Archive for market stability

Will the Surge in Milk Prices Last? Analyzing Trends and Future Outlook

Will the surge in milk prices last? Discover the trends and future outlook for milk, cheese, and butter prices, and what it means for your grocery budget.

The early-year increase in milk prices has pleasantly surprised dairy producers in changing agricultural markets, characterized by shifting consumer preferences and fluctuating grain prices. While Class IV milk reached $21.08, a level not seen since mid-2022, June’s Class III milk price was notably $19.87, the most since December 2022. The economic situation of dairy farmers depends on this increase, which also influences the whole agricultural industry. With May’s revenue above feed price rising to $10.52, the greatest since November 2022, dairy producers have optimism given changing grain prices.

Record Highs in Class III and IV Milk Prices Signal Potential Market Stability

MonthClass III Milk Price ($)Class IV Milk Price ($)
January 202318.2719.60
February 202318.8820.22
March 202319.1720.75
April 202319.4421.05
May 202319.7521.08
June 202319.8721.08

The recent record highs in Class III and IV milk prices, the highest since December 2022, signal a potential market stability. With Class III milk reaching $19.87 and Class IV prices hitting $21.08, this increase could provide a stable market environment that would benefit both customers and operators, instilling a sense of reassurance in the industry.

Optimizing Feed Costs: A Path to Enhanced Dairy Farm Profitability

MonthFeed Cost ($/ton)
January290
February285
March275
April270
May268
June265

The recent increases in revenue above feed cost have substantially benefited dairy producers. Driven by dropping grain prices, the May number of $10.52 is the highest since November 2022. Grain prices fall; lowering feed costs increases dairy farmers’ profit margins. Should present grain market patterns continue, dairy producers might lock in low feed costs, thus providing financial stability for the following year. Using forward contracts or other financial instruments to hedge against growing feed costs can guarantee ongoing profitability. Although the future is bright, awareness is required as grain market volatility might rapidly alter the scene and call for swift decisions. The conditions provide a great chance to maximize feed costs and increase revenue above feed prices, enabling a steady and prosperous future in the dairy sector.

The Evolution of Cheese Production: American vs. Italian Varieties 

MonthAmerican Cheese Production (Million lbs)Italian Cheese Production (Million lbs)
January475.2487.1
February450.6472.8
March460.5485.9
April470.3490.7
May488.2505.0
June473.0498.3

The mechanics of American cheese manufacturing have shown interesting patterns deserving of conversation. Since the beginning of the year, output has been steadily declining; May 2023 shows a 5.7% drop over the year before. This tendency is shocking when compared to consistent milk output statistics. Production methods and market tastes most certainly have the answer. Particularly Italian-type cheeses, there is a clear shift towards other cheese types. Italian cheese output is much greater than it has been in 2023 and exceeds past year averages. Changing consumer preferences, such as preferring mozzarella and parmesan over conventional American cheese, caused this change.

Essential elements include worldwide gastronomic trends and well-liked meals such as pasta and pizza with Italian cheese. Driven by a passion for culinary variety and premium, handcrafted goods, consumer behavior demonstrates a rising predisposition for varied and gourmet cheese selections. Responding to worldwide demand trends, the sector is realigning its manufacturing strategy to take advantage of higher-margin items.

Therefore, the whole cheese production spectrum is vital even if American cheese stocks are still below the previous year’s. This implies that American cheese production is declining, led by Italian-type cheese’s appeal and significant outputs, but the sector is rebounding. The industry creates paths for possible market stability and profitability as it adjusts to these changing consumer patterns.

Analyzing American Cheese Inventory: What Lower Levels Mean for Future Pricing

MonthAmerican Cheese Inventory (Million Pounds)Year-Over-Year Change (%)
January700-3%
February710-2%
March720-1%
April715-4%
May700-5%

American cheese inventory has always been below last year, which should help to explain why prices should rise given demand growth. The fluctuations in overall cheese output—some months larger and others lower—have kept stockpiles close. Still, demand for American cheese has not skyrocketed; careful consumption has kept prices erratic instead of steadily increasing.

Should demand follow last year’s trends, limited supply may cause prices to rise. Cheese consumers’ careful approach shows a wait-and-see attitude toward changing output. Record-high cheese exports in March, April, and May positively signal worldwide solid demand, supporting the market even with higher pricing points.

American cheese prices can get under increasing pressure if strong export demand meets or surpasses local consumption. Stable or declining feed prices increase the likelihood of this, enhancing dairy companies’ general profitability. Thus, cheese inventory and demand dynamics provide a complex projection with possible price rises depending on the stability of the local and foreign markets.

Robust Cheese Exports: Navigating Record Highs and Future Uncertainties 

Month2022 Cheese Exports (million pounds)2023 Cheese Exports (million pounds)Percentage Change
January75.581.2+7.5%
February68.172.4+6.3%
March73.078.5+7.5%
April74.280.1+7.9%
May76.482.3+7.7%

With record highs in March, April, and May, the latest patterns in cheese exports show a strong market presence. This expansion indicates a robust global demand even if cheese prices increase. Higher costs usually discourage foreign consumers, but the consistency in export numbers indicates a strong worldwide taste for U.S. cheese. This helps the dairy sector maintain a competitive advantage in changing pricing.

Still, the viability of this tendency is being determined. Should prices keep rising, specific foreign markets could change their buying policies, reducing demand. A wide variety of cheese products appealing to different tastes might balance this risk and guarantee ongoing demand.

Strong cheese exports support the worldwide posture of the U.S. dairy sector and help to steady home milk prices. Strong cheese and butter exports should provide dairy producers a solid basis as worldwide butter demand increases, enabling them to negotiate price constraints and market expectations boldly.

Although cheese exports are moving in an encouraging direction now, stakeholders must be alert. Maintaining development depends on examining price changes and reactions in foreign markets. Balancing high local pricing with worldwide solid demand will rely primarily on creative ideas in strategic market participation and product offers.

Global Butter Demand: Navigating the Surge and Potential Market Ripples 

YearDomestic Demand (Million Pounds)International Demand (Million Pounds)Total Demand (Million Pounds)
20201,4801,2952,775
20211,5251,3202,845
20221,5451,3502,895
20231,5701,3752,945

A promising increase in international butter demand suggests a possible influence on butter prices in the following months. Driven by better economic times and a rising consumer taste for dairy products, recent statistics show a consistent comeback in world butter exports. Rising worldwide demand will cause butter prices to be under increasing pressure. Strong export demand historically matches rising local pricing, which helps manufacturers. Should export growth continue, this tendency is likely to endure.

Nevertheless, supply chain interruptions, geopolitical concerns, and changing feed prices might influence market circumstances. Low-cost manufacturers from developing nations also bring challenges of price competition. Driven by strong worldwide demand, the butter industry seems ready for expansion, yet players must constantly observe changing dynamics.

