along with Mitch’s parents, Pete and Shellie, this fifth-generation farm milks 380 registered brown Swiss cows and 380 holsteins. The average milk weight of the Brown Swiss herd is 27,389 lbs.; its fat content is 4.27% 1169 lbs.; and its protein content is 3.29% 901 lbs. Mitch deserves the 2020 National Distinguished Young Brown Swiss Breeder title. With 27 polled Brown Swiss females in the herd, Meadow Brook presently shows an apparent concentration on breeding polled cattle and has supplied 16 bulls to A.I., including top bulls SEGA and STANDOUT.

Grand Finale: Swissconsin National Convention Sale Caps Off the 2024 National Brown Swiss Convention 

On the last day of the National Brown Swiss Convention, we presented the much-anticipated Swissconsin National Convention Sale at the Brown County Fairgrounds in De Pere, Wisconsin. This auction brought buyers, breeders, and fans to compete for some of the best Brown Swiss cattle.

Experienced and charismatic auctioneer, Adam Fraley from Pennsylvania, handled the events expertly. The Brown Swiss Association’s Executive Secretary, Norm Magnussen, kindly helped him by providing thorough pedigree details that greatly enhanced the bidding process.

The sales embodied the creativity, commitment, and community spirit that typified the conference. While buyers sought premium genes to improve their herds, sellers highlighted their breeding successes.

The 2024 National Brown Swiss Convention was successful with the last gavel strike. Participating in a comprehensive program of educational, commercial, and social events, over 200 people highlighted the strength and cohesiveness of the Brown Swiss community. They underlined the relevance of the breed in the dairy sector.

The Bottom Line

The National Brown Swiss Convention in Green Bay, Wisconsin, embodied innovation and legacy within the dairy farming sector. Participants were in exciting meetings, youth events, awards ceremonies, and a major national sale over four days, from the Hyatt Regency Green Bay to the Meadow Brook Farms tour, and the last event at the Brown County Fairgrounds honored Brown Swiss breed successes. Key events were Jenlar Dynasty Treat’s 2023 Living Lifetime Cow Award victory and the Board of Directors election of leaders like Brian Pacheco and Dayne Voelker. Aiming for development and leadership in dairy farming, the event matched history with modernism. The convention held in 2024 was evidence of the togetherness and forward-looking attitude of the community, therefore motivating further innovation and quality for the Brown Swiss breed’s future.

Key Takeaways:

  • Strong Attendance: Over 200 attendees registered, indicating robust interest and participation.
  • Engagement and Activities: Initiated with Board of Directors meetings and Youth contest interviews.
  • Welcome Dinner: Hosted at Stadium View Bar and Grill, sponsored by New Generation Genetics.
  • Cultural Tours: Optional visits to Lambeau Field and the Titletown District post-dinner provided enriching experiences.

Summary:

The National Brown Swiss Convention, hosted by the Wisconsin Brown Swiss Association in Green Bay, Wisconsin, is in full swing with a dynamic blend of events and activities. Attracting over 200 attendees, the convention kicked off on July 3rd and will run until July 6th. The opening day featured Board of Directors meetings and Youth contest interviews, culminating in a welcome dinner sponsored by New Generation Genetics and optional tours of Lambeau Field and the Titletown District. Subsequent days were marked by award presentations, including the prestigious Living Lifetime Cow Award and J.P Eves Trophy, along with significant business meetings and an informative tour of Meadow Brook Farms. The final day will be highlighted by the Swissconsin National Convention Sale, promising an engaging conclusion to this noteworthy event.

Learn more:

The Untold Story of K-Kuipercrest Inspir Ardath: The Greatest Holstein That Never Was

Uncover the unknown tale of K-Kuipercrest Inspir Ardath, the Holstein cow that amazed the dairy world but never achieved her full potential. Want to find out why?

Once upon a time, there was a Holstein cow named K-Kuipercrest Inspir Ardath. Lawyer and esteemed dairy cattle historian Ed Morwick nearly acquired a half-interest in her. While he ultimately did not secure that half-interest—something that, in hindsight, was fortuitous—it turned out to be quite the setback for David Brown.

First, Let’s Introduce our Two Protagonists.

David Brown, like all of us, had his flaws. Endowed with remarkable skills as a breeder, showman, and promoter, he was often hailed as the finest cattleman of his era. Growing up on Browndale Farms in Paris, Ontario, he had towering expectations to meet. His father, R.F. Brown, was a luminary in the dairy world, winning the esteemed Curtis Clark Achievement Award in 1988 and the Klussendorf Trophy at the 1993 World Dairy Expo. As one of Canada’s most successful breeders, R.F. clinched Premier Breeder and Exhibitor honors at the World Dairy Expo and the Royal Winter Fair. His accolades included five Grand Champions at the Royal Winter Fair: Green Elms Echo Christina (1972 and dam of Browndale Commissioner), Vanlea Nugget Joyce (1974), Marfield Marquis Molly (1978), and Du-Ma-Ti Valiant Boots Jewel (1988). David certainly had big shoes to fill.  And fill them he did. His list of accomplishments was extensive: He led Ontario’s top herd in production in 1991, bred two All-Canadian Breeder’s Herd groups, and produced the All-American Best Three Females in 1998. He was twice crowned Premier Breeder at the International Holstein Show and accumulated 92 awards in All-Canadian and All-American contests from 1986 through 2004. Yet, despite two auction sales in 1991 and 1996 aimed at reducing his debts, financial relief was elusive. Over time, his wife left him, his children moved away, and his prized cattle were sold off. Eventually, David relocated to Colombia, where he passed away. Views on Brown are mixed—some saw him as a charming inspiration, while others regarded him as a rule-bending showman or an irresponsible debtor. Nonetheless, his rapid ascent and remarkable achievements in his lifetime are indisputable. Many wealthy individuals have invested vast sums of money into the cattle industry, chasing the same recognition, only to leave empty-handed. What distinguished David Brown was his nearly mystical talent for preparing animals for the show ring and transforming them into champions.

Edward Young Morwick, a distinguished author, cattle breeder, and lawyer, was born in 1945 on the Holstein dairy farm owned by his father, Hugh G. Morwick. His early memories of his mother carrying him through the cow aisles profoundly shaped his trajectory. Although Edward pursued a career in law, excelling immediately by finishing second out of 306 in his first year, he harbored a deep-seated passion for journalism. This led to his later work chronicling Holstein’s cow history. His seminal work, “The Chosen Breed and The Holstein History,” stands as a cornerstone for those delving into the evolution of the North American Holstein breed. In it, he compellingly argues that the most influential bulls were those of the early historical period. (Read more: Edward Young Morwick – Country Roads to Law Office)

The Story of K-Kuipercrest Inspir Ardath 

Arthur Kuiper meticulously built his herd around the cornerstone cow, Stone-Front Prestige Angie, at his Waupun, Wisconsin farm. Angie was a direct descendant of Prestige of Lakehurst, who himself hailed from the legendary Romandale Reflection Marquis, bred by Agro Bros. in Hamilton, Ontario. For those familiar with dairy cattle lineage, Marquis was an icon, undefeated in the aged bull class from 1967 onwards—the year he catapulted onto the premier show circuit. He earned the prestigious title of All-American aged bull not once but twice.

Stone-Front Prestige Angie produced an exceptional Paclamar Astronaut daughter named Stone-Front Astronaut Angela, who was in the dam when arriving at Kuipercrest Farm. Angela achieved an Excellent rating and recorded an impressive output of over 25,000 lbs. of milk. She then gave birth to Kuipercrest Warden Ardela, a Hilltopper Warden daughter. Ardela also achieved an Excellent rating, her pedigree further enhanced by a double cross of Astronaut genetics, tracing back through Warden’s mother.

In the late 1970s, Kuiper decided to sell off his herd. However, his emotional ties to a few members of the Angie family made him hold onto them. Faced with the challenge of finding a place for these cherished animals, he struck a deal with Theron Keller, a promising young farmer from Richland Center, Wisconsin. In exchange for Keller’s commitment to their care, Kuiper offered him partial ownership of some of these prized cattle.

In 1987, Kuipercrest Warden Ardela gave birth to a daughter named K-Kuipercrest Inspir Ardath. The “K-Kuipercrest” prefix honored both Keller and Kuiper, while “Inspir” highlighted her sire, Hanover-Hill Inspiration. Ardath’s early years were typical for a calf, marked by average growth and development. In fact, she flourished much more than the KuiperKeller partnership itself. Primarily a cash crop farmer managing extensive land, Keller wasn’t providing the cattle with the meticulous care Kuiper believed they deserved.

Brown’s Return to Our Story

In March 1993, David Brown made an incidental stop at the Fond du Lac sale barn during a visit to Wisconsin. Positioned in the front row was the enormous K-Kuipercrest Inspir Ardath. Despite her fleshy and ample appearance, Brown’s expert eye was immediately drawn to her front legs, particularly the femur— the skeleton’s longest bone, which connects the knee to the upper body. Even though Ardath was as rotund as a bear preparing for winter, Brown was confident she could be transformed into something extraordinary. The length, shape, and contour of her femur bone unequivocally promised it.

After leaving what was the winning bid with the sales manager, Brown returned to his Cher-Own Farm in Paris, Ontario. Before long, K-Kuipercrest Inspir Ardath had made her way to his barn. You would have encountered her if you stepped through Brown’s milkhouse door in June 1993. She stood in the second box stall, her chin perched on the top rail, with her hindquarters seemingly touching the pen’s eastern wall. Her stature was so impressive and her presence so commanding that one’s initial impression felt almost like an illusion.

Despite being before cell phones and the internet, word of a “special” cow would spread like wildfire through the “dairy industry”. Visitors came in torrents. Mexican and South American buyers on the back roads buying cattle asked their Canadian agents for side trips to the CherOwn farmstead to see K-Kuipercrest Inspir Ardath. They came; they stared in amazement. The cow looked great alongside two Royal Winter Fair Grand Champions, Du-Ma-Ti Valiant Boots Jewel and Merkley Starbuck Whitney, who occupied adjoining box stalls.

