Archive for winter

Maximize Dairy Profits with High-Quality Corn Silage: Top Strategies for Success

Maximize dairy profits with high-quality corn silage. Discover top strategies to boost milk production, enhance nutrient availability, and reduce feed costs. Ready to optimize?

Consider increasing your dairy operation’s profitability by concentrating on a single critical input: high-quality corn silage. This approach maximizes milk output and dairy farm profitability by boosting nutrient availability and lowering feed expenditures. High-quality corn silage may make the difference between straining to fulfill output targets and effectively reaching optimal performance. A 2023 dataset of over 1,800 samples found that high-quality silage contains about 11% more starch, resulting in increased propionate production—a critical volatile fatty acid for milk. Superior silage also enhances dry matter intake, which boosts milk production. Focusing on high-quality corn silage is more than better feed; it may considerably improve your farm’s bottom line. The cost difference between feeding top-tier vs lower-quality silage may be tens of thousands of dollars per year, demonstrating the enormous worth of this approach.

Setting the Stage for Success: The Vital Role of Corn Silage in Dairy Production

Corn silage is more than simply a feed alternative; it is an essential component of dairy farming that plays a crucial role in satisfying the nutritional needs of dairy cows. This high-energy forage, especially for high-producing herds, can substantially impact an operation’s production and profitability, leading to healthier and more productive cows.

The time of corn silage harvest is critical in the dairy calendar. This phase concludes months of agronomic planning, which includes field selection, hybrid selection, and nutrient and weed management strategies. The quality of corn silage gathered today will directly influence the nutritional content of the diet throughout the year, determining milk output and overall dairy profitability.

Properly managed corn silage may improve nutritional availability, fiber digestibility, and starch levels, promoting cow health and milk output. This, in turn, minimizes the demand for additional feeds, cutting total feed expenditures and leading to a more economically and sustainably run dairy farm.

Furthermore, adequately cut and stored corn silage may offer a steady nutrition supply, ensuring constant milk production throughout the winter when fresh forage is scarce. The process from cutting to feeding out involves meticulous care and attention to detail, striving to retain the silage’s nutritional integrity and preserving its value throughout the year.

Concentrating on this critical forage meets immediate nutritional demands while laying a solid basis for next year’s production cycle. Precisely handling each phase, from planting to harvest and storage, can benefit milk output and the dairy operation’s economic sustainability.

Unlocking the Secrets of High-Quality Corn Silage: Insights from 1,800 Samples

Researchers analyzed over 1,800 corn silage samples from the 2023 crop year to identify critical quality indicators distinguishing top-performing silage. Analyzing essential components, including starch, fiber, and fermentation profiles, found considerable differences between high- and low-quality samples. High starch availability in top-tier samples increases propionate formation in the rumen, which is an essential acid for milk production. These better samples also had lower Neutral Detergent Fiber (NDF) and more Undigestible Neutral Detergent Fiber (UNDF240), indicating more excellent fiber digestibility and dry matter ingestion capacity.

The fermentation profiles of high-quality silage show more significant amounts of lactic acid and lower levels of acetic acid, suggesting quicker and more efficient fermentation. Furthermore, reduced ash levels in these samples indicate little soil contamination, lowering the dangers of soil-borne yeasts and clostridial organisms, which may impair fermentation quality. In summary, emphasizing high-quality corn silage improves nutritional availability, milk output, and dairy profitability.

NutrientAverage (%)Top 20% (%)Bottom 20% (%)
Starch31.539.228.3
Neutral Detergent Fiber (NDF)37.831.241.0
Undigestible NDF (UNDF240)10.59.212.1

The Undeniable Economic Impact of High-Quality Corn Silage 

The economic benefits of high-quality corn silage are significant and cannot be understated. Using statistics from the 2023 crop year, it becomes clear how substantial the advantages may be. An investigation of more than 1,800 ensiled corn silage samples revealed that the top 20% of silages, as measured by net energy of lactation (NEL), outperformed the lowest 20% in crucial nutritional measures. This enhanced nutritional profile results in immediate economic benefits for dairy farmers, providing a strong return on investment.

Economically, the difference in ration costs between the top and bottom 20% of corn silage samples is significant. Top-quality silages provide nearly 12% more forage in the diet, decreasing the requirement for additional grains like maize—this decrease in supplementary feed results in a cost difference of 24 cents per head per day. Almost a 150-cow dairy corresponds to an annual reduction in concentrate expenses of nearly $76,000.

