Image
FacebookEmailTwitterRSS

Slide 8
Slide 8
Slide 8
Slide 7
Slide 7
Slide 7
Slide 5
Slide 5
Slide 5
Slide 5
Slide 5
Slide 5
Style_Bullvine
Style_Bullvine
Style_Bullvine
Overlays

Archive for culling rates

Boosting Milk Fat and Reducing Culling Rates with Rumen-Protected Methionine for Holstein Cows

Saturday, August 31st, 2024

Learn how rumen-protected methionine boosts milk fat and lowers culling rates in Holstein cows. Ready to improve your herd’s health?

Summary: Feeding rumen-protected methionine to Holstein cows during the peripartum period has remarkably improved milk fat content and reduced culling rates within commercial herds. Rumen-protected methionine transforms feeding strategies by targeting specific nutritional needs during a critical cycle phase in a cow’s lifecycle. RPM enhances protein synthesis, metabolic function, and keratin production, particularly benefitting high-productivity Holsteins and boosting lactation performance under heat stress. A meta-analysis from 2010 to 2022 highlighted RPM’s superiority over choline during the peripartum period, thereby increasing milk output, herd health, and milk quality by raising milk fat content by 0.2%. These advancements underscore RPM’s significant impact on dairy farm productivity and animal welfare.

  • Rumen-protected methionine (RPM) optimizes feeding strategies during the peripartum period.
  • Enhances protein synthesis and metabolic functions in high-yielding Holstein cows.
  • Significantly improves milk fat content and overall milk quality.
  • Proven to reduce culling rates within commercial herds.
  • More effective than choline in boosting lactation performance during heat stress.
  • RPM contributes to better herd health and higher productivity.
rumen-protected methionine, dairy cow nutrition, protein synthesis, metabolic function, keratin production, high-productivity dairy cows, Holsteins, lactation performance, heat conditions, meta-analysis, nutritional intake, milk output, milk protein synthesis, milk fat yield, peripartum period, choline, postnatal performance, nutritional benefits, milk output, herd health, dairy producers, rumen environment, high-yielding dairy cows, milk fat content, low-quality milk production, methionine supplementation, milk quality, heat stress, summer months, dairy industry, milk fat content, culling rates, Holsteins, peripartum feeding strategy, commercial herd performance

Picture a thriving dairy farm where every Holstein cow is at its peak, producing the highest quality milk, and culling rates are at their lowest. The secret to this success? It’s the transformative power of rumen-protected methionine, a simple yet potent treatment. You can significantly increase milk fat content and reduce culling rates by feeding rumen-protected methionine at the critical peripartum phase. This crucial vitamin can unlock your herd’s full potential, ushering in a new era of production and profitability.

Understanding Rumen-Protected Methionine

Methionine is not just any amino acid; it’s an essential one that dairy cows cannot produce independently. It plays a unique and crucial role in protein synthesis, metabolic function, and the creation of keratin, which is vital for hoof health. In nursing cows, methionine is also required for optimum milk protein production.

Rumen-protected methionine is a dietary supplement used in dairy cow nutrition to guarantee that methionine, an essential amino acid, is efficiently transported to the small intestine for absorption rather than being destroyed in the rumen. This technique improves dairy cows’ nutritional efficiency and health, producing higher milk output and quality.

Rumen-protected methionine is intended to circumvent the rumen fermentation process. This is often accomplished by encapsulating or coating methionine with compounds that can withstand degradation by rumen microorganisms while dissolving in the small intestine’s lower pH.  Here’s the step-by-step process:

  1. Encapsulation: Methionine is coated with a protective layer, often made from fats or pH-sensitive polymers.
  2. Rumen Bypass: The encapsulated methionine passes through the rumen without being degraded by the microbial population.
  3. Release in the Small Intestine: Once in the small intestine, where the environment is less acidic than in the rumen, the protective coating dissolves, releasing the intact methionine for absorption into the bloodstream.

A Game Changer for Holsteins

As you may already know, rumen-protected methionine (RPM) is essential to dairy cow diets. Researchers have been working to guarantee that it provides the most advantages, particularly for high-productivity dairy cows such as Holsteins. New research suggests that including RPM in a cow’s diet significantly improves lactation performance under demanding situations such as heat. Pate et al. found that RPM dramatically increases milk’s protein and fat contents during these stressful times. The results represent a significant milestone in the dairy farming business.

A targeted meta-analysis between 2010 and 2022 extensively analyzed RPM’s influence on dairy cows’ nutritional intake, milk output, accurate milk protein synthesis, and milk fat yield. The research shed light on RPM’s functional duties and offered valuable advice on using it most effectively. Increasing milk fat and protein content increases the value of dairy products, including milk, cheese, and yogurt. As a result, RPM not only improves Holstein cow health and nutrition, but it also benefits the commercial dairy industry.

Interestingly, feeding RPM during the peripartum period was more effective than giving choline. Dairy cows’ postnatal performance increased when RPM was added to their diet before and after birth. This method increased lactation performance and optimal plasma amino acid concentrations, providing nutritional benefits to the cows. This may boost milk output and enhance herd health, benefiting dairy producers financially. The goal is to achieve the ideal RPM feeding ratio while ensuring cow well-being and increased milk output. This study examines the impact of rumen-protected methionine in the total mixed diet before and after the calf’s birth on dairy cow lactation performance and plasma amino acid levels.

Unlocking the Potential: Benefits of Feeding Rumen-Protected Methionine

You’re on the right track if you’ve incorporated rumen-protected methionine (RPM) into your feed regimen. Multiple studies from 2010 to 2022, conducted with rigorous scientific methods, have consistently shown that this supplement improves dairy cattle’s health and output capability. These are anecdotal outcomes and solid evidence of RPM’s efficacy, giving you confidence in its benefits. Cows given rumen-protected methionine saw a significant increase in milk output by 1.5 kg/day.

Indeed, the value of RPM stems from its fantastic persistence. Its changed shape guarantees that it can endure the rumen’s harsh environment. By avoiding the danger of deterioration, high-yielding dairy cows may thoroughly enjoy the beneficial properties of this vitamin. Incorporating RPM into your dairy cows’ diet considerably boosts milk fat and protein content, solving issues about low-quality milk production. Recent research found that methionine supplementation throughout the peripartum period raised milk fat content by 0.2%, thereby improving milk quality.

