Archive for Dairy Breeding

Lucky or Calculated? The Surprising Truth About Genomics and Luck in Dairy Breeding

Can genomics eliminate luck in dairy breeding? Discover how chance shaped Holstein’s history and why unpredictability still impacts your herd today.

I’ve always been fascinated by that eternal question in dairy breeding: can science and technology eliminate the role of luck? With April 2025’s genetic evaluation updates just around the corner, it feels like the perfect time to dig into whether our fancy genomic tools have truly kicked chance to the curb—or if they’ve just given us better ways to dance with it. After talking with industry experts and diving into the research, I’ve discovered something surprising: some of Holstein’s most influential bloodlines emerged from happy accidents that no amount of genomic testing could have predicted.

The Genomics Revolution vs. Lady Luck

Let’s be honest—whenever we talk about breeding success these days, we can’t help but focus on genomic selection, advanced mating programs, and all those impressive reproductive technologies. I mean, how couldn’t we? These tools have transformed our industry.

The April 2025 genetic evaluation updates are coming fast, with revised lifetime merit indices that shift to the 2020 genetic base. Have you been keeping up with the Council on Dairy Cattle Breeding announcements? They’re projecting some major PTA decreases: -750 pounds of milk, -45 pounds of fat, and -30 pounds of protein for Holsteins.

Don’t panic! As Chuck Sattler from Select Sires explained recently, “The 2025 base change is bigger than previous adjustments, but this is good news! It means that our cows are improving faster than ever.”

But here’s what keeps me up at night: Have we eliminated Lady Luck from the breeding equation? Or have we just given her a shiny new genomic lab coat?

The 75% Solution: What Genomics Can (and Can’t) Tell Us

I was digging through some research recently and found something fascinating from the National Center for Biotechnology Information. Our most advanced genomic prediction tools show only about 75% reliability for production traits. That means a quarter of what makes a cow productive remains outside our ability to predict!

This 75% reliability has been consistent for years. A 2011 Journal of Dairy Science study noted that this level is “adequate for marketing semen of 2-yr-old bulls,” but it’s far from perfect. The primary benefit? A shortened generation interval that increases the rate of genetic improvement.

Think about that 25% gap next time you’re making breeding decisions. It’s not just a tiny margin of error—it’s a significant space where luck, chance, and unexplained genetic interactions still reign supreme.

Lucky Breaks That Shaped Holstein History

You know what’s crazy? Looking back through Holstein’s history, some of the breed’s most influential genetic lines happened because of tiny accidents, missed connections, or just plain dumb luck. I’ve collected four of my favorite examples in this table:

Lucky Break EventWhat Actually HappenedWhat Could Have HappenedResulting Influential Sire/DamLong-term Impact
Missing TelephoneSpring Brook Bess Burke sold to George MillerWould have been purchased by LashbrookLed to Osborndale Ivanhoe, Elevation, Starbuck, AerostarShaped modern Holstein genetics
Injured LegMontvic Chieftain injured, Pathfinder offered insteadWhitney would have taken ChieftainRound Oak Rag Apple ElevationFoundation of influential bloodlines
Change of ClothesVisitors saw Temple Farm May while Dunton changedMight never have noticed the cowA.B.C. Reflection SovereignOne of the breed’s most respected sires
Wrong SemenInseminator arrived without Pabst Walker semenTiny Supreme DeKol would have been bred differentlyAlmerson Sovereign SupremeHighly respected Canadian bull line

No Phone, No Starbuck? The Wild Story of the Missing Call

I can’t get over this first story—it blows my mind whenever I think about it. In the early 1900s, A.J. Lashbrook and his brother sold some inherited shares for $250 (not exactly chump change) to invest in Holstein cattle.

Their father spotted three gorgeous heifer calves at Spring Brook Farm, priced at $75 each. I mean, imagine that kind of deal today!

But get this—they didn’t have a telephone to confirm the purchase! So Dad had to return the next day, only to find that the calves had already been sold to George Miller. It turns out that Schilling, the Spring Brook Farm manager, had mentioned the calves to a local feed mill owner, who told Miller. Talk about bad timing!

One of those calves? Spring Brook Bess Burke. Miller raised them, bred them to Sir Johanna Canary DeKol, and sold them to F.C. Schroeder of Moorhead, Minnesota.

“Years later, Mr. Schroeder visited our herd and, when I took him back to the depot, remarked that Spring Brook Bess Burke 2nd was born in a box car just as the train passed the depot after leaving the stockyards,” said Lashbrook.

She eventually found her way to E.C. Schroeder in Minnesota, where she and her daughter made incredible production records when bred to Sir Pietertje Ormsby Mercedes.

Lashbrook later reflected (and I love this quote): “As I look back now, it was indeed fortunate that we did not have a telephone and that those calves never came to our farm. We were only small breeders and… probably never would have developed those cows.”

Here’s the kicker—without that missing telephone, there would have been no Osborndale Ivanhoe, no Elevation, no Starbuck, and no Aerostar. Can you imagine modern Holstein genetics without those bulls? I sure can’t!

The Data Behind Modern Breeding: What Science Tells Us

While historical anecdotes are fascinating, let’s look at what the research says about genomic selection today. A 2020 study published by the National Center for Biotechnology Information found something that really caught my attention: inbreeding can significantly impact how well genomics works as a prediction tool.

The study examined high-producing primiparous dairy cows and found that individuals with an Inbreeding Index between ≥2.5 and ≤5.0 showed a two-fold increase in negative correlations between genomic predictions and actual performance. This affected critical traits, including Milk Production at 305 days, Protein Production, Fertility Index, and Daughter Pregnancy Rate.

What does this mean for your breeding program? Even with perfect genomic tools, factors like inbreeding can throw a massive wrench into the works. Your carefully selected mating might produce unexpected positive or negative results based on genetic interactions our current models can’t predict.

The Luckiest Injured Leg in Holstein History

I love this next story. F.C. Whitney had purchased Montvic Chieftain from T.B. Macaulay. But Chieftain slipped and injured his leg while loading the bull onto the truck. Bummer, right?

Macaulay called Whitney and told him they could have Montvic Pathfinder for the same price!

Now, Pathfinder wasn’t winning any beauty contests. Whitney’s description of him as “as homely a brute as a man ever saw” makes me laugh every time. But his pedigree? Absolutely stellar, with multiple All-American winners. As the text says, “Montvic Pathfinder, some claimed, possessed the best pedigree ever written,” including “four All-American wins to his credit, including aged cow in 1935 and 1936.”

Whitney decided to take a chance on the ugly duckling. At his farm in New York, Pathfinder sired Montvic Pathfinder Prizetaker, proven in the herd of Eugene and Clarence Harvey, Cincinnatus, N.Y. In making his switch from Jerseys to Holsteins, Charles Hope, Round Oak Farm, Purcellville, Va., over four years, purchased 17 Prizetaker daughters from the Harveys, as well as several Montvic Chieftain 6th calves and bought Montvic Pathfinder Prizetaker, himself. He used a son of his, Round Oak Montvic PF General, who sired Round Oak Millie Elizabeth, Elevation’s third dam.

So, luck again. Had Chieftain not banged up his leg, Pathfinder wouldn’t have gone to the United States, and there would have been no Round Oak Rag Apple Elevation.

The Preferential Treatment Problem

The latest research has revealed something that fascinates me: genomic predictions can be significantly biased by the preferential treatment of elite cows. A 2018 study published in the Journal of Dairy Science simulated what happens when elite bull dams receive special treatment.

The researchers found that it could significantly skew genomic predictions when just 5-20% of elite bull dams received preferential treatment (introducing an upward bias in their performance data). This is especially true for traits with low heritability, where the accuracy of genomic predictions is already challenging.

This research explains why sometimes the offspring of “sure thing” matings don’t perform as expected. The genomic values looked great on paper but may have been inflated by the special treatment of the cow families in the reference population. It’s another way chance enters our breeding programs—through human bias and the limitations of our measurement systems.

When Your AI Guy Says “Sorry, I’m Out”

How many times has this happened to you? You call your AI technician with the perfect mating all planned out, and they hit you with: “Sorry, I’m out of that bull’s semen today.”

One of those cows was Tiny Supreme DeKol! Aylmer Petherick had chosen Pabst Walker for Tiny’s next mating, but the inseminator, on the day he came to breed her, wasn’t carrying his semen. “What else have you got?” Aylmer asked. He settled on Hainescrest Sovereign Tycoon.

Almerson Sovereign Supreme, the result of the mating, was eventually classified as Excellent and received a Class Extra rating en route to becoming one of the most respected bulls in Canadian history. It was highly regarded by leading cattlemen of the day, including Pete Heffering and Dave Houck. What a great example of turning what is available into something great!

Who knows? Your backup choice today might create tomorrow’s game-changing bloodline. All those genomic tools might guide your primary selections, but chance still decides whether those straws are in your AI tank when needed.

The 25-35% Gap That Keeps Me Up at Night

Here’s what fascinates me about genomic selection: for all its revolutionary power, it still can’t predict everything. Not even close.

According to research published in the Journal of Dairy Science, current reliability percentages for genomically tested young animals typically hover between 65% and 75% for production traits and even lower for health and fertility traits.

That means that 25-35% of a cow’s genetic potential remains unpredictable through our current genomic models. That’s a huge gap!

Four main factors create this uncertainty:

  1. Gene interactions: Genomic models struggle to capture how genes influence each other. The same marker might perform differently depending on the overall genetic background.
  2. Environmental influences: How genes express themselves varies wildly in different environments. I’ve seen genetically identical cows perform completely differently on neighboring farms.
  3. Genetic recombination: Even with identical parents, each calf gets a unique genetic package. It’s like shuffling a deck of cards—you never deal the same hand twice.
  4. New mutations: Sometimes genetic changes appear absent in either parent, creating traits nobody predicted.

ROI on Genomic Testing: The Numbers Don’t Lie

Let’s talk dollars and cents for a minute. Despite the limitations, genomic testing has demonstrated impressive financial returns. Recent industry analyses suggest that genomic testing of heifers delivers approximately $75-$200 in additional lifetime profit per animal tested, primarily through improved selection decisions and optimized heifer inventory management.

The financial return varies based on several factors:

  • Current replacement costs in your area
  • Your herd’s genetic level relative to the breed
  • How aggressively do you cull based on genomic results
  • Whether you use sexed or beef semen strategically

Even with these impressive returns, the unpredictable 25-30% of genetic potential means some animals will significantly underperform or overperform their genomic predictions. This variability creates risk and opportunity—sometimes, your lowest-ranked genomic heifer produces your best cow. Ask any experienced breeder, and they’ll have at least one story like this!

The Change of Clothes That Changed Everything

This next story makes me smile every time. “Luck played a part, too, in the A.B.C. Reflection Sovereign story.” History might have taken a different course if he had waited for them on his front porch. Doug Dunton walked up from the stable in his barn clothes when they arrived. That September 1942, Jack Fraser, Elgin Armstrong, and Cliff Chant, his herdsman, had stopped at Dunton’s to scout up some cows for Armstrong’s A.B.C. Farm.”

“Wait a minute while I change my clothes,” said Dunton as he approached the house. His visitors sauntered down to the barn. As they walked, they passed a big, white Lonelm Texal Alcartra daughter named Temple Farm May, getting ready to calve. Before the day was out, Armstrong bought the cow for $400.00. Dunton agreed to keep her until she freshened. She was bred to Inka Supreme Reflection, and the calf was A.B.C. Inka May.

What a find! A.B.C. Inka May did everything right. She was a ferocious producer with an Honour List record of 24,141 lbs. milk, 4.67%, and 1,128 lbs. fat in 1947, the same year she was an All-Canadian four-year-old. But her supreme achievement was as dam of A.B.C. Reflection Sovereign (EX-Extra), who many claim was the best bull the breed has produced.

So yeah! Luck also influenced this bull’s genetics. Who knows what would have happened if Dunton had not changed then?

Hidden Gems Hiding in Plain Sight?

This makes me wonder—what excellent cows are we walking past daily, fixated on our genomic printouts?

With the April 2025 evaluation changes, we’re facing a significant recalibration of genetic values. According to the latest announcements I’ve seen, the Net Merit $ (NM$) index is getting a serious makeover: increased emphasis on butterfat (+13% weighting), greater focus on feed efficiency (41% higher combined impact), and doubled weighting for cow livability.

This reranking creates an opportunity to spot “hidden gems” that our current systems might be undervaluing. Are you only chasing the highest numbers, or are you developing that breeder’s eye to recognize special animals others might miss—just like Armstrong spotted value in Temple Farm May?

The best breeders I know combine data with that indefinable “cow sense” that no genomic test can replace.

Navigating the Balance: Genomics vs. Serendipity

Here’s how I think about the interplay between precision and chance in different aspects of breeding:

Aspect of BreedingHow Genomics Influences ItRole of Chance Still Present
Selection DecisionsIdentifies animals with superior genetic potential earlier and more accuratelyWhich animals you choose to test and develop still involves human judgment
Mating ChoicesPredicts outcomes of specific matings with greater precisionAvailability of preferred sires, conception success, and embryo viability remain variable
Trait PredictionsProvides reliable estimates for well-studied traits with high heritabilityNovel traits, gene interactions, and environmental influences remain less predictable
Health OutcomesIdentifies genetic predispositions to certain diseasesMany health events remain unpredictable despite genomic information
FertilityHelps select for improved reproductive traitsIndividual conception events remain highly variable
LongevityPredicts genetic components of productive lifeMany factors affecting actual lifespan remain outside genomic prediction
Elite Animal IdentificationAccelerates discovery of superior geneticsThe specific combinations that create truly exceptional animals still involve elements of chance

Gearing Up for April 2025: What You Need to Know

The latest genomic technology has improved prediction accuracy. I’ve been reading about these new machine-learning algorithms that better account for gene interactions and environmental factors. According to recent research in the Journal of Dairy Science, these models have boosted reliability percentages by about 5-7% for most traits.

That’s progress! But even with these improvements, we’re still looking at about 20-30% of genetic potential remaining unpredictable. And that unpredictable zone? That’s where luck—both good and bad—continues to play its role.

The April 2025 genetic evaluation updates will incorporate these improved models but won’t eliminate chance. According to The Bullvine’s recent report (which I highly recommend reading), we’ll need to recalibrate our sire selection thresholds—what used to be a +2000 NM$ will become approximately +1300 NM$. It’s going to take some mental adjustment for all of us.

