Archive for Council on Dairy Cattle Breeding

Sire Summaries Simplified: A Dairy Farmer’s Guide to U.S. Genetic Evaluations

Unlock the U.S. genetic system. Make smarter breeding choices and improve your herd’s productivity. Ready?

Understanding the U.S. genetic system empowers you to make better breeding decisions. This knowledge can boost your herd’s production and profitability. Learning to read sire summaries helps you choose the best breeding options, leading to better efficiency and profits. Tools like Breeding Value and Predicted Transmitting Ability predict how well an animal will perform. Having reliable data makes breeding decisions easier. Essential organizations like CDCB and Holstein USA play a significant role in genetic testing. Knowing what they do can help you make smart choices with confidence.

Deciphering Genetics: Breeding Value vs. Predicted Transmitting Ability (PTA)

Understanding the Basics: First, let’s break down the difference between Breeding Value and Predicted Transmitting Ability (PTA). Breeding Value is about an animal’s potential in a breeding plan for traits like milk or protein. Conversely, PTA is about what that animal will likely pass on to its offspring.

The Power of Data: Fueling Genetic Advancement in Dairy Farming

Data is the key to growth in dairy farming. The U.S. uses data from different farms and regions to support its genetic assessment system. Your help in collecting this data is vital for building reliable Predicted Transmitting Abilities (PTAs). These PTAs guide breeding decisions and can significantly boost your herd’s performance. Be proud of your essential role in this progress. 

The accuracy of these genetic predictions depends on the amount and variety of data we gather. More data means more precise and helpful genetic insights, which allows farmers to make wise choices, leading to healthier, more productive animals and a more successful dairy business

This approach is led by organizations like the Council on Dairy Cattle Breeding (CDCB) and Holstein USA. They work hard behind the scenes to collect and study vast amounts of genetic data. Their work ensures that genetic studies are detailed and reflect the conditions faced by dairy herds across the country. 

Strong data systems in these organizations form the foundation of the U.S. dairy genetic framework. This team effort demonstrates how data is essential for genetic progress and keeps U.S. dairy competitive worldwide.

The Dynamic Duo: How CDCB and Holstein USA Lead Dairy Genetics

When studying dairy genetics, it is essential to know the roles of the Council on Dairy Cattle Breeding. CDCB gathers and reviews data about milk production and health traits, which form the basis of its genetic evaluations and indexes. 

On the other hand, the Holstein Association USA concentrates on type and conformation traits. It handles classification evaluations that help breeders understand their herds’ physical traits, such as udder shape, leg formation, body size, and other key type characteristics. 

Together, CDCB and Holstein USA work to create comprehensive indexes like the Total Performance Index (TPI) and Net Merit (NM$). The TPI combines productivity, health, and type traits into one measure, helping farmers track genetic improvements and make informed breeding decisions. The NM$ assesses a bull’s worth based on lifetime earnings, considering production, lifespan, and health traits. These tools help farmers choose sires to boost their herd’s productivity and lifespan.

Unlocking Genetic Potential: The Role of PTAs and STAs in Herd Optimization

Understanding traits and their effects is key for dairy farmers who aim to boost their herd’s genetic potential. PTAs are listed as STAs, which makes it easier to compare traits. Traits like milk yield, fat, and protein significantly affect profit. On the other hand, traits like Udder Composite and Feet & Legs Composite are crucial for a cow’s longevity and functionality. Farmers can use this information to make smarter breeding choices.

Proven Versus Genomic Young Bulls: Crafting a Balanced Genetic Strategy

When selecting genetics for your herd, it’s essential to understand the difference between proven bulls and young genomic bulls. Proven bulls have daughter data, which makes their ratings more reliable. This data helps us make better breeding choices. 

Conversely, young genomic bulls offer a glimpse into future potential. Although they have less reliability due to a lack of daughter performance data, they can speed up genetic gains. We evaluate these bulls based on genetic predictions, suggesting how they might perform over time. 

By mixing the two, dairy farmers can have the reliability of experienced bulls and the fresh potential of young genomic bulls. This approach enables a flexible breeding strategy, ensuring steady production and continuous genetic improvement.

Genetic Innovations: Charting a Sustainable Future for Dairy Farming

The future of genetic selection is exciting. Genetic assessments now include new traits like feed efficiency and methane reduction. These traits can make your dairy business more profitable and eco-friendly. They hold great potential for the future of dairy farming and offer new opportunities.