The advantages extend beyond improved milk quality. Methionine, in its rumen-safe form, has shown to be an ally throughout the searing summer months, assisting cows in dealing with heat stress and enhancing their overall performance. This supplementation has also resulted in a 10% drop in culling rates and the occurrence of metabolic diseases, ensuring optimum animal care while reducing long-term expenses. Using RPM improves both your herd’s health and your financial line, demonstrating your dedication to both.

The direct delivery of methionine to the small intestine offers several benefits:

  • Enhanced Milk Production: By maintaining proper methionine levels, dairy cows may produce milk with a higher protein content, which is critical for dairy profitability.
  • Improved Milk Quality: Methionine raises milk’s casein content, improving its nutritional value and processing properties.
  • Better Animal Health: Adequate methionine promotes improved hoof health and general physiological processes, lowering the likelihood of conditions such as laminitis.
  • Efficient Feed Utilization: Protecting methionine from rumen breakdown enables more effective utilization of feed proteins, potentially lowering feed costs.

Feeding RPM before and after calving (during the peripartum period) leads to significant lactation performance gains, as seen by high amino acid concentrations in dairy cow plasma. This precedent-setting decision is supported by other investigations, including the 2020 deep-dive research done by Pate, Luchini, Murphy, and Cardoso. Science has never spoken louder. Adding rumen-protected methionine to your Holstein cows’ diet promotes fat-filled milk output and improves farm stability. Pivot to RPM now and put your herd up for unrivaled success.

The Power of Peripartum Nutrition: A Strategy to Curb Culling Rates

You may wonder how this extraordinary rumen-protected methionine (RPM) contributes to lower culling rates. Buckle up because we’re about to discover some incredible details. Culling rates in Holstein cows fell by 5% with the introduction of rumen-protected methionine. It is vital to note that the peripartum interval, which lasts three weeks before and after parturition, is a critical time of metabolic shift for dairy cows. Dietary shortages in this crucial period might cause health problems, increasing culling rates. This is when RPM comes into play.

Researchers discovered that RPM had a much more significant influence on postpartum performance in cows given with it than choline during periportal intervals. This supplement may help increase energy-corrected milk output, protein content, and nitrogen efficiency. RPM was also shown to improve embryo size and fertility in multiparous cows—a significant result given that a more extensive, healthier calf has a greater chance of survival and production. A recent study of 470 multiparous Holstein cows found that RPM improved lactation performance even under heat stress, indicating that its effects do not decline under less-than-ideal settings.

RPM is more than a nutrition supplement; it is a game changer focusing on dairy cows’ long-term health and production, reducing culling rates. Implementing a comprehensive peripartum feeding strategy that includes RPM may significantly boost a commercial herd’s performance.

The Bottom Line

As we conclude, consider how rumen-protected methionine transforms the dairy industry’s future. This innovative supplement has changed the game by drastically increasing milk fat content and lowering culling rates in Holsteins. These significant results have raised expectations for high-quality dairy products and long-term profitability in large-scale enterprises. While critical details, such as the mechanics of methionine supply, remain unknown, ongoing research supported by business collaborations promises a better future. The complicated interaction of nutrition and energy is critical. With rumen-protected methionine, Holsteins are positioned for more excellent health, increased output, and less culling—a fantastic outcome for the industry.

Learn more:

Categories : Nutrition
Tags : , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

How Hormonal Management Boosts Dairy Farm Revenues by $27,000 Annually

Friday, August 30th, 2024

Discover hidden profits on your dairy farm and boost annual revenues by €23,764 with systematic hormonal management. Ready for the transformation?

Are you fully tapping into your dairy farm’s profit potential? Could a simple adjustment in your herd management method unlock additional revenue? These questions hold the key for every dairy farmer to take charge of their farm’s profitability and look forward to a more prosperous future.

Reproductive success in dairy cows is not just about increasing the number of calves; it’s a direct path to your dairy farm’s profitability. Enhanced reproductive function leads to shorter calving intervals, better pregnancy rates, and a significant boost in milk production. Studies have proven that improved reproductive management not only increases profitability but also instills hope for a brighter future by raising milk outputs and lowering culling rates.

“The profitability due to improved reproductive performance is mainly associated with higher milk revenues.” – Meadows et al., 2005

In this article, we’ll explore the economic impact of cow-based reproductive management programs that use systematic hormonal treatments compared to those based on veterinary diagnoses during fertility checks. You’ll discover: 

  • The different hormone-based reproductive protocols available and their benefits.
  • A breakdown of how these programs affect milk production, calving rates, and overall profitability.
  • Key findings from a comprehensive bio-economic simulation model applied to a typical 200-cow herd.
  • Actionable insights for deciding which reproductive management strategy could provide the highest economic return.

Continue reading to learn how to increase income and simplify reproductive control using systematic hormonal therapies.

Ever Wondered How to Supercharge Your Dairy Farm’s Efficiency? Explore Hormonal Management! 

Have you ever wondered how dairy producers maintain their cows’ reproductive health and productivity? Hormonal control is not just significant; it’s crucial. Let’s explore this topic and gain a deeper understanding of some typical methods.

First, hormonal management entails controlling and improving dairy cow reproductive efficiency by administering certain hormones. This strategy ensures that cows are bred at the proper time, resulting in constant milk output and farm profitability.

Three popular hormonal therapies are PRIDsynch, Ovsynch, and Double-Ovsynch regimens.

  • PRIDsynch Protocol
  • During the PRIDsynch regimen, a progesterone-releasing intravaginal device (PRID) is used for about one week. Think of it as a hormonal “restart” button. Following the removal of the device, the cow gets hormone injections to induce ovulation. This allows cows not to display obvious symptoms of being ready to reproduce, ensuring they are inseminated at the appropriate time.
  • Ovsynch Protocol
  • The Ovsynch protocol is similar to a fine-tuned timetable. To sync all of the cows’ cycles, hormone injections are administered over ten days. In this manner, the farmer knows when each cow is ready for artificial insemination. It’s like setting an alarm for ovulation!
  • Double-Ovsynch Protocol
  • Double-Ovsynch takes synchronization a step further. It runs the Ovsynch protocol twice, providing even more precise timing for Double-Ovsynch, extending the concept of synchronization. It executes the Ovsynch protocol twice, enabling even more exact timing for insemination. This is especially effective for cows with irregular periods or to improve overall herd fertility.

