Archive for trade war

Dairy Markets Panic While Smart Farmers Cash In: Why 94% of Exports Remain Unaffected by Tariff Drama.

Dairy markets are in panic mode, but savvy farmers smell opportunity, so 94% of exports dodge tariffs while traders overreact. Your 60-day action plan is inside.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Recent tariff announcements have sent dairy markets into a tailspin, but the actual impact on U.S. dairy exports is limited to just 6% for China and 10% for Canada. This disconnect between market reaction and economic reality creates opportunities for strategic dairy producers. Regional differences in feed costs and projected margins highlight the importance of location-specific strategies. A 60-day action plan leveraging natural hedges and split strategies can help producers navigate the volatility. Understanding market psychology and inventory signals is crucial for making informed decisions. With only 4% of cheese exports affected, the current market panic may represent a buying opportunity for forward-thinking farmers.

KEY TAKEAWAYS:

  • Despite severe market reactions, new tariffs affect only 6% of U.S. dairy exports to China and 10% to Canada.
  • Regional economics matter: Wisconsin’s projected 2025 margin ($11.34/cwt) significantly outperforms California’s ($8.69/cwt) due to lower feed costs.
  • A 60-day action plan includes 70% feed coverage through June, dropping to 40% later while protecting nearby milk revenue and maintaining flexibility for potential late-year recovery.
  • Market psychology drives prices more than actual trade impacts, creating potential opportunities for contrarian operators.
  • NFDM stocks up 41% year-over-year, signaling broader inventory challenges beyond tariff concerns.

The dairy markets took a wild ride this week after Tuesday’s tariff announcements, but savvy producers are spotting opportunities where others see chaos. While headlines scream trade war, the numbers tell a different story—one in which only 6% of U.S. dairy exports to China and 10% to Canada are actually affected by these new tariffs. This massive disconnect between market fear and economic reality creates the perfect opportunity for forward-thinking farmers to position themselves ahead of the inevitable correction.

TRADERS OVERREACT WHILE DAIRY FARMERS KEEP THEIR COOL

Tuesday, March 4, 2025, wasn’t just another day at the office—it was when the U.S. fired the opening salvo in what might become a severe trade skirmish. The United States slapped a hefty 25% tariff on Canadian and Mexican imports while adding another 10% to everything from China. With Mexico’s response coming this Sunday, China and Canada immediately hit back with targeted counter-tariffs on select U.S. dairy products.

Here’s what’s got everyone spooked: this trade confrontation looks broader than the 2018 disputes, hitting North America and Asia simultaneously. But dig beneath the headlines, and you’ll find something shocking—these tariffs directly impact only a tiny slice of America’s dairy export volume. For cheese specifically, just 4% of exports face these new barriers.

“The current additional tariffs on U.S. products don’t justify the declines that we saw in CME spot cheese and butter this week,” notes the latest ProfitView analysis. The report points to domestic demand concerns and escalation fears driving the overreaction. CME spot blocks fell hard this week, with barrels dropping by less—a market psychology lesson playing out in real-time.

REGIONAL ADVANTAGE: WHY SOME DAIRY STATES WILL THRIVE WHILE OTHERS STRUGGLE

Not all dairy regions feel trade disruptions equally. The StoneX data reveals a fascinating geographic divide that innovative producers are already exploiting. Wisconsin’s projected 2025 margin of $11.34 per hundredweight towers over California’s vulnerable $8.69—a $2.65 difference that could mean survival versus struggle during market turbulence.

StateMilk Price (USD/cwt)Feed Cost (USD/cwt)Margin (USD/cwt)
Wisconsin$20.73$9.39$11.34
New York$21.91$10.41$11.50
Idaho$20.99$10.55$10.44
Texas$21.73$11.49$10.24
Arizona$21.15$11.44$9.71
California$20.05$11.36$8.69

Source: USDA, CME, StoneX Calculations, Estimates and Forecasts

This regional advantage isn’t random—it’s structural. Wisconsin’s feed cost advantage ($9.39 vs. California’s $11.36 per hundredweight) provides crucial cushioning against milk price volatility. This $1.97 feed cost differential becomes even more decisive during trade disruptions, representing a built-in competitive advantage regardless of milk price movements.

Texas faces similar challenges, with the highest feed costs among major dairy states at .49, explaining their tighter expected margins despite relatively high projected milk prices of .73. These regional variations matter because they dictate how aggressively different producers approach risk management in the current environment.

YOUR 60-DAY ACTION PLAN: TURNING MARKET PANIC INTO PROFIT

Market disruptions separate reactive farmers from strategic business managers. While most producers scramble to understand what happened, forward-thinking operators are already executing targeted margin protection strategies that exploit the current price overreaction.

First, recognize that the natural hedge is working in your favor. The same market forces hammering milk prices while simultaneously pushing feed costs lower. Corn futures for April 2025 have plummeted to $4.44 per bushel, down $0.42 in just one week and $0.51 from last month. Soybean meal shows similar weakness at $290 per ton, down $8.25 week-over-week and $18.15 month-over-month. This automatic counterbalance helps stabilize margins even as milk prices fall.

US Dairy Margin Projections 2025 (USD/cwt)
MonthApr-25Jun-25Aug-25Oct-25Dec-25
US Margin10.839.5810.3311.2111.40
Class III17.5917.4618.0918.3618.17
Corn ($/bu)4.444.554.504.434.47
SBM ($/ton)290297303306310

Source: USDA, CME, StoneX Calculations, Estimates and Forecasts.

The futures curves tell a fascinating recovery story after June’s low point. Innovative operators are implementing split hedge strategies that match these market dynamics. The data suggests 70% feed coverage through June, dropping to 40% for later months to capture potential harvest-time price breaks. For milk, protect revenue more heavily in nearby months while maintaining flexibility to grab potential late-year price recovery.

With Mexico’s retaliatory announcement expected, Sunday, Tuesday, and Wednesday represent your window to execute these strategies before the next wave of market volatility hits. Class III milk futures for April 2025 are trading at $17.59 per hundredweight, down $0.86 from last week. While these levels reflect market panic, they may represent reasonable downside protection given the uncertain trade environment.

WHY MARKETS OVERREACT: THE PSYCHOLOGY BEHIND THE PANIC

The current market behavior provides a textbook example of why commodity markets often overreact to geopolitical developments. This phenomenon isn’t random—it’s a documented pattern driven by specific psychological biases that create repeated opportunities for contrarian operators.

Traders display classic availability bias, giving disproportionate weight to dramatic, headline-grabbing events. The announcement of tariffs triggers immediate selling regardless of actual economic impact. Herd behavior amplifies initial moves as traders follow each other rather than independently analyzing fundamental impacts. Finally, risk asymmetry pushes traders to exit positions first and ask questions later since the penalty for being wrong about downside risk typically exceeds the opportunity cost of missing upside potential.

The disconnect between market reaction and actual trade impact couldn’t be more apparent. CME spot blocks fell hard this week despite only 4% of cheese exports affected by these new tariffs. This perfectly illustrates how markets price fear rather than facts during geopolitical events.