Strategic Outlook: Navigating the Future of Milk Prices Amid Market Dynamics and Economic Factors

Milk prices’ path will rely on several significant variables that combine market dynamics with general economic circumstances. While sustained high prices provide hope, they also present possibilities and problems for buyers and producers.

High prices allow producers to increase profitability through capitalization. Locking in favorable feed prices might lead to significant cost savings, considering the present grain price pressure. Diverse manufacturing of highly sought-after cheeses, including Italian-type cheeses, could improve income sources, fostering a sense of optimism in the industry.

Risks, however, include changes in foreign demand and erratic market circumstances. Higher costs discourage worldwide consumers, affecting local pricing and exports. Furthermore, changes in consumer tastes toward plant-based dairy substitutes might slow down conventional dairy industry expansion. To stay competitive, the sector has to be creative.

Buyers must guarantee consistent supply chains in retail and food service despite changing customer patterns and costs. Higher prices need flexible pricing policies and intelligent buying. Matching goods with customer tastes for sustainability, and better choices might provide a business advantage.

Although milk prices’ future is bright and unknown, stakeholders may utilize strategic foresight and flexibility to seize possibilities and reduce risk. Tracking consumer behavior and market trends can help buyers and producers flourish in a changing dairy environment.

The Bottom Line

The present success in Class III and IV milk pricing shows a solid but delicate balance for dairy farmers as we negotiate the subtleties of the dairy market. Recent highs encourage a look at lifespan and environmental impact. Changing cheese production patterns, grain price swings, and better revenue over feed ratios highlight a dynamic market. The drop in American cheese output against the increase in Italian cheese reveals a complicated customer choice and market adaption story. Strong cheese export performance reveals the sector’s worldwide resiliency even against growing prices. This should inspire cautious optimism by implying better circumstances ahead and continuous foreign demand. Still, volatility is natural, especially given the changing global butter demand and possible export rebounding. Shielding against downturns mostly depends on careful planning and hedging of expenses. In the end, even if the increase in milk prices provides relief and a promising future, monitoring and market and consumer trend adaptability are crucial. Maintaining momentum and guaranteeing long-term viability will depend on pushing sustainability and openness.

Key Takeaways:

  • Higher Milk Prices: Both Class III and Class IV milk prices reached their highest levels since December 2022, signaling potential market stability.
  • Enhanced Income Over Feed: The income over feed price has been improving, with lower grain prices potentially boosting dairy farm profitability in the near term.
  • Shift in Cheese Production: A noticeable trend towards Italian-type cheese production, despite a decline in American cheese output, could reshape market dynamics.
  • Consistent Cheese Inventory: Lower American cheese inventory levels, paired with steady demand, may lead to higher prices if consumption rises.
  • Strong Export Markets: Record-high cheese exports in recent months indicate robust international demand, which could sustain higher prices moving forward.
  • Global Butter Demand: Improving international butter demand suggests potential price increases if export strength continues throughout the year.

Summary:

The dairy industry has experienced a significant increase in milk prices, signaling potential market stability. Class IV milk reached $21.08, the highest level since mid-2022, and June’s Class III milk price was $19.87, the most since December 2022. This has impacted the economic situation of dairy farmers and the agricultural industry. May’s revenue above feed price rose to $10.52, giving dairy producers optimism due to changing grain prices. Record highs in Class III and IV milk prices provide a stable market environment that benefits both customers and operators. Lowering feed costs can increase dairy farmers’ profit margins, and if present grain market patterns continue, producers might lock in low feed costs, providing financial stability for the following year. Using forward contracts or other financial instruments to hedge against growing feed costs can guarantee ongoing profitability. The evolution of cheese production, particularly American vs. Italian varieties, has shown interesting patterns, with strong export demand meeting or surpassing local consumption, enhancing dairy companies’ profitability. Global butter demand is expected to influence butter prices in the coming months, driven by better economic times and rising consumer tastes for dairy products.

Learn more:

Decline in Dutch Milk Supply Amid Rising EU Production and Stable European Milk Prices

Find out why Dutch milk supply is dropping while EU production is growing. What does this mean for European milk prices? Check out the latest trends and market changes.

As the Dutch dairy industry struggles with falling milk production, Europe faces a curious paradox: a ‘milk lake.’ This situation, where there is an excess milk supply, highlights the complex dynamics within the European dairy market and broader agricultural trends reshaping the industry. This article examines the contrasting developments in Dutch milk supply and rising milk production across the EU, as well as the ‘milk lake’ implications on market stability and pricing mechanisms.

While the Netherlands has seen a continuous decline in milk output due to factors like the bluetongue virus and regulatory changes, countries like Poland and Germany are witnessing growth. According to ZuivelNL, the EU milk supply has grown by 1.1 percent in the first four months of this year, whereas the Netherlands’ supply has dropped by 1.3 percent. These opposing trends raise questions about supply management, market stability, and pricing mechanisms within Europe’s dairy industry.

Unraveling the Drop: Biological Strains and Regulatory Chains Impact Dutch Milk Supply

MonthMilk Supply (million kg)Change from Previous Year (%)
January 20241,100-1.2%
February 20241,050-1.0%
March 20241,200-0.9%
April 20241,180-1.5%
May 20241,150-1.6%

The decline in the supply of Dutch milk stems from biological challenges and regulatory constraints. Last year, the bluetongue virus outbreak in autumn significantly impacted livestock health, reducing milk yield. This effect is evident in the 1.6% drop in May 2023 and a 1.3% average decrease over the first five months of 2024. 

Compounding these biological issues are regulatory changes, specifically the phase-out of derogation, which historically allowed farmers to use higher manure levels to boost production. With stricter nitrogen emission and manure management rules now in place, the number of dairy cows per farm is capped, further limiting milk output. 

In summary, combining the bluetongue virus and regulatory shifts, such as the end of derogation, has led to a notable reduction in Dutch milk production.

Diverse Trends in EU Milk Supply: Poland’s Surge Amid Ireland’s Struggles

CountryMilk Supply Change (April 2024)
Poland+5%
Germany+0.6%
France0%
Ireland-8%

The European Union’s milk supply has seen a notable rise, with a 0.6% increase in April and a 1.1% growth over the year’s first four months. Poland’s impressive 5% increase and Germany’s slight uptick have significantly boosted the EU’s overall supply. However, Ireland struggles with an 8% decline, and France’s growth has stagnated. These contrasts highlight the complexities within the European dairy market.