Here’s how these protocols might work: Imagine Farmer John owns a cow named Bella who isn’t in heat. John utilizes the PRIDsynch protocol to ensure Bella receives the hormonal signals to ovulate. John may use the Ovsynch technique with his herd of 50 cows to ensure they all ovulate simultaneously. If he wants to provide the best possible success percentage, he may even use the Double-Ovsynch protocol.

These measures promote cow health while also increasing farm efficiency and profitability.

So, What Did the Study Find When Comparing Different Reproductive Management Programs? Here’s a Digestible Breakdown for You: 

First, describe the standard reproductive management program used in Dutch dairy cows. In this system, cows are inseminated based on estrus detection. If the cow is not in heat, vets provide hormone therapy according to the detected condition—anestrus, cystic ovarian disease (COD), or sub-estrus. Consider the issue solution case-by-case, but only after the identified problems.

Compare this to the three systematic hormone-based programs: FTAI, FTAI+ED, and ED+TAI. These methods use hormone therapy more methodically, depending on certain days in milk (DIM), rather than waiting for a problem to be identified.

  • FTAI (Fixed-Time Artificial Insemination): Hormones are administered to all cows commencing at 50 ± 3 DIM, with insemination occurring at 77 ± 3 DIM. Non-pregnant cows are assessed after insemination for the presence of a corpus luteum (CL) and treated accordingly—those with a CL get the Ovsynch procedure, and those without PRIDsynch.
  • FTAI+ED (Fixed-Time AI with Estrus Detection): This extends the FTAI technique by detecting estrus in subsequent inseminations. If a cow exhibits estrus, she is inseminated again. If not, she is evaluated and either given further hormone medication or is found to be pregnant.
  • ED+TAI (Estrus Detection followed by Timed AI) combines ocular estrus detection and systematic hormone usage. If a cow is not recognized in estrus by a specific point (91 DIM), she goes through a PRIDE protocol.

The research used a sophisticated computer model of a 200-cow dairy herd to compare these treatments objectively. This model included daily reproductive events, hormone administrations, and economic variables. By modeling a year, They assessed each program’s effects on essential indicators like calving intervals, total milk output, and net financial return.

What distinguishes this research is its practical applicability. They used approaches that mirror practical agricultural management practices. Farmers might consider DIM-specific treatments regular maintenance rather than waiting for a machine to break down before correcting it. The contrast demonstrates how proactive, rather than reactive, hormone treatment may improve reproductive efficiency and economic benefits.

The systematic programs—particularly FTAI+ED—provided more significant economic advantages via improved reproductive performance and fewer culls despite higher initial expenses for hormones and monitoring. Intrigued? Consider implementing more systematic hormone usage in your dairy enterprise!

Unlocking New Profit Avenues: Financial Gains from Systematic Hormone-Based Programs 

The study shows that implementing systematic hormone-based reproductive control programs can significantly boost a dairy farm’s economic performance. Let’s look at the financial benefits indicated by the report. Increasing Net Economic Return (NER): Compared to conventional approaches, the Fixed-Time Artificial Insemination with Estrus Detection (FTAI+ED) program achieves a net income gain of €23,764 per year. Not far behind, the FTAI program and the combination of Detection of Estrus followed by Timed Artificial Insemination (ED+TAI) generated net revenue increases of €19,550 and €14,314 per year, respectively. This data demonstrates the potential for significant economic advantages from adopting these initiatives, which should be a source of encouragement and excitement for dairy farmers.

“Systematic hormone-based reproductive management programs present economic advantages by reducing culling rates and boosting the production of milk and calves per cow per year” (Wijma et al., 2018).

Cost-Benefit Analysis: While the systematic programs had more significant expenditures because of increased hormone administration, calving, and feed prices, the income from increased milk and calf production greatly surpassed these costs. For example, the FTAI+ED program had an extra yearly price of €8,953. Still, it produced €32,654 in more significant revenues, resulting in a net gain.

“The additional revenues from milk and calves in systematic hormone-based programs substantially outweigh the total costs, making them economically advantageous” ([Santos et al., 2017]).

If you’re thinking about improving your reproductive control plan, the research says it’s well worth the cost. These discoveries might lead to increased profitability and efficiency on your dairy farm.

Turning Theory into Practice: The Real-World Benefits of Hormonal Management on Your Dairy Farm 

Implementing these hormone management programs on your dairy farm is not theoretical; it is a practical way to boost output and earnings. Here are some helpful instructions and hints to help you complete the procedure.

First, understand that although the early expenditures for hormone therapies and calving control may be more significant, these efforts will pay off. Systematic hormone programs like Double-Ovsynch or Ovsynch may boost your cows’ reproductive function, resulting in more pregnancies, calves, and increased milk output. Yes, your feed and hormone prices will increase, but so will your milk and calf sales.

Here’s how to get started: 

  • Assess Your Current Reproductive Management: Recognize your baseline. How frequently do your cows get pregnant? What are your present expenses and revenue? Knowing where you’re starting may help you track your progress correctly.
  • Consult with a Veterinarian: A veterinarian can assist you in developing a tailored hormone program based on your herd’s unique requirements. Diagnostic visits will be required to diagnose and treat ovarian dysfunctions properly.
  • Calculate the Investment: Hormones are not free. For example, a PRIDsynch protocol might cost roughly €14.55 per unit, but a Double-Ovsynch could require numerous doses. Consider these costs and the added labor expenses associated with administering these hormones when calculating your budget.
  • Monitor Your Feed Costs: More pregnant cows equals more significant feed expenditures. Updated feed regimens should guarantee that you maintain pregnant cows’ health while improving overall feed efficiency.
  • Regularly Review Economic Returns: Keep track of your milk and calf earnings. Compare the increase in income to the increase in expenditures to ensure the balance is in your favor. Bio-economic models and farm management software are valuable tools in this context.
  • Improve Estrus Detection: Use sensors or visual approaches to improve your estrus detection rate. This reduces the number of hormone applications required and ensures optimum timing for insemination.

Balancing these aspects entails more than paying extra hormones or earning more from milk and calves. It requires ongoing monitoring and adjustment depending on the data. Farms that actively manage these areas might improve profitability by lowering needless expenditures and increasing revenues.

Ultimately, the key is customization. Tailor hormonal management programs to your herd’s demands and farm circumstances. Doing so may increase productivity and profitability, making these systematic hormone administrations a sensible investment for your dairy operation.

