Archive for genetic base change 2025

Inbreeding Alert: How Hidden Genetic Forces Are Reshaping Your Dairy Herd’s Future

Dairy breeders alert: The 2025 genetic base change reveals hidden inbreeding impacts reshaping PTA values and herd futures.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The April 2025 genetic base update exposes how surging Holstein inbreeding silently distorts PTA adjustments, with proven bulls like Seagull-Bay Supersire-ET showing smaller-than-expected milk drops due to shifting Expected Future Inbreeding (EFI) calculations. As the Holstein population’s average relatedness spikes, EFI adjustments now account for 18% of PTA changes, requiring breeders to prioritize genomic relationship management. Delayed updates for calving traits until August 2025 add complexity, while breed-specific impacts highlight Holsteins’ 404 NM$ drop—double other breeds. Strategic herd management must now balance genetic progress with inbreeding mitigation through EFI monitoring and targeted mating programs.

KEY TAKEAWAYS:

  • EFI’s Hidden Power: Every 1% EFI increase costs 64 lbs milk yield, reshaping PTAs more aggressively in Holsteins than other breeds.
  • Supersire Shock Example: A 135-lb “missing” milk PTA drop reveals how population-wide inbreeding dilutes individual bull penalties.
  • Holstein Crisis: 2020-born base herds show 9.4% EFI (vs. 7.5% in 2015), accelerating inbreeding depression in evaluations.
  • Calving Trait Delay: Phenotypic calculation issues push key updates to August 2025, requiring interim breeding adjustments.
  • Survival Strategy: Focus on EFI-adjusted NM$, utilize low-relationship genomic sires, and implement mating software to curb profit erosion.

The April 2025 genetic base change isn’t just another spreadsheet update—it’s a genetic reckoning that demands immediate attention from every serious dairy producer. While the headline numbers show significant PTA drops across breeds, the real story lies in how increasing Holstein inbreeding is silently reshaping genetic evaluations and potentially threatening your herd’s future profitability.

The Genetic Time Bomb: Why Your Top Bulls Defy Expectations

When the Council on Dairy Cattle Breeding (CDCB) announced the 2025 base change, most Holstein breeders expected a uniform 752-pound drop in milk PTAs across their animals. Yet something unexpected happened: many proven bulls showed smaller decreases than anticipated.

Take Seagull-Bay Supersire-ET (007HO11351), for example. His milk PTA decreased from 978 to 361 pounds—a drop of only 617 pounds instead of the expected 752. This 135-pound “missing” decrease isn’t a calculation error—it’s a warning sign that inbreeding dynamics are changing rapidly in the Holstein population.

The Base Change Reality Check:

  • Holstein milk PTAs dropped by 752 pounds on average
  • Fat and protein PTAs decreased by 44 and 29 pounds respectively
  • Net Merit (NM$) values plummeted by $404
  • Jersey and Brown Swiss breeds experienced smaller adjustments

The magnitude of these changes reflects both genetic progress made between 2015 and 2020 and shifting inbreeding patterns that are reshaping how genetic evaluations work.

EFI Exposed: The Silent Profit Killer in Your Breeding Program

At the heart of this genetic puzzle is a measurement called Expected Future Inbreeding (EFI), which has been used to adjust PTAs since 2008. Think of EFI as your bull’s genetic shadow—the darker it looms over the herd; the more milk profits evaporate in future generations.

EFI measures how closely related an animal is to the current female population. When a bull is mated randomly to the breed, EFI predicts the level of inbreeding expected in the offspring. This matters because inbreeding depression has real economic consequences:

Inbreeding’s Hidden Cost Per 1% Increase:

  • Milk yield: 63.9 pounds reduction
  • Net Merit (NM$): $25 decrease
  • Fat yield: 1.18-1.70 kg decrease
  • Protein yield: 0.90-1.45 kg decrease
  • Calving interval: 0.19-0.34 days longer

The CDCB adjusts PTAs using a formula that accounts for an animal’s EFI relative to the base population: PTAEFI = PTA0 + b(EFI − EFIbase). This adjustment helps predict the true genetic merit an animal will transmit when accounting for inbreeding depression.