Stability Amid Complexity: European Milk Prices Buoyed by Sustainability Initiatives and Bonuses

CompanyPrice in May (€ per 100 kg)Change (€ per 100 kg)Sustainability Premium (€ per 100 kg)
Milcobel44.100.000.78
Laiterie des Ardennes (LDA)44.10+0.500.49
DMK Deutsches Milchkontor eG44.10+0.510.50
Hochwald eG44.100.000.80
Arla44.10+0.452.44
Capsa Food44.10+0.06
Valio44.100.00
Savencia44.10-0.09
Danone44.10-0.03
Lactalis44.10-0.18
Sodiaal44.100.000.29
Saputo Dairy UK44.10+0.05
Dairygold44.10+1.08
Tirlan44.10+0.150.50
Kerry Agribusiness44.10-0.190.10
FrieslandCampina44.10+0.471.21
Emmi44.10-0.62
Fonterra44.10+0.32
United States class III44.10-0.29

Since January, European milk prices have remained stable, around 44 euros per 100 kg. In May, the average was 44.10 euros per 100 kg, a slight increase of 0.07 euros from April. This steadiness is due to sustainability premiums and bonuses, including rewards for participating in sustainability programs, GMO-free milk, and other environmentally friendly practices. Such incentives buffer producers from market fluctuations and contribute to the stability of milk prices.

Global Dairy Dynamics: Diverging Trends Highlight the EU’s Stable Milk Supply Amid Global Volatility

CountryApril 2024 Milk Supply Change (%)January-April 2024 Milk Supply Change (%)
Poland+5.0+3.8
Germany+0.8+1.1
France0.0+0.5
Ireland-8.0-6.5
Netherlands-1.6-1.3

In the global dairy market, trends vary widely among significant exporters. Australia has recently shown resilience with a 3% growth. Conversely, the United States and New Zealand faced declines, with the US seeing a slight decrease and New Zealand a more significant 4% drop

The situation is more severe in South America. Argentina’s milk production shrank by 16%, and Uruguay’s fell by 7% in April, highlighting regional challenges. In contrast, the combined volume of significant dairy exporters, including the EU, saw a modest 0.3% increase (0.35 billion kg) up to April 2024. These trends illustrate the diverse fortunes and impacts in the global dairy market.

Market Dichotomy: Butter Price Volatility Versus Skimmed Milk Powder’s Competitive Pressures

ProductDatePrice (€/100 kg)
Butter3/7/24670
Butter29/5/24668
Butteravg. 2023476
Skimmed Milk Powder3/7/24241
Skimmed Milk Powder29/5/24248
Skimmed Milk Powderavg. 2023242

The European dairy market paints a nuanced picture of butter and skimmed milk powder pricesButter prices saw significant volatility in early 2024, rising sharply from mid-May to early June before stabilizing due to unexpectedly cool summer temperatures reducing cream demand. This stabilization has introduced uncertainty into the butter market. 

Conversely, skimmed milk powder prices have been relatively stable but face competitive pressures from cheaper US and Oceania imports. Demand unpredictability, especially in Asian markets, has also contributed to minor price decreases through June, highlighting ongoing challenges in the market.

The Bottom Line

The European market presents a mix of trends as the Dutch milk supply declines due to biological and regulatory challenges. However, the EU sees growth, driven by Poland, while Ireland faces declines. European milk prices, buoyed by sustainability premiums and bonuses, remain stable amid global volatility. Globally, the EU’s stability contrasts with declines in New Zealand and Argentina. These contrasting trends underscore the potential for growth and the need for innovation and collaboration within the global dairy sector. 

The dairy sector is currently grappling with biological strains, regulatory burdens, and economic challenges, all impacting profitability and market consolidation. Smaller farms are particularly at risk. In this context, strategic adaptive measures and support systems are crucial. It’s a call to action for policymakers, stakeholders, and farmers to unite, using sustainability initiatives to counter economic strains and ensure food security. The industry’s resilience is evident, but proactive regulation, sustainability, and financial support are essential. A combined effort is needed to enhance dairy farming. This analysis underscores the need for innovation and collaboration within the global dairy sector.

Key Takeaways:

  • The Dutch milk supply has continued its downward trend, recording a 1.6 percent decrease in May 2024 as compared to May 2023, attributed to the bluetongue virus and changes in derogation policies.
  • Despite the Dutch decline, the overall milk supply in the European Union increased by 1.1 percent over the first four months of 2024, driven by significant growth in Poland and slight increases in Germany, while Ireland’s output fell sharply.
  • European milk prices have shown remarkable stability, averaging around 44 euros per 100 kg since January 2024, buoyed by various sustainability surcharges and bonuses across different countries and companies.
  • Globally, major dairy exporters illustrated mixed trends, with Australia’s supply growing, while Argentina and New Zealand experienced substantial declines.
  • The Dutch dairy product market exhibited volatility, notably in butter prices, while skimmed milk powder prices faced competitive pressures from cheaper US and Oceania products, leading to slight decreases in June.

Summary:

The Dutch dairy industry is experiencing a’milk lake’ due to a decline in production due to the bluetongue virus outbreak and regulatory changes. The EU’s milk supply has increased, with Poland and Germany contributing to the overall supply. Ireland and France are struggling with declines. Sustainability premiums and bonuses contribute to market stability and milk prices. Global dairy market trends vary among exporters, with Australia showing resilience with a 3% growth, while the US and New Zealand face declines. South America’s situation is more severe, with Argentina’s milk production shrinking by 16% and Uruguay’s falling by 7%. Policymakers, stakeholders, and farmers must unite to counter economic strains and enhance dairy farming.

Learn more:

Long-Term Impact of Heat Stress on Dairy Cattle: Beyond Milk Production to Fetal Health and Farm Sustainability

Explore how heat stress affects dairy cattle in more ways than just reducing milk production. Understand its impact on unborn calves and the overall health of the farm. How can we reduce these risks?

silhouette of animal in grass

Heat stress has long-term effects that are more severe as temperatures increase. Heat stress is more than just a nuisance in the dairy business; it also seriously affects other aspects of operations beyond milk production. In the United States, annual losses from heat-stressed dry cows top $1.5 billion; the broader consequences damage immunological function, reproductive health, and fetal development, jeopardizing the viability of dairy businesses.

Although heat stress affects milk output, its effect on fetal growth compromises future resilience and output. Not just financially but also ethically, reducing heat stress during the dry months guarantees the health and sustainability of successive generations of dairy cows.

The Multifaceted Economic Toll of Heat Stress in Dairy Farming 

CategoryEconomic Impact (Annual)
Milk Production Loss$900 million
Reproductive Health$320 million
Fetal Development$190 million
Immune Function$100 million
Other Related Losses$50 million
Total Economic Impact$1.56 billion

Heat stress’s financial effects on the dairy sector go well beyond the acute drop in milk output. Although the startling $1.5 billion yearly loss in the United States resulting from dry cows is noteworthy, it only addresses dairy farmers’ more general financial difficulties. Heat stress reduces reproductive efficiency, which lowers conception rates and increases calving intervals, therefore lowering the herd’s total production and profitability. Furthermore, decreased fetal development produces smaller calves with reduced birth weights, which increases veterinarian expenses and raises death rates.

