Archive for Holstein

How Colostrum Quantity Impacts Dairy Calf Health: Findings from Holstein and Crossbred Calves

Find out how much colostrum impacts calf health. Are Holstein or crossbreds better off? See the surprising results that might change your farm practices.

Summary: This article explores the impacts of colostrum quantity on calf health and immune system development, comparing Holstein and Holstein × Angus breeds. The study used two different colostrum replacer treatments: a low quantity providing 2.5 g of IgG/kg and a high quantity providing 5.0 g of IgG/kg. While breed had no significant effect on overall health or lymphocyte populations, the amount of colostrum did influence immune cell profiles. HI calves showed tendencies for higher proportions of certain B cells, suggesting that increased colostrum intake in early life is beneficial for immune development. The article emphasizes the importance of colostrum management over breed differences for improving calf health.

  • Higher colostrum intake leads to better immune cell profiles in calves.
  • Breed differences (Holstein vs. Holstein × Angus) had no significant impact on overall calf health or lymphocyte populations.
  • HI calves had higher proportions of certain B cells, indicating enhanced immune development.
  • Effective colostrum management is crucial for improving calf health, regardless of breed.
  • The study highlights the importance of prioritizing colostrum quality and quantity over breed selection.
colostrum, first milk, mother cow, newborn calves, immunoglobulins, vital nutrients, growth factors, immune system, protein, fat, vitamins, minerals, energy boost, study, breed, colostrum quantity, health, lymphocyte profiles, Holstein, crossbred calves, rearing phase, IgM+ B lymphocytes, CD21, CD32, immunological response, colostrum replacer, LOW diet, immune system development, infections, lymphocyte composition, long-term health consequences, genetic predispositions, dietary therapies, colostrum quantity, calf health, immunity, genetic predispositions, dietary therapies, 12 hours, birth, individual calves, required amount, quality control, IgG concentration, health checks, manage issues early.

The initial few hours of a calf’s existence may influence its future health. It all starts with colostrum, the first milk the mother makes after giving birth. This nutrient-dense material is more than simply a meal; it is the primary defense for newborn calves, shielding them from many infections. Colostrum is like liquid gold for newborn calves. It contains immunoglobulins, vital nutrients, and growth factors necessary for developing a robust immune system. But how much colostrum is sufficient? Does the calf’s breed make a difference? These questions are essential for managing your dairy farm effectively. Subsequent research of these same concerns looked at how much colostrum and which breeds affected the health and lymphocyte profiles of Holstein and crossbred calves. The results may surprise you and provide fresh insights into improving the health of your herd.

Colostrum: The Supercharged First Meal Every Calf Needs 

Imagine colostrum as a newborn calf’s first and most important meal. Colostrum is a nutrient-dense, creamy material the mother cow produces before and after giving birth.

Think of it as a natural shield. When a calf is born, its immune system is like a blank slate, making it susceptible to infections and illnesses. Colostrum acts like a superhero, supplying crucial immunoglobulins—think of them as tiny warriors who protect the calf’s body immediately. IgG plays a vital role because it forms the majority of immunoglobulins and helps the calf fight against possible infections.

In addition, colostrum is high in protein, fat, vitamins, and minerals. It’s like giving the calf an immediate energy boost, a jumpstart on their existence. This nutritious foundation is critical to their growth and development. Without this initial injection of colostrum, calves are substantially more vulnerable to diseases and developmental setbacks, as if they were left without armor on a battlefield.

In summary, colostrum is more than simply a calf’s first meal; it is its lifeblood. Making sure kids receive enough of this precious nectar in their first few hours of existence is more than a chore; it’s a mission. It’s the finest foundation kids can have for a healthy and prosperous future, and it’s a duty we must all accept.