Navigating Concerns: Clearing Up Common Misconceptions About Hormonal Management 

Adopting a hormone-based reproductive control regimen might raise legitimate worries and misunderstandings. Let’s delve into some common fears and clarify them: 

  • Is Hormone Use Safe for My Cows?
  • Absolutely. Hormone protocols such as PRIDsynch, Ovsynch, and Double-Ovsynch have been intensively researched and utilized worldwide for years. They have been proven safe when properly given by experienced personnel. These regimens mirror regular hormonal cycles, reducing suffering for the cows.
  • Will Hormone Treatments Hurt My Cows?
  • No, hormone therapies do not hurt cows. The treatments include well-tolerated intravaginal devices and injections akin to vaccinations. The objective is to increase reproductive efficiency while inflicting no pain or long-term discomfort on the animal. Proper management and veterinary oversight assure the cows’ well-being.
  • Are There Legal and Ethical Issues?
  • Many nations, notably the Netherlands and the United States, have laws governing hormone usage and deem it ethical. These restrictions guarantee that hormone delivery is safe for animals and dairy consumers. Always adhere to local norms to ensure compliance and ethical standards.
  • Will Hormone Use Affect Milk and Meat Quality?
  • Studies have shown that hormones such as the PRIDsynch and Ovsynch regimens have no harmful influence on milk or meat quality. The treated hormones break down fast and do not remain in milk or meat, ensuring consumer safety. Regular monitoring and adherence to withdrawal periods ensure quality [FDA].
  • Is It Worth the Cost?
  • Indeed, the initial expenditures for hormone therapy may seem onerous, but the economic advantages far surpass these costs. Hormone-based reproductive control systems result in improved milk outputs, increased calf production, and lower culling rates, which increases farm profitability. This research found significant net economic returns when moving from conventional to more systematic hormone usage.

Understanding these facts helps ease everyday worries, helping dairy producers like you to make more educated choices about using hormone-based reproductive control programs. These systems offer increased farm efficiency while also ensuring the health and well-being of your herd.

Ready to Dive into Implementing a Hormone-Based Reproductive Management Program on Your Dairy Farm? 

Here’s a step-by-step guide to get you started: 

  • Selecting the Right Protocols
  • Start by evaluating your herd’s specific needs. Are you dealing with anestrus, cystic ovarian disease (COD), or sub-estrus? The default PRIDsynch, Ovsynch, and Double-Ovsynch protocols can be tailored to address these issues effectively. Consult your veterinarian to choose the best protocols that align with your herd’s reproductive challenges and goals.
  • Training Your Staff
  • Implementing these protocols will require your team to be well-versed in administering hormone treatments. Organize training sessions where your veterinarian or a reproductive specialist can demonstrate the procedures. Ensure that every team member understands the timing, administration methods, and safety measures for hormone treatments.
  • Monitoring and Recording Results
  • Keep detailed records of each cow’s treatment schedule, reproductive status, and outcomes. Use herd management software to track data seamlessly. Review this data regularly to monitor the program’s effectiveness. Check for improvements in key metrics like calving intervals, pregnancy rates, and overall milk production. 
  • Consistency is Key
  • Consistency in administration and monitoring is crucial. Stick to the schedules without deviation to ensure the highest chance of success. Periodically consult your veterinarian to make any necessary adjustments based on your herd’s performance.
  • Review and Adjust
  • After a few cycles, assess the program’s overall impact. Are you seeing improvements? What challenges have you encountered? Use this information to refine your approach, focusing on areas with the most significant room for improvement. 

By following these steps, you’ll be well on your way to enhancing your dairy farm’s reproductive performance and boosting profitability.

FAQ: Common Questions About Hormone-Based Reproductive Management Programs 

What are the benefits of using hormone-based reproductive programs? 

Hormone-based reproductive control systems may considerably enhance reproductive performance, resulting in shorter calving intervals, more milk output, and greater profitability for dairy farms.

Is hormone use safe for my cows? 

Cow hormone therapies are safe when done carefully and under veterinarian supervision. These therapies are intended to control reproductive cycles and increase total herd fertility without causing damage.

Will hormone treatments hurt my cows? 

No, hormone therapies are intended to help your cows by regulating their reproductive cycles. Procedures are easy and given in a manner that reduces tension and pain.

Are there legal and ethical issues? 

Hormone usage in dairy production is strictly controlled to protect animal welfare and food safety. Always follow local rules and veterinarian recommendations to ensure ethical standards and legal compliance.

Will hormone use affect milk and meat quality? 

When properly implemented and regulated, hormone treatments do not hurt the quality of milk or meat produced by treated cows. Product safety is ensured by regular testing and adherence to withdrawal periods.

Is it worth the cost? 

While hormone therapies incur certain costs, the financial benefits of more excellent reproductive performance, increased milk output, and lower culling rates often surpass these costs, resulting in higher profitability.

The Bottom Line

According to the research, comprehensive hormone-based reproductive control programs improve dairy farms’ reproductive performance and overall profitability. Implementing these methods may shorten the calving interval, minimize culling rates, and boost milk and calf production. The higher expenses connected with these initiatives are more than covered by improved revenues, resulting in significant net economic benefits.

So, are you prepared to discover hidden earnings on your dairy farm? Take the first step towards increasing your farm’s earnings now.

Key Takeaways:

  • Systematic use of reproductive hormones can enhance dairy farms’ reproductive performance and profitability.
  • Integration of hormone-based reproductive management leads to shorter calving intervals and higher milk yields.
  • Higher net economic returns observed with systematic programs like FTAI, FTAI+ED, and ED+TAI.
  • Annual net revenues can increase by up to €23,764 ($27,000US) compared to default management practices.
  • Despite higher costs, additional revenues from systematic hormone use outweigh expenses, making it a valuable investment.
  • Improved reproductive performance includes shorter calving to first AI intervals and increased calf production.

Summary:

Integrating hormone-based reproductive management programs in your operation could be a game-changer if you’re a dairy farmer looking to boost your herd’s productivity and profitability. Recent studies have shown that systematic use of reproductive hormones can substantially enhance the reproductive performance of dairy cows, resulting in shorter calving intervals, higher milk yields, and, ultimately, greater financial returns. “Compared with the default reproductive management program, the highest net economic return was observed for systematic hormone-based programs, adding up to €23,764 ($27,000US) more in net revenues yearly.” Source Systematic hormone use leads to improved reproductive performance and calving to first AI intervals, along with higher milk and calf production, positively impacting overall farm profitability. Increased costs are outweighed by additional revenues, making hormone-based programs a viable investment. The study compares these treatments to three systematic hormone-based programs: FTAI, FTAI+ED, and ED+TAI, revealing significant improvements in economic performance.

