Archive for energy use

How Dairy Farms in the US Cut Greenhouse Gases by 42% in 50 Years

See how US dairy farms have changed in 50 years. Want to know more? Read the full story.

Have you ever wondered how your morning milk became more environmentally friendly? Over the last 50 years, dairy farms in the United States have seen a dramatic change, increasing milk production efficiency while considerably reducing environmental impact. These changes are more than simply numbers on paper; they impact our everyday lives, health, and common environment.

Join us as we look at this beautiful path of advancement and invention. Discover how technological improvements, crop yields, and farm management have revolutionized the dairy farming industry. This isn’t simply about cows making more milk.  It’s about a holistic improvement in: 

  • Greenhouse gas emissions reduction
  • Improved fossil energy efficiency
  • Smarter water usage

“The national average intensity of GHG emissions decreased by 42%, demonstrating a 14% increase in the total GHG emissions of all dairy farms over the 50 years.”

The implications of these developments are enormous. Reduced environmental effects lead to a healthier earth, while enhanced production efficiency guarantees that dairy products remain a mainstay in our meals. As consumers, being aware of these improvements enables us to make better decisions and appreciate the intricate processes that deliver food to our meals.

Environmental Metric19712020% Change
GHG Emissions (kg CO2e/kg FPCM)1.700.99-42%
Fossil Energy Use (MJ/kg FPCM)5.772.67-54%
Water Use (kg/kg FPCM)33.524.1-28%
Ammonia Emissions (g/kg FPCM)11.67.59-35%
Nitrogen Leaching (g/kg FPCM)5.231.61-69%
Phosphorus Runoff (mg/kg FPCM)176.2118.3-33%

Guess What? We Now Need 30% Fewer Cows but Produce Twice the Milk! 

Did you know that we now require around 30% fewer cows to produce almost twice as much milk as we did fifty years ago? That’s correct; despite having fewer cows, milk output has increased dramatically, owing to advances in agricultural methods and technology.

Here’s a brief breakdown: 

  • 1971: Larger herds with lower production efficiency needed more cows.
  • 2020: With better genetics, nutrition, and farm management, fewer cows produce more milk.

What does this mean for the environment? The math is simple and impactful: 

  • 42% decrease in greenhouse gas (GHG) emission intensity per unit of milk produced.
  • 54% decrease in fossil energy use intensity.
  • 28% reduction in water intensity for milk production.

This is more than simply producing more milk; it is also about making it more environmentally friendly and sustainable. The advantages extend beyond the farm, impacting everything from energy use to water conservation. Dairy farms reduce their environmental impact significantly by increasing efficiency.

Isn’t it a marvel? The dairy business has shown that with innovation and effort, fewer resources may lead to increased production and environmental advantages. It’s a narrative of growth that offers hope for a sustainable future.

Watch Out! The New Tech Revolution Turning Dairy Farms Green

Consider how smarter, more efficient agricultural equipment may alter the dairy sector. Tractors have evolved into lean, mean machines capable of producing milk. Today’s tractors are significantly more fuel-efficient than those of the past. They lowered fossil fuel use by 54% using less diesel [USDA NASS, 2023b].

But it’s not just the tractors. The energy that runs dairy farms has likewise undergone a green revolution. The push for renewable energy has made it cleaner and more efficient, resulting in lower greenhouse gas emissions from power consumption [Rotz et al., 2021]. This environmentally friendly makeover includes fertilizer. More effective fertilizers need less of them to provide higher crop yields, minimize nutrient runoff, and reduce fossil fuel use [Kleinman et al., 2019].

All of these developments add up. Each technological advancement increases dairy farming productivity while also being more environmentally friendly.

The Surprising Shift: Why the West is Now the Dairy Capital 

So, why is there so much talk regarding regional shifts? Let’s get into it. Dairy farming in the United States has increasingly transitioned from the East to the West over the last 50 years. This relocation has substantially impacted environmental indicators in addition to geography. Take cow numbers as an illustration. In the East, numbers have dropped by almost 49%. Contrast this with the West, where cow numbers have more than doubled.

So, what does this transition signify for the environment? For starters, the West’s greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions have surged as the number of cows has grown. GHG emissions are projected to triple in places such as the Northwest and Southwest. This surge cancels out the East’s lower emissions, resulting in a moderate national increase of 14% in overall GHG emissions.