How Much Colostrum is Enough? A Deep Dive into Calf Health and Immunity

M. Kovacs*, H. McCarthy, T. Chaplain, L. R. Cangiano, D. L. Renaud, and M. A. Steele conducted the study “Effects of breed and colostrum quantity on health and lymphocyte populations in the blood of Holstein and crossbred calves” to investigate the impact of breed and colostrum quantity on the health and lymphocyte profiles in the blood of dairy calves during their rearing phase. The study focused on male Holstein and Holstein × Angus calves, separating them into groups receiving low or high amounts of colostrum replacer. The low amount gave 2.5g of IgG/kg body weight, while the large quantity provided 5.0g of IgG/kg body weight. The careful results of this research will help you better grasp calf health and immunology.

Researchers carefully tracked calf health using criteria such as fecal consistency and respiratory health ratings. Fecal consistency scores are a clear sign of gastrointestinal health. Diarrhea, for example, may cause dehydration, nutritional malabsorption, and poor overall development. Tracking feces twice daily allows researchers to immediately detect and treat abnormalities that may affect calf intestinal function and general health.

Respiratory health scores are another important measure. Calves are especially vulnerable to respiratory infections, which may impair development and raise death rates. Recording respiratory health scores enables early identification of symptoms, including coughing, nasal discharge, and difficulty breathing. Monitoring these signals allows farmers to respond quickly with treatments or management modifications to reduce the burden of respiratory infections and improve their animals’ long-term health and production.

Unlocking the Immune System: How Colostrum Shapes Calf Immunity 

Lymphocytes are essential to the immune system. These white blood cells serve as the body’s first line of defense against infection. They appear in various sorts, including B and T cells, each with a distinct immunological role. For example, B cells generate antibodies, but T cells target infected cells directly.

The outcomes of this research provided insight into how the amount of colostrum administered to calves affects their lymphocyte profiles. Calves given a larger quantity of colostrum replacer (HI) had a higher percentage of IgM+ B lymphocytes expressing critical markers such as CD21 and CD32. This indicates a more robust early immunological response than those on the reduced colostrum replacer (LOW) diet. Interestingly, the LOW group had a more significant percentage of γδ T cells expressing WC1.1, but breed differences did not substantially impact total lymphocyte profiles.

In layman’s words, giving calves more colostrum soon after birth might impact their immune system development, perhaps making them more resistant to infections in their early stages of life. The particular changes in lymphocyte composition highlight subtle ways in which early diet might influence long-term health consequences in dairy calves.

The Hidden Goldmine in Calf Health: Quality Over Breed 

As any experienced dairy farmer will tell you, every detail counts regarding your calves’ health. Our newest research found that the amount of colostrum received by the calf, rather than the breed (Holstein or Holstein × Angus), significantly impacted health indicators.

Given the historical arguments over breed performance, this may come as a surprise. Our findings indicated no significant breed differences in diarrhea or respiratory illness incidence. Calves that were given more colostrum replacer, on the other hand, had better immunological profiles. HI, calves receiving 5.0 g of IgG/kg body weight had more beneficial IgM+ B cells and fewer γδ T cells associated with health concerns.

So, how does this impact your dairy farm? Prioritizing high-quality, high-quantity colostrum consumption in the first 12 hours of life may result in healthier, more muscular calves, regardless of breed. This discovery suggests a change in emphasis from breed selection to early-life nutrition optimization, which might be a game-changing technique for boosting calf health and farm output.

Colostrum Quantity: The Real X-Factor in Calf Immunity and Health

  • High quantity (HI) of colostrum replacer (CR) increased the proportion of IgM+ B cells expressing CD21 and CD32 compared to the low quantity (LOW) group.
  • LOW calves showed a higher proportion of γδ T cells expressing WC1.1 than those in the HI group.
  • Breed did not significantly affect the proportion of days with diarrhea or respiratory disease.
  • No substantial impact of breed on lymphocyte profiles in blood was observed.
  • Overall health and lymphocyte populations in calves were influenced more by colostrum quantity than by breed.

