Archive for economic concerns

Why EU Dairy Farmers Are on High Alert Over China’s New Trade Probe

Why are EU dairy farmers worried about China’s new trade probe? Learn how it could affect cheese, milk, and cream exports here.

Summary: Are you keeping an eye on the global market? If so, you might have noticed a new storm brewing. Recently, China announced an anti-subsidy probe on EU dairy imports, targeting essential commodities like cheese, milk, and cream. This move came hot on the EU’s decision to raise tariffs on Chinese electric vehicles. As the tit-for-tat trade measures continue, European dairy farmers might be on edge, particularly those from Ireland and the Netherlands. Could this intensify the financial strain on the dairy sector, which is already grappling with a volatile market? According to Tadhg Buckley of the Irish Farmers’ Association, this could affect €45 million worth of Irish exports. The European Union Chamber of Commerce in China expressed concern about the increasing economic tensions between the EU and China, urging member firms to cooperate fully with the investigation. Dutch dairy cooperativeFrieslandCampina has admitted the anti-subsidy probe, demonstrating their willingness to cooperate and adhere to international trade regulations.

  • China’s anti-subsidy probe on EU dairy imports targets essential commodities like cheese, milk, and cream.
  • This probe follows the EU’s decision to raise tariffs on Chinese electric vehicles, escalating trade tensions.
  • European dairy farmers may face increased financial strain, especially from Ireland and the Netherlands.
  • Tadhg Buckley of the Irish Farmers’ Association states the investigation could impact €45 million worth of Irish exports.
  • The European Union Chamber of Commerce in China urges member firms to cooperate fully with the investigation.
  • Dutch dairy cooperative FrieslandCampina expresses willingness to comply with the anti-subsidy probe.
European Union, EU, tariff proposal, Chinese-made electric cars, EVs, Beijing, taxes, anti-subsidy probe, EU dairy imports, cheese, milk, cream goods, trade tit-for-tat, economic concerns, world powers, European Union Chamber of Commerce in China, economic tensions, member firms, investigation, FrieslandCampina, Dutch dairy cooperative, China, international trade regulations, Irish Farmers' Association, Tadhg Buckley, targeted items, Irish dairy exports, economic consequences, China's anti-subsidy investigation, EU dairy imports, examination, significant numbers, expert perspectives, €1.7 billion, overall EU exports, ChinaEuropean Union, EU, tariff proposal, Chinese-made electric cars, EVs, Beijing, taxes, anti-subsidy probe, EU dairy imports, cheese, milk, cream goods, trade tit-for-tat, economic concerns, world powers, European Union Chamber of Commerce in China, economic tensions, member firms, investigation, FrieslandCampina, Dutch dairy cooperative, China, international trade regulations, Irish Farmers' Association, Tadhg Buckley, targeted items, Irish dairy exports, economic consequences, China's anti-subsidy investigation, EU dairy imports, examination, significant numbers, expert perspectives, €1.7 billion, overall EU exports, China
European Union, EU, tariff proposal, Chinese-made electric cars, EVs, Beijing, taxes, anti-subsidy probe, EU dairy imports, cheese, milk, cream goods, trade tit-for-tat, economic concerns, world powers, European Union Chamber of Commerce in China, economic tensions, member firms, investigation, FrieslandCampina, Dutch dairy cooperative, China, international trade regulations, Irish Farmers’ Association, Tadhg Buckley, targeted items, Irish dairy exports, economic consequences, China’s anti-subsidy investigation, EU dairy imports, examination, significant numbers, expert perspectives, €1.7 billion, overall EU exports, China

Imagine discovering that one of your largest export markets has initiated an inquiry that may interrupt your company. This is the reality for EU dairy producers today. China, a major importer of European dairy goods, has launched an anti-subsidy investigation into cheese, milk, and cream from the European Union. But why should you be concerned? What implications does this have for your business? How may this affect your bottom line? Staying informed is critical in light of prospective tariffs that reduce product competitiveness, market access limitations, and significant revenue impacts. “Regrettably, the use of trade defense instruments by one government is increasingly being responded to seemingly in kind by the recipient government,” the European Union Chamber of Commerce in China said. So, how can you navigate these challenging times? Continue reading to discover out.

