Image
FacebookEmailTwitterRSS

Slide 5
Slide 5
Slide 5
Style_Bullvine
Style_Bullvine
Style_Bullvine
Slide 7
Slide 7
Slide 7
Slide 8
Slide 8
Slide 8
Slide 5
Slide 5
Slide 5
Overlays

Archive for COVID-19 pandemic

Will Favorable Margins Propel U.S. Milk Production to New Heights?

Wednesday, August 7th, 2024

Can U.S. dairy farmers beat the odds and ramp up milk production? Dive into the latest trends, margins, and expert advice shaping American dairy’s future.

Summary: The USDA’s recent report reveals a 1% drop in U.S. milk production for June, with only the Upper Midwest showing growth. Despite improved on-farm margins suggesting potential for increased production, experts like Jon Spainhour highlight challenges such as high cattle prices and environmental factors. Colin Kadis points out opportunities for growth due to the relaxation of base programs from the COVID-19 era. However, rising costs in building and cow prices present serious obstacles, complicating the path to boosting milk output. Improved margins, expected to remain above $12 per hundredweight, face threats from economic and environmental challenges, highlighting the industry’s complexities in navigating a tricky landscape compared to global players like New Zealand and India.

  • Recent USDA report shows a 1% decline in U.S. milk production for June, with growth only in the Upper Midwest.
  • On-farm margins are improving, surpassing the $12 per hundredweight mark, up from a break-even point of $9 to $10.
  • High cattle prices, low replacement inventories, and environmental challenges may limit potential milk production growth.
  • Relaxation of COVID-19 era base programs creates new opportunities for dairy farming expansion.
  • Rising building costs and cow prices are significant obstacles for farmers aiming to increase milk output.
  • The industry’s complexities are heightened by economic and environmental factors, posing a challenge to U.S. dairy farmers.

U.S. milk output decreased by 1% in June despite improved on-farm margins. That’s correct; although you’d anticipate higher profit margins to increase production, the reality is significantly more complicated. Suppose you’re curious about why and what it means for the future of dairy farming in America; you’ve come to the perfect spot. Let’s examine the key parameters influencing milk production and determine whether a potential increase may be realized. Historical patterns indicate that strong margins should lead to greater milk output, but present difficulties such as high cow costs and heat waves impede expansion. This is more than an industry update; it may greatly influence dairy farmers’ lives throughout the country. Keep reading to learn more.

Surprising Trends in the USDA Milk Production Report: What Dairy Farmers Need to Know

RegionMilk Production Change (June Year-over-Year)
Upper Midwest+0.5%
Northeast-1.2%
Southeast-1.5%
Southwest-0.8%
West-1.3%

The USDA Milk Production report provides an overview of the U.S. dairy business. It reported a 1% reduction in milk yield in June compared to the previous year. This dip may not seem substantial initially, but even a tiny decrease may be significant for dairy farmers operating on razor-thin profits. Interestingly, the Upper Midwest was the only area to deviate from this tendency, seeing growth despite the general decline. This geographical variation shows the industry’s complicated dynamics, in which localized circumstances and agricultural techniques may considerably influence output results. Understanding these subtleties highlights American dairy producers’ problems and possibilities today.

Let’s Talk About On-Farm Margins: What They Mean for Dairy Farmers 

MonthDairy Margin ($ per hundredweight)
January 202411.50
February 202411.75
March 202412.00
April 202412.25
May 202412.50
June 202412.75

Now, let us discuss on-farm margins. Simply put, on-farm margins differ between a farmer’s earnings from milk sales and the cost of producing that milk. These margins have recently improved and are essential to dairy producers’ long-term viability and profitability.

According to Erica Maedke, Managing Director of Ever.Ag Insights, on their “Parlor to Plate” podcast, the Dairy Margin Coverage program’s margins surpassed the $11 mark in February. Surprisingly, these margins have steadily increased and will likely remain well over $12 per hundredweight for the foreseeable future. This is noteworthy because, for many dairy producers, a $9 to $10 margin often represents the break-even point—the barrier required to pay production expenses without suffering losses.

Due to enhanced margins, dairy producers will benefit from more stability and maybe higher profits. Farmers may better manage their operations, reinvest in their fields, and expand to improve production capacity when margins are enormous. It denotes a buffer against the volatility that often characterizes agricultural markets, offering farmers more excellent breathing space and confidence in their economic prospects. This financial buffer is critical as companies face increased expenditures in other sectors, such as high cattle prices and rising construction costs.

Is the Road to Increased Milk Production as Smooth as It Seems? 

MonthClass III Milk Price ($/cwt)Class IV Milk Price ($/cwt)
January 202422.5021.80
February 202422.7022.00
March 202423.0022.30
April 202423.1022.40
May 202423.2522.60
June 202423.3522.75

First, The data provide a positive image of the possibility of the development of milk production. Improved margins have always been a solid incentive for dairy producers to increase production. “Decent margins on the spot basis and a nice margin moving out on the Class III and Class IV curve compared to feed prices would, historically, be an incentive to make milk,” remarked Jon Spainhour, a veteran dairy dealer. This kind of financial climate usually supports investment in milk production, maintaining a consistent supply to satisfy rising demand.

However, converting this theoretical potential into actual development is complex. While more robust financial data may pique interest, specific external considerations must be overlooked. For example, low replacement inventories make it challenging to increase operations fast. High cattle prices hinder efforts since farmers must evaluate the considerable financial expenditure necessary to grow their herds.

Beyond the immediate economic problems, environmental circumstances offer significant threats. Heat waves may significantly influence dairy cows’ health and output. At the same time, although avian influenza predominantly affects poultry, it is part of a more significant disease control and biosecurity concern that may indirectly impact the dairy industry. Spainhour recognizes this complicated reality, adding that although the long-term setting may favor increasing milk production, near-term problems may severely limit this expansion.

Looking Further Down the Road: The Landscape for Milk Production is on the Cusp of Significant Changes 

Looking forward, the milk production environment looks about to shift dramatically. Despite existing obstacles like high feed prices and changing profits, the sector is primed for significant development, which may transform dairy farming in the United States and Europe. Jon Spainhour, a seasoned dairy dealer, predicts an increase in milk output. This confidence is not unjustified; historical statistics show that favorable margins fuel output growth.

Spainhour’s findings highlight an important point: despite obstacles such as heat waves and animal illnesses that temporarily strain output levels, the structural setup is promising. Dairy producers have negotiated numerous cycles of market pressures over the years, but the underlying foundation that supports milk production remains strong. When margins increase, as they are now, it creates an environment where growth is both conceivable and likely.

As we negotiate these changing environments, one thing becomes clear: patience and careful preparation will be required. There is potential for higher milk output, but dairy producers will need cautious risk management and some innovation. Spainhour’s analysis provides a realistic yet positive perspective, urging us to monitor local and global changes.

Where Does U.S. Milk Production Stand in the Global Dairy Arena? 

To put things in perspective, consider how US milk output compares to that of other major dairy producers worldwide. Dairy producers in New Zealand, the Netherlands, and India have distinct problems and benefits, providing valuable insights for U.S. farmers to explore.

New Zealand, often considered a dairy powerhouse, relies primarily on pasture-based systems, which reduce input costs. However, since pastures are used so extensively, weather conditions may significantly impact yield. Despite these weaknesses, New Zealand maintains a strong export market, while the Netherlands has intensive dairy production techniques. The Netherlands has among the world’s most excellent milk production per cow, thanks to innovative technology and excellent farm management methods.

Compared to these nations, American dairy producers operate in a more varied and industrialized environment. The United States has ample geographical resources and excellent technology infrastructure, which provide prospects for scalability and efficiency. However, like those in the Netherlands, American farmers face increased environmental challenges and rising expenses. While the United States relies less on exports than New Zealand, global market forces continue to impact local policy and profit margins. Understanding these international environments reveals competitive pressures and offers insights into prospective strategic changes.

The Decade of Change: Reflecting on the Shifts in U.S. Milk Production 

YearU.S. Milk Production (Billion Pounds)
2019218.4
2020223.1
2021226.3
2022227.9
2023226.0
2024 (Projected)228.5

To comprehend the present state of milk production in the United States, it is necessary to go back and consider the historical backdrop. Over the last decade, the dairy sector has faced economic and environmental problems that have greatly influenced its current position. For example, in the early 2010s, the dairy industry expanded rapidly, spurred by increased worldwide demand. The dairy industry in the United States reacted by increasing output via agricultural technologies and genetic advances. However, external issues such as shifting milk costs, trade disputes, and swings in consumer preferences for plant-based alternatives quickly hampered this expansion phase.

Fast forward a few years, and the COVID-19 epidemic has added another layer of complication. Initial lockdowns lowered demand in the food service industry, resulting in a temporary glut of milk, forcing some farmers to abandon their goods. The crisis forced dairy enterprises towards direct-to-consumer sales and local supply networks. Understanding these historical tendencies gives us significant insight into the dairy industry’s resiliency and adaptation in the United States.

While current measurements may indicate growth potential, the preceding decade’s experiences highlight the need for cautious optimism. The economic roller coaster did not end there. The mid-2010s saw a worldwide milk oversupply, resulting in falling prices and forcing many producers to the edge of financial ruin. USDA statistics show milk prices in 2016 were among the lowest in recent history. The historical background reminds us that the milk production equation always involves economic and environmental issues.