The Bullvine Daily

Dairy producers often have limited time to stay updated on the latest news in the dairy industry. With the industry changing rapidly, they need to operate their dairy more like an agribusiness. To help dairy producers stay updated, Bullvine Daily was created. The daily ezine provides a summary of the week’s news that pertains most to a dairy farmer. To receive these summaries, dairy producers can join the over 40,000 subscribers who already subscribe and complete the simple form below. They will also be automatically entered into monthly draws for great prizes. The Bullvine Daily helps dairy producers stay informed about the latest events in the industry, helping them operate their dairy more effectively. By not having to read all the latest news sites, dairy producers can stay up-to-date on what they might have missed.

NewsSubscribe
First
Last
Consent

Learn more: 

Categories : Management
Tags : , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

The Hidden Costs of Retained Placentas: Is Your Farm at Risk?

Wednesday, July 31st, 2024

See how tackling retained placentas can increase your dairy farm‘s profits. Learn strategies to boost your herd’s health. Ready for a transformation?

Summary: Retained placentas (RP) are a significant issue in dairy farming, affecting the farm’s bottom line in various ways. RP occurs when the placenta or fetal membranes are not ejected within the standard period, typically 24 hours after calving. This failure to separate the placenta from the uterine wall, aided by hormonal and enzymatic interactions, leads to retention, which may predispose cows to further issues like infection and decreased fertility. Retained placentas occur between 5 and 15% of dairy cows, with this range varying depending on genetics, diet, and general herd management approaches. The economic effect of RP is immediate and long-term, affecting milk output, reproductive difficulties, and overall economic losses. Managing these health difficulties entails higher feed prices, labor, and tighter health procedures. The financial impact of RP goes beyond acute treatment, with research by the University of Wisconsin finding that RP may cost up to $300 per cow, including lower milk output, more outstanding vet fees, and possibly losing cows to culling. Genetic selection is a game-changing strategy for dairy farmers to manage retained placentas in their herds.

  • Incidence and Impact: Retained placentas (RP) occur in 8-12% of dairy cows and can severely impact milk production and overall cow health. 
  • Economic Consequences: The cost associated with RP includes treatment, reduced milk yield, and potential fertility issues, which can add up to significant financial losses.
  • Genetic Influence: Selecting breeds with lower incidences of RP can mitigate risks. Genetic selection plays a crucial role in long-term prevention.
  • Preventive Measures: Proper nutrition, adequate mineral intake, and stress reduction are proactive steps to prevent RP.
  • Timely Intervention: Early identification and immediate veterinary intervention are critical in managing RP effectively.

Did you know 8–12% of dairy cows have retained placentas after calving? This prevalent problem may result in an average economic loss of $200 per cow, severely affecting a dairy farm’s bottom line. Addressing this issue front-on is critical to enhancing herd health and guaranteeing the profitability of your dairy enterprise. But why is retained placenta a significant problem, and what can be done about it? Look at this problem to find practical answers and protect your farm’s financial health.

Why Your Dairy Operation Can’t Afford to Ignore Retained Placentas! 

YearStudyIncidence RateLocationNotes
2015National Dairy Study7.5%USALarge-scale survey
2020Management and Welfare Study8.3%UKIncludes various farm sizes
2018Nutrition Impact Review6.8%CanadaFocus on feed quality

Understanding retained placentas starts with identifying what they are: a retained placenta, also known as retained fetal membranes (RFM), happens when the placenta or fetal membranes are not ejected within the standard period, typically 24 hours after calving. Biologically, this procedure depends on properly separating the placenta from the uterine wall, aided by hormonal and enzymatic interactions. Failure of these procedures leads to retention. Such events may predispose cows to further issues like infection and decreased fertility. According to the University of Minnesota Extension, retained placentas occur between 5 and 15% of dairy cows. This range might vary depending on genetics, diet, and general herd management approaches.

Understanding retained placentas starts with identifying what they are: a retained placenta, also known as retained fetal membranes (RFM), happens when the placenta or fetal membranes are not ejected within the standard period, typically 24 hours after calving. Biologically, this procedure depends on properly separating the placenta from the uterine wall, aided by hormonal and enzymatic interactions. Failure of these procedures leads to retention. Such events may predispose cows to further issues like infection and decreased fertility.

According to the University of Minnesota Extension, retained placentas occur between 5 and 15% of dairy cows. This range might vary depending on genetics, diet, and general herd management approaches.

Don’t Let Retained Placentas Drain Your Dairy’s Profits! 

Economic ImpactCost (USD) per IncidentDetails
Treatment Costs$100 – $200Veterinary fees, antibiotics, and other medications are necessary to treat RP and prevent secondary infections.
Decreased Milk Production$250 – $400Cows with RP often suffer from reduced milk yield due to their impaired health and immune response.
Increased Culling Rate$800 – $1,200Cows with RP are more likely to be culled early, leading to higher replacement costs and lost production.
Extended Calving Interval$1.50 per dayThe delay in returning to normal reproductive cycles can impact your overall herd fertility rates.
Overall Economic Loss$500 – $3,000Combining all these factors, the total economic impact of RP per case can significantly affect your bottom line.

The economic impact of retained placentas (RP) on dairy farming is immediate and long-term, affecting your pocketbook in various ways. First and foremost, milk output is reduced. Losses are documented at 38.5% for primiparous cows, where RP is more prevalent (source). This impacts both the amount and quality of milk, as stressed cows produce milk with reduced fat content—which is concerning given the U.S. trend toward increasing milk fat percentages, projected to reach 4.29% by April 2024. The financial implications of this issue cannot be overstated, making it a top priority for dairy farmers.

Long-term health issues exacerbate these expenditures. Cows with RP often have reproductive difficulties, including reduced conception and more excellent culling rates. The effect on fertility may account for about 28.5% of overall economic losses in multiparous cows (ResearchGate).