Furthermore, even if a dairy farm merely buys supplementary protein and minerals, the opportunity cost of feeding high-quality silage rather than selling excess corn adds up to more than $35,000 per year. These numbers highlight the considerable economic benefits of concentrating on growing and using high-quality corn silage in a dairy farm.

High-quality corn silage is a key factor in improving milk output and reducing feed costs, thereby boosting the dairy farm’s profitability. Investing in superior fermentation profiles, increased starch availability, and outstanding fiber digestibility pays off handsomely, demonstrating that concentrating on corn silage is a promising strategy for enhancing your farm’s potential.

The Tangible Benefits of Top-Tier Corn Silage: Nutrient Excellence and Economic Gains

CriteriaTop 20% Corn SilageBottom 20% Corn Silage
Nutrient QualityHigh starch, low NDF, better fermentation profileLow starch, high NDF, poorer fermentation profile
Corn SupplementationNone required2.22 kg additional grain corn
Forage Utilization (DM)12% more forage, 3.4 kg additional DM from forageLess forage, lower feeding level of on-farm silage
Diet Supplementation CostLower concentrate cost$1.40 increase per head per day
Annual Economic Impact (150-cow dairy)Opportunity cost of selling additional corn: $35,000Increased concentrate costs: $76,000

Significant disparities in nutritional quality, fermentation profiles, and economic effects appear when comparing the top 20% and bottom 20% of corn silage samples. The top 20% of silages had much greater starch contents, about 11 percentage points more. This is critical for increasing propionate formation in the rumen, which is a necessary volatile fatty acid for milk production. Furthermore, these top-tier silages contain roughly ten percentage points less NDF (Neutral Detergent Fiber) and about three percentage points higher UNDF240 (Undigestible NDF after 240 hours), resulting in higher dry matter intake potential.

Regarding fermentation profiles, the top 20% of corn silages have a better composition, with more lactic acid and less acetic acid. This effective lactic acid generation leads to faster fermentation, which reduces dry matter loss of degradable carbohydrates. In contrast, high acetic acid levels in poorly fermenting silages suggest slower fermentation and more significant losses. Furthermore, the top 20% of samples had lower ash levels, indicating less soil contamination and, therefore, fewer soil-borne yeasts and clostridial organisms, which may have a detrimental influence on fermentation and aerobic stability.

The economic consequences of these inequalities are significant. With increased nutritional quality and better fermentation in the top 20% of silages, diets may contain approximately 12% more forage, equivalent to an extra 3.4 kg of dry matter from forage. This change decreases the additional grain maize required to maintain the same level of milk output by 2.22 kg, resulting in considerable cost savings. The economic difference between the two scenarios is about 24 cents per head per day, with concentrate costs varying by $1.40 per day. For a dairy with 150 cows, this corresponds to an annual savings of more than $76,000 in concentrate expenses alone. Even for farms that produce corn, the opportunity cost of not feeding lower-quality silage might result in an extra $35,000 in potential revenues from selling surplus maize.

Maximizing Dairy Efficiency Through Superior Corn Silage: Economic and Nutritional Advantages 

Incorporating high-quality corn silage into dairy diets directly impacts the formulation because it allows for a greater forage inclusion rate, which optimizes forage use. Top-tier corn silage has higher starch and fiber digestibility, so diets may be tailored to maximize forage intake—up to 12% more than lower-quality silage. This enhanced forage inclusion promotes rumen health and minimizes the need for supplementary grains and concentrates. At the same time, high-energy corn silage satisfies nutritional needs.

Practically, using high-quality corn silage minimizes the need for more grain corn. For example, to fulfill the energy needed to produce 40 kg of milk, a diet rich in quality corn silage requires much less grain supplementation. This reduction in grain inclusion frees up room in the diet for additional on-farm silage, improving overall diet quality while lowering expenses. In contrast, lower-quality silage demands more good grain and concentrate supplementation to compensate for nutritional deficiencies, considerably raising feed costs.

Economically, the effect is significant. Superior silage may reduce concentrate costs by about $1.40 per cow per day, demonstrating how concentrating on high-quality silage production can result in substantial financial savings. These savings add up over a year, showing the importance of fodder quality in a dairy farm’s profitability and sustainability.