Expert Insights: Translating Findings into Practice 

So, how do these results affect your dairy farm? The research unambiguously confirms the importance of colostrum quantity versus breed in determining calf health and immunity. This insight redirects our attention away from genetic predispositions and toward dietary therapies, which are more straightforward to regulate and improve.

First, consider the apparent evidence: calves fed more colostrum replacer (HI) had a more robust immunological profile, as seen by greater proportions of IgM+ B cells expressing CD21 and CD32. This shows that giving your calves a suitable amount of colostrum replacer during the first 12 hours of life might significantly improve their immunological health throughout the raising period.

So, how much colostrum should you aim for? The research used 5.0 g of IgG/kg body weight for the HI therapy. That is your gold standard. Ensure that every newborn calf receives this recommended amount to lower the risk of illnesses such as diarrhea and respiratory infections, which were observed but showed no significant changes in occurrence depending on quantity.

Given these insights, here’s some practical advice: 

  • Timely Colostrum Feeding: Colostrum should be administered within the first 12 hours of birth. This window is crucial for maximizing immunity.
  • Monitor Individual Calves: Not all calves will readily intake the required amount. Tube feeding ensures they receive the needed dosage.
  • Quality Control: Your focus shouldn’t just be on quantity but also the quality of colostrum. Aim for at least 50 g/L of IgG concentration [Mee, 2008].
  • Regular Health Checks: Though the study did not find breed differences, keeping a close watch on health metrics such as fecal consistency and respiratory scores can help early identification and management of issues.

Finally, while the study provides significant insights, larger sample sizes could reveal more detailed patterns. But for now, focusing on colostrum management offers a tangible way to improve calf health, giving them a strong start and eventually leading to a healthier, more productive herd. 

By incorporating these practices, you’re not just feeding calves but building a foundation for a healthier future herd. So, are you ready to make colostrum a top priority?

The Bottom Line

As previously discussed, colostrum’s function in calf health is not a hypothesis but a confirmed reality. The right amount of colostrum may significantly impact your calves’ early immunological development and general well-being, laying the groundwork for their future production. Breed may not be necessary, but the quantity of colostrum indeed is. Do you give your calves the most fantastic start in life? The evidence supports the necessity of colostrum in the early hours after birth, and your calves’ future—and perhaps your farm’s success—may rest on it.

Learn more: 

Real Syn Takes Over RZG Genomic Indexes – Sire Proof Central August 2024

dairy farmers, German indexes, Eurogenes, Interbull Genomic ranking, Real Syn, Alaska, Argentum, RZG ranking, Simply Red, Mask Red, Party P, Skill Red, Redwood, DG Maserati, AI-Total, Camden *RC, BTS Avea-Red, Koepon Skyliner Redbull Red, RZE (Type), Feet & Legs, Mammary System, August genetic evaluations, Holstein, Jersey, genetic evaluations, genetic gain, genomics, Holstein Net Merit, Cheese Merit, Total Performance Index, Holstein Association USA

Real Syn, a Rover son, is leading the B&W RZG Interbull Genomic ranking for the third time, with an impressive +166 RZG. Right behind, we have the Arizona brothers—Alaska at +163 RZG and Argentum at +161 RZG. Over in the R&W Interbull Genomic ranking, Simply Red takes the top spot at +159 RZG. He is followed closely by Malaga Red, a Mask Red son, with +158 RZG. Party P, Skill Red, and Redwood are sharing the third spot, all at +157 RZG.

What Dairy Breeders Need to Know About the Transition to 305-AA Yield Estimates

Learn how the new 305-AA yield estimates affect dairy farming. Ready for changes in genetic evaluations and milk yield predictions?

Significant changes are coming for dairy farmers in the U.S. Starting mid-June, the old 305-ME (Mature Equivalent) yield estimate will be replaced by the new 305-AA (Average Age) standard. This isn’t just an update but a significant improvement reflecting modern dairy practices and environmental factors, providing better tools for herd management and breeding decisions. 