Navigating a Labyrinth of Challenges and Opportunities in the Dairy Industry

Colin Kadis provides a nuanced view of the current difficulties and prospects in the dairy sector. He remembers a period of great pessimism and overstock in the dairy industry a few years ago, accentuated by the COVID-19 outbreak. Base initiatives implemented during this period seemed to practically bar new entrants, making it almost hard for them to begin dairy farming. However, Kadis observes that the environment has changed; several basic programs have collapsed or eased, opening up a window of opportunity for those wishing to extend their activities.

But growth is not without its challenges. Kadis identifies several large cost increases that might serve as significant impediments. Building costs, for example, have often doubled, requiring farmers to take on far more debt to maintain the same output level as a few years earlier. Furthermore, cow prices have skyrocketed, and the supply of replacement animals is critically short. These characteristics, together, provide a challenging environment for expansion despite the better margins that would generally favor it.

According to Kadis, although underestimating the American dairyman’s potential to produce more milk is risky, the route to higher milk production is complex. This complicated combination of possibilities and difficulties shows that, although growth potential exists, the road will be more complex than current margins would imply.

The Bottom Line

As previously discussed, the most recent USDA Milk Production report depicts a confusing picture for dairy producers in the United States. While milk production fell 1% in June, there is cautious optimism about growing on-farm margins, which have cleared the $11 mark and are expected to continue rising. However, the optimistic hypothesis that higher margins would boost milk output confronts several real-world challenges, including inadequate replacement inventories, high cow prices, climatic effects, and avian influenza. However, considerable obstacles persist, notably growing expenses and the residual consequences of previous economic instability. Despite these challenges, there remains hope for growth, particularly with the relaxation of severe base programs implemented during the COVID-19 epidemic. The path ahead is everything but straightforward. While American dairy producers’ tenacity should not be underestimated, the path to greater milk output will undoubtedly be challenging. As you examine the future, remember that dairy farmers’ capacity to adapt and prosper in the face of hardship will be critical in creating the next chapter of milk production in the United States.

Learn more: 

Categories : Dairy Markets
Tags : , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

U.S. Milk Powder Prices Skyrocket: What Every Dairy Farmer Needs to Know

Wednesday, July 31st, 2024

Uncover the reasons behind the shocking rise in U.S. milk powder prices and its impact on your farm’s bottom line. Our expert analysis and data reveal what you need to know.

Summary: The US powdered milk price has surged, surpassing rates in Europe and New Zealand. This is mainly due to supply chain disruptions, competitive foreign markets, and rising manufacturing costs. The US has the highest global milk powder costs due to persistent demand and limited supply, affecting export markets and domestic consumption patterns. American dairy producers must know the economic ripple effects, as premium pricing may affect export feasibility and domestic consumer preferences. Supply chain disruptions, particularly transportation and port congestion, have hampered commodity transit, increasing retail prices. The COVID-19 pandemic has further exacerbated supply chain issues, causing delays and increased costs at all levels of dairy product distribution. Dairy producers face rising feed costs and manpower shortages, while international demand for US dairy goods has increased.

  • U.S. milk powder prices are currently the highest globally, causing significant financial strain on dairy farmers.
  • Disruptions in the global supply chain have exacerbated cost increases, making operational budgeting more complex.
  • The historical volatility of U.S. milk powder markets adds a layer of unpredictability that complicates long-term planning.
  • High milk powder prices in the U.S. put local dairy farmers at a disadvantage compared to global competitors.
  • Economic forecasts suggest potential stability in the future, but short-term challenges persist, requiring strategic planning and adaptability.

The price of powdered milk in the United States has skyrocketed, making it the most costly in the world, far exceeding rates in Europe, New Zealand, and other major dairy-producing nations. According to Mark Stephenson, Director of Dairy Policy Analysis at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, “The U.S. powder prices being at a premium to the rest of the world is unusual and certainly something that needs a closer look.” It is urgent to understand pricing dynamics, ranging from rising production costs to global demand swings and trade policy effects. This insight is beneficial and crucial to making more educated judgments and safeguarding your business.

U.S. Powder Prices Soar: Why Your Dairy Farm Costs Are Skyrocketing 

The current status of the milk powder business in the United States is both troubling and exciting for our local producers. Recent statistics suggest a considerable increase in nonfat dry milk pricing. According to USDA data, the price of nonfat dry milk in the United States has risen to $1.24 per pound, far more than the worldwide average of $1.00 per pound and well ahead of New Zealand’s $1.14 and the EU price of $1.15. This significant price discrepancy is primarily the result of supply chain interruptions, competitive foreign marketplaces, and growing manufacturing costs.

Milk powder costs in the United States have risen to the highest globally due to persistent demand and limited supply. Consequently, American milk powder costs have surpassed overseas rivals’ costs, increasing pressure on export markets and altering domestic consumption patterns. To navigate these higher prices, American dairy producers must be thoroughly aware of the more significant economic ripple effects. With worldwide prices averaging roughly $1.00 per pound, premium pricing in the United States may influence everything from export feasibility to domestic consumer preferences. As our industry faces these difficulties, keeping current with credible information and data from reliable sources will be critical to retaining a competitive edge in this dynamic market.

Supply Chain Disruptions Wreak Havoc on Dairy Industry: Here’s Why Your Costs Are Spiraling

Supply chain interruptions are among the most significant causes of rising milk powder costs in the United States. Over the last year, logistical constraints, especially those connected to transportation and port congestion, have significantly hampered the timely transit of commodities. As containers lie idle or suffer delays, the cost of delivering dairy goods has risen, pinching margins and increasing retail prices.

  • Supply Chain Disruptions: The COVID-19 epidemic has compounded the worldwide supply chain problem, resulting in significant delays and increased costs at all levels of dairy product distribution. This cumulative effect has especially strongly influenced milk powder, often transported via complicated, multi-modal routes.
  • Increased Production Costs: Dairy producers are dealing with soaring production costs. Rising feed costs and manpower shortages have considerably increased production costs, increasing prices. Feed costs have increased due to various variables, including bad weather conditions reducing crop yields and rising raw material prices such as maize and soybeans.
  • International Demand: Strong overseas demand is another crucial reason driving price increases. Global demand for U.S. dairy goods, notably milk powder, has increased as economies recover and consumer preferences evolve. The United States remains a key supplier to many nations with limited dairy production capability, increasing pressure on local pricing. This rising demand from overseas consumes most of the U.S. supply, incentivizing higher price structures to balance local requirements with lucrative export potential.

These linked supply chain disruptions, higher production costs, and rising foreign demand create a problematic environment for dairy producers in the United States. While the market’s complexity necessitates adaptive solutions and solid economic knowledge, present trends indicate that high milk powder costs will likely prevail shortly. Adaptability and innovation are crucial in finding solutions to these challenges.

Unpredictable Price Swings: The Volatile History of U.S. Milk Powder Markets

The historical backdrop of milk powder pricing in the United States depicts a market marked by cyclical variations and sensitivity to local and foreign forces. Historically, nonfat dry milk (NFDM) prices have fluctuated significantly. According to USDA statistics from 2008, NFDM prices rose to a high of $1.96 per pound owing to strong export demand and limited supply. However, by 2009, prices had fallen to about $0.85 per pound due to the global financial crisis and an overstock problem.

Prices rose again between 2014 and 2015, hitting about $1.65 per pound due to strong foreign demand and decreasing manufacturing costs. In recent years, prices fell again in 2018, averaging roughly $0.70 per pound, as global milk output surpassed demand.

U.S. milk powder costs have increased dramatically again, hitting an average of $1.25 per pound in 2022, making them among the world’s most expensive (CLAL Dairy Data). This increase is consistent with previous instances of tight supply and high demand. Nonetheless, it is now heavily influenced by pandemic-induced supply chain disruptions and geopolitical conflicts, putting an unprecedented financial burden on American dairy producers.

The Surge in Milk Powder Prices: Financial Strain and Operational Challenges for American Dairy Farmers 

The rise in milk powder costs has substantially strained American dairy farmers, with many facing an increased financial burden and operational issues. As the price of feed, labor, and other vital inputs rises, farmers are finding it more challenging to remain profitable. For the average dairy producer, this means a significant reduction in their profit margins and potentially even operating at a loss.

This compression on margins is most seen in the experiences of real-life farmers. Dairy farmers are battling the persistent rise of input prices, making it more difficult to remain viable. The continual increase in expenses adds to the strain on farmers struggling to balance their books amid unprecedented economic pressures.

Furthermore, operational issues are exacerbating the situation. Many farmers face unpleasant options, such as culling less productive livestock or deferring maintenance and infrastructure improvements. For instance, a farmer might choose between investing in new equipment to improve efficiency or using that money to cover the increased feed cost. Although vital for short-term survival, these actions might have long-term consequences for the viability of their operations.

The rising price of milk powder is significantly impacting dairy producers. They were already operating on thin margins, and this additional expenditure jeopardized their survival. According to the USDA’s National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS), the average milk powder price in the United States has risen by more than 20% in the past year alone. This increase makes U.S. powder costs the highest globally, causing a ripple effect affecting all dairy farming operations.

In light of these issues, industry experts urge more robust support mechanisms from state and federal governments to assist dairy farmers in weathering the storm. Rising prices might force many farmers out of business without substantial action, jeopardizing the whole supply chain. If this trend continues, it could significantly reduce the number of dairy farms in the United States, potentially decreasing domestic production and increasing reliance on imports.

Global Price Comparisons Highlight Why U.S. Dairy Farmers Are Facing Unfair Competition

The discrepancies become instantly apparent when comparing milk powder pricing in other major dairy-producing countries. According to the Global Dairy Trade, the cost of milk powder in New Zealand has been reasonably consistent at about $0.95 per pound. This consistency may be linked to New Zealand’s excellent production infrastructure and ideal environment for dairy farming.