4 Ways to Balance Science with Serendipity

As we get closer to the April 2025 genetic evaluations update, here are four strategies I’m recommending to my friends in the industry:

  1. Get familiar with the changes: Take time to understand the revised lifetime merit indices and that base change shift to cows born in 2020. Chuck Sattler from Select Sires advises: “The adjustments coming in April will mean you will likely need to recalibrate the selection levels used for A.I. sires and which cows are bred to beef or sexed semen.”
  2. Don’t put all your eggs in one genomic basket. The industry focuses on an increasingly narrow range of elite genetics. Consider incorporating some differently-bred Holstein cattle that offer unique genetic contributions. Genetic diversity provides more opportunities for unexpected combinations that sometimes create magic.
  3. Build in flexibility: What’s your Plan B when your first-choice matings aren’t possible? Those backup plans sometimes produce better results than the original! Avoid getting trapped in the mindset that there’s only one “right” mating for each animal.
  4. Trust your eyes, not just the numbers. While genomic testing provides incredibly valuable data, don’t lose that breeder’s instinct. The best operations I visited combined quantitative assessment with qualitative judgment—they used printouts and indefinable “cow sense.”

The Bottom Line

As we approach these April 2025 genetic evaluation updates, I keep returning to this fundamental truth: breeding success has always emerged from a blend of scientific precision and happy accidents.

Genomic selection gives us unprecedented insight into genetic potential. Still, the stories of Holstein’s most influential animals remind us that some of our greatest breeding successes came from unexpected turns of fate.

So, does genomic selection take the luck out of dairy breeding? Not a chance. Genomics has given us better tools to capitalize on luck when it strikes. The technology helps us identify promising animals earlier and more accurately. Still, it doesn’t eliminate the fundamental randomness involved in genetic recombination, gene expression, and the countless small decisions that shape breeding outcomes.

The lesson? Use every scientific tool, but keep your eyes open for those unexpected opportunities that genomics can’t predict. Use genomic testing to identify high-potential animals, study the upcoming changes to evaluation indices, and align your breeding program with your farm’s economic goals.

But never forget that sometimes, the most valuable genetic combination might emerge when your inseminator runs out of your first-choice semen, when visitors happen to notice a special cow while you’re changing clothes, or when a replacement bull offered due to an injury turns out to be a breed-defining sire.

Holstein history shows us that luck creates opportunities—but only those with the knowledge and vision to recognize potential can transform those opportunities into lasting genetic contributions. As you prepare for the changes in April 2025, keep one eye on the data and the other open to the possibilities that might lead to your herd’s next great success story.

Key Takeaways

  • Luck shapes breeding success: Historical examples like Spring Brook Bess Burke and Montvic Pathfinder show how chance created legendary Holstein sires.
  • Genomics isn’t perfect: Current tools offer up to 75% reliability for production traits, leaving room for unpredictability in genetic outcomes.
  • Prepare for April 2025 updates: Recalibrate sire selection thresholds as Net Merit $ indices shift focus toward butterfat, feed efficiency, and cow livability.
  • Flexibility matters: Backup mating plans and a keen breeder’s eye can uncover hidden gems that genomic data might overlook.
  • Balance science with serendipity: Use genomic tools strategically while staying open to unexpected opportunities that could transform your herd.

Executive Summary

Dairy breeding has come a long way with genomic selection, but luck remains an undeniable factor in shaping success. This article explores pivotal moments in Holstein history, like Spring Brook Bess Burke’s missed purchase, Montvic Pathfinder’s unexpected rise, and Temple Farm May’s discovery, to show how chance created breed-defining sires. Even today, genomic tools offer impressive reliability (up to 75%), yet factors like genetic recombination and environmental influences leave a 25-35% prediction gap. As the April 2025 genetic evaluation updates approach, breeders must balance precision with flexibility to capitalize on unexpected opportunities. From backup mating plans to spotting hidden gems, this article offers actionable strategies to navigate the intersection of science and serendipity in dairy breeding.

Learn more

Join the Revolution!

Join over 30,000 successful dairy professionals who rely on Bullvine Daily for their competitive edge. Delivered directly to your inbox each week, our exclusive industry insights help you make smarter decisions while saving precious hours every week. Never miss critical updates on milk production trends, breakthrough technologies, and profit-boosting strategies that top producers are already implementing. Subscribe now to transform your dairy operation’s efficiency and profitability—your future success is just one click away.

NewsSubscribe
First
Last
Consent

The $4,300 Gamble That Reshaped Global Dairy Industry: The Pawnee Farm Arlinda Chief Story

The $4,300 gamble revolutionized dairy farming: How one bull’s genes reshaped the Holstein breed and transformed global milk production forever.

Pawnee Farm Arlinda Chief didn’t just change dairy breeding—he completely rewrote what was possible for milk production in Holsteins. Born on May 9, 1962, this extraordinary bull revolutionized milk production capabilities worldwide, fundamentally altering the economics and genetic landscape of dairy farming. According to the 2020 Pedigree Analysis of Holstein Sires, Chief’s genetic influence exceeded that of any other sire except Elevation, with his genetic contribution estimated at 14.95. His story represents the tremendous potential of strategic selective breeding and the sobering reality of what happens when a single bloodline becomes too dominant.

Pawnee Farm Arlinda Chief, born May 9, 1962, stands as one of the most influential Holstein sires in history, contributing nearly 15% to the breed’s genome. His legacy revolutionized milk production and reshaped global dairy genetics.
Pawnee Farm Arlinda Chief, born May 9, 1962, stands as one of the most influential Holstein sires in history, contributing nearly 15% to the breed’s genome. His legacy revolutionized milk production and reshaped global dairy genetics.

The Visionary Breeder: Lester Fishler’s Holstein Legacy

The story of Chief begins with a visionary breeder whose remarkable eye for cattle would change dairy farming forever. Lester Fishler was no ordinary dairyman. Born near Morse Bluffs, Nebraska, in 1911, Fishler overcame early hardship—losing his father at age eight and his mother three years later—to become what industry experts would later describe as a “Holstein breeding wizard” who combined practical farming knowledge with a deep intellectual understanding of genetics.

Operating his Pawnee Farm on the southern edge of Central City, Nebraska (practically within the city limits), Fishler proudly maintained a “strictly Rag Apple” herd. His journey with registered Holsteins began in 1950, prompted by his children’s interest in FFA and 4-H work. That same year, he purchased Tabur Sovereign Man-O-War, a two-day-old bull calf and grandson of Montvic Rag Apple Sovereign, at the T.A. Burgeson Dispersal and brought him home in a pickup truck—a journey of some 400 miles.

Motivated by Man-O-War’s exceptional performance as a breeding bull—producing a show-winning get of sire that included Pawnee Farm Man-O-War Arlene (EX), a Nebraska state production champion—Fishler began making strategic trips to Canada. Crossing the border every two years in search of exceptional genetics, he eventually bought bulls from prominent Canadian breeders, including J.J.E. McCague, Fred Snyder, and Steve Roman.

The pivotal acquisition came in 1956 when Fishler secured Glenvue Clipper from Doug Dunton’s renowned Glenvue Farm in Ontario. Clipper, a massive white bull with good legs and a square rump, was sired by Rosafe Prefect, an Inka Supreme Reflection son. Though Clipper would later be sent to slaughter after his breeding career (weighing an astounding 2,880 pounds at the abattoir), his genetic contribution was already sealed through one remarkable daughter: Pawnee Farm Glenvue Beauty. Clipper’s daughters were known for their “beautiful rumps, tremendous size, respectable udders” but were low testers for butterfat content, which is why “none of the studs were interested in him.”

The April 14, 1962 Sale: A Turning Point in Dairy History

Pawnee Farm Glenvue Beauty (EX-90), photographed dry on the day of the sale, April 14, 1962, alongside breeder Lester Fishler, buyer Merlin Carlson (Arlinda Farms), and second-last bidder Cash Bottema. Very pregnant with Pawnee Farm Arlinda Chief, Beauty would soon give birth to the bull that revolutionized Holstein genetics.
Pawnee Farm Glenvue Beauty (EX-90), photographed dry on the day of the sale, April 14, 1962, alongside breeder Lester Fishler, buyer Merlin Carlson (Arlinda Farms), and second-last bidder Cash Bottema. Very pregnant with Pawnee Farm Arlinda Chief, Beauty would soon give birth to the bull that revolutionized Holstein genetics.

On April 14, 1962, near Central City, Nebraska, potential Holstein buyers from seven states gathered for the Pawnee Farm dispersal sale. This was no ordinary auction—it represented one of the most significant moments in Holstein breeding history, though few realized it then.

The sale average turned out to be the second highest that year, reflecting the exceptional quality of Fishler’s herd. Among the highlights:

  • Pawnee Farm Royal Master, a yearling bull by Carnation Royal Master, sold for $3,000 to John Blank from Kansas.
  • Pawnee Farm Man-O-War Arlene, an 8-year-old cow and dam of Royal Master, sold for $2,100.
  • Pawnee Farm Reflection Admiral, Beauty’s service sire and Chief’s eventual sire, had already earned acclaim as a “Gold Medal Sire” at AI Midwest Breeders in Wisconsin.

The sale star was Pawnee Farm Glenvue Beauty (EX-90), who was four years and seven months old at the time and very pregnant with Chief. Her photograph in the sale catalog had drawn significant attention from breeders nationwide.

California dairyman Wally Lindskoog was explicitly seeking a successor for his herd sire Ideal Burke Elsie Leader, who sired show type, dairyness and rump width, but not enough stature. Concerned that the trend toward a more dairy-type cow had resulted in breed frailty, Lindskoog sought a bull mother with front-end width combined with a broad, clean rump—characteristics he saw in Beauty’s photo.

Lindskoog dispatched his farm manager, Merlin Carlson, to Nebraska with instructions to purchase Beauty. After fierce bidding between Cash Bottema and Carlson, Beauty sold for $4,300—a substantial sum in 1962 that would be perhaps the most consequential investment in dairy genetics history.

Beauty then traveled by train to Turlock, California, a journey spanning 1,152 miles (2,483 km). On May 9, 1962, 25 days after her sale, she gave birth to Pawnee Farm Arlinda Chief.

Plushanski Chief Faith (4E-94 GMD), one of Pawnee Farm Arlinda Chief’s most famous and influential daughters, exemplified genetic excellence. Out of Ady Whirlhill Frona, a Kingpin dam, Faith became a cornerstone of modern Holstein breeding.
Plushanski Chief Faith (4E-94 GMD), one of Pawnee Farm Arlinda Chief’s most famous and influential daughters, exemplified genetic excellence. Out of Ady Whirlhill Frona, a Kingpin dam, Faith became a cornerstone of modern Holstein breeding.

The Birth of a Legend: Pawnee Farm Arlinda Chief

Chief’s pedigree reflected Fishler’s meticulous breeding strategy. His sire (Reflection Admiral) and dam (Glenvue Beauty) were second-generation descendants of Tabur Sovereign Man-O-War—the bull that laid the foundation for Fishler’s herd. Tragically, Fishler never lived to see Chief’s success; he passed away on September 30, 1964—just as Chief’s first calves were born.

The naming of Chief came through a fortuitous visit by Dave Risling, head of the Dairy Department at Modesto Junior College and a Native American active in national native affairs. When Risling visited Arlinda Farms with his class and asked what the calf would be named, Lindskoog replied, “We’ll name him after you, Chief.”

The young bull nearly didn’t survive to fulfill his destiny. At eight months of age, Chief battled a severe case of bloat that almost claimed his life. This dramatic moment—which could have dramatically altered dairy breeding history had it gone differently—was just the first chapter in Chief’s extraordinary story. Fortunately, he recovered and developed into a deep-bodied bull with substantial bone and what would later become his trademark characteristic—a ravenous appetite he would famously pass to his daughters.

The Recognition of Greatness: Expert Perspectives on Chief’s Extraordinary Impact

Chief’s genetic potential became evident almost immediately, leaving even experienced herdsmen astonished by his daughters’ capabilities. Lindskoog’s herdsman, Joe Silva, was so impressed by the production of Chief’s first four daughters that he declared to his employer: “We’ve got here one of the great milk bulls of all time.” This assessment proved remarkably prescient—within just two years, dairy industry computers had verified Silva’s prediction, with Chief achieving a Predicted Difference of plus 2,000 pounds of milk.

The artificial insemination industry quickly took notice. Morris Ewing, sire analyst with Curtiss Breeding Service, carefully tracked Chief’s results, while Doug Wilson at American Breeders’ Service immediately began using Chief and his daughters for contract matings.

After extended negotiations with Lindskoog, Curtiss Breeding Service manager Mel Kenley finally decided to acquire Chief. During their discussions, Kenley reviewed a summary of 24 tested Chief daughters that showed 23,028 milk and 816 fat with a Predicted Difference of +1845 milk and +70 fat. The daughters were also pleasing for type, showing a difference from expectancy of +2.25. Recognizing the historic opportunity, Kenley remarked, “Curtiss has made money every time we have dealt with Arlinda. I’m ready to sign.”

In 1968, Pawnee Farm Arlinda Chief joined the Curtiss battery on a lease arrangement. At his new home in Cary, Illinois, he shared top billing with Paclamar Astronaut. Chief’s September 1971 official summary, which included his first AI daughters, confirmed his exceptional status with figures of +1982 milk, +79 fat, and +0.61 Predicted Difference for type—solidifying his position as one of the top milk bulls in breed history.

Pete Blodgett, a sire analyst at Landmark Sires, identified Chief’s key strengths: “Pounds of milk, fat percentage, pounds of fat, width and depth (the correct combination of dairyness and strength) and feet and legs.” Blodgett further pointed out that Chief offered the ideal outcross for the Burke and Ormsby bloodlines that were dominant then.

Zehrview Arlinda Polly (EX-96 GMD), born June 12, 1969, was sired by Pawnee Farm Arlinda Chief and out of a modest pedigree featuring GP-81 Clanyard Admiral Jim Bey and Good-77 Gill-Ard Ru-Leta Master Jack. Despite her ordinary lineage, Polly became an extraordinary cow, showcasing the transformative power of Chief’s genetics. Five other Chief daughters from the Zehrview herd classified between 80 and 73 points.
Zehrview Arlinda Polly (EX-96 GMD), born June 12, 1969, was sired by Pawnee Farm Arlinda Chief and out of a modest pedigree featuring GP-81 Clanyard Admiral Jim Bey and Good-77 Gill-Ard Ru-Leta Master Jack. Despite her ordinary lineage, Polly became an extraordinary cow, showcasing the transformative power of Chief’s genetics. Five other Chief daughters from the Zehrview herd classified between 80 and 73 points.

