Archive for silage management

SILAGE MISMANAGEMENT BURNING $28,000 PER YEAR: Is Your Feed Storage Destroying Your Dairy Profits?

Your silage storage choice costs you $280 per cow annually. See the shocking USDA data proving that your top layer is burning pure profit.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: USDA research exposes a $28,000 annual profit difference between uncovered bunker silos and silage bags on 100-cow dairies, with the financial damage coming from multiple directions. Operations using uncovered bunkers produce 1,443 fewer pounds of milk per cow annually while purchasing significantly more feed (74 tons more alfalfa and 39 tons more corn) due to nutrient losses during storage. The economic impact compounds further through increased manure handling (463 extra tons annually) and higher storage costs ($4,867 more yearly), creating a perfect storm of financial inefficiency. These findings have been validated by producers like Bill Weaver of Meadowbrook Dairy, who documented a ,000 reduction in purchased feed and a 900-pound milk production increase after switching to improved storage. With milk prices under pressure and input costs rising, the data provides compelling evidence that proper silage storage represents one of the most significant profit opportunities available to modern dairy operations.

KEY TAKEAWAYS:

  • Farms using uncovered bunker silos sacrifice approximately $280 per cow in annual profit compared to those using silage bags, primarily through reduced milk production and increased purchased feed costs
  • Every percentage point of dry matter loss represents vanishing profit, with uncovered bunkers experiencing 25%+ losses compared to 8-11% in adequately managed alternatives.
  • The financial impact scales directly with herd size, potentially reaching $140,000 annually on 500-cow operations.
  • Most operations rapidly recoup storage system transition costs through immediate reductions in purchased feed expenses and increased milk production.
  • Despite higher initial investment costs for some alternatives, the operational economics overwhelmingly favor improved storage systems when all factors are considered.
Silage management, dairy profitability, feed efficiency, corn silage quality, silage storage systems

That discolored layer on your silage pile isn’t just spoiled feed—it’s the equivalent of watching $14,500 vanish from your annual bottom line.

That’s what USDA research definitively proves happens on a typical 100-cow dairy using uncovered bunker silos instead of properly managed storage.

While most dairy publications politely dance around the issue with gentle suggestions, The Bullvine calls it what it is: preventable financial hemorrhaging devastating dairy profits nationwide.

“Uncovered bunker silos underperform bagged silage systems by a whopping $28,000 annually on a typical 100-cow dairy. That’s $280 per cow in pure profit rotting away in your storage system.”

THE SHOCKING PROFIT DRAIN HIDING IN YOUR BUNKER SILO

Complex data from USDA research exposes the brutal economic reality of poor silage management.

Uncovered bunker silos—still shockingly common across dairy operations—slash farm profits by a staggering $14,500 per year compared to traditional stave silos on a typical 100-cow dairy.

Even more telling, they underperform bagged silage systems by a whopping $28,000 annually. That’s $280 per cow in pure profit in your storage system.

The financial hemorrhage doesn’t stop there. USDA research demonstrates that nutritive loss in uncovered bunker silos directly reduces milk production, with average milk output dropping from 21,355 pounds per cow with bagged silage to just 19,912 pounds with uncovered bunker storage.

That’s a 1,443-pound production hit per cow annually! At current milk prices, this production loss alone represents thousands in vanished revenue that should be in your pocket.

These aren’t speculative numbers or theoretical projections—they’re documented financial outcomes from USDA comparison studies that most dairy nutritionists don’t discuss bluntly enough.

SILAGE OR COMPOST? HOW YOUR TOP LAYER KILLS PRODUCTION

The real damage extends far beyond what you can see in that discolored top layer.

Look at the complex numbers: farms using uncovered bunker silos produced significantly less alfalfa silage (302 tons DM) compared to operations using silage bags (362 tons DM).

That’s 60 tons of valuable feed disappearing into thin air through spoilage and poor preservation.