In contrast, according to Food and Agriculture Organization statistics, milk powder costs in the European Union are cheaper than in the United States, averaging roughly $1.15 per pound. The E.U. benefits from significant government subsidies and robust infrastructure, which helps to keep manufacturing costs low.

Meanwhile, the price in Argentina stays at $0.80 per pound. Argentina’s reduced cost structure stems mainly from lower labor costs and less strict regulatory frameworks for dairy production.

Pricing disparities may be linked to various reasons, including labor costs, regulatory regimes, and manufacturing efficiency. Consequently, U.S. dairy producers confront stiffer competition worldwide, and pricing disparities exacerbate financial constraints on sustaining viable operations. Addressing these difficulties requires a multifaceted strategy that maximizes efficiency while seeking favorable regulatory or subsidy frameworks.

The Path Forward for U.S. Milk Powder Prices: Navigating a Complex and Uncertain Future

The future direction of milk powder costs in the United States is complicated and unclear. Given the existing business dynamics, some industry observers are cautiously optimistic about the future, albeit considerable hurdles still exist. Dairy Herd Management predicts milk powder costs will rise further if supply chain problems and worldwide competition continue. One significant projection predicts that prices will reach $1.30 per pound by the end of the year.

Market Trends and Economic Forecast

The continuing fluctuations in global milk demand are crucial in determining future price swings. Emerging countries, notably in Asia, are seeing strong consumer growth, which may raise prices. Furthermore, the ongoing logistical problems and growing raw material prices lead to an increasingly uncertain pricing environment. The interplay between global demand and local supply chain inefficiencies will likely keep U.S. milk powder prices elevated soon.

Furthermore, any changes in trade rules or taxes influence prices. For example, trade tensions between the United States and critical exporting nations could worsen. In that case, American dairy producers may face more intense competition and increased expenses. Trade negotiations will be vital. A good trade deal may give much-needed relief to American dairy producers. Conversely, any obstacles may increase the industry’s existing financial burden.

Expert Predictions and Possible Scenarios.

Industry insiders suggest a variety of scenarios for the future price trajectory of milk powder. Some experts foresee a stabilizing phase if supply chain difficulties are resolved and global output increases. More pessimistic predictions, on the other hand, imply that ongoing interruptions, along with increased operating expenses, may result in more price increases. Given the available data, a modest but credible projection is that prices will hover between $1.20 and $1.30 per pound over the next several months.

Overall, the picture is mixed, with potentially significant long-term prospects offset by current problems and uncertainty. Dairy producers must remain aware and adaptable in this volatile market climate. Farmers may make more strategic choices to reduce risks and capitalize on new opportunities by staying current on market trends and expert views.

Future Gazing: Dairy Experts Predict Price Stability Amid Persistent Short-Term Challenges

Industry analysts predict various milk powder costs in the following months and years. According to the USDA’s Agricultural Projections to 2031, long-term milk powder costs are expected to stabilize as supply chain concerns resolve and world output levels out. However, prices are projected to stay high in the medium term due to persistent logistical constraints and ongoing geopolitical concerns hindering international trade flows. (source: USDA Agricultural Projections)

The National Milk Producers Federation predicts a mixed prognosis for milk powder pricing. According to their most recent study, although increased production may provide short-price relief as supply chains adjust, the underlying trend points to long-term pressure from growing input prices and regulatory changes. A representative for NMPF said: “We are seeing a market that is trying to balance between the highs of global demand and the lows of disrupted supply, which creates a highly volatile pricing environment.” This mood reflects the overall uncertainty that dairy producers are now facing.

Furthermore, the Overseas Dairy Federation’s global dairy market analysis indicates that overseas producers’ competitive pressures may complicate the price picture. As developing nations increase their dairy production capacity, American dairy producers must adapt to a more competitive global market. The need for strategic planning and cost management has never been higher, emphasizing the significance of being informed and adaptive in this uncertain industry.

The Bottom Line

The soaring costs of U.S. milk powder are putting an exceptional financial strain on American dairy farmers, exacerbated by complicated supply chain disruptions, the ripple effects of global market changes, and unrelenting operational hurdles. The increasing expenditures connected with milk powder raise day-to-day operating expenses and jeopardize long-term planning and investment objectives. Addressing these structural issues is critical to sustaining the lives of American dairy farmers and ensuring a robust agriculture business. As we look forward, the need for strategic interventions becomes clearer, whether lobbying for legislative reforms, investing in technical advancements, or encouraging multinational partnerships to level the playing field.

Learn more:

Categories : Dairy Markets
Tags : , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Why Dairy Prices Haven’t Soared Post-COVID Despite Rising Costs

Sunday, July 21st, 2024

Find out why dairy prices have stayed low after COVID even though costs are rising. Wondering what keeps dairy prices affordable while other food prices go up? Read on.

The COVID-19 epidemic has altered sectors, raising commodity prices, including beef and tomatoes. Despite this tendency, dairy prices have stayed relatively steady despite rising production costs for milk and cheese. Why aren’t dairy commodity prices growing at pace with rising costs? This is critical for dairy producers since it directly affects their livelihoods. Significant disruptions, such as labor shortages, increasing transportation costs, and rising feed prices, reduce profit margins. Consumer demand has moved, and supply chains continue to recover. While many industries have witnessed rising consumer costs, dairy remains an exception. This oddity deserves study because of its economic ramifications and potential to change dairy production. Why hasn’t the dairy sector seen similar price increases? This issue is critical to the sustainability and future of dairy production.

The Untold Struggles: Navigating the COVID-19 Turmoil in the Dairy Sector 

The COVID-19 epidemic brought about unprecedented challenges for the dairy sector, distinct from those faced by other industries. The closure of restaurants, schools, and food service businesses disrupted established supply networks, leaving farmers with excess production and decreased demand. Gallons of milk were wasted as processing factories experienced delays and logistical challenges. Labor shortages exacerbated the sector, as many workers were sick or had to be quarantined, lowering the labor required to manage herds and everyday operations.

Consumer demand fluctuated unexpectedly. Initial panic buying depleted grocery shelves of dairy goods, but unpredictable purchase habits quickly followed. Home consumption of milk, cheese, and butter increased, but overall unpredictability hampered forecasting and supply chain management.

Despite these challenges, the dairy sector has shown extraordinary resiliency. Farmers and processors reduced output levels, strengthened health procedures, and investigated direct-to-consumer sales methods. However, the pandemic revealed supply chain weaknesses, emphasizing the need for adaptive and resilient systems in the face of future disruptions.

Divergent Paths: Why Dairy Prices Remained Stable Compared to Meat and Produce 

Many significant aspects appear when analyzing price patterns of commodities such as meat and tomatoes with those of dairy products. The meat and vegetable industries encountered severe supply chain issues during and after COVID-19, such as labor shortages, transportation interruptions, and processing facility closures. These challenges caused bottlenecks, sometimes wholly stopping production, and the labor-intensive nature of these businesses meant that increasing costs translated straight into higher pricing.

Market demand factors also impacted these patterns. Perishable products such as meat and tomatoes saw higher availability changes, resulting in price volatility. On the other hand, dairy products provided a buffer against unexpected interruptions, maintaining prices despite growing input costs, thanks to their extended shelf life. Furthermore, constant domestic consumption rates of dairy products, particularly in the year’s second half, have contributed to stable demand and pricing.

Furthermore, the economic structure of dairy farming is distinct from that of meat production. Dairy producers often sign long-term contracts with processors and retailers, which include price stability provisions to counteract short-term market swings. This contrasts with the more volatile meat and vegetable markets, where acute supply and demand mismatches considerably impact pricing.

These essential distinctions explain why dairy prices have remained steady despite considerable economic changes and rising expenses.

The Safety Net: Government Interventions as Stabilizing Forces in the Dairy Sector 

When evaluating dairy price stability in the face of growing input costs and economic pressures, the importance of government intervention must be addressed. Government subsidies and assistance programs were critical during and after the epidemic, protecting farmers and consumers from the unpredictable price changes observed in other commodities. These solutions often involve direct financial assistance, minimum price support, and purchasing programs to help balance supply and demand. Export activities have also reduced surplus local supply, limiting sharp price decreases. The deliberate dairy product purchases by the government have also helped stabilize market prices, demonstrating the successful use of policy measures to assist the agriculture sector and guarantee that basic nutrition requirements are satisfied without putting excessive financial hardship on consumers.

Federal initiatives such as Dairy Margin Coverage (DMC) provide a financial safety net when the difference between milk prices and feed costs is unprofitable. During the pandemic, supplemental help, such as the Coronavirus Food Assistance Programme (CFAP), ensured that dairy producers got critical financial assistance. These measures preserved dairy farmers’ incomes while ensuring consumer access to moderately priced dairy products.

The government’s deliberate dairy product purchases have also helped stabilize market prices. Large amounts of dairy goods were purchased and redistributed via food aid programs, eliminating excess from the market and ensuring steady pricing. Export aid has further protected the dairy sector from COVID-19-related economic problems.

In essence, these government actions have been critical in preserving the equilibrium of the dairy market, allowing dairy commodity prices to remain steady while other food costs skyrocket. This stability demonstrates the successful use of policy measures to assist the agriculture sector and guarantee that basic nutrition requirements are satisfied without putting excessive financial hardship on consumers.

