Archive for international trade standards

Germany’s 60-Day FMD Miracle: How Europe’s Dairy Giant Beat the System

Germany regains FMD-free status in just 60 days while others wait YEARS. Miracle recovery or special treatment for Europe’s dairy giant?

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Germany has achieved an unprecedented recovery from its January 2025 foot-and-mouth disease outbreak, regaining its coveted “FMD-free without vaccination” status in just 60 days compared to typical recovery periods that last months or years. With China importing over 296,000 metric tons of German dairy products annually—nearly 25% of Germany’s non-EU exports—billions in trade hung in the balance, making this rapid reinstatement critically important for European dairy markets. The stark contrast with Botswana’s 601-day recovery timeline for a similar outbreak raises legitimate questions about potential disparities in international standards, despite acknowledged differences in veterinary infrastructure and surveillance capabilities. While Germany’s sophisticated containment response deserves recognition, this record-breaking recovery establishes a new benchmark that all dairy-exporting nations will likely demand, potentially reshaping global agricultural trade standards and disease management protocols.

KEY TAKEAWAYS

  • Unprecedented Recovery Timeline: Germany’s 60-day return to FMD-free status shatters previous recovery records, establishing a new benchmark that dairy-exporting nations worldwide will expect for themselves in future outbreaks.
  • Economic Protection Through Fast-Track Status: The rapid reinstatement prevented prolonged market exclusion, saving German dairy exports worth billions—demonstrating how disease status determinations directly impact producer profitability and market access.
  • Potential Double Standard in International Protocols: The dramatic disparity between Germany’s 60-day and Botswana’s 601-day recovery periods reveals potential inequities in how quickly different countries can regain market access, regardless of actual disease containment success.
  • Importance of Immediate Response Systems: Germany’s comprehensive containment strategy—including immediate culling within a 1km radius and sophisticated surveillance—highlights how investment in veterinary infrastructure directly translates to faster market recovery.
  • China’s Strategic Position in Dairy Trade: With China importing nearly 25% of Germany’s non-EU dairy exports, the article underscores China’s leverage in global dairy markets and the political aspects of agricultural trade relationships that extend beyond mere disease status.

When Germany confirmed foot-and-mouth disease in January, dairy experts predicted a year-long export nightmare. Yet, 60 days later, Germany has achieved what many thought impossible: regaining its coveted FMD-free status.

As of March 12, 2025, the World Organisation for Animal Health (WOAH) officially recognizes most of Germany as “foot-and-mouth disease-free without vaccination” – a lightning-fast recovery with significant implications for global dairy trade.

With China importing over 296,000 metric tons of German dairy products annually – nearly 25% of Germany’s non-EU exports – billions in trade hang in the balance.

This remarkable speed has The Bullvine asking the questions no mainstream dairy publication dares to: What does this record-breaking recovery mean for the global playing field? And are all countries held to the same standards when FMD strikes?

60 DAYS TO FREEDOM: GERMANY’S FMD RECOVERY SHATTERS RECORDS

When water buffaloes started dying on a Brandenburg farm in early January 2025, it marked Germany’s first brush with foot-and-mouth disease in nearly four decades.

By January 10th, German authorities had confirmed the worst: FMD had returned to one of Europe’s dairy powerhouses. The standard protocol suggested Germany faced at least a year of export restrictions, quarantines, and market turmoil.

Yet here we are, just 60 days later, with the World Organisation for Animal Health officially blessing most of Germany with “foot-and-mouth disease-free without vaccination” status.

Let that sink in, dairy farmers. Sixty. Days.

The speed at which Germany navigated from confirmed outbreak to official disease-free status is extraordinary. While other countries have waited months or years for similar recognition, Germany’s timeline represents one of the fastest recoveries in recent FMD history.

