Archive for crops

How to Spot and Stop Fall Armyworms Before They Devour Your Crops

Learn how to identify and control fall armyworms before they devastate your crops. Discover effective scouting tips and treatment strategies to protect your fields.

Invasive pests, such as fall armyworms, travel northward as temperatures increase and persist year-round in warmer southern American environments. Their thirty-day life cycle consists of egg, larva, pupa, and adult moth. The larvae do the most significant harm, eating crops like maize, alfalfa, pasture grasses, rye, wheat, and triticale.

“Fall armyworms can decimate entire fields in days,” Iowa State University Field Agronomist Virgil Schmitt stresses. Early identification and quick response are thus very vital in controlling these pests.

Being proactive and in control is critical in the face of fall armyworms. Early identification and swift management are essential, as these pests can rapidly turn fields to stubs if not managed promptly.

Fall Armyworms: A Global Agricultural Threat of Significant Proportions 

The famously flexible fall armyworms, Spodoptera frugiperda, pose a significant global agricultural danger. Their ability to seriously jeopardize world food security and ruin many crops was initially documented in West and Central Africa in 2016.

Understanding the life cycle of the fall armyworm is crucial. It includes four phases: egg, larva, pupa, and adult moth. The larval stage is the most devastating, as the larvae ravenously eat leaves, stalks, and flowers. They even move and spread via silk threads, causing severe damage to crops.

Rising temperatures let these pests exist year-round in the southern United States, but once spring approaches, they travel north. Experts Casey Reynolds, Mike Merchant, and Diane Silcox Reynolds say they finish their life cycle every 30 days and create many generations yearly. This fast life cycle emphasizes how urgently early diagnosis and control are needed.

Susceptible Crops and Agronomic Factors Contributing to Armyworm Infestations

Because their soft leaves provide perfect nourishment for the larvae, fall armyworms attack crops like maize, alfalfa, pasture grasses, rye, wheat, and triticale. Late planting, less tillage, and utilizing non-Bt hybrids without lepidopteran control all increase susceptibility. As breeding grounds, spring cover crops may cause infestations in other areas after harvest.

Scouting for Armyworms: Optimal Timing and Identification Tips 

Scouting for armyworms is a crucial task that requires vigilance and attention to detail. Emphasizing the best periods, like dawn or sunset, when fall armyworms are most active and evident on the vegetation can help with identification and management.

Armyworms hide in the whorl of a corn stalk or curl up in the debris at the base of the plant during the day. Examine closely the lowest sections of the plants and plant trash. Ignoring these warning signals may cause a full-fledged epidemic.

Search for larvae whose heads show an inverted “Y” to set fall armyworms apart from other pests. Usually green, brown, or black, these insects have smooth bodies and lengthy “i” stripes down their sides. Accurate scouting and suitable pest control depend on awareness of these traits, which will arm you in your efforts.

Being alert in your scouting can help significantly lessen the damage autumn armyworms do to your crops. Apply these guidelines to keep a field in an excellent and productive state.

Preventive Strategies: Safeguarding Your Crops from Fall Armyworms 

Preventive actions are essential for protecting crops against fall armyworms. Crop rotation, which provides a regular food supply, might disturb their life cycle and lower their number. Additionally, integrated pest management (IPM), which includes introducing armyworm natural predators, strengthens defenses. Healthy soil supports vigorous plants that better fight pests. Amendments to organic matter and soil may help increase water retention, fertility, and soil structure.

Healthy soil supports vigorous plants that better fight pests. Amendments to organic matter and soil may help increase water retention, fertility, and soil structure. Additionally, integrated pest management (IPM), which includes introducing armyworm natural predators, strengthens defenses.

Though they must be used wisely, cover crops may help control pests. Before starting major crops, terminate cover crops to prevent providing an armyworm home—for instance, an infestation results from planting maize onto a rye cover crop without adequately tending it.

These steps can help significantly lower the fall armyworm risk in your farming operations and support agricultural sustainability.

Effective Foliar Insecticide Use and Integrated Pest Management Strategies for Fall Armyworms 

Fighting fall armyworm infestations usually starts with foliar pesticides. They provide rapid control when applied to crop leaves where the larvae feed. Success depends on using application rules.