Even more interesting is what’s happening with butter. Canada is the largest destination for U.S. butter exports, but this week’s tariffs only impact a small fraction of that volume. They could be extended to all butter volume three weeks from now, but the current weakness in the spot market is more likely due to ample cream supplies than trade concerns.

INVENTORY SIGNALS: WHAT 41% HIGHER NFDM STOCKS TELL US ABOUT THE MARKET

The powder market tells a different story about what’s driving price movements. U.S. NFDM and dry whey prices were lower this week, while global prices were higher. After running above other major exporters, U.S. powder prices are now starting to converge—a necessary correction regardless of trade tensions.

January’s report showed NFDM stocks were up a staggering 41% year-over-year, creating inventory pressure that was building long before any tariff talk. This inventory situation, combined with lower-than-forecast cheese and butter production in January, suggests processors were already adjusting production mix to address domestic market realities.

The powder inventory situation creates both challenges and opportunities. The convergence of U.S. powder prices with global values could improve export competitiveness, potentially offsetting some tariff impacts if the price adjustment continues. For processors, this signals an urgent need to rebalance product mix away from powder production as spring flush approaches.

THE BOTTOM LINE: ARE YOU A MARKET FOLLOWER OR A MARKET LEADER?

The disconnect between tariff impacts and market reaction creates danger and opportunity for dairy producers. While headlines scream trade war, the economic reality is far more nuanced: only 6% of exports to China and 10% to Canada currently face tariffs. Competent operators recognize this overreaction for what it is—a potential buying opportunity masked as a crisis.

Regional economics matter more than ever during market disruptions. Wisconsin’s $2.65 margin advantage over California ($11.34 vs. $8.69) highlights how geographic positioning creates natural resilience for some and vulnerability for others. Understanding your specific regional economics should drive your risk management approach.

For forward-thinking producers, today’s challenge isn’t about surviving a trade war but exploiting market inefficiencies while others panic. Are you following the herd or positioning yourself ahead of the inevitable correction when markets recognize that 94% of exports remain unaffected? Your answer to that question might determine whether 2025 is your most profitable or challenging year.

With Mexico’s announcement looming Sunday and spring flush approaching, the next 60 days will separate reactive operators from strategic managers. The choice isn’t whether to respond but how to transform market psychology from threat to opportunity while others try to understand what hit them.

LEARN MORE:

Join the Revolution!

Join over 30,000 successful dairy professionals who rely on Bullvine Daily for their competitive edge. Delivered directly to your inbox each week, our exclusive industry insights help you make smarter decisions while saving precious hours every week. Never miss critical updates on milk production trends, breakthrough technologies, and profit-boosting strategies that top producers are already implementing. Subscribe now to transform your dairy operation’s efficiency and profitability—your future success is just one click away.

NewsSubscribe
First
Last
Consent

China Slaps 10% Tariff on US Dairy: Exporters Face New Market Challenges as Trade War Heats Up.

China will impose a 10% tariff on US dairy products starting March 10 as the trade war intensifies, but it will offer a temporary exemption for shipments already en route. American dairy farmers face immediate market challenges as their export competitiveness suffers in the crucial Chinese market. At the same time, feed crop tariffs could create complex ripple effects through the dairy supply chain.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: China’s Customs Tariff Commission has announced a 10% additional tariff on US dairy products effective March 10, creating significant challenges for American dairy exporters. The measures, part of broader agricultural retaliation against recent US tariff increases, include a critical exemption for shipments already in transit before the implementation date. Beyond agriculture, China has also placed defense companies on its unreliable entity list, including Lockheed Martin divisions, demonstrating a multi-pronged response to US trade actions that threaten hard-won market access for American dairy producers.

KEY TAKEAWAYS:

  • China will implement a 10% additional tariff on US dairy products beginning March 10, 2025
  • Shipments already en route before March 10 and arriving by April 12 are exempt from the new tariffs
  • The new tariffs will be added to existing rates rather than replacing them
  • Feed ingredients, including corn and soybeans, also face tariffs, potentially affecting dairy input costs
  • China has also restricted the activities of 10 US defense companies in a parallel non-agricultural action
  • The Chinese Commerce Ministry cited damage to “the fundamental basis of economic and trade cooperation” in its announcement.
China tariffs, US dairy exports, trade war, agricultural retaliation, dairy industry impact

In a direct response to President Trump’s tariff increases, China’s Customs Tariff Commission announced Tuesday it would implement a 10% additional levy on American dairy products beginning March 10, creating immediate challenges for US dairy exporters attempting to maintain their foothold in this crucial Asian market. The announcement explicitly identifies dairy among several agricultural categories facing new trade barriers, with the Commerce Ministry confirming these measures come in retaliation for the US raising tariffs on Chinese imports to 20% on March 4.

China’s Targeted Agricultural Tariffs Take Aim at US Farmers

China’s Commerce Ministry officially declared that American chicken, wheat, corn, and cotton imports will face an additional 15% tariff. Sorghum, soybeans, pork, beef, seafood, fruits, vegetables, and dairy products will face a 10% increase. These tariffs will be added to existing rates rather than replaced, potentially creating cumulative duties that significantly disadvantage US products compared to international competitors.

The announcement includes one critical provision that may provide temporary relief: shipments already en route won’t face the additional duties. Specifically, “For imports that have been shipped from the port of origin before March 10, 2025, and are imported into China between March 10 and April 12, the additional tariffs imposed as specified by this announcement shall not be levied,” according to the Customs Tariff Commission’s official statement.

Immediate Market Implications for Dairy Exporters

The timing of these tariffs creates immediate complications for dairy processors and cooperatives with shipments already in transit or contracts recently signed. While the transit exemption provides some breathing room, dairy exporters still face difficult decisions about pricing strategies and customer communications for shipments scheduled after the grace period ends in mid-April.

China has been a growing destination for US dairy exports in recent years, with particular strength in specialized ingredients, whey products, and cheese. These products now face significant price disadvantages compared to competitors from countries like New Zealand, Australia, and the European Union, which aren’t subject to the same additional tariffs. The pricing disparity creates immediate competitive challenges for US dairy products in a market where price sensitivity remains high and alternative suppliers stand ready to fill any void.

Beyond Agriculture: China Expands Trade Restrictions

In a parallel move, Beijing has added 10 US companies to its “unreliable entity list,” which prohibits these firms from participating in China-related import or export activities and restricts them from making new investments. The targeted companies include defense firms such as Lockheed Missiles Fire Control, Lockheed Martin Aeronautics, and Lockheed Martin Missile System Integration Lab. According to the Commerce Ministry, senior executives from these companies will also face entry bans to China, and their work permits and residency permissions will be revoked.

This multi-pronged approach demonstrates China’s strategic targeting of agricultural communities and defense industries in its response to US tariff actions, continuing a pattern established during previous trade disputes.

Historical Context and Market Trends

The additional tariffs come against a backdrop of declining agricultural exports to China. US agricultural shipments to China fell for the second consecutive year in 2024, continuing a downward trend that began with the initial trade disputes during President Trump’s first term.