![Timeline comparison chart showing Germany’s 60-day recovery versus historical FMD recovery periods in other countries – image recommended]

DateEventSignificance
January 9, 2025Suspension of Germany’s “FMD free where vaccination is not practised” statusOfficial loss of disease-free status by WOAH
January 10, 2025Official notification of FMD in water buffalo in BrandenburgFirst German FMD case since 1988
January 13, 2025EU Commission adopts emergency measuresFormal EU-level response activated
February 11, 2025Protection zone lifted, becoming part of surveillance zoneFirst easing of restrictions
March 7, 2025China eases restrictions on heat-treated dairy productsPartial reopening of crucial export market
March 12, 2025Germany regains “FMD-free without vaccination” status for most regionsJust 60 days from outbreak to recovery
April 11, 2025Projected end of containment zone restrictionsFinal step in complete recovery

“The official confirmation by the WOAH is a crucial basis for our discussions with third countries and benefits exports.” – Federal Agriculture Minister Cem Özdemir

Federal Agriculture Minister Cem Özdemir couldn’t contain his excitement, declaring, “The official confirmation by the WOAH is a crucial basis for our discussions with third countries and benefits exports.”

Translation: German dairy products will flow back into lucrative international markets, while farmers in other countries with similar outbreaks typically face much more extended recovery periods.

The minister’s confidence that this status “sends a clear signal to our trading partners” reveals how significant this rapid recovery is for German agricultural exports.

Dr. Karin Schmidt, Director of the European Dairy Association’s Trade Division, notes the significance for industry stakeholders: “This rapid reinstatement of Germany’s disease-free status demonstrates the effectiveness of EU veterinary protocols, but also raises important questions about global standards consistency. Our members welcome the quick recovery while recognizing that different regions may face challenges in containing similar outbreaks.”

For dairy producers worldwide, this sets a precedent worth watching closely. FMD typically decimates milk production, with infected cows experiencing painful blisters in the mouth and on teats. This leads to dramatic drops in milk yield and long-term productivity impacts.

The disease’s highly contagious nature means a single case can threaten an entire industry, so Germany’s ability to contain and eliminate the threat so quickly deserves admiration and scrutiny.

![Clinical presentation of FMD in dairy cattle showing characteristic lesions on teats and mouth – image recommended]

MYSTERY VIRUS: HOW DID TURKISH FMD REACH GERMANY’S HEARTLAND?

German authorities have identified the culprit behind the outbreak as FMD serotype O. Genetic analysis links it most closely to a strain from Türkiye in December 2024.

This viral variant was previously documented in Iran, India, and Nepal, suggesting complex international transmission pathways that breached Europe’s biosecurity defenses.

The FMD virus found in Germany matched a strain from Türkiye in December 2024 – the same viral lineage previously documented in Iran, India, and Nepal. How did it travel 2,500 kilometers undetected to reach Europe’s dairy powerhouse?

The outbreak occurred on an organic farm in the Märkisch-Oderland district between Berlin and the Polish border. According to Dr. Ralph Bötticher from the veterinary office, the infected producer operated in the organic sector, did not purchase feed, used only his hay, and managed a landscape conservation area.

These circumstances make the infection pathway particularly puzzling, as the typical risk factors associated with feed imports or animal movements seem absent.

The biosecurity breach that allowed this virus to reach the heart of Europe after nearly four decades of absence raises essential questions about the effectiveness of current preventative measures.

Three water buffaloes died from the infection, with the remaining 11 animals on the farm culled immediately as part of containment protocols. These water buffaloes were not kept for dairy production, but the implications for European dairy farmers were immediate and severe.

When FMD strikes, the impact on dairy operations extends beyond the infected herd. The virus spreads rapidly through aerosols, direct contact, and contaminated equipment, putting every dairy farm within kilometers at risk.

For modern high-producing dairy herds, an FMD outbreak typically causes 80% drops in milk production almost overnight – a devastating blow that can persist for months, even in recovering animals.

GERMAN EFFICIENCY: INSIDE THE RAPID RESPONSE THAT SAVED BILLIONS

German authorities implemented textbook emergency response procedures immediately upon suspicion of FMD. Beyond culling the affected herd, officials established a provisional restricted zone consisting of a protection zone with a minimum 3 km radius and a surveillance zone extending at least 10 km from the outbreak site.