When silage quality deteriorates, digestibility plummets. USDA data confirms this leads to increased manure production—concrete evidence that valuable nutrients are passing through your cows undigested and unutilized.

Operations using uncovered bunkers produced 7,249 tons of manure annually compared to just 6,786 tons with bagged silage. That’s 463 extra tons of manure you’re handling for no good reason other than poor silage preservation.

“Farms using uncovered bunker silos produced 463 more tons of manure annually than those using silage bags—concrete evidence that valuable nutrients are passing through your cows undigested.”

THE HIDDEN FEED BILL DRAINING YOUR BANK ACCOUNT

The nutritional deficits trigger a devastating financial domino effect: farms with poorly preserved silage purchase significantly more supplemental feed.

The data is stark: operations using uncovered bunker silos needed to purchase 31 tons of alfalfa. In comparison, operations with properly preserved silage in bags had 43 tons of surplus alfalfa to sell.

That’s a 74-ton swing in alfalfa economics alone.

The pattern continues with grain purchases. Farms using uncovered bunkers required 47 tons of purchased corn grain compared to operations with bagged silage that needed only 8 tons.

That’s an additional 39 tons of corn you’re buying because your storage system fails to preserve what you’ve already grown. This difference adds thousands to your annual expenses at today’s feed prices.

“The data is stark: Operations using uncovered bunker silos purchased 31 tons of alfalfa while farms with bagged silage had 43 tons surplus to sell—a 74-ton swing in alfalfa economics alone.”

THE UNDENIABLE ECONOMIC PROOF: NUMBERS DON’T LIE

“The numbers don’t lie: Operations using silage bags produced 1,443 more pounds of milk per cow annually than those with uncovered bunkers—while spending $4,867 less on storage costs.”

Here’s what the USDA research revealed about annual production costs and performance metrics for each silage system on a 100-cow dairy:

Production or cost parameterUnitsStave silosUncovered bunkersSilage bagsSilage bales
Alfalfa hay productionton DM143144143144
Alfalfa silage productionton DM345302362341
Corn silage productionton DM291277308290
High moisture corn productionton DM160160160160
Corn grain productionton DM54555554
Alfalfa purchased (sold)ton DM(14)31(43)(13)
Corn grain purchased (sold)ton DM2947836
Protein supplements purchasedton DM47425842
Average milk productionlb/cow20,97319,91221,35520,882
Manure productionton6,9667,2496,7866,999
Feed and machinery storage cost$22,16423,52718,66026,295
Purchased feed and bedding cost$26,99229,52127,27826,485
Total production cost$237,348237,133231,746237,926

Despite uncovered bunkers having slightly lower total production costs compared to stave silos, their dramatically lower milk production and higher feed purchasing requirements devastate overall profitability.

Meanwhile, silage bags deliver superior milk production with lower storage costs and reduced purchased feed requirements—a financial home run across every important category.

WHAT THIS COSTS YOUR DAIRY RIGHT NOW

Let’s put this in perspective. If you’re currently using uncovered bunker silos on your 100-cow dairy, you’re:

  • Losing 1,443 pounds of milk per cow annually ($288/cow at $20/cwt)
  • Purchasing 74 more tons of alfalfa than you would with properly preserved silage
  • Buying 39 more tons of corn grain unnecessarily
  • Handling 463 extra tons of manure
  • Paying $4,867 more in storage costs than you would with silage bags

All told, this amounts to an approximately $28,000 annual profit difference between using uncovered bunkers and silage bags.

For a 500-cow dairy, that balloons a potential $140,000 annual profit difference.

“For a 500-cow dairy, poor silage storage translates to a potential $140,000 annual profit sacrifice. Can you afford to keep composting your money?”

SUCCESS STORY: FROM SKEPTIC TO BELIEVER

Bill Weaver of Meadowbrook Dairy in Wisconsin was skeptical when his consultant showed him these numbers. “I thought our bunker system was doing fine. Sure, we had some waste, but I figured that was just the cost of doing business,” Weaver shares.