The Profound Economic Disparities: High-Quality vs. Low-Quality Corn Silage

Economically, there are huge differences between high-quality and low-quality corn silage, which may significantly influence a dairy operation’s profitability. Using the data and comparing situations, we can observe that high-quality corn silage (top 20%) provides more forage in the diet—more than 12% more or an extra 3.4 kg of dry matter (DM). This translates immediately into less dependency on bought cereals and supplements.

For example, a diet containing low-quality silage (bottom 20%) requires an extra 2.22 kilos of grain corn per cow daily to attain comparable rumen-available starch levels. This increased demand for supplements raises feed prices while taking dietary space that might otherwise be supplied with on-farm-generated silage. This forces dairy managers to buy more protein and digestible fiber sources.

Regarding particular economic data, the difference in ration costs is 24 cents per person daily. However, looking at concentrated expenditures reveals more about the financial burden: the cost difference is a staggering $1.40 per person daily. When applied to a 150-cow dairy, the yearly concentration cost disparity exceeds $76,000. Even if the dairy farm plants corn for feed, the opportunity cost of potential earnings from selling the extra grain—assuming high-quality silage is used—is more than $35,000 annually.

The economic conclusions indicate immediate feed cost reductions and potential long-term financial benefits from improved milk production efficiency. As a result, the strategic emphasis on producing and using high-quality corn silage leads to significant economic advantages and increased dairy profitability.

Critical Steps for Harvesting High-Quality Corn Silage: Monitoring Dry Matter, Selecting Inoculants, and Optimizing Cutting Practices

Monitor dry matter (DM) concentration to guarantee high-quality corn silage. The optimal dry matter (DM) ranges from 32% to 38% for silage kept in bunkers and bags and up to 40% for tower silos. Proper moisture testing of the whole plant is required before cutting to meet these standards. Accurately measuring DM helps to ensure an appropriate fermentation.

Next, choosing the proper inoculant is critical for encouraging successful fermentation. To decrease DM loss of soluble carbohydrates, use inoculants with homofermentative bacteria strains, which create lactic acid quickly. Inoculants containing heterofermentative bacteria strains that generate acetic and lactic acids are recommended to improve aerobic stability and lower silage heating during feed out. Select a proven inoculant that meets your company’s unique demands.

Determine the cutting height depending on your silage inventory needs. A standard cut height of 6 to 9 inches is appropriate if all of the grown silage corn is required. For situations needing less silage, greater chopping—up to 24 inches—can boost fiber digestibility and starch content, enhancing overall quality. This method reduces the amount of silage required while increasing nutritional value.

Another important consideration is the cut length. Generally, a chop length of 10 to 22 millimeters is ideal. This range promotes proper digestion and assimilation into the forage diet. Working with a nutritionist is critical for fine-tuning chop length, which depends on total silage volume, chop length of other forages, and particular production goals. Check kernel processing regularly to ensure that there are no whole or half kernels, with a goal of at most two per liter of silage.

The Art of Preservation: Mastering Packing and Covering for Optimal Silage Quality

Proper silage packing and covering are crucial for attaining optimum fermentation and reducing spoiling. Packing silage appropriately guarantees the anaerobic conditions required for the ensiling process. This requires employing enough tractor weight to compress the silage to the necessary density. A general rule of thumb is 400 kilos of packing weight for each tonne of silage ensiled each hour. The idea is to have layers no deeper than 6 inches, allowing for a progressive wedge design. This approach guarantees that oxygen is removed, resulting in good fermentation. Inadequate packing may create oxygen pockets, promoting the development of spoilage organisms like molds and yeasts.

The silage pile must also be well covered. An oxygen barrier followed by an extra plastic layer may minimize oxygen intrusion. The lid is sealed with split tires that contact each other, and sandbags are placed around the perimeter to guarantee minimum air penetration. These strategies reduce aerobic deterioration at the surface and margins of the silage, conserving its quality until it is suitable for use. Producers may pay close attention to these elements to guarantee that their corn silage retains good nutritional quality, increasing milk output and profitability.

The Bottom Line

High-quality corn silage is more than excellent farming; it’s a sound financial decision that may make or break a dairy enterprise. Top-tier corn silage improves milk output while lowering expenses and increasing total profitability. By producing quality corn silage, dairy farmers may enhance feed consumption, minimize the need for additional grains, and improve herd health. Following optimum practices from planting to storage improves dry matter intake, rumen function, and milk production. This harvest season, focus quality over quantity to ensure a profitable year and maximum income. Your herd and bottom line will thank you.