EU’s Tariff on Chinese EVs Sparks Retaliatory Dairy Probe: A Trade Tug-of-War

The European Union has amended its tariff proposal for Chinese-made electric cars (EVs), increasing potential punitive levies from 37.6% to 36.3%. This decision occurred after Beijing pressured Brussels to drop these taxes. The EU’s decision to preserve its EV sector accidentally prompted a retaliation from China. In response, China initiated an anti-subsidy probe into European Union dairy imports, emphasizing cheese, milk, and cream goods. These critical dairy products, designed for human consumption, are now the focus of a trade dispute, reflecting deeper economic concerns between the two world powers.

The Ripple Effect: How EU’s Tariffs on Chinese EVs Are Stirring Up the Dairy Industry 

The background to this emerging dairy problem is the EU’s recent decision to adjust tariffs on Chinese electric cars (EVs). Faced with a flood of competitively priced EVs from China, the European Commission took a daring step in early 2023. The goal is to protect the EU’s automobile sector while shielding local job possibilities from fierce competition.

Initially, the tariff was set at 37.6%. However, the amount was slightly changed to 36.3% to maintain the trade balance. This slight modification resulted in a substantial shift in trade ties between the two economic powerhouses. The amended plan was constructed despite Beijing’s requests that the EU remove the levies.

As a dairy farmer, why should you care about the EU’s decision to adjust tariffs on Chinese EVs? Because it has set off a chain reaction that affects you. The increased tariffs have led to a trade tit-for-tat with China, resulting in an anti-subsidy probe into EU dairy imports. This is a stark reminder of how interconnected global trade policies have become. Electric car tariffs are not just a problem for the automobile sector; it’s a strategic game with far-reaching consequences.

Industry’s Response to China’s Dairy Probe: Concerns and Cooperation 

The European Union Chamber of Commerce in China did not mince words when it expressed worry about the increasing economic tensions between the EU and China. Given the EU’s recent ruling on Chinese EV tariffs, they argued that the tit-for-tat measures were not wholly unexpected. They highlighted the need for a fair and open inquiry and urged their member firms to assist thoroughly. Their attentiveness demonstrates the necessity of maintaining a balanced and fair commercial partnership.

FrieslandCampina, a Dutch dairy cooperative with significant economic interests in China, has taken a proactive stance in response to the anti-subsidy probe. A representative for the firm stated, “Naturally, we will provide the necessary information related to the investigation if requested, as well as by-laws and regulations.” This proactive position demonstrates FrieslandCampina’s commitment to international trade regulations and willingness to cooperate fully with the investigation.

The Irish Farmers’ Association, represented by Tadhg Buckley, expressed particular concerns about the targeted items. Buckley said that the investigation focuses on cheese and cream, which accounted for a significant share of Irish dairy exports to China last year. “If the investigation remains as it stands…it’s 45 million euros worth of product, but if it expanded outside into powders, it would certainly be a much different and much more significant issue for Ireland,” he said. The association’s scheduled trade mission to China demonstrates its proactive attitude to the probe and protecting its market interests.

Anticipating The Economic Fallout: How China’s Probe Could Rock EU’s Dairy Sector

Anticipating the economic consequences of China’s anti-subsidy investigation into EU dairy imports requires a thorough examination of numerous significant numbers and expert perspectives. EU dairy exports to China constitute about €1.7 billion annually, accounting for a small percentage of overall EU exports to China. While these figures may indicate a limited immediate effect, the implications are far-reaching for particular areas of the EU dairy business.

The stakes are high for Irish dairy producers. Last year, Ireland exported roughly €45 million in cheese, cream, and allied goods to China. If the probe results in higher tariffs or more restrictive measures, the impact might extend beyond these shipments, hurting the more significant dairy sector and specialist nutritional powders, which account for most of Ireland’s exports to China.

Jacob Gunter, Lead Economy Analyst at the Mercator Institute for China Studies, emphasizes this: “Even if duties rise to the point where all dairy commerce is effectively halted, the impact on EU exports would be minimal. However, the pain will be felt more sharply in the largest exporters to China, including Irish butter, Finnish milk powder, Spanish Manchego, and Italian Parmigiano Reggiano” [source]. This attitude is shared by other EU member states, illustrating the unequal effect distribution based on product kinds and amounts exported.

Furthermore, France, which sold $211 million in dairy goods to China last year, faces the possibility of severe disruption. The French dairy sector, the largest EU exporter of dairy products to China, must prepare for significant changes in trade dynamics. This vulnerability highlights a more prominent issue within the EU’s agricultural structure: individual nations’ economic health depends on specialized export connections.