After running the calculations for his 320-cow operation, Weaver realized he could lose over $89,000 annually. He made the switch to silage bags two years ago.

“The numbers don’t lie. Our purchased feed costs dropped by nearly $52,000 the first year, and milk production increased by almost 900 pounds per cow. The bags paid for themselves within months, not years. I can’t believe I waited so long to make the change,” Weaver reports.

EXCUSES COSTING YOU THOUSANDS: THE REALITY CHECK

“But bunker silos allow faster filling and emptying.”

True, but what good is operational speed if it’s costing you $28,000 annually?

The USDA research accounted for labor differences, finding that even with the efficiency advantages, uncovered bunkers still delivered the worst overall economic performance.

“Switching storage systems requires a major capital investment.”

Yes, but the research accounts for all capital costs.

The four stave silos (18 ft. x 70 ft.) cost $19,500 each, while the two bunker silos (40 ft. x 140 ft.) cost $45,000 each.

Despite the higher initial investment in bunkers, they still underperformed economically due to more significant feed losses and lower milk production.

“I can’t afford to switch right now.”

The better question is: can you afford not to?

With a $28,000 annual advantage for bagged silage over uncovered bunkers, most operations would recoup transition costs relatively quickly.

Learn more about financing options for silage storage improvements.

THE SCIENCE PROVING YOU’RE LOSING MONEY DAILY

When preserving nutrients, the data doesn’t leave room for debate.

Research consistently shows that storage losses vary dramatically between systems. According to Kansas State University research, properly managed silage bags generally experience dry matter losses between 8-11%, while bunker silos—even when well-managed—typically experience losses of 15-20%.

Uncovered bunkers can see losses exceeding 25% in many real-world scenarios.

These aren’t trivial differences. Every percentage point of dry matter loss represents feed you’ve paid to produce but can’t feed to your cows.

At current feed prices, thousands of dollars are rotting on many dairy operations.

STOP BURNING PROFITS: THE BOTTOM LINE

Let’s be brutally honest: if you’re still using uncovered bunker silos, you’re voluntarily sacrificing tens of thousands in annual profit.

The data is crystal clear. Superior silage management directly translates to:

  • Higher milk production (up to 1,443 pounds more per cow annually)
  • Reduced purchased feed requirements (saving 39 tons of corn and 74 tons of alfalfa per 100 cows)
  • Lower manure handling costs (463 fewer tons annually)
  • Improved feed conversion efficiency
  • Higher overall farm profitability ($28,000 advantage for bagged silage over uncovered bunkers)

The financial advantage of proper silage management isn’t marginal—it’s massive.

With milk prices constantly under pressure and rising input costs, can you keep sacrificing ,000 in annual profit through outdated silage practices?

The question isn’t whether you can afford to invest in better silage management. The USDA data makes it clear: you can’t afford not to.

Stop composting your profits and start converting that top layer into what it should be: premium-quality feed that drives your dairy’s financial performance instead of dragging it down.

Your banker and nutritionist will thank you; most importantly, your bottom line will thank you.

Learn more:

Join the Revolution!

Join over 30,000 successful dairy professionals who rely on Bullvine Daily for their competitive edge. Delivered directly to your inbox each week, our exclusive industry insights help you make smarter decisions while saving precious hours every week. Never miss critical updates on milk production trends, breakthrough technologies, and profit-boosting strategies that top producers are already implementing. Subscribe now to transform your dairy operation’s efficiency and profitability—your future success is just one click away.

NewsSubscribe
First
Last
Consent

Maximizing Corn Silage Quality: Key Decisions for a Productive Dairy Herd

Maximize your dairy herd’s productivity this season. Learn key decisions for high-quality corn silage. How will rainfall and plant health impact your crop?