Furthermore, heat-stressed cows’ compromised immune systems increase their vulnerability to illnesses such as mastitis, which calls for more frequent medical visits and increases treatment expenses. These health problems cause immediate costs and shorten the afflicted animals’ lifetime and output, therefore aggravating the economic load. The reduced capacity of heat-stressed cows to realize their genetic potential results in a long-term financial load as farmers have to spend more on maintaining herd health and performance.

Moreover, heat stress’s knock-on effects might upset the whole supply chain. Reduced milk supply reduces dairy products’ availability, influencing market stability and possibly pushing up costs. The combined influence of these elements emphasizes the crucial need to implement sensible heat-reducing techniques. Farmers may protect their financial interests by prioritizing their herd’s well-being, guaranteeing their activities’ continued profitability and sustainability.

Heat Stress in Dairy Cattle: Undermining Reproductive Health and Fetal Development 

Heat stress disrupts endocrine processes and compromises reproductive cycles, seriously affecting the reproductive health of dairy cows. Increased temperatures disrupt hormonal signals vital for ovulation, lowering conception rates and compromising effective fertilization and embryo implantation.

Heat stress also reduces udder growth, therefore reducing milk output and quality. Excessive heat changes blood flow and nutritional availability to udder tissues, reducing milk output and aggravating the financial losses experienced by dairy companies.

Heat stress also affects prenatal development; stressed cows often have smaller calves with compromised organ development. These long-term effects emphasize how urgently efficient heat-reducing techniques are needed to guarantee the health and survival of future generations within the herd.

Insidious Impacts of Heat Stress During Late Gestation: A Threat to Future Herd Productivity

Heat stress badly affects fetal growth in the latter trimester of pregnancy. This period is absolutely necessary for fast development and essential organ development. Reduced uteroplacental blood flow during mother heat stress causes smaller nutrition and oxygen availability, which lowers birth weights and organs. These shortcomings affect development long-term.

Less functioning and smaller immune organs, such as the thymus and spleen, increase the calf’s illness susceptibility. Besides, poor thermoregulation causes the calf to struggle with temperature fluctuations throughout its life. These problems stop the calf from realizing its full genetic potential by hindering its development and output.

Every incidence of slowed-down fetal development influences the future output of the herd. Over time, this results in lower milk output, more veterinary expenses, and higher morbidity and death rates. Therefore, farm sustainability is in jeopardy as the residual effects of heat stress progressively compromise the economic viability of dairy enterprises.

Maternal Heat Stress: A Silent Saboteur of Calf Immunity and Long-Term Viability 

Maternal heat stress during pregnancy has far-reaching effects, especially on the immune system of unborn calves. Higher prenatal temperatures impair the growing immune system, increasing susceptibility throughout life. The first significant checkpoint for a newborn’s immune system is the absorption of antibodies from colostrum, the first milk post-parturition. Heat-stressed moms generate infants with a much-reduced capacity to absorb these essential antibodies, which compromises start and raises vulnerability to illnesses. Reduced functioning from the beginning and weakened immune organs like the thymus and spleen aggravate the young animal’s difficulty in building strong immunological responses. These early difficulties constantly hinder reaching full genetic potential and contribute to farm success by endangering immediate survival and interfering with long-term health and output.

A Detrimental Cascade: Heat Stress and its Consequences on Fetal Growth and Immunological Development

Heat stress seriously alters the fetal nutrition supply, which results in undeveloped organs and reduced birthweights. Restricted blood flow to the uterus and placenta reduces the fetus’s supply of nutrients and oxygen. This deficiency reduces fetal development, producing smaller babies with reduced organ function.

The effect on immunological organs such as the thymus and spleen is particularly worrying. Crucially part of the immune system, these organs are sometimes smaller in calves born from heat-stressed cows. Important for T-cell generation, the thymus, and the spleen—key for blood filtration and building immunological responses—are compromised, reducing the calf’s lifetime capacity to fight infections. This compromised immune system increases disease sensitivity and reduces long-term health and productivity.

The Vicious Cycle of Heat Stress: Impaired Thermoregulation and its Lifelong Consequences

A calf’s capacity to control its body temperature is seriously disrupted by maternal heat stress, a result of which embryonic development of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis suffers. Rising prenatal temperatures impede this vital mechanism, which causes lifetime thermoregulation problems. Born from heat-stressed moms, calves often suffer from chronic conditions, including overheating, poor feed intake, and slowed development rates. As these animals lose their ability to control environmental stresses, their immediate survival post-birth and long-term production is threatened, jeopardizing their general health and farm performance.

From Economic Strategy to Moral Imperative: Addressing Heat Stress During the Dry Period in Dairy Farming 

Dealing with heat stress during dry times goes beyond just financial need; it is a great moral and financial need for the dairy business. Heat stress disrupts more than instantaneous milk production deficits. Among them are problems with reproductive health, poor fetal development, and decreased immune system—a whole costly load cascade. Ignoring these problems compromises not just present profitability but also sustainable dairy production.

Our obligations go beyond money. We must ensure dairy cattle are healthy, well-adjusted, and future-productive as their caregivers. During vital times like gestation and the dry phase, heat stress compromises the potential of future generations. It increases their susceptibility to ongoing health problems and lowers viability. By giving techniques to fight heat stress first priority, we protect our financial interests and maintain moral standards, thus assuring that dairy cattle flourish for the next generations.

The need—moral as much as financial—to reduce heat stress drives us to put strong plans into action. These steps may guarantee the lifetime, output, and resilience of dairy herds, thereby fostering sustainability and moral responsibility for future generations.

The Bottom Line

Deeply affecting dairy cows, heat stress affects not only milk output but also the immune system, reproductive health, and foetus development. These consequences compromise the herd’s future output and the financial feasibility of dairy farms. Reducing heat stress, particularly during the dry months, is crucial for protecting fetus health and guaranteeing the resilience of dairy farming businesses.

The long-term success of a farm depends on investments in calf health. Meeting Youngstock’s requirements will help them resist heat stress, avoid immunological problems, and increase the farm’s profitability and sustainability. Our moral and financial obligations are to give the wellbeing well-being of the next generation the first priority.

Dairy producers must implement sensible heat stress-reducing plans. These include maximizing barn conditions, guaranteeing enough water, and using technology to lower heat exposure. These actions will help us preserve our herds, increase output, and advance environmentally friendly dairy production for future generations.