Then there’s water consumption. Western farms depend heavily on irrigated crops to feed their cattle, causing water demand in locations such as the Southwest to skyrocket—576 kg/kg FPCM. The national total water usage has increased by 42%, posing a significant challenge considering the West’s periodic water shortages and droughts.

However, it is not all doom and gloom. There have been some beneficial developments. For example, although ammonia emissions increased by 29% overall, fertilizer runoff losses such as nitrogen and phosphorus have reduced due to improved agricultural techniques.

The east-to-west movement has had a mixed effect—improved efficiency on the one hand but increased resource usage and emissions on the other. The goal is to reduce these heightened consequences while maintaining efficiency improvements.

You Won’t Believe How Efficient Dairy Farms Have Become! 

Did you know that during the last 50 years, greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions per unit of milk produced in the United States have fallen by 42%? This significant drop is primarily the result of improvements in milk production efficiency and novel dairy farm operations. For example, contemporary technology has helped dairy farms become more efficient, enabling them to produce the same quantity of milk while using fewer resources and producing less waste.

You may wonder how this considerable reduction in GHG emission intensity translates into just a 14% increase in overall GHG emissions, particularly considering the huge increase in milk output. The solution is efficiency. In 1971, dairy farms required more cows and energy to produce the same quantity of milk. Today, technological breakthroughs, such as improved feed quality and management procedures, have enabled farms to grow almost twice as much milk with 30% fewer cows.

While total milk production has almost doubled, increased efficiency means that each gallon produces much less emissions. For example, agricultural methods today include improved manure management, which decreases methane emissions, and precision feeding, which optimizes cow diets to minimize GHG emissions (https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions). Adopting renewable energy sources like anaerobic digesters reduces GHG emissions by converting waste into electricity  (https://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/pub-details/?pubid=90538).

So, while generating much more milk, the overall increase in GHG emissions is relatively minor. This balance demonstrates the impressive efficiency improvements of current dairy production operations. Not only does this improvement assist the environment, but it also illustrates how technology breakthroughs may generate considerable environmental change. Isn’t it something to think the next time you have a glass of milk?

Here’s Something to Chew On: US Dairy Farms Have Made Remarkable Strides in Reducing Their Reliance on Fossil Energy 

The figures reveal an eye-opening narrative of a 54% decline in fossil energy intensity over the last 50 years. This implies that the energy needed per unit of milk produced has been reduced by more than half! Furthermore, the overall amount of fossil energy used across all farms has fallen by 9%.

How did we achieve this big efficiency boost? Technological developments and improved resource management play prominent roles. For starters, the transition to more efficient gear has been game-changing. Modern tractors and equipment use far less fuel per acre than their antique predecessors. Adopting diesel engines instead of gasoline engines has also been a significant advancement. Naranjo et al. (2020) found comparable results for California dairy farms, indicating a general trend.

However, it is not just about improved engines. The transition to renewable energy sources, such as employing anaerobic digesters to produce power from cow dung, contributes to a decrease in fossil energy use. These digesters not only reduce fossil fuel usage but also aid in reducing greenhouse gas emissions.

On the farm management front, resource efficiency has gained precedence. Farmers are increasingly using technologies such as precision agriculture, which enables them to apply the exact quantity of inputs such as water and fertilizer, reducing waste and increasing efficiency.

These developments are not just flashes in the pan but significant milestones toward sustainable dairy production. And although we’ve made tremendous progress, the road is far from done. The dairy industry’s continuing commitment to innovation and development will guarantee that it stays responsible for our natural resources.

Brace for Impact: Western Dairy Farms’ Water Use is Skyrocketing Despite Efficiency Gains 

While we’ve made significant progress in lowering water consumption intensity per unit of milk produced by 28%, the tale doesn’t stop there. The transfer of milk production to the drier western areas has resulted in a 42% rise in total blue water use. This implies that, while utilizing water more effectively, the sheer quantity of dairy farms in arid places has increased total water use.

So why is this such a huge deal? Water is a valuable and often limited resource, particularly in the West. Increasing irrigation water demand confronts the combined danger of rising temperatures and decreasing water resources. As climatic conditions worsen, it is apparent that water usage efficiency will no longer be a luxury; it will be required for the long-term viability of US dairy farms.