The “Always Hungry” Daughters: A New Paradigm in Milk Production

Chief’s daughters were instantly recognizable in dairy herds: wide-fronted cows with deep ribs, correct feet and legs, and, most importantly, an extraordinary will to milk. Industry professionals noted that when evaluating a group of cows, the Chief daughters stood out immediately for their physical characteristics and remarkable production capabilities.

Beecher Arlinda Ellen exemplified the potential production the Chief passed to his offspring. At five years of age, she completed a record of 55,661 pounds of milk, making her the first cow in the breed to produce over 55,000 pounds in a year and the U.S. national champion. This achievement vividly illustrated the revolutionary genetic potential that Chief transmitted.

A charming anecdote illustrates the Chief daughters’ famous appetite for production: When Lindskoog brought a special flower-decorated blanket to place across Ellen’s shoulders during a celebration of her record at the Beecher family farm in Indiana, she immediately began eating the flowers, prompting an excited Lindskoog to proclaim, “The Chiefs are always hungry!”

Not everyone immediately recognized the value of Chief’s daughters. At the 1969 National Convention in California, one visitor called Arlinda Chief Linda “that big, white brute” and predicted she wouldn’t last long. Having reached 12 years and produced 211,000 pounds of milk, Linda proved that skeptic decisively wrong.

No bull passes, only perfection, however. Chief daughters sometimes lacked angularity as heifers (though this typically improved after calving), and their udders could be problematic—sometimes poorly shaped and weakly attached, with more swelling than average that persisted longer. Yet these shortcomings were typically overlooked because of their extraordinary milk production capabilities.

The Canadian Connection: Doug Dunton’s Genetic Legacy

Chief’s extraordinary genetic potential didn’t emerge from nowhere—it resulted from generations of thoughtful breeding, mainly through the Canadian connection established by Lester Fishler. Chief’s maternal grandfather, Glenvue Clipper, came from Doug Dunton’s renowned Glenvue Farm in Ontario, Canada.

Dunton was a legendary breeder, described by Dave Morrow of Holstein-Friesian World magazine as “Canada’s greatest breeder of brood cows”—though many considered him “the greatest breeder of transmitting dams in the history of the Holstein breed.” His breeding philosophy created the foundation upon which Chief’s genetic empire would be built.

The late Dave Morrow once wrote that all present-day Holsteins can be traced to a Glenvue animal, showing the extraordinary reach of Dunton’s breeding program. The Glenvue influence was first felt in the Holstein industry during the 1950s and ’60s with the advent of A.B.C. Reflection Sovereign and Spring Farm Fond Hope. This influence continued unabated through the partial Americanization of the Canadian breed when breed-changing sires like Pawnee Farm Arlinda Chief and Round Oak Rag Apple Elevation rose to prominence. Doug Dunton was among that elite group of breeders whose animals appear close up in the pedigrees of these influential bulls.

As the curtain was brought down in the twentieth century, the Glenvue blood was still prominent in the Holstein breed. Three North American cow families which in the 1990s were consistently producing bulls for AI service were all influenced by Chief’s lineage: the Dellias of Regancrest Farms in Iowa, the Martha family of Ricecrest in Pennsylvania, and the tribe of black and white cattle at Comestar Farm in Quebec that descended from Elysa Anthony Lea.

S-W-D Valiant (EX-95 GM), born June 28, 1973, was one of Pawnee Farm Arlinda Chief’s most influential sons. Out of Allied Admiral Rose Vivian VG-85 (by Irvington Pride Admiral), Valiant became a breed-changing sire known for transmitting show-ring type and production.
S-W-D Valiant (EX-95 GM), born June 28, 1973, was one of Pawnee Farm Arlinda Chief’s most influential sons. Out of Allied Admiral Rose Vivian VG-85 (by Irvington Pride Admiral), Valiant became a breed-changing sire known for transmitting show-ring type and production.

Building a Genetic Empire: The Sons That Changed Everything

Chief’s influence expanded exponentially through his exceptional sons, who became breed-changing sires. His most influential sons included Walkway Chief Mark (VG-GM), S-W-D Valiant (EX-GM), Glendell Arlinda Chief, and Milu Betty Ivanhoe Chief. Each transmitted different aspects of their sire’s genetic package: Walkway Chief Mark excelled in udders and production but left questionable legs; S-W-D Valiant could produce show-ring type but had weaknesses in udder conformation.

There was remarkable variation in how these sons transmitted Chief’s genetics. Glendell Arlinda Chief, the maternal grandsire of Emprise Bell Elton and Ronnybrook Prelude, was one of the most influential Chief sons. Glendell also sired Arlinda Rotate. Arlinda Chief Rose, Rotate’s dam, was likewise a Chief offspring. Rotate, an extreme milk transmitter who needed protection on udders, was the sire of Arlinda Melwood and, in turn, the sire of Maizefield Bellwood, whose son, Mara-Thon BW Marshall, completed one of the strongest paternal lines of production sires that the breed has known.

As one industry expert noted, “When it came to production, Chief’s impact was unparalleled.” His influence was transmitted through these high-impact sons, creating entire families of exceptional producers. The Milu bull, for example, sired Cal-Clark Board Chairman, who in turn sired To-Mar Blackstar—extending Chief’s influence through multiple generations.

The influence continued through successive generations, creating some of North America’s most influential cow families. The Dellia family at Regancrest Farms in Iowa (descended from a Walkway Chief Mark daughter) and the Martha family of Ricecrest in Pennsylvania (with the dam of Wa-Del RC Blackstar Martha being a Chief Mark daughter) became two of North America’s most influential cow families, regularly producing sons for AI service.

The 14% Solution: Managing Chief’s Unprecedented Genetic Concentration

According to the 2020 Holstein Pedigree Analysis, Chief’s genetic influence exceeded that of any other sire, except Elevation (15.28%). His bloodline, combined with that of Round Oak Rag Apple Elevation, pervaded the Holstein breed to an unprecedented degree. This level of genetic concentration—with Chief’s contribution estimated at 14.95% of the Holstein genome—raises essential questions about maintaining genetic diversity in the Holstein population.

This genetic dominance creates a challenging paradox for modern breeders: Chief’s genetics revolutionized milk production capabilities, adding billions of dollars in value to the dairy industry through increased efficiency. However, the concentration of his genes throughout the breed requires careful management to preserve genetic diversity.

Today, the typical Holstein cow produces more than twice the milk volume of cows from the 1960s, with Chief’s genetics playing a significant role in this transformation. However, as breeders and geneticists have come to recognize, maintaining genetic diversity is essential for long-term population health.

Modern breeding programs employ sophisticated genomic testing and more balanced selection approaches that focus on production and health, fertility, longevity, and genetic diversity. The goal is maintaining the production gains achieved through Chief’s genetics while ensuring sufficient genetic diversity for future generations.

Northcroft Ella Elevation (EX-97 4E GMD DOM), born February 26, 1974, exemplifies Holstein excellence. Sired by Round Oak Rag Apple Elevation and out of an EX-91 GMD DOM Pawnee Farm Arlinda Chief daughter, Ella represents the perfect blend of two legendary bloodlines that shaped modern dairy genetics.
Northcroft Ella Elevation (EX-97 4E GMD DOM), born February 26, 1974, exemplifies Holstein excellence. Sired by Round Oak Rag Apple Elevation and out of an EX-91 GMD DOM Pawnee Farm Arlinda Chief daughter, Ella represents the perfect blend of two legendary bloodlines that shaped modern dairy genetics.

BREED SHAPERS: The Dynamic Duo That Transformed Holstein Genetics

TraitPawnee Farm Arlinda ChiefRound Oak Rag Apple Elevation
Birth Year19621965
Genetic Contribution~14.95% of Holstein genome~15% of Holstein genome
Primary StrengthMilk productionType improvement
Key Transmitting TraitsDeep bodies, wide fronts, extraordinary milk volumeDairy strength, frame improvement, superior udders
Notable WeaknessUdder conformation issuesLess extreme production
Major Bloodline PathThrough sons Walkway Chief Mark & S-W-D ValiantThrough son Hanoverhill Starbuck
Maternal ConnectionBoth trace to Glenvue breeding and Nettie Jemima influence
Modern LegacyProduction potentialConformation excellence

While Chief revolutionized milk production capabilities with daughters known for their “will to milk,” Elevation improved type traits and conformation. Together, they created the foundation for the modern Holstein cow that could be produced at high levels while maintaining the physical structure to support that production.

Chiefs were known for wide front ends, deep ribs, and tremendous production, yet sometimes struggled with udder attachments. Elevation’s superior udder traits and overall conformation strength perfectly complemented Chief’s production power.

The combination of these bloodlines became the foundation for virtually every significant Holstein sire line of the late 20th century. Modern breeding programs continue to balance these traits, seeking the productivity Chief made possible with the structural soundness Elevation provided.

A Legacy That Challenges Today’s Breeders: Expert Insights

Pawnee Farm Arlinda Chief lived to the impressive age of 14, but his genetic contribution continues to shape the dairy industry decades after his passing. The combination of traits he passed to his offspring—especially their remarkable will to milk and the strength to sustain production at high levels—created a new paradigm for what was possible in dairy production.

Pete Blodgett’s analysis that Chief offered “the correct combination of dairyness and strength” highlights Chief’s balanced approach to breeding. While many bulls excelled in either production or conformation, Chief managed to advance both simultaneously, though not without some tradeoffs in udder conformation.

As the dairy industry faces evolving challenges in sustainability, efficiency, and animal welfare, the lessons from Chief’s legacy remain profoundly relevant. His story reminds us that genetic progress is powerful but must be managed with careful attention to long-term population health and genetic diversity.

The modern Holstein breeder faces a significant challenge: continuing to build on the production gains achieved through Chief’s genetics while ensuring sufficient genetic diversity for future generations. This balance requires thoughtful selection decisions that consider not just production traits but the overall genetic health of the population.

O’Katy, a stunning 3-year-old Stantons Chief daughter and descendant of the legendary Decrausaz Iron O’Kalibra, shines as Grand Champion at Schau der Besten 2025, proudly carrying on Chief’s enduring legacy in modern Holstein breeding.
O’Katy, a stunning 3-year-old Stantons Chief daughter and descendant of the legendary Decrausaz Iron O’Kalibra, shines as Grand Champion at Schau der Besten 2025, proudly carrying on Chief’s enduring legacy in modern Holstein breeding.

Actionable Takeaways for Today’s Breeders

  1. Balance Production with Diversity: While selecting for production traits that Chief made famous, intentionally incorporate genetic outcrosses to maintain diversity.
  2. Utilize Genomic Testing: Leverage modern genomic tools to identify the beneficial aspects of Chief’s genetics while avoiding excessive inbreeding.
  3. Consider Complete Genetic Merit: Look beyond production figures to evaluate animals’ health traits, longevity, and fertility—areas where some diversity beyond Chief’s genetics may be beneficial.
  4. Understand Your Herd’s Genetic Makeup: Know the percentage of Chief’s genetics in your herd and make mating decisions that complement rather than concentrate on these genetics.
  5. Learn from History: Study how Chief’s genetics transformed the breed to understand the benefits of strategic breeding and the risks of genetic concentration.
Maxima de Bois Seigneur, a striking daughter of Stantons Chief—a direct descendant of Pawnee Farm Arlinda Chief—showcases the enduring legacy of Chief’s genetics in modern Holstein breeding
Maxima de Bois Seigneur, a striking daughter of Stantons Chief—a direct descendant of Pawnee Farm Arlinda Chief—showcases the enduring legacy of Chief’s genetics in modern Holstein breeding.

The Lessons of the Chief Revolution: A Call to Action for Modern Breeders

Chief’s extraordinary story offers vital lessons for dairy breeders and industry professionals today. His legacy demonstrates the remarkable power of selective breeding to transform an entire breed and industry, but it also reminds us of the responsibility that comes with such power.

Chief’s story provides inspiration and caution for today’s Holstein breeders. The production gains his genetics made possible have transformed dairy farming economics. Still, the concentration of his genetics in the breed requires careful management to maintain genetic diversity for future generations.

The challenge for modern breeders is applying these lessons in their breeding programs: pursuing genetic improvement for economically essential traits while maintaining sufficient genetic diversity. By carefully balancing these objectives, breeders can build on Chief’s revolutionary legacy while ensuring the long-term health and sustainability of the Holstein breed.

Whether you’re breeding for production, type, or a balance of traits, understanding the full impact of Chief’s genetics provides valuable perspective on the potential and responsibility of selective breeding. As you make your next mating decisions, consider how your choices contribute to genetic progress and genetic diversity—the dual legacy of Pawnee Farm Arlinda Chief’s revolutionary impact on dairy cattle breeding.

NOE PENSYLVANI (Delta Lambda x G. Dreams), crowned Grand Champion at SPACE 2024, exemplifies excellence with bloodlines tracing back to the legendary Pawnee Farm Arlinda Chief through Delta Lambda’s rich genetic heritage.
NOE PENSYLVANI (Delta Lambda x G. Dreams), crowned Grand Champion at SPACE 2024, exemplifies excellence with bloodlines tracing back to the legendary Pawnee Farm Arlinda Chief through Delta Lambda’s rich genetic heritage.

What Genomics Could Have Changed: Chief’s Legacy in the Modern Era

His genetic story might have unfolded differently if Chief had been born in the genomic era rather than in 1962. Modern genomic testing—which allows breeders to identify specific genetic markers associated with desirable traits—could have amplified Chief’s extraordinary strengths while potentially mitigating his weaknesses.

According to recent research on genomic selection effectiveness, the reliability of genomic estimated breeding values (GEBVs) shows significant improvement over traditional methods, particularly for young bulls without progeny records—increasing accuracy by approximately 17% for milk yield traits compared to conventional evaluations. This might have meant Chief’s exceptional production potential would have been identified even earlier and with greater precision, potentially accelerating his influence on the Holstein breed.

More importantly, genomic testing might have flagged Chief’s udder conformation weaknesses before they became widespread. Search results reveal that “poor udder and teat conformation has been reported to reduce profitability in dairy herds” and “impacts the incidence of mastitis at calving and leads to decreased productivity.” Genomic tools could have allowed breeders to make more strategic mating decisions, pairing Chief with cows specifically selected to complement his udder conformation weaknesses while maximizing his production strengths.