Key Takeaways:

  • High-quality corn silage significantly boosts milk production and components by ensuring optimal starch availability, fiber digestibility, and fermentation profiles.
  • Poor-quality corn silage can lead to financial losses and difficulties in meeting production goals due to inferior nutrient profiles and fermentation inefficiencies.
  • A dataset analysis of over 1,800 corn silage samples from the 2023 crop year highlights the substantial differences in nutritional content and economic impact between top-tier and lower-tier silages.
  • The top 20% of corn silage samples exhibit higher starch levels, better fiber digestibility, and superior lactic acid fermentation, contributing to enhanced dry matter intake and milk production.
  • Economic benefits of high-quality corn silage include reduced need for supplemental feed, leading to significant cost savings in concentrate usage.
  • To achieve high-quality silage, crucial steps include monitoring dry matter content, using research-proven inoculants, optimizing cutting height and chop length, and ensuring adequate packing and covering.
  • Attention to detail in the harvest and preservation process sets the foundation for dairy efficiency and profitability in the following year.

Summary:

High-quality corn silage is crucial for dairy farms as it enhances milk output and profitability by increasing nutrient availability and reducing feed expenditures. A 2023 dataset of over 1,800 samples revealed that high-quality silage contains about 11% more starch, leading to increased propionate production and higher dry matter intake. Properly managed corn silage improves nutritional availability, fiber digestibility, and starch levels, promoting cow health and milk output. This minimizes the demand for additional feeds, cutting total feed expenditures and leading to a more economically and sustainably run dairy farm. The top 20% of silages outperform the lowest 20% in crucial nutritional measures. High-quality corn silage is also essential in dairy diets, allowing for greater forage inclusion rate, optimizing forage use, and promoting rumen health. Harvesting high-quality corn silage requires careful monitoring of dry matter concentration, selecting the right inoculant, and optimizing cutting practices.

Learn more:

Join the Revolution!

Bullvine Daily is your essential e-zine for staying ahead in the dairy industry. With over 30,000 subscribers, we bring you the week’s top news, helping you manage tasks efficiently. Stay informed about milk production, tech adoption, and more, so you can concentrate on your dairy operations. 

NewsSubscribe
First
Last
Consent

Combating Bovine Respiratory Disease (BRD): Insights and Strategies for Healthier Calves and Sustainable Dairy Farming

Find practical tips to lower bovine respiratory disease in preweaned calves. Learn from the BRD 10K study on California dairies. Ready to boost calf health?

Bovine respiratory disease (BRD) is a difficult barrier for pre-weaned dairy calves, causing severe health problems and incurring significant economic costs on dairy farms. The entire cost of BRD, including direct and indirect charges, may vary between $150 and $300 per calf affected by the illness. Detailed research published in the Journal of Dairy Science digs into the complex elements contributing to BRD. It provides concrete measures for dairy producers to prevent this hazard. Understanding the causes of BRD, a leading cause of death in dairy heifers, is crucial for financial and ethical reasons. This study highlights the environmental, dietary, and managerial aspects influencing BRD, providing farmers with research-backed recommendations for raising healthier, more robust herds. This understanding is critical for improving calf health and the overall sustainability of dairy production.

Understanding the epidemiology of bovine respiratory disease (BRD) in pre-weaned calves is critical for dairy farmersaiming to enhance the health and productivity of their herds. The BRD 10K study provides valuable insights into the prevalence, incidence, and risk factors associated with BRD. Below is a table summarizing some of the key findings from this comprehensive study. 

DairyCalves BornBRD CasesIncidence Rate (cases per calf-month at risk)
Dairy 125005750.18
Dairy 232006400.16
Dairy 318003950.17
Dairy 47001600.19
Dairy 512002500.17
Dairy 615453550.18

Meticulous Dairy Selection: Ensuring Robust and Reliable Data 

The selection of dairies for this research was crucial, emphasizing management techniques, location, size, and willingness to participate. Six farms in California’s Central Valley were selected, with milking cow populations ranging from 700 to 3,200. These dairies offered a wide range of data from various sizes of activities. The dedication of each dairy to research procedures guaranteed that data was collected consistently and reliably.