Managing these health difficulties entails higher feed prices, labor, and tighter health procedures. The financial impact of RP goes beyond acute treatment. Research by the University of Wisconsin found that RP may cost up to $300 per cow. These expenses include lower milk output, more outstanding vet fees, and possibly losing cows to culling. Financial losses are $350.4 per event in primiparous cows and $481.2 in multiparous cows (ResearchGate). The varied economic burden underscores the need for excellent preventive and timely treatments to preserve your cows and keep their earnings in good condition.

Understanding the Multifaceted Causes and Risk Factors Behind Retained Placentas (RP) Can Safeguard Your Dairy Operation from Significant Setbacks 

Understanding the many causes and risk factors of retained placentas (RP) may help protect your dairy company from significant setbacks. One of the leading causes is nutritional deficiency, which may impair the cow’s general health and reproductive effectiveness. Low levels of selenium and vitamin E are important risk factors. The Journal of Dairy Science states, “Nutritional imbalances, deficient levels of selenium and vitamin E, are significant risk factors for RP in dairy cattle.”

Difficult or extended calving, which often causes stress or injury to the reproductive system, might also predispose cows to RP. Research published in the Journal of Animal Reproduction found a clear link between dystocia (difficult calving) and an increased risk of retained placentas.

Infections, especially those that affect the uterine lining, are another critical factor. Metritis and endometritis might impede the placenta’s natural separation process. The Veterinary Journal reports, “Bacterial infections can significantly impair uterine function, increasing the risk of RP.”

Environmental and genetic variables both play essential roles. Stress from poor living circumstances or rapid dietary changes may impair the physiological mechanisms required for placental evacuation. Furthermore, specific genetic lines have been linked to RP, highlighting the necessity of selective breeding in minimizing this risk (source: New Zealand Veterinary Journal).

Genetic Selection: The Game-Changing Strategy Every Dairy Farmer Should Know About 

As we go further into the topic of retained placentas (RP) in dairy cows, knowing the function of genetics might give valuable insights. According to research, cows may be genetically susceptible to this illness, making it a reoccurring issue in select herds. Dairy producers may efficiently manage this issue over time by choosing genetic features that minimize the risk of RP.

Genetic selection is not new in dairy farming. Still, its application to RP provides a unique way to improve herd health and production. The USDA offers substantial materials on genetic improvement in dairy cattle, emphasizing the value of educated breeding strategies in mitigating health concerns such as RP. Farmers interested in learning more about this method should visit the USDA’s dedicated dairy cow genetic selection site, which includes thorough recommendations and research data.

Using genetic selection entails selecting and breeding cows with a reduced frequency of retained placentas, progressively lowering the prevalence of this problem across the herd. Farmers may breed more robust cows and improve herd performance by concentrating on genetic markers related to reproductive health. Taking a proactive approach to dairy operations enables long-term sustainability and profit retention.

Proactive Measures to Prevent Retained Placentas: Ensuring Long-Term Profitability and Productivity in Your Dairy Operation 

Preventing retained placentas is more than simply addressing acute health concerns; it is also about safeguarding your dairy operation’s long-term profitability and productivity. Here are some evidence-based strategies to help you reduce the incidence of retained placentas (RP) in your herd: 

  • Dietary Recommendations
  • A well-balanced diet is vital for avoiding RP. Ensuring proper micronutrient intake is critical. For example, selenium is essential for uterine health. According to the National Animal Health Monitoring System, maintaining appropriate selenium intake may cut the number of retained placentas by up to 50%. Ensuring your cows have enough vitamin E may help boost their immune system and reproductive health.
  • Proper Calving Management
  • Effective calving management requires thorough monitoring of cows throughout the peripartum period. Proper hygiene and stress reduction are essential. According to a paper published in the Journal of Veterinary Medicine, reducing stress during calving, providing a clean and pleasant birthing environment, and assuring the presence of experienced attendants may dramatically reduce the chance of RP. Prompt intervention during protracted or complex labor is critical to avoiding problems that might result in retained placentas.
  • Timely Veterinary Interventions
  • A strong connection with your veterinarian may be a game changer. Regular health screenings and prompt actions may help to identify possible problems before they become serious. According to the Journal of Dairy Science, instituting a systematic reproductive health monitoring program may detect at-risk cows and allow for preventative interventions, such as prostaglandins, to help placental evacuation.

Integrating these preventive techniques may significantly minimize the incidence of RP, leading to improved herd health and optimum milk production. Remember, proactive management improves animal welfare while protecting your dairy’s profitability.

Treatment Options for Retained Placentas: What Every Dairy Farmer Needs to Know! 

Treatment OptionProsCons
Manual RemovalImmediate relief for the cowCan prevent secondary infectionsRisk of uterine damageStressful for the cowRequires skilled personnel
Antibiotic TherapyPrevents infectionsWidely available and relatively inexpensiveOveruse can lead to antibiotic resistanceDoes not address the root causePotential residue issues in milk
Oxytocin InjectionsStimulates uterine contractionsNon-invasiveNeeds to be administered within a short time frame postpartumVariable efficacy
Herbal RemediesNatural alternativeLow risk of side effectsLack of scientific validationVariable effectiveness
Supportive Care (Nutrition and Hydration)Boosts overall cow healthReduces stressEasy to implementDoes not directly remove the placentaMay require additional interventions

When dealing with retained placentas in dairy cows, it is critical to understand the available treatment options, including physical removal, hormonal therapies, and antibiotics. Each approach has advantages and disadvantages, and your decision should be based on evidence-based advice to guarantee your herd’s health and production.

Manual Removal: This approach entails physically retrieving the cow’s retained placenta. While it may be feasible, substantial concerns include harm to the cow’s reproductive system and increased infection risk. Research published in the Journal of Dairy Science suggests that only a professional veterinarian should remove manually to minimize dangers. The technique may be unpleasant for both the cow and the operator, and it fails to address any underlying concerns that may have contributed to the retention in the first place.

Hormonal Treatments: Retained placentas may be expelled with hormonal therapy like oxytocin or prostaglandin. Oxytocin is very intriguing. According to the Veterinary Record, oxytocin may increase uterine contractions and help in evacuation. The disadvantage of hormone therapies is that they may not function if infections or other problems cause the retention, and repeated dosages might result in decreasing returns in efficacy.