Timing is critical. Targeting larvae less than ¾ inch in size is both economical and successful. More giant larvae cease eating near pupation and are more difficult to kill. Early action with appropriate pesticides lessens crop damage.

Following pre-harvest intervals (PHI) on labels is very essential. PHI ensures customer safety and crop acceptability by indicating the days between the last treatment and harvest, preventing unlawful pesticide residues.

Furthermore, integrated pest management (IPM) should be used. Combining resistant cultivars, crop rotation, chemical treatments, and biological controls helps reduce resistance and encourages sustainable farming.

Effective autumn armyworm control depends on proactive monitoring and quick responses safeguarding food security and crop productivity.

The Economic Imperative of Early Fall Armyworm Intervention 

Fall armyworms have a significant economic influence as they can quickly destroy vast tracts of priceless crops. These infestations not only lower yields but also raise control-measure-related expenditures. Iowa State University Field Agronomist Virgil Schmitt believes early intervention is economically vital. Tiny larvae, usually 3/4-inch or less, are more sensitive to pesticides, so early treatment is economical and successful.

This technique depends heavily on timely scouting. Early detection of fall armyworm larvae enables quick response that helps to avoid significant damage, which requires more forceful and costly solutions. Scouting during ideal periods, like dawn or sunset, improves the management of infestations before they spread, reducing crop loss and safeguarding agricultural output.

Early diagnosis and treatment provide financial advantages beyond short-term cost reductions. Maintaining good crops helps prevent the broader consequences of lower yields, which can affect supply networks, market pricing, and world food security. Integrated pest control plans aimed at safeguarding agricultural investments and economic stability depend critically on the cost-effectiveness of early intervention.

Prompt treatment and attentive scouting help support the long-term viability of agricultural activities and help lower the financial effects of autumn armyworm damage. Prevention is worth a pound of cure.

The Bottom Line

Fall armyworms seriously threaten crops throughout the United States, particularly in the southern states, where they flourish year-round and travel north as temperatures increase. Consuming foods like maize, alfalfa, and cereals, the most damaging larvae eat also.

Armyworms are nocturnal and more challenging to find during the day; hence, proactive scouting during twilight hours is rather important. Although foliar pesticides might be helpful, timely treatment is essential in small larvae cases.

Preventive actions and combined pest control plans are essential. Early intervention lessens economic losses and helps maintain agricultural production.

Regular scouting, quick treatment, and thorough pest control help protect crops against autumn armyworm infestations, guaranteeing robust agricultural methods and safe food output.

Key Takeaways:

  • Fall armyworms can survive year-round in southern U.S. climates and migrate northward as temperatures rise.
  • They complete their life cycle every 30 days, with the larval stage being the most destructive.
  • Commonly affected crops include corn, alfalfa, pasture grasses, rye, wheat, and triticale.
  • Spring cover crops are a significant habitat for armyworms, which can infest subsequent crops or nearby fields once harvested.
  • Scouting should be done at sunrise or sunset when armyworms are most active, using tips from agronomy experts to differentiate them from other pests.
  • Corn crops in the southern U.S. and Texas, particularly late-planted or non-Bt hybrids, are at higher risk.
  • Prompt treatment with labeled foliar insecticides is crucial when scouting thresholds indicate the necessity.
  • Smaller larvae (3/4-inch or less) are easier to eliminate and should be targeted for the best economic sense.
  • Killing frost can naturally destroy the armyworm population.

Summary:

Fall armyworms are invasive pests that cause significant damage to crops like maize, alfalfa, pasture grasses, rye, wheat, and triticale in warmer southern American environments. They can decimate entire fields in days and are primarily found in West and Central Africa. Factors contributing to fall armyworm infestations include late planting, less tillage, and using non-Bt hybrids without lepidopteran control. Identifying and managing fall armyworms is crucial, especially during ideal periods like dawn or sunset. Preventive strategies include crop rotation, integrated pest management (IPM), healthy soil, and amendments to organic matter and soil. Pre-harvest intervals (PHI) on labels are essential for customer safety and crop acceptability. Effective autumn armyworm control relies on proactive monitoring and quick responses to safeguard food security and crop productivity. Early intervention is economically vital as fall armyworms can quickly destroy vast tracts of crops, lowering yields and increasing control-measure-related expenditures. Prompt treatment and attentive scouting support the long-term viability of agricultural activities and help lower the financial effects of autumn armyworm damage.