All susceptible animals within 1 km of the infected farm were culled, including 170 pigs on a nearby farm in Barnim district.

The response extended to a second location of the infected farm, 18 km away in the Oder-Spree district, where 55 goats, sheep, and three cattle were culled as a precaution despite showing no symptoms.

Transportation restrictions were immediately imposed throughout Brandenburg state and later extended to include Berlin, effectively halting the movement of cattle, pigs, sheep, goats, and camelids for at least 72 hours.

All susceptible animals within 1 km of the infected farm were immediately culled, including 170 pigs on a nearby farm in Barnim district that showed no signs of infection. Germany took no chances with its export reputation at stake.

Even Berlin’s massive agricultural fair, “Grüne Woche” (Green Week), felt the impact, with organizers forced to exclude all cloven-hoofed animals.

This comprehensive approach to containment demonstrates the seriousness with which German authorities approached the outbreak – and helps explain how they managed to prevent its spread beyond the initial case.

Professor Thomas Weber, a veterinary epidemiologist at Berlin’s Free University, explains: “Germany’s response leveraged decades of emergency preparedness plans, sophisticated laboratory diagnostics, and immediate access to resources. Combined with the fortunate circumstance of early detection in a relatively isolated location, these advantages created optimal conditions for rapid containment that may not be replicable in all countries or circumstances.”

A containment zone with a 6 km radius remains under restrictions until at least April 11, 2025, with ongoing monitoring of FMD-susceptible animals. While most of Germany has regained its disease-free status, efforts continue to achieve the same designation for this final restricted area.

GLOBAL TRADE SHOCK: THE RUSH TO REOPEN MARKETS FOR GERMAN DAIRY

The international response to Germany’s FMD outbreak was swift and potentially devastating for German agricultural exports. South Korea immediately banned the import of German pork and ordered quarantine and testing of approximately 360 tonnes of German pork imported since December 27.

This rapid reaction highlights the economic stakes for major agricultural exporters when disease strikes.

CountryResponse to German FMD OutbreakAffected German Exports
ChinaTemporary ban, partial easing on heat-treated products (March 7)296,000 metric tons of dairy annually (24.9% of non-EU exports)
South KoreaImmediate ban on German pork; quarantine of ~360 tonnes of importsPork and other animal products
United KingdomImport restrictions on German animal productsLivestock, meat, and dairy requiring FMD-free certification
NetherlandsSuspended operations at 125 farms with German calvesLive animal trade (3,600 calves since December 1)
JapanImport restrictions on cloven-hoofed animals and productsMeat, dairy, and other animal products
SingaporeTemporary import restrictionsAnimal products requiring disease-free certification
BrazilTemporary suspension of German animal product importsMeat, dairy, and genetic materials

With China importing over 296,000 metric tons of German dairy products annually – nearly 25% of Germany’s non-EU exports – billions in trade hung in the balance. Every day of disease-free status restoration meant millions saved.

Neighboring Netherlands took no chances, suspending operations at 125 farms that had imported calves from Brandenburg within the previous weeks. Approximately 3,600 calves had been imported from Brandenburg to the Netherlands since December 1, creating significant concern about potential spread.

For dairy farmers, these trade disruptions represent the hidden cost of animal disease outbreaks. While the virus may be contained, the economic impact ripples through the market as importing countries implement precautionary bans.

With China importing over 296,000 metric tons of German milk and dairy products annually – representing nearly 25% of Germany’s dairy exports beyond the EU – the economic stakes for rapid recovery could not be higher.

The lightning-fast restoration of Germany’s FMD-free status will accelerate the normalization of these trade relationships, allowing German dairy products to regain access to crucial export markets far sooner than historical precedent would suggest.

For German dairy farmers, this represents an economic lifeline that producers in other countries with longer recovery timelines can only envy.

DOUBLE STANDARD? EXAMINING GLOBAL FMD RECOVERY TIMELINES

Germany’s remarkably swift return to FMD-free status raises essential questions about international standards and expectations for disease recovery.