Key Takeaways:

  • Heat stress disrupts normal udder development, impeding milk production directly.
  • Economic losses from heat stress exceed $1.5 billion annually for dry cows in the U.S.
  • Reproductive health and fetal growth are significantly compromised due to heat stress during gestation.
  • Maternal heat stress affects the calf’s ability to absorb antibodies from colostrum, weakening its immune system from birth.
  • Reduced fetal nutrient supply leads to lower birthweights and smaller immunological organs.
  • Heat-stressed calves struggle with body temperature regulation throughout their lives.
  • Addressing heat stress is not just an economic necessity but also a moral obligation for sustainable dairy farming.

Summary: 

Heat stress is a major issue in dairy farming, causing annual losses of $1.5 billion in the US. It affects milk production, reproductive health, fetal development, and immune function, threatening dairy businesses’ viability. Heat stress results in milk production losses of $900 million, reproductive health losses of $320 million, fetal development losses of $190 million, and immune function losses of $100 million. This reduces reproductive efficiency, increases fetal development, and increases medical costs. Heat-stressed cows’ compromised immune systems increase their vulnerability to illnesses like mastitis. The knock-on effects of heat stress can disrupt the entire supply chain, affecting market stability and potentially increasing costs.

Learn More:

For a comprehensive insight into the long-term consequences and effective prevention strategies, explore the following resources: 

Dairy Margin Watch June: Strong Class III Milk Prices Amid Surging Whey and Cheese Demand

Explore how robust Class III Milk prices and soaring whey and cheese demand influence dairy margins in June. What role will Mexico’s demand play in shaping future trends?

June experienced stable dairy margins, notably increasing during the spot period due to high Class III Milk prices. This rise provided much-needed support in an otherwise flat margin trend. The resilience in Class III Milk prices was crucial in maintaining market stability during the volatile spot period. While margins remained steady, the strong demand for Class III Milk underscores market forces and exciting potential growth areas for industry stakeholders.

Understanding the Forces Behind Rising Class III Milk Prices 

MonthClass III Milk Price (per cwt)Change from Previous Month
January$18.50+0.25
February$19.00+0.50
March$19.75+0.75
April$20.00+0.25
May$20.25+0.25
June$20.30+0.05

Dairy farmers and market analysts have noticed rising Class III milk prices. Strong cheese and whey demand are key drivers.

Cheese Demand: Mexico’s appetite for U.S. cheese has surged, reflected in record-setting exports. This strong demand directly impacts Class III milk prices since cheese production relies heavily on this milk.

Whey Demand: Whey is also seeing renewed interest. Tight whey powder inventories pushed prices to their highest since February, increasing Class III milk prices further. This 30% price spike underscores whey’s significant role in future milk contracts.

These factors and slower shipments to China and Southeast Asia have shifted focus to Mexico, bolstering demand and sustaining high-Class III milk prices. Understanding this helps you see the link between dairy product demand and milk pricing.

Navigating Recent Trends in the Whey Market 

MonthSpot Whey Price (per lb)Price Change (cents)
April 2023$0.37
May 2023$0.44+7
June 2023 (first half)$0.48+4

Let’s examine the recent trends in the whey market. Over the past two months, whey prices have surged by about 30%, or 11 cents, significantly impacting the dairy sector. 

This increase is primarily due to tighter whey powder inventories, highlighting how low stock levels push prices higher. On the demand side, renewed strength, especially from key markets, has also bolstered whey prices. 

The ripple effects of this price surge are evident in the Class III futures market, contributing to a notable gain of about 66 cents. This showcases whey’s importance in shaping Class III Milk prices and influencing dairy margins. 

Given the current scenario, it is imperative for those involved in the dairy industry, including producers and traders, to remain vigilant. A comprehensive understanding of these trends can significantly aid in navigating the market and making informed decisions.

The Unwavering Impact of Mexican Demand on U.S. Cheese Prices 

ProductApril 2022 (million pounds)April 2023 (million pounds)Change (%)
Total Dairy Exports to Mexico124.6142.914.7%
Cheese Exports to Mexico32.638.016.6%
Butter Production197.4207.85.3%
Cheese Production1,166.11,187.01.8%
Mozzarella Production383.6407.16.1%
Cheddar Production332.4303.8-8.6%

Cheese demand plays a pivotal role in the dairy market, mainly thanks to Mexico’s strong appetite for U.S. cheese, which has led to record-high prices. In April, cheese exports to Mexico hit 38 million pounds, highlighting this continued trend. 

This demand positively impacts not just cheese but the entire U.S. dairy sector. Higher cheese prices contribute to rising Class III Milk prices, offering stability to dairy margins even as shipments to markets like China and Southeast Asia slow down. 

It’s essential to remain aware of potential changes, such as economic fluctuations in Mexico, that could affect future demand. For now, Mexico’s consistent cheese demand supports strong U.S. dairy margins.

 U.S. dairy exports to Mexico surged in April, hitting 142.9 million pounds—up 18.3 million from last year. Cheese exports set a new record at 38 million pounds, surpassing the previous high in February. This highlights Mexico’s vital role in the U.S. dairy market, as exports to China and Southeast Asia slow. 

With 30% of U.S. dairy exports going to Mexico, their market’s demand significantly supports American dairy prices

In April, the U.S. shipped 142.9 million pounds of dairy products to Mexico, up 18.3 million from last year. This was the second-highest monthly export level on record. Cheese exports alone hit a record 38 million pounds, showing strong demand for U.S. dairy. 

Since early 2023, demand from China and Southeast Asia has decreased, but Mexico has helped fill the gap. This demand has been crucial in stabilizing prices and preventing a potential downturn. 

Mexican demand plays a vital role in U.S. dairy exports. As shipments to other regions slow, this strong market helps maintain prices despite external challenges.

Claudia Sheinbaum’s presidential win has raised questions about the Mexican Peso and future U.S. dairy exports. Analysts worry her socialist policies could weaken the Peso, which dropped 5% in two days, reaching its lowest since October 2023. This devaluation might make U.S. dairy products pricier for Mexican buyers, possibly reducing demand. With 30% of U.S. dairy exports going to Mexico, a prolonged weak Peso could impact the U.S. dairy market. Exporters may need to find new markets or tweak pricing to keep their foothold in Mexico.

April’s Dairy Production: Butter’s Rise and Cheese’s Mixed Signals

MonthPrice (cents/lb)
January250
February255
March260
April265
May270
June275

In April, butter output reached 207.8 million pounds, marking a 5.3% increase from the previous year. On the other hand, cheese production showed a mixed pattern. Total cheese output was up by 1.8%, reaching 1.187 billion pounds. However, within this category, mozzarella production surged by an impressive 6.1%. Cheddar cheese output saw a decline of 8.6% compared to last year.