Mark your calendars: On June 12, 305-AA yield estimates will debut in CDCB’s WebConnect data queries. By August 2024, they will be fully integrated into CDCB’s genetic evaluations. This change is based on extensive research and data analysis by USDA AGIL and CDCB, which examined over 100 million milk yield records. 

The industry needs updated tools to make accurate, fair comparisons among cows. This transition and the new 305-AA are based on a 2023 USDA AGIL and CDCB study analyzing millions of milk yield records. 

What does this mean for you? Moving to 305-AA aligns yield estimates with current insights on age, lactation length, climate, and other factors affecting milk production. This leads to more precise and fair comparisons among cows, helping optimize your herd’s performance. 

Stay tuned as we dive deeper into the 305-AA transition, its impact on genetic evaluations, breed-specific changes, and what to expect moving forward.

The New Age of Yield Estimation: Introducing 305-AA

305-AA stands for 305-Average Age. It’s the new method for accurately comparing dairy cows of different ages, climates, and calving seasons. This tool estimates a cow’s lactation corrected to a standard age of 36 months using partial yield measurements from milk tests. It’s a robust update reflecting modern dairy practices.

A New Era in Dairy Production Efficiency 

The shift from 305-ME to 305-AA is a game-changer for the dairy industry. For nearly 30 years, the 305-ME system couldn’t keep up with cow management and genetic advances. But now, the new 305-AA model brings us up to speed, leveraging recent insights into age, climate, and lactation variables for a more accurate milk yield estimate. 

A 2023 study by USDA AGIL and CDCB, analyzing over 100 million milk yield records, showed how outdated the old system was. The new 305-AA promises better decision-making tools, boosting both productivity and fairness in the industry.

What 305-AA Means for Different Dairy Breeds 

The transition to 305-AA will affect different dairy breeds in unique ways. Changes will be minimal for Holsteins, as their data heavily influenced the 1994 adjustments. This means Holstein farmers won’t see minor shifts in their yield estimates or genetic evaluations. 

Non-Holstein breeds will see more significant updates due to more precise, breed-specific adjustments. Ayrshires will experience stable PTAs with a slight increase in milk, fat, and protein yields, especially for younger males. Brown Swiss will see slightly higher overall yield PTAs for younger cows, with older animals maintaining stability. 

Guernseys will find that younger males show an increase, while older cows might see a slight decline in their milk, fat, and protein PTAs. Jersey cows will have a noticeable decrease in yield PTAs for younger males, but older males will benefit from an increase in their evaluations. 

This recalibration means that farmers focusing on non-Holstein breeds can expect more tailored and accurate yield estimates. These changes pave the way for better breed management and selection strategies in the future.

The Ripple Effects of 305-AA on Breed-Specific PTAs

The shift to 305-AA adjustments will have varied impacts on Predicted Transmitting Abilities (PTAs) across different dairy breeds. Each breed will experience unique changes for more breed-specific and accurate assessments. 

Ayrshire: PTAs will stay stable, with younger males seeing a slight increase in milk, fat, and protein yields. 

Brown Swiss: Young animals will see a slight increase in yield PTAs, while older animals remain stable. 

Guernsey: Younger males will experience an increase in milk, fat, and protein PTAs, while older males may see a decrease. 

Holstein: Young males will get a boost in yield PTAs, and older animals will have more stable measurements. 

Jersey: Younger males will see a decrease in yield PTAs, while older males will experience an increase.

Coming Soon: 305-AA Data Goes Live on CDCB WebConnect and Genetic Evaluations.

Starting June 12, 2024, you’ll see the new 305-AA yield estimates in CDCB’s WebConnect queries. This kicks off the move to 305-AA. 

By August 2024, 305-AA will be fully integrated into CDCB genetic evaluations. Phenotypic updates in the triannual evaluations will adopt the new method, affecting PTAs and indices like Net Merit $. 