The Holstein Relationship Crisis

What’s changed dramatically between the 2015 and 2020 base populations is the average level of relatedness among animals. The Holstein breed has experienced a rapid increase in relationships among young animals, driven largely by the intensive use of genomically-tested elite sires.

In Supersire’s case, his inbreeding adjustment changed from -441 to -310 pounds between December 2024 and April 2025. This occurred because while his individual EFI remained relatively stable (13.5% to 13.6%), the base population’s average EFI jumped from 7.5% to 9.4%.

This increasing relatedness in the Holstein population means:

  1. The new base population (2020-born cows) is significantly more inbred than the previous base
  2. The difference between an individual bull’s EFI and the population average has narrowed
  3. Inbreeding adjustments are now smaller relative to the base population

Breed Differences: Not All Breeds Face Equal Challenges

The impact of inbreeding on genetic evaluations varies considerably across breeds:

BreedMilk (lbs)Fat (lbs)Protein (lbs)NM$
Holstein7524429$404
Jersey3551614$179
Brown Swiss381914$130

These differences reflect both the genetic progress made within each breed and the varying levels of inbreeding. Holsteins show the most dramatic adjustments, highlighting the more intensive selection and higher inbreeding rates in this population.

Calving Traits: The Delayed Update

While most traits have transitioned to the new genetic base, calving traits (Daughter Calving Ease, Sire Calving Ease, Daughter Stillbirth, and Sire Stillbirth) will maintain their current base until August 2025. This temporary delay resulted from unexpected issues when applying base updates to these phenotypically scaled traits.

This exception means that until August, these traits will continue to be evaluated against the 2015 base population, though new phenotypic data received since December will still be incorporated into evaluations.

Your Strategic Action Plan

The 2025 genetic base change demands a complete reassessment of breeding strategies. Here’s how to adapt:

1. Recalibrate Selection Thresholds

Previous benchmarks for selecting AI sires need upward revision. If you previously selected bulls with +2000 NM$ you might now look for $1600 NM$ bulls given the base change.

2. Focus on Rankings, Not Absolute Values

The relative ranking of animals remains more important than their absolute PTA values. Compare animals within the same evaluation run rather than fixating on specific PTA thresholds.

3. Implement Inbreeding Management

With Holstein inbreeding accelerating, consider:

  • Monitoring EFI values when selecting sires
  • Utilizing outcross sires with lower relationships to the general population
  • Implementing mating programs that optimize for both genetic gain and inbreeding control

4. Prepare for the August Calving Trait Update

Remember that calving traits will maintain their current base until August 2025, requiring another adjustment to selection criteria later this year.

The Bottom Line

The 2025 genetic base change reveals both remarkable progress and new challenges for dairy breeders. The increasing rate of inbreeding in Holsteins has amplified the effect of PTA adjustments, creating a situation where genetic evaluations reflect not just advancement but also changing population relationships.

By understanding how EFI influences genetic evaluations and implementing strategies to manage inbreeding while maintaining genetic progress, you can navigate this genetic reset to enhance your herd’s potential and profitability in the years ahead.

Remember: Genetic progress without inbreeding control is like milking three-legged cows—eventually, the whole operation crashes.

Learn more:

Join the Revolution!

Join over 30,000 successful dairy professionals who rely on Bullvine Daily for their competitive edge. Delivered directly to your inbox each week, our exclusive industry insights help you make smarter decisions while saving precious hours every week. Never miss critical updates on milk production trends, breakthrough technologies, and profit-boosting strategies that top producers are already implementing. Subscribe now to transform your dairy operation’s efficiency and profitability—your future success is just one click away.