Since these disputes began, China has systematically worked to reduce its dependence on US agricultural imports. Beijing has pursued a dual strategy of diversifying its agricultural supply sources while boosting domestic production to achieve greater food security. For dairy, this has meant increased investment in domestic dairy operations while strengthening trade relationships with alternative suppliers like New Zealand, which enjoys preferential access under existing trade agreements.

Potential Feed Cost Implications

For dairy farmers, the impact of these tariffs extends beyond direct export opportunities. The Chinese measures also target key feed ingredients, including corn and soybeans, potentially creating complex ripple effects throughout agricultural supply chains. Should these tariffs significantly reduce US exports of these commodities, domestic prices could face downward pressure, potentially providing some relief on input costs for dairy operations during a period of export challenges.

The Chinese Commerce Ministry characterized the US tariff increases as “undermining the multilateral trading system, exacerbating the burden on American businesses and consumers, and damaging the fundamental basis of economic and trade cooperation between China and the US.” This official position suggests continued friction rather than a quick resolution to the trade dispute.

Industry Response and Strategic Considerations

Industry organizations are already mobilizing to assess the full implications of these new tariffs and advocate for government support measures to offset potential market losses. Previous rounds of agricultural tariffs have typically triggered federal assistance programs, though the specific nature and timing of any potential support remain uncertain at this early stage.

The tariffs arrive at a challenging time for many dairy operations, which are already navigating volatile input costs and evolving consumer preferences. Processors with diversified export portfolios may be better positioned to weather this disruption by redirecting products to alternative markets, though such pivots typically involve price concessions and additional logistical complexities.

These tariffs underscore the importance of individual dairy farmers working closely with their cooperatives or processors to understand how market access changes might affect milk pricing and volume commitments in the coming months. Operations with high debt loads or tight margins may face particular challenges if the tariffs trigger broader milk price adjustments throughout the domestic market.

Conclusion: Navigating Uncertain Trade Waters

The imposition of 10% additional tariffs on US dairy exports to China represents a significant market disruption that will require careful navigation by all segments of the dairy value chain. While the immediate effects will be most directly felt by exporters and processors with active Chinese business, the potential for broader market adjustments means all dairy producers should monitor developments closely and maintain open communication with their milk buyers about potential implications.

As the dairy industry adapts to this latest market challenge, collaboration between producers, processors, and industry organizations will be essential to developing coordinated responses that protect the long-term competitiveness of US dairy in global markets. The resilience demonstrated by the sector during previous trade disruptions suggests the industry has developed valuable experience in navigating such challenges. However, each new round of tariffs brings unique complexities requiring fresh strategic approaches.

LEARN MORE:

Join the Revolution!

Bullvine Daily is your essential e-zine for staying ahead in the dairy industry. With over 30,000 subscribers, we bring you the week’s top news, helping you manage tasks efficiently. Stay informed about milk production, tech adoption, and more, so you can concentrate on your dairy operations.

NewsSubscribe
First
Last
Consent

Trump’s Tariffs: Can History Repeat Without Repeating Mistakes?

Farmers are on edge as President Trump reaffirms 25% tariffs on Canadian dairy. While some see this as a chance to dismantle Canada’s supply management system, others worry about repeating the costly mistakes of past trade wars. Will these tariffs lead to long-term gains or just more short-term pain?

Summary

President Trump’s confirmation of 25% tariffs on Canadian dairy imports, set to take effect March 4, 2025, has ignited fierce debate within the U.S. agricultural sector. While the administration frames this move as a strategic push to break Canada’s supply management system, many farmers remain skeptical, recalling the painful aftermath of similar tariffs in 2018. That trade war resulted in a $28 billion government bailout and accelerated the decline of small dairy operations. This time, stakeholders are demanding more than just temporary measures, calling for structural reforms to address labor shortages, subsidy inequities, and global competition. As the deadline approaches, the dairy industry finds itself at a crossroads, weighing the potential for long-term market access against the risks of immediate economic disruption and retaliatory measures from Canada and Mexico. The outcome could reshape North American dairy trade for decades to come.

Key Takeaways

  • President Trump has renewed criticism of Canada’s dairy supply management system, calling it unfair to U.S. farmers and threatening tariffs.
  • The U.S. imposed 25% tariffs on most Canadian imports on February 4, 2025, with Canada retaliating with tariffs on $30 billion of U.S. goods.
  • Trump is pushing to renegotiate USMCA in 2026, potentially threatening Canada’s dairy protections.
  • Canada’s supply management system imposes high tariffs (up to 298%) on imported dairy products to protect domestic farmers.
  • The dairy dispute impacts $1.2 billion in annual trade between the U.S. and Canada.
  • Canadian farmers fear losing the stability provided by supply management, while U.S. farmers seek increased market access.
  • Canada passed Bill C-282 to protect supply management from trade concessions, but it faces challenges under U.S. pressure.
  • Some argue Canada needs to reform its dairy system to remain competitive, while others say eliminating it would devastate Canadian farmers.
  • The dispute has reignited debate over food sovereignty vs. free trade principles in agriculture.

As President Trump reaffirms 25% tariffs on Canadian dairy effective March 4, farmers face déjà vu. While the administration touts this as a decisive blow against Canada’s protectionist supply management system, critics warn of repeating 2018’s costly trade war. This $28 billion bailout debacle failed to secure long-term gains. This time, stakeholders demand structural reforms, not just short-term salvos.

Lessons From 2018: Bailouts and Broken Promises

The $28 Billion Hole

Trump’s 2018 tariffs triggered retaliatory measures that crushed U.S. agricultural exports, particularly soybeans, which plummeted from $19.5 billion in 2017 to $9 billion by 2018. To stem the bleeding, the USDA funneled $23 billion through its Commodity Credit Corporation, with soybean growers alone receiving $7.3 billion. Despite this, farm bankruptcies rose 20% in 2019, and small dairy operations collapsed at twice the national average.

Wisconsin dairy farmer Jake Mueller reflects:

“We got checks, sure—but they were Band-Aids on bullet wounds. Most neighbors sold their herds or retired. The bailouts just delayed the inevitable.”

Subsidy Inequities Exposed

While the 2018 bailouts stabilized prices, they disproportionately benefited megafarms. USDA data shows 42% of dairy revenue now comes from government support, with 70% of subsidies flowing to operations with 500+ cows. This accelerated the 40% decline of small dairies since 2000, as family farms lacked the scale to leverage robotic milking systems or methane digesters.

Proposed Fix:

  • Subsidy Caps: Limit payments to farms with <200 cows to prevent corporate consolidation.
  • Trade War Insurance: USDA-backed revenue guarantees for small producers during disruptions.

Canada’s Supply Management vs. U.S. Efficiency

The Quota Conundrum

Canada’s supply management system—described by Trade Rep Katherine Tai as “a state-sponsored cartel”—imposes 298% tariffs on dairy imports and forces farmers to discard excess milk. Since 2012, 7 billion liters of Canadian milk (worth $14.9B) have been wasted. Yet Ottawa’s lobby ensures political immunity: dairy farmers contribute 25% of federal campaign funds in rural ridings.