The World Organisation for Animal Health (WOAH) procedures for regaining disease-free status involve rigorous documentation, surveillance, and verification – processes that typically extend for months or even years in many countries experiencing FMD outbreaks.

Recovery AspectGermany (2025)Botswana Zone 6b (2022-2024)
Initial outbreak dateJanuary 10, 2025August 18, 2022
Animal type affectedWater buffaloCattle
Containment zone establishedImmediatelyBy November 28, 2022
Status recovery outside containmentMarch 12, 2025 (60 days)March 3, 2023 (197 days)
Full zone recovery including containmentNot yet (projected April 11, 2025)April 10, 2024 (601 days)
Economic classificationHigh-income developed economyUpper-middle-income developing economy

Botswana waited 601 days to regain FMD-free status after its 2022 outbreak, while Germany waited just 60 days. The same disease, the same international organization, dramatically different timelines—coincidence?

For context, consider Botswana’s experience: After an FMD outbreak in August 2022, a containment zone within Zone 6b was established, but the country didn’t regain FMD-free status for this zone until April 10, 2024 – over 601 days later.

This starkly contrasts Germany’s 60-day timeline, raising questions about whether all countries face the same recovery processes.

It’s important to acknowledge that several legitimate factors could influence recovery timelines. Countries differ significantly in their veterinary infrastructure, disease surveillance capabilities, regulatory systems, and resources available for emergency response. Germany’s sophisticated animal tracking systems, extensive laboratory networks, and substantial emergency response budget created favorable conditions for rapid containment.

Dr. Alejandro Martínez, former WOAH regional advisor for South America, offers the perspective: “Recovery timelines can vary dramatically based on a country’s surveillance capacity, the geographic scope of an outbreak, and local farming practices. Germany’s significant investment in veterinary infrastructure and its highly regulated farming sector likely contributed to its rapid recovery – though the speed remains notable even accounting for these advantages.”

The disparate timelines still highlight important questions about global equity in animal disease management. Are developing nations with limited resources facing longer verification processes? Does Germany’s sophisticated veterinary infrastructure fully explain such an accelerated timeline? What can be learned from Germany’s experience that might benefit other dairy-producing regions?

The answer matters tremendously for dairy farmers worldwide. FMD outbreaks represent existential threats to export markets and domestic production, with lasting consequences for farm profitability and sustainability.

If Germany’s 60-day recovery becomes the new benchmark, veterinary authorities worldwide must examine how this standard can be achieved across diverse agricultural systems and economic contexts.

WHAT GERMAN DAIRY FARMERS NEED TO KNOW

Germany’s swift containment of FMD and rapid restoration of disease-free status demonstrates the effectiveness of modern veterinary emergency response systems and the critical importance of immediate action when highly contagious animal diseases appear.

The ability to limit the outbreak to a single case and prevent wider spread throughout Europe represents a genuine public health achievement worthy of recognition.

At the same time, the unprecedented speed of Germany’s recovery timeline raises essential questions about global standards and equity in international agricultural trade.

The 60-day path from outbreak to disease-free certification sets a new precedent that all dairy-exporting nations will watch closely – and potentially demand themselves when facing similar challenges.

For dairy producers worldwide, Germany’s experience offers both reassurance and caution. When implemented immediately and comprehensively, modern containment protocols can effectively stop even highly contagious diseases like FMD.

Yet the economic disruption of even brief trade restrictions highlights the vulnerability of export-dependent agricultural sectors to animal disease threats.

As Germany’s final containment zone moves toward FMD-free status in the coming weeks, the global dairy industry would be wise to study this case closely.

The lessons learned –effective disease management and navigating the international regulatory landscape – may prove invaluable when the next inevitable disease challenge emerges.

In a globally connected agricultural economy, disease threats respect no borders – but Germany’s response demonstrates that with proper protocols and decisive action, even the most feared livestock diseases can be contained and defeated in record time.

Germany’s unprecedented 60-day recovery from FMD creates a new benchmark that every dairy-exporting nation will demand for themselves. The question is whether WOAH will apply similar timelines for all countries facing future outbreaks, regardless of economic status or political influence.