NewsSubscribe
First
Last
Consent

2025 U.S. Genetic Base Change: Final Values and Strategic Implications

Two thousand twenty-five genetic base shifts are most substantial for the Holsteins. Calving traits delayed amid inbreeding surge – what it means for your herd’s future.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The 2025 U.S. genetic base change reveals accelerated progress but new complexities, with Holsteins facing amplified inbreeding impacts on PTAs. While most traits now reflect 2020-born cows, calving trait updates remain delayed until August due to calculation anomalies. Breed-specific adjustments demand revised selection strategies, particularly for semen use decisions. Updated Lifetime Net Merit indices reflect shifting market realities, while enhanced reliability calculations improve non-Holstein-type evaluations. This reset demands immediate breeder action to maintain genetic momentum.

KEY TAKEAWAYS:

  • Base Change Magnitude: The largest adjustment in years reflects a 5-year genetic leap, requiring recalibration of PTA benchmarks
  • Calving Traits On Hold: Phenotypic calculation quirks delay updates until August 2025 despite other traits going live
  • Holstein Inbreeding Effect: Rising inbreeding rates amplify PTA shifts, demanding revised selection thresholds
  • Economic Index Overhaul: NM$ revisions align with current milk prices and feed costs, altering sire rankings
  • Strategic Imperative: Breeders must reassess sexed/beef semen use criteria to capitalize on new genetic realities

The April 2025 U.S. genetic base change represents one of the most significant updates in recent years, reflecting unprecedented genetic progress in dairy cattle over the past five years. As the base shifts from cows born in 2015 to those born in 2020, dairy producers will need to recalibrate their genetic selection strategies. The final values reveal substantial changes across breeds, with adjustments to PTA values, breeding indices, and reference populations. Notably, calving traits have been temporarily excluded due to unexpected results when applying the base change calculations, with updates for these traits postponed until August 2025 following further investigation. The accelerated genetic progress demonstrated by this base change, combined with increasing inbreeding rates, especially in Holsteins, signals both positive advancement and new challenges for dairy breeders.

Table 1: Value of the genetic change between cows born in 2020 and cows born in 2015.

TraitUnitsAyrshireBrown SwissGuernseyHolsteinJerseyMilking Shorthorn
MilkPounds142381687523556
FatPounds3904416-7
ProteinPounds51422914-3
Productive lifeMonths0.080.90.722.311.610.37
Somatic cell score (SCS)Log base 2 units0.02-0.040-0.10.020.02
Daughter pregnancy rate%-0.99-0.61-0.45-0.21-0.39-0.53
Heifer conception rate%-0.690.14-0.320.941.41-0.52
Cow conception rate%-1.15-0.48-0.850.450.05-0.37
Cow livability%-0.860.47-0.030.410.61-0.04
Gestation length2Days0.15-0.080.16-0.650.28̶
Residual Feed IntakePounds̶̶̶-42.34̶̶
Milk fever / Hypocalcemia%̶̶̶0.070.1̶
Displaced abomasum%̶̶̶0.350.21̶
Ketosis%̶̶̶1.04-0.06̶
Mastitis%̶-0.01̶0.7-1.05̶
Metritis%̶̶̶1.02-0.02̶
Retained Placenta%̶̶̶0.01-0.11̶
Early first calvingDays-0.250.660.232.371.93-1.72
Heifer LivabilityDays̶̶̶0.460.18̶
Final ScorePoints0.20.20.3*0.50.2
StaturePoints0.50.4-0.1*0.50.2
StrengthPoints00.10.1*0.10
Dairy formPoints0.20-0.1*0.40.2
Front Teat AttachmentPoints0.30.20.2*0.20.1
Rear Legs – Side ViewPoints-0.10-0.2*0-0.1
Body depthPoints0.100*00.1
Rump anglePoints00.2-0.5*-0.30
Rump widthPoints0.20.10.2*0.30.2
Fore udder attachmentPoints0.5̶0.5̶0.7*0.90.2
Rear udder heightPoints0.4̶0.4̶0.5*0.50.2
Rear udder widthPoints0.20.20.2*0.10.1
Udder depthPoints0.60.40.6*0.70.2
Udder cleftPoints0.30.10.1*0.20.1
Front teat placementPoints0.30.30.2*0.40.2
Teat LengthPoints-0.2-0.4-0.2*0.1-0.1
Rear Legs – Rear ViewPoints̶0.10.2*00.1
MobilityPoints̶0.1̶̶00.1
Milking SpeedPoints̶0̶̶00
Rear teat placement – rear viewPoints̶0.1̶̶0.3̶
Rear teat placement – side viewPoints̶̶̶̶-0.1̶
Lifetime Net Merit**Dollars71130-15404179-12
Lifetime Cheese Merit**Dollars65117-17375166-4
Lifetime Fluid Merit**Dollars73135-13417184-15
Lifetime Grazing Merit**Dollars47104-39386151-30