Perhaps most significantly, could genomic tools have prevented the challenges associated with extreme genetic concentration? With Chief’s genetics ultimately contributing nearly 15% to the Holstein genome, a level of dominance unprecedented in livestock breeding, modern genomic approaches might have identified other complementary bloodlines earlier. This could have enabled a more balanced distribution of genetic influence while still capturing Chief’s revolutionary production capabilities.

Recent dairy research has discussed integrating genomic and phenotypic evaluation, which shows “great promise in enhancing the accuracy of predicting udder-related traits and improving dairy cattle selection.” For a bull of Chief’s caliber, this combined approach might have resulted in a more targeted deployment of his genetics, balancing immediate production gains with long-term genetic diversity.

Would Chief still have become the most influential Holstein sire in history if today’s genomic tools had been available? The answer is likely yes—but his influence might have been more strategically directed, potentially avoiding genetic concentration challenges while still revolutionizing milk production capabilities worldwide.

Raypien Lambda Adou, 1st place Summer Two-Year-Old at the International Holstein Show 2024, showcases elite genetics. Sired by Lambda, a descendant of Pawnee Farm Arlinda Chief through multiple influential bloodlines, Adou represents the enduring legacy of Chief’s impact on modern Holstein breeding.
Raypien Lambda Adou, 1st place Summer Two-Year-Old at the International Holstein Show 2024, showcases elite genetics. Sired by Lambda, a descendant of Pawnee Farm Arlinda Chief through multiple influential bloodlines, Adou represents the enduring legacy of Chief’s impact on modern Holstein breeding.

A Revolutionary Legacy That Continues Today

Pawnee Farm Arlinda Chief lived to age 14 but left an indelible mark on dairy farming worldwide. His daughters’ will to milk, paired with their strength, created a new standard for Holstein productivity—and his sons carried this legacy forward across generations.

As breeders face evolving challenges like sustainability and genetic diversity today, Chief’s story remains deeply relevant—a reminder that while genetic progress is powerful, it must be managed responsibly for long-term success.

His name is one of history’s most influential sires—a legend whose impact still shapes every Holstein cow alive today. The question for today’s breeders isn’t whether to use Chief’s genetics—they’re already present in virtually every Holstein—but how to balance their benefits with the maintenance of genetic diversity needed for future generations.

KEY TAKEAWAYS:

  • Chief’s genetics revolutionized milk production, doubling average yields and adding billions in value to the dairy industry.
  • His 14.95% contribution to the Holstein genome highlights breeding success and genetic diversity concerns.
  • Modern genomic tools offer ways to amplify the strengths and mitigate the weaknesses of influential sires like Chief.
  • Balancing production gains with genetic diversity remains a crucial challenge for today’s breeders.
  • Chief’s story underscores the long-term impact of breeding decisions and the need for strategic genetic management.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Pawnee Farm Arlinda Chief, born in 1962, became the most influential Holstein sire in history, contributing nearly 15% to the breed’s current genome. His extraordinary milk production traits passed down through over 16,000 daughters and countless descendants, fundamentally altered dairy economics worldwide. Chief’s legacy demonstrates both the power of selective breeding and the risks of genetic concentration. His story, from a fortuitous sale in Nebraska to global impact, offers vital lessons for modern breeders on balancing genetic progress with diversity. Today, as genomic tools reshape breeding strategies, Chief’s influence continues to challenge and inspire the dairy industry.

LEARN MORE

Join the Revolution!

Join over 30,000 successful dairy professionals who rely on Bullvine Daily for their competitive edge. Delivered directly to your inbox each week, our exclusive industry insights help you make smarter decisions while saving precious hours every week. Never miss critical updates on milk production trends, breakthrough technologies, and profit-boosting strategies that top producers are already implementing. Subscribe now to transform your dairy operation’s efficiency and profitability—your future success is just one click away.

NewsSubscribe
First
Last
Consent

CAPTAIN: The Bull That Rewrote the Rules for Modern Breeding

Genosource CAPTAIN: The bull that broke the breeding game. 7 consecutive #1 TPI rankings. 7,934 daughters in 494 herds worldwide. A2A2 milk commanding premiums. This is not merely about genetics; it signifies a revolution. While skeptics stuck to traditional beliefs, CAPTAIN’s 99% reliability score shattered conventional wisdom. Buckle up for the billion-dollar genomic checkmate.

Genosource CAPTAIN isn’t just an ordinary bull – he embodies a genetic revolution. Seven consecutive #1 TPI rankings. Now, with over 7,934 daughters across 494 herds worldwide. A2A2 milk that can command premiums. These numbers are now more than statistics; they are concrete proof of genomics evolving from an industry buzzword to an unstoppable force. While skeptics clung to outdated “wait-and-see” breeding strategies, CAPTAIN’s 99% reliability score for milk production becomes the sledgehammer shattering conventional wisdom.   Let’s explore how STgenetics® strategically used genomics to achieve significant success.

The Architects Meet Their Masterpiece: Genosource team with CAPTAIN

The Genomic Masterstroke 

“We didn’t breed CAPTAIN – we built him,” says STgenetics® CEO Juan Moreno. This success was not by chance but by careful genetic planning that predicted outcomes.

CAPTAIN’s story begins not in a barn but in a lab. STgenetics® didn’t stumble into this – they engineered it through a decade of calculated genetic strategy:

CAPTAIN wasn’t born – he was designed. STgenetics® played 4D chess while others stuck to genetic checkers:

When STgenetics® CEO Juan Moreno reveals this surprising fact, he is not boasting—he is exposing the harsh reality of developing modern dairy genetics. This isn’t a simple story about a fortunate breeding event. Advanced genetic engineering is reshaping the standards for global seed stock breeding. Let’s explain why this quote should terrify anyone still “playing by the old rules.”

The Charl Coup  (Captains Sire)

STgenetics® executed “The Charl Coup” by acquiring Hurtgenlea Richard Charl, a son of DG Charley. DG Charley, sired by Cogent Supershot and out of DG Candide VG-85-NL (a Mogul daughter), was a European standout many North American programs initially underestimated. Despite his impressive European performance, there was skepticism about how his genetics would translate to North American breeding programs. STgenetics® recognized the potential in Hurtgenlea Richard Charl, a Charley son from Hurtgenlea Yoder Modesto-ET VG-86, tracing back to Hurtgenlea Dante Marissa EX-93 2E GMD DOM. While competitors focused on popular North American sires, STgenetics® saw untapped genetic value in this European lineage.

By combining Charl’s exceptional fertility and durability genes with robust maternal traits, Genosource created CAPTAIN, a genetic powerhouse that challenged traditional breeding norms. Through advanced Chromosomal Mating® techniques, STgenetics® navigated potential genetic pitfalls while amplifying economically important traits like A2A2 milk production and feed efficiency. This strategic approach demonstrated that genetic expertise can be more valuable than a conventional focus on cow appearances. The result was CAPTAIN’s historic dominance in the industry, effectively rewriting the breeding playbook and leaving competitors struggling to catch up in the genomic era.

The Sabre Gambit (Captain’s Maternal Grand Sire) 

Captain’s dam GENOSOURCE SABRE 35223

STgenetics® revolutionized cattle breeding by acquiring Sabre, an unranked bull with exceptional potential revealed through advanced genomic analysis. This bold move challenged industry norms, as competitors dismissed Sabre as high-risk while STgenetics® recognized hidden value. Their success stemmed from using Dymentholm Sunview Skye VG-85 (Sudan x Planet Silk) as Sabre’s dam, combining Sudan’s maternal strength with the Planet Silk Family’s production legacy. Sabre’s sire, Tango, contributed overlooked traits that enhanced functional superiority in offspring. The program’s foundation, Seagull-Bay Oman Mirror VG-86, was crucial in shaping Sabre’s genetic lineage. This genetic sequence (Mirror +Skye =Sabre) showcases STgenetics’ expertise in merging advantageous traits over multiple generations, creating a robust genetic combination that conventional pedigree analysis might overlook. The result was Sabre’s impressive $478 NM$ rating, validating STgenetics’ innovative approach of merging deep pedigree analysis with cutting-edge genomic screening.

As breeder Tim Rauen warns: “This isn’t about semen – it’s survival. Miss CAPTAIN and you’re volunteering for obsolescence.”  (Read more: From Pasture to Powerhouse: The GenoSource Story)

IVF & Cloning Captain: The Genetic Blitzkrieg

STgenetics® flooded global herds with CAPTAIN’s elite genetics at breakneck speed, leaving competitors in the dust. Their cutting-edge IVF program, powered by the proprietary Donor Output Index, churned out 18+ viable embryos per cycle from top cows. Leveraging Ultraplus™ sex-sorted semen and Chromosomal Mating®, they amplified CAPTAIN’s best traits while dodging genetic pitfalls.

STgenetics® and Genosource didn’t just breed a champion in Genosource Captain; they engineered a genetic revolution. To capitalize on Captain’s unprecedented success, they created Genosource Jack-ETN and Genosource John-ETN, full genomic clones sharing his industry-leading +3336 GTPI. This bold move wasn’t just about replication – it was about domination.  Jack and John aren’t just copies; they’re genetic accelerants that cemented Captain’s legacy while proving that in modern dairy economics, speed of genetic dissemination is king.

This transformed CAPTAIN from a genomic prospect to a proven global kingpin in the blink of an eye. With 321 daughters on the ground worldwide in a swift move, STgenetics® didn’t just enter the market – they owned it. Record-shattering PLI and MACE-LPI scores followed, cementing a significant market share and rewriting the rules of precision cattle breeding. At the same time, the competition still fumbled with outdated playbooks.

Captain’s Daughters: Genetic Jackpots in the Milking Parlor 

MetricCaptain’s DaughtersAverage Holstein SireImprovement
Milk Yield (305d)32,542 lbs25,876 lbs+25.8%
Feed Efficiency+277 lbs saved+150 lbs saved+84.7%
Productive Life+5.3 months36.1 months baseline+14.7%
Somatic Cell Score3.03.4+11.7%
Net Merit $ $1395$908+53.6%

Captain’s genetic prowess is vividly displayed through his daughters’ outstanding performance across multiple herds worldwide. Their breeding patterns consistently demonstrate superior traits that are reshaping industry standards:

  • Production Powerhouses
    • Average Milk Yield: 32,542 lbs
    • Fat Production: +156 lbs (+0.21%)
    • Protein Yield: +91 lbs (+0.04%)
  • Efficiency Champions
    • EcoFeed® Rating: +103 (cow), +99 (heifer) – top 2% of the breed
    • Feed Saved: 277 lbs/lactation
  • Health and Longevity
    • Digital Dermatitis: 0.7% lower incidence
    • Productive Life: +5.3 months
  • Fertility Marvels
    • Daughter Pregnancy Rate: +1.8% above average
Genosource Bravo 47586-ET VG-86

Daughter: Genosource Bravo 47586-ET VG-86

 Outstanding Individual Performers

  1. GENOSOURCE DIOR 78951-ET + 3314 TPI and +1361 NM$
  2. GENOSOURCE BRAVO 47586-ET VG-86 +3204 and  +1258 NM$
  3. OCD CAPTAIN RAE 63785 VG-85 +3244 TPI and  +1252 NM$ dam of Ripcord (+3399 GTPI)

Captain’s daughters are not just improving herds but revolutionizing them. These cows set new benchmarks for modern dairy farming with their high production, exceptional health, and remarkable efficiency. From small family farms to large commercial operations, Captain’s genetic influence is evident in the consistent, high-performing daughters transforming the industry one lactation at a time. 

CAPTAIN’s Sons: Genetic Titans Crushing the Competition 

CAPTAIN isn’t just a bull; he’s a genetic wrecking ball whose sons are demolishing industry records and leaving competitors in the dust. 

Domination Station 

  • 40% of top 50 gNM$ bulls are now his sons or out of Captain’s daughters
  • Genosource Jingle +3308 TPI and +1350 NM$
  • Genosource Broach +3294 TPI and +1327 NM$
  • FLEURY CAPTAIN EMJY  +3293 and  +1225 NM$

This isn’t a one-bull wonder – it’s a genetic tsunami reshaping the breed’s future. 

OCD Captain Rae 63785-ET: The genetic powerhouse behind RIPCORD. This exceptional Captain daughter isn’t just continuing her sire’s legacy – she’s amplifying it. As the dam of the high-ranking TPI sire RIPCORD (+3399 GTPI), Rae embodies the multi-generational impact of CAPTAIN’s genetics.

Rewriting the AI Playbook: CAPTAIN’s Industry-Wide Tsunami

STgenetics® flooded the market with 4,153 CAPTAIN daughters while the competition still read “Breeding for Dummies.” Now, his sons are driving 70% of ST genomic young bull sales. It’s not just a market share; it’s market domination.

CAPTAIN’s impact on the artificial insemination (AI) industry has been revolutionary, fundamentally altering how genetics are disseminated and valued. STgenetics® deployed 4,153 CAPTAIN daughters in just 24 months, 4.6 times faster than industry averages, forcing competitors to overhaul their breeding programs or risk obsolescence. This speed and the success of cloning CAPTAIN (JACK-ETN and JOHN-ETN) proved the viability of replicating elite genetics at scale. As a result, CAPTAIN and his progeny now drive a significant portion of genomic young bull sales, shifting the industry away from traditional proven sire models and reshaping the entire genetic marketplace. 

The success of CAPTAIN catalyzed the widespread adoption of in vitro fertilization (IVF) in breeding programs, making it standard practice for rapidly multiplying elite genetics and slashing generation intervals by 57%. This genomic revolution has redefined economic models in dairy genetics, with AI companies now focusing on comprehensive genetic packages that promise feed efficiency and health traits alongside production. The exceptional performance of CAPTAIN’s offspring has set new benchmarks for what’s possible in modern dairy farming. 

CAPTAIN’s worldwide success (#1 in TPI, PLI, and LPI) has accelerated international genetic trade, compelling AI companies to think globally from the outset of their breeding programs. This transformation has turned the AI industry from a steady, traditional business into a high-speed, technology-driven sector. Companies are now racing to identify and propagate the next genomic superstars, knowing that in this new landscape, market leadership can be gained or lost at the speed of genetic replication. The genetic wave unleashed by CAPTAIN has transformed the industry and established a new standard where speed, precision, and global influence determine success.