While the overall economic effect on the EU may be minor, individual economies that rely significantly on dairy exports to China must prepare for unexpected disruptions. Strategic changes and export market diversification may be required to offset these risks.

Rising Tariffs: Can EU Dairy Producers Weather the Storm?

One immediate result of the probe might be a considerable increase in Chinese tariffs on EU dairy imports. If this happens, staples like butter and milk, currently under intense competition from local and overseas suppliers, may become prohibitively costly for Chinese consumers. This might result in a significant decrease in demand for these commodities, consequently affecting income streams for EU producers.

Specialized cheeses and premium dairy products from Europe may suffer a different destiny. While some items have distinct tastes and qualities that are difficult to imitate elsewhere, customers in China may still find them too expensive if tariffs increase significantly. Producers of high-end products like Italian Parmigiano Reggiano or French Roquefort would have to look for other markets to offset the loss.

Increased tariffs may also provide opportunities for rivals from the United States, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand. These nations often provide high-quality dairy products at lower rates. Countries with well-established dairy industries, such as New Zealand and Australia, may use this chance to increase their market share in China at the cost of the EU.

Therefore, EU dairy farmers must diversify their market tactics. Improving commercial links with other areas and marketing their distinct product offers may help offset losses. Adapting rapidly to these developments will be critical to maintaining business during trade tensions.

Strategic Moves: How EU and Irish Authorities are Tackling China’s Dairy Probe Head-On

Given the significance of China’s anti-subsidy inquiry into EU dairy imports, both EU and Irish authorities responded immediately and strategically. A concerted effort is ongoing to handle these international trade challenges thoroughly and openly.

The European Union has diversified, stressing collaboration and conformity with World Trade Organization (WTO) standards. The European Union Chamber of Commerce in China emphasized the need for fair and transparent investigations, reaffirming the EU’s commitment to free and rules-based commerce.

On the Irish front, officials are also proactive. Charlie McConalogue, Ireland’s Minister of Agriculture, Food, and the Marine, has been vociferous about his plans to limit the possible effects. McConalogue said: “I will be engaging with the EU Commission to ensure that it has all of the data necessary in Ireland to resolve any issues raised in the proposed investigation.” He added: “In this regard, I am satisfied that European and Irish dairy exports fully comply with World Trade Organisation Rules.”

The EU’s plan involves creating substantial paperwork to establish conformity with international rules. This endeavor is consistent with McConalogue’s commitment to providing extensive information and statistics on the conformance of Irish and EU dairy exports to WTO requirements.

Furthermore, the Irish government has organized a trade mission to China, which will go there at the end of the month. This delegation intends to interact directly with Chinese officials, giving facts and arguments to dispute the assertions motivating the probe. This expedition demonstrates Ireland’s proactive approach and commitment to preserving strong commercial ties amid escalating tensions.

The emphasis on data-driven solutions and diplomatic interaction suggests that the EU and Ireland are addressing urgent issues while also attempting to strengthen their trade rules and procedures against future problems. This complete strategy exemplifies the flexibility and resilience needed in today’s challenging global trading environment.

Lessons from History: Trade Tensions Between the EU and China 

To properly understand the significance of the present dairy issue, consider the history of trade disputes between the EU and China. Trade disputes between these enormous economic zones are not uncommon. For example, one major dispute erupted over solar panels. In 2013, the EU levied anti-dumping charges on Chinese solar panels, claiming that Chinese manufacturers were selling them below market value, which was considered unfair to European companies. China replied by opening an anti-dumping investigation into European wine, jeopardizing millions of euros in trade.

In 2020, China imposed anti-dumping tariffs on stainless steel items from the EU in response to a European inquiry into Chinese steel imports. The ensuing tariffs severely disrupted supply networks and raised manufacturing costs for many EU enterprises. These incidents demonstrate a tit-for-tat pattern in which one entity’s trade defense measures trigger retaliatory steps from the other, resulting in an expanding cycle of trade barriers.

Understanding these previous tensions provides a prism to examine the present dairy investigation. It’s part of a repeating storyline in which economic giants use trade policy to protect home sectors or gain geopolitical influence. Such arguments have far-reaching consequences. They go beyond direct financial consequences. Persistent trade conflicts may strain diplomatic ties, disrupt global supply networks, and create a climate of uncertainty for companies. Indeed, when dairy farmers and producers see these changes, the need for strategic adaptation and broad market diversification becomes clear, ensuring they are not disproportionately subject to future trade disputes.