Learn more:

Double Disaster: Iowa Farms Hit Hard by Flooding and H5N1 Outbreak

Iowa farms face double trouble with severe flooding and an H5N1 outbreak. How are farmers coping with these challenges? Discover the impact and ongoing efforts.

Iowa crops are severely disrupted by extreme floods and an epidemic of Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza (H5N1). Along with operational difficulties, these twin crises have caused significant damage to crops and animal losses. Attempts to limit H5N1 and urgent rescue and disaster response activities are underway.

“In the face of these devastating floods, the people of Iowa have shown remarkable resilience. They were flown out of the flooded areas and literally rescued off rooftops,” Iowa Secretary of Agriculture Mike Naig stated, emphasizing the strength and determination of the community.

Rivers cresting and flooding still present make it unknown how much damage has been done. Dairy and poultry farmers also address H5N1 infections, increasing their burden.

Catastrophic Rainfall and Coordinated Rescues Mark Iowa’s Weekend Disasters 

“Parts of northwest Iowa were severely flooded over the weekend with more than 15 inches of rain. This flood forced rivers to spill over and bury houses, requiring a quick and coordinated response. Thousands of people were evacuated using dramatic rescues involving airlifting people from roofs. The efficient and timely deployment of emergency services and cooperation with local authorities played a crucial role in managing this natural catastrophe,” the report highlighted, reassuring the public of the effective disaster response.

Official Statements Highlight Extreme Conditions and Coordinated Relief Efforts

Official Transcripts: Mike Naig, Iowa Secretary of Agriculture, underlined the severe circumstances in the state and stressed the need for quick rescues resulting from the increasing floods and heavy rain. He saw significant damage to utilities, livestock facilities, equipment, and agricultural infrastructure. In talks with Naig, Iowa Governor Kim Reynolds declared a catastrophe and detailed the damage as widespread. Both authorities underlined that only until the floods recede will a complete evaluation of agricultural and animal damage be feasible. They cooperate to lessen and handle continuous destruction.

Relentless Flooding Deepens Agricultural Turmoil: Equipment Damage, Infrastructure Failures, and Ongoing Uncertainties Plague Iowa Farmers

The recent terrible floods have made life more difficult for Iowa’s farmers. Farmers now deal with broken machinery and unworkable roads, which affect important feed supplies and necessary services to cattle farms. Outages of power and water exacerbate the problem and complicate attempts to keep enterprises and cattle intact.

Because of continuous flooding, state authorities still cannot thoroughly evaluate agricultural damage. This delay strains farmers and makes it difficult to assess their losses and decide on recovery plans, affecting current and long-term agrarian policies.

H5N1 Outbreak Intensifies Crisis for Iowa Dairy and Poultry Sectors Amid Severe Flooding

Iowa’s dairy and poultry industries, already struggling with extreme floods, have been much taxed by the H5N1 pandemic. Transmitted mainly by migratory wild birds, Iowa has verified H5N1 outbreaks in eleven dairies and three poultry operations, complicating control attempts.

Farmers have been careful to test and document incidents, which allows quick action to stop the spread. The state works with USDA strike teams to track the spread and enhance biosecurity policies, therefore supporting present containment and future readiness.

Compounded Challenges: Floods and H5N1 Create Existential Crisis for Iowa Dairy Producers 

One cannot emphasize the combined stress dairy farmers in northwest Iowa experience. These farmers deal with the terrible consequences of unheard-of floods and the widespread Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza (H5N1). Every difficulty by itself would be intolerable; for many of the local producers, taken together, they constitute an existential crisis.

Attempts to Control Illnesses Among Natural DisasterWhile attending to the terrible effects of the floods, farmers and state authorities are working nonstop to control the illness. Active steps are being taken to test for H5N1 and stop its spread despite washed-out roads and power shortages. The Iowa dairy sector has shown extraordinary awareness. Early reporting of any positive cases by producers helps USDA epidemiological strike teams quickly identify sources of transmission.

Variance in Symptoms and ResultsIn infected animals, H5N1’s symptoms and effects have shown significant variation. While some farms have little disturbance in milk output, others have severe illnesses with significant milk losses and even animal deaths. This discrepancy accentuates the necessity of ongoing study and customized biosecurity policies, complicating an already terrible situation.