Your Guide to Identifying the Ideal Sire for Your Herd 

  1. Identify the Sire: Take note of the bull’s registration name, number, and percent registered Holstein ancestry (%RHA). This information is generally included at the beginning of the report and is used to identify the bull accurately.
  2. Check Genetic Status and Codes: Examine the genetic codes for specified conditions, such as BLAD, CVM, or Brachyspina. Note whether the bull is free of these or any other problems. This will allow you to prevent possible health concerns in your herd.
  3. Review Parentage Details: Examine the pedigrees, including TPI values, categorization scores, and genetic codes for the father and mother. This will provide a more complete picture of the genetic pool from which the Sire originated.
  4. Evaluate Production Traits: Inspect the PTAs for Milk, Fat, and Protein. These values reflect what the father will likely pass on regarding milk output and components to his progeny. Compare his statistics to his parents’ and the herd’s averages.
  5. Analyze Reliability Scores: Note each attribute’s percentage R (reliability). A higher dependability percentage indicates that the genetic assessment is more trustworthy and based on more evidence.
  6. Understand Health Traits: Examine the health attribute PTAs, including Productive Life (P.L.), Somatic Cell Score (SCS), Sire Calving Ease (SCE), and Daughter Calving Ease (DCE). These characteristics are critical for lifespan, mastitis resistance, and calving ease.
  7. Explore Fertility Indexes: Consider composite measures such as Net Merit (NM$), Cheese Merit (CM$), and Fertility Index. These scores integrate many attributes to estimate the bull’s potential influence on profitability and fecundity.
  8. Review Type and Conformation Traits: Attention the PTA Type (PTAT) and linear trait STAs. These scores indicate the type and conformation qualities, such as udder conformation, feet, and leg quality, which are critical for functioning and lifespan.
  9. Check Distribution of Daughters: Consider the amount and distribution of daughters utilized in the bull’s appraisal. A diversified and large sample size makes assessments more trustworthy across various environmental situations.
  10. Cross-Check Ownership Information: Finally, validate the controller, breeder, and owner information. This information aids in determining the source and availability of the Sire’s genetics for purchase or consultation.

Glossary of Key Terms in Dairy Genetics  

  • Allele: One of two or more gene variants found at a specific chromosomal location.
  • Chromosome: Chromosomes are structures inside cells that carry DNA and numerous genes; calves have 30 pairs.
  • Genotype: A single organism’s genetic makeup often refers to particular genes or alleles.
  • Phenotype: Observable physical qualities of an organism that are influenced by genetics and the environment.
  • Homozygous: Having two identical alleles for a particular gene or genes.
  • Heterozygous: Having two distinct alleles for a specific gene or genes.
  • Predicted Transmitting Ability (PTA): An estimate of a characteristic that a parent will pass on to children.
  • Sire: A male father of an animal.
  • Dam: The female parent of an animal.
  • Linear Composite Indexes: A single numerical value is obtained by combining measurements of numerous related qualities.
  • Somatic Cell Score (SCS): A mastitis indicator; lower scores are preferred as they imply reduced somatic cell count.
  • Productive Life (P.L.): The number of months a cow is estimated to be fruitful in a herd.
  • Net Merit (NM$): A selection index that measures the projected lifetime earnings of an animal.
  • Genomics is the comprehensive study of an organism’s genes (genome), providing extensive genetic information.
  • Standard Transmitting Ability (STA): Genetic assessments for characteristics are stated on a standardized scale to allow for comparison.
  • Inbreeding: Mating between people who are genetically closely related.
  • Outcrossing: Mating unrelated individuals within the same breed increases genetic diversity.
  • Haplotypes: Allele combinations at several chromosomal locations that are inherited together.
  • Embryo Transfer (E.T.): This reproductive technique allows breeders to have several children from a superior mother.
  • In Vitro Fertilization (IVF): A method in which egg cells are fertilized by sperm outside of the animal’s body, often employed in combination with E.T.
  • Dairy Herd Information Association (DHIA): Organizations that use standardized testing protocols to give genetic and managerial information.
  • Council on Dairy Cattle Breeding (CDCB): A company that gathers and analyzes data to provide genetic assessments for dairy cattle.
  • Holstein Association USA: This is the largest dairy cow breed association in the United States, renowned for its comprehensive genetic examinations and services.
  • Sire Summary, A publication including genetic assessments of numerous bulls available for breeding. 
  • Proven Sire: a bull that has recorded genetic assessments derived from data and the performance of its daughters.
  • Genomic Young Bull: a young bull with genetic assessments primarily based on genomic data instead of progeny performance.

Frequently Asked Questions About the U.S. Genetic System 

What is the primary difference between Breeding Value and Predicted Transmitting Ability (PTA)? 

Breeding value is the overall genetic potential of an animal for a specific trait. Predicted Transmitting Ability (PTA), however, indicates the genetic traits an animal will pass on to its offspring. PTA is half the breeding value because offspring inherit only half of their parent’s genes.

How reliable are the PTAs in predicting an animal’s future performance? 

PTAs can be reliable, especially when a lot of data, including genetic details and offspring performance, is used. The reliability ranges from 68% to 99%, and a higher percentage means greater confidence in the prediction.

How do CDCB and Holstein USA data contribute to the TPI and Net Merit indexes? 

Holstein USA provides type and conformation stats, while the Council on Dairy Cattle Breeding (CDCB) provides productivity and health data. Both are key for creating indices like TPI and Net Merit, which are crucial for assessing genetic progress and making smart breeding decisions.

Why is the reliability of genomic young bulls generally lower than that of proven bulls? 

Genomic young bulls have a 68-73% reliability rate. This is because their evaluations rely mostly on genetic testing and parental averages. Proven bulls, however, are over 90% reliable. Their scores include real-world data from the actual performance of their daughters.