Over a year, 11,945 calves were followed from birth to weaning, allowing us to capture seasonal fluctuations in BRD incidence. Treatment records and surveys by qualified people were critical in monitoring BRD cases and identifying related management practices. Seasonal visits enabled extensive data collection, emphasizing the seasonal influence on BRD incidence. This thorough method provided helpful information for enhancing calf health and reducing illness risks.

Understanding the True Burden: Prevalence and Incidence of BRD in Preweaned Calves 

Key FindingValue95% Confidence Interval (CI)
Overall BRD Study Period Prevalence22.8%N/A
Mean BRD Incidence Density Rate (per calf-month at risk)0.17 BRD cases0.16–1.74
Summer Season Hazard Ratio1.151.01 to 1.32
Spring Season Hazard Ratio1.261.11 to 1.44
Risk Reduction from Feeding Milk ReplacerSignificantSee study
Risk Increase from Housing in Wooden Hutches with Metal RoofsSignificantSee study

The research discovered that 22.8% of pre-weaned calves had BRD, significantly affecting herds. This number is critical for determining the disease’s prevalence. The average BRD incidence density rate was 0.17 cases per calf-month at risk, with a 95% confidence range ranging from 0.16 to 1.74. These findings illustrate the need for good management strategies to control BRD in dairy calves. Given that roughly a quarter of the calves in the research were impacted, BRD presents a severe clinical and economic problem to dairy producers. Implementing effective health monitoring and intervention measures may lower the incidence of BRD and enhance herd health. The variety in BRD cases, which is impacted by seasons, weather, and farm operations, highlights the significance of tailoring remedies to each dairy farm. Understanding these subtleties may result in more effective illness management techniques.

Strategic Measures for Reducing BRD in Preweaned Calves: Best Practices for Dairy Farmers 

Effective management practices are crucial in reducing BRD in pre-weaned dairy calves. This study identified several key strategies that are beneficial across various dairies. 

  • Firstly, feeding protocols are vital. Calves-fed waste or saleable milk had a much lower BRD risk than those given milk replacers. Additionally, providing more than 3.8 liters of milk daily to calves under 21 days old promoted a healthier start.
  • Bedding management also proved significant. Frequently changing the bedding in maternity pens reduced BRD risk. This simple practice minimizes calves’ exposure to harmful pathogens in soiled bedding, fostering a cleaner environment.
  • Vaccination protocols were crucial, too. Administering modified live or killed BRD vaccines to dams before calving significantly lowered the likelihood of their calves developing BRD. This proactive approach ensures calves receive antibodies through colostrum shortly after birth, offering early protection. 

By implementing these targeted feeding strategies, diligent bedding maintenance, and strategic vaccination schedules, dairies can effectively reduce BRD and promote the overall health of their pre-weaned calves. This combination of practices offers a comprehensive approach to managing factors contributing to BRD, safeguarding the productivity and longevity of dairy herds.

Identifying and Mitigating Key Risk Factors Influencing BRD Incidence in Preweaned Calves 

Several main risk factors increase the prevalence of bovine respiratory disease (BRD) in pre-weaned calves, which dairy producers should be aware of. Housing conditions are critical; calves in wooden hutches with metal roofs are more vulnerable than those in all-wood hutches, emphasizing the necessity for optimal shelter construction.

Additionally, twin births raise the chance of BRD. Twin calves are more likely to experience stress and have a lower immune system. These calves need further care and monitoring.

Environmental dust levels can have a significant impact. Dust that occurs “regularly” in the calf-raising region has been linked to an increased risk of BRD. Maintaining a clean, dust-free atmosphere is critical.

Seasonal differences can influence BRD occurrence. Summer and spring provide more significant hazards than winter, implying that warmer weather increases calves’ susceptibility to respiratory infections. Dairy producers should use season-specific measures to control and minimize BRD risk during peak incidence times.

Seasonal Patterns and Their Influence on BRD Incidence in Preweaned Calves 

SeasonBRD Incidence Rate (Hazard Ratio)95% Confidence Interval (CI)
Summer1.151.01 to 1.32
Spring1.261.11 to 1.44
Winter1.00Reference

The study’s results on seasonal effect show significant connections between time of year and BRD incidence in pre-weaned calves. Spring and summer provide a higher risk than winter, with hazard ratios of 1.26 and 1.15, respectively.

Spring’s shifting temperatures and increasing humidity might produce settings favorable to respiratory infections, reducing calf immunity. Furthermore, increased calving during spring results in more immature, fragile calves, increasing the danger of BRD epidemics.