LEARN MORE:

Join the Revolution!

Join over 30,000 successful dairy professionals who rely on Bullvine Daily for their competitive edge. Delivered directly to your inbox each week, our exclusive industry insights help you make smarter decisions while saving precious hours every week. Never miss critical updates on milk production trends, breakthrough technologies, and profit-boosting strategies that top producers are already implementing. Subscribe now to transform your dairy operation’s efficiency and profitability—your future success is just one click away.

NewsSubscribe
First
Last
Consent

EU-China Dairy Trade Dispute Intensifies: What It Means for Global Markets

Curious about the EU-China dairy trade dispute and its global impact? Find out how this conflict could reshape the dairy industry.

Summary: In a significant escalation of international trade tensions, China has launched an anti-subsidy investigation into European Union (EU) dairy exports, igniting global concerns. The probe, announced by China’s Ministry of Commerce, aims to scrutinize subsidies provided to EU dairy farmers, suspecting these financial supports have unfairly bolstered the competitiveness of EU dairy products in the Chinese market. This move is perceived as a retaliatory action following the EU’s tariffs on Chinese electric vehicles. The investigation, set to span over a year, will examine imports dating back to early 2023, potentially resulting in substantial tariffs or restrictions on European dairy products entering China. The EU-China dairy trade dispute is rooted in the complex global commerce network and regulatory procedures, focusing on major European exports like fresh cheese, milk, and cream and examining 20 subsidy schemes. European organizations like FrieslandCampina and Dairy Industry Ireland collaborate with investigating agencies to demonstrate compliance with international trade standards. If the charges are confirmed, EU dairy imports may face severe taxes or limitations, impacting European farmers and altering global trade dynamics. Major dairy exporters like New Zealand and the United States also stand to be affected. European dairy associations, such as Eucolait and Copa Cogeca, are calling for assistance measures to support European farmers amid this looming trade conflict.

  • China initiates an anti-subsidy probe into EU dairy exports, citing unfair competitive advantages due to subsidies.
  • The investigation could lead to significant tariffs or restrictions on EU dairy products entering China.
  • The probe is seen as a retaliatory measure following the EU’s tariffs on Chinese electric vehicles.
  • Investigation covers key dairy products like fresh cheese, milk, and cream, examining 20 different subsidy schemes.
  • European dairy organizations, including FrieslandCampina and Dairy Industry Ireland, are working to prove compliance with international trade rules.
  • The outcome of the probe may substantially impact European dairy farmers and shift global trade dynamics.
  • New Zealand and the United States, major dairy exporters to China, might also feel the repercussions.
  • European associations such as Eucolait and Copa Cogeca are urging for measures to support farmers during this trade dispute.
EU-China dairy trade dispute, Chinese Ministry of Commerce, improper subsidies, European dairy producers, global commerce network, regulatory procedures, state subsidies, unfair edge, European market, major European exports, dairy products, EU's Common Agricultural Policy (CAP), potential losses, Irish dairy exports, investigating agencies, international trade standards, Chinese inquiry, fresh cheese, milk, cream, subsidy schemes, severe taxes, limitations, European farmers, global trade relations, New Zealand, United States, market share, supply chain, price volatility, AHDB, powder prices, global production, pricing plans, larger-scale precedent, European dairy associations, Eucolait, Copa Cogeca, labor conflict, assistance measures, adverse effects, local production, self-sufficiency, market share, European dairy farmers, new markets.

The EU-China dairy trade battle is rapidly escalating, and it’s about more than just milk and cheese. What is really at stake here? According to Eucolait, the European umbrella group for the dairy sector, ‘For many years now, the European Union has proven to be a reliable supplier of high-quality dairy products and ingredients to the Chinese market.’ It is alarming that dairy will be sacrificed in an industrial dispute over electric automobiles. The European Commission should urgently and decisively act to resolve this trade dispute. The need for a swift resolution is paramount. Let’s investigate the specifics and understand how this conflict will impact global markets.