What factors influence the development of genetic formulas and indexes? 

Changes in breeding goals, market demands, and economic values impact genetic formulas and indexes. These formulas are updated regularly to reflect industry trends, such as the value of milk components or new health traits like feed efficiency and methane reduction, ensuring they stay relevant to the industry.

Why is collecting phenotypic data still crucial in the genomics era? 

Phenotypic data, like production records and categorization scores, are vital because they verify and enhance genetic predictions. More solid data sets boost the accuracy and reliability of genetic assessments, aiding better selection decisions.

Can use a proven bulls guarantee superior genetic outcomes? 

Selecting a proven bull with high reliability increases the chances of obtaining the desired genes. However, the overall breeding plan, including the matching traits of the dam, must also be considered. Successful genetic improvement requires both careful selection and variety in breeding decisions.

How does the U.S. Genetic System ensure the accuracy of genetic evaluations? 

The U.S. Genetic System ensures precise and reliable genetic evaluations using data from millions of cows. It employs advanced statistical models and receives continuous updates from organizations like CDCB and Holstein USA.

What is the significance of Somatic Cell Score (SCS) in genetic evaluations? 

The Somatic Cell Score (SCS) helps show how well a cow can resist mastitis. A lower SCS means less mastitis, lower treatment costs, better udder health, and higher milk quality.

The Bottom Line

Discovering the secrets of the U.S. genetic system will allow you to make wise, statistically-based choices for your dairy herd. Understanding the functions of CDCB and Holstein USA, the need for PTAs and STAs, and the advantages of both proven and genomic young bulls will help you maximize your breeding program for sustainability and output. Are you thus ready to raise the caliber of your dairy operation?

Key Takeaways:

  • Understanding the difference between breeding value and predicted transmitting ability (PTA) is crucial for informed breeding decisions.
  • The U.S. Genetic System relies on comprehensive data collection from CDCB and Holstein USA to create reliable genetic evaluations.
  • PTAs provide a robust estimate of an animal’s potential to transmit specific traits to offspring, aiding in herd optimization.
  • Reliability in genetic evaluations increases with the volume of data collected from daughters, making proven bulls generally more reliable than genomic young bulls.
  • Genetic advancements and innovations, such as genomics and ecofeed indexes, are shaping the future sustainability and efficiency of dairy farming.
  • Phenotypic data remains essential to validate genetic predictions and ensure accuracy in the genomics era.
  • Dairy farmers should leverage high-reliability PTAs, data analytics, and diverse genetic strategies to achieve optimal herd performance and profitability.
  • Regular review of genetic evaluations and the use of top-ranking sires can help make significant genetic advancements in dairy herds.

Summary:

As the cornerstone of dairy farming, genetic selection can significantly influence herd performance and profitability. This article illuminates the intricacies of the U.S. Genetic System, offering insights into data-driven decisions to optimize breeding outcomes. We delve into Breeding Value vs. Predicted Transmitting Ability (PTA), examine the roles of the Council on Dairy Cattle Breeding (CDCB) and Holstein USA, and explore how technology and data collection shape future dairy genetics. Emphasizing the significance of TPI and Net Merit indices, this discussion underscores the balance of proven and genomic young bulls, the importance of phenotypic data collection, and the aim for sustainability and output in dairy herd management.

Learn more:

Join the Revolution!

Bullvine Daily is your essential e-zine for staying ahead in the dairy industry. With over 30,000 subscribers, we bring you the week’s top news, helping you manage tasks efficiently. Stay informed about milk production, tech adoption, and more, so you can concentrate on your dairy operations. 

NewsSubscribe
First
Last
Consent

Holstein Association USA Announces Leadership Transition: COO Lindsey Worden to Succeed CEO John Meyer

Discover the leadership transition at Holstein Association USA as COO Lindsey Worden prepares to succeed CEO John Meyer. How will this change shape the future?

Holstein Association USA (HAUSA) has announced a significant leadership transition. John M. Meyer, the current Chief Executive Officer (CEO), will be retiring on December 31st, leaving space for Lindsey Worden, the Chief Operating Officer (COO), to follow him as the next CEO beginning January 1, 2025. This change represents a turning point for the company, which Meyer has been guiding for the last 23 years. Having served with HAUSA for 17 years, Lindsey Worden will be the 10th Executive Secretary since its founding in 1885. The world’s biggest dairy breed organization is projected to see ongoing success from the flawless changeover.

John M. Meyer: A Legacy of Growth and Innovation at Holstein Association USA 

Under John M. Meyer’s 23-year leadership, Holstein Association USA reached several benchmarks and saw significant expansion. Meyer committed himself to raising Holstein cow genetic potential and profitability. He instituted cutting-edge mating procedures and sophisticated genetic projects, including genomic testing. Meyer also added more goods and services to the Association, helping dairy companies worldwide. His efforts confirmed HAUSA’s ranking as the biggest dairy breed association worldwide, therefore guaranteeing a bright future for 25,000 members.

The conference in which CEO John M. Meyer revealed his retirement intentions was emotional. Meyer told HAUSA President Jonathan