Tech-Driven Stability: How Innovations Are Reshaping Modern Dairy Farming 

The dairy farming scene has changed dramatically due to ongoing technical improvements, critical in stabilizing dairy pricing in the face of rising input costs after COVID. Automated milking systems significantly increased operational efficiency, allowing farmers to handle more enormous herds with fewer personnel while lowering labor expenses.

Advances in feed technology enable more effective nutrient consumption, improving dairy cow health and output. Precision agricultural technology, such as sensors and GPS-guided equipment, improves water and fertilizer management while decreasing waste and expenses. Selective breeding produces cows with improved milk output and illness tolerance.

Energy-efficient methods and renewable energy sources, such as biogas and solar panels, help minimize energy expenditures while contributing to environmental sustainability. These technical developments provide a buffer, allowing dairy producers to withstand financial shocks without passing prices to consumers. These improvements assist in alleviating financial constraints on dairy producers, ensuring relative price stability even as other commodity prices rise.

Market Dynamics and Consumer Behavior: The Unique Resilience of Dairy Prices 

Market dynamics and customer behavior have been critical in understanding why dairy prices have remained consistent compared to other commodities such as meat and tomatoes.

Many things contribute to this:

  • First, customer preferences for milk, cheese, and butter have remained consistent. These home staples continue to be in high demand even during economic downturns. This constancy contrasts strongly with the volatile market for meat and tomatoes, driven by dietary trends and seasonal availability.
  • Inflation has risen by 3.7% since September (Bureau of Labor Statistics), prompting people to prioritize critical products. Dairy products, essential to diets, have maintained their position in shopping carts, keeping demand and pricing stable. In the face of economic challenges, this consumer behavior has been a significant factor in the dairy sector’s resilience. The dairy industry also benefits from stabilizing influences, such as government initiatives and technical improvements, which mitigate the effect of rising input prices. In contrast, the meat and vegetable markets are more volatile, with interruptions caused by cattle illnesses or low harvests.
  • Investigations into supermarket price fixing, which resulted in significant penalties, have shown practices that impact commodity pricing. Perishable items such as tomatoes and meat, which lack the regulatory frameworks of dairy, are severely affected.

In conclusion, despite rising input prices, customer devotion to dairy and robust market stability mechanisms have guaranteed dairy products’ distinctive pricing resilience.

Global Trade and Dairy: Navigating the Intricacies of an Interconnected Market 

Global commerce and export markets are essential in stabilizing dairy prices, which are impacted by international trade rules and competition. Tariffs and trade agreements directly influence dairy exports. Protectionist policies, although intended to safeguard home manufacturers, might result in retaliatory tariffs from trade partners, restricting export potential. For example, conflicts between the United States and significant dairy importers might hinder access to vital markets, boosting domestic supply and lowering prices.

Global rivalry also influences market dynamics. Major dairy exporters such as New Zealand and the European Union established global pricing standards. Their higher productivity and cheaper costs give them a competitive edge, challenging the profitability of US dairy goods in overseas markets. As a result, US manufacturers must innovate to stay cost-effective and appealing to international consumers.

Fluctuating global demand brings both risks and possibilities. Economic downturns in important importing nations may diminish global dairy demand, lowering prices. On the other hand, rising wealth in developing economies can increase demand and provide development prospects. The supply chain’s capacity to adjust to these changes may stabilize or destabilize dairy prices.

Currency exchange rates can have a significant impact. A high US currency makes American dairy goods more costly abroad, lowering competitiveness. At the same time, a weaker dollar might boost export appeal while increasing input costs for farmers who depend on imports.

Combining global trade rules, competition, demand variations, and currency values creates both hazards and possibilities. Dairy farmers and producers must manage these complications to keep prices stable, illustrating the complexity of the global dairy system.

The Bottom Line

The stability of dairy costs under COVID contrasts dramatically with the significant increases in meat and tomatoes. Government action, technical improvements, consumer behavior, and global commerce contributed to this stability. Government safety nets mitigated shocks, while technical advancements increased efficiency. Consumers’ need for value sustained demand, but international commerce helped the industry weather economic crises. The dairy business must embrace innovation and sustainability to reduce future instability. The resilience of dairy farmers will be critical in managing future uncertainty and sustaining the sector’s profitability.

Key Takeaways:

  • Input Costs vs. Retail Prices: Despite the increased input costs for dairy farmers, retail prices for dairy products have not seen a commensurate rise.
  • Government Interventions: Government policies and subsidies have played a critical role in stabilizing dairy prices, providing a buffer against market volatility.
  • Technological Advancements: Innovations in dairy farming have enhanced efficiency and productivity, mitigating some of the pressures from rising input costs.
  • Consumer Behavior: Consistent consumer demand for dairy products has helped maintain price stability, unlike the more volatile demand patterns seen in meat and produce markets.
  • Global Trade Dynamics: The interconnected nature of the global dairy market has also contributed to the relatively stable pricing, balancing supply and demand more effectively.

Summary:

The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly impacted the dairy sector, leading to increased commodity prices and supply chain disruptions. These include labor shortages, transportation costs, and rising feed prices, which reduce profit margins. Despite these challenges, dairy prices have remained relatively stable compared to meat and produce. The pandemic caused the closure of restaurants, schools, and food service businesses, disrupting supply networks and leaving farmers with excess production and decreased demand. Processing factories experienced delays and logistical challenges, while labor shortages exacerbated the sector. Despite initial panic buying and unpredictable purchase habits, the dairy sector has shown extraordinary resilience, with farmers and processors reducing output levels, strengthening health procedures, and investigating direct-to-consumer sales methods. Dairy prices remain stable compared to meat and produce due to factors such as extended shelf life, distinct economic structure, government interventions, and technological advancements.

Learn more:

Categories : Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza
Tags : , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Post-Covid Grocery Price Surge: How It Affects Dairy Farmers and Your Wallet

Friday, July 19th, 2024

Find out how higher grocery prices affect dairy farmers and consumers. Learn what causes these increases and how they impact your budget.

When you stroll into your local grocery shop, you may discover that the price of a can of tomatoes has risen. Grocery shopping has been a severe financial strain since the COVID pandemic, with basics such as meat and dairy goods increasing in price. This price increase impacts everyone, making it difficult to manage family budgets and increasing financial stress.

According to statistics, grocery costs grew 4% in 2020, 6% in 2021, and 12% in 2022, resulting in a 25% increase in the food-at-home index from Q4 2019 to Q1 2023. These rises are not just numbers, they’re taking money out of people’s wallets, affecting consumers and dairy producers. It’s crucial to understand the reasons behind these increases to navigate this new economic landscape.

A Period of Stability Before the Storm 

Before the pandemic, supermarket costs had been relatively consistent for five years, making it more straightforward for customers to budget and producers, especially dairy farmers, to arrange their budgets. This predictability meant less unexpected family spending for necessities such as dairy products, cereals, and meats. However, introducing the COVID-19 epidemic altered everything, causing extraordinary volatility in supermarket costs.

A Period of Escalating Prices Amid the Pandemic

The COVID-19 epidemic has substantially influenced supermarket costs, with annual rises. Prices climbed 4% in 2020. The trend continued, with a 6% rise in 2021 and a 12% jump in 2022. From late 2019 to early 2023, the food-at-home index increased significantly by 25%. Rising prices are due to economic pressures from supply chain interruptions, increasing demand, and pandemic-related issues.

The Ripple Effect of Rising Commodity Prices 

Growing commodity prices, particularly grains, are essential when considering the rise in grocery costs. The epidemic disrupted supply systems, leading prices for wheat, maize, and soybeans to rise. Grains are vital livestock feed; increasing grain prices increased the cost of producing animals, especially those in the cattle, hog, and poultry sectors. This resulted in increased meat costs at the grocery store. The egg market was also strained, with increased poultry feed costs resulting in higher egg prices. The dairy industry also felt the effect, as cows fed pricier grains generated more expensive milk, influencing cheese, butter, and yogurt costs. These interwoven networks demonstrate how each cost adjustment impacts customers’ wallets.

Higher Labor Costs: Another Key Driver Behind the Surge in Grocery Prices 

Higher labor expenses in supermarkets have dramatically increased food prices. With the epidemic emphasizing the necessity of supermarket workers, several grocery stores increased compensation to recruit and retain employees. While helpful to workers, salary increases have contributed to the rising costs you’ve witnessed on your food bills. As supermarkets faced higher operating expenses, they passed them on to customers, impacting even daily products. This suggests increased commodity prices and salary increases increase customers’ financial burden.

These wage-related expenditures put further strain on dairy producers. As the supply chain tightens and prices rise, they must either absorb part of the increases or bargain more aggressively to retain profits. This delicate balance affects market pricing and the viability of dairy farming operations.

Debunking the Myth: Price Gouging vs. Genuine Cost Increases 

Many assume increasing supermarket costs result from price gouging, but economist Thomas Klitgaard disagrees. His analysis identifies commodities price hikes and supermarket labor expenses as the primary drivers. While prices were constant for five years before the pandemic, these variables, rather than purposeful industry activities, threw the balance off. It is critical to remember that what seems to be price gouging is the result of rising commodity and labor expenses.

The Struggles of Dairy Farmers Amid Escalating Grocery Prices 

When you think about dairy farms, you might picture tranquil pastures and happy cows. However, the reality for dairy farmers today is much more challenging due to rising grocery prices. They face numerous obstacles affecting their profitability and operations. 

Soaring Feed Costs 

The soaring price of grains like corn and soybeans has made feeding cows incredibly pricey. Inflation eats into the farmers’ margins for every dollar spent on feed, making it harder to sustain their farms. 