U.S. Competitive Edge

American dairies operate at 10x Canada’s scale, slashing per-unit costs by 34%. However, retaliatory tariffs threaten key inputs:

  • Potash: 30% of U.S. supply comes from Canada; tariffs could raise fertilizer costs by $60/acre.
  • Labor: 16% of dairy workers are undocumented migrants; visa reforms lag despite sector collapse risks.

Idaho Dairy Cooperative CEO warns:

“Without H-2A visa expansion, tariffs will starve us of workers before they squeeze Canada.”

Strategic Opportunities Amid Risks

Short-Term Realities

  • Cheese Exports: 23% of U.S. cheese heads to Canada ($650M/year). Mexico’s threat to tax Wisconsin cheddar could cost $1.5B annually—repeating 2018’s Midwest losses.
  • Inflation: Trump’s 2018 steel tariffs raised appliance prices by 12–30%; dairy inputs (feed, equipment) may follow.

Long-Term Plays

  1. USMCA Renegotiation: Demand Canada triple tariff-free quotas (currently 3% of their market).
  2. Diversification: Target China’s $12B dairy import gap, leveraging USDA’s $2B “Dairy 2030” AI initiative.
  3. Value-Added Shift: Redirect surplus milk to lactose-free/protein products—a $4.8B growth sector.

Political Crosscurrents

Rural Base Solidifies… For Now

68% of dairy farmers back tariffs in Farm Pulse polls, swayed by Canada’s 270% butter duties. Yet skepticism simmers. Iowa GOP Chair:

“We’ll tolerate short-term pain if Trump dismantles supply management—not just postures.”

Democratic Nuance

Even critics concede strategic merit. Senator Jon Tester (D-MT) notes:

“Canada’s system is rigged. But tariffs without immigration reform and subsidy caps? That’s 2018’s playbook—and we saw how that ended.”

The Road Ahead: Structural Reform or Cyclical Bailouts?

  1. March 4 Deadline: Canada could avert tariffs by expanding U.S. access to 5% of its market, creating 12K U.S. jobs.
  2. Labor Fixes: Pair tariffs with H-2A visa expansions to address 16% workforce gaps.
  3. Anti-Consolidation Measures: Tax incentives for small farms adopting robotics/AI.

Conclusion: Beyond the Tariff Bluster

Trump’s tariffs could either catalyze long-overdue reforms or repeat 2018’s cycle of bailouts and consolidation. For farmers, the stakes transcend milk quotas: it’s about proving protectionism can be dismantled without sacrificing rural America’s backbone. As Wisconsin’s StarkD_01 bluntly observes:

“Bailouts just paid for vacations. This time, we need wins—not welfare.”

Learn more

Join the Revolution!

Bullvine Daily is your essential e-zine for staying ahead in the dairy industry. With over 30,000 subscribers, we bring you the week’s top news, helping you manage tasks efficiently. Stay informed about milk production, tech adoption, and more, so you can concentrate on your dairy operations. 

NewsSubscribe
First
Last
Consent

Dairy Showdown: Canadian Quotas vs. American Free Market – Who’s Right?

Blood, milk, and money fuel North America’s dirtiest agricultural showdown. At the 49th parallel, two dairy systems face-off: Canada’s quota-cushioned farmers versus America’s free-market warriors. While they battle over borders and butter, Silicon Valley plots to make cows obsolete. Welcome to dairy’s final frontier.

Picture this: blood, milk, and money: the great North American dairy divide. Picture two dairy farmers squaring off at the 49th parallel. One’s got quota papers clutched like brass knuckles; the other’s flexing export contracts like a loaded gun. Welcome to dairy’s dirtiest fight – where Canadian stability squares off against American ambition, and neither side’s backing down. 

In one corner is Canada’s supply management system, a strict supply management that ensures farmers operate within set production limits, allowing them a sense of security akin to babies sleeping soundly, all while the value of their barns rivals that of mansions in Beverly Hills. On the other hand, America’s free-market fury is where farmers ride commodity markets like bull riders at a rodeo – eight seconds of glory or face-down in the dirt.

This isn’t just about milk – it’s about two nations’ battle for the soul of dairy farming. While Canadian farmers mock their American cousins for dumping milk in ditches, U.S. producers sneer at Canada’s strict supply management from their 5,000-cow mega-parlors. Each side thinks the other’s crazy, and both might be right. 

Strap in for dairy’s ultimate grudge match. There are no participation trophies here – just two systems locked in a fight reshaping North America’s dairy landscape one bankruptcy, merger, and trade war at a time. 

Now, let’s wade into this manure-splattered battlefield…

The Canadian Corner: Playing it Safe or Playing it Scared? 

In the frigid predawn hours across Canada’s dairy heartland, farmers aren’t just milking cows – they’re protecting a system that’s become more valuable than the farms themselves. The Canadian dairy quota system, a complex structure of production controls and price guarantees, has turned a basic milk jug into a multibillion-dollar battleground. 

  • The Golden Handcuffs: Here’s the raw truth: A single dairy cow’s quota now costs upwards of $30,000 in Ontario and Quebec and hit a staggering $58,000 in Alberta last March. For perspective, a 100-cow operation is sitting on a quota worth $3 million before considering a single acre of land or barn. “Rich on paper, poor in the bank,” as Quebec farmers put it, watching their net worth soar while scraping on $2,000 monthly salaries and pouring everything back into the farm.
  • Fighting for Their Children’s Future: The system’s defenders aren’t just protecting profits—they’re guarding their children’s inheritance. Unlike American farmers, who get 73% of producer returns from Uncle Sam, financial stability flows from a system without government subsidies. Guaranteed minimum prices based on production costs and protection from market crashes create a shield that American dairy farmers can only dream about. 
  • Market Control: The Iron Fortress: The production matches domestic demand through iron-clad quotas, while tariffs, which have soared to 298%, keep foreign competition at bay. This predictable income stream enables long-term planning and investment, creating a fortress around Canadian dairy that’s become the envy of farmers worldwide.
  • Paradise Lost: The System’s Dark Side: Yet this golden system has rust under the chrome. Young farmers face a generational genocide – try finding $3 million for quota alone before buying your first cow. The average farmer’s age climbs past 55 while family farms become too valuable to farm. Market rigidity shows its teeth during demand shifts, as COVID-19 exposed to milk dumping. Innovation suffocates under quota constraints, while regional disparities concentrate 74% of farms in Ontario and Quebec. 
  • The Last Stand: Despite these flaws, Canadian dairy farmers view supply management as their last defense against becoming like their American cousins. They watch dairy farms vanish south of the border daily, with Wisconsin losing 75 farms in a single processor’s decision. The math is brutal but clear: Would you rather have a system that guarantees survival with golden handcuffs or face the American-style freedom to fail? 

Supply management isn’t just policy for Canadian dairy farmers – it’s a bulletproof vest in an increasingly hostile agricultural world. While economists cry foul and consumers grumble about prices, farmers see their quota certificates as the only thing standing between them and the dairy graveyard that America has become. As one Quebec farmer said, watching another family farm auction: “We’re not protecting profits – we’re protecting survival.” In the end, that’s why this system, flaws and all, commands such fierce loyalty. It’s not perfect, but it’s keeping Canadian dairy farmers alive while their American counterparts vanish into history. 