– Trait not calculated and published for the breed
* Trait calculated by Holstein Association USA
** Economic weights applied to Lifetime Merit Indices are also updated in April 2025.

Understanding the Genetic Base Change Process

The U.S. genetic base update is a routine recalibration every five years to align selection tools with the current dairy herd’s genetic capabilities. Beginning April 1, 2025, the genetic evaluations produced by the Council on Dairy Cattle Breeding (CDCB) will shift their reference point from cows born in 2015 to those born in 2020. This shift resets the baseline against which all animals are measured, ensuring that genetic evaluations remain relevant in a rapidly improving population.

Every dairy animal with genetic evaluations based on CDCB and Holstein USA data is compared to this breed population average, known as the base. Traits are measured as Predicted Transmitting Abilities (PTAs) relative to this established baseline. As genetic progress continually advances, this five-year recalibration provides dairy producers with an accurate point of comparison, essentially serving as a genetic report card that demonstrates progress compared to the previous generation.

The 2025 base change is particularly notable because it’s larger than previous adjustments, directly reflecting the industry’s accelerated genetic progress in the preceding five years. Genomic evaluations and advanced reproductive technologies, including sexed semen, embryo transfer, and in-vitro fertilization, primarily drive this acceleration.

Key Adjustments and Their Implications

The genetic base change involves complex adjustments beyond measuring the genetic difference between cow populations from different years. After determining the genetic difference between cows born in 2020 and those born in 2015, inbreeding and heterosis adjustments are applied, significantly impacting the final PTA values.

In the Holstein breed particularly, the increasing rate of inbreeding over the five years has amplified the effect of these adjustments on PTA values. This means the numerical shifts in genetic evaluations reflect genetic advancement and changing population dynamics. Understanding these nuances is critical for correctly interpreting the new genetic evaluations for dairy producers.

Along with the base change, the Lifetime Net Merit (NM$) index is being revised, including updates to Cheese, Fluid, and Grazing Merit. This 2025 revision adjusts methods for estimating trait values and updates numerous income and cost variables, such as milk prices, feed requirements, and reproductive options. Such revisions ensure that selection indices reflect current economic realities and production objectives.

Breed-Specific Impacts

The magnitude of the base change adjustments varies considerably across breeds, reflecting different rates of genetic progress. These differential impacts underscore the importance of breed-specific genetic selection strategies. Dairy producers must adjust their selection thresholds accordingly, particularly when deciding which cows to breed with sexed semen versus beef semen.

Calving Traits: A Notable Exception

A significant aspect of the 2025 base change is the decision to maintain calving traits in their current base. The calving traits—Daughter Calving Ease, Sire Calving Ease, Daughter Stillbirth, and Sire Stillbirth—represent a unique category in which genetic evaluations are reported on an observed (phenotypic) scale, meaning both genetic and phenotypic bases must be updated during a base change.

Unexpected results emerged when these base updates were applied for the April evaluation. Due to the timing of this discovery, the CDCB decided to maintain calving traits using the same genetic and phenotypic bases used to calculate them in December 2024. This decision ensures reliability while allowing time for further investigation. The CDCB expects to update the bases for calving traits in August 2025 after completing a thorough analysis.