Federal aid becomes very vital as farmers negotiate these escalating challenges. Stabilizing the region’s agriculture during these volatile times depends on ensuring compensation for killed animals and supporting research into H5N1 behavior.

State and Federal Agencies Rally to Combat Dual Crisis of Flooding and H5N1 Outbreak 

State and federal authorities are mobilizing resources to address the H5N1 epidemic. Under direction from Agriculture Secretary Mike Naig, state authorities are collaborating with the USDA to implement epidemiological strike squads. These teams examine how H5N1 spreads throughout farms to create biosecurity strategies to stop further infections.

Secretary Naig also advocates USDA payment for farmers who have lost livestock to the epidemic. Naig stated, “We are still working on it; we keep making that request since we are seeing some losses.” This payback will help Iowa’s dairy and poultry industries recover from disease and floods.

The Bottom Line

Iowa’s agriculture industry is in trouble due to severe floods and the H5N1 epidemic. Further testing dairy and poultry producers are agricultural equipment damage, interruptions in cattle feed, and continuous power outages. Strong biosecurity policies are desperately needed as the ongoing need to monitor and control H5N1 has impacted milk output and resulted in some livestock mortality. Notwithstanding these challenges, Iowa’s farming population exhibits impressive fortitude. To learn about H5N1 transmission, farmers and state authorities are working with federal agencies and doing thorough testing. Their prompt case reporting and pursuit of USDA funding demonstrate their commitment to protecting cattle and livelihoods. Iowa’s flexibility in tragedy is shown by its double approach of quick reaction and long-term plan.

Key Takeaways:

  • Over 15 inches of rain caused severe flooding in northwest Iowa, leading to rooftop rescues and significant agricultural damage.
  • Iowa Gov. Kim Reynolds issued a disaster proclamation, and thousands of residents were evacuated.
  • Floodwaters have not yet receded, so the full extent of crop and livestock damage remains unclear.
  • Flooding has intensified pre-existing challenges for dairy producers already dealing with H5N1 outbreaks.
  • Iowa has reported H5N1 in 11 dairies and 3 poultry sites, with further testing and monitoring ongoing.
  • H5N1 has led to varied impacts, including significant milk production losses and some cattle mortality due to secondary infections.
  • The Iowa dairy industry is proactive in reporting H5N1 cases to enable timely interventions by USDA epidemiological teams.
  • State and federal agencies are focused on biosecurity strategies to combat H5N1’s spread and learning from current outbreaks.
  • Authorities continue to request USDA compensation for livestock losses due to H5N1 to support affected producers.
  • H5N1 is a dual threat to dairy and poultry sectors, requiring comprehensive livestock industry strategies for mitigation.

Summary:

Iowa’s agriculture industry is facing severe disruptions due to extreme floods and an H5N1 epidemic. The floods have caused significant damage to crops and animal losses, and efforts are underway to limit H5N1 and implement urgent rescue and disaster response activities. The people of Iowa have shown remarkable resilience, with thousands evacuated using dramatic rescues involving airlifting people from rooftops. The recent floods have made life more difficult for farmers, who now deal with broken machinery and unworkable roads, affecting important feed supplies and services to cattle farms. State authorities cannot thoroughly evaluate agricultural damage due to continuous flooding, straining farmers and making it difficult to assess their losses and decide on recovery plans. The H5N1 outbreak intensifies the crisis for Iowa’s dairy and poultry sectors, already struggling with extreme floods. State and federal authorities are mobilizing resources to address the dual crisis of flooding and H5N1 outbreak. Agriculture Secretary Mike Naig is directing state authorities to collaborate with the USDA to implement epidemiological strike squads and advocate USDA payment for farmers who have lost livestock to the epidemic.

Learn more: 

Major Updates in the 2024 House Farm Bill: What Farmers Need to Know

Discover the key changes in the 2024 House Farm Bill. How will updates to reference prices, base acres, and federal programs impact your farming operations? Find out now.

The House Agriculture Committee recently approved the 2024 Farm Bill, bringing significant changes to production agriculture. This bill covers important areas such as reference prices, base acres, and federal programs, aiming to meet the evolving needs of farmers. In this article, we’ll break down these changes and explain how they could impact your farming operations, giving you the insights you need to stay ahead.