Rest Easy: July Evaluations to Continue Uninterrupted; August Brings Enhanced Accuracy with 305-AA

Rest easy; switching to 305-AA won’t affect July’s monthly evaluations. Your data will still follow the old 305-ME adjustments for now. However, with the triannual update from August 13, 2024, all evaluations will feature the new 305-AA data, giving you the most accurate yield estimates for your dairy herd.

The Bottom Line

The switch to 305-AA is a big step forward. It uses the latest research and a massive database for more accurate milk yield estimates. This change reflects how dairy management and cow biology have evolved over the last 30 years. With 305-AA, comparing cows—no matter their age, breed, or conditions—is now fairer and more scientific. 

Key Takeaways:

The transition from 305-ME to 305-AA is set to bring significant advancements in yield estimation for U.S. dairy farmers. Here are some key takeaways: 

  • Effective date: 305-AA will be officially implemented starting June 12.
  • Modern alignment: This change reflects current management practices and environmental factors.
  • Updated research: Based on a 2023 study examining over 100 million milk yield records.
  • Breed-specific adjustments: Non-Holstein breeds will see more significant changes due to more precise data.
  • Impact on PTAs: Different breeds will experience unique effects on their Predicted Transmitting Abilities (PTAs).
  • Genetic evaluations: The 305-AA adjustments will appear in CDCB genetic evaluations starting August 2024.
  • Uninterrupted evaluations: The July monthly evaluations will not be affected by this change.


Summary: Starting mid-June, the old 305-ME yield estimate will be replaced by the new 305-AA standard, reflecting modern dairy practices and environmental factors. This transition aligns yield estimates with current insights on age, lactation length, climate, and other factors affecting milk production, leading to more precise and fair comparisons among cows. The new 305-AA model is based on extensive research and data analysis by USDA AGIL and CDCB, which examined over 100 million milk yield records. The industry needs updated tools to make accurate, fair comparisons among cows. The transition will affect different dairy breeds in unique ways, with Holstein farmers not seeing minor shifts in their yield estimates or genetic evaluations, while non-Holstein breeds will see more significant updates due to more precise, breed-specific adjustments. Ayrshires will experience stable Predicted Transmitting Abilities (PTAs), Brown Swiss will see slightly higher overall yield PTAs for younger cows, and Guardeys will show an increase in milk, fat, and protein PTAs.

Holstein vs. Jersey – What Color of Dairy Breed Is the Real Money Maker?

A recent headline in Hoard’s Dairyman proclaimed “Brown is the Color of Money” and that’s all it took for “The Hunt Family Feud” to take off over phone, email and Facebook.  With roots in Holsteins, dairy nutrition and dairy genetics, the perfect ingredients were present for arguments, controversy and loud proclamations of bull* –all of which are highly esteemed in the Hunt family.

Can you Measure the Difference?

This debate is fueled by a lot of things but every good argument needs actual facts. Inputs of feed, facility, equipment and staff may be impacted by the size differential between Holsteins and Jerseys.  Smaller animals may correspondingly require less inputs.  We have to recognize that “may” is the operative word here because there are different variables depending on each particular dairy operation.

One size variable that can’t be ignored is that dairy herd size is growing.  Faced with this scenario, there may be good reasons for choosing one breed over another or for having a combination of breeds on a single operation. Choice might be influenced by:

  • Specific markets
  • Relative health issues between breeds
  • Calving ease
  • Initial investment and sources for replacements

Many questions have to be answered, before a winner can be named.

Which Breed Fits the Facilities?

For those working in barns that were built twenty or more years ago where stalls are smaller, Jerseys may be a better fit.   As well new dairy operators who are renting such facilities could find that Jerseys would operate better in those smaller stalls.  Bedding packs also are another way to put minimal effort and expense into rented facilities. Jersey’s work well on packs. If there is a drawback, it could be that it may take more stalls to produce the same volume of milk.  However, if the Jerseys are high volume for %F and %P, then the pounds of fat+protein produced per day may be the same whether it’s Holsteins or Jersey.