Innovative technology and improved water management methods may assist in addressing this problem. Advanced irrigation systems, drought-resistant crops, and even the capture and reuse of water in dairy operations must become routine practices. This proactive strategy guarantees that dairy farming grows while still being environmentally friendly.

The Nutrient Puzzle: Why Are Some Emissions Up While Others Are Down? 

Let’s examine nutritional losses—they’re a bit like a double-edged sword. Have you ever wondered why some emissions rise while others fall? It’s rather fascinating.

Consider ammonia emissions, for example. They increased by a stunning 29%. You could be wondering, “Why?” As it turns out, more cows are kept in open areas, and long-term manure storage is used more often. These technologies are known for emitting substantial ammonia into the atmosphere [Rotz, 2014]. This has been a tricky issue since, as our technologies progressed, they unintentionally resulted in more ammonia floating about.

On the other hand, nitrogen leaching has decreased by 39%, which is a good surprise. How did this happen? The key is effective nutrition management. Farms avoid excess nitrogen from leaching into groundwater by improving manure nitrogen use and reducing inorganic fertilizer usage. Using cover crops and less tillage reduces leaching (Castaño-Sánchez, 2022). As ammonia emissions increased, nitrogen levels that may contaminate water sources were reduced.

Continuing with uneven outcomes, let’s talk about the runoff losses. Here’s a positive statistic: nitrogen and phosphorus runoff losses have decreased by 27% to 51%. That is big! Fewer tillage operations and cover crops have lowered nutrient and sediment runoff [Veltman, 2021]. When manure is absorbed into the soil more quickly and with some subsurface injection, less phosphorus ends up in runoff, especially sediment-bound phosphorus.

So there you have it. The landscape of nutrient outputs and losses is complicated, requiring a continual balancing act. Nonetheless, these advancements indicate that we are moving on the right path, even if specific indicators lag.

The Hidden Cost of Efficiency: Rising Methane and VOC Emissions

A disadvantage of higher milk production efficiency is increased methane (CH4) and volatile organic compounds (VOCs). Over the last 50 years, methane emissions from dairy farms have increased by 32%, while reactive non-methane VOCs have increased by 53%. These data should catch your attention, particularly given the rapid expansion of dairy farms in the western areas.

So, what’s behind these increases? It comes down to two key factors: 

  • More Cows, More Emissions: Western dairy farms have expanded significantly despite a national decline in cow numbers. More cows produce more methane, primarily via enteric fermentation and waste management. The construction of long-term manure storage facilities, such as lagoons and piles, increases methane emissions.
  • Increased Surface Area for VOCs: Changes in how farmers store feed and waste add to VOC emissions. Large, open silage bunkers and piles enable more organic material to react with oxygen, producing and releasing volatile organic compounds.

The environmental implications are worrying: 

  • Climate Change: Methane is a potent greenhouse gas, with a global warming potential 28 times larger than CO2 [EPA]. The rise in methane levels is a setback in the battle against climate change.
  • Air Quality: VOCs lead to the formation of ground-level ozone and smog, which degrades air quality and presents health hazards.

These growing emissions underscore the need for new methods and technology to manage manure and silage on dairy farms effectively. To address these expanding problems, environmental stewardship must stay up with industrial improvements.

Still Skeptical About the Incredible Advancements in Dairy Farming? Here’s What the Experts Are Saying! 

Still dubious about the remarkable advances in dairy farming? Let’s look at what the experts are saying.

Capper et al. found that improved feed efficiency and animal management practices had considerably increased milk yield per cow. According to [Capper et al., 2009](https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2009-2079), the average milk supply per cow has increased by 2.4 times in the last 50 years, leading to significant environmental advantages.

The USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS) backs up these allegations. Their statistics demonstrate a staggering 42% reduction in greenhouse gas emission intensity across US dairy farms, attributable to advances in feed efficiency and other sustainable practices ([USDA NASS, 2023a](https://www.nass.usda.gov/).

Rotz et al. discuss technical improvements, emphasizing the function of precision agricultural instruments and anaerobic digesters in lowering fossil energy use. According to their complete study, “The shift to more efficient farm machinery and renewable energy sources has cut fossil energy use by over 50% per unit of milk produced ” ([Rotz et al., 2021](https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2020-19793)).