Strategic Moves: Leveraging Historical Margins for Future Gains

Intelligent investors are extending coverage in deferred marketing periods to leverage strong margins. By locking in positions at or above the 90th percentile of the past decade, they’re ensuring stability and profitability despite market fluctuations. This proactive strategy, backed by historical data, helps make informed strategic decisions.

The Bottom Line

June’s Dairy Margin Watch highlights critical market drivers. Class III Milk prices remain high due to solid cheese demand and tighter whey powder supplies. Increased U.S. dairy exports to Mexico also play a crucial role despite potential economic concerns following recent political changes. April’s dairy production data shows a rise in butter output but mixed cheese production signals. 

Understanding these can help dairy producers make intelligent decisions to protect margins. Now is an excellent time to consider leveraging historically strong margins by extending coverage in deferred periods. Stay proactive and informed. 

For tailored strategies, consider subscribing to the CIH Margin Watch report. Visit www.cihmarginwatch.com

Key Takeaways:

Welcome to this month’s Dairy Margin Watch. Here are the key takeaways from the latest trends and developments shaping the dairy market: 

  • Class III Milk prices remain strong due to robust demand for cheese and whey.
  • CME spot whey prices have surged by 30% over the past two months, reaching their highest level since February.
  • U.S. dairy exports to Mexico saw a significant increase, with cheese exports setting new records.
  • Concerns arise over the potential impact of recent political changes in Mexico on the value of the Peso and subsequent dairy demand.
  • April’s dairy production statistics reveal a rise in butter output, but mixed signals for cheese production, particularly a decline in Cheddar output.
  • Strategic coverage in deferred marketing periods is crucial to leverage historically strong margins.

Summary: 

June’s dairy margins increased significantly due to high Class III Milk prices, which were crucial for maintaining market stability during the volatile spot period. Key drivers of rising milk prices include cheese demand and whey demand, with Mexico’s appetite for U.S. cheese leading to record-setting exports. Whey demand is also seeing renewed interest, with tight whey powder inventories pushing prices to their highest since February. Mexican demand plays a pivotal role in the dairy market, mainly due to Mexico’s strong appetite for U.S. cheese, leading to record-high prices. In April, cheese exports to Mexico reached 38 million pounds, highlighting this continued trend. However, Claudia Sheinbaum’s presidential win has raised questions about the Mexican Peso and future U.S. dairy exports, as analysts worry that her socialist policies could weaken the Peso, making U.S. dairy products pricier for Mexican buyers and potentially reducing demand. Understanding these factors can help dairy producers make intelligent decisions to protect margins and leverage historically strong margins by extending coverage in deferred periods.

Irish Farmers Urge Higher Milk Prices Amid Rising Costs and Market Pressures

Irish farmers demand higher milk prices to combat rising costs and market pressures. Can increased prices ensure the future of Ireland’s dairy sector?

Amidst the relentless financial pressures and unpredictable markets, Irish dairy farmers , with their unwavering determination, call for higher milk prices. Rising input costs, poor weather, and strict nitrates regulations have heavily burdened these farmers, reducing margins and threatening sustainability. 

The dairy industry , a cornerstone of Ireland’s economy, supports rural livelihoods and contributes significantly to the national economy through exports and jobs. Organizations like the Irish Farmers Association (IFA) and the Irish Creamery Milk Suppliers Association (ICMSA) are advocating for fair milk prices, recognizing the industry’s vital role.  

“We are at a critical juncture,” warned a representative from the IFA. “The current base milk prices are pushing us to the brink, especially with the surge in feed, fertilizer, and energy expenses. We need immediate relief.”

If these pressing issues are not promptly addressed, the dairy sector, a pillar of Ireland’s economy, could suffer a severe blow, forcing many farmers out of business. Addressing these challenges is not just important; it’s a matter of survival for Ireland’s dairy farmers.

As Irish dairy farmers grapple with the multifaceted challenges shaking their sector, one cannot overlook the stark figures that illustrate their plight. From declining production levels to stagnant milk prices, the data paints a clear picture of the adversities faced by those who form the backbone of Ireland’s dairy industry. 

YearTotal Milk Production (million liters)Base Milk Price (€/liter)Input Costs (€/liter)
201877000.340.25
201976000.320.26
202075000.310.27
202174000.300.29
202273000.290.30

The figures above starkly demonstrate the mounting financial pressure on Irish dairy farmers, who are facing higher input costs without a corresponding increase in milk prices, leading to a vicious cycle of dwindling margins and decreased production.

The Multifaceted Challenge Facing Irish Dairy Farmers: Navigating Declining Production and Stagnant Prices 

Irish dairy farmers face a significant challenge due to declining milk production and stagnant prices. Data from the Central Statistics Office (CSO) shows that milk volumes lag behind 2023 levels, creating pressure on farmers’ livelihoods. 

The Irish Creamery Milk Suppliers Association (ICMSA) is leading the charge for change. Despite a slight improvement in the Global Dairy Trade (GDT) index and the Ornua Purchase Price Index (PPI), current prices still need to be improved. The ICMSA calls for a base milk price of 45c/L to restore sector confidence. High input costs and adverse weather conditions compound this need. 

Stagnant prices and reduced production erode farmers’ margins, leading to tighter cash flows and difficulty managing costs. Stringent nitrate regulations and unpredictable weather patterns worsen this situation. 

Higher milk prices are essential for the long-term viability of the sector. Addressing these challenges can restore confidence, stabilize the market, and ensure future growth.

The Escalating Costs Squeezing Ireland’s Dairy Sector: A Perfect Storm of Financial Pressures 

Parameter20222023 (Projected)
Average Milk Price (per liter)€0.37€0.34
Total Milk Production (million liters)8,0007,800
Input Costs Increase (%)15%10%
Weather Impact on YieldModerateSevere
Nitrates Pressures Compliance Cost€50 million€60 million

Rising input costs are a significant burden on Irish dairy farmers. The feed cost has surged due to global supply chain disruptions and local shortages. Similarly, fertilizer prices have increased due to high demand and supply constraints. Additionally, fluctuating oil and gas prices have caused energy costs to soar, impacting transportation and machinery expenses. Rising labor costs, influenced by higher minimum wages and labor shortages, add further financial pressure. 

These escalating costs erode farmers’ slim margins, resulting in severe cash flow difficulties. Increased spending on essential inputs leaves farmers less financial flexibility for operational needs or investments in sustainability. Moreover, adverse weather conditions and strict nitrates regulations further strain their finances, threatening the viability of dairy farming in Ireland.

A Clarion Call for Financial Sustainability: Irish Dairy Farmers Advocate for Essential Base Milk Price Increase 

Irish dairy farmers are demanding an increase in the base milk price to at least 45 cents per liter, as the Irish Creamery Milk Suppliers Association (ICMSA) advocates. This increase is essential for several reasons. Rising input costs, volatile weather, and strict nitrates regulations have tightened farmers’ margins. Without a price hike, many face unsustainable cashflows and further declines in milk production. 