 Which Breed Eats the Most?

Scientific examples abound regarding “efficiency” because of the Jersey’s smaller size. Let’s briefly consider human size relating to efficiency. “Is the size two female more efficient than her size 18 cousin. What are they producing?  Food for a party?  Or are you measuring food consumed? Not relevant.  Well – what about groceries consumed? Or children produced?  Getting warmer.  But there are still too many variables to make a choice based on efficiency related to size alone. However, back to choosing the most efficient dairy breed to feed. It isn’t only about quantity of feed consumed per cow per day. The calculation should refer to the net dollars per day for the herd. When calculating returns minus feed costs, Jerseys can be competitive. (Read more: Feed Efficiency: The Money Saver)

Which Breed Has Better Genetics and Genomics?

Jerseys are not just for show oriented breeders.  Milk production focused herds are using Jerseys.

Genetically Jerseys differ from Holsteins in that SCSs are higher, and the Median Suspensory Ligament (cleft) may not be as defined. Their reproduction is much superior.  Jersey dropped bull calves are much less in demand. Dollar value is low.  Using sexed semen for the top of the herd and beef semen on the bottom half gives a revenue source because crossbred dropped calves are in demand. (Read more: SEXED SEMEN – At Your Service!) Jerseys have genomic indexes as well. Genomics may have been a little slower to be adopted than in Holsteins but just wait Jerseys will catch up. Or so the argument goes. (Read more: Dairy Cattle Genomics)

Which Breed will Save Time?

Jerseys are the Queens when it comes to reproduction in dairy cattle, boasting easier calving, better conception rates and fewer inseminations. All of these have an impact on less vet time required for checking or treating as well as staff time and effort daily and annually. Easier calving for Jersey’s impacts that there will be fewer calf losses at birth and most likely more calves getting off to a better start. Superior reproduction can allow for less time off in the dry cow pen or less time milking at lower levels during a lifetime. (Read more: Artificial Insemination – Is Doing It Yourself Really Saving You Money?)  Every manager knows that staff and cows need time off. Unnecessary time off on the cow’s part means less than optimum returns over a cow’s lifetime. Jersey heifers reach puberty at a younger age.  This means age at first calving can be earlier, thus saving on rearing costs.

Which breed sells more milk? More live sales?

In the US, Jerseys are about 10% of the population. There has been steady growth in the number of Jersey herds in the U.S., particularly among large dairy owners in the West. The way breeders market and which markets they send their milk to is essential in areas where cheese and butter sales (which are at the highest relative level in twenty years) can greatly influence which breed you choose to work with.  Owners are producing milk that their processors desire.  In fact, the processor is the breeders’ customer not the end consumers.  With eat local food movements the world over being emphasized, Jerseys may fit better than other breeds in some situations. The recent popularity of Jerseys has resulted in the fact that sales of breeding stock have been good as well,

It’s All About the Numbers. Are they In the Red or In the Black?

When you want to win the argument over which breed is the most profitable it all comes down to the actual data, you are analyzing.  The reason the debate goes on is because there isn’t a source for reliable data comparing Jerseys and Holsteins.  And so we come back to the initial article which triggered these questions which reported a comparison that exists through financial reports of Ganske, Mulder & Co. LLC, the largest dairy accounting firm in the U.S., They prepared reports summarizing all of its clients as a group and also does a separate summary for its Jersey clients. “It is perhaps the only such set of Jersey financial data that exists” reports the article that goes on to present statistics and the following summation. “Jerseys did make less milk per day than did all of the firm’s clients. But Jersey herds had much higher protein and fat tests, which resulted in significantly higher milk price per hundredweight. As a result, Jersey herds’ bottom line was much bigger – they made 45.7 percent more net profit per head.