Land of the Free, Home of the Brave: Why American Dairy FarmersStand by Their Market-Driven System

Welcome to America’s dairy battleground, where freedom comes with a hefty price tag, and only the strong survive. From California’s sprawling mega-dairies to Wisconsin’s family operations, U.S. dairy farmers aren’t just milking cows – they’re waging war in a system that rewards the bold and buries the timid. 

  • Raw Capitalism in Rubber Boots: The American dairy system is capitalism distilled to its purest form. Federal milk marketing orders may set the rules, but survival demands more than following them. While Canadian farmers count their quota pennies, American producers are building empires. The average U.S. dairy now milks 225 cows—nearly triple its northern neighbors’ modest 85-cow herds. 
  • The American Dream: Dairy Edition: In the land of opportunity, dairy farmers have ambitious dreams. California operations milk more cows than some Canadian provinces have citizens. These mega-dairies aren’t just farms – they’re milk factories, pumping out 15% of their production straight to export markets while their quota-bound Canadian cousins watch from behind their tariff walls.
  • Innovation or Extinction: American dairies don’t just adopt technology—they weaponize it. Robotic milkers, genomic testing, and artificial intelligence aren’t luxuries but survival tools. While Canadian farmers debate whether to invest their quota equity, U.S. producers are already testing tomorrow’s innovations.
  • The Price of Freedom: But this unrestrained capitalism extracts its pound of flesh. Since 2003, half of America’s dairy farms have vanished into memory. Milk prices swing wildly enough to give an accountant vertigo. One month, you’re expanding; the next, you’re calling the auction house. The survivors aren’t just farmers – financial acrobats, environmental compliance experts, and global market strategists rolled into coveralls. 
  • The Darwinian Dance: The numbers tell a brutal story: 1.3% of farms produce over a third of America’s milk. Small farms aren’t just dying – they’re being swallowed whole by operations that measure their herds in thousands. It’s a survival-of-the-fittest scenario in the dairy industry, akin to natural selection as proposed by Darwin.
  • Why They’ll Die on This Hill: Ask an American dairy farmer why they prefer their system to Canada’s “socialist milk scheme,” and you’ll learn about freedom, opportunity, and the American way. They prefer risking everything on their terms rather than allowing external regulation to dictate their milk production limits. 

The U.S. dairy system isn’t just a business model – it’s a battlefield where only the fittest survive. While it has led to the most efficient dairy industry globally, it has also resulted in shattered dreams and closed farms. But for those who make it, the rewards can be empire-sized. As one dairyman said, “In America, we don’t just milk cows – we milk opportunity. Sometimes it kicks back, but that’s the price of freedom.” 

Consumer Perspective: A Tale of Two Dairy Aisles 

In Canada, shoppers face a dairy dilemma: pay through the nose or go lactose-free. With milk costing 50% more than south of the border, Canadians fund a rural welfare program every time they buy a block of cheddar. But hey, at least they know their outrageously priced milk is rBST-free, and their farmers aren’t on food stamps

Meanwhile, American consumers swim in a sea of cheap dairy, with supermarkets practically giving away milk next to lottery tickets and cigarettes. The variety is mind-boggling – from Greek yogurt to artisanal moon cheese. But this dairy paradise comes with a sour aftertaste: price whiplash that could give you financial whiplash and the nagging feeling that you’re drinking the last drops of a dying industry.  While Americans enjoy cheaper prices, 72% express concern about corporate consolidation in dairy, per Pew Research.

Price Comparison 2025Canada (USD)US (USD)
Gallon of Milk$4.81$3.00
Block Cheddar (1lb)$9.61$5.99
Greek Yogurt (32oz)$6.65$4.50
Butter (1lb)$5.91$3.99
Annual Household Dairy Spend$888.00$750.00

So, what’s a conscious consumer to do? You can sleep easy in Canada knowing you’ve single-handedly supported a family farm with your $7 yogurt. In America, you can fill a bathtub with milk for the cost of a latte, but it could be hastening the decline of rural America. Pick your poison: overpriced peace of mind or cheap milk with a side of guilt. Step into the dairy aisle, where each purchase carries political weight. 

The Real Showdown 

AspectCanadaUnited States
Regulatory SystemSupply management with production quotas and minimum pricesFree-market with federal milk marketing orders setting regional price floors
Entry CostsHigh ($30,000 per cow for quota rights)Lower, but subject to market volatility
Price StabilityGuaranteed margins through cost-of-production pricingVolatile (prices ranged from $11.54 to $29.80 per hundredweight, 2005-2020)
Average Farm Size96 cows357 cows
Market ProtectionHigh (298% import tariffs)Lower exports 15% of production
InnovationCautious adoption due to quota constraintsAggressive automation to combat labor shortages
Geographic Distribution74% of production in Ontario/QuebecCalifornia, Wisconsin and Idaho
SustainabilityCarbon footprint of 0.94 kg CO2 per literHigher, facing stricter environmental regulations
Trade RelationsLimited market access under USMCA (3.6%)Pushing for increased access to the Canadian market
Future ChallengesRising costs, climate change, shifting consumer preferencesSame as Canada, plus processor consolidation
Government Subsidies$3.2 billion in compensation for trade concessions; $7.18 million for modernizationDairy margin coverage program; $30.78 billion in disaster relief for 2023-2024

The dairy battle between Canada and the US is a tale of misplaced priorities. While Canadian farmers strengthen their supply management bunkers and American producers construct dairy empires, both overlook the common threats: evolving consumer preferences, environmental regulations, and a generation that confuses oat juice with milk. Canada’s quota system guarantees margins but stifles growth. US farmers face a wild west of prices, risking it all on market whims. The result? Canadian farms average 96 cows, while US mega-dairies milk thousands.

Innovation divides them, too. US farms embrace automation like desperate men, while their Canadian counterparts move at a glacial pace constrained by quotas. Trade wars rage on. The USMCA opened Canada’s door, but the US wants to pull it down. Meanwhile, plant-based alternatives sneak in through the window. 

Both sides face rising costs, climate change, and shifting consumer preferences. Yet they’re too busy guarding quotas or outrunning bankers to notice they’re in the same sinking boat – just at opposite ends. The truth is as sharp as a hoof knife: yesterday’s war won’t win tomorrow’s market.

February 2025: The Great North American Milk Spill

During a political standoff, the U.S. and Canada weaponized dairy, causing significant economic harm. Uncle Sam slapped 25% tariffs on Canadian goods, while Maple Leaf retaliated with a CAD 155 billion counterattack. Butter became a battleground overnight, with 74% of U.S. exports to Canada facing annihilation. Meanwhile, Canadian households braced for a $1,900 annual grocery bill hike, as both nations’ consumers got a harsh lesson in the cost of crying over spilled milk. 