The call is more than a temporary plea; it’s crucial for restoring confidence in the sector. A higher base price would boost cash flow, allowing farmers to invest in resources and cover expenses adequately. Improved margins would help farmers withstand market pressures, ensuring a stable milk supply and fostering long-term growth and sustainability. 

Increasing the base milk price also benefits the broader dairy market. Returning the value realized from market improvements—such as the recent 1.7% rise in the Global Dairy Trade and the 1.1 cents per liter increase in the Ornua Purchase Price Index—to farmers, the entire supply chain gains. Enhanced farmer profitability strengthens rural economies and the dairy supply chain, benefiting processors, retailers, and consumers. Thus, increasing the base milk price is vital for fortifying Ireland’s dairy sector.

Complexities and Constraints: The Role of Milk Processors in Pricing Dynamics 

MonthGlobal Dairy Trade Index (GDT)Ornua Purchase Price Index (PPI)
January1,080108.9
February1,085109.5
March1,090110.1
April1,095110.7
May1,080108.4
June1,075107.8

Milk processors influence milk pricing by acting as intermediaries between dairy farmers and the market. They determine the base milk price, factoring in global market trends, domestic supply, and costs. Their pricing decisions significantly impact farmers’ incomes. 

Setting prices involves balancing market conditions indicated by the Global Dairy Trade (GDT) and the Ornua Purchase Price Index (PPI). The PPI recently showed a slight increase, reflecting a modest improvement. However, these gains do not always lead to higher payouts for farmers, as processors face financial pressures, including processing and distribution costs. 

The Irish Creamery Milk Suppliers Association (ICMSA) has called for a milk price of 45c/L to restore confidence in the sector, stressing the tension between farmers’ needs and processors’ financial stability. 

Although the Ornua PPI indicated an increase to 39.6c/L for May, this falls short of what farmers need. Processors argue that price increases must be sustainable in the market context and reflect real improvements in dairy product prices. 

Based on transparent market understanding, practical changes in milk pricing require coordinated efforts between farmers and processors.

The Ripple Effect of Higher Milk Prices: Balancing Immediate Relief with Long-Term Market Dynamics 

Increasing milk prices would offer immediate relief to dairy farmers, stabilizing cash flows and covering rising input costs. This support is crucial for maintaining production levels and preventing further declines in milk volumes. 

However, higher prices may reduce consumer demand for dairy products, as price-sensitive consumers might turn to cheaper alternatives. This could cause an initial oversupply, impacting processors and retailers. 

Higher milk prices encourage farmers to invest in advanced production technologies long-term, boosting efficiency and output. Consistent pricing could also attract new entrants, strengthening the supply base. 

Internationally, Ireland’s dairy competitiveness could be affected. Higher costs might make Irish products less competitive. Still, improved quality and supply could capture niche markets willing to pay premium prices. 

In conclusion, while a price increase is crucial for farmers, its broader impacts on supply, demand, and global market positioning must be carefully managed for long-term sustainability.

The Bottom Line

The Irish dairy sector faces several challenges, including declining milk production and stagnant prices, compounded by rising costs and environmental pressures. A key issue is the gap between what farmers earn for their milk and the increasing costs they face. It’s crucial for processors to fairly distribute market gains back to farmers to ease cash flow pressures faced by dairy producers

Increasing the base milk price to at least 45c/L, as suggested by the Irish Creamery Milk Suppliers Association (ICMSA), is essential to restore confidence among producers. Transparency and timely price adjustments by milk processors, in line with market trends like those shown by the Ornua Purchase Price Index (PPI) and Global Dairy Trade (GDT), are also critical. 

Tackling these issues calls for collaboration among processors, associations, and policymakers to support farmers. This would provide immediate financial relief and ensure the dairy industry’s resilient and prosperous future.

Key Takeaways:

  • Financial Strain: Irish dairy farmers are under considerable financial strain due to declining milk prices and rising input costs.
  • Production Decline: There is a tangible decline in milk production, impacting the overall market and supply chain.
  • Advocacy for Fair Pricing: Industry bodies like the Irish Farmers Association and the Irish Creamery Milk Suppliers Association are advocating for a base milk price increase to support farmers.
  • Regulatory Pressures: Stringent nitrate regulations and unpredictable weather patterns add to the challenges faced by dairy farmers.
  • Call for Sustainable Practices: Ensuring financial sustainability through fair pricing can enable farmers to invest in better resources and practices, ultimately benefiting the broader agricultural sector.

Summary: Irish dairy farmers are grappling with financial pressures and unpredictable markets, resulting in dwindling margins and decreased production. The dairy industry, a vital part of Ireland’s economy, supports rural livelihoods and contributes significantly to the national economy through exports and jobs. Organizations like the Irish Farmers Association and the Irish Creamery Milk Suppliers Association are advocating for fair milk prices to restore sector confidence. High input costs and adverse weather conditions further exacerbate the situation, with milk volumes lagging behind 2023 levels. Stringent nitrate regulations and unpredictable weather patterns exacerbate the situation. To restore confidence, the dairy sector is advocating for an increase in the base milk price to at least 45 cents per liter. This would boost cash flow, enable farmers to invest in resources, and ensure stable milk supply. The broader dairy market benefits from increased farmer profitability, strengthening rural economies and the dairy supply chain. However, the broader impacts on supply, demand, and global market positioning must be carefully managed for long-term sustainability.

Senators Demand USDA Restore Fair Milk Pricing to Combat Farmer Losses

Senators urge USDA to restore fair milk pricing to combat farmer losses. Can reverting to the old formula save dairy farmers from economic hardship? Learn more.

If you’re a dairy farmer, you’ve likely experienced the harsh financial realities of recent changes in the milk pricing formula. Since 2018, many in the dairy industry have been grappling to stay afloat. Revenue has plummeted, casting a shadow of uncertainty over the future. The issue originates from the alteration of the ‘higher of ‘ Class I pricing formula for fluid milk, resulting in over $1.1 billion in lost revenue for Class I skim milk over the last five years. 

“Ensuring fair compensation and stabilizing milk prices are critical for the survival of our dairy farmers and their communities,” said Senator Kirsten Gillibrand.

Senator Gillibrand, Chair of the Senate Agriculture Subcommittee on Livestock, Dairy, Poultry, Local Food Systems, and Food Safety and Security, has recognized the urgent situation. Leading a strong bipartisan effort with 13 other senators, she is urging the USDA to revert to the previous formula. This united push aims to repair the economic damage and stabilize the dairy market.