Rising Costs of Other Inputs 

It’s not just feed; other costs are climbing, too. Fertilizers, fuel, and electricity bills are all increasing, putting further financial strain on dairy farmers. Fertilizer prices spiked due to supply chain issues, and consistent fuel and electricity are essential but now more expensive. 

Impact on Profitability 

These rising costs squeeze profitability. Even though milk prices might increase at the store, farmers don’t always see the benefit. When overheads rise faster than milk sales income, their profits decline. 

Operational Adjustments 

Some farmers are making tough choices to cope. They might reduce herd sizes or cut back on investments in infrastructure and technology, which can lead to long-term issues like lower productivity. 

Innovations and Consumer Trends 

Amidst these challenges, some farmers are looking for innovations. Animal-free dairy products and a focus on humane and sustainable practices could help differentiate their products and boost margins. Aligning with consumer trends on environmental and ethical considerations might offer some financial relief.

Adapting to the New Normal: Navigating Grocery Price Increases 

The ongoing increase in supermarket costs has severely disadvantaged many families. You’ve seen an increase in your monthly shopping expenditure, making it more challenging to make decisions at the checkout. Food budgeting has grown more critical as necessities have gotten more expensive.

A significant trend in consumer behavior is the increased need for low-cost alternatives. Customers are turning to store brands or generic items for comparable quality at a lesser cost. To save money, you might hunt for weekly deals and discounts or use digital coupons.

Buying in quantity has also become increasingly popular. Grains, canned products, and non-perishables are bought in bulk, resulting in lower long-term costs. This maintains a consistent stockpile of necessities while conserving money.

As costs rise, some customers are changing their diets and looking for alternatives. The rising expense of meat and dairy products has prompted some to cut their intake or seek plant-based options. This change is both a cost-cutting measure and a step toward sustainable living.

Meal planning techniques have also been updated. Consumers methodically arrange their meals to reduce waste and maximize the value of each supermarket trip. Preparing meals at home instead of going out allows you to extend your food budget while promoting healthy eating habits.

While increasing food costs have put financial strain on many families, they have also encouraged a more mindful and planned approach to buying and dining. Being adaptive and resourceful may aid in navigating these transitions.

The Bottom Line

The environment of supermarket costs has evolved since COVID-19, imposing financial strain on consumers and dairy producers. Rising commodity prices, particularly grains and supermarket labor, have driven up expenses. Increased production costs have strained dairy producers’ profit margins. Minimum pricing rules provide some relief, increasing income by up to 10% in some locations.

To address these problems, marketing, and social media should be used to educate customers about the nutritional benefits of dairy products. These actions may assist in alleviating financial hardship and keep demand stable in the face of growing expenses.

As we adjust to these economic changes, remember that every link in the supply chain is important. Awareness and proactive tactics are necessary for both consumers and producers. Let us develop sustainable alternatives that benefit our wallets and local farmers.

Key Takeaways:

  • The post-Covid surge in grocery prices has dramatically impacted shoppers’ wallets and the overall cost of living.
  • From Q4 2019 to Q1 2023, there was a 25% increase in the food-at-home index, with substantial price hikes in commodities like grains.
  • Higher labor costs at supermarkets have played a significant role in the increase in grocery prices.
  • Most of the price surge is attributed to rising commodity prices and supermarket wages rather than price gouging by companies.
  • Dairy farmers face particular challenges due to increased operating costs amidst escalating grocery prices.
  • Consumers are adapting to higher grocery prices through digital promotions and social media interactions, emphasizing the need for consumer education on the nutritional value of dairy products.

Summary:

The COVID-19 pandemic has caused a 25% rise in the food-at-home index, resulting in higher grocery costs for essential items like meat and dairy goods. Commodity prices, particularly grains, have disrupted supply systems, leading to higher grain prices and increased costs of producing animals. This has resulted in increased meat costs at grocery stores and higher egg prices. The dairy industry has also experienced the effect, with cows fed pricier grains producing more expensive milk, affecting cheese, butter, and yogurt costs. Higher labor costs in supermarkets have also increased food prices, straining dairy producers. Economist Thomas Klitgaard identifies commodities price hikes and supermarket labor expenses as the primary drivers. As food budgeting becomes more critical, consumers are turning to store brands or generic items for comparable quality at a lower cost.

Learn more:

Categories : News
Tags : , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

The Ultimate Guide to Contingency Planning for Dairy Farms: Why Paranoia is Your Best Friend

Wednesday, July 10th, 2024

Is your dairy farm ready for the unexpected? Discover essential contingency planning tips to ensure your operation thrives through any crisis. Learn more now.

Imagine waking up to discover a disease spreading across your herd or a vital piece of equipment on your dairy farm that has failed. Though they don’t have to, these situations can flip your life around. This is the reason a robust contingency plan is essential. ” Everyone has a plan until they get punched in the mouth,” Mike Tyson stated. For dairy producers, such blows may represent severe storms, abrupt changes in the market, or health emergencies.

Your farm’s safety net is contingent on planning. Planning for the “what-ifs” ensures survival and potentially empowers you to thrive in the face of unforeseen challenges. The statement, “It pays to be paranoid,” is a testament to this proactive attitude. Anticipating crises ahead gives you a sense of control, helping you manage them to reduce financial loss and disturbance. Embracing this proactive approach can help you protect your livelihood and the prosperity of your dairy farm.

Navigating an Era of Uncertainty: The Imperative of Robust Contingency Plans in Dairy Farming

The dairy sector’s many difficulties emphasize the importance of solid backup plans. The COVID-19 epidemic threw off labor availability, supply chains, manufacturing, and market demand; farms had to keep running while ensuring staff health.

Changes in government policies add yet more intricacy. Changing trade agreements, agricultural policy, and environmental laws force dairy producers to react fast, influencing financial stability. These new rules might throw off corporate models, so brilliant reactions are needed to stay viable.

The H5N1 avian influenza outbreaks and Foot-and-Mouth Disease (FMD) danger highlight supply chain weaknesses. These illnesses underline the importance of preparation with movement limits, further testing, and the interconnectedness of cattle health management.

Considering these overall difficulties, thorough backup preparations are essential. They enable dairy farms to negotiate unanticipated circumstances with resilience, protecting operations against uncertainty.

Grasping the Full Spectrum of Resources: Lessons from the Field to the Farm 

During a crisis, one must know and use the resources at hand. High-stress military situations depend on fast access to information and resources, including air support and medevac facilities. This quick information flow emphasizes the need to understand all available tools.

As head of a dairy farm, maintain current with your supplies. Know where your processes and plans are, how capable your local emergency response teams are, and be aware of surrounding utility services. Like putting emergency medical supplies in key essential regions, prepositioning assets can improve your reaction time. This proactive strategy guarantees your readiness for effective crisis management.

Financial Resilience: The Pillars of Working Capital and Equity

Financial readiness, with enough accessible cash reserves and working capital, is your first line of protection in any crisis. It provides a sense of security that operations can continue even with unexpected disturbances. Keeping enough reserves to cover four to six months of running costs ensures that the money is readily available if anything happens to the primary account holder, offering a reassuring safety net.

Just as crucial is maintaining a solid financial sheet. On a market-based balance sheet, aim for a net worth of more than 50% to guarantee further funding in case of long-term difficulties. The harmony between solid equity and good operating capital will enable your business to withstand small and significant challenges.

Critical elements of a robust risk management plan include many insurance products and market price protection measures. Crop insurance, income insurance, and other coverages protect your working capital and equity. This multi-layered strategy helps stabilize your financial situation, strengthening your contingency plan.

Workforce Continuity: Jolene Brown’s Imperative for Implementing a ‘Plan B’ 

Jolene Brown emphasizes the need for having a “Plan B,” especially for employment readiness. Seamlessly transferring responsibilities may make all the difference in a crisis between continuous operations and debilitating downtime, instilling confidence. Employees must be cross-trained absolutely. If someone fails to fulfill their obligations, another may easily replace them, improving your staff’s redundancy and your confidence in your team’s preparedness.

Cross-training, however, needs to be improved. Create backup plans to manage unanticipated gaps. For instance, having bespoke operators ready for harvest or custom heifer raisers to do chores would immediately help amid labor shortages. These outside alliances guarantee constant output even with internal disturbances.

Establishing a culture wherein leaders are dedicated to teaching their successors is also vital. Good succession planning includes continuous mentoring, enabling essential staff members to acquire leadership positions. This guarantees a seamless change in case of unexpected absences and improves the competency of your staff. A good succession plan addresses leadership change and asset transfer, enabling your business to flourish even under challenging circumstances.

Addressing Leadership Voids: Comprehensive Succession Planning for Dairy Farm Resilience

The unexpected death of a principal owner is one of the most challenging obstacles a dairy farm faces. Clear management transition plans and beyond asset transfer should be part of succession planning. This guarantees constant output and morale. Clearly defining responsibilities for successors, implementing management handover procedures, and creating business continuity plans are vital. Planning for asset distribution and leadership succession helps farms maintain stability and handle challenges properly.

Conducting Scenario-Based Training: The Pillar of Crisis Preparedness 

Scenario-based training or “war gaming” greatly aids preparation for possible crises. From natural calamities like floods or tornadoes to crises like disease outbreaks or equipment breakdowns, this entails building thorough, realistic scenarios that can affect your dairy farm.

Create your leadership team to evaluate the most relevant circumstances based on probability and possible influence. For example, whereas power outages are frequent, the effects of a parlor fire—though less likely—could be significantly more catastrophic.

Once situations are recognized, create a basic, step-by-step reaction strategy. These should encompass quick actions, communication plans, financial distribution of resources, and rehabilitation techniques. Specify roles and obligations to prevent uncertainty during a natural occurrence.