Summer brings increased temperatures and the possibility of dust, which may irritate the respiratory system and make calves more vulnerable to illness. Heat stress during this season may further weaken calves, making it difficult for them to fight respiratory infections.

In comparison, winter often provides a more stable atmosphere. The colder temperatures may not have the same negative impact as those in spring and summer. Recognizing these trends enables tailored therapy depending on seasonal obstacles, lowering BRD risks throughout the year.

Proactive Strategies for Dairy Farmers to Combat BRD in Preweaned Calves 

Bovine respiratory disease (BRD) is a significant threat to pre-weaned calves. Research provides critical steps for dairy farmers to tackle this issue: 

  • Housing Improvements: To reduce BRD risk, use all-wood hutches instead of wooden cabinets with metal roofs. Ensure proper ventilation to minimize dust, linked to a higher incidence of BRD. 
  • Feeding Practices: Feed calves more than 3.8 liters of milk daily, especially those under 21 days old, to lower BRD risk. Milk replacers should be preferred over waste or saleable milk for better calf health. 
  • Maternity Pen Management: Frequently change maternity pen bedding to create clean and dry conditions, reducing exposure to pathogens and lowering BRD transmission.
  • Vaccination Protocols: Administer modified live or killed BRD vaccines to dams before calving to boost calf immunity via colostrum, protecting against respiratory infections
  • Addressing Twin Births: Extra care is crucial for twins, who are at higher risk for BRD. Ensure they get sufficient nutrition and monitor them closely for respiratory issues.
  • Seasonal Considerations: BRD risk is higher in spring and summer. To prevent infections, enhance feeding protocols, and increase monitoring during these seasons. 

By adopting these strategies, dairy farmers can significantly reduce BRD risk, ensuring healthier calves.

The Bottom Line

Our study of BRD in pre-weaned dairy calves provides essential insights for minimizing its prevalence. By examining management techniques and risk variables, we offer a clear path for California dairy producers to improve calf health and production. Key results from the BRD 10K trial include:

  • The benefits of utilizing milk replacers.
  • Keeping maternity pens clean.
  • Administering dam vaccines on time.

Improving housing by eliminating wooden hutches with metal roofs and minimizing dust is critical. Seasonal patterns reveal that BRD instances are more significant in the spring and summer, emphasizing the need for preventive care.

These approaches have the potential to drastically decrease the incidence of BRD while also enhancing calf and herd health. This not only improves animal welfare but also the economic health of dairies. Recognizing and treating these risk factors is critical. The dairy sector must promote these best practices to ensure a healthier and more resilient future for our calves and farms.

Key Takeaways:

  • High Prevalence and Incidence: The study found an overall BRD prevalence of 22.8% across the dairies, with a mean BRD incidence rate of 0.17 cases per calf-month.
  • Effective Management Practices: Key strategies to reduce BRD risk include feeding practices, proper maternity pen management, and timely vaccination of dams.
  • Environmental Risk Factors: Housing conditions and environmental factors, such as dust and temperature, were identified as significant contributors to BRD risk.
  • Seasonal Influences: The study underscores the increased risk during spring and summer, necessitating heightened vigilance during these seasons.

Summary:

Bovine respiratory disease (BRD) remains a significant issue for dairy producers, especially in pre-weaned calves. This extensive research, done across six varied dairies in California’s Central Valley, aimed to uncover the epidemiology of BRD and discover appropriate management techniques to reduce its risk. The research gives practical insights into minimizing BRD prevalence and incidence by meticulously following over 12,000 calves and conducting extensive assessments of calf care techniques. The results indicated a 22.8% prevalence of BRD among the examined calves, with various management techniques as significant predictors of disease risk. Essential strategies that lowered BRD risk included feeding only discarded or saleable milk or using a milk replacer. Calves under 21 days old are fed more than 3.8 liters of milk daily. The maternity pen bedding is often changed.  They are giving modified live or dead BRD vaccinations to dams before calving. Housing calves in inadequate structures and preserving a dust-free environment are critical in avoiding BRD,” said one researcher, emphasizing the need for careful calf housing arrangements.
Furthermore, the research found a seasonal effect on BRD risk, with spring and summer showing more excellent rates than winter. This highlights the need for season-specific techniques in BRD control. Dairy producers today have a robust set of data-driven approaches to tackle BRD, resulting in healthier herds and more sustainable dairy businesses.

Learn more:

Send this to a friend