When Ken Empey first laid eyes on Ardath, he was struck with awe. He left the stable, sat in his car for a moment, and then felt compelled to return to the barn. He stood there, staring at her for another ten minutes. Finally, he went back to his car and drove off. In Empey’s estimation, K-Kuipercrest Inspir Ardath was superior to Brookview Tony Charity in every conceivable way.

Public interest surged and offers rolled in. Yet, Brown deemed them frivolous, most hovering around $100,000. He stood firm, unwavering in his quarter-million-dollar valuation.

Morwick’s Return to Our Story

To Morwick, the cow seemed undervalued. He speculated that she could potentially rival the legendary Glenridge Citation Roxy or even Snow-N Denises Dellia. From his perspective, investing in her was a far superior choice compared to acquiring a descendant from the Roxy or Lulu families, despite their high demand at the time. Roxys and Lulus were abundant, with hundreds on the market.

Standing there in all her glory: an outstanding bovine specimen with three generations of Excellent-rated dams; her lineage included a twice All-American great-granddam, and she descended from the top sires of their respective eras. Indeed, it is a remarkable pedigree.

”Yes,” said David Brown, “I value this cow at a quarter-million dollars, and I’ll take $125,000.00 for a half interest.

There’s lots of money left in her, even at that price.”

“Surely not for Morwick,” Morwick said. ”You wouldn’t charge him that much, would you?”

“Sure would,” said Brown.

The Enigma

Morwick was taken aback by Brown’s lack of leniency, especially considering the hefty legal bills. Brown had accumulated $25,000 in fees with Morwick’s law office, including costs from suing Holstein Canada over disciplinary actions for supposed ethical breaches at the Royal.

One day when Morwick asked Brown when he might pay, he got choked up and teary. “Surely you can pay something,” Morwick said.

“These bills represent a lot of work.” In the end, he gave Morwick a cheque for $5,000.00. I told him he could forget the rest.

Morwick decided to absorb the loss.

If David couldn’t pay Morwick for quality work faithfully performed, he asked himself, then how did he come up with the $5,000.00 he paid for K-Kuipercrest Inspir Ardath?

This was the enigma.

Morwick felt that “All these show guys are the same. Big shots with not a pot to let go in, they can always come up with enough money to buy a good cow. In these guys, ego always gets ahead of responsibility.”  Morwick felt this way as he had worked with Holstein promoters for twenty-five years.

Thus, despite Morwick’s earlier gift of $20,000.00 to Brown, the latter now expected Morwick to pay the full price for a half share in his prized cow.

Morwick figured an offer in writing might tempt him. He drew up a contract: “Offer to Purchase re: K-Kuipercrest Inspir Ardath,” the document was titled. The parties to the contract were David John Brown (hereinafter “Vendor”) and Edward Young Marwick (hereinafter “Purchaser”).

There were the usual paragraphs, all with appropriate titles. Paragraph 3 said, “The Purchaser hereby purchases, and Vendor hereby sells, for the sum of sixty-five thousand dollars, a one-half interest in K-Kuipercrest Inspir Ardath.  

It said the purchase price will be paid in cash upon closing this transaction.”

Paragraph 4 states, “Purchaser acknowledges that he, his veterinarians, or other persons on his behalf have personally inspected Ardath and are satisfied that she is in sound condition and free from disease or defect.”

The heartbreaker was paragraph 5: “The parties agree to obtain and maintain mortality insurance and insurance against all the usual perils in an amount equal to at least $130,000.00.”

Morwick’s secretary prepared the Offer with blue document covers and red seals for the signatures of both the Vendor and the Purchaser. I placed four copies into an envelope and delivered them to Brown. He extracted one and placed it deliberately atop the milk cooler.

He read the Offer. Very slowly. He came to the dollar amount. “Nope,” he said, “not enough money.” He picked up all four offers, placed them together, shook them up and down, and hit their bottoms on top of the cooler so they were all together in a tight little stack. Then he handed them back. “Give me a hundred and a quarter for a half-interest,” he said. “There’s plenty of money left for both of us.”

The next day, walking up John Street, Morwick passed a coffee shop they called the Donay Cafe. There was a For Sale sign in the window. I called the broker. “It’s listed at $199,000.00,” he told me. “Wanna look at it? It’s a power of sale. It’s going cheap.”

“Sure,” Morwick said. ”I’ll meet you there in an hour.”

Morwick redirected the $135,000 originally set aside for the half-interest in K-Kuipercrest Inspir Ardath and invested it in purchasing a building. Subsequently, he relocated his law practice to the ground floor of this new property.

Ardath Goes Head to Head with Legends

In November 1993, Brown exhibited Ardath at the Royal Winter Fair. When she entered the five-year-old class, she was bone dry; Brown had her on a strict diet to refine her form. Despite her condition, Ardath secured a commendable second place, trailing behind Merkley Starbuck Whitney, who was on her path to the reserve grand championship. Whitney, showcased by Brown for her Japanese owners, was in prime condition, with her udder at its peak. The seasoned judges at ringside could not help but remark, “The second cow’s the better one,” with her longer head, broader muzzle, and more correct front legs.

Later in the year, Whitney claimed the title of All-Canadian five-year-old, with Ardath securing the Reserve position. “Just wait until next year,” Brown declared.

The Unfortunate Ending

A month later, Morwick visited Brown’s farm. Ardath was conspicuously absent from the second box stall. “Where is she?” Morwick inquired.

“She’s dead,” said David. “She developed a lung adhesion.”

Part of her lung adhered to her rib cage. It proved fatal.”

“Too bad,” Morwick said.

Brown’s smile turned rueful as he clutched the top rail of the pen with both hands, his gaze dropping to the ground.

“I should have taken your offer,” he said.

“Why?” Mowrik replied.

“Then she would have been insured,” responded Brown.

“She wouldn’t have passed the vet check,” Morwick said. “The vet would have seen the adhesion.”

“No, She would have. Draper would have passed her.”

“That’s the cattle business,” Morwick said.

The Bottom Line

In the competitive world of dairy cattle showing, the story of K-Kuipercrest Inspir Ardath stands out as a lesson in missed opportunities. Navigating pedigrees, evaluations, and high-stakes valuations, this tale reveals the complex interplay of passion and practicality. From Ed Morwick’s initial hesitation to David Brown’s firm pricing, every decision and negotiation shaped Ardath’s unrealized potential. The emphasis on vet checks, insurance, and legal exchanges underscores the need for diligence and strategic partnerships. Ardath’s journey highlights the cost of pride and the importance of protecting investments with foresight and humility. This story serves as a reminder to balance enthusiasm with prudence to avoid squandering potential through neglected connections and misjudged valuations.

The Chosen Breed and The Holstein History by Edward Young Morwick
Anyone who appreciates history will enjoy either the US history (The Holstein History) or the Canadian History (The Chosen Breed) by Edward Morwick. Each of these books is so packed with information that they are each printed in two separate volumes.  We had a chance to interview Edward – Edward Young Morwick – Country Roads to Law Office and got a real sense of his passion and quick wit which also come shining through in his books.  Be sure to get your copies of this amazing compilation of Holstein history.

Key Takeaways:

  • David Brown’s encounter with Ardath at the Fond du Lac sale barn marked the beginning of a high-stakes saga for this extraordinary cow.
  • Ardath’s impressive physical attributes, particularly her femur bone, created significant public interest and high offers, but Brown’s asking price remained firm at a quarter-million dollars.
  • Morwick, a lawyer with substantial involvement in the dairy cattle industry, initially considered investing in Ardath but ultimately chose to purchase a real estate property instead due to disagreements over the cow’s valuation.
  • Despite being highly touted and drawing crowds, Ardath faced an untimely demise due to a lung adhesion, leading Brown to regret not securing insurance as suggested by Morwick.
  • Morwick and Brown’s professional and financial dealings added a layer of complexity and tension to their interactions, influencing the decisions related to Ardath.

Summary:

The story of K-Kuipercrest Inspir Ardath intertwines the fates of legendary dairy cattle historian Ed Morwick, lawyer, and dairy cattle savant David Brown. Ardath, an exceptional Holstein cow with an impressive lineage, captured the attention and admiration of many, including Morwick, who offered to buy a half-interest in her. However, Brown’s high valuation and refusal to settle on a lower price led Morwick to invest in real estate instead. Tragically, Ardath later died due to a lung adhesion, leaving Brown to rue his decision, as the cow could have been insured had he accepted Morwick’s offer. This tale highlights the complex interdependency of passion, investment, and fortune within the cattle business.

Learn more:

May Dairy Surge: More Cheese & Ice Cream Production, Less Whey

Check out May’s dairy trends: more cheese and ice cream, less whey. Curious about how this affects your favorite dairy products? Read the latest USDA report now.

Imagine seeing minor pricing adjustments in your preferred cheese as you enter your grocery shop. Ever wondered why? Knowing dairy production helps one to understand these changes. The USDA’s most recent milk output statistics for May are broken down in this post. We’ll look at declining whey products, a fall in butter, and rises in cheese and ice cream output. We’ll also discover which states excel in certain dairy areas. Increasing 2.1% from April and 0.7% year over year, the cheese production topped 1.21 billion pounds. Knowing trends in dairy production enables you to choose everyday goods with knowledge. Join us as we delve into the figures and trends influencing your dairy shelves.

Cheese Production Trends: Italian Varieties on the Rise 

Cheese output in May was 1.21 billion pounds, up 2.1% from April and 0.7% from the previous year. This boom mainly results from a 4.4% rise in Italian cheeses, which weighed 505 million pounds.

Italian cheeses are often sought after because of their taste and adaptability. Mozzarella is particularly well-known and heavily involved in this rise; California is a leading producer.

Conversely, American-type cheese saw a slight comeback from April. Still, it fell short by 5.7% compared to the previous year, generating 449 million pounds. Changing consumer choices and dietary patterns could help explain this decline.

The increase in Italian cheese production and the decline in American cheese underscores the shifting market dynamics. This trend points to changing customer tastes and a rising demand for diverse cheese variants. It gives manufacturers valuable insights on where to concentrate their efforts to meet market demand.