However, not everything is bright, as Hospers et al. point out in their analysis of Dutch dairy farms. They point out that although Western US farmers have made tremendous progress, overall output growth has resulted in increased water demand. “Efficient irrigation technologies have not kept up with the rapid expansion of dairy operations in arid regions,” their report says (Hospers et al., 2022).

Even environmentalists are chiming in. Hristov et al. note that ammonia emissions remain a major problem. “Despite significant gains in reducing other pollutants, ammonia from manure storage and management still poses environmental challenges,” they warn (Hristov et al., 2018).

These credentials support the assertions and highlight the continuing problems and opportunities for future progress in US dairy production. Whether it’s a rise in milk output or the introduction of ground-breaking technology, the sector is transforming, and the evidence speaks for itself.

The Bottom Line

The dairy business in the United States has made fantastic improvements during the last 50 years. We’ve made significant progress in lowering the number of cows required, improving milk production efficiency, and minimizing environmental consequences such as greenhouse gas emissions and energy consumption. However, these accomplishments are fraught with difficulties, particularly in countries such as the West, where water use has surged. Improved efficiency is excellent, but it is evident that continuous innovation and new methods are required to sustain this pace.

The dilemma remains: How can we continue to enjoy dairy products while safeguarding the environment? It’s not only about reflecting on our achievements but also about anticipating what might be accomplished. Can we make additional efforts to capture renewable energy on farms, enhance waste management systems, or adopt more water-efficient agricultural practices? Sustainable dairy production in the future depends on our willingness to accept and spread these creative ideas.

Key Takeaways:

  • Dairy farms in the US now use 30% fewer cows but produce twice as much milk compared to 50 years ago.
  • Technological advancements have significantly increased crop yields, fuel efficiency, and resource efficiency on farms.
  • Greenhouse gas (GHG) emission intensity per unit of milk decreased by 42%, even though total GHG emissions slightly increased by 14%.
  • Fossil energy use per unit of milk dropped by 54%, with a national total reduction of 9% in fossil energy use over 50 years.
  • Water intensity for milk production decreased by 28%, but total blue water use rose by 42% due to more dairy farms in arid western regions.
  • Ammonia emissions increased by 29%, while nitrogen leaching losses decreased by 39% over the same period.
  • Total phosphorus runoff losses decreased by 27% to 51%, thanks to better fertilizer use, reduced tillage, and more cover crops.
  • Methane emissions rose by 32%, and reactive non-methane volatile organic compounds increased by 53%, attributed to long-term manure storage and silage practices.
  • Continued advancements are essential to further reduce the environmental impact of dairy farming in light of climate variability.

Summary:

Over the past 50 years, US dairy farms have drastically improved in areas like milk production efficiency and environmental sustainability. With 30% fewer cows, farms now produce double the milk. Technological advancementshave reduced greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions intensity by 42% and fossil energy use intensity by 54%. However, total GHG emissions rose by 14%, and methane and reactive non-methane VOC emissions increased due to enhanced manure storage methods. Water use in the western regions surged by 42% despite efficiency improvements. The eastern regions showed notable reductions in nutrient runoff, emphasizing a mixed but overall positive trend towards sustainable dairy farming. Technological advancements, crop yields, and farm management have improved the dairy farming industry, reducing greenhouse gas emissions, improving fossil energy efficiency, and ensuring smarter water usage. Smarter agricultural equipment has transformed the dairy sector, with tractors now being more fuel-efficient and fertilizers requiring less to provide higher crop yields and minimize nutrient runoff. Some beneficial developments have been achieved, such as reduced ammonia emissions and fertilizer runoff losses due to improved agricultural techniques.

Learn More: 

Unlocking Carbon Accounting: New Revenue Streams for Small and Large Farms Alike

Unlock new revenue streams for farms of all sizes through carbon accounting. How can your farm benefit from carbon credits and sustainable practices? Discover more.

Historically, carbon credits have been an advantage reserved for larger farms with the capital and resources to invest in projects like anaerobic digestion for methane capture. Smaller farms were sidelined due to prohibitive costs and complex requirements. 