NAMESaleLotGLPI
OCONNORS PLANET LUCIAGenetics By Design13823
STE ODILE MOON MODEL AMALUNAGPS163798
OCONNORS LIVING THE DREAMGenetics By Design143755
MAPEL WOOD LAST DANCEGenetics By Design33710
MAPEL WOOD SNOWMAN LEXUSGenetics By Design43673
OCONNORS BOULDER LUNAGenetics By Design63537
MAPEL WOOD BOULDER LIMERICKGenetics By Design73537
OCONNORS LAST HOPEGenetics By Design23534
BENNER FORK JANARDANGPS13493
OCONNORS EPIC LAST CHANCEGenetics By Design83465
OCD MOGUL FUZZY NAVELSale of Stars53460
GEN-I-BEQ LEXOR PLAGESale of Stars453398
VELTHUIS SG LAVAMAN ENVYSale of Stars463372
MARBRI UNO BEAUTYGPS113328
MAPEL WOOD M O M LUCYGenetics By Design123299
ROCKYMOUNTAIN LEXOR EDENGPS323289
WELCOME-TEL ECOYNE ABBIESale of Stars123286
ZIMMER WENDON UNO CAMISale of Stars353268
OCONNORS SNOWMAN LEXIEGenetics By Design53255
BOLDI V S G EPIC ASTERSale of Stars73240

So What Color of Dairy Breed Is the Money Maker?

Jersey herds produced 48 pounds of fat and protein where all herds produced 5.0 pounds of fat and protein. This is not significantly different. But on any given day, on any particular dairy operation, the numbers can be rallied to support the choice that is dearest to the heart of owner-operators.

The Bullvine Bottom Line

In the end, your particular passion is what it all boils down to. When it comes to the choice of Black and White, Brown, or “green”, the only thing you can know for sure is that dairy love is NOT color blind. Whether your passion is driven by the color of the dairy breed or by the color of money … or both… the right answer is up to you?  End of argument.

Get original “Bullvine” content sent straight to your email inbox for free.

Jersey vs. Holstein – The Debate Continues

One of the things that makes the dairy community great is the passion producers have for what they do.  One area that we have found that brings out the most passion is debating which breed is the best.  While there are many ways to look at it, the most logical way is to look at which breed is the most profitable.

Since we first joined this discussion back in May of 2012, (Read more: Holstein vs. Jersey: Which breed is more profitable) there have been many interesting points raised on both sides of this question.  So we here at the Bullvine decided to take a deeper look at this issue and see if we could get more insight into this much debated topic.

Now first let`s be clear.  This is a very lopsided debate because Holsteins are the primary breed on 92% of the farms in North America, and Jersey is only the primary breed on about 3.5%.  But man you have to love the passionately vocal nature of most Jersey breeders.

Feed Conversion

With feed accounting for between 52 and 58 percent of the total cost of production, any significant advantage for either breed is its ability to convert feed into milk solids, especially with the increased costs of feed these days.  While the superior overall production ability of a Holstein vs. a Jersey (Holstein 24,291 lbs of milk 888lbs Fat 3.66 % Fat 765 lbs Protein 3.15 % Protein vs. Jersey  16,997 lbs milk 776 lbs Fat 4.57% Fat 633 lbs Protein 3.73% Protein)  has  long been documented the true numbers lie in how well each breed converts their feed intake into milk and milk solids In a Dairy Science paper they looked at feed intake studies for 4 breed groups: Holstein, Holstein x Jersey, Jersey x Holstein and Jersey, where all cows were fed the same ration, were housed in the same type of pens and were milked together.  The results found that Holstein had the highest intake and the highest production yield.  However, Jersey converted a higher percentage of their intake to production than Holstein did.