Butter Production: A Tale of Resilience and Growth

Although there was a slight drop in May’s butter output from April, the industry showed resilience, with a 4% increase from a year earlier, reaching 204 million—consistent growth amidst monthly fluctuations, which is a testament to the stability of the dairy industry.

Whey Products: Navigating the Decline in Production

Production of whey products has dropped throughout the last year. Reduced by 6.3% to 76.6 million pounds, dry whey output might affect its availability in food and animal feed.

Lactose production dropped 2.7% in newborn formulations and medications. Likewise, crucial in sports nutrition, wheyear’sein concentrate fell 3.2% from last year’s levels.

The decline in whey products could be attributed to various factors, including producers focusing on more lucrative dairy products, shifting customer tastes, or altering global demand. Understanding these factors is crucial for predicting market pricing and supply.

Ice Cream Sector: A Sweet Surge in Production 

The output of ice cream increased, especially in hard ice cream. It topped 65.97 million gallons in May, a modest but significant increase from April and up 2.3% from the previous year. This indicates a consistent demand, perhaps motivated by a change toward decadent foods during summer and warmer temperatures.

From April, low-fat ice cream also slightly increased; however, it dropped 6.1% from last year, equating to 40.2 million gallons. This might point to shifting market trends or a departure from diet-oriented choices.

May saw higher manufacturing of frozen and yogurt varieties. This promotes the rising trend of health-conscious decisions as these items are usually seen as better substitutes.

Regional Cheese Production Powerhouses: Wisconsin, California, and Idaho

Wisconsin, California, and Idaho are the top cheese producers. With 294.8 million pounds in April, Wisconsin—known for its cheddar and Mozzarella—led the way.

California comes in second with 206.5 million pounds, surpassing Italian-style cheeses like Mozzarella, which weighed 129 million pounds. Beyond cheese, California al-Idaho’s in butter and ice cream making.

Idaho’s 89.3 million pounds highlight its increasing dairy impact. These states increase the national cheese supply and California’s quality and efficiency criteria.

California’s Dairy Dominance: California and Ice Cream Production

California’s dairy business stands out because it produces butter and ice cream. Leading the country, the state showed its robust dairy infrastructure by generating 63.2 million pounds of butter in April.

With nearly 8.5 million gallons generated in April, California is the ice cream capital of the country. Whether you like frozen yogurt or creamy scoops, the state guarantees consistent availability to meet your needs.

This success results from a suitable temperature, modern conveniences, and a quality-oriented attitude. These elements, taken together, help California satisfy national cCalifornia’ss.

Remember the commitment of California’s dairy farmers, who deliver these pleasures to your table the next time you enjoy ice cream or butter.

The Bottom Line

The most recent USDA estimates indicate significant changes in dairy output, with cheese and ice cream on the rise and whey products declining. This underscores the importance of consumer knowledge in understanding the ever-shifting landscape of the dairy business. The significant surge in Italian cheese production and the resilience of the butter industry are key trends to be aware of, while the decline in whey products reflects changing market preferences. However, the surge in ice cream production highlights its enduring appeal.

States with high cheese output include Wisconsin, California, and Idaho; California also leads in butter and ice cream. These patterns direct next-sector investments and reveal customer preferences. Producers can develop and grow cheese and ice cream products. The dairy sector is still vibrant and robust, so knowledge is vital. Whether you are a consumer following trends or a manufacturer looking at fresh market prospects, these changes are essential for knowing the direction the sector will take.

Key Takeaways:

  • Total cheese output increased by 2.1% over April, reaching 1.21 billion pounds.
  • Italian type cheese production rose 4.4% year-over-year to 505 million pounds.
  • American type cheese production saw a minor increase from April but was 5.7% below last year’s levels at 488 million pounds.
  • Butter production was down 1.6% from April but up 4% from last year, totaling 204 million pounds.
  • Whey product production declined from year-ago levels, with dry whey down 6.3%, lactose down 2.7%, and whey protein concentrate down 3.2%.
  • Hard ice cream production rose to 65.97 million gallons, a slight increase from April and 2.3% higher than last year.
  • Lowfat ice cream production increased from April but was down 6.1% year-over-year at 40.2 million gallons.
  • Yogurt and frozen yogurt production saw an uptick in May.
  • Wisconsin led cheese production in April with 294.8 million pounds, followed by California and Idaho.
  • California led butter production with 63.2 million pounds in April and topped the nation in ice cream production with over 8.5 million gallons.

Summary:

The USDA’s May milk output statistics reveal significant changes in dairy production, with cheese and ice cream on the rise and whey products declining. Key trends include the surge in Italian cheese production and the resilience of the butter industry, while the decline in whey products reflects changing market preferences. However, the surge in ice cream production highlights its enduring appeal. Key states with high cheese output include Wisconsin, California, and Idaho, while California leads in butter and ice cream. These patterns direct next-sector investments and reveal customer preferences. Wisconsin leads the way with 294.8 million pounds in April, while California comes in second with 206.5 million pounds, surpassing Italian-style cheeses like Mozzarella. California’s dairy business stands out, leading the country with 63.2 million pounds of butter in April and nearly 8.5 million gallons generated, making it the ice cream capital of the country. Understanding these trends is crucial for consumers and manufacturers in the dairy sector.

Learn more:

Reducing Johne’s Disease in US Holsteins: New Genetic Insights for Dairy Farmers

Explore how cutting-edge genetic research offers US dairy farmers a powerful tool against Johne’s disease in Holsteins. Could integrating national genetic evaluations be the breakthrough for healthier herds?

Imagine a quiet but terrible illness destroying a part of your dairy herd. Through lower milk production, veterinary expenses, and early culling, Johne’s disease (JD) is an infectious intestinal illness generating major health problems and financial losses. JD is a slow-burning catastrophe in the dairy sector, and affects farm profitability and herd health. Understanding the genetic causes of US Holsteins is not just important, it’s crucial. These discoveries, made possible by genetic research, empower farmers to choose JD-resistant features, enhancing sustainability and herd health. The role of genetic research in combating JD is significant, giving farmers the tools they need to take control of their herd’s health. Including JD resistance into national genetic campaigns helps to lower the prevalence of the illness, therefore safeguarding agricultural economy and animal welfare. This fresh research, which emphasizes the role of genetic research in combating JD, shows important genetic tendencies and provides useful advice that may completely change dairy farming methods, therefore empowering fresh waves of industry innovation and development.

Combatting Johne’s Disease: Strategies and Genomic Innovations for Dairy Farmers 

Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis (MAP) causes the chronic bacterial illness known as Johne’s disease (JD) in dairy calves. It causes weight loss, ongoing diarrhea, lower milk output, and, finally, death. Although infection affects calves, dairy producers find it difficult because symptoms do not show until maturity.

JD affects the dairy sector with lower milk output, early culling, more veterinarian expenses, and even reputation loss. The illness may remain latent in herds for years because of a protracted incubation period during which infected cows disseminate MAP via feces, milk, and in-utero transmission.

Controlling JD typically involves:

  • Improving farm hygiene.
  • Managing calf-rearing practices.
  • Testing and culling positive animals.
  • Maintaining strict biosecurity.

These techniques have their limits. Intermittent MAP shedding means diagnostic tests often miss infections, and culling can be financially challenging, significantly if many cows are affected. 

Consider a mid-sized dairy farm in Wisconsin with 500 Holstein cows and a 5% prevalence rate of Johne’s disease. This translates to about 25 cows needing culling, each representing a financial loss of $1,500 to $2,000. Thus, the farm could initially hit $37,500 to $50,000, not including reduced milk production or veterinary costs. 

Frequent testing adds logistical hurdles and expenses. At $30 per sample, biannual testing of the entire herd could cost $30,000 annually. There’s also operational disruption from segregating infected animals, increased labor for handling and testing, and the need for continuous monitoring due to intermittent MAP shedding. 

For larger herds or multiple farms, these economic and logistical burdens grow even more. While genetic selection and advanced management practices promise long-term control of Johne’s disease, successful implementation must carefully balance costs, herd health, and farm sustainability.

Management strategies alone cannot eliminate JD. Still, its economic influence and frequency need more robust answers. Over time, a nationwide genetic examination for JD susceptibility, selective breeding of resistant cattle, and current management strategies might considerably lower Johne’s disease in dairy herds. This method emphasizes the need for genetic assessments in enhancing herd health and sustainability and presents a possible answer to a current issue.

Digging Deep: How Genetic and Phenotypic Data Can Unveil Johne’s Disease Susceptibility in US Holsteins 

Only one positive ELISA result from the first five parties was needed to classify a cow as JD-positive. This isn’t random; JD often appears in adult cows, so focusing on these early lactations captures the crucial infection period. This method ensures accuracy in detecting JD, laying a solid foundation for a reliable genetic evaluation. 

The first five lactations align with peak milk production periods, improving the precision of genetic parameter estimates. Using multiple parities ensures a comprehensive dataset, reducing the chance of false negatives. This thorough approach highlights the study’s dedication to accurately assessing JD susceptibility.

This method guarantees correct identification of sick animals and offers consistent information for genetic analyses.

To study the genetic basis of JD susceptibility, three models were used: 

  • Pedigree-Only Threshold Model (THR): This model utilizes pedigree data to estimate variance and heritability, capturing familial relationships’ contributions to JD susceptibility.
  • Single-Step Threshold Model (ssTHR): This model combines genotypic and phenotypic data, offering a precise estimate of genetic parameters by merging pedigree data with SNP markers.
  • Single-Step Linear Model (ssLR): This model uses a linear framework to combine genotypic and phenotypic data, providing an alternative perspective on heritability and genetic variance.

Unlocking Genetic Insights: Key Findings on Johne’s Disease Susceptibility in US Holsteins

The research results provide critical new perspectives on Johne’s disease (JD) sensitivity in US Holsteins, stressing hereditary factors and dependability measures that would help dairy producers address JD. Using threshold models, heritability estimates fell between 0.11 and 0.16; using a linear model, they fell between 0.05 and 0.09. This indicates some hereditary effects; however, environmental elements are also essential.