Changing regulatory frameworks and a push for supply chain sustainability are creating new opportunities. California’s Voluntary Carbon Market Disclosure Act, a game-changer, makes the carbon market more transparent and accessible for smaller operations. This regulatory shift not only offers feasible pathways for smaller farms to participate in carbon markets but also underscores their crucial role in contributing to environmental sustainability

Companies are not just looking to reduce emissions along their supply chains through on-farm reductions and removals—known as Scope 3 reductions or insets. They are also offering economic benefits. Smaller farms can now influence their carbon footprint, cooperatives, and the broader market. This new landscape not only allows farms of all sizes to adopt sustainable practices but also opens doors to economic benefits, sparking hope and motivation in the agriculturalcommunity.

Leveling the Playing Field: California’s Voluntary Carbon Market Disclosure Act Unveils New Opportunities for Farms of All Sizes 

California’s Voluntary Carbon Market Disclosure Act is a pivotal regulation injecting essential transparency into carbon offset markets. This legislation mandates that entities provide clear and comprehensive information about the offsets they sell, thus enhancing the credibility and reliability of carbon credits. Detailed disclosures about each carbon credit’s origin, type, and confirmation create a transparent marketplace for buyers and sellers. 

This shift presents new opportunities for farms of all sizes to engage in carbon accounting and benefit from carbon credit initiatives. Smaller farms, traditionally excluded due to market complexities, can now participate confidently by standardizing information and reducing ambiguity. This transparency allows small to medium-sized farms to verify their carbon credits and access potential buyers, unlocking avenues for additional revenue streams

The act provides the assurance needed to invest in and partner with smaller agricultural operations for larger corporate buyers, facilitating Scope 3 emission reductions across supply chains. This regulation not only democratizes the carbon credit market but also inspires comprehensive participation and collaboration across farm sizes. By embracing these changes, farms not only enhance sustainability and gain economically but also contribute meaningfully to global emission reduction targets, making them feel part of a larger mission.

Driving Sustainability with Scope 3 Reductions and On-Farm Insets 

Scope 3 reductions target the indirect emissions in a company’s value chain, covering production, transportation, and logistics activities. In agriculture, these emissions are linked to getting products from farm to consumer. Insets are on-farm projects designed to cut these Scope 3 emissions within the supply chain instead of using external offsets. 

Organizations are investing more in on-farm reductions to meet emission targets. Companies foster sustainability and innovation in agriculture by supporting projects that lower enteric methane emissions, streamline feed production, and improve manure management. This approach helps them meet corporate social responsibility goals and promotes efficient and eco-friendly farming methods. 

Farms can significantly benefit from these projects through improved sustainability, lower carbon footprints, and new revenue from carbon credits. Cooperatives can offer better value to members, advocate for collective sustainability, and gain more market power. Consumer brands can boost their reputation and trust by showing a real commitment to environmental impact reduction. This holistic approach ensures that the entire supply chain works towards a sustainable and resilient agricultural industry.

Comprehensive Emission Sources and Mitigation Strategies in Dairy Farming

Dairy operations face significant on-farm emissions from enteric methane, manure management, and feed production. Enteric methane, produced during ruminant digestion, is an important issue but can be mitigated with innovative feed additives. Manure management requires infrastructure but is essential for reducing emissions. Sustainable feed production practices are crucial, such as reducing nitrogen fertilizer, cover cropping, and better grazing techniques. 

Other emissions stem from energy use, both direct and from purchased electricity. There’s also great potential for carbon removals through soil carbon sequestration, afforestation, and silvopasture, which can offset emissions and improve the ecological footprint of dairy farming.

Revolutionizing Methane Reduction: Harnessing Feed Supplements and Seaweed Additives in Dairy Farming 

Enteric methane emissions projects offer innovative solutions for reducing methane output from dairy operations. By using feed supplements and seaweed additives, these projects aim to decrease the methane produced during digestion. Various supplements, including seaweed, have been shown to cut emissions effectively. With many already in different approval stages, the regulatory landscape is evolving to accommodate these alternatives. 

One key advantage of these projects is their simplicity, requiring minimal record-keeping. This makes them an appealing, practical choice for dairy farms of all sizes. 

Organizations often help offset the cost of these supplements, thanks to their interest in the carbon benefits. Financial incentives reduce the initial investment and provide ongoing economic benefits, allowing dairy farmers to integrate these methane-reducing interventions easily.