The Bottom Line

As we learn more about the ongoing dairy trade conflict, it becomes evident that EU dairy producers face a new, rugged terrain. The back-and-forth tariffs between the EU and China have created the potential for substantial disruptions. Uncertainty looms, and European authorities and business leaders keenly watch the situation.

China’s expanding domestic dairy output and the increased competitiveness of alternatives from other nations complicate the scenario even more. The impact of punitive tariffs will be felt most acutely by prominent exporters, especially those specializing in high-end and less-replaceable dairy products.

So, how will you, as a dairy farmer, adjust to these prospective changes? What techniques can you use to offset the effects of these tariffs? Now is the moment to weigh your alternatives and prepare for a secure future. Share your methods and ideas in the comments section below, or contact industry forums to explore possible solutions.

Learn more: 

Bird Flu Undercounted in US Dairy Cattle: Farmers Avoid Testing Due to Economic Fears

Why are US dairy farmers skipping bird flu tests? Learn how economic worries might be hiding the true number of cases. Curious? Read more now.

Summary: What’s really happening on America’s dairy farms? A startling undercurrent lurks beneath official bird flu numbers. Dairy farmers across the U.S. are avoiding tests, driven by fear of economic setbacks and skepticism about the real threat of the virus. Since March, the USDA has identified bird flu in 190 dairy herds across 13 states, but experts believe this is just the tip of the iceberg. Joe Armstrong, a veterinarian from the University of Minnesota, estimates the true number of affected farms could be three to five times higher due to widespread underreporting. With cases in states like Colorado, Michigan, and Minnesota likely being significantly undercounted, the lack of comprehensive testing poses a severe risk to both the dairy industry and public health. Terry Dye, a farmer from Colorado, confessed, “Sometimes it’s more convenient to not know.” The reluctance to test isn’t just about ignorance or distrust; it’s about survival. Farmers fear a positive result could mean devastating economic consequences, including quarantine measures that restrict their ability to sell milk or cattle. The FDA has found inactive bird flu virus particles in 17% of U.S. dairy products, though pasteurization ensures these products remain safe for consumption. As the USDA prepares to expand bird flu testing, the question remains: will farmers participate, or will economic fears continue to cloud the true scope of this outbreak?

  • Dairy farmers across the U.S. are avoiding bird flu tests due to economic fears and skepticism about the virus.
  • The USDA has identified bird flu in 190 dairy herds in 13 states since March, but experts believe that number is significantly underreported.
  • Joe Armstrong from the University of Minnesota estimates the actual number of affected farms could be three to five times higher.
  • Inactive bird flu virus particles have been found in 17% of U.S. dairy products, though pasteurization ensures safety for consumption.
  • Farmers fear a positive test result could lead to severe economic setbacks, including quarantine measures and restrictions on selling milk or cattle.
  • The USDA is planning to expand bird flu testing among dairy cattle, but it’s uncertain if farmers will comply due to economic concerns.
  • Comprehensive testing is essential to accurately understand the outbreak and implement effective control measures to protect public health.
avian flu, dairy cattle, underreported, economic concerns, decreased monitoring, farms, affected, infected, testing, United States, capacity, potential human spread, fear, mistrust, misconceptions, economic hardship, positive test, early diagnosis, milk sales restrictions, cow sales restrictions, farmers, testing techniques, incentives, distrust, government incentives, financial assistance, losses, perception of risk, avian flu pandemic, severity, figures, limited testing, farmer reticence, control the spread, public safety, bird flu testing, change approach, dairy cattle, states, Colorado, mandatory raw-milk testing, identify outbreaks, contain effectively

Have you ever wondered why avian flu in dairy cattle isn’t making as much news anymore? The truth may startle you. Farmers around the United States are skipping testing owing to economic concerns, resulting in a significant undercount of cases. While we have 190 official positive herds, there are many, many, many more farms that are impacted or infected that are just not testing. The results of testing restricted government incentives, and decreased monitoring undermined the United States’ capacity to react to possible human spread.

StateReported HerdsUndercounted EstimateComments
Minnesota927-45Likely 3-5 times higher than reported
Michigan2736+Undercount by at least a third
Colorado63UnknownState officials implemented weekly testing
Wisconsin0UnknownDairy farmers unlikely to test
Oklahoma1UnknownDelayed testing confirmed the outbreak

Fear, Mistrust, and Misconceptions: The Real Reasons Behind Farmers Shunning Bird Flu Testing

Why would farmers risk the health of their herds and the public by not testing for bird flu? The answer could be more straightforward. 