The reliability of estimated breeding values (EBVs) for JD susceptibility varied somewhat depending on techniques and models. The reliability of the IDEXX Paratuberculosis Screening Ab Test (IDX) ran from 0.18 to 0.22, and that of the Parachek 2 (PCK) protocol ran from 0.14 to 0.18. Though small, these principles are an essential initial step toward creating genetic assessments for JD resistance.

Even without direct genetic selection against JD sensitivity, the analysis revealed significant unfavorable genetic tendencies in this trait. Targeted breeding techniques allow one to maximize this inherent resilience. Including JD susceptibility in genetic assessments could help dairy producers lower JD incidence, lower economic losses, and enhance herd health.

The Game-Changer: Integrating Genetic Insights into Dairy Farming Practices 

Using these genetic discoveries in dairy farming seems to have a transforming power. Including Johne’s disease (JD) susceptibility into national genetic screening systems helps dairy producers make more educated breeding choices. Choosing cattle less prone to JD will progressively lessen its prevalence in herds, producing better cows and reducing economic losses.

Moreover, a nationwide genetic assessment system with JD susceptibility measures would provide consistent information to support thorough herd management plans. Farmers may improve herd resilience by concentrating on genetic features that support disease resistance, lowering JD frequency and related costs such as veterinary fees and lower milk output.

In the long term, these genetic developments will produce a better national Holstein population. The dairy business will become more efficient and profitable as more farmers embrace genetic assessment programs, which help lower the overall incidence of JD. Better animal welfare resulting from healthier cattle will increasingly influence consumer decisions and laws. 

These genetic discoveries provide a road forward for raising national dairy farming’s health and production standards and individual herd development. Including JD susceptibility into breeding techniques helps farmers safeguard their assets and guarantee a more lucrative and environmentally friendly future.

The Bottom Line

The analysis of Johne’s disease (JD) in US Holsteins emphasizes the use of genetic data to enhance herd health. By means of extensive datasets, insightful analysis, and stressing the relevance of this study in dairy farming, researchers have revealed vital new insights on JD susceptibility, which are, therefore, guiding breeding plans.

Recent research can benefit dairy farmers aiming to tackle Johne’s Disease (JD) in their herds. Using genetic insights and modern testing protocols, farmers can take steps to reduce this costly disease. 

Critical Steps for Dairy Farmers:

  • Regular Testing: Kits like the IDEXX Paratuberculosis Screening Ab Test (IDX) and Parachek 2 (PCK) screen milk samples from the first five parties.
  • Genetic Analysis: To gauge JD susceptibility, utilize SNP markers and models like pedigree-only threshold models or single-step models.
  • Selective Breeding: Incorporate JD susceptibility evaluation into your breeding programs to gradually reduce disease incidence.
  • Monitor Trends: Keep an eye on genetic trends in your herd and adjust breeding strategies accordingly.
  • Collaborate with Experts: Consult with geneticists and vets to understand JD’s genetic correlations with other important traits.

By adopting these strategies, dairy farmers can reduce the impact of Johne’s Disease, improving herd health and economic efficiency.

Including JD susceptibility in breeding campaigns helps produce healthier and more productive herds, lowering economic losses. Dairy producers should take these genetic elements into account when designing their breeding plans to fight JD properly.

Integration of JD susceptibility into national genetic assessments is next, and it is absolutely vital. This will simplify the choice process for JD resistance, therefore strengthening the dairy sector’s general resilience.

As a dairy farmer focused on herd health and productivity, including JD susceptibility in your breeding plans is crucial. Use these genetic insights to create a resilient dairy operationMake informed breeding choices today for a stronger future.

Key Takeaways:

  • Johne’s disease (JD) is a significant economic concern in the dairy industry, affecting ruminants globally.
  • Recent data show a 4.72% incidence rate of JD in US Holstein cattle.
  • Genetic and phenotypic data were analyzed using three models: THR, ssTHR, and ssLR.
  • Heritability estimates of JD susceptibility ranged from 0.05 to 0.16, indicating low to moderate genetic influence.
  • Reliability of genetic evaluations varied across models, with ssLR showing slightly higher reliability.
  • Despite no direct genetic selection, trends indicated a significant reduction in JD susceptibility over time.
  • Genetic correlations between JD susceptibility and other economically important traits were low, suggesting independent selection pathways.
  • Incorporating JD susceptibility into national genetic evaluations could help reduce incidence rates.

Summary:

Johne’s disease (JD) is a chronic bacterial illness affecting dairy cattle, causing weight loss, diarrhea, lower milk output, and death. It affects farm profitability and herd health, and genetic research is crucial for farmers to choose JD-resistant features. Controlling JD involves improving farm hygiene, managing calf-rearing practices, testing and culling positive animals, and maintaining strict biosecurity. However, these techniques have limitations, such as intermittent MAP shedding, which can lead to missed infections and financial challenges. A nationwide genetic examination, selective breeding of resistant cattle, and current management strategies could significantly lower JD in dairy herds. Integrating genetic insights into dairy farming practices could help producers make educated breeding choices, reduce JD prevalence, produce better cows, and reduce economic losses. In the long term, these genetic developments will lead to a better national Holstein population, making the dairy business more efficient and profitable.

Learn more:

Dairy Cooperative Pushes for Timely Payment Rule in Farm Bill to Protect Farmers

Can timely milk payments protect dairy farmers? Discover why Edge Dairy Farmer Cooperative is pushing for new rules in the farm bill to safeguard their livelihoods.

Imagine the dedication of a dairy farmer, tending to a herd of cows before sunrise every day, regardless of the season. This commitment is not just a personal choice but a crucial part of maintaining the stability of the dairy industry. Dairy cooperatives play a significant role in this, providing regular payments and assisting farmers in selling their milk, thereby ensuring the industry’s stability.

Processors under the Federal Milk Marketing Orders (FMMO) must pay farmers at least twice a month. Still, not all milk is insured by the FMMO, which increases financial risk.

Tim Trotter of Edge Dairy Farmer Cooperative says, “The risk we have right now, especially in the upper Midwest, is there’s an increasing amount of milk deployed and not covered by the FMMO.”

The issue of timely payments is not just a financial concern but a matter of urgency. Farmers in Minnesota, Wisconsin, northern Iowa, northern Illinois, and eastern North and South Dakota areas, where most of the country’s milk is outside the marketing pool, live in financial instability without the legal mandate for timely payments. Immediate action is needed to address this pressing issue.

Delayed payments affect individual farmers and have a ripple effect on the community’s well-being and agricultural operations. To prevent such social and economic disruptions, the farm bill needs to clearly outline and enforce conditions regarding timely milk payments.

The Untold Challenges of Depooling: Navigating the Complexities of Federal Milk Marketing Orders (FMMOs) 

Federal Milk Marketing Orders (FMMOs) guarantee producers are paid fairly and help maintain steady milk prices. These rules help manage cash flow and financial stability by requiring milk processors to pay dairy farms at least twice a month.

But “depooling” ruins this mechanism. Milk is taken from the controlled price pool depools, exempting it from the FMMO payment schedule. This might result in uneven and delayed payments, significantly affecting farmers in places where much milk is deployed.

Risk of Financial Instability for Dairy Farmers in Federal Order #30: The Urgency for Timely Payment Requirements

For farmers, particularly those under Federal Order #30 covering portions of Minnesota, Wisconsin, Iowa, Illinois, North Dakota, and South Dakota, the absence of prompt payment obligations for deployed milk exposes particular dangers. Although processors pay farmers twice a month under FMMOs, this regulation does not cover deployed milk, exposing producers to payment delays.

This financial volatility is problematic, given that 30% of the country’s milk comes outside the marketing pool and might cause cash flow problems. Delayed payments impede everyday spending, long-term sustainability, and farm upkeep.

Producing most of the deployed milk, farmers under Federal Order #30 need more with quick payment assurances. Legislative action mandating prompt payment for all milk might provide more security and assist in operational management and growth by farmers.

Advocating for Dairy Farmer Security: Why Timely Milk Payment is Crucial for Federal Order #30 Farmers

Under Tim Trotter’s direction, The Edge Dairy Farmer Cooperative seeks timely milk payments included in the farm bill. They contend this will financially safeguard dairy producers, particularly in milk deploying cases from Federal Milk Marketing Orders (FMMOs). Historically, processors have paid on time, but this is only assured with a legislative mandate. About thirty percent of the milk in the country is outside the marketing pool. Hence, prompt payment policies are significant for farmers—especially those under Federal Order #30—to minimize financial uncertainty.

Unbiased Milk Quality Assessments: The Imperative of Third-Party Verification Services for Accurate Component Testing

Verification services guarantee accurate and consistent milk component testing. These outside assessments validate the tools used to evaluate milk components like lactose, fat, and protein. This ensures exact measurements, which directly impact financial stability and payment computations. These services should be codified in the agriculture bill. It guarantees precise and objective quality tests for every dairy farmer, even those with deployed milk, safeguarding their income and encouraging industry openness.

The Bottom Line

Protecting dairy producers impacted by milk depooling depends on the farm bill, which includes prompt payment rules and verification tools. Verifying third-party milk quality and requiring processors to pay twice monthly helps lower financial risks and ensure correct pay. These steps support a consistent agricultural economy and guarantee the stability of the more significant dairy sector.

Key Takeaways:

  • Federal Milk Marketing Orders currently require processors to pay dairy farmers at least twice a month.
  • Farmers face a growing risk, particularly in the upper Midwest, as more milk is depooled and falls outside the protection of FMMOs.
  • Approximately 30% of the nation’s milk is outside the marketing pool, with many affected farmers in Federal Order #30 covering parts of the Midwest.
  • The cooperative seeks to ensure the payment requirement is legally mandated to guarantee its continuance.
  • Third-party verification services for component testing are also needed to ensure accurate milk checks, especially for depooled milk.