CAPTAIN’s Lessons: How to Breed a Revolution 

CAPTAIN didn’t just change the game; he nuked it from orbit. Here’s what the industry needs to learn or get left in the genomic dust: 

  1. Genomics: Not Hype, It’s Your Lifeline: CAPTAIN’s adjusted genomic proof was 3214 TPI and he now stands at +3336 with daughter data added. Genomics called it. Are you still “waiting to see”? Enjoy bankruptcy.
  2. Extreme Is the New Normal: +2,542 lbs milk and better fertility? CAPTAIN doesn’t balance traits; he dominates them. Stop breeding for “good enough.” Aim for “holy cow!”
  3. Go Global or Go Home: CAPTAIN topped TPI, PLI, and LPI worldwide. If your bull only ranks stateside? Congrats on your local participation trophy.
  4. Speed Kills… Your Competition: STgenetics flooded markets with 4,153 CAPTAIN daughters while others were still reading pedigrees. In genomics, the quick eat the slow.
  5. Sacred Cows Make the Best Burgers: High production with better fertility? A2A2 without volume loss? CAPTAIN did it. What “impossible” are you too scared to try?
  6. Data Is Nice, Insight Is Priceless: Everyone has numbers. CAPTAIN’s team saw gold, whereas others saw gambles. Invest in individuals who can extract groundbreaking insights from data analysis. 

The Captain didn’t raise the bar; he strapped it to a rocket. The choice for AI companies and breeders is clear: innovate like the Captain or become the dairy industry‘s flip phone.  

The Bottom Line

CAPTAIN didn’t just validate genomics – he exposed the brutal math of modern dairying. This isn’t about keeping up whether your herd will lead the revolution or become its cautionary tale. 

In the end, Bullvine’s verdict is clear: Genomics emerged triumphant, leaving tradition in its wake. Now it’s your turn to make a decisive leap into the future. 

Key Takeaways

  • Genomic selection is no longer optional – essential for survival in modern dairy breeding.
  • Speed to market is crucial. Leverage advanced reproductive technologies like IVF to disseminate elite genetics rapidly.
  • Look beyond traditional metrics. The hidden genetic potential may lie in overlooked bloodlines or traits.
  • Global impact is the new standard. Breed for traits that translate across borders and indexes.
  • Challenge breeding dogmas. High production can coexist with fertility, and A2A2 doesn’t mean sacrificing volume.
  • Invest heavily in data analytics. The ability to interpret genomic data is as valuable as the data itself.
  • Focus on extreme trait combinations that redefine industry standards, not just incremental improvements.
  • Prioritize feed efficiency and health traits alongside production for maximum economic impact.
  • Embrace new technologies like sexed semen and embryo transfer to accelerate genetic progress.
  • Continuously educate yourself and your clients on genomic advancements to stay ahead.

Summary

The dairy breeding landscape has been irrevocably altered due to CAPTAIN’s genomic tsunami. This isn’t just about one exceptional bull; it’s a stark warning to an entire industry. Those clinging to outdated breeding philosophies aren’t just falling behind – they’re actively choosing obsolescence. CAPTAIN’s legacy, from his record-shattering daughters to his market-dominating sons, proves that genomic selection isn’t just a tool; it’s the new battlefield where genetic wars are won or lost. The message is crystal clear for breeders and AI companies: adapt to the era of genomic dominance or risk being left behind.  The future of dairy isn’t just bright; it’s dazzlingly efficient, incredibly productive, and undeniably shaped by genomics. In this new era, CAPTAIN isn’t just a success story – he’s the epitome of survival and success.

Join the Revolution!

Bullvine Daily is your essential e-zine for staying ahead in the dairy industry. With over 30,000 subscribers, we bring you the week’s top news, helping you manage tasks efficiently. Stay informed about milk production, tech adoption, and more, so you can concentrate on your dairy operations. 

NewsSubscribe
First
Last
Consent

CDCB Unveils Net Merit 2025: Updating Dairy Genetic Selection

Net Merit 2025 is set to revolutionize dairy breeding. Launching April 1, 2025, this updated index emphasizes butterfat, feed efficiency, and cow longevity. Discover how these changes could boost your herd’s profitability and shape the future of dairy farming. Are you ready for the next generation of genetics?

Summary:

The Council on Dairy Cattle Breeding (CDCB) is set to launch Net Merit 2025 on April 1, 2025, introducing significant updates to the genetic selection index for dairy farmers. This revision adjusts trait emphases to reflect current market trends and production realities, with notable changes including increased butterfat production, a greater focus on feed efficiency, and more weight on cow and heifer livability. The update aims to improve cow profitability over generations by combining economic values for 12 individual traits and five composite subindexes into a single value. While the changes are substantial, the high correlation between the 2025 and 2021 indexes suggests stability in genetic evaluations. Dairy farmers are encouraged to consider these updates in their long-term breeding strategies, considering that the index may not perfectly reflect individual farm conditions. Additional specialized indices are available for specific production systems, offering farmers flexibility in aligning genetic selection with their particular market and operational needs.

Key Takeaways:

  • The Council on Dairy Cattle Breeding (CDCB) will release Net Merit 2025 to enhance dairy genetic selection based on current market trends.
  • The updated index emphasizes butterfat production and livability while de-emphasizing protein to align with economic changes.
  • Specialized indices, such as Cheese Merit, Fluid Merit, and Grazing Merit, help tailor genetic selection to various production systems.
  • Net Merit provides a long-term strategy for improving dairy cow profitability, emphasizing trends of economically vital traits.
  • Farmers are encouraged to stay informed through USDA resources and industry workshops to incorporate Net Merit into breeding decisions optimally.
Net Merit 2025, dairy breeding, genetic selection index, cow profitability, dairy farming trends

The Council on Dairy Cattle Breeding (CDCB) will introduce Net Merit 2025, which includes updated genetic selection methods for dairy farmers, on April 1, 2025. This update revises genetic selection for dairy farmers nationwide and adjusts trait emphasis to reflect current market trends and production realities. 

What is Net Merit? 

The Lifetime Net Merit (NM$) index ranks dairy animals based on their combined genetic merit for economically important traits. Net Merit 2025 introduces innovative methods for evaluating traits and economic factors in dairy animals. 

Dr. Paul VanRaden, a Research Geneticist at USDA, highlights Net Merit 2025 as a strategic response to the evolving dairy industry. The update integrates recent economic data and research to assist farmers in breeding more profitable cows.

NM$ combines values of particular traits and subindexes to improve the profitability of cows over multiple generations. 

The Evolution of Net Merit 

First published in 1994 by the USDA’s Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, Net Merit has been routinely updated at three—to four-year intervals. The index weights are based on an economic model that considers incomes and expenses over a dairy cow’s lifetime, using data from public sources when possible. 

Net Merit 2025 is the result of extensive collaboration. The process included: 

  • Initial drafting by USDA’s Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory (AGIL) in the summer of 2024
  • Public discussion at the CDCB Industry Meeting during World Dairy Expo
  • Presentation to university experts at the S-1096 Multistate Research Project meeting
  • Review by CDCB’s Genetic Evaluation Methods and Producer Advisory Committees
  • Final approval by the CDCB Board of Directors in December 2024

Key Changes in Net Merit 2025 

Comparison of Trait Weights

The following table shows the expected relative value of economically rooted weights of traits in the revised April 2025 Net Merit $ formula, compared to weights in the current formula:

TraitCurrent NM$April 2025 NM$
Protein19.6%13.0%
Fat28.6%31.8%
Feed Saved12.0%17.8%
Productive Life11.0%8.0%
Cow Livability7.0%8.0%
Udder Composite7.0%7.0%
Fertility6.8%6.8%
Heifer Livability1.3%2.0%

The 2025 revision includes significant changes: 

  • Butterfat Emphasis: The emphasis on butterfat production has increased, aligning with recent price trends. The weight of fat in NM$ has risen from 28.6 to 31.8.
  • Protein De-emphasis: The weight for protein decreased from 19.6 to 13.
  • Livability Focus: Greater emphasis on cow and heifer livability, reflecting higher cull cow and heifer calf prices.
  • Feed Efficiency: More negative emphasis on Body Weight Composite and greater focus on Residual Feed Intake to address feed costs.
  • Minimal Reranking: The 2025 and 2021 NM$ indexes show a high correlation of 0.992 for young Holstein bulls and 0.981 for recent progeny-tested bulls, indicating stability in genetic evaluations.

Customized Selection Indices 

In addition to NM$, CDCB offers three more indices customized for specific dairy operations: Cheese Merit (CM$), Fluid Merit (FM$), and Grazing Merit (GM$). 

  • Cheese Merit (CM$): Tailored for cheese producers, this index emphasizes protein and somatic cell score.
  • Fluid Merit (FM$): Designed for fluid milk producers, focusing on milk volume and butterfat.
  • Grazing Merit (GM$): Optimized for pasture-based systems, prioritizing fertility and adaptability.

These specialized indices allow farmers to align genetic selection with their specific market and production system. 

Applying Net Merit to Your Farm 

While Net Merit is a valuable tool, it may not comprehensively capture each farm’s conditions. Therefore, it is recommended that farmers prioritize evaluating the genetic progress trends for traits most vital to their operations. 

“Rather than focus on one number or another, it’s more helpful to look at the big picture,” suggests VanRaden. “USDA provides the expected genetic progress in each trait from selection on NM$, and it’s better to see if the trends for the traits most important to you are in the desired direction.” 

Long-Term Strategy for Herd Improvement 

Farmers should adopt a long-term perspective when considering Net Merit 2025 to achieve sustainable improvements in their herds. The index has been designed to improve cow profitability over the generations, requiring patience and consistent application. 

Staying Informed 

For the latest information on Net Merit and its applications: 

  1. Review USDA AGIL’s technical document detailing Net Merit calculations.
  2. Watch Paul VanRaden’s PowerPoint presentation, which summarizes changes and provides examples of how genetic values affect a cow’s lifetime profit.
  3. Engage with industry workshops and webinars to stay updated on genetic selection strategies.

Conclusion: Embracing the Future of Dairy Genetics 

Net Merit 2025 signifies the dairy industry’s dedication to advancement, efficiency, and sustainability beyond an index update. Embracing these tools and staying informed about industry developments can empower dairy farmers to succeed in a constantly evolving market. 

Looking ahead, farmers should actively engage with and adapt to these modifications. How do you plan to incorporate Net Merit 2025 into your breeding decisions? Share your thoughts and join the conversation shaping the future of dairy farming

Learn more:

Can Gene Editing Transform Dairy Farming Forever?

Could gene editing transform dairy breeding? Will it replace or improve traditional ways? See what’s next for dairy farming.

Could gene editing mean the end of traditional dairy breeding? In a world where technology changes fast, how we’ve always bred dairy cows might soon be outdated. With new tools like CRISPR, gene editing is shaking up the farming world, suggesting a significant change that could forever alter how we produce dairy. These advances could achieve what used to take decades with traditional breeding, making us question the future of old methods. We are beginning a new era, and it’s time to look closely at how these changes could benefit the industry.

Unpacking the Genetic Revolution: The CRISPR-Cas9 Phenomenon 

Gene editing is a significant scientific advancement, allowing for precise gene changes. Tools like CRISPR-Cas9 make this possible. But what makes it so unique, and why is it a significant breakthrough? 

How CRISPR-Cas9 Works 

CRISPR-Cas9 works like tiny, precise scissors. Scientists use it to target specific genes and cut them accurately. It has two main parts: the CRISPR part, which is like a map guiding where to cut, and the Cas9 enzyme that does the cutting. 

  • Scientists create a CRISPR guide matching the gene they want to change.
  • This guide leads Cas9 to the exact spot in the DNA.
  • Cas9 then cuts the DNA at that spot.
  • The cell naturally repairs the DNA, allowing for changes like adding or removing genes.

This precise method ensures that only the right spot is changed, reducing the risk of mistakes. CRISPR-Cas9 is also faster and cheaper than older methods, which makes it stand out. 

Gene Editing vs. Adding Foreign DNA 

Unlike methods that add genes from one species to another, gene editing mainly changes genes already in the animal. Adding foreign genes can create new traits and face significant ethical and environmental issues. 

Gene editing focuses on tweaking genes in the same species. This method can boost positive traits or remove bad ones without mixing genes from different species. This makes gene editing more accepted by laws and the public, avoiding many issues faced by adding foreign DNA. 

Why It Matters 

Gene editing changes the game for several reasons: 

  • Accuracy: Can target the exact genes for change, unlike random changes in breeding or adding foreign DNA.
  • Speed: Changes that took years through breeding can now happen quickly.
  • Cost: It’s cheaper and saves time compared to older ways.
  • Ethics: Fewer concerns about mixing species helps solve ethical issues.

Overall, gene editing with CRISPR-Cas9 opens new, exciting possibilities in dairy breeding and other fields, balancing scientific goals and public opinions.

The Age-Old Method: Is Traditional Breeding Running Out of Steam?

Traditional dairy breeding has been the primary way farmers improve their cattle. It involves picking the best animals over generations to get better traits, like milk production, fertility, and staying healthy. Farmers look at family history and visible traits to choose which animals to breed together. The animals with the best scores are used to form the next generation

Traditional breeding is a very slow process. Trait improvements, like milk yield, happen gradually in each generation. Adding one good trait to the herd can take 15 to 20 years. This happens because it depends on how genes mix naturally, which makes predicting results hard. 

The main problem with traditional breeding is that it depends on natural gene changes and takes a long time because cows have long lifespans. It’s slow, and the data about cow traits isn’t sometimes precise. Also, traditional breeding can accidentally reduce the variety of genes, using a limited number of animals to obtain certain traits. This could lead to inbreeding, causing unwanted traits or making the herd less adaptable. 

Even with these challenges, traditional breeding has helped improve dairy cattle genetics. It shows the value of patience and careful planning in farming. But now, with new technology like gene editing, farmers might find faster, more focused ways to improve cattle without the downsides of traditional breeding. 

Beyond the Horizon: Unleashing the Precision and Power of Gene Editing in Dairy Cattle

Gene editing is very promising for dairy cows because it’s precise and fast. Using tools like CRISPR-Cas9, scientists can accurately change a cow’s genes. This helps improve good traits in cows without adding foreign genes, which reduces the risk of problems. 

Gene editing works much faster than old breeding methods, which can take many generations to see changes. This fast work can quickly improve dairy cow genetics. 

Gene editing can improve important traits like milk production, helping farms become more efficient and profitable. It can also make cows more resistant to diseases, saving money and keeping them healthier. 

Additionally, gene editing could help eliminate painful practices like dehorning by changing the genes responsible for these traits. This would lead to more humane and sustainable farming. 

In short, gene editing in dairy cows means making precise and fast changes for better milk production, disease resistance, and animal welfare. It complements old breeding but does it much more effectively.