  • Economic Hardship: For many farmers, the financial consequences of a positive avian flu test exceed the advantages of early diagnosis. When an epidemic is verified, milk and cow sales restrictions might last many weeks, if not longer. This stop in sales may result in a heavy financial load, making it impossible for farmers to continue operations. Many farmers are hesitant to test their herds due to the possibility of economic hardship.
  • Distrust in Government Incentives: Farmers distrust the government’s compensation plans. Many believe the incentives and financial assistance do not fully compensate for the significant losses sustained due to testing and possibly positive findings. Farmers are skeptical of government help and hesitate to employ testing techniques even with incentives.
  • Perception of Risk: Another significant component is how people perceive the infection. Some farmers do not believe the avian flu poses a substantial danger to their dairy cows. This attitude is based on disinformation, the absence of observable signs in their cattle, and a historical emphasis on bird populations as the major worry. As a result of this view, many people avoid testing because they believe the dangers are minor or nonexistent.

Industry Experts Warn: The True Extent of the Bird Flu Outbreak in Dairy Cattle Might Be Alarmingly Underreported 

Industry experts have expressed grave worries about the understated severity of the avian flu pandemic in dairy animals. These experts encourage a deeper look at the figures concealed behind limited testing and farmer reticence.

Joe Armstrong, a veterinarian and cattle specialist at the University of Minnesota, provides a sharp viewpoint.

‘While we have nine certified positives, there are many, many more farms harmed or infected that are not being tested.’ Armstrong’s findings show that the number of infections may be substantially more significant than reported, maybe three to five times the statistics in Minnesota alone.

Phil Durst from Michigan State University has similar ideas. He believes that Michigan’s statistics are likely an underestimate.

‘Michigan’s 27 positive herds are likely an undercount of at least one-third.’ This troubling disparity demonstrates a more significant trend of underreporting and the need for more stringent testing standards.

Jenna Guthmiller, an associate professor of immunology at the University of Colorado, concurs, citing significant gaps in the reported instances.

‘Colorado’s 63 positive herds are also likely an underestimate.’ Guthmiller’s findings emphasize the urgent need for more monitoring and openness.

These expert viewpoints provide light on the vital issue of avian flu underreporting in the dairy business, implying a far more significant problem than current data indicate.

Farmer Reluctance: Delaying the Inevitable

A Colorado farmer, Terry Dye, encountered the unpleasant reality of avian flu when his two dairies were afflicted this summer. His first efforts to handle the matter privately to prevent governmental action were unsuccessful. “Sometimes it’s more convenient not to know,” Dye confessed. Eventually, state agricultural inspectors discovered the diseases and confined his animals, implementing the steps he intended to avoid.

In Kansas, Jason Schmidt expressed a perspective that many in the sector shared. “There’s plenty of dairy farms that I’ve heard about that just don’t believe it,” he told me. This skepticism about the virus and its consequences adds to a reluctance to do testing, prolonging the cycle of underreporting.

Meanwhile, veterinarian Mark Hardesty summed up a typical attitude among dairy farmers in Ohio with a harsh saying. “The long-standing proverb is that the remedy for fever is not to take a temperature. So, if we don’t test, we aren’t positive,” he said. This approach reflects a larger aversion to proactive testing and the difficulties in determining the exact scope of the epidemic.

The Long-Term Economic Impacts of Ignoring Comprehensive Testing

Ignoring the requirement for extensive testing may save some short-term expenditures, but have you considered the long-term economic consequences? Failure to detect and manage avian flu early on may result in bigger, more destructive epidemics. These outbreaks may shut down whole dairy-producing areas, affecting farmers and supply networks.

  • Widespread Quarantines: Imagine mandatory quarantines that prevent the movement of milk and cattle. This scenario isn’t just a nightmare for individual farmers; it has the power to weaken regional economies.
  • Decreased Consumer Confidence: Consumer confidence could plummet if word gets out that bird flu is rampant in the dairy industry. Lower demand leads to lower prices, affecting everyone from farm owners to grocery store suppliers.
  • Market Volatility: Sudden outbreaks can lead to unpredictable market conditions without proper surveillance. Prices can fluctuate wildly, making planning and managing farm operations challenging.
  • Regulatory Consequences: Governments might impose stricter regulations and testing requirements, leading to higher farm operational costs and potentially driving smaller operations out of business.