Including your whole farm team, these drills will help them. This guarantees everyone understands their part and offers insightful analysis from several angles. As genuinely as possible, replicate the situation by upsetting regular operations and deploying emergency gear.

During a crisis, assign tasks linked to many purposes; rotate these responsibilities in repeated exercises to improve cross-training and guarantee redundancy—record observations on the team’s answers, timeliness, and crisis management prowess.

Following protocols:

  1. Debrief once more.
  2. Discuss what went well and point out areas needing work.
  3. Change the plans, then inform the staff about these new ideas.

Using scenario-based training and consistent use of these rules improves the resilience and preparedness of your operations. This readiness guarantees that should a true crisis arise, your farm is ready to manage it quickly and successfully, helping team members develop confidence.

Strategic Communication: Safeguarding Information Flow in Times of Crisis 

A crisis calls for good communication. A company policy guarantees constant information flow and helps to solve problems. Create backup lines of communication—like satellite phones or radios—to let everyone know should the central systems fail. Assign certain people to represent the farm to prevent contradicting claims. These contingency plans improve the farm’s resilience and guarantee a coordinated reaction during crises.

The Bottom Line

The resilience and success of your dairy farm depend on proactive contingency planning. You set your farm to withstand any storm by inventorying your resources, keeping finances solid, guaranteeing personnel continuity, creating succession plans, doing scenario-based training, and developing communication protocols. The fluid character of our sector calls for not only the development of these strategies but also their ongoing improvement and application.

Every exercise, revised plan, and team training session advances you toward mastery of unpredictability. In dairy farming, excellent preparation will help one differentiate between prospering and surviving. Thus, act right now. Examine your present contingency plans, find flaws, call on your staff, and pledge frequent drills and upgrades. The future of your farm relies on it. Investing in thorough and proactive preparation now guarantees that, should anything arise, you and your farm are ready to meet it squarely.

Key Takeaways:

  • Comprehensive Resource Inventory: Always know what equipment, protocols, and local emergency response resources are available to you.
  • Financial Preparedness: Maintain four to six months of operating expenses in accessible funds, and ensure proper account management for continuity.
  • Workforce Redundancy: Cross-train employees and have fallback options to ensure continuous operation in case of unexpected disruptions.
  • Succession Planning: Clearly outline management and operational succession plans to carry your farm through any significant leadership changes.
  • Scenario-Based Training: Engage in regular training exercises to simulate various crises, ensuring protocols are practiced and improved over time.
  • Effective Communication: Establish redundant communication channels and be clear about who is authorized to speak on behalf of the operation.

Summary:

Dairy producers need a robust contingency plan to survive and thrive in the face of unforeseen challenges, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, changes in government policies, H5N1 avian influenza outbreaks, and Foot-and-Mouth Disease (FMD) danger. During a crisis, it is crucial to understand the full spectrum of resources, including knowledge of processes, local emergency response teams, and surrounding utility services. Prepositioning assets can improve reaction time and guarantee readiness for effective crisis management. Financial readiness, with enough cash reserves and working capital, is the first line of protection in any crisis. A robust risk management plan includes insurance products and market price protection measures, such as crop insurance and income insurance. Adopting a proactive approach allows dairy farms to navigate unanticipated circumstances with resilience, protecting operations against uncertainty. A “Plan B” for employment readiness involves seamless transferring responsibilities, creating backup plans, and establishing a culture where leaders are dedicated to teaching their successors. Good succession planning includes continuous mentoring, enabling essential staff members to acquire leadership positions, and improving staff competency. A leadership team evaluates relevant circumstances, creates a basic reaction strategy, and involves the entire farm team in drills. Strategic communication is essential in a crisis, and backup lines of communication are created to keep everyone informed.

Learn more:

Categories : Management
Tags : , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Unmasking Supply Chain Vulnerabilities: The Untold Struggles of Dairy Farmers in Times of Disruptions and Pandemics

Tuesday, July 2nd, 2024

Learn how dairy farmers deal with supply chain issues during pandemics. What problems do they encounter with feed supply and product distribution? Discover the answers now.

Though it is a significant component of our diet and essential for rural economies, the dairy sector suffers major supply chain problems. These issues become evident during disturbances like the COVID-19 epidemic, influencing labor availability, feed supplies, and transportation of perishable goods. Strengthening the sector against further shocks depends on an awareness of these difficulties. The issues dairy producers deal with and the consequences of supply chain disruptions are investigated in this paper. It advises calculated actions to foster sustainability and resilience. Every disturbance highlights the connectivity of our supply chains and the necessity of solid and adaptable mechanisms to help farmers and food security.

Understanding the Supply Chain: A Lifeline for Dairy Farmers

Dairy producers rely on the milk supply chain for revenue, so its efficiency and strength are vital. Unlike other agricultural sectors, dairy production is complex because milk is perishable and mainly generated locally. This regional dairy supply chain in the United States needs help to incorporate modern technologies to guarantee seamless milk delivery from farmers to customers.

Truck drivers play a pivotal role in the dairy supply chain, especially during periods of high demand, such as the COVID-19 pandemic. Handheld tools have revolutionized real-time tracking and communication, enhancing the efficiency of transportation logistics. When integrated with advanced routing and scheduling systems, these tools are instrumental in optimizing milk shipping, reducing delays, and minimizing spoilage. More than a technological tool, this innovation is a beacon of hope for a resilient supply chain, helping to avert transportation and storage issues.

Further difficulties arise from supply systems’ worldwide character. International commerce compromises the system even as it expands markets. Disturbances in anything—from feed imports to export logistics—can have broad consequences. We need a robust local system to manage global problems like pandemics without drastically affecting consumers or farmers. This system must include local feed production, varied export markets, and contingency strategies for many possibilities. These steps will help improve the dairy sector’s resilience and lessen the dependence on worldwide supply networks.

Seasonal variations in dairy output further add to the complexity and need for careful planning and production balance. To satisfy consumer needs, farms must control times of both shortage and excess. Good supply chain management and seamless manufacturing, transportation, and storage coordination are essential. This guarantees milk’s continuing excellent quality from farm to table.

From Farm to Table: Where the Breakdown Begins

Although milk’s route from farm to table calls for exact coordination, the COVID-19 epidemic highlighted several areas needing work. Delays in animal feed deliveries harmed dairy farms, influencing cow health and output levels.

Milk’s delivery to processing facilities also presented problems. Although routing software seeks to maximize paths, truckers’ growing dependence on portable devices and the localized character of the U.S. milk supply chain caused delays resulting from interstate limits and labor shortages.

Processing factories turn raw milk into many goods. Products like cheese, with longer manufacturing cycles, were disrupted, affecting supply and financial stability. Seasonal production alters imply farms have to balance their capability for output. Data insights offered by precision dairy farming technologies help to maximize these processes.

The supply chain has to be able to resist unplanned interruptions. Advanced technology promises more resilience and efficiency. The epidemic underlined the importance of infrastructure investment and backup preparation. To help the sector be stable, dairy producers and associated players must improve the supply chain.

The Domino Effect: How Feed Supply Disruptions Impact Dairy Farms

For dairy farms, feed delivery interruptions cause significant problems rather than minor annoyances. Interventions in forage and basic grains may alter dairy product quality, lessen milk output, and decrease cow productivity. Finding other feed sources raises expenses and calls for speedy adaptation to new nutrition profiles, which runs the danger of compromising cattle health.

American regional milk supply networks exacerbate these issues as farmers in certain regions experience localized shortages and price swings, taxing profit margins. This problem emphasizes the importance of intelligent logistics and necessary backup preparation.

Technology may assist in lowering these risks using precision dairy farming, a data-driven method of dairy farm management, and sophisticated monitoring and logistical tools. Modern routing and scheduling tools, as well as handheld tools for drivers, help to enhance milk movement. Still, the 80,000-pound weight restriction for trucks complicates matters. Resolving feed supply interruptions requires a diverse strategy, including regulatory support, planning, and creativity to safeguard the dairy sector.

Logistics Nightmares: Distribution Challenges in the Dairy Industry

Outside interruptions and inefficiencies aggravate the logistical problems facing the dairy sector. Particularly in times of great demand or disturbance like the COVID-19 epidemic, the geographical character of milk supply networks in the United States makes distribution more difficult and results in bottlenecks and delays.

The 80,000-pound weight restriction for trucks is one major issue, raising transportation expenses and impacting dairy logistics’ carbon footprint. Although computerized routing and scheduling help to enhance transportation, rules still need to be improved.

The dairy supply chain is brittle, and timely, temperature-regulated deliveries are vital. Any delay could damage the safety and freshness of products, leading to financial losses. Though they have increased productivity, innovations like mobile gadgets and real-time monitoring software must be deployed more broadly—especially on smaller farms.

For goods with extended expiry dates, rail travel might be a more consistent, reasonably priced choice that helps relieve road traffic load. But this requires infrastructure growth and investment, taxing an already strained sector.

The logistical problems of dairy distribution draw attention to the necessity of changes and fresh ideas. Stakeholders have to cooperate to strengthen and simplify the supply chain. Dairy producers, supply chain partners, legislators, and regulators should all be part of this cooperation. Working together, funding technology, and supporting legislative reforms can help improve the dairy supply chain and increase its resilience to future shocks. These group efforts are necessary for weaknesses to continue undermining the sector’s stability and expansion.

Pandemics Unveiled: COVID-19 and Its Toll on Dairy Farms

The COVID-19 epidemic underlined the relationship between farm operations and distribution and demonstrated how brittle the dairy supply chain may be. Lockdowns impacted labor, hindering farm maintenance and milk output.