The Future is Now: Accelerating Dairy Breeding with Gene Editing

Gene editing offers many advantages over traditional breeding, especially with tools like CRISPR-Cas9. It lets us make changes at specific spots in the DNA so we can add the traits we want without random chance. This means we can make genetic improvements much faster. What used to take decades with traditional breeding can now be done with gene editing in just a few years. 

Gene editing isn’t just about choosing specific traits. It can also fix complicated traits that involve multiple genes, like disease resistance and adapting to the environment. For instance, scientists have used gene editing to help protect animals from diseases like Bovine Viral Diarrhea Virus (BVDV), which shows how it can improve animal health and productivity. However, there’s a worry about making mistakes in other parts of the DNA, so research is needed to be more precise and reduce the risks. 

Looking deeper into these advancements, we see that traditional methods have limits. Take OCD Thorson Ripcord-ET, the current #1 NMS in the world at 1485. Compare this to a “Supercow,” which could have an NM$ of $6745 using the best genetics in Holsteins. The genetic gain of traditional breeding is about $94 NM annually. It would take about 55 years to reach the level of a “Supercow.” This shows the power of gene editing, which can skip over the limits of natural breeding. However, challenges like changes in efficiency remain, meaning we need to keep improving gene editing technologies to make them reliable and effective in changing the future of dairy cattle genetics.

Gene Editing: A Brave New World or a Pandora’s Box? 

The argument about using gene editing in farm animals raises many ethical worries, especially about animal welfare. Gene editing aims to make animals healthier by giving them traits that fight diseases or avoid painful things like dehorning. But there’s still a question about what might happen in the long run. Could these genetic changes accidentally create new health issues that harm the animals’ quality of life? 

Aside from welfare, there’s the issue of animal dignity. Ethical arguments ask if it’s right to change the genetic makeup of living beings for human gain. Is there a big difference between selective breeding, which is very old, and cutting genes to fit a plan? Do these actions harm the natural dignity of animals by turning them into tools for production? 

The possible environmental effects are also a concern. If genetically edited animals somehow join nature, it might surprisingly change ecosystems. Changes in one species could affect the whole food chain, impacting biodiversity and natural habitats. It’s crucial to balance promoting farming improvements with environmental protection and ethical standards.

Regulatory Labyrinth: Navigating Global Standards for Gene-Edited Animals 

The rules for gene-edited animals vary worldwide, like a patchwork quilt of different pieces. Each country or region has its way of evaluating this technology based on its culture and beliefs. These differences can affect how quickly these technologies are adopted and change how they are used in global markets

  • United States: The United States is generally open to gene editing, with the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) leading the way. The FDA treats gene-edited animals like regular farm animals as long as the edits can happen naturally or through regular breeding. However, the FDA still requires careful checks to ensure they are safe for animals and people. This approach encourages new ideas but raises questions about managing them in the long run. 
  • European Union: The European Union (EU) has stricter rules, treating gene-edited organisms like GMOs (genetically modified organisms). These rules require detailed labeling and safety tests. This can make introducing gene-edited animals in their markets hard and might slow progress and competition. The EU wants to stay cautious about new genetic technology while ensuring public confidence. 
  • Japan: Japan’s rules are more flexible, and each case is examined individually. If a gene-edited animal doesn’t have DNA from other species, it might not be considered a GMO. This approach could avoid some strict regulations, making it easier to approve. However, it must carefully maintain consistent rules and consumer trust. 

All these rules aim to ensure the safety of gene-edited animals without stopping innovation. However, challenges like off-target effects, where unintended changes occur, add complexity to safety checks. Bringing more uniformity to these rules globally is essential. It can help with transparency, market access, and broader acceptance of these new technologies

While these different approaches show varying ideas, they all focus on a shared goal: protecting public and environmental health while keeping pace with advancements in animal genetics. The conversation continues as experts and policymakers work together to find a balance in this new era.

Cautious Optimism: Charting the Future of Dairy Breeding with Gene Editing

The dairy industry hopes gene editing will change the game. The industry sees many benefits, such as higher productivity, better animal welfare, and more sustainable farming. Gene editing allows us to add specific traits quickly, speeding up breeding progress that usually takes decades. 

But, costs are a significant consideration. Starting with gene editing can be expensive. However, these costs should go down as more people use these technologies. Compared to traditional breeding, which can be slow and pricey, gene editing might be cheaper to improve genetics in the long run. 

The key issue is whether people accept gene-edited products. Some consumers hesitate, but explaining and educating the public can help change their opinions. The dairy industry needs to talk to consumers and show how safe and beneficial these advancements are in building trust. 

Gene editing will likely add to, not replace, traditional breeding methods. Gene editing is precise and efficient, but traditional methods still have a place, especially where gene editing faces limits or regulations. Together, these two methods could work well, using each of their strengths to improve the genetic quality of dairy cattle. 

Pioneers of Progress: Gene Editing’s Tangible Impact on Dairy Cattle

The reality of gene editing in dairy cattle is not just science fiction. It’s a growing field that is making real progress. A good example is the work of Recombinetics, a biotech company that is doing extraordinary things. Working with the University of Minnesota, they’ve achieved big wins in breeding polled cattle. Using gene editing to remove the horned trait, they aim to improve animal welfare by eliminating the painful process of dehorning, a significant concern for dairy farmers

Similarly, Acceligen, another Recombinetics branch, shows how gene editing can work. Acceligen edits cattle genes to give traits like heat tolerance, which helps them deal with climate challenges. These edited cattle can stay productive in hot weather, proving how helpful gene editing can be in keeping livestock healthy

The Roslin Institute in Scotland is another place that is doing great work on gene editing. Famous for cloning Dolly the sheep, it now uses CRISPR technology to boost disease resistance in dairy cattle. Its work shows that gene editing can increase productivity and improve health by stopping diseases from spreading. 

These examples prove that gene editing is more than a theory. It’s laying a strong foundation for a future where traditional breeding and new genetic technologies work together. As we see these changes, it’s clear that the leaders in this field are not just pushing technical limits but also focusing on making gene-edited cattle a reality in ethical and practical ways.

The Consumer Conundrum: Navigating the Perceptions and Pitfalls of Gene-Edited Dairy

People have mixed opinions about products made from gene-edited animals, including dairy, which makes it hard for everyone to accept them. A survey by Pew Research in 2023 found that about 50% of Americans think using gene editing on animals is a harmful use of technology, while only about 31% see it in a positive light [Pew Research 2023]. The public’s worries make sense because there’s been much pushback against GMO products before. A 2023 study by the International Food Information Council (IFIC) showed that 62% of people would not feel safe with gene-edited foods or animal products [IFIC Study 2023]

The UK’s reaction to Bovaer, a new feed additive that reduces methane emissions in dairy cattle, shows how skeptical people are towards new biotechnologies in farming. Even though Bovaer is praised for possibly making dairy farming more sustainable, it faces questions about food safety and its long-term impact on health and the environment. These fears are similar to gene-edited products, raising doubts about whether these advancements care more about profits than health. Critics worry about how little information is shared with consumers, arguing that they lack enough information to make informed decisions. 

All these debates focus on one thing: trust. Whether about feeds reducing methane or gene-editing cattle, technology will only move forward with public trust. Gaining this trust requires more than just showing the benefits: talking to the public, being transparent, and proving that safety checks are strict. The agricultural industry must listen to people’s worries and address them seriously, finding ways for new tech to exist alongside public approval. 

Despite these concerns, there’s hope. Younger people, usually open to new technology, might change how people see gene editing. However, building trust through clear information, labeling, and proving safety over time is essential for gene editing to succeed in stores. Marketing challenges continue, like educating people about the benefits of gene editing and showing how it’s different from GMOs. To change the negative “Frankenfood” image, industry leaders, regulators, and scientists need to work together.

The Bottom Line

In conclusion, gene editing is a big deal for the future of dairy breeding. It’s precise and fast, a massive step forward from old methods. Traditional methods have remained for good reasons: They’ve created strong systems for animal production and diversity. Mixing new technology with old knowledge seems not only wise but also necessary. 

Will gene editing start a new phase that renders old breeding methods useless, or will it just become part of what we already do in dairy farming? This critical question challenges us to think beyond technology and envision a future where new ideas work hand in hand with our values and ethics. 

As people involved in this story, we should all consider and discuss what gene editing means for farming. Having an open discussion about its ethical and technical sides isn’t just a good idea—it’s essential. How will these new tools change our dairy world? Let’s discuss and find a way to balance progress with tradition together.

Key Takeaways:

  • Gene editing, particularly CRISPR-Cas9, offers precision and rapid genetic improvements in dairy cattle, potentially outperforming traditional breeding methods.
  • While technological advancements are promising, concerns about off-target effects and efficiency variations warrant careful monitoring and further research.
  • Ethical considerations encompass animal welfare, dignity, and potential ecological impacts of genetically edited livestock.
  • Regulatory approaches are currently diverse, with some regions imposing strict rules similar to those for GMOs. This impacts global uniformity in gene-editing practices.
  • The dairy industry anticipates benefits from gene editing, yet consumer acceptance and cost considerations remain crucial hurdles.
  • Gene editing is likely to complement, rather than replace, traditional methods, creating a synergistic breeding strategy.
  • Maintaining genetic diversity while achieving targeted improvements should be a focal point in the future of dairy breeding.

Summary:

Imagine a world where dairy cows, designed for maximum efficiency and health, are no longer just a result of natural selection and traditional breeding but are products of precise genetic modifications. As the science of gene editing rapidly progresses, breeders utilize advanced tools like CRISPR-Cas9 to enhance traits, transforming the dairy industry’s foundational processes. This raises profound questions about the future: could this spell the end for traditional dairy breeding practices as we’ve known them? With the ability to swiftly introduce desired genetic attributes and eradicate undesirable ones, gene editing stands at the forefront of modern science. This method is faster, cheaper than older methods, and more accepted by laws and the public. However, challenges like efficiency changes remain, requiring continuous improvement of gene editing technologies. Ethical concerns, including animal welfare, dignity, environmental effects, and varying global regulatory standards, suggest gene editing will be a significant step for the future of dairy breeding. The central question remains: will it render old breeding methods obsolete or integrate into existing practices?

Learn more:

Join the Revolution!

Bullvine Daily is your essential e-zine for staying ahead in the dairy industry. With over 30,000 subscribers, we bring you the week’s top news, helping you manage tasks efficiently. Stay informed about milk production, tech adoption, and more, so you can concentrate on your dairy operations. 

NewsSubscribe
First
Last
Consent

The Legacy of Edg RUBICON: How a Pioneering Sire Transformed ST Genetics and the Dairy Industry

How did Edg RUBICON transform dairy farming forever? Discover his legacy and impact on the industry.

dairy production, Edg RUBICON-ET, STgenetics, genetic profile, TPI sire, NM$ sire, gender-sorted sperm, dairy breeding, genomics in breeding, sustainable dairy farming

The dairy industry mourns the passing of a giant. Edg RUBICON-ET, the bull that altered STgenetics and revolutionized dairy production, has died. His impact on the industry and his contribution to STgenetics’ early success are incalculable. Join us as we look at RUBICON’s extraordinary impact, from his groundbreaking contributions to gender-sorted sperm technology to his long-lasting legacy in genomics, as well as how RUBICON shaped the genetic landscape of dairy farming and spearheaded advances in sustainability and profitability. “RUBICON was a standout from the beginning, and as one of the first sires available in gender-sorted semen, he helped prove the value of this innovative technology to the global market,” said Juan F. Moreno, CEO and founder of STgen. Join us as we commemorate this famous sire’s legacy and reflect on the lessons he left for future dairy producers.

Remember the First Time You Heard About the Rubicon? 

Remember when you first heard about RUBICON? It’s like recalling the early days when a rookie became a legend. RUBICON was founded to set new standards for dairy breeding.

RUBICON was born with a superb genetic profile, instantly drawing dairy specialists’ attention. He has all of the characteristics of a game-changer from the start. But what distinguishes him? Juan F. Moreno, CEO and creator of STgenetics® said, “RUBICON was a standout from the start due to his genomic package. We realized we had something special on our hands.

Within his first several years, RUBICON swiftly progressed through the ranks. He wasn’t simply one of many sires. He was the top TPI (Total Performance Index) and NM$ sire, demonstrating the quality of his genetic package. This sparked a surge of hope and enthusiasm among breeders who saw the potential of their herds. His early success may be measured as over 38,000 daughters in 6,200 herds, counting [source]. This is not just remarkable; it’s incredible. Imagine the dependability and stability he gave to several dairy farms. It was like a domino effect, except for cows and milk outputs.

RUBICON’s impact grew beyond numbers as additional farms adopted his genetics. His fast acceptance demonstrated the breeders’ faith in him. According to studies, RUBICON helped demonstrate the importance of gender-sorted sperm. Technology, which was once in its infancy, has evolved into a trusted instrument, owing mainly to one bull demonstrating its promise. He was a pioneer among sires, forging a new, more efficient way across genetically unexplored territory.

There’s no doubt that RUBICON has had a pivotal role in influencing the future of dairy breeding. His early days serve as a reminder that sometimes you can tell when something—or someone—is destined for greatness.

Celebrating Rubicon’s Pioneering Legacy 

When considering Rubicon’s pioneering achievements, it is hard to miss his essential involvement in the field of gender-sorted sperm. He was a pioneer in the field, selling approximately 500,000 doses of gender-sorted semen. This breakthrough enabled dairy producers worldwide to attain more predictable and lucrative herd compositions, dramatically improving herd management procedures.

Furthermore, Rubicon demonstrated the power of genomics with great success. As a previous #1 TPI and NM$ sire, he confirmed using genetic data in breeding operations, as shown by his 38,000 daughters scattered throughout over 6,200 herds. His genetic blueprint resulted in exceptional offspring performance, confirming his top NM$ ranking among sires with over 30,000 daughters.

Rubicon also helped to make dairy farming more sustainable. As a renowned EcoFeed® sire, he was at the forefront of feed conversion efficiency, encouraging sustainability and profitability. This emphasis on eco-responsibility reflects his legacy of advocating for a more sustainable dairy sector.

The Rubicon’s inventions and successes influenced genetic developments and established new industrial norms. His tremendous and far-reaching influence continues to resound throughout the dairy farming sector.