Summary:

Dairy farmers are vital to the dairy industry’s stability, providing regular payments and assisting in milk sales. However, not all milk is insured by the Federal Milk Marketing Orders (FMMO), leading to financial risk. Farmers in certain areas, such as Minnesota, Wisconsin, northern Iowa, northern Illinois, and eastern North and South Dakota, face financial instability without legal mandates for timely payments. Depooling disrupts the FMMO mechanism, causing uneven and delayed payments and impacting cash flow and farm upkeep. The Edge Dairy Farmer Cooperative advocates for timely milk payments in the farm bill to safeguard dairy producers, especially those under Federal Order #30. Codifying verification services in the agriculture bill would ensure accurate and consistent quality tests for every dairy farmer, safeguarding their income and encouraging industry openness. Protecting dairy producers impacted by milk depooling depends on the farm bill, which includes prompt payment rules and verification tools. Ensuring third-party milk quality and requiring processors to pay twice monthly can lower financial risks, support a consistent agricultural economy, and provide dairy sector stability.

Learn more:

USDA Reports 10-Month Decline in U.S. Milk Production: May Numbers Drop 1%

Find out why U.S. milk production has been decreasing for the past 10 months. Learn how cow numbers and milk output per cow are affecting the dairy industry. Read more.

The USDA’s preliminary May Milk output report shockingly reveals a consistent drop in U.S. milk output extending for ten months. With May showing a 1% decline from the same month last year, this steady dip points to significant shifts within the dairy sector. The continuous drop has changed the scene of milk output worldwide and pushed industry players to change their plans.

The ten-month run of low milk supply draws attention to systematic problems U.S. dairy producers face: narrow revenue margins, changing feed prices, and bad weather.

Reviewing the USDA’s data, we see: 

  • U.S. milk production fell to 19.68 billion pounds in May 2024, down 0.9% from the previous year.
  • Cow numbers decreased by 68,000 head, reflecting broader herd management strategies.
  • The average milk production per cow dropped by 3 pounds, influenced by various regional factors.
MetricMay 2024May 2023Change
U.S. Milk Production (billion pounds)19.6819.86-0.9%
U.S. Cow Numbers (million)9.359.418-68,000 head
Average Milk per Cow (pounds)2,1052,108-3 pounds
24-State Milk Production (billion pounds)18.87519.009-0.7%
24-State Cow Numbers (million)8.8938.945-52,000 head
24-State Average Milk per Cow (pounds)2,1222,125-3 pounds

A Deeper Dive into USDA’s May 2024 Dairy Estimates 

CategoryMay 2024May 2023Change
U.S. Milk Production (billion pounds)19.6819.86-0.9%
U.S. Cow Numbers (million head)9.359.42-68,000 head
U.S. Average Milk per Cow (pounds)2,1052,108-3 pounds
24-State Milk Production (billion pounds)18.8819.01-0.7%
24-State Cow Numbers (million head)8.898.94-52,000 head
24-State Average Milk per Cow (pounds)2,1222,125-3 pounds

The early projections for May 2024 from the USDA show significant changes in American dairy output. Down 0.9% from May 2023, the total U.S. milk output is 19.68 billion pounds. 9.35 million, U.S. cow counts have dropped 68,000 head from the previous year. Down three pounds year over year, the average milk output per cow is 2,105 pounds.

Milk output in the 24 central dairy states dropped 0.7% from May 2023, coming to 18.875 billion pounds. Down 52,000 head from the year before, cow counts in these states are 8.893 million. With an average milk yield per cow of 2,122 pounds, the milk output has slightly dropped from the previous year—3 pounds less.

Delving into the Dynamics of Cow Numbers: A Tale of Decline and Resurgence

YearTotal U.S. Cow Numbers (millions)24-State Cow Numbers (millions)
20209.458.92
20219.508.95
20229.478.91
20239.358.84
20249.358.89

Cow counts from the USDA show declining and then rising trends. The U.S. dairy herd dropped 68,000 head starting in May 2023, underscoring continuous industry difficulties. However, there has been a slight rise since October 2023, which has driven herd size to its most significant since late 2023.

The 24 central dairy states had a similar trend. From the year before, the combined herd of these states dropped 52,000 head, yet it somewhat recovered with a 5,000 head rise from April 2024. This points to a partial recovery in certain areas while others continue to suffer.

It’s important to note the stark differences at the state level. While Florida and South Dakota saw a gain of 27,000 heads, New Mexico experienced a dramatic drop of 42,000 heads. These variations underscore the influence of local elements such as climate, feed availability, and state-by-state economic forces.

Interwoven Influences on Milk Output per Cow: The Balance of Weather, Feed Costs, and Income Margins 

StateMay 2024 (lbs)May 2023 (lbs)Change (lbs)Change (%)
Florida2,0001,970301.52%
Minnesota2,2102,180301.38%
Wisconsin2,1002,075251.20%
Illinois2,1502,120301.42%
Iowa2,3002,270301.32%
Kansas2,1202,100200.95%
California2,0502,075-25-1.20%
Vermont2,0002,025-25-1.23%
Pennsylvania1,9802,005-25-1.25%
Indiana2,1002,125-25-1.18%

Income margins, feed prices, and regional weather have all played a role in the decline in milk yield per cow. Adverse weather patterns, such as droughts or excessive rainfall, can impact feed and water availability, which in turn can influence cow health and output. High feed prices might drive farmers to choose less nutritious substitutes, which can also affect milk output. These factors highlight the need for a comprehensive approach to address the issue, including strategies to manage weather risks and stabilize feed prices.

Income margins are crucially important. Tight margins often force difficult choices on herd management, reducing expenditures on premium feed or healthcare and, therefore, affecting milk yield per cow.

States like Florida, Minnesota, and Wisconsin reported increases in milk yield, up 15 to 30 pounds per cow, presumably owing to better local circumstances and enhanced procedures compared to year-to-year improvements.

States like California, Vermont, Pennsylvania, and Indiana reported losses of 15 to 25 pounds per cow, on the other hand. California’s ongoing drought and other difficulties, such as changing feed prices and economic pressures, highlight the careful balance between environmental elements and farming methods.

The Bottom Line

The USDA report by May shows a continuous drop in important dairy indicators—ten consecutive months of declining U.S. milk output; May 2024 down about 1% over last year. Though there have been some recent increases, national cow counts have dropped by 68,000 head. Because of regional variations in feed prices, weather, and economic constraints, milk yield per cow decreased somewhat.

These patterns point to a declining milk supply, which would be expected to raise milk prices. This change in prices could benefit medium-sized manufacturers, but it also poses challenges for the sector, including high feed prices and economic difficulties. These factors are driving the industry towards farm consolidation and increased use of technology. The decline in milk output also underscores the need for innovation and policy support to ensure sustainable development in the sector.

Given these trends, it’s clear that the sector needs to innovate to counter these challenges. Strategies such as improving feed efficiency, genetic selection, and dairy management could prove beneficial. Moreover, policy support is not just beneficial, but crucial for ensuring sustainable development in the industry.

Key Takeaways:

  • U.S. milk production for May 2024 is estimated at 19.68 billion pounds, a decrease of 0.9% compared to May 2023.
  • U.S. cow numbers have dropped to 9.35 million, down 68,000 head from the same month last year.
  • The average milk production per cow in the U.S. has marginally declined by 3 pounds, totaling 2,105 pounds per cow.
  • In the 24 major dairy states, milk production is down 0.7%, with total output at 18.875 billion pounds.
  • These 24 states have seen a reduction in cow numbers by 52,000, now standing at 8.893 million.
  • Despite the overall decline, some states like Florida and South Dakota show robust growth in cow numbers and milk output.
  • Conversely, significant decreases in milk production have been observed in states such as New Mexico and California.

Summary: 

The USDA’s preliminary May Milk output report shows a 1% decline in U.S. milk output for ten months, indicating significant shifts within the dairy sector. The ten-month run of low milk supply is attributed to narrow revenue margins, changing feed prices, and bad weather. The total U.S. milk output is 19.68 billion pounds, with cow numbers decreasing by 68,000 head. The average milk production per cow dropped by 3 pounds, influenced by regional factors. The U.S. dairy herd dropped 68,000 heads starting in May 2023, underscoring industry difficulties. However, there has been a slight rise since October 2023, driving herd size to its most significant since late 2023. Interwoven influences on milk output per cow include income margins, feed prices, and regional weather. States like Florida, Minnesota, and Wisconsin reported increases in milk yield, while California, Vermont, Pennsylvania, and Indiana reported losses.

Learn more:

From Data to Dollars: Small Steps to Maximize Dairy Profits Through Accurate Herd Management

Maximize dairy profits with accurate data. Discover how small steps in herd management can transform efficiency and profitability. Ready to optimize your farm’s success?

Even a single percentage point can have a big impact on the ever-changing realm of modern dairy farming. Think of the inspirational example of a Wisconsin dairy farm that, following a thorough data management system, saw a startling 15% rise in general profitability. From careful data collecting to strategic analysis, the path this farm takes shows the transforming power of accurate data. Such success stories highlight how precisely data management can help your dairy farm to reach hitherto unattainable levels of profitability and efficiency. Regardless of its scope, every bit of data can revolutionize the profitability and efficiency of your farm.

Little actions like accurately noting a cow’s health event or updating pen counts add to significant changes in herd health and feeding practices, increasing farm profitability.

“A small mistake can become a major problem, but accurate data will guide your farm toward unheard-of success.”

The foundation of reasonable herd control is accurate data. Correct data entering produces insightful reports, trend analysis, and benchmarks to guide your decisions. Making the effort to gather accurate data opens quick insights that can change your business.

All set to delve into your daily records? Little adjustments might pay off enormously for a dairy farm to run more profitably and effectively.

The Cascade Effect of Data Accuracy in Herd Management 

Every herd management event depends on data capture accuracy. One small mistake—such as a nutritional need or a wrong health treatment—may have a domino effect throughout your dairy. For instance, the herd manager may make poor decisions if a breeder misses an insemination date, producing erroneous dry-off lists and calving schedules. As a result, the feeder might use the wrong pen counts, which results in improperly made rations. This first error can affect output and raise feed costs, compromising the farm’s profitability and efficiency.

Dairy producers must understand that exact data collection is absolutely vital. It improves productivity and efficiency and forms the basis of wise decisions. Any deviation from the norm should prompt quick research and correction.