The consequences were swift and significant, leading to widespread economic ramifications. Agropur, Canada’s dairy giant, froze production lines as U.S. mega-dairies scrambled to reroute 18% of their suddenly homeless exports. Wisconsin hemorrhaged 75 dairy farms in February alone, while Quebec farmers dumped 2.4 million liters of milk faster than you can say “supply management.” As the canola trade imploded and beef producers bled cash, it became clear that this wasn’t just a trade war but an agricultural armageddon. 

A 30-day truce brought temporary relief, but the writing was on the barn wall. With Mexico joining the WTO dogpile and Silicon Valley securing $250 million to brew milk in labs, both nations’ dairy systems faced an existential threat. As one Wisconsin cheesemaker put it: “We’re fighting over the last drops in the pail while Silicon Valley’s building a whole new bucket.” In this high-stakes game of agricultural chicken, it seems the only winners might be the ones who aren’t playing with real cows. 

Trade War Impact 2025Before TariffsAfter Tariffs% Change
US Exports to Canada$856m$214m-75%
Canadian Dairy Revenue$7.2b$6.5b-10%
US Farm Closures325/month475/month+46%
Consumer Price Index (Dairy)100115+15%

The Bottom Line 

As the dust settles on this bovine battlefield, one thing’s crystal clear: there are no sacred cows in the fight for dairy’s future. Canada’s quota-cushioned farmers and America’s free-range risk-takers face a tsunami of change that doesn’t care about borders or tradition. 

Climate change is turning pastures into deserts. Lab-grown milk is lurking in Silicon Valley incubators. And a whole generation is ghosting dairy for oat lattes and almond milk smoothies. Meanwhile, these two dairy giants are still arguing over who has the better barn door while the cows are escaping through the back. 

Here’s the kicker: neither system is bulletproof. Canada’s dairy fortress is starting to crumble under its weight, pricing out the next generation of farmers. America’s dairy Darwinism creates milk moguls while family farms vanish faster than spilled milk on a hot sidewalk. 

The real winners? They’ll be the mavericks who can milk opportunity from chaos. The farmers look beyond quotas and commodity prices to understand and fulfill consumers’ needs. The innovators who’ll make cows fart less methane, turn manure into rocket fuel, or figure out how to 3D print a perfect cheese curd. 

So, whether you’re team Maple Leaf or team Stars and Stripes, it’s time to wake up and smell the sour milk. The future of dairy lies in integrating stability and opportunity, not in choosing between the two. 

There’s no use crying over spilled subsidies or curdled quotas in this high-stakes game of milk, sweat, and tears. Time is running out; it’s time for those brave enough to cease dwelling on past battles and begin crafting the narrative of tomorrow’s dairy industry fairy tale. 

Now, that’s food for thought. Chew on it.

Key Takeaways:

  • Canadian dairy farmers benefit from financial stability through a supply management system, ensuring predictable income but requiring costly quota investments.
  • The United States’ market-driven approach offers opportunities for rapid growth and export but often results in large-scale operations overshadowing smaller farms.
  • Both systems face significant criticisms and challenges, with Canadian farmers worried about succession and quota costs while American farmers navigate economic volatility.
  • Major influences on both systems include technological advancements, sustainability practices, and cultural expectations across the border.
  • Despite differing strategies, both countries grapple with changing consumer demands and regulatory landscapes.
  • Understanding the nuances of each system is crucial for farmers, consumers, and policymakers in shaping the future of dairy production.

Summary:

The article talks about the differences between Canadian and American dairy farmers. In Canada, strict rules mean stable prices but expensive quotas, while in the U.S., it’s a free-for-all with huge farms and lots of risks. 2025, a trade fight started over $1.2 billion in dairy tariffs. Canada’s small farms and America’s big ones think they’re winning. But really, the challenge is coming from new dairy-free products and climate change. Canadian and U.S. farmers must adapt, or they’ll be left behind while new technology takes over.

Learn more:

Join the Revolution!

Bullvine Daily is your essential e-zine for staying ahead in the dairy industry. With over 30,000 subscribers, we bring you the week’s top news, helping you manage tasks efficiently. Stay informed about milk production, tech adoption, and more, so you can concentrate on your dairy operations. 

NewsSubscribe
First
Last
Consent

Dairy Market Mania: How Heatwaves, Bird Flu, and Heifer Shortages are Shaking Up Milk Production and Prices

Heatwaves, avian influenza, and skyrocketing heifer costs are wreaking havoc on milk production and driving up prices. Are you ready for the mounting challenges in the dairy industry?

Summary:  The dairy markets surged this week, fueled by an unprecedented heatwave, avian influenza, and a heifer shortage, tightening milk supplies. U.S. milk production hit 18.8 billion pounds in June, down 1% from the previous year, continuing a trend of lower output. While higher components like milk solids and butterfat offer some relief, they fall short of meeting demand. Key states saw sharp production declines due to heat and avian flu, amplifying scarcity. This has driven up prices for whey powder, cheese, and butter, presenting mixed outcomes for the industry. Producers are retaining older, less productive cows to sidestep high heifer costs, deteriorating herd productivity and long-term viability. Despite these hurdles, increased milk solids and butterfat output somewhat offset reduced milk production.

Key Takeaways:

  • The dairy markets are heating up as summer sets in, exacerbated by factors like the hot weather, avian influenza, and a shortage of heifers.
  • Milk output in the U.S. was 18.8 billion pounds in June, down 1% from the previous year, marking the lowest first-half production since 2020.
  • High temperatures, particularly in Arizona, California, and New Mexico, have significantly impacted milk production.
  • Avian influenza has further strained production, especially in states like Colorado, Idaho, and Michigan.
  • The trend of keeping older, less productive cows to avoid buying expensive heifers is resulting in reduced milk yields.
  • Increased demand for bottled milk has contributed to tighter supplies, even with higher component levels in milk.
  • Commodity prices, especially for whey powder and cheese, are on the rise due to stronger domestic demand and limited supply.
  • Class III and Class IV milk futures have seen significant gains, reflecting the market’s response to these supply challenges.
  • Political uncertainties, particularly regarding trade relations with China, have temporarily affected feed markets, causing a rally in soybean and corn futures.

As the summer heats up, so do dairy markets. However, the rising concerns, driven by intense heatwaves in critical areas, avian influenza outbreaks, and a persistent heifer shortage, are leading to a significant drop in milk output and profoundly impacting the dairy industry. Arizona and New Mexico experienced the highest temperatures in June, while Colorado and California’s Central Valley saw record-breaking nighttime lows. U.S. milk output in June was 18.8 billion pounds, down 1% from the previous year and the lowest first-half production since 2020. While higher components have kept U.S. milk solids and butterfat production slightly ahead of last year, more is needed to meet the needs of dairy processors. Despite these challenges, the adaptability and resilience of farm managers and industry experts are evident as they manage operations under adverse conditions, necessitating essential modifications effectively.

Heatwaves Hammer U.S. Dairy Industry

StateJune Average Temperature (°F)June Record High Temperature (°F)June Overnight Low Temperature (°F)
Arizona85.6120.075.2
New Mexico79.1110.062.4
Colorado65.7105.050.1
California’s Central Valley82.3115.072.6

Despite Record Temperatures and Aging Herds, the Dairy Industry Remains ResilientThe recent heatwaves’ severity and persistence have set new temperature records in crucial dairy-producing regions like Arizona, New Mexico, Colorado, and California’s Central Valley. This extreme heat has significantly impacted milk output and the health of dairy herds, underlining the severity of the situation.