Background: The Catalyst for Conflict 

The Chinese Ministry of Commerce has probed potential improper subsidies for European dairy producers. This measure primarily avenges the EU’s levies on Chinese electric automobiles. What is the true story behind these tit-for-tat measures?

The conflict is rooted in the complex global commerce network and regulatory procedures. Earlier this year, the European Commission placed duties on imported electric cars from China, citing worries over state subsidies that allegedly provided Chinese manufacturers an unfair edge in the European market. In response, China focuses on major European exports such as dairy products, which are heavily subsidized by the EU’s Common Agricultural Policy (CAP).

This growing situation highlights the giant geopolitical chess game in which big economies use trade policy as instruments of influence. Chinese authorities claim that EU subsidies under different CAP programs, such as critical income assistance and incentives for young farmers, create an unfair playing field for domestic dairy producers. On the other hand, the EU believes that its subsidies are entirely compliant with World Trade Organization (WTO) standards, characterizing China’s measures as excessive and politically motivated.

The stakes are enormous, with potential losses well beyond the sectors directly involved. For instance, Irish dairy exports to China were €426 million (US$487 million) in 2023, with an estimated €46 million at risk due to the current investigation. Organizations such as FrieslandCampina and Dairy Industry Ireland are ready to collaborate with investigating agencies to demonstrate compliance with international trade standards. The gravity of these potential losses underscores the need for swift resolution.

This disagreement highlights an important point: the global marketplace is always susceptible to the ebb and flow of international politics and policy choices. Despite its isolated character, the dairy industry is now embroiled in a more significant economic battle between two economic behemoths, highlighting the interwoven nature of contemporary commerce.

The Stakes: What’s Under Investigation? 

The Chinese inquiry targets dairy products, including fresh cheese, milk, and cream. It looks at 20 subsidy schemes that give EU dairy an unfair edge. How may this affect the global dairy market?

First, if the inquiry confirms the charges, EU dairy imports may face severe taxes or limitations. This would not just hurt European farmers but also change global trade relations. Key exporters like New Zealand and the United States may embrace the chance to boost their market share in China.

Furthermore, interruptions in the supply chain might cause price volatility. For example, the UK’s AHDB has said that rising milk output had already dragged down powder prices. Further limitations might worsen the trend, affecting global production and pricing plans.

This investigation might create a larger-scale precedent, prompting other governments to study subsidies and trade practices more closely. The European Commission’s challenging approach to protecting its policies and sectors may result in comparable reprisals, culminating in a more significant trade battle.

This probe is more than just a bilateral disagreement; it can affect global dairy markets, altering everything from price to international trade ties. How the EU and China handle this will influence the industry’s environment for years.

Industry Reactions: Voices From the Field

European dairy associations, such as Eucolait and Copa Cogeca, are outraged. They say the dairy industry is unjustly pulled into an unrelated labor conflict. What are their worries, and how do they intend to respond? Let’s look at their opinions.

Eucolait, the European dairy industry’s umbrella body, vigorously opposed the inquiry. They argue, “It is unjust that dairy will be sacrificed in an industrial fight over electric automobiles. The European Commission should do all it can to resolve this trade dispute as soon as possible [source]. Their biggest worry is the impact such investigations may have on the global dairy industry, possibly influencing pricing and trading routes.

In a social media post, Copa Cogeca shared similar sentiments: “This further escalation in the EU-China trade relationship and the continuous impact on our sector is very worrying.” They emphasize that European dairy farmers and agricultural cooperatives produce and export in complete compliance with EU and WTO standards. The association cautions against what they see as an unjustified challenge to the EU’s Common Agriculture Policy (CAP) and calls for a strong reaction from the European Commission to protect the industry’s interests.

These organizations are actively advocating for speedy and decisive action. Eucolait has encouraged EU officials to prioritize diplomatic resolution of the dairy trade problem, highlighting the historical significance of EU-China trade ties. Meanwhile, Copa Cogeca calls for extensive assistance measures to mitigate any adverse effects on European farmers throughout the probe.