Item

Holstein

HJ

JH

Jersey

Intake

9,813

9,309

9,487

7,969

Growth

669 (6.8%)

599 (6.4%)

496 (5.2%)

334 (4.2%)

Maintenance

2,666 (27.25)

2,468 (26.5%)

2,425 (25.6%)

2,085 (26.2)

Pregnancy

27 (0.3%)

32 (0.3%)

33 (0.3%)

21 (0.3%)

Production

5,968 (60.8%)

6,057 (65.1%)

6,162 (65.0%)

5,259 (66.0%)

The bottom line result of this research was that Jerseys were 6% better at converting intake into production.  That may not seem that significant until you factor in that feed costs are 52-58% of total costs.  That difference represents a 3.3% increase in profitability.  One thing is for sure, feed efficiency is certainly one area that we need to have more supporting research in order to develop genetic indices.

Milk Price

One of the key factors determining which breed is better depends on where you market your milk.  Certain pricing models favor fluid milk production while others favor component production.  Fluid markets certainly favor Holstein while component markets favor Jerseys.  Pennsylvania researchers used a farm level income and policy simulator (FLIPSIM) model to predict farm performance under fluid pricing or component pricing in Pennsylvania.  Under fluid pricing, a high producing (13,961 pounds) 60-cow Jersey herd could expect a net cash income of $32,300 versus $63,100 for a high producing (20,600 pounds) Holstein herd.  Under component pricing, the same Jersey herd would increase in net cash income to $55,400 versus $61,100 for the Holstein herd.  Under component pricing, a Jersey herd could expect an increase of about $23,000, while the Holstein herd would decline slightly.  Combine that with the increased feed efficiency of the Jersey’s mentioned above and, depending on the pricing model in your area, Jerseys would become a more profitable option.  Especially when you factor in the less volatile milk solids market as compared to fluid milk pricing.

Reproduction

For years Jerseys have enjoyed the reputation of being far superior to Holstein.  However, increased attention to this area by many producers may have changed or at least narrowed the gap.  This is certainly an area that many breeders are paying attention to, specifically the scores for Conception Rate (CR), Daughter Pregnancy Rate (DPR) and Calving Interval (CI).  The Days to First Breeding (DFB) declined for Holsteins from 92 d in 1996 to 85 d in 2007.  A similar trend was not observed for Jerseys, possibly because synchronized breeding is more common in Holstein herds than in Jersey herds.  As far as conception rates are concerned, Jerseys still have a slight edge over Holsteins.  But that trend is also changing.  As Holsteins have gone from 2.5 NB (Number of Breedings per lactation) in 1996 to 2.6 in 2007, while Jersey’s have gone from 2.2 in 1996 to 2.4 in 2007.

Now one area that I often hear comments from producers about is the value of the resulting calves.  Specifically that drop bull calves that will be sold for beef.  One of the great strategies I have seen employed by many Jersey and even top Holstein herds is to breed the bottom 10% of their herd to a beef sire.  As they know they will not be needing the resulting females or males from these animals the value of using a beef sire, typically more than compensates for the Holstein versus Jersey drop calf price.  Another management or reproduction tool that many producers are using is sexed semen which allows them to greatly decrease the number of female calves needed for replacements.

The Bullvine Bottom Line

Holstein and Jersey cows both have their advantages and disadvantages.  Holsteins are larger and have higher salvage value than Jerseys.  Jerseys tend to be more efficient and typically have fewer reproductive challenges. Each have an advantage under milk pricing that favors their particular productive strengths.  The first area you need to look at for what breed is better for you, is the milk pricing model in your area.  If it is a fluid market, then typically Holstein would be more advantageous. If the price model favors component pricing, then you would typically be better off milking Jerseys.  After looking at the price model, you certainly need to adjust your management to maximize the reproduction and feed efficiency for the breed you have chosen.  Even your housing set up could be better suited for one breed over the other.  While I am sure the Jersey versus Holstein debate will go on for years to come, there are certain new trends that may be contrary to previous beliefs and new feed efficiency information that are opening many producers’ eyes.

 

Get original “Bullvine” content sent straight to your email inbox for free.

 

Send this to a friend