Arizona and New Mexico experienced the highest temperatures in June, while Colorado and the Central Valley endured record nightly lows. These extreme heat conditions have stressed dairy cows significantly, leading to declining milk production. For instance, Arizona saw a staggering 3.9% reduction in milk output, while New Mexico experienced an even more drastic 12.5% drop. The heatwaves have affected milk production and the dairy herd’s health and productivity, exacerbating the milk supply shortage.

The heatwaves have also changed the mix of dairy cows. Producers are likelier to keep older, less productive cows than invest in more expensive heifers, decreasing the total herd size. This choice, prompted by severe weather, has resulted in an older and less productive dairy herd, worsening the milk supply shortage. Even if the weather fades, the long-term consequences on milk output may linger, putting production levels below the previous year’s standards.

Bird Flu Blunders: Avian Influenza Intensifies the Dairy Dilemma in Key States

Avian influenza has complicated the difficulties confronting the dairy business, notably in Colorado, Idaho, and Michigan. In Colorado, dairy farmers have been hit by harsh heat and avian influenza outbreaks. This twofold danger has compounded the problem, reducing milk supply and affecting overall herd health.

Idaho and Michigan have also seen the effects of avian flu. Milk output in Idaho fell by 1%, while Michigan had a 0.9% decline. The avian influenza outbreaks have increased biosecurity measures and operating expenditures, increasing demand for available resources. Producers in these states are attempting to preserve herd output while limiting the danger of the virus spreading.

Compounding these difficulties, the illness has distracted attention and resources that might have been directed toward other vital concerns, including heifer scarcity and market demands to improve milk supply. Consequently, dairy farmers in these areas face a challenging environment in which every action influences their enterprises’ short—and long-term survival.

Heifer Havoc: Skyrocketing Costs and Aging Cows Threaten Dairy Industry’s Future

YearHeifer Shortage (%)Average Heifer Cost ($)
20205%1400
20217%1600
202210%1800
202313%2000
2024 (Projected)15%2200

One of the major issues currently plaguing the dairy sector is the significant scarcity of heifers. This shortage is primarily driven by the high expenses of purchasing young heifers, which makes dairy farmers more unwilling to renew their herds. The heifer market has seen an inflationary spiral driven by extraordinary feed expenses, veterinary care, and general maintenance, all contributing to increased financial pressures on farm management.

Consequently, many producers choose to keep older cows, which, although cost-effective in the near term, has its own set of issues. These older cows are often less productive than their younger counterparts, decreasing milk output. Keeping these older cows in production results in a less efficient herd, which is bad news for future milk production.

The ramifications of an aging herd are numerous. Reduced milk yields restrict current production capacities and jeopardize the long-term viability of dairy farms. Lower productivity implies that the dairy business may need help to satisfy market demands, especially during peak consumption or export periods. Furthermore, older cows have longer calving intervals and more significant health risks, which may increase veterinary expenditures and a shorter productive lifetime.

The ongoing heifer shortfall may limit the industry’s capacity to recover from recent output slumps. However, with a consistent supply of young, productive heifers, the chances of reversing the downward trend in milk output are high. This situation underscores the need for deliberate investment in herd management and breeding programs to maintain a balanced and profitable dairy herd.

Sweltering Heat and Avian Attacks: U.S. Dairy Industry Faces Production Dip, But High Components Offer Hope

MonthMilk Production (in billion pounds)Change from Previous Year
January19.2-0.5%
February17.8-0.7%
March19.1-0.8%
April18.5-1.2%
May19.0-1.0%
June18.8-1.0%

This summer’s heat has certainly impacted U.S. milk production, which reached 18.8 billion pounds in June, a 1% decrease from the previous year—the first half of this year had a 0.9% decrease in output, the lowest since 2020. While some areas saw record-high temperatures, others were hit by avian influenza, which exacerbated the slump. Compared to previous years, these numbers highlight a disturbing trend compounded by the persistent heifer scarcity and aged herds. Despite these obstacles, there is a bright line: more excellent components imply that U.S. milk solids and butterfat production has continued to exceed prior year levels. This increase is crucial for dairy processors looking to fulfill market demand and sustain production levels despite decreased fluid milk yields. The increased butterfat and solid content mitigate the impact of reduced milk output, ensuring that dairy products remain rich in essential nutritious components.

Scorching Heat and Bird Flu: Regional Milk Production Tanks with Double-Digit Declines

StateProduction Change (%)Factors
Arizona-3.9%Record High Temperatures
California-1.8%Heat Wave
Colorado-1.1%Heat Wave, Avian Influenza
New Mexico-12.5%Record High Temperatures
Idaho-1.0%Avian Influenza
Michigan-0.9%Avian Influenza

Milk production has fallen significantly in states dealing with heatwaves and avian influenza. Arizona’s output fell by a stunning 3.9%, while California saw a 1.8% drop. Colorado was not spared, with a 1.1% decline in production. However, New Mexico had the most severe consequences, dropping milk output by 12.5%. These significant decreases emphasize the negative impact of harsh weather and illness on regional dairy operations, emphasizing the critical need for adaptable measures.

Tight Supply Chain Strains: High Component Levels Can’t Offset Milk Scarcity in Dairy Production 

Tighter milk supplies are having a noticeable impact on dairy product production. The shortage limits production capacity despite greater component levels, such as increased milk solids and butterfat. This bottleneck is visible across many dairy products, resulting in limited supply and price increases.

Notably, fluid milk sales have shown an unusual increase. Sales increased by 0.6% from January to May, adjusted for leap day, compared to the same period in 2023. This is a tiny but meaningful triumph for a sector experiencing falling revenues for decades. Increased bottling demand has put further pressure on milk supply, making it even more difficult for dairy processors to satisfy the industry’s requirements. As a result, although the increase in fluid milk sales is a welcome development, it also exacerbates the scarcity of other dairy products.

Milk Market Madness: Prices Skyrocket as Whey, Cheese, and Butter React to Tight Supplies

MonthClass III Milk Price ($/cwt)Class IV Milk Price ($/cwt)Cheese Price ($/lb)Butter Price ($/lbth)Whey Price ($/lb)Milk Powder Price ($/lb)
April$17.52$18.11$1.85$2.97$0.52$1.20
May$18.25$18.47$1.87$3.04$0.54$1.22
June$19.10$19.03$1.89$3.06$0.55$1.22
July$20.37$20.12$1.91$3.07$0.56$1.24
August$21.42$21.24$1.93$3.09$0.57$1.23
September$21.89$21.55$1.95$3.11$0.58 

The confirmation of decreasing milk output and the likelihood of more decreases has shaken the market. Prices rose, especially in the CME spot market. Whey powder prices skyrocketed from 5.25 to 57 cents per pound, reaching a two-year peak. Strong domestic demand for high-protein whey products and limited milk supply in cheese-producing areas drive significant growth.