Imagine a situation when a sick cow’s prescription is not precisely recorded on a farm. The monitoring produces missed production targets, rising medical expenses, emergency veterinary intervention, and changed reproductive plans. The situation worsens when the nutritionist changes feed based on erroneous data, resulting in nutritional imbalances. Such errors might turn into expensive mistakes avoided with careful record-keeping.

Little changes in inaccurate data recording can greatly enhance herd health and farm performance in dairy farming. Reliable data reveals trends, guides your farm toward its full potential using benchmarks, and supports better decisions.

Plugging Data Gaps: Ensuring Every Detail is Captured 

Examine every element of your farm to find holes in your present data procedures and avoid the traps of erroneous data. Reports, trend identification, benchmark setting, and cost analysis for more profitable decisions can all be produced by herd management tools. These tools are only as valuable as the data you enter. Accurate data records give your herd and farm quick insights. For instance, your herd management system’s alerts and key performance indicators help you intervene early when some cows exceed recommended health levels. Timeliness and accuracy of insight help you reach your objectives and strengthen your bottom line. To avoid the pitfalls of inaccurate data, scrutinize every aspect of your farm to identify gaps in your current data practices. Herd management tools can generate reports, identify trends, set benchmarks, and evaluate costs for more profitable decisions. However, these tools are only as effective as the data you input. Recording accurate data provides timely insights for your herd and farm. For example, setting key performance indicators and alerts within your herd management software system enables early intervention when sure cows surpass custom health thresholds. Accurate, timely insights help improve your bottom line and achieve your goals.

Herd Management Tools: The Foundation of Modern Dairy Farm Efficiency 

Modern dairy farm profitability and efficiency are within your control, thanks to the power of herd management tools. When used correctly, these tools can produce thorough reports, reveal trends, and offer benchmarks to evaluate herd management expenses. The key to unlocking their potential lies in the accuracy of the data you input. By ensuring accurate data entry, you can prevent adverse chain reactions that could lead to poor decisions impacting the whole farm. This control over your data and its impact on your farm’s performance is in your hands.

Essential tools for herd management consist of the following:

  • DairyComp305: Excellent for tracking reproductive metrics, health records, and production data. Its reports help identify trends for better management decisions.
  • PCDART: Integrates production, reproduction, and health data for thorough herd analysis and benchmarking against industry standards.
  • Afimilk: Features milk meters and cow activity monitors for precise data collection and insightful analysis.
  • BoviSync: A cloud-based system offering real-time data access and integration of various herd activities to optimize operations.

By applying these tools, farmers can set automated alerts for important performance indicators, guaranteeing timely response when necessary. Standardizing data entry throughout the team helps lower mistakes and preserve data integrity, guiding better decisions and enhancing farm operations.

Strategic Imperatives: Using KPIs and Alerts for Proactive Herd Management

Setting key performance indicators (KPIs) and alerts within your herd management system is vital in the ecology of a dairy farm. Correct data helps you create quantifiable goals for improved herd health and early intervention. For disorders like mastitis, establishing thresholds can set off alarms that let you respond quickly to avoid complications.

KPIMeaningIdeal Score Range
Milk Yield per CowThe average amount of milk produced by each cow in a specified period.8,000 – 10,000 lbs per lactation
Reproductive Success RateThe percentage of cows that become pregnant within a specific timeframe after breeding.30% – 35%
Feed EfficiencyThe ratio of milk produced to the amount of feed consumed.1.4 – 1.6 lbs of milk per lb of dry matter intake
Somatic Cell Count (SCC)A measurement of cell concentration in milk, indicating udder health and milk quality.< 200,000 cells/ml
Calving IntervalThe average time period between successive calvings in the herd.13 – 15 months

KPIs support your tracking of performance indicators, including feed conversion ratios and milk yield. These benchmarks help make data-driven decisions, enhancing management techniques and resource allocation. Alerts provide early warnings for deviations, enabling proactive rather than reactive control. This structure maintains your agility, responsiveness, and alignment with profitability objectives, guaranteeing your dairy business’s success.

Standardization: The Keystone of Accurate Data Management in Dairy Farms 

Effective treatments and accurate data are not just a possibility, but a certainty when you standardize protocols within your herd management system. Clear, consistent procedures ensure that every staff member can enter and apply treatments precisely, leading to accurate herd health data tracking. For example, following a standard process for treating a cow with mastitis guarantees exact data collection. This standardization provides a sense of security and confidence, knowing that your data is reliable and your decisions are based on accurate information. 

Differentials develop without standardization. Data discrepancies can hide treatment efficacy and trend identification if one employee notes treatments immediately. At the same time, another waits until the end of the day, perhaps aggravating minor problems into major health crises.

Without set procedures, comparing health trends to industry benchmarks also becomes challenging. For instance, a farm that neglected to standardize calving event records experienced underreported complications, distorting health statistics and postponing required treatments.

On the other hand, standardized data entry and treatment approaches produce clear, practical health insights. Regular records allow one to spot trends in seasonal diseases, facilitating proactive management and enhancing general farm profitability and efficiency. The long-term success of your dairy operations depends on your using consistent procedures. 

On the other hand, clear, practical health insights are produced by standardized data entry and treatment approaches. Regular records allow one to spot seasonal disease trends, facilitating proactive management and enhancing general farm profitability and efficiency. The long-term success of your dairy operations depends on your consistent use of procedures.  However, the reality remains that the number of dairy farms continues to shrink, making it imperative for existing farms to optimize every possible aspect of their operations to stay competitive.   (Read more:  ‘Once plentiful in Skagit County, the number of dairy farms continues to shrink‘)

Transforming Daily Operations with Mobile Apps: Enhancing Dairy Farm Efficiency Through Real-Time Data Entry and Retrieval 

Including mobile apps in herd management systems transforms daily operations by allowing on-the-go data entry and retrieval. These applications save time spent on hand data entry by allowing real-time data capture straight from the parlor, barn, or offsite site. Farm teams can immediately record health events, treatments, and other vital data points by using mobile capabilities, guaranteeing constant accuracy.

Mobile apps reduce pointless office visits, thus improving efficiency. Multiple pass tasks become one pass, lowering the inherent error risks in paper-based systems. For a veterinarian’s visit, for instance, accessing and updating a cow’s history guarantees accurate and timely entries, enhancing decision-making.

Mobile apps also reduce data entry mistakes. Direct information recording at the source lowers the possibility of miswriting cow IDs or inaccurate entries. This real-time data capture results in more accurate reports and analyses, guaranteeing data integrity. Mobile apps enable the whole team by making herd management systems available from any point on the farm, improving output and supporting operational objectives.

Optimizing Herd Management Through Tailored User Access Levels

Control of user access in your herd management system guarantees that every team member possesses the precise information required to perform their roles. Customized permissions support data integrity and simplify processes. For example, a breeder must have access to cow performance and breeding statistics to guide their breeding decisions. The herd manager needs complete access to oversee dry-offs and track health events. Updated pen counts and nutrition information help the feeder create exact ration formulations. The veterinarian also requires access to health records and guidelines for accurate treatment. Customizing these access levels will help your team members concentrate on their particular responsibilities, thus improving the general farm performance.

Managing user access levels within your herd management system ensures each team member has the data they need to excel in their roles. Tailored permissions streamline operations and uphold data integrity. For instance, breeders need access to cow performance and breeding data to make informed breeding decisions. The herd manager requires comprehensive access to monitor health events and manage dry-offs—the feeder benefits from updated pen counts and nutrition info for precise ration formulations. Meanwhile, the veterinarian needs access to health records and treatment protocols for accurate care. By customizing these access levels, your team members can focus on their specific tasks, enhancing overall farm efficiency.

The Indispensable Role of Early Life Data in Calf Management

Every early event of a calf fundamentally determines her future as a cow. Accurate and consistent data entering from birth prepares the ground for lifetime health and productivity. Recording specifics on her weight, diet, and health interventions helps build a profile that directs the following actions. This painstaking record exposes trends and ideas helpful for nutrition, breeding, and health planning. 

Early data sets the standard for all subsequent measurements; thus, its accuracy is quite important. Standardizing data entry increases dependability, reduces mistakes, and guarantees consistency. Digitally capturing calf-side data boosts accuracy and streamlines workflows for real-time adjustments. 

Data management tools that support protocol-driven capture reduce errors, ensuring protocol compliance. Monitoring data access and calibrating user levels maintains data integrity. Over time, this approach enhances the calf’s transition to a productive cow, boosting overall efficiency and profitability.

Fostering a Culture of Continuous Improvement: Unlocking Dairy Farm Potential

The significance of a culture of continuous improvement on a dairy farm cannot be understated. Engage your team and regularly evaluate your practices to unlock new efficiencies. Foster an environment where asking questions is championed. Equip staff with the skills through ongoing education and training programs focused on data management. 

Collaborate with herd management partners to stay updated on industry advancements. These professionals offer invaluable insights and innovative solutions that can profoundly impact your farm’s operations. You’ll find areas ripe for optimization as you explore your herd management systems. 

Maintain an inquisitive mindset and a commitment to learning. This proactive approach ensures your farm’s data remains a powerful asset, driving profitability and achieving long-term goals. Recognize that every incremental improvement contributes to your dairy’s broader success, empowering your team to strive for excellence.

The Bottom Line

Accurate data management is the cornerstone of dairy farm efficiency. Every action, from data capture to health trend analysis, supports informed decision-making and farm performance. Minor inaccuracies can trigger chain reactions across operations, affecting everything from feeding routines to health management. By strategically using herd management tools, setting critical KPIs, and leveraging mobile apps, farms can streamline operations, ensure data integrity, and maintain a healthier, more productive herd. 

Every data point is crucial for dairy farmers. Capturing and analyzing accurate data helps identify gaps, evaluate trends, and implement timely interventions to enhance profitability and efficiency. Focusing on data standardization and optimizing user access levels fosters continuous improvement. This ensures that each calf’s early life events are precisely recorded, maximizing future milk production and cow longevity. 