Consider the broader picture: it’s not just your farm at stake but the entire dairy industry’s stability. Procrastination on proper testing could turn manageable issues into industry-wide crises.

Revolutionizing Bird Flu Surveillance in Dairy Cattle: The Path Forward 

There’s a clear need to change how we approach bird flu testing in dairy cattle. To better control the spread and ensure public safety, the following measures should be considered: 

  • Mandate Raw-Milk Testing: More states must follow Colorado’s lead and implement mandatory raw-milk testing. This would help identify outbreaks sooner and contain them more effectively.
  • Increase Compensation: Higher compensation for farmers is crucial. It can offset the economic hardships they fear when testing positive, making them more likely to participate in testing programs.
  • Improve Education: Better education efforts are needed to address farmers’ distrust and misinformation. Clear, factual information about the risks of bird flu to cattle and humans can help build trust and cooperation.

Learning from Global Leaders: How Other Countries Effectively Manage Bird Flu in Dairy Cattle 

The U.S. is not alone in grappling with the challenges of monitoring and controlling bird flu in dairy cattle. Other countries have faced similar outbreaks and have adopted different strategies to manage the situation more effectively. 

  • European Union: The EU has strict regulations for monitoring and controlling bird flu among livestock. These include mandatory regular testing and rigorous biosecurity measures. The EU compensates farmers adequately to encourage timely reporting and transparency. These measures have helped EU countries maintain tighter control over the spread of the virus.
  • Japan: Japan experienced significant bird flu outbreaks and responded by implementing comprehensive monitoring systems, including mandatory testing and culling infected animals. The Japanese government works closely with local farmers to provide financial support and education on best biosecurity practices, fostering a culture of cooperation and compliance.
  • Australia: Australia proactively approaches managing livestock diseases, including bird flu. They leverage advanced technology for real-time surveillance and state-wide reporting systems to track outbreaks quickly. Farmers receive substantial compensation for economic losses, encouraging them to report and test without fearing financial ruin.

These international examples illustrate how coordinated efforts between governments and farmers, strong financial incentives, and robust surveillance systems can lead to more effective management of bird flu outbreaks. The U.S. could benefit from adopting similar strategies to enhance bird flu surveillance and control measures.

FAQs: Common Concerns and Misconceptions about Bird Flu in Dairy Cattle 

  1. Can bird flu jump from birds to dairy cattle? 
    Yes, it can. Since March, the U.S. Department of Agriculture has confirmed the presence of bird flu in about 190 dairy herds across 13 states. The virus is usually transmitted through contact with infected birds or contaminated environments.
  2. Is bird flu in dairy cattle a severe health concern for humans? 
    Limited evidence suggests that bird flu in dairy cattle poses a severe health risk to humans. However, its potential to adapt and spread among humans heightens concerns. As of this year, 13 cases of workers infected with bird flu have been reported. 
  3. Why are farmers reluctant to test their herds for bird flu? 
    Farmers often avoid testing due to the economic consequences of a positive result, such as restrictions on selling milk or cattle. Some also doubt the virus’s severity or find that government incentives do not sufficiently offset their expected losses.
  4. Does pasteurization kill the bird flu virus in milk? 
    Yes, pasteurization effectively kills the bird flu virus in milk. The FDA has confirmed that milk and other pasteurized dairy products remain safe to consume despite inactive viral particles in some products.
  5. How can farmers protect their dairy herds from bird flu?
    1. Implementing robust biosecurity measures, such as limiting contact between cattle and wild birds.
    2. Regularly testing raw milk supplies to detect the virus early.
    3. Working closely with veterinarians to observe and quickly address any signs of illness in the herd.
    4. Participating in government-supported testing and compensation programs.
  6. What should be done if a dairy herd tests positive for bird flu? 
    Farmers should notify state agriculture officials immediately to manage the outbreak effectively. Infected herds typically need to be quarantined, and affected farmers may qualify for compensation for veterinary care and lost milk production. 

The Bottom Line

The underreporting of avian flu in dairy cattle is a time bomb. Farmers’ reluctance to test, motivated by economic concerns and mistrust, might have far-reaching implications. It is time for the sector to take proactive steps to protect our food supply and our communities’ well-being. How will you defend your herd and your livelihood?

Learn more: 

Send this to a friend