Antibiotics: Antibiotics may be given systemically or locally when there is a significant risk of infection or pre-existing illnesses. While this approach may help avoid serious diseases like metritis, it does not address mechanical placental removal. According to research published in Animal Reproduction Science, antibiotics may be an effective adjuvant. Still, they should not be used as the only treatment strategy. Over-reliance on antibiotics may also contribute to resistance difficulties, which is unfavorable in the present regulatory climate aimed at minimizing antibiotic use in cattle.

Recent research has examined nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory medicines (NSAIDs) to decrease inflammation and enhance outcomes in dairy cows with retained placentas. These developments, supported by clinical research, can significantly improve your herd’s health and productivity. To delve further into this topic, check out a detailed study on NSAIDs and their promising results here.

A combined approach is often the most successful. Oxytocin may assist the cow in naturally discharging the placenta, and antibiotics can be given to avoid infection. Manual removal should be regarded as a last choice and carried out by a professional. Always consult your veterinarian to create a thorough strategy suited to your herd’s requirements.

Real-Life Success Stories: How Dairy Farmers are Winning the Battle Against Retained Placentas 

Real-life examples from dairy farmers worldwide demonstrate the necessity of proactively managing and reducing retained placentas. For example, John from Wisconsin has a recurring problem with retained placentas in his herd. John worked with his veterinarian to develop a well-balanced feeding regimen with Vitamin E supplements. According to recent research, Vitamin E significantly lowers the prevalence of retained fetal membranes. Within six months, John saw a dramatic decline in RP instances, which resulted in healthier animals and increased milk output.

In another situation, Maria in California addressed the issue by implementing a thorough health monitoring system. She discovered and handled possible risks by regularly monitoring her cows’ health and breeding habits. This method, frequent vet check-ups, and judicious feed modifications reduced the RP incidence rate while improving her herd’s overall reproductive performance. According to research conducted in Isfahan province, a continuous monitoring methodology may significantly reduce RP incidences.

Tom, a dairy farmer in New York, improved his breeding program to reduce twinning, a risk factor for RP. Numerous studies have shown that twinning increases the risk of RP. Tom’s farm experienced a significant drop in RP instances after employing selective breeding procedures and modern reproductive technology, resulting in improved milk output and fertility rates.

FAQ: Addressing Common Questions and Concerns About Retained Placentas 

What are the signs of a retained placenta in dairy cows? 

Retained placentas are usually seen when a cow has not vomited the afterbirth within 24 hours after calving. Symptoms include:

  • Foul-smelling discharge.
  • A visible membrane protruding from the vulva.
  • A loss of appetite or decreased milk supply.

If you see these indicators, you must act quickly.

When should I call a vet? 

Contact a veterinarian if the cow has not discharged the placenta within 24 hours. Delaying veterinary assistance might result in serious problems, such as uterine infections or other systemic health concerns, affecting the cow’s well-being and your operation’s bottom line.

What are the potential long-term effects on cow health and productivity? 

Retained placentas may have long-term effects on a cow’s health, such as recurrent uterine infections, decreased fertility, and longer calving intervals. These difficulties may result in higher veterinary bills and poorer overall output, reducing the profitability of your dairy farm.

Can I prevent retained placentas? 

Preventive measures include maintaining appropriate nutrition, assuring good calving management, and addressing genetic selection for reproductive health features. Regular veterinarian examinations and proactive health management methods may significantly lower the danger.

Is there a role for supplements in preventing retained placentas? 

Yes, providing your cows with a proper supply of vitamins and minerals might be advantageous. Vitamin E and selenium, for example, have been demonstrated to lower the risk of retained fetal membranes. Consult your veterinarian to create a customized supplementing strategy for your herd.

The Bottom Line

Finally, keeping a close check on retained placentas in your dairy herd is more than simply keeping your cows well; it’s a smart business choice that may significantly impact your dairy’s profitability. Understanding the many reasons and adopting proactive efforts to avoid and cure retained placentas helps your herd’s long-term health and production. Collaboration with your veterinarian is essential for tailoring these techniques successfully to your unique business since untreated retained placentas may result in significant financial losses, averaging $350.4 per occurrence in primiparous cows and $481.2 in multiparous cows. Consult with your veterinarian, keep educated, and constantly adapt to new studies and best practices—addressing retained placentas is not just a question of immediate health advantages but also a sound economic strategy for sustaining the life and sustainability of your dairy operation. For information on optimal nutrition and successful dairy management, visit The Bullvine.

Learn more: 

Categories : Management
Tags : , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Global Dairy Cattle Diseases Cost $65 Billion Annually: India, US, and China Hit Hardest

Friday, June 14th, 2024

Learn how dairy cattle diseases cost the world $65 billion every year. Which countries suffer the most and why? Uncover the detailed findings now.

The 340 cows at Philipsen Farms dairy near Lacombe, Alta., are milked three times a day. All are registered Holsteins.

With yearly losses at a staggering $65 billion, dairy cow illnesses are not just a local concern but a global economic crisis. The impact is felt in every corner of the world, from India to the United States to China and beyond. These losses disrupt milk production, lower fertility, and directly affect the livelihoods of countless farmers. This is not just a statistic but a pressing issue that demands immediate attention.

Though these costs vary greatly worldwide, “the total annual global losses due to dairy cattle diseases are greatest in India, the US, and China.”

Investigate the financial ruin dairy cow illnesses like mastitis, ketosis, and lameness cause. This study provides a thorough worldwide view and uncovers why specific ailments are more expensive than others.

The Hidden Costs of Dairy Cattle Diseases: An In-Depth Global Economic Analysis

Under the direction of Philip Rasmussen of the University of Copenhagen, a team of researchers has conducted a thorough and innovative study reported in the Journal of Dairy Science that offers a comprehensive worldwide economic evaluation of dairy cow illnesses. Examining statistics from more than 180 milk-producing nations, the research painstakingly examines the financial impact of 12 major dairy cow illnesses and health issues. The researchers not only precisely calculated the worldwide losses using a comorbidity-adjusted technique but also guaranteed that any overlaps in illness effects were considered, hence providing a more accurate estimate. This thorough investigation emphasizes the global broad and different economic load dairy cow illnesses cause.

Twelve major dairy cow diseases, including mastitis (subclinical and clinical), lameness, paratuberculosis, displaced abomasum, dystocia, metritis, milk fever, ovarian cysts, retained placenta, and ketosis (clinical and subclinical), were investigated economically. These illnesses raise culling rates, affect milk output, and change reproductive rates. Precise approximations of their effects enable improved control and lower financial losses.