Small steps in tightening data management can lead to substantial payoffs. Accurate data entry links the current herd state to its historical data. It sets the foundation for future success, making diligent data management vital for any dairy farmer aiming for long-term prosperity.

Key Takeaways:

  • Accurate Data Entry: Ensure every herd management event is captured accurately to avoid cascading errors.
  • Identify Data Gaps: Conduct regular audits of your data management practices to identify and rectify any gaps.
  • Implement Herd Management Tools: Use robust tools to generate reports, discover trends, and make informed decisions.
  • Set KPIs and Alerts: Use key performance indicators and alerts for early intervention on health events and other critical metrics.
  • Standardize Protocols: Establish and maintain standardized protocols for data entry and treatment administration.
  • Utilize Mobile Apps: Leverage mobile herd management apps to enable real-time data entry and reduce the risk of errors.
  • Manage User Access: Adjust user access levels within your herd management system to ensure team members have the data they need.
  • Capture Early Life Data: Digitally recording data during the early life stages of a calf can significantly impact future performance.
  • Foster Continuous Improvement: Encourage a culture of continuous learning and improvement in data management practices.
  • Collaborate with Partners: Work closely with herd management partners and support teams to optimize data usage.


Summary: Data management is crucial in modern dairy farming, as it significantly impacts profitability and efficiency. A Wisconsin dairy farm saw a 15% increase in profitability after implementing a comprehensive data management system. Accurate data provides insights into herd health and feeding practices, leading to significant changes in farm profitability. Herd management tools generate reports, identify trends, set benchmarks, and evaluate costs for more profitable decisions. Key performance indicators (KPIs) and alerts are essential for tracking performance indicators. Standardization ensures accurate data entry and treatment application. Incorporating mobile apps into herd management systems transforms daily operations by allowing on-the-go data entry and retrieval. A culture of continuous improvement and collaboration with herd management partners can optimize farm data and drive profitability and long-term goals.

USDA and UW-Madison Break Ground on Cutting-Edge Dairy Research Facility to Boost Sustainable Farming

Explore the groundbreaking potential of the new dairy research facility spearheaded by the USDA and UW-Madison. Interested in the next frontier of dairy innovation? Continue reading.

Imagine a future where dairy farming is more sustainable, efficient, and environmentally friendly. Thanks to a new partnership between the USDA’s Agricultural Research Service (ARS) and the University of Wisconsin-Madison‘s College of Agricultural and Life Sciences (CALS), this vision is becoming a reality. They have begun constructing a state-of-the-art dairy research facility in Prairie Du Sac, Wisconsin, ushering in a new era for dairy science and sustainable farming. 

The significance of this collaboration cannot be overstated: 

  • The USDA and UW-Madison are combining their expertise to advance dairy research.
  • This facility will significantly enhance our understanding and application of sustainable farming practices.
  • The project aims to transform the dairy industry, making it more resilient to climate change.

“This facility is a game-changer for the field of dairy science,” said one of the project leaders. “By bringing together cutting-edge technology and expert research, we can address key challenges in dairy farming, from improving soil health and forage quality to optimizing milk production and nutrient-use efficiency.”

Pioneering Partners in Agricultural Advancements 

The USDA’s Agricultural Research Service (ARS), established in 1953, is the leading research arm of the United States Department of Agriculture. ARS addresses critical agricultural challenges with innovative solutions that impact both domestic and global food supplies. By utilizing advanced technologies and facilities, ARS aims to improve agricultural productivity, sustainability, and the welfare of rural communities. 

Since 1889, the University of Wisconsin-Madison’s College of Agricultural and Life Sciences (CALS) has been a prominent institution in agricultural research and education. CALS focuses on developing scientific knowledge and practical solutions in crop science, animal health, and ecosystem sustainability, while preparing future agricultural professionals through a robust curriculum and a commitment to innovation. 

The collaborative efforts between ARS and UW-Madison’s CALS have historically driven significant advancements in dairy research, essential to Wisconsin’s identity as “America’s Dairyland.” This partnership has led to improvements in milk production, quality, animal welfare, and environmental practices. Through shared research and expertise, ARS and CALS continue to enhance Wisconsin’s dairy industry.

Innovative Dairy Research at the Heart of Wisconsin’s Agricultural Future 

Located in Prairie Du Sac, Wisconsin, this new dairy research facility, set to complete in 2027, aims to revolutionize agricultural science. Designed with advanced technologies, it features robotic milking systems, enhancing efficiency and precision in dairy farming. The greenhouse gas emission measurement chambers highlight a focus on sustainability, allowing precise monitoring and reduction of environmental impact

An advanced animal nutrition unit will optimize dairy production by enhancing nutritional profiles. This unit complements state-of-the-art laboratories for agronomy and dairy science, facilitating a holistic approach to research. These labs, equipped with the latest technologies, focus on soil health, forage production, and ecosystem services. Together, they offer unparalleled opportunities for research that mirrors the complexities of modern dairy farms, driving innovations for productivity and environmental stewardship.

Harnessing Technological Integration and Methodological Diversity for Dairy Research Excellence 

This cutting-edge facility is poised to revolutionize dairy research by seamlessly integrating advanced technologies and diverse methodologies. A key innovation is the inclusion of robotic milking systems, which streamline milking and provide invaluable data on yield and quality. This data is essential for evaluating the effects of various nutritional and management strategies. 

The advanced animal nutrition unit will enable detailed studies on the impact of different feed formulations on both milk production and cow health. By precisely controlling and monitoring diets, researchers aim to optimize nutrient-use efficiency, thereby reducing waste and enhancing the sustainability of dairy operations

Greenhouse gas emission measurement chambers will allow scientists to quantify the environmental impact of various farming practices. These chambers will identify strategies to effectively mitigate emissions, thereby improving the overall ecosystem services provided by dairy farms

State-of-the-art laboratories in agronomy will support investigations into soil health and forage production. Controlled experiments on soil treatments and agronomical practices will be validated through field research, ensuring that laboratory findings are applicable in real-world settings. 

The facility’s focus on comprehensive studies of dairy forage agroecosystems will advance integrated research on manure management and nutrient cycling. By improving the application of manure and nutrients back to the fields, the facility aims to boost soil fertility and health, thus ensuring long-term productivity

Ultimately, this facility will support holistic and interdisciplinary approaches to dairy farming challenges. By bridging the gap between lab research and field application, it will generate actionable insights to enhance dairy nutrition, increase milk production, improve ecosystem services, and build climate resilience. This project marks a significant advancement for both the agricultural research community and the dairy industry at large.

Building Authentic Simulations: Integrating Farm-Level Dynamics into Dairy Research

Central to the facility’s design is its dedication to replicating the dynamic conditions of modern dairy farms. Featuring free-stall pens and automated milking systems, the facility represents a crucial shift in dairy research methodologies. Free-stall pens will enhance cow comfort and welfare, allowing researchers to observe behavioral patterns and health metrics of dairy cows. Automated milking systems will enable precise data collection on milk yield, milking frequency, and udder health. This realistic simulation of farm environments ensures research findings are accurate, relevant, and easily applicable, driving innovations that enhance productivity and sustainability in dairy farming.

Revolutionizing Agroecosystem Studies with a Focus on Dairy Forage Systems 

The construction of this new dairy research facility marks a significant shift towards comprehensive agroecosystem studies, with a particular emphasis on dairy forage systems. By integrating every aspect of dairy production—from soil health to nutrient cycling—the facility aims to foster a robust, interconnected research environment. This approach enriches our understanding of dairy farm ecosystems and identifies sustainable practices beneficial for both the environment and agricultural output. 

Central to these studies is the focus on manure management. Traditional methods often neglect the potential of manure as a resource. Researchers at the facility will explore advanced manure management techniques to optimize nutrient recovery and reduce environmental impacts. Improving nutrient application back to the field is key to maintaining soil fertility and supporting forage growth, thereby promoting a sustainable agricultural model. 

Incorporating these practices into the research agenda will enable the facility to become a leader in sustainable dairy farming. By refining nutrient management within the agroecosystem, the facility will contribute to resilient farming practices that withstand environmental stress and adapt to climate changes. This groundbreaking work not only advances dairy science but also sets a global precedent for eco-friendly agriculture.

A Synergistic Collaboration: USDA ARS and UW-Madison CALS Elevate Dairy Science and Sustainability 

As a keystone of American dairy research, the collaboration between the USDA’s Agricultural Research Service (ARS) and UW-Madison’s College of Agricultural and Life Sciences (CALS) exemplifies a synergistic relationship that greatly enhances their ability to serve Wisconsin’s dairy industry. This strategic partnership leverages the USDA’s expansive resources and agricultural expertise alongside UW-Madison CALS’ cutting-edge research and strong roots in the state’s farming community. By uniting their strengths, both institutions can more effectively and innovatively address the complex challenges the dairy sector faces. 

This collaboration fosters a more comprehensive research approach, integrating advanced technologies and methodologies to develop forward-thinking solutions. With state-of-the-art laboratories and equipment like robotic milking systems and greenhouse gas emission measurement chambers, the facility enables groundbreaking studies that tackle modern farming practices and sustainability issues. These advancements are essential for improving soil health, forage quality, and dairy nutrition, enhancing overall productivity and the sustainability of dairy operations. 

The partnership also plays a crucial role in disseminating research findings and best practices to the wider farming community. Through joint initiatives and extension programs, insights from the research facility can be turned into practical strategies for farmers across the state. This not only magnifies the impact of their research but also ensures Wisconsin’s dairy industry remains a leader in innovation and resilience. In essence, the collaboration between the USDA and UW-Madison CALS is a vital force in bolstering the vitality and sustainability of America’s dairy heartland.

The Bottom Line

This new dairy research facility marks a significant advance in agricultural science and sustainability. By leveraging modern technologies and innovative research methods, it aims to strengthen the systems that support both environmental health and economic stability. Such visionary projects are essential for sustaining farming ecosystems and securing a resilient future for the dairy industry. As this project progresses, it is crucial for stakeholders and the community to stay informed and engaged. The outcomes of this research will reach far beyond Wisconsin, setting a global standard for sustainable and efficient agriculture.