This temporary maintenance of the previous base for calving traits will not impact other characteristics in the genetic evaluations. New phenotypic data received since December will still be incorporated, ensuring the evaluations remain current despite using the previous base.

Updates to Reference Populations and Calculation Methods

Breed Base Representation Changes

In addition to the core base change, April 2025 brings significant updates to the Breed Base Representation (BBR) reference population. These updates implement refined business rules for selecting purebred bulls, made possible by increasing the availability of genotyped animals and advancements in data quality, methodologies, and technology.

The BBR reference population will now be selected from genotyped, progeny-tested bulls with at least 10 enrolled daughters (excluding bulls with status codes C and N), complete pedigrees, and are classified as purebred within each breed of evaluation. When rounded to the nearest integer, a purebred bull must have a pedigree-based heterosis value ≤ 1%.

These changes will affect the percentage of animals receiving new BBR values differently across breeds—from approximately 25% in Ayrshire to only about 1% in Holstein. Generally, the new methodology will decrease BBR values across breeds, as it improves the detection of animals with non-purebred ancestors.

Type Trait Reliability Calculations

For non-Holstein breeds, April 2025 brings a significant methodological update to type trait reliability calculations. Historically, while PTAs for type evaluations have been derived from a multiple-trait model, reliabilities were calculated using a single-trait model. The growing volume of appraisal data has prompted the alignment of both processes to follow the multiple-trait methodology.

As a result, traditional PTAs will remain unchanged. Still, reliabilities for most traits will increase, particularly those with limited data, which will now benefit from genetic correlations with other characteristics. Genomic PTAs will see more noticeable impacts as reliability adjustments affect SNP solutions and weighting factors in final calculations.

Strategic Implications for Dairy Producers

The 2025 base change presents dairy producers with a significant opportunity to reassess their genetic improvement strategies. With genetic progress accelerating, an effective selection strategy becomes increasingly crucial. Selection indices like Herd Health Profit Dollars® (HHP$®) provide efficient approaches to simultaneous improvement across multiple traits.

The adjustments coming in April mean producers will likely need to recalibrate their selection thresholds for A.I. sires and adjust criteria for determining which cows are bred to beef or sexed semen. This recalibration process is essential to maintain genetic progress and ensure that genetic selection decisions align with updated evaluations.

While potentially disruptive in the short term, the magnitude of this base change ultimately reflects the industry’s success in accelerating genetic improvement. It signals that dairy producers are making faster genetic progress than ever, necessitating corresponding evolution in genetic evaluation systems to maintain their accuracy and relevance.

Conclusion

The 2025 U.S. genetic base change represents both remarkable progress and an opportunity for strategic realignment. The substantial shifts in genetic evaluations across breeds demonstrate the dairy industry’s success in accelerating genetic improvement through advanced technologies and selection practices. While the adjustment process may temporarily disrupt established selection thresholds, it ultimately provides dairy producers with more accurate tools for genetic selection.

The special handling of calving traits highlights the complexity of genetic evaluation systems and the importance of maintaining evaluation integrity even when unexpected challenges arise. Meanwhile, the updates to reference populations and calculation methodologies further refine the precision of genetic evaluations.

This base change is a milestone for dairy producers, marking five years of genetic advancement and prompting them to reevaluate selection strategies to ensure continued progress. By understanding these changes and adjusting breeding decisions accordingly, producers can leverage this base change to enhance their herds’ genetic potential and profitability in the years ahead.

Read more:

Join the Revolution!

Join over 30,000 successful dairy professionals who rely on Bullvine Daily for their competitive edge. Delivered directly to your inbox each week, our exclusive industry insights help you make smarter decisions while saving precious hours every week. Never miss critical updates on milk production trends, breakthrough technologies, and profit-boosting strategies that top producers are already implementing. Subscribe now to transform your dairy operation’s efficiency and profitability—your future success is just one click away.

NewsSubscribe
First
Last
Consent
Send this to a friend