Innovative Approaches to Methane Reduction in Dairy: Leveraging Feed Supplements and Seaweed Additives

Enteric methane emissions projects offer practical solutions to cut methane output from dairy operations using feed supplements and seaweed additives. These dietary changes can significantly reduce methane produced during digestion. Many of these supplements are progressing through regulatory approval stages. 

These projects are easy to implement and require minimal record-keeping, making them an attractive option for dairy farms of all sizes. 

Financially, organizations often cover the cost of these supplements in exchange for carbon benefits, reducing initial investment for farmers and offering ongoing economic advantages.

Unlocking the Dual Benefits of Carbon Sequestration: Ecological Stewardship and Economic Gain on Farms

Carbon sequestration involves capturing and storing atmospheric carbon dioxide, reducing greenhouse gases. This can be achieved on farms through soil carbon sequestration and forestry initiatives. Practices like cover cropping, reduced tillage, and organic matter additions enhance soil’s carbon storage ability while planting trees and integrating silvopasture systems increase carbon storage above ground. 

These efforts require long-term monitoring to ensure permanence, as disruptions can release stored carbon into the atmosphere. Rigorous measurement and verification are essential to validate carbon credits. 

Participating in carbon sequestration projects is not just about environmental stewardship. It’s also a smart financial move for farmers. These projects create additional revenue streams through the sale of verified carbon credits, providing a tangible return on their sustainability efforts. This blend of ecological stewardship and economic gain underscores the potential of carbon sequestration for farms of all sizes.

The Bottom Line

Participating in carbon accounting projects offers numerous advantages beyond environmental benefits. These initiatives can improve farm sustainability, aligning practices with ecological and community resilience. They help reduce the farm’s carbon footprint through precise emission tracking and targeted mitigation strategies. Financially, they provide opportunities for additional revenue through efficiencies and selling carbon credits, turning environmental efforts into profitable ventures. Farmers are encouraged to explore these opportunities and understand project requirements to maximize benefits and lead in sustainable agriculture.

Key Takeaways:

  • Larger farms have historically dominated the carbon credit market, but new regulations and project types are leveling the playing field for smaller farms.
  • California’s Voluntary Carbon Market Disclosure Act mandates transparency for entities selling carbon offsets, fostering greater understanding and involvement across all farm sizes.
  • Organizations are investing in on-farm reductions and removals to meet Scope 3 emissions targets, impacting the entire supply chain, including cooperatives, brands, and retailers.
  • Dairy farms primarily emit carbon through enteric methane, manure management, and feed production, with additional emissions from energy use.
  • Enteric methane reduction projects involving feed supplements and seaweed additives are emerging but require minimal record keeping and come with financial incentives.
  • Feed production enhancements like nitrogen fertilizer reduction, cover crops, reduced tillage, and improved grazing practices offer viable pathways for both carbon offsets and insets.
  • Carbon sequestration projects involving soil, forestry or silvopasture require long-term monitoring but provide substantial ecological and economic benefits.
  • Participating in these projects not only promotes sustainability and reduces the carbon footprint of farms but also potentially increases revenue through efficiencies and the sale of carbon credits.

Summary: 

California’s Voluntary Carbon Market Disclosure Act is a significant step in making the carbon market more transparent and accessible for smaller operations. The act mandates entities to provide clear information about offsets they sell, enhancing the credibility and reliability of carbon credits. This transparency allows small to medium-sized farms to verify their carbon credits and access potential buyers, unlocking avenues for additional revenue streams. The act also provides assurance needed to invest in and partner with smaller agricultural operations for larger corporate buyers, facilitating Scope 3 emission reductions across supply chains. Scope 3 reductions target indirect emissions in a company’s value chain, covering production, transportation, and logistics activities. Companies are investing more in on-farm reductions to meet emission targets and foster sustainability and innovation in agriculture. Dairy operations face significant on-farm emissions from enteric methane, manure management, and feed production. Innovative feed additives, sustainable practices, and financial incentives can help mitigate emissions. Farmers are encouraged to explore opportunities and understand project requirements to lead in sustainable agriculture.

Learn more:

To delve deeper into the emerging opportunities and sustainability practices in dairy farming, consider exploring these related articles: 

Send this to a friend