The Crucial Role of FMMO’s “Higher” Pricing Formula in Dairy Market Stability 

The Federal Milk Marketing Order (FMMO) system, created in 1937, aims to stabilize milk prices and ensure fair market conditions for dairy producers. This system sets minimum milk prices, categorized into four classes based on its use. Class I milk—for fluid consumption—traditionally commands the highest price due to its critical role in the consumer market. 

Previously, the “higher of” Class I pricing formula linked the price of Class I milk to the higher value between Class III (cheese) and Class IV (butter and powdered milk) prices. This approach aimed to ensure dairy farmers received fair compensation, reflecting market trends and minimizing economic volatility. 

However, the 2018 Farm Bill changed this formula. It introduced an averaging method, which calculates Class I prices based on the average of Class III and Class IV prices plus a fixed differential. This change aimed to simplify pricing and provide more predictability. Unfortunately, it led to significant revenue losses for dairy farmers, amounting to over $1.1 billion in lost Class I skim milk revenue over the past five years, causing widespread financial strain in the dairy farming community.

The Economic Ramifications of the Current Class I Pricing Formula 

The ongoing financial difficulties faced by dairy farmers have reached a critical point, prompting bipartisan action from the Senate. To emphasize the gravity of the issue, it’s essential to examine the direct impact of the altered Class I pricing formula on dairy farmers’ revenues over the past five years. 

YearRevenue Loss Due to Pricing Formula Change (in millions)
2018$250
2019$220
2020$200
2021$230
2022$200

Data Source: Senators’ Letter to USDA, outlining economic impacts on dairy farmers from 2018-2022 due to the Class I pricing formula change.

The current Class I pricing formula has had a significant and far-reaching economic impact on dairy farmers. Since the 2018 Farm Bill changed the formula, dairy producers have lost $1.1 billion in Class I skim milk revenue. This substantial financial loss has weakened many dairy operations, pushing some toward insolvency. The revised formula, which moves away from the ‘higher of ‘ pricing method, has introduced volatility that disrupts milk price stability. This instability hampers farmers’ budget planning and aggravates agricultural uncertainties. 

This pricing volatility affects the entire dairy supply chain, impacting feed suppliers, equipment manufacturers, and the rural economy. Farmers, who need stable pricing to manage costs and plans, face increased financial strain. As their revenue decreases, their ability to invest in farm improvements, employee wages, and community contributions diminishes. The instability caused by the current formula threatens the long-term viability of the American dairy industry, requiring urgent reform.

A Unified Appeal for Economic Justice in Dairy Farming

The senators’ letter to Secretary Tom Vilsack highlights the urgent need to revert to the “higher of” Class I pricing formula. They argue that the change made in the 2018 Farm Bill has caused a financial crisis, costing dairy farmers over $1.1 billion in lost revenue. The previous “higher” formula provided fair and predictable compensation, ensuring stability in the dairy sector. 

This bipartisan call to action, backed by influential senators like Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY), Roger Marshall (R-KS), and Bob Casey (D-PA), underscores the shared concern for the future of dairy farming and the broader economic impacts. The senators are urging the USDA to reinstate the ‘higher mover in upcoming policy updates, aligning with the Federal Milk Marketing Order system’s goal of stable milk pricing and adequate supply. 

The Far-Reaching Economic Impact of Dairy Pricing Instability 

Beyond affecting dairy farmers directly, the flawed Class I pricing formula has widespread economic impacts. Rural areas, heavily reliant on agriculture, suffer as decreased farmer incomes mean less local spending and reduced investments in nearby businesses such as feed suppliers and equipment dealers. 

This financial strain disrupts the food supply chain, affecting dairy processors and retailers who face unpredictable pricing, leading to higher consumer costs and potential shortages of dairy products. This volatility can erode consumer trust in the food supply. 

Reinstating the ‘higher of’ mover is crucial for stabilizing the dairy market. This formula supports a predictable economic environment by offering fair compensation reflecting market conditions. It aligns with the Federal Milk Marketing Order’s goal to ensure a steady supply of fluid milk, contributing to a resilient agricultural sector supporting local economies despite market changes.

Senators’ Urgent Call to Action: A Pivotal Moment for Fair Milk Pricing

The senators’ urgent plea for immediate action from the USDA underscores the critical necessity to revert to the ‘higher class I pricing formula, which has been instrumental in ensuring fair compensation for dairy producers. This call for change is of utmost importance as the USDA embarks on its modernization efforts of the Federal Milk Marketing Order (FMMO) system. The upcoming decisions made by the USDA are not just regulatory updates; they are pivotal moves that must align with the fundamental goals of promoting stable milk pricing and guaranteeing an adequate supply of fluid milk. The financial well-being of dairy farmers and the broader economic stability hinge on these critical reforms.

Key Takeaways:

  • Bipartisan Effort: Led by Senator Kirsten Gillibrand and supported by 13 other senators, the call to restore the “higher of” Class I pricing formula aims to address revenue losses and stabilize the dairy market.
  • Financial Impact: Since the 2018 Farm Bill modification of the pricing formula, dairy farmers have incurred over $1.1 billion in lost Class I skim milk revenue.
  • Economic Ramifications: The unstable pricing formula affects not only dairy farmers but the wider agricultural supply chain, including feed suppliers and equipment manufacturers.
  • Call to Action: The senators’ letter to Secretary Tom Vilsack emphasizes the urgent need for reform to safeguard the long-term viability of the American dairy industry.
  • Alignment with FMMO Goals: Reinstating the “higher of” pricing formula aligns with the Federal Milk Marketing Order’s objective of ensuring a steady milk supply and stable market conditions.

Summary: The dairy industry has been grappling with financial difficulties since 2018, with over $1.1 billion in lost revenue for Class I skim milk over the past five years. The change in the ‘higher of’ Class I pricing formula for fluid milk, which linked the price of Class I milk to the higher value between Class III and Class IV prices, has led to significant revenue losses for dairy farmers. The revised formula has disrupted milk price stability, hampering farmers’ budget planning and aggravated agricultural uncertainties. This volatility affects the entire dairy supply chain, impacting feed suppliers, equipment manufacturers, and the rural economy. Farmers, who require stable pricing to manage costs and plans, face increased financial strain as their revenue decreases. The instability caused by the current formula threatens the long-term viability of the American dairy industry, requiring urgent reform. Senators’ letter to Secretary Tom Vilsack emphasizes the urgent need to revert to the “higher of” Class I pricing formula, arguing that the change in the 2018 Farm Bill has caused a financial crisis, costing dairy farmers over $1.1 billion in lost revenue. Reinstating the ‘higher of’ formula is crucial for stabilizing the dairy market and aligning with the Federal Milk Marketing Order’s goal to ensure a steady supply of fluid milk, contributing to a resilient agricultural sector supporting local economies despite market changes.

Send this to a friend