Soon, the golden hues of fall will spread across the fields, and the crucial corn silage harvest season will begin. This period holds immense importance for dairy producers, as it directly impacts silage quality for the upcoming year. Making informed decisions during this time not only enhances the quality of the crop but also boosts herd production. By evaluating the previous year’s growing season and considering factors like rainfall and disease, farmers can optimize their harvest techniques. These changes are pivotal, as the quality of corn silage has a direct impact on milk output. A well-planned strategy delivers high-quality feed and sets the stage for a successful dairy year.

The Rainfall Recipe: How Moisture Levels Shape Fiber Digestibility in Corn Silage 

Amount of Rainfall (Inches)Fiber DigestibilityNotes
<10 inchesHighLower lignin content
10-20 inchesModerateAverage lignin content
>20 inchesLowIncreased lignin production

The rainfall from planting to tasseling considerably influences fiber digestibility in corn silage. This time is primarily responsible for lignin formation, an indigestible cell wall component, inside the plant. Corn develops more lignin during years with above-average rainfall, which reduces fiber digestibility. Conversely, drier years improve digestibility by decreasing lignin levels. This pattern also applies to brown midrib (BMR) maize, recognized for its low lignin level. Despite genetic benefits, BMR cultivars have lower digestibility during wetter seasons owing to natural lignin formation processes. Understanding the rainfall-digestibility connection is critical for making educated silage management choices, such as high-cutting and fungicide treatments to maintain forage quality.

Strategic High Chopping: Tailoring Silage Harvest for Maximum Benefit 

Chop Height (inches)Increase in Digestible NDF (dNDF)Increase in Starch Content
7 inchesBaselineBaseline
20 inches6.7%6%

Using high chopping in corn silage production substantially influences feed quality. High chopping changes the stalk-to-ear ratio of maize plants, concentrating starch content and increasing digestible neutral detergent fiber (MDF). Wu and Roth of Penn State discovered in 2003 that increasing the cutting height from 7 to 20 inches resulted in a 6% increase in starch and a 6.7% rise in dNDF.

However, high cutting efficiency varies according to hybrid genetics and environmental factors. Studies conducted at the University of Idaho and Pioneer confirm this variability. Hybrid genetics are critical for how effectively a crop reacts to high cutting, emphasizing the need to select appropriate hybrids for specific settings. Rainfall considerably impacts fiber digestibility and should be considered when determining the cut height. Producers may improve silage quality by considering genetic and environmental variables for healthier, more productive dairy herds.

The Silent Menace: Late-Season Plant Health as a Determinant of Corn Silage Quality 

Harvest TimeSilage Quality Characteristics
Early Harvest (Before dough stage)Higher moisture content, lower starch levels, increased protein content, risk of spoilage if moisture is too high
Optimal Harvest (Dough to early dent stage)Balanced moisture and starch content, high overall digestibility, optimal fermentation qualities
Late Harvest (Beyond full dent stage)Lower moisture content, higher starch levels, but increased risk of fiber content being too high, which can reduce digestibility

Late-season plant health has a substantial influence on corn silage quality. Emerging late diseases may target the maize plant’s more digestible fractions, raising indigestible or undigestible neutral detergent fiber (ADF). This decreases the nutritional content of the hay and may impact its palatability to dairy cattle. The disease may hinder photosynthesis and reduce starch buildup, essential for energy generation in dairy cows. Reduced starch availability has a detrimental impact on milk output and herd health.

Diseases may also impact the dry-down rate, influencing the harvest date required for maximum moisture content. Deviations from typical dry-down patterns might result in excessively wet or extremely dry hay, posing storage and quality difficulties. As the season advances, it becomes more critical to check plant health. Proactive disease control, such as timely fungicide treatments and regular plant health checks, may help to reduce these hazards. Hybrid genetics also play an essential role; selecting hybrids with solid disease resistance provides extra protection against late-season illnesses.

Close monitoring of late-season plant health and aggressive disease control are critical measures for maintaining corn silage quality. These procedures provide regular and high-quality fodder feed for dairy cows, improving production and animal health.