Farmers had to contend with tight rules and move to selling directly to customers when eateries shuttered. The 80,000-pound weight restriction for vehicles transporting significant milk volumes makes transferring such quantities more difficult.

Feed shortages caused by global supply chain problems degraded herd health and output. With fewer employees and tight health regulations, processing plants suffered, reducing capacity.

Technology may be helpful here. Digital technologies and precision dairy farming enhance information and communication. Smaller farms, however, may require assistance to pay for these expenditures.

COVID-19 made clear that a more robust, adaptable supply chain is vital. Reviewing truck weight restrictions and rail travel might make the system more resistant to future issues.

Financial Struggles: The Economic Impact of Supply Chain Disruptions on Dairy Farmers

Dairy producers struggled greatly financially during COVID-19. Disturbances in the supply chain caused delays and added financial burdens. The unexpected decline in demand from restaurants, businesses, and schools left farmers with excess perishable goods, hurting their financial situation.

The problem worsened with the regional character of milk supply networks in the United States. Unlike centralized processes, the scattered dairy business had more significant financial difficulties and delays. Seasonal variations in dairy output further complicate the matching of market demand.

Though costly—many farmers cannot afford them—technological solutions like precision dairy farming might increase supply chain efficiency. Truck transportation expenses rise with the 80,000-pound weight restriction. Although other technology developments and mobile gadgets aid, their initial cost might be a deterrent.

Ultimately, the economic effects of supply chain interruptions during COVID-19 showed the financial systems of the dairy industry. To address these problems, we must increase resilience, use modern technology, and advocate laws simplifying logistics.

Future-Proofing: Strategies for Building a More Resilient Dairy Supply Chain

Dairy producers. Must act pro-ahead to keep their businesses free of issues. Precision dairy farming, among other technological instruments, helps monitor herd health and production during disturbances. Effective routing and scheduling tools help milk go to processing facilities, lowering logistical risk.

A localized approach to milk production provides stability by limiting dependence on long-distance transportation, minimizing interruptions, and supporting sustainability. This approach reduces the carbon impact and cuts the journey distance.

One must use sustainable supply chain techniques. Investing in renewable energy, such as solar or biogas, lessens the need for outside sources and satisfies customer demand for environmentally friendly goods.

Solid and honest ties with suppliers are essential. Creative portable tools help processors, farmers, and truckers coordinate better. Sharing real-time data enables fast reactions to disturbances.

Finally, dairy farms should have contingency plans for all disturbances, from severe storms to pandemics. These strategies should include many sources for necessary materials and different ways of delivery. Dairy producers who foresee difficulties and equip themselves might convert weaknesses into assets.

The Bottom Line

Many dairy producers depend critically on the dairy supply chain. Particularly in times like the COVID-19 epidemic, disruptions may lead to shortages of feed supplies and issues transporting goods to customers. They looked at how these disturbances affected the GDP. Any disturbance has a significant effect on farmers as well as the whole sector. Strategies for a robust supply chain must so be followed strictly.

Policymakers and businessmen should prioritize strengthening the dairy supply chain. New technology and financial assistance, among other support tools, should help farmers cope with interruptions. Moreover, increasing consumer knowledge might support resilience development. We can safeguard dairy farming’s future by encouraging adaptable plans and sustainable methods.

Fixing supply chain weaknesses in the dairy sector is vital socially and economically. Being proactive will guarantee dairy producers a solid and sustainable future.

Key Takeaways:

  • The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted critical vulnerabilities within the dairy supply chain, emphasizing the need for more robust, resilient systems.
  • Technological advancements, such as handheld communication devices and sophisticated routing software, can mitigate disruptions and enhance efficiency in dairy logistics.
  • Localizing supply chains and investing in infrastructure, such as rail transportation for dairy products, can reduce dependency on global logistics and extend product shelf life.
  • Sustainable practices, including adopting renewable energy sources, offer dual benefits of reducing reliance on external suppliers and meeting eco-conscious consumer demands.
  • Innovative solutions and strategic planning are essential to navigating the complexities of seasonal dairy production and effectively balancing supply and demand.

Summary:

The dairy sector is facing significant supply chain challenges due to the COVID-19 pandemic, impacting labor availability, feed supplies, and perishable goods transportation. Modern technologies can help ensure seamless milk delivery by incorporating handheld tools that revolutionize real-time tracking and communication, optimizing milk shipping, reducing delays, and minimizing spoilage. A robust local system is needed to manage global problems without affecting consumers or farmers. Good supply chain management and seamless manufacturing, transportation, and storage coordination are essential for maintaining milk quality. Precision dairy farming technologies can help maximize processes and resist unplanned interruptions. Stakeholders must cooperate to strengthen and simplify the supply chain, funding technology, and supporting legislative reforms to improve the dairy supply chain and increase resilience to future shocks. To address the economic effects of supply chain disruptions during COVID-19, dairy producers must act proactively, using technological instruments like precision dairy farming, effective routing and scheduling tools, a localized approach to milk production, sustainable supply chain techniques, strong supplier relationships, and contingency plans.

Learn more:

Categories : Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza
Tags : , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

USDA Proposes Return to ‘Higher-Of’ Method for Fluid Milk Pricing: What It Means for Dairy Farmers

Tuesday, July 2nd, 2024

Learn how USDA’s plan to bring back the ‘higher-of’ method for milk pricing might affect farmers. Will this change help dairy producers? Find out more.

The USDA plans to bring back the ‘higher-of’ pricing method for fluid milk, a move intended to modernize federal dairy policy based on a comprehensive 49-day hearing that evaluated numerous industry proposals. This method picks the higher price between Class III (cheese) and Class IV (butter and powder) milk, which could signify a notable shift for the dairy industry. Previously, the 2018 Farm Bill had replaced the ‘higher-of’ system with an ‘average-of’ pricing formula, averaging Class III and IV prices with an additional 74 cents. While switching back might benefit farmers, it also introduces risks like negative producer price differentials in 2020 and 2021. The USDA’s proposal seeks to mitigate these challenges and provide farmers financial gains amidst modern dairy economics’ complexities.

Understanding the Federal Milk Marketing Order (FMMO) System 

The Federal Milk Marketing Order (FMMO) system, established in 1937, plays a crucial role in ensuring fair and competitive dairy pricing. It mandates minimum milk prices based on end use, providing price stability for dairy farmers and processors across the U.S. Each FMMO represents a distinct marketing area, coordinating pricing and sales practices. 

The ‘higher-of’ pricing method for Class I (fluid) milk has long been integral to this system. It sets the Class I price using the higher Class III (cheese) or Class IV (butter and powder) price, offering a financial safeguard against market volatility. This method ensures dairy producers receive a fair price despite market fluctuations. 

However, the 2018 Farm Bill introduced an ‘average-of’ formula, using the average of Class III and IV prices plus 74 cents. While aimed at modernizing milk pricing, this change exposed farmers to greater risk and reduced earnings in volatile periods like 2020 and 2021.

A Marathon Analysis: Unraveling Modern Dairy Policy over 49 Days in Indiana

The marathon hearing in Indiana highlighted the complexities of modern dairy policy. Spanning 49 days, from Aug. 23, 2023, to Jan. 30, it reviewed nearly two dozen industry proposals. This intensive process reflected the sophisticated and multifaceted Federal Milk Marketing Order system as stakeholders debated diverse views and intricate data to influence future milk pricing.

Decoding Dairy Dilemmas: The “Higher-Of” vs. “Average-Of” Pricing Methods

The “higher-of” and “average-of” pricing methods are central to understanding their impact on farmers’ incomes. The “higher-of” process, which uses the greater of the Class III (cheese) price or Class IV (butter and powder) price, has historically provided a safety net against dairy market fluctuations. This method ensured farmers got a better price, potentially safeguarding their income during volatile times. Yet, it increased the risk of negative producer price differentials, which reduced earnings in 2020 and 2021. 

On the other hand, the “average-of” method, introduced by the 2018 Farm Bill, calculates the price as the average of Class III and IV prices plus 74 cents. While this seems balanced and predictable, it often fails to deliver the highest financial return when either Class III or IV prices exceed expectations. Farmers have noted that this method might not reflect their costs and economic challenges in volatile markets. 

The “higher-of” method often offers better financial outcomes during favorable market conditions but brings increased uncertainty during unstable periods. Conversely, the “average-of” method offers stability but may miss optimal pricing opportunities. This debate within the dairy industry over the best formula to support farmers’ livelihoods continues. Thus, the USDA’s proposal to revert to the “higher-of” method invites mixed feelings among farmers, whose earnings and economic stability are closely tied to these pricing mechanisms.

Examining the Potential Implications of the USDA’s Return to the ‘Higher-Of’ Pricing Method 

The USDA’s return to the ‘higher-of’ pricing method, while potentially beneficial, also presents some challenges that the industry needs to be aware of. This approach, favoring the higher Class III (cheese) or Class IV (butter and powder) prices, seems more beneficial than the ‘average-of’ formula. However, deeper insights indicate potential challenges that need to be carefully considered. 

The ‘higher-of’ method usually leads to higher fluid milk prices but poses the risk of negative producer price differentials (PPDs). When the Class I price far exceeds the average of the underlying class prices, PPDs can become negative, as seen during the harsh economic times of 2020 and 2021, exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic. 

Negative PPDs can hit farmers’ financial stability, making it harder to predict income and manage cash flows. This reflects the delicate balance between gaining higher milk prices now and ensuring long-term financial reliability. 