Significant Boost in Reference Prices Brings Both Opportunity and Cost 

CropProposed Increase (%)
Legumes~19%
Peanuts17.8%
Cotton14.4%
Wheat15.5%
Soybeans18.5%

The proposed increases in reference prices for various crops are significant. Legumes will see a 19% rise, and peanutswill get a 17.8% bump. Cotton follows with a 14.4% increase, while wheat and soybeans will jump by 15.5% and 18.5%, respectively. Though these changes promise better financial security for farmers, they also bring a hefty cost. It’s estimated this could increase the farm bill’s cost by $15 to $20 billion over a decade. Adjustments might be made to balance the budget if needed.

A Golden Opportunity to Adjust Your Base Acres

The base acres update is particularly beneficial. If you’ve planted more acres than your base acres from 2019 to 2023, you can now permanently increase your base acres to match that excess. This is a one-time opportunity. 

For instance, if you usually grow corn and soybeans but only planted corn in the last five years, you can now increase your base acres for corn. This could lead to higher subsidies or benefits for your corn production. 

Another advantage is the inclusion of non-covered commodities like potatoes or onions. You can now use up to 15% of your farm acres for these crops, adding more flexibility to your operations. 

Importantly, the House proposal does not restrict who qualifies for this program, making it accessible to more farmers without extra hurdles.

Enhanced Safety Net: Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program Receives Key Updates 

The Agriculture Risk Coverage (ARC) program has some noteworthy updates that could affect your farm. The benchmark revenue guarantee jumps from 86% to 90%, and the maximum payment cap rises from 10% to 12.5%.  

This means you’ll have a broader and deeper safety net. If your revenue falls short, the increased coverage and higher payment rate can offer better financial protection during tough years. 

Keep in mind, while these changes enhance ARC’s benefits, they might also come with increased federal program costs. It’s essential to weigh these enhanced benefits against your farm’s financial plans and risk management strategies.

Marketing Loans: A Double-Edged Sword for Farmers

Marketing loans are set to increase by about 10% in the new bill. This offers both pros and cons. On the positive side, getting a loan becomes easier, providing more financial flexibility. You can borrow more against your crops, which can be a big help in tough times. 

However, there’s a catch. The higher loan rate could lower your Price Loss Coverage (PLC) payments. PLC payments hinge on the gap between the effective reference price and the market year average (MYA) price. Since the MYA price can’t drop below the loan rate, this change might reduce the financial benefits you expect from PLC payments.

Boosted Support for Livestock Programs: Enhanced Dairy Margin and Indemnity Payments

The 2024 Farm Bill introduces significant updates for livestock programs, crucially affecting both the dairy margin program and livestock indemnity payments

In the dairy margin program, the subsidy for tier one coverage now extends from 5 million pounds to 6 million pounds, a 20% increase. This boost provides extra financial relief for dairy farmers, helping them manage milk prices and feed costs. 

For livestock indemnity payments, the compensation rate has increased to up to 100% for animals killed by federally protected species, like wolves. Additionally, if a pregnant animal is harmed, the owner can receive up to 85% of the value of the unborn animal’s lowest weight class. 

These changes underscore the Farm Bill’s commitment to supporting farmers and ranchers in managing the risks of agricultural production.

Major Shift for Farm Partnerships: Proposed Rule Change Could Unlock Multiple Payment Opportunities

Under the new House farm bill, partnerships like LLCs and S corporations could see big changes. Traditionally, these entities were limited to one payment. The new proposal aims to remove this cap for qualified pass-through entities. This means many farming operations structured as LLCs, S corporations, general partnerships, or joint ventures could benefit from multiple payments. 

However, C corporations would still be subject to the one-payment limit. Because of this, some agricultural entities might consider restructuring to maximize their benefits. While the final decision is pending, this change could offer significant financial and strategic advantages for many farming operations.

Expanded Farm Income Definition: Embracing Diversification and Innovation

The House proposal expands the definition of farm income, making it more inclusive and adaptable for today’s farmers. Now, gains from trading farm equipment, such as old tractors and machinery, are recognized as farm income. 

Plus, if you offer agritourism activities like hayrides, farm tours, or pumpkin patches, the income from these will be counted as farm income too. This is great news for those who have diversified their revenue streams

The new definition also includes direct-to-consumer sales. So, if you’re selling produce, meats, or other products directly through farmers’ markets, roadside stands, or online, this income is also now classified as farm income. 