Key Takeaways:

  • The USDA and UW-Madison are constructing a cutting-edge dairy research facility in Prairie Du Sac, Wisconsin, to be completed by 2027.
  • The facility will feature advanced technologies such as robotic milking systems, greenhouse gas emission measurement chambers, and specialized labs for agronomy and dairy science.
  • Research will focus on improving soil health, forage production and quality, dairy nutrition, milk production, and resilience to climate change.
  • The facility aims to replicate modern dairy farm conditions, enabling holistic studies on dairy forage agroecosystems and nutrient management.
  • The partnership amplifies collaboration with Wisconsin’s dairy industry, aiming to disseminate research findings and best practices to the broader farming community.

Summary: The USDA’s Agricultural Research Service (ARS) and the University of Wisconsin-Madison’s College of Agricultural and Life Sciences (CALS) have partnered to build a state-of-the-art dairy research facility in Prairie Du Sac, Wisconsin. The facility aims to advance dairy research, improve sustainable farming practices, and make the dairy industry more resilient to climate change. Key challenges in dairy farming include improving soil health and forage quality, optimizing milk production, and nutrient-use efficiency. The facility will incorporate advanced technologies and methodologies, including robotic milking systems that streamline milking and provide valuable data on yield and quality. It will also enable detailed studies on the impact of different feed formulations on milk production and cow health, aiming to optimize nutrient-use efficiency and reduce waste. Greenhouse gas emission measurement chambers will quantify the environmental impact of farming practices, identifying strategies to mitigate emissions and improve ecosystem services. The facility will also focus on comprehensive studies of dairy forage agroecosystems, advancing integrated research on manure management and nutrient cycling. The partnership plays a crucial role in disseminating research findings and best practices to the wider farming community through joint initiatives and extension programs.

U.S. Cheese Production in April: Italian Cheese Surges, American Cheese Declines

Dive into April’s U.S. cheese production trends. Curious about the rise of Italian cheese and the decline of American cheese? Uncover the compelling data and regional details.

April presented a mixed landscape for U.S. cheese production, with both promising gains and notable declines. According to the USDA, total cheese output, excluding cottage cheese, reached 1.19 billion pounds, up 1.8% year-over-year but down 3% from March. Italian-type cheese production rose by 6.2% from last year to 504 million pounds, though it fell 2.8% from March. On the other hand, American cheese production declined by 4.7% year-over-year and 4.3% from March, totaling 468 million pounds. 

“The mixed trends in U.S. cheese production signal both resilience and challenges within the industry,” the USDA report suggests.

CategoryProduction (Million Pounds)Year-Over-Year ChangeMonth-Over-Month Change
Total Cheese (excluding cottage)1,190+1.8%-3.0%
Italian-Type Cheese504+6.2%-2.8%
American Cheese468-4.7%-4.3%
Butter208+5.3%-1.0%
Nonfat Dry Milk173-12.7%
Skim Milk Powder36.3-20.8%
Dry Whey+2.1%
Lactose-1.5%
Whey Protein Concentrate-6.1%
Hard Ice Cream64.7 million gallons+7.3%

Mixed Signals in April U.S. Cheese Production Reflecting Varied Trends 

According to the USDA data, total cheese output, excluding cottage cheese, reached 1.19 billion pounds in April. This marks a 1.8% increase compared to the same period last year but shows a 3% decrease from March. The production dynamics underscore a mixed trend in U.S. cheese production for the month, reflecting both year-over-year growth and month-over-month decline.

Italian Cheeses Shine Year-Over-Year Despite Monthly Dip

Italian-type cheese production showcased a remarkable upturn, reflecting a year-over-year surge of 6.2%, culminating at 504 million pounds. Despite this annual growth, the month-over-month comparison revealed a marginal dip of 2.8% from March. This duality underscores both the strong demand for Italian cheeses over the year and the seasonal or market-driven fluctuations that influence monthly production volumes.

American Cheese Production Faces Significant Challenges in April

Amid the intricate landscape of U.S. cheese production, American cheese has faced a particularly challenging month. Specifically, April witnessed a decline in American cheese output, both when compared year-over-year and month-over-month. Production fell by 4.7% from April last year, resulting in a total output of 468 million pounds. The month-over-month comparison is similarly bleak, with a 4.3% decrease from March, accentuating the downward trend in this particular cheese category. This dual decline highlights ongoing shifts within the industry, signaling potential adjustments in consumer demand and production focus.

Butter Production Sees Minor Monthly Dip Amidst Impressive Annual Growth 

Butter production trends exhibited a complex pattern, reflecting the overarching variability in the dairy sector. While there was a minor decline of just over 1% in butter output compared to March, the sector demonstrated resilience with a notable 5.3% increase compared to the same period last year. This duality in trends is indicative of broader market dynamics and seasonal production adjustments. In total, April’s butter production reached 208 million pounds, underscoring both the short-term and long-term shifts in the dairy landscape.

Sharp Declines in Dry Dairy Products Highlight April’s Downturn

Dry dairy products presented a downward trend in April, with significant declines observed in both nonfat dry milk and skim milk powder production. Nonfat dry milk saw a steep reduction, recording a 12.7% drop to reach a total of 173 million pounds. Skim milk powder production experienced an even sharper decline of 20.8%, culminating in a total output of 36.3 million pounds compared to the same period last year.

Contrasting Fortunes Within Dry Dairy Production Reflect April’s Complex Landscape 

Nevertheless, not all dry dairy products shared the same fate. Dry whey production, for instance, edged up by 2.1%, offering a glimmer of optimism amidst broader declines in the sector. Specifically, dry whey output reached notable levels, counteracting the overarching downtrend. Conversely, lactose production did not fare as well, registering a 1.5% decline. Even more striking was the significant 6.1% decrease in whey protein concentrate production. Collectively, these figures underscore the mixed results within the dry dairy product landscape, highlighting areas of both growth and notable declines.

Unprecedented Fluctuations in Frozen Dairy Production: Hard Ice Cream Surges While Other Categories Slide

Frozen dairy product output varied significantly in April, illustrating a mixture of trends within the industry. The production of hard ice cream notably climbed by an impressive 7.3%, reaching 64.7 million gallons. This increase stands in stark contrast to the declines observed in other frozen dairy categories. The production of low-fat ice cream, sherbet, and frozen yogurt all experienced downturns, highlighting the sector’s fluctuations and the diverse consumer preferences shaping production dynamics.

Regional Production Trends: Wisconsin’s Cheddar Supremacy and California’s Mozzarella Dominance

In examining regional production trends, the data reveals that Wisconsin continues to dominate the Cheddar cheese market, producing an impressive 60.38 million pounds in April. California follows, contributing 21.29 million pounds to the nation’s Cheddar cheese supply. 

Turning attention to Mozzarella, California leads with a substantial output of 134.14 million pounds, while Wisconsin is not far behind, generating 93.13 million pounds. This makes California the unrivaled leader in Mozzarella production, though Wisconsin’s figures are commendable. 

When looking at overall cheese production, Wisconsin emerges as the top-producing state with an aggregate output of 281.48 million pounds. California comes in second, followed closely by Idaho and New Mexico. These states collectively form the backbone of the U.S. cheese manufacturing industry, each playing a crucial role in meeting domestic and international demand.

The Bottom Line

April’s cheese production data from the USDA paints a complex picture of the dairy industry, characterized by both advancements and setbacks. Italian-type cheeses exhibited impressive year-over-year growth, driven by a notable 6.2% increase, even as they faced a slight month-over-month decrease. In stark contrast, American cheese suffered significant declines both annually and monthly, highlighting underlying production challenges. 

The broader dairy landscape reflected similar dualities. Butter production experienced a modest monthly dip but demonstrated robust annual growth. The production of dry dairy products such as nonfat dry milk and skim milk powder saw sharp drops, whereas dry whey managed a slight increase. 

Frozen dairy products also showed variability, with hard ice cream production surging, while other categories like low-fat ice cream and frozen yogurt declined. Regionally, Wisconsin and California continued to dominate specific cheese categories, underscoring their pivotal roles in national dairy production

Overall, these intricate trends underscore the multifaceted nature of the U.S. dairy industry, highlighting areas of growth and the need for strategic adjustments in response to declining segments.

Key Takeaways:

  • Total cheese production in April saw a slight year-over-year increase of 1.8%, despite a 3% drop from March.
  • Italian-type cheese production rose by 6.2% year-over-year but decreased by 2.8% from the previous month.
  • American cheese production experienced declines both year-over-year and month-over-month, down by 4.7% and 4.3% respectively.
  • Butter production was up by 5.3% compared to April of last year, although it saw a minor decline from March.
  • Dry dairy products faced significant declines: nonfat dry milk dropped by 12.7% and skim milk powder by 20.8% year-over-year.
  • Dry whey production slightly increased by 2.1%, while lactose and whey protein concentrate production declined by 1.5% and 6.1% respectively.
  • Hard ice cream production surged by 7.3%, but low-fat ice cream, sherbet, and frozen yogurt production all decreased.
  • Wisconsin led in Cheddar cheese production, contributing 60.38 million pounds, whereas California was the top producer of Mozzarella with 134.14 million pounds.

Summary: In April, U.S. cheese production experienced a mixed landscape, with both positive and negative trends. The USDA reported a total cheese output of 1.19 billion pounds, up 1.8% year-over-year but down 3% from March. Italian-type cheese production rose by 6.2% to 504 million pounds, while American cheese production declined by 4.7% year-over-year and 4.3% from March, totaling 468 million pounds. This dual decline highlights ongoing shifts within the industry, signaling potential adjustments in consumer demand and production focus. Butter production saw a minor monthly dip, while dry dairy products showed a downward trend, with significant declines observed in nonfat dry milk and skim milk powder production. Dry whey production edged up by 2.1%, but lactose production and whey protein concentrate production also saw a decline. Frozen dairy product output varied significantly, with hard ice cream production climbing by 7.3% to reach 64.7 million gallons. Wisconsin continues to dominate the Cheddar cheese market, producing an impressive 60.38 million pounds in April.

Send this to a friend