With a comorbidity-adjusted economic analysis, the researchers painstakingly calculated the cost of dairy cow illnesses. They considered characteristics like milk output, fertility, and culling rates, and compiled data on twelve illnesses from literature covering over 180 milk-producing countries. They standardized these measures for consistent comparability across research to guarantee dependability. This rigorous methodology ensures the accuracy and reliability of our findings.

They then combined these datasets into thorough estimations using sophisticated meta-analysis methods ranging from basic averaging to complicated random-effects models. Correcting for comorbidities was essential to avoid overestimation and to recognize the concurrent incidence of many illnesses with their combined financial consequences.

Equipped with these consistent projections, the group modeled the financial influence using Monte Carlo simulations. They precisely estimated the economic losses by including country-specific data on illness incidence, lactational prevalence, herd features, and economic criteria.

This study depends on adjusting for comorbidities to guarantee that overlapping health problems do not distort the economic effects of different illnesses. Dairy cow infections often coexist and cause combined health problems that distort statistics. Considering these comorbidities helped researchers to estimate the cost more precisely. Without this change, 45% of the worldwide losses would have been exaggerated, distorting the actual economic weight of the dairy sector. This change offers a more accurate knowledge of the financial effects related to illnesses of dairy cattle.

Dairy Cattle Diseases: A $65 Billion Annual Burden with Subclinical Ketosis and Mastitis Leading the Costs

According to an extensive analysis of dairy cow illnesses, yearly worldwide losses amount to US$65 billion. Most importantly, subclinical ketosis, clinical mastitis, and subclinical mastitis surfaced as the most expensive causes of mean annual worldwide losses, ranging from US$18 billion to US$13 billion and US$9 billion, respectively.

DiseaseGlobal Losses (US$ Billion)India (US$ Billion)US (US$ Billion)China (US$ Billion)
Subclinical Ketosis183.62.41.5
Clinical Mastitis132.61.81.1
Subclinical Mastitis91.81.20.75
Clinical Ketosis0.20.040.030.02
Displaced Abomasum0.60.120.080.05
Dystocia0.60.120.080.05
Lameness61.20.80.5
Metritis510.670.42
Milk Fever0.60.120.080.05
Ovarian Cysts40.80.530.32
Paratuberculosis40.80.530.32
Retained Placenta30.60.40.25

In China, the United States, and India, dairy cow illnesses have a negative economic influence. With $12 billion yearly losses, India’s dairy industry’s great size emphasizes the necessity of improved disease control, and the country suffers the most. Veterinary expenses, decreased milk output, and early culling cause the United States to lose $8 billion annually. With China’s industrial-scale dairy production and rising demand for dairy products, its $5 billion losses reflect its industrial nature.

The financial burden of these losses is defined by various measures. When viewed as a proportion of GDP, India’s agricultural economy bears the brunt, highlighting the need for tailored disease control plans. Analyzing losses per capita or as a proportion of overall milk income offers another perspective. The high dairy output quantities underscore the potential for significant financial losses even with a low frequency of illness. This underscores the necessity of customized disease control plans, designed to fit the unique architecture and economic situation of each nation’s dairy sector.

The Bottom Line

This study emphasizes the important role that legislators, scientists, and dairy industry stakeholders play globally. With nearly half of these costs ascribed to subclinical ketosis, clinical mastitis, and subclinical mastitis, it exposes the shockingly high financial cost of dairy cow diseases—$65 billion yearly. The research shows how urgently policies and focused treatments are needed. Countries with the most losses—China, the US, and India—have to lead in putting sensible disease management strategies into effect. Best agricultural techniques, better veterinary care, and strong monitoring systems may help to greatly reduce these losses. All those involved must recognize and solve these financial challenges, thereby guaranteeing the viability of the worldwide dairy sector.

Key Takeaways:

  • Global dairy cattle diseases lead to annual financial losses of approximately US$65 billion, affecting milk yield, fertility, and culling rates.
  • The most significant losses are observed in India (US$12 billion), the US (US$8 billion), and China (US$5 billion).
  • Subclinical ketosis, clinical mastitis, and subclinical mastitis were identified as the costliest diseases, with annual global losses of US$18 billion, US$13 billion, and US$9 billion, respectively.
  • When adjusting for comorbidities, the overestimation of aggregate global losses is reduced by 45%, highlighting the importance of considering disease interactions.
  • Disease-specific losses include lameness (US$6 billion), metritis (US$5 billion), ovarian cysts (US$4 billion), paratuberculosis (US$4 billion), and retained placenta (US$3 billion).
  • The relative economic burden of dairy cattle diseases varies significantly across countries, dependent on metrics such as GDP, per capita losses, and gross milk revenue.
  • Effective and customized disease control plans are essential to mitigate these substantial economic impacts.

Summary: Dairy cow diseases, causing $65 billion in yearly losses, are a global economic crisis affecting milk production, fertility, and farmers’ livelihoods. The largest losses are in India, the US, and China. A study by Philip Rasmussen of the University of Copenhagen evaluated the financial impact of 12 major dairy cow diseases, including mastitis, lameness, paratuberculosis, displaced abomasum, dystocia, metritis, milk fever, ovarian cysts, retained placenta, and ketosis. These diseases increase culling rates, affect milk output, and change reproductive rates. India’s dairy industry suffers the most, with $12 billion yearly losses. The US loses $8 billion annually due to veterinary expenses, decreased milk output, and early culling. China’s industrial-scale dairy production and rising demand result in $5 billion losses. Customized disease control plans are necessary to address these losses.

Categories : Management
Tags : , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Tags

A.I. Industry animal welfare butter prices challenges China cow health Dairy Cattle Dairy Cattle Marketing dairy cows dairy farmers Dairy Farming dairy farms Dairy Industry dairy market trends dairy producers dairy production efficiency farmers Feed Costs Feed Efficiency Genetic Evaluation System Genomics greenhouse gas emissions growth Health Herd Health innovation Management milk output milk prices Milk Production milk quality milk yield monitoring New Zealand nutrition production productivity Profitability resilience sustainability Technology United States USDA World Dairy Expo

Style_Bullvine
Style_Bullvine
Style_Bullvine
Slide 5
Slide 5
Slide 5
Slide 8
Slide 8
Slide 8
Slide 5
Slide 5
Slide 5
Slide 7
Slide 7
Slide 7
Overlays

Send this to a friend