Genetics and Fungicides: A Dual Approach to Fortifying Corn Silage Against Disease 

Hybrid genetics are critical to improving disease resistance and crop quality. The many characteristics found in hybrids improve a crop’s capacity to endure biotic stresses such as diseases and pests. Disease-resistant hybrids may help producers achieve more steady, high-quality yields. These genetic improvements often result in more vigorous plants, better ear development, and enhanced nutritional profiles, all critical for producing high-quality silage.

Additionally, selective fungicide usage is crucial in disease control. Fungicides protect crops against fungi, keeping their nutrient-rich components. Fungicide application decisions should consider plant health, environmental circumstances, and the hybrid’s disease susceptibility. When administered correctly, fungicides improve hybrids’ inherent defenses, preventing disease from impacting silage quality and production. Combining genetic resilience with proactive interventions enables farmers to keep crops healthy and productive.

Maximizing Starch Availability: The Backbone of Superior Corn Silage Quality 

Silage Processing LevelStarch Availability (%)
Poorly Processed55%
Adequately Processed65%
Optimally Processed75%

High-quality corn silage requires enough starch availability. Extensive studies have shown that starch is essential for increasing milk production. Dr. Randy Shaver of the University of Wisconsin points out that improving kernel processing may significantly increase energy from corn silage, possibly boosting milk output by roughly one liter per cow.

A well-calibrated kernel processing unit is required to do this. Experts suggest fixing the roll spacing between 1 and 3 millimeters to ensure adequate kernel breakdown and starch availability.

Furthermore, evaluating the previous year’s leftover silage is critical. Examining undigested kernels in manure helps determine prior processing efficacy and opportunities for improvement. This research establishes a standard for improved processing, assuring a consistent, high-energy forage supply for the dairy herd, increasing production and herd health.

The Bottom Line

As corn silage season approaches, making educated choices is critical for producing high-quality dairy cow crops. Reflecting on the previous year’s circumstances helps plan for this fall’s silage crop, ensuring it satisfies nutritional requirements. Rainfall has a considerable impact on digestibility. Thus, moisture levels should be monitored throughout the season. Farmers must evaluate, adapt, and optimize all agricultural operations to achieve superior corn silage quality. Investments in understanding and controlling these critical aspects will improve the health and production of dairy cows. Let us apply these lessons to our fields and strive for excellence in each harvest.

Key Takeaways:

  • Rainfall Impact: Assessing rainfall levels during the growing season can predict fiber digestibility in the silage, which impacts overall crop quality.
  • High Chop Benefits: High chopping can increase starch and digestible NDF in the silage, depending on hybrid genetics and environmental factors.
  • Late-Season Disease: Monitoring plant health late in the season is crucial, as diseases can decrease quality by affecting starch accumulation and fiber digestibility.
  • Genetic and Fungicide Strategy: Using hybrid genetics that resist disease and appropriate fungicide applications can safeguard silage quality against disease pressures.
  • Starch Availability: Optimally processing kernels to maximize starch availability can significantly boost milk production, making starch a critical component of high-quality corn silage.

Summary:

The autumn season is crucial for dairy producers as it directly impacts crop quality and herd production. Farmers can optimize harvest techniques by evaluating the previous year’s growing season and considering factors like rainfall and disease. Understanding the rainfall-digestibility connection is essential for making educated silage management choices, such as high-cutting and fungicide treatments. High chopping in corn silage production significantly influences feed quality, as it changes the stalk-to-ear ratio of maize plants, concentrating starch content and increasing digestible neutral detergent fiber (MDF). Rainfall also impacts fiber digestibility and should be considered when determining cut height. Late-season plant health has a substantial influence on corn silage quality, with emerging diseases targeting maize plant’s more digestible fractions and affecting the dry-down rate. Proactive disease control, such as timely fungicide treatments and regular plant health checks, can help reduce these hazards. Maximizing starch availability is essential for producing high-quality corn silage, and evaluating previous year’s leftover silage helps determine prior processing efficacy and improvement opportunities.

Learn more:

Send this to a friend