Market Impact: Shifting Trade Dynamics 

China has traditionally been a major importer of EU dairy goods. Nonetheless, recent statistics show a significant decrease in these imports owing to increasing local production and a goal for self-sufficiency. This current probe into EU dairy subsidies may accelerate this trend, possibly reshaping global trade patterns.

The inquiry may encourage Chinese purchasers to seek dairy goods from non-EU suppliers, such as New Zealand, which now accounts for 51% of China’s dairy imports. Countries like the United States and other non-EU territories may experience an increase in their export quantities to China.

This investigation might result in a loss of market share for the EU, requiring European dairy farmers to seek new markets or strengthen partnerships with current ones. This transition might influence global supply chains, boosting competitiveness among dairy producers.

On the price front, the study might increase market volatility. Reduced demand from China may result in an excess of dairy products in the EU, putting downward pressure on pricing inside Europe. In contrast, nations that gain from filling the Chinese market vacuum may see price hikes owing to increased demand.

These changes may result in worldwide fluctuations in dairy product pricing for consumers and merchants. Market players must remain adaptable and sensitive to changing trade dynamics to reduce risks and capitalize on new possibilities.

As this inquiry progresses, the global dairy business confronts uncertainty and possible disruption, highlighting the interconnectedness of international commerce and the consequences of governmental choices.

Global Players: Who Stands to Gain or Lose? 

New Zealand and the United States are critical participants in China’s dairy import sector, with shares of 51% and 13%, respectively. With the European Union under examination, these nations may perceive an opportunity to increase their market presence. Could this move usher in a new era for the global dairy trade?

Any interruption in EU dairy imports might increase New Zealand’s export potential. According to Rabobank, China’s milk output will grow by 3.2% in 2024. However, this does not eliminate the demand for imported dairy products, exceptionally high-quality and specialized commodities [Rabobank Report 2024].

The United States, now China’s second-largest dairy exporter, may gain from the EU’s prospective trade restrictions. However, difficulties in trade dynamics, such as extra tariffs, logistical hurdles, and geopolitical conflicts, may impact how much of this market share can be successfully captured.

On the other hand, if channeled to different markets to avoid additional Chinese tariffs, an abundance of dairy goods from the EU might drive down world prices. According to the UK’s Agriculture and Horticulture Development Board (AHDB), China’s drop in powder imports has already impacted global markets [AHDB Report, 2024].

Ultimately, the global dairy trading picture might change dramatically. Nations such as New Zealand and the United States may benefit in the short term. Still, long-term stability will be determined by how international markets respond to these new trade dynamics.

EU’s Stand: Defending the Dairy Sector 

The European Commission has pledged to safeguard its dairy sector and maintain WTO compliance. But how successful will these methods be in combating China’s investigation? The EU’s case is based on establishing that its subsidies under the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) and other national programs conform with international trade regulations. Furthermore, working with Chinese officials is critical to mitigating the damage.

Olof Gill, a Commission spokeswoman, said that the EU would “follow the proceeding very closely” and “intervene as appropriate” to preserve its interests. This aggressive attitude signals a strong defense, but the controversial nature of the investigation and prior trade friction may hamper settlement attempts. The EU intends to negotiate this complicated trade issue by preserving openness and open conversation while avoiding aggravating tensions.

The Bottom Line

This issue is more than simply a commercial conflict; it reflects deeper geopolitical concerns and emphasizes the interconnectedness of global commerce. Actions in one industry, such as electric cars, may have far-reaching consequences in other sectors, such as dairy. It also emphasizes the strategic use of trade instruments as leverage in more significant geopolitical issues and the fundamental need to adhere to international trade laws. As the situation evolves, firms, governments, and analysts must adjust to a world where trade policy plays a critical part in geopolitical strategy, possibly dictating future global trade dynamics.

Learn more:

Join the Revolution!

Bullvine Daily is your essential e-zine for staying ahead in the dairy industry. With over 30,000 subscribers, we bring you the week’s top news, helping you manage tasks efficiently. Stay informed about milk production, tech adoption, and more, so you can concentrate on your dairy operations. 

NewsSubscribe
First
Last
Consent
Send this to a friend