These changes provide a more accurate picture of your farm’s total income and encourage innovation and diversification. It’s a boost that supports your financial stability and resilience. 

In sum, this updated definition helps you better manage and report your income, leading to a stronger, more flexible agricultural sector.

Substantial CRP Payment Increase: A Win-Win for Farmers and the Environment

The 2024 Farm Bill draft proposes a significant hike in the maximum Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) payment, boosting it from $50,000 to $125,000. This increase offers greater financial incentives for farmers with less suitable land for cultivation. 

Higher payment limits mean more acres can join conservation efforts, benefiting both the environment and farmers. With this boost, making decisions about reallocating underproductive land becomes easier. Whether enhancing wildlife habitats or reducing soil erosion, the increase makes land preservation financially appealing. 

For those with less productive land, this change is an economic win. It allows income from land that may not be yield-worthy through traditional farming, balancing economic viability with environmental responsibility.

Significant Updates in Supplemental Crop Insurance Policies: A Game-Changer for Farmers 

The latest Farm Bill brings noteworthy updates to supplemental crop insurance, promising significant advantages for your farming operations. The cap on revenue protection policies is now increased, allowing up to 90% coverage for individual yield or revenue. This higher cap spans multiple commodities, giving you more comprehensive protection. 

In addition, the Supplemental Coverage Option (SCO) jumps from 86% to 90%. This is especially beneficial for states like North Dakota, Texas, Oklahoma, and southern Missouri, where crop insurance costs are high. The increased subsidy can ease your financial load and improve risk management. 

There’s also good news for beginning or veteran farmers: a 10-percentage point subsidy increase now extends from five to ten years, giving you more time to stabilize and grow your farm. 

Overall, these changes offer a better safety net against unpredictable market and environmental conditions, helping you secure your farming future.

The Bottom Line

The proposed changes in the 2024 House Farm Bill could significantly impact production agriculture. While increased reference prices might boost farmers’ income security, they come with potential budgetary constraints. Updating base acres and broader program qualifications aim to make farming more flexible and inclusive. 

Enhanced protections through the Agricultural Risk Coverage program and marketing loans offer a stronger safety net but come with trade-offs. Livestock programs receive substantial support adjustments, and the expanded definition of farm income and shifts for partnerships open new financial avenues. Conservation efforts benefit from increased CRP payments, and supplemental crop insurance updates provide relief for high-cost areas. 

In essence, these changes aim to create a more resilient and adaptable agricultural sector. By enhancing financial safety nets, improving flexibility in farm management, and increasing support across various aspects of farming, these updates present both opportunities and challenges. Staying informed and proactive will help farmers navigate and leverage these advancements.

Key Takeaways:

  • Proposed increase in reference prices for various crops could lead to higher farm bill costs, potentially between $15 billion to $20 billion over a decade.
  • Farmers can adjust base acres based on average plantings from 2019 to 2023, benefiting those who have planted more acres than they currently have as base acres.
  • ARC program guarantees and maximum payments are set to increase, enhancing the safety net for farmers.
  • Marketing loans are projected to rise by about 10%, although this may reduce PLC payments due to higher market loan rates.
  • Livestock programs, including the dairy margin program and livestock indemnity payments, are receiving increased support and subsidies.
  • New rule changes for farm partnerships may allow multiple payments, benefiting pass-through entities like LLCs and S corporations.
  • The definition of farm income is expanded to include trading gains on farm equipment, agritourism, and direct-to-consumer marketing.
  • CRP payment caps are more than doubled, encouraging enrollment of acres that should not be farmed.
  • Supplemental crop insurance policies receive significant updates, including increased caps on revenue protection and expanded subsidy periods for beginning and veteran farmers.

Summary: The House Agriculture Committee has approved the 2024 Farm Bill, which includes changes to production agriculture, reference prices, base acres, and federal programs. The bill aims to meet farmers’ evolving needs by increasing reference prices for crops like legumes, peanuts, cotton, wheat, and soybeans. It also introduces updates for livestock programs, such as a 20% increase in the dairy margin program and a compensation rate for animals killed by federally protected species. The bill also expands the definition of farm income, increases the cap on revenue protection policies, and extends the subsidy period. These changes aim to create a more resilient and adaptable agricultural sector.

Send this to a friend