The 24-month rolling adjuster for extended-shelf-life milk introduces further uncertainty. Its effect on milk pricing needs to be clarified, potentially causing fluctuating incomes for farmers in this segment. 

In conclusion, while the ‘higher-of’ pricing method may offer immediate benefits, risks like negative PPDs and uncertain impacts on extended-shelf-life milk pricing demand careful consideration. Farmers must balance these factors with their financial strategies and long-term sustainability plans.

New Horizons for ESL Milk: Navigating the 24-Month Rolling Adjuster Amidst Market Uncertainties

Under the USDA’s new proposal, regular fluid milk will revert to the ‘higher-of’ pricing. In contrast, extended-shelf-life (ESL) milk will follow a different path. The plan introduces a 24-month rolling adjuster for ESL milk to stabilize prices for these longer-lasting products. 

Yet, this change brings uncertainties. Laurie Fischer, CEO of the American Dairy Coalition, questions the impact on farmers. The 24-month adjuster is untested, making it difficult to foresee its effects amid fluctuating market conditions. ESL milk’s unique production and logistics further complicate predictions. 

Critics warn that the lack of historical data makes it hard to judge whether this method will help or hurt farmers. There’s concern that it could create more price disparity between regular and ESL milk, potentially straining producers reliant on ESL products. While USDA aims to tailor pricing better, its success will hinge on adapting to real-world market dynamics.

Make Allowance Controversy: Balancing Processor Profitability and Farmer Finances

The USDA also plans to increase the make allowance, a credit to dairy processors to cover rising manufacturing costs. This adjustment aims to ensure processors are adequately compensated to sustain profitability and operational efficiency, which is expected to benefit the entire dairy supply chain. 

However, this proposal has drawn substantial criticism. Laurie Fischer, CEO of the American Dairy Coalition, argues that the increased make allowance effectively reduces farmers’ milk checks, disadvantaging them financially.

Pivotal Adjustments and Economic Realignment in Dairy Pricing Formulas

The USDA’s proposal adjusts pricing formulas to match advancements in milk component production since 2000. This update ensures that farmers receive fair compensation for their contributions. 

The proposal also revises Class I differential values for all counties to reflect current economic realities. This is essential for maintaining fair compensation for the higher costs of serving the fluid milk market. By reevaluating these differentials, the USDA aims to align the Federal Milk Marketing Order system with today’s economic landscape.

Recalibrating Cheese Pricing: Transition to 40-pound Cheddar Blocks Only

Another critical change in USDA’s proposal is the shift in the cheese pricing system. Monthly average cheese prices will now be based solely on 40-pound cheddar blocks instead of including 500-pound cheddar barrels. This aims to streamline the process and more accurately reflect market values, impacting various stakeholders in the dairy industry.

Initial Reactions from Industry Leaders: Balancing Optimism with Key Concerns 

Initial reactions from crucial industry organizations reveal a mix of cautious optimism and significant concerns. The National Milk Producers Federation (NMPF) showed preliminary approval, noting that USDA’s proposal incorporates many of their requested changes. On the other hand, Laurie Fischer, CEO of the American Dairy Coalition, raised concerns about the make allowance updates and the impact of extended-shelf-life milk pricing, fearing it might hurt farmers’ earnings.

Structured Engagement: Navigating the 60-Day Comment Period and Ensuing Voting Procedure

To advance its proposal, USDA will open a 60-day public comment period, allowing stakeholders and the public to share insights, concerns, and support. This process ensures that diverse voices within the dairy industry are heard and considered. Once the comment period ends, USDA will review the feedback to gain a comprehensive understanding of industry perspectives, informing the finalization of the proposal. 

Afterward, the USDA will decide based on the collected data and input. However, the process continues with a voting procedure where farmers pooled under each Federal Milk Marketing Order (FMMO) cast votes to approve or reject the proposed amendments. Each Federal Order, representing different regions, will vote individually. 

This voting process is crucial, as it directly determines the outcome of the proposed changes. For adoption, a two-thirds majority approval within each Federal Order is required. Suppose a Federal Order fails to meet this threshold. In that case, USDA may terminate the order, leading to significant changes in how milk pricing is managed in that region. This democratic approach ensures that the final policies reflect majority support within the dairy farming community, aiming for fair and sustainable outcomes.

Regional Impacts: Navigating the Complex Landscape of FMMO System Changes

The proposed changes to the Federal Milk Marketing Order (FMMO) system are bound to impact various regions differently, given each Federal Order’s unique economic landscape. Federal Order 1, covering most New England, eastern New York, New Jersey, Delaware, southeastern Pennsylvania, and most of Maryland, may benefit from more favorable fluid milk pricing due to the higher-of method. With significant urban markets, this region could see advantages from updated Class I differential values addressing the increased costs of serving these areas. 

On the other hand, Federal Order 33—encompassing western Pennsylvania, Ohio, Michigan, and Indiana—might witness mixed outcomes. This area has substantial dairy manufacturing, especially in cheese and butter production, which could gain from the new cheese pricing method focusing on 40-pound cheddar blocks. However, the higher make allowance might stir controversy, potentially cutting farmers’ earnings despite adjustments for rising manufacturing costs. 

The future remains uncertain for western New York and most of Pennsylvania’s mountain counties, which any Federal Order does not cover. These areas could feel indirect effects from the new proposals, particularly the revised pricing formulas and allowances, which could impact local milk processing and producer price differentials. 

While the higher-of-pricing method may benefit farmers by securing better fluid milk prices, the regional impacts will hinge on each Federal Order’s specific economic activities and market structures. Stakeholders must examine the proposed changes closely to gauge their potential benefits and drawbacks.

The Bottom Line

The USDA’s push to reinstate the ‘higher-of’ pricing method for fluid milk marks a decisive moment for the dairy industry. The 49-day hearing in Indiana underscored the complexity of the Federal Milk Marketing Order (FMMO) System. Key aspects include reverting to the ‘higher-of’ pricing from the 2018 ‘average-of’ formula, new pricing for extended-shelf-life milk, and the debate over increased make allowances. Significant updates to pricing formulas and cheese pricing methodologies were also discussed. 

The forthcoming vote on these changes is critical. With the power to reshape financial outcomes for dairy farmers and processors, each Federal Order needs two-thirds approval to implement these changes. Balancing modern dairy policy advancements with fair profits for all stakeholders is at the heart of this discourse. 

Ultimately, these decisions will affect dairy practices’ economic landscape and sustainability nationwide. This vote is a pivotal moment in the evolution of the American dairy industry, demanding informed participation from all involved.

Key Takeaways:

  • The USDA plans to reinstate the “higher-of” method for pricing Class I (fluid) milk, reversing the “average-of” formula introduced in the 2018 Farm Bill.
  • A 332-page recommendation outlines the USDA’s proposed changes, following a comprehensive 49-day hearing in Indiana.
  • The reinstatement is anticipated to benefit farmers most of the time, though it may introduce risks like negative producer price differentials.
  • New pricing structures will affect regular fluid milk and introduce a 24-month rolling adjuster for extended-shelf-life (ESL) milk.
  • The USDA will update pricing formulas to reflect increased milk component production and adjust Class I differential values to better capture the costs of serving the fluid market.
  • There will be changes in cheese pricing, with average monthly prices based solely on 40-pound cheddar blocks.
  • The proposal also includes an increase in the make allowance for processors, a point of contention among industry stakeholders.
  • The USDA will open a 60-day public comment period before making a final decision, with each Federal Milk Marketing Order region voting individually on the proposed changes.

Summary:

The USDA plans to reintroduce the ‘higher-of’ pricing method for fluid milk, a move aimed at modernizing federal dairy policy. This method, which selects the higher price between Class III and Class IV milk, could be a significant shift for the dairy industry. The 2018 Farm Bill replaced the ‘higher-of’ system with an ‘average-of’ formula, averaging Class III and IV prices plus an additional 74 cents. This change could benefit farmers but also introduce risks like negative producer price differentials (PPDs). The Federal Milk Marketing Order (FMMO) system ensures fair and competitive dairy pricing, and the ‘higher-of’ method usually leads to higher fluid milk prices but also poses the risk of negative producer price differentials (PPDs). Negative PPDs can impact farmers’ financial stability, making it harder to predict income and manage cash flows. The 24-month rolling adjuster for extended-shelf-life milk introduces further uncertainty, potentially causing fluctuating incomes for farmers. The USDA’s proposal to increase the make allowance, a credit to dairy processors, has been met with criticism from industry leaders. The USDA will open a 60-day public comment period to advance its proposal. The proposed changes to the FMMO system will impact various regions differently due to each Federal Order’s unique economic landscape.

Learn more:

Categories : Dairy Markets
Tags : , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Tags

A.I. Industry animal welfare butter prices challenges China cow health Dairy Cattle Dairy Cattle Marketing dairy cows dairy farmers Dairy Farming dairy farms Dairy Industry dairy market trends dairy producers dairy production efficiency farmers Feed Costs Feed Efficiency Genetic Evaluation System Genomics greenhouse gas emissions growth Health Herd Health innovation Management milk output milk prices Milk Production milk quality milk yield monitoring New Zealand nutrition production productivity Profitability resilience sustainability Technology United States USDA World Dairy Expo

Style_Bullvine
Style_Bullvine
Style_Bullvine
Slide 8
Slide 8
Slide 8
Slide 5
Slide 5
Slide 5
Slide 5
Slide 5
Slide 5
Slide 7
Slide 7
Slide 7
Overlays

Send this to a friend