Rubicon’s Influence: A Global Beacon of Genetic Excellence 

RUBICON’s impact extended beyond boundaries, reaching dairy farms all over the globe thanks to its remarkable genetic brilliance. His robust production profile and high components established a new benchmark for dairy breeding, improving herd performance worldwide. With almost 38,000 daughters in 6,200 herds, RUBICON’s genetic legacy is undeniable. He maintained his supremacy, ranking as the top NM$ sire in his age category among those having over 30,000 daughters in progeny proofs. Furthermore, RUBICON became the first industry sire to sell 500,000 doses of gender-sorted semen, demonstrating his worldwide popularity and long-term value in contemporary dairy production.

More Than Just Genetics: Rubicon’s Legacy in Sustainability and Profitability 

RUBICON was an expert in genetics and a pioneer in dairy farmer sustainability and profitability. His effect on feed conversion efficiency established a standard in the dairy sector. By enhancing the efficiency with which feed is converted into milk, RUBICON dramatically lowered feed expenditures, which account for a considerable amount of dairy farm expenses. This efficiency translates directly into lower carbon footprints since more excellent feed conversion requires fewer resources and produces less waste.

These developments resulted in substantial advantages for dairy farmers globally. For example, RUBICON’s offspring needed less nutrition to produce the same quantity of milk as daughters from other locations. This efficiency decreased operating costs and improved agricultural sustainability by reducing environmental impact. In a period when sustainability is just as important as profitability, RUBICON’s genetics provided a double edge, making him a top option for forward-thinking farmers.

Furthermore, his pioneering position as an EcoFeed® sire helped to promote environmentally beneficial methods. EcoFeed®-emphasized sires such as RUBICON promoted sustainable farming by choosing features that lead to better feed use. Consequently, farms that used these traits reported decreased feed inputs per unit of milk produced, which helped improve overall farm sustainability.

In short, RUBICON’s influence extended beyond genetic brilliance; he advocated for techniques that combined environmental responsibility with commercial benefit. His legacy of promoting sustainability via feed conversion efficiency has impacted the dairy farming industry, demonstrating how innovation can promote profitability and environmental responsibility.

Reflecting on Rubicon’s Legacy: What Truly Set Him Apart? 

As we consider Rubicon’s enduring impact, it is apparent that his achievements dramatically altered the landscape of contemporary dairy production. But what made the Rubicon so unique? Was it his unrivaled TPI and NM$ ratings or the incredible trust he gained among breeders worldwide?

Rubicon’s genetic brilliance highlighted the vast possibilities of genomics early on. This was more than a personal milestone; it established a standard for future sires and the business. With almost 38,000 daughters in 6,200 herds, his high-performance genetics are currently used in dairy companies worldwide. This vast effect assures that his exceptional characteristics, such as production efficiency and component quality, will benefit farmers for centuries.

However, the narrative continues with genetics. Rubicon was also an innovator in the field of technology. As the first sire to sell 500,000 doses of gender-sorted semen, he demonstrated the financial potential of this groundbreaking breeding technology. Thanks to its demonstrated profitability and sustainability, the use of gender-sorted sperm has subsequently become commonplace.

Looking forward, Rubicon’s legacy goes beyond stats and medals. His work to promote Feed Conversion Efficiency via EcoFeed® programs has sparked a sustainability wave in dairy production. This unique emphasis increases revenue while reducing the industry’s carbon impact, critical in today’s ecologically sensitive society.

Rubicon’s genetics and the technology he popularized will indeed stimulate future innovation. As dairy production changes, we can be sure that Rubicon’s effect will endure, paving the way for a more efficient and sustainable future.

The Bottom Line

The significance of the Rubicon cannot be emphasized. Rubicon has made an unmistakable impression on the dairy sector, establishing milestones for genetic developments and pioneering the use of gender-sorted semen. His genetic brilliance and sustainability successes have paved the way for future progress, showing how innovative breeding may result in profitability and environmental stewardship.

As we move ahead, we must ask ourselves: What else can we do to build on this legacy? How can we capitalize on Rubicon’s achievements to change dairy farming further? The future will undoubtedly provide new problems, but we have a solid basis for building with sires like Rubicon establishing the standard. The issue today is: Who will be the next Rubicon?

Summary:

Edg RUBICON-ET wasn’t just any sire; he was a legend who carved his name into the annals of the dairy industry. From being a pivotal figure in gender-sorted semen technology to influencing over 38,000 daughters across more than 6,200 herds, RUBICON left an indelible mark. His innovations and successes set new standards, and his legacy of promoting sustainability through feed conversion efficiency has made a lasting impact, proving that innovation can drive both profitability and environmental responsibility. Juan F. Moreno, CEO of STgen™, aptly remarked, “RUBICON was a standout from the beginning… congratulations to his breeders on providing us with such a monumental sire”. Celebrating his incredible achievements and pioneering legacy, we see how RUBICON’s influence continues to shape the future of dairy breeding, making him a global beacon of genetic excellence.

Key Takeaways:

  • Edg RUBICON-ET was a pivotal sire for STgenetics®, leaving a remarkable impact on dairy genetics worldwide.
  • He was instrumental in proving the value of gender-sorted semen technology.
  • His legacy includes over 38,000 daughters across more than 6,200 herds, demonstrating his dominance in genetic quality.
  • RUBICON was the first sire to sell 500,000 doses of gender-sorted semen, setting a benchmark in the industry.
  • He played a key role in advancing sustainability through Feed Conversion Efficiency.
  • STgenetics® continues to champion improved herd genetics, sustainability, and profitability for dairy farmers globally.

Learn more: 

Join the Revolution!

Bullvine Daily is your essential e-zine for staying ahead in the dairy industry. With over 30,000 subscribers, we bring you the week’s top news, helping you manage tasks efficiently. Stay informed about milk production, tech adoption, and more, so you can concentrate on your dairy operations. 

NewsSubscribe
First
Last
Consent

How ‘Feed-Saved’ Trait Can Slash Your Dairy Farms’ Costs

Unlock your farm’s profit potential. Learn how the ‘Feed-Saved’ trait can revolutionize feed efficiency and boost your profits. Ready to cut feed costs?

Have you ever wondered whether you reduce feed expenses without lowering milk production? Dairy producers sometimes spend the most on feed, accounting for more than half of farm expenditures. What if I told you there was a method to produce cows using less feed while producing more milk? Intrigued? You should be.

The Council on Dairy Breeding will release the ‘Feed-Saved’ (FSAV) trait in 2020, marking a watershed moment in dairy breeding history. Consider this: cows that save feed without reducing milk output. FSAV might be the game-changer we’ve all been waiting for. This characteristic assesses individual animals’ feed efficiency based on milk output, body weight, and condition.

This feature combines two essential factors: feed savings for more miniature cows and decreased Residual Feed Intake (RFI). FSAV is stated in pounds of dry-matter intake saved, which has the potential to increase profitability and resource efficiency in your dairy business significantly. The potential for greater profitability should inspire hope and optimism in dairy producers, encouraging them to investigate and use the FSAV trait.

Cutting the Feed Bill

Feed prices are a significant problem for dairy producers worldwide. Imagine operating a firm where more than half of your costs are attributed to a single component; this is the reality of dairy farming. According to the USDA ERS (2018), feed expenditures may account for more than half of a dairy farm’s overall costs. This figure demonstrates the significant cost of ensuring cows have enough to eat. However, it is not only about the quantity of feed; the quality and nutritional value of the feed are also important. High-quality feed is required, but it is expensive, raising overall expenditures. This makes programs like the Feed-Saved (FSAV) characteristic very beneficial. The FSAV trait provides promise by lowering the feed needed while maintaining milk output, alleviating the financial burden on dairy companies, and opening the path for a more sustainable future.

From Estimation to Precision: The Evolution of Feed Efficiency

Traditional approaches to enhancing feed efficiency often relied on approximate estimations and indirect selection criteria. Farmers usually assess overall output levels or body condition and use these markers to estimate feed efficiency. While useful, this strategy lacks the accuracy to optimize savings and profits. It also needs to account for differences in individual feed intake and metabolic efficiency.

Introducing the ‘Feed-Saved’ (FSAV) trait, a game changer in the dairy sector. FSAV compares actual and projected feed intake based on a cow’s productivity, body size, and condition. This exact measurement allows for a far more accurate assessment of feed efficiency, instilling confidence in its effectiveness.

The benefits of FSAV are compelling. It provides a precise and quantitative statistic. Holstein cows with a positive FSAV projected transmitting ability (PTA) may save up to 200 pounds of feed each lactation, lowering feed expenditures, which account for more than half of a farm’s overall expenses. More feed-efficient cows emit less methane, which aligns with environmentally friendly agricultural aims.

While conventional methodologies lay the framework, FSAV provides a more refined, data-driven approach. Its accuracy and potential for significant feed cost reductions make it a strong candidate for broader implementation, providing reassurance about its financial benefits. For farms looking to remain competitive and sustainable, FSAV might be a wise decision.

The ‘Feed-Saved’ trait (FSAV) is a game changer for dairy producers looking to reduce feeding expenditures. FSAV essentially identifies cows that eat less feed while producing the same—or higher—levels of milk. It calculates how much feed a cow saves based on her milk supply, body weight, and general condition. FSAV is stated in pounds of dry-matter intake saved, making it clear how efficient each cow is. Consider a cow that produces the same amount of milk as her contemporaries but consumes much less; this is the kind of efficiency that FSAV seeks to breed into your herd.

Unlocking the Mechanics Behind FSAV: Your Blueprint for Feed Efficiency 

So, how does the FSAV trait work? Let’s examine its two main components to understand.

Feed Saved When a Cow is Smaller: 

This feature focuses on the cow’s physical size. Smaller cows often need less feed to maintain body weight. This does not necessarily imply reduced milk output but indicates more efficient feed consumption. According to the USDA, feed expenditures may account for more than half of a dairy farm’s overall expenses. As a result, choosing smaller, more productive cows may dramatically cut costs while maintaining production.

Feed Saved When a Cow Has a Lower Residual Feed Intake (RFI):

Residual grain Intake (RFI) measures how effectively a cow turns grain into energy beyond what is required for maintenance and production. Cows with a lower RFI eat less feed while producing the same amount, making them more feed efficient. “Because this trait requires individual feed intakes from cows, data must be collected from research herds with that capability,” said Dr. Isaac Salfer, Assistant Professor of Dairy Nutrition at the University of Minnesota. Cheaper RFI equals cheaper feed costs and helps to minimize methane emissions, which aligns with environmental aims.

By concentrating on these two areas, the FSAV trait provides a potential strategy to improve feed efficiency, allowing you to save money while becoming more sustainable.

Why Feed-Efficient Cows Are the Key to Unlocking Dairy Farm Profitability

Choosing feed-efficient cows significantly improves dairy farm profitability. The USDA Economic Research Service has regularly demonstrated that feed expenditures may account for more than half of a dairy farm’s overall expenses, highlighting the need for efficiency [USDA ERS, 2018]. Dairy producers may drastically reduce costs by selecting the FSAV trait.

Furthermore, higher feed efficiency leads to better use of natural resources and energy, which is critical for sustainable dairy production. Studies by de Haas et al. (2011) and Waghorn et al. (2011) have shown that more feed-efficient cows eat less feed and emit less methane. This decrease in methane emissions coincides with larger environmental aims and contributes to lowering the dairy industry’s carbon footprint.

Enhancing feed efficiency via genetic selection achieves many essential goals: it promotes economic viability, increases sustainability, and contributes to environmental stewardship.

Reaping the Benefits of FSAV: A Step-by-Step Guide 

So, how can dairy producers begin to enjoy the advantages of the FSAV trait in their breeding programs? It’s easier than you would imagine. First, choose Holstein bulls and cows with a positive FSAV Predicted Transmitting Ability (PTA). These animals have the genetic potential to conserve feed every lactation, which translates into cheaper feed costs and increased profitability for your farm.

When analyzing genetic assessments, search for bulls with a high FSAV PTA value. For example, a bull with an FSAV PTA of +200 pounds suggests that its daughters will use 200 pounds less feed each lactation while producing the same volume of milk. That’s a substantial savings! Similarly, avoid bulls with negative FSAV levels to ensure you are not choosing for inefficiency.

FSAV is now only accessible to Holstein males and females, but good news is coming. Genetic experts are gathering further data to spread this vital characteristic to other breeds. As this study continues, being prepared and aware will put you ahead of the competition.

Consider your long-term breeding plan. Include FSAV in your selection criteria, among other important characteristics such as milk yield, health, and fertility. Using genetics allows you to make better choices and customize your herd to be more feed-efficient over time.

Remember that the real-world ramifications go beyond your food expenditure. More efficient cows eat less feed, generate less waste, and emit less methane. This is a victory for your farm’s sustainability objectives and the environment. As the dairy industry transitions to more sustainable methods, implementing features such as FSAV now might provide the groundwork for a flourishing, future-proof company.

Stay tuned when the FSAV trait is made more widely accessible and developed. Early adopters often get the most advantages, so immediately incorporate this game-changing characteristic into your herd development plans.

Top Holstein Sires for Feed Saved FSAV

Naab CodeNameReg NameBirth DateTPINet MeritPTA MilkPTA Fat% FatPTA Pro% Pro Feed Saved
551HO05276VoucherGenosource Voucher-ET202301143268145725341460.17930.05502
551HO05880BLackjackGenosource BLackjack-ET20230219322113217991280.37590.13477
551HO05516MedicGenosource Medic-ET202301063237136412791370.33740.13470
551HO05486Darth VaderOcd Thorson Darth Vader-ET202301033371150425431730.27900.03454
551HO05766RipcordOcd Thorson Ripcord-ET202304263416150918161550.31830.09447
551HO05461MeccaGenosource Mecca-ET202302263269140325171400.16820.01444
200HO13045CamryDanhof Camry-ET202304273254132520961240.16810.05440
551HO05223DyadicGenosource Dyadic-ET202207113183131015921530.34610.04439
551HO05434BogartGenosource Bogart-ET202302133233139419631550.29890.1430
200HO13040EffectiveBeyond Effective202306063202133621911240.14850.06429
007HO17537ShimmyOcd Easton Shimmy-ET202308113258130120421100.12820.06422
551HO05278DiggerDelicious Digger-ET202301153283141416711320.25840.11413
551HO05529Klass ActWinstar Gs Klass Act-ET202304063248137513711810.48780.13403
551HO05275VolcanoGenosource Volcano-ET202301133268141821531540.26870.07390
551HO05333SparksStgen Holly Sparks-ET202301183190127816731140.18690.06389
551HO05459LatteGenosource Latte-ET202301183182129711371290.32560.08389
745HO10258EastLadys-Manor East-ET202306093182126922191060.08820.04387
551HO06030DreamworldGenosource Dreamworld-ET202302083191126413391150.24640.08387
551HO04819BrockingtonGenosource Brockington-ET202112073187127916691350.26730.07385
029HO21549GlasgowPen-Col Denovo Glasgow-ET202305303215135122541280.15710383

Overcoming Initial Hurdles: The Path to Integrating FSAV into Commercial Herds 

The adoption of the FSAV trait has its challenges. One significant disadvantage is that FSAV assessments mainly rely on data from specialist research herds. This feature has yet to be tested in many commercial situations where dairy cows flourish. This constraint implies that the data pool is less than for other variables like milk output or reproductive efficiency.