Cheese prices have followed suit, rising considerably. CME spot Cheddar barrels increased by 5.75 percent to $1.93, while blocks increased by 6.5 percent at the same price. U.S. cheese production has been defined as “steady to lighter,” cheese stocks have declined, notably with a 5.8% reduction in cold storage warehouses as of June 30, compared to mid-year 2023. This reduced stockpile and record-breaking exports have resulted in tighter U.S. cheese supply and higher pricing. However, potential supply shortages will have a more significant impact in the future.

Butter had a modest gain, inching ahead by 1.5 percent to settle at $3.09. Although there is still a significant supply of butter in storage (6.8% more than in June 2023), concerns about availability as the year develops have affected the price.

During these price increases, the futures market responded strongly. Class III futures increased by 84 percent to $21.42 in September. Class IV futures increased by almost 20% and settled above $21, demonstrating strong market confidence amid tighter supplies and rising demand.

Whey Powder Bonanza: Prices Hit Two-Year High, Boost Class III Values, and Drive Market Dynamics

The whey powder industry has experienced a startling jump, with prices increasing from 5.25 to 57 cents per pound—a more than 10% increase. This is the highest price in two years, indicating a positive trend supported by strong local demand for high-protein whey products. Furthermore, tighter milk supply in cheese-producing areas has contributed to the rising trend. The whey market’s strength is a big boost for Class III values, as each penny gains in the whey price adds around 6˼ to neighboring Class III futures. Spot whey prices increased by about 7% in June and July compared to the first half of the year, resulting in a 40% increase in Class III pricing. Dairy experts should actively follow these changes since they substantially impact profitability and market dynamics.

Cheese Market Surge: Soaring Prices and Shrinking Inventories Signal Major Shifts

The cheese market is undergoing a significant transition, with prices constantly rising. CME spot Cheddar barrels surged considerably, reaching $1.93 per barrel, while blocks followed suit, reaching $1.93 per pound. Several variables contribute to these price changes, as does the present position of low cheese supplies.

For starters, cheese production in the United States has been defined as “steady to lighter,” which necessarily reduces the available supply. Cheese stocks fell in June as yearly, but this year’s drop was magnified by counter-seasonal falls from March to May. This condition resulted in 5.8% less cheese in cold storage on June 30 compared to mid-year 2023.

The dairy sector has also profited from record-breaking exports, which have helped to constrain the U.S. cheese supply. However, this phenomenon has a double edge. Although export demand has boosted prices and decreased local stockpiles, its long-term viability is still being determined. Export sales have begun to decline, and although local demand remains solid, it is unlikely that it will be strong enough to propel cheese prices beyond $2.

Butter Market Alert: Holiday Shortages Loom Despite Stock Increases and Rising Prices

The butter market saw a slight stock drop in June, indicating more considerable supply restrictions in the dairy industry. Despite a 6.8% increase in storage since June 2023, butter merchants are concerned about probable shortages in supermarket stores as we approach the holiday season in November. Butter prices have increased by 1.5 percent this week to $3.09, indicating a cautious outlook. The sector is prepared for a challenging quarter owing to strong demand and tight supply constraints.

Milk Powder Market Movement: Prices Surge to Five-Month High Amid Tight Supplies and Global Competition 

After months of sluggish pricing, the spot milk powder market has finally stirred, rising into the mid-$1.20s and finishing at a five-month high of $1.2325. This considerable increase is attributable to a combination of causes, the most prominent of which is dramatically reduced U.S. milk powder stocks due to continuous decreased production levels. Dairy managers and industry experts should be aware that competition for export markets is becoming more severe, a situation aggravated by China’s lack of considerable purchase activity. While New Zealand’s milk production season has started slowly, Europe’s milk output has progressively increased, topping year-ago levels by 0.4% in April and 0.6% in May. This increase in European manufacturing may soon lead to more robust milk powder offers, possibly weakening U.S. export competitiveness. Farm managers must be diligent about market signals and inventory management to negotiate a tighter supply chain.

Future Shock: Spot Market Gains Propel Class III & IV Milk Contracts to New Heights

The recent increase in spot markets has caused significant volatility in the futures market, notably for Class III and IV milk products. Futures prices have risen dramatically due to increasing spot prices for dairy commodities such as whey powder and cheese. The September Class III futures contract increased by 84 percent to $21.42, while Class IV futures climbed roughly 20 percent to remain over $21.

These price increases are primarily due to U.S. milk production growth limits. Record-breaking heatwaves have drastically reduced milk output in dairy cattle. The avian influenza has further exacerbated these losses by lowering herd size in important dairy states. An aged herd, compounded by the high expense of procuring replacement heifers, further impedes production advances. Despite greater component levels contributing to production, total milk supply remains constrained, driving up market prices.

Finally, more robust spot markets and the twin hurdles of heat-induced production losses and avian flu effects have resulted in an optimistic forecast for the futures market. Dairy farmers and market analysts should pay careful attention to these trends as they negotiate the complexity of a business experiencing unprecedented pressure.

Political Jitters Jolt Feed Markets: Potential Trade War with China Spurs Soybean and Corn Futures Rally

This week, political uncertainty has placed a pall over the feed markets. The main issue is the possibility of a fresh trade war with China, fueled by the changing political situation in the United States. As talk grows about a potential second term for Trump, battling against Vice President Harris rather than an aged President Biden, financial experts are concerned that trade dynamics may alter substantially. Tightening ties between the U.S. and China might significantly affect U.S. soybean exports, the world’s largest market.

In reaction to this uncertainty, the market saw a brief respite in feed price reductions early in the week. November soybean futures increased by more than 40%, while December corn futures increased by 16%. Traders assessed political concerns against crop quantities yet to be harvested and stored. However, by the end of the week, emphasis had returned to the immediate plenty of grain, resulting in price stability.

Today, December corn ended at $4.10 a bushel, up a cent from last Friday. November soybeans finished at $10.46, while December soybean meal was $324 a ton, up $19 from the previous week’s multi-year low. Despite short-term political uncertainty, the overall prognosis indicates that grain will remain plentiful and reasonably affordable shortly.

The Bottom Line

As we confront an extraordinary summer challenge, excessive heat, avian influenza, and heifer shortages have significantly reduced milk supply, dramatically dropping U.S. milk output. These gains have scarcely compensated for the shortages despite increased product components such as milk solids and butterfat. Extreme heatwaves in important dairy states such as Arizona, California, Colorado, and New Mexico and avian influenza outbreaks in Colorado, Idaho, and Michigan have substantially reduced production. Furthermore, the unwillingness to invest in pricey heifers has resulted in an aged, less productive dairy herd, impeding future expansion. These factors and a minor increase in fluid milk demand have pushed prices up, particularly for whey powder, cheese, and butter, severely hurting consumer costs and industry profits. The present status of the dairy business in the United States highlights the critical need for adaptive methods, such as improved herd management and investments in younger cows, to mitigate the consequences of climate change and disease outbreaks. How will your business adjust to strengthen resilience and ensure future output in these challenging times?

Learn more: 

Send this to a friend