FSAV has a heritability rate of around 19%, greater than health variables such as somatic cell score and daughter pregnancy rate but lower than many other production qualities. As more data is collected, the reliability of FSAV assessments is projected to improve. The current average dependability of young genomic bulls is approximately 28%, with progeny-tested bulls reaching around 38%. This intriguing development looks into a future where FSAV may be vital to dairy breeding efforts, improving environmental sustainability and farm profitability.

Frequently Asked Questions

  • How reliable are the genetic evaluations for the feed-saved trait?
  • The reliability of Feed Saved (FSAV) varies. Young genomic bulls had an average dependability of roughly 28%, compared to 38% for progeny-tested bulls. As more data are obtained, the reliability of these assessments is projected to improve.
  • What is the heritability of the feed-saved trait?
  • FSAV has an estimated heritability of around 19%, which is small but valuable. This heritability is lower for certain production variables but greater for others, such as somatic cell score and daughter pregnancy rate.
  • Will focusing on the feed-saved trait affect milk production?
  • Genetic connections between Residual Feed Intake (RFI) and milk yield features are almost nil by definition, implying that selecting for FSAV should have no negative influence on milk output. Small relationships (<10%) have been identified between features like Daughter Pregnancy Rate and illness resistance.
  • Does the feed-saved trait impact cow health?
  • The indirect influence on health-related qualities such as Daughter Pregnancy Rate and Disease Resistance is small yet beneficial. Because of its heredity and association patterns, choosing feed efficiency may concurrently increase both characteristics.
  • Is the feed-saved trait available for all breeds?
  • Currently, FSAV assessments are only offered for Holstein males and females. As more data becomes accessible, genetic experts want to extend this to additional breeds.
  • What are the economic benefits of selecting for the feed-saved trait?
  • FSAV has a high economic value, accounting for an estimated 21% of the Lifetime Net Merit Index (NM$). Selecting for this trait may significantly cut feed costs while increasing overall farm profitability.

The Bottom Line

The “Feed-Saved” (FSAV) trait emerges as a watershed moment in dairy production. Farmers may reduce expenses and increase profitability by choosing cows that produce the same amount of milk while eating less grain. The FSAV trait, combining feed savings from reduced cow sizes with lower Residual Feed Intake (RFI), can change individual dairy operations while aiding the industry’s sustainability and efficiency objectives. Current estimates indicate a significant economic benefit, making FSAV a desirable addition to any breeding plan.

As research continues to collect data and enhance the FSAV trait, the potential advantages to dairy producers become more appealing. Embracing this revolutionary characteristic might lead to increased profitability and a more sustainable future for dairy production. Are you prepared to take the next step toward a more lucrative and sustainable dairy farm?

Key Takeaways:

  • The feed-saved (FSAV) trait helps dairy farmers reduce feed costs while maintaining or boosting milk production.
  • FSAV measures the difference in feed consumption by considering milk production, body weight, and body condition factors.
  • Introduced 2020 by the Council on Dairy Breeding, FSAV currently applies to Holstein males and females.
  • The trait combines smaller cow feed savings and lower residual feed intake (RFI), saving pounds of dry-matter intake.
  • FSAV has an estimated heritability of 19%, offering a promising avenue for increased efficiency and sustainability in dairy farming.
  • Feed costs often account for over half of a dairy farm’s overall expenses, and FSAV can significantly alleviate these financial burdens.
  • By reducing the feed needed, FSAV supports cost savings and environmental sustainability in dairy farms.

Summary:

Dairy farmers constantly strive to cut costs and boost profitability. Feed, representing a significant portion of a farm’s expenses, is a critical area to target. Imagine cows producing the same or more milk while consuming less feed. The introduction of the feed-saved (FSAV) trait by the Council on Dairy Breeding in 2020 has made this possible. FSAV estimates the difference in feed consumption among cows, considering factors like milk production, body weight, and condition. This breakthrough could revolutionize dairy farming, offering substantial benefits from cost savings to environmental impact reduction. Currently applicable to Holstein males and females, FSAV combines smaller cow feed savings and lower residual feed intake (RFI), saving pounds of dry-matter intake. With a heritability estimate of 19%, FSAV offers a promising avenue for increasing dairy farm efficiency and sustainability. Feed costs are a significant problem for dairy producers, with expenses accounting for over half of a farm’s overall costs. FSAV can lower the feed needed while maintaining milk output, alleviating financial burdens on dairy farms, and paving the way for a more sustainable future.

Learn more: 

Dairying Breeding in 2025

Almost weekly, there are news updates on what dairying will be like in the next quarter year or the next year.  Just recently, there have been some significant alarms surrounding the farm gate milk price in the immediate future. Supply will exceed demand, and the milk price has already dropped to below the cost of production for UK dairymen. In the United States, the farm gate prices will be lower in 2015 than they have been in 2014. Yet in Australia, according to a leading A.I. manager, the strong demand for Australia milk in SE Asia could continue to keep the farm gate price level.

However, strategic planning on dairy farms and in dairy cattle breeding must look much further into the future than 3 to 24 months. We here at the Bullvine decided to consider global circumstances that will determine the genetics that will be needed in 2025 in order to assist breeders as they transition from their current breeding programs.

The future milk market will be vastly different than it is today:

  • Market Size There will be one billion more people by 2025. FAO predictions are that the demand for milk protein from dairy animal sources, including cows, goats, buffalo and sheep, will be in strong into the future. Market size could well be over 25% above what it is today. To keep pace with that expansion, breeders will need to increase production by 2.5% per year for the next ten years. Whether that is by increasing average cow production by 2.5%, cow numbers by 2.5% or a combination of both, will be a decision that each manager will need to make. Making no change in output will mean that the farm will fall behind. Not a good situation as the margin of revenue over costs narrows.
  • Milk Production LocationTwo current global trends will continue – urbanization everywhere and significant global population increases in Asia and Africa. An increase in milk production will need to occur on those two continents; otherwise considerable expense will be incurred in moving dairy products from the countries where production exceeds demand. Many developing countries have recognized the need for increased milk production and have already initiated programs to domestically produce a higher proportion of their milk. Breeders in developed countries cannot automatically expect to expand their volume of production in order to meet the demands for milk from Africa and Asia.
  • Milk Products The vast majority of milk will not be consumed in a liquid unprocessed form – it will be eaten. The trend toward consumers wanting natural products will continue. Consumers will know the product source and product composition in exacting detail. Breeders will need to be produce milk that has attributes for which they have not previously been paid. Processors will want to know more than the fact that the milk they buy is 4% butterfat and 3% protein. Processors will base their payment to producers on the level of specific proteins and/or fatty acid composition. Since breeders currently do not have genetic information on the composition of the protein or butterfat that their animals produce, they will be at a disadvantage compared to the processor. A2A2 milk in Australia (Read more: 12 Things You Need to Know about A2 Milk) already receives a premium farm gate price. Breeders there are already using sires genetically tested to be A2A2.

Dairy farming will be different as well:

  • Herd SizeIn developed countries a minimum of 300 – 500 cows will be needed to cover the cost for the purchase of technology. Breeders in those countries will design their operations based on their strengths and specialties. While in countries with developing dairy industries herd size will vary from a few cows per owner in village herds to very large herds that are located in close proximity to cities and that buy all their inputs. Breeding decisions will be made by groups of cows and not on an individual cow basis.
  • Automation There is no doubt that dairying, like all other modern industries, will undergo very significant changes in the degree of mechanization that will occur. Cows will be electronically monitored for a multitude factors. Managers will be focused on managing systems and will have much less time to attend to problem animals. The traditional definition of a breeder’s cow sense will be replaced by breeders using facts, figures, and information on which to base decisions. (Read more: The Future of Dairy Cattle Breeding Is in the Data and Robotic Milking: More than just automation it’s a new style of herd management.)
  • Feed – Forages and human food processing bi-products will form the majority of the animal diets. Dairy cow diets will be more finely tuned and balanced on a profit generated basis, instead of on a production level basis. Managers will make the investment to obtain expert advice.
  • Genetic Merit –The level of the genetic ability of the general population of dairy cows for their ability to return a profit to their owners will need to be 25-30% higher than it is today. Breeders, over the next decade, will need to invest in the genetics that return their farms the most profit.
  • Animal Welfare – Big strides will continue to be needed in animal welfare. Cow comfort and cow mobility will be continuously monitored and will be essential to herd profit. Consumers will demand that cows be polled, not be confined to a tie stall and treated humanely. Breeders will need to use genetic information to help address some of these issues.

Beyond the farms, other factors will affect dairy farming:

  • The Environment – Practices that are detrimental to the environment will not be tolerated. The current list of factors including greenhouse gas levels, GMOs, carbon footprint, and damaging product residues is only a short list of what farm managers will have to keep on top of in 2025.
  • Research / Education – Research and Development (R & D) will be an integral part of every business decision. Some farms will produce milk as well conduct R & D. Ownership of intellectual property will be closely guarded, which will be a new approach for many parts of dairy farming. Continuing education will be something farm managers will consider important to keep current with on a daily or weekly basis.

What will this all mean for animal breeding?

There will be no looking back. Cows will need to be different and genetically improved from what they have been in the past and what they are today. The changes in the TPI™ and NM$ formulae that will be implemented on December 2nd will not be progressive enough for 2025.

It will take research and development to change the genetics of our cows. It could even go as far as the need to develop a new breed or new strains of cows.  Breeders will need to take action. Breeders, their leaders and the suppliers of genetic products and services need to be taking time right now to understand how the genetic profiles of the cows of 2025 will need to be different than the genetic profiles of today’s cows.

The Bullvine Bottom Line

It cannot be assumed that someone other than breeders will address the challenges of developing the cows best suited for 2025. A vibrant, viable and sustainable dairy breeding industry in 2025 is not guaranteed, but it is possible. The payoff will be that the breeding industry will be able to shape its best future.

 

Get original “Bullvine” content sent straight to your email inbox for free.

 

Who Controls The Future of The Dairy Breeding Industry?

As I listen to breeder-to-breeder discussions and read the information that is produced and shared, I am asking myself “Have we lost our breeder minds?” Most of the details or information shared is about what non-breeders think. Organizations, media and governments have different agendas and goals than breeders have. The Bullvine feels strongly that breeders need to make their voices heard in defining the genetic systems and services that are absolutely necessary for future success.

The Gravy is Gone

Where once breeders could sell animals for good prices, the premiums are gone and there are minimal, if any, margins for selling average breeding stock (Read more: Who Killed The Market For Good Dairy Cattle? and An Insider’s Guide to What Sells at the Big Dairy Cattle Auctions 2013). Where once breeding a top proven sire would mean a nice royalty check, that farm development or retirement money is no longer there.  And, furthermore, buyers who once bought replacement animals from breeders have moved to using sexed semen and cross breeding and they now have their own reproductively efficient replacements.

Adjusting to Reality takes A C T I O N

Breeders are seeing a much different industry today than even just five years ago but they have not adjusted their business plans accordingly. Getting to the future in this era requires something other than following the past. Sexed semen, sexed embryos and cows with a hundred plus daughters are here. Genomic information has moved the focus to young animals (Read more:  Genomics – Opportunity is KnockingGenomics at Work – August 2013 and The End of the Daughter Proven Sire Era). Breeding decisions must be extended to include many more profit determining traits. And that only gets us to 2014. What will the industry look like in 2020 and beyond? In today’s terms that is only three to four generations of females away.

The Future – Bright & Sunny or a Tornado?

The Bullvine hears both scenarios. Some breeders have accepted that genomics is a very useful tool for their niche and plans. They see light at the end of the tunnel for themselves. Other breeders are asking questions – “Why have purebreds? Why test? Why record? Why participate? Why more traits? …Why, Why, Why?” For them they are in a tornado. Some of those breeders have already cashed in and moved on in their careers.  For those that remain in the breeding industry where are they being given support, representation or help?

We can learn from the Past

Breed societies were formed about a century ago to provide service to breeders in authentication and representation.  Breeders set aside their individual ideas or priorities for the collective good. They elected peers to represent them on boards that set policies, established recording systems and set the breed direction necessary to get us to where we are today. That took work. We need that kind of work today. It isn’t just holding down a seat at a board table. It means representation. It means vision. It means proactive leadership.

Does the collective good concept still hold today?  Cooperative A.I. organizations, formed 75 years ago by breeders, are in some cases being run as primarily as large corporations. Is the breeder voice being voiced? Being lost? Being heard?

Time for Breeders to Speak Up

So what has happened to our minds and our voices? Have they gone into hibernation or gone silent? Are we only huddling with likeminded breeders? Are we stuck in deep muddy ruts? Do we give good input to our elected officials?

Breeder organizations need to be looking to the future. Meetings seem to be the same old crowd talking about what’s wrong with the future. Breed promotion is, often, tied to the past not the future. It’s all about tradition in a time when we are in revolution.  Meetings are boring and ignored by innovative breeders. Discerning breeders take the time, when they have it, to provide input to boards, researchers and politicians. They often catch up or link up during a break time in their busy days.

If breeders do not work collectively and take action to position breeds then the move to bigger corporations setting the rules will win the day. This has happened in poultry and swine.

You can be Heard 24-7

Not everyone has time for meetings. Holding office is time consuming. Dairy breeding is 24-7.  There are ways to communicate 24-7. Several ways in fact. Social media is ready to carry your message whenever you are ready to give it. Some breeders may say that they prefer hard copy or face-to-face communications. But today that is passé.

The Bullvine Bottom Line

It is time for breeders to spend time, energy and resources to develop positions and make their wishes known. That will not happen by complaining to each other. It is time to stop leaving the action to others. Our future is in our own hands and key pads. The time for sitting back and watching is long past. Are you speaking up for the future of breeds and tomorrow’s breeders?

Get original “Bullvine” content sent straight to your email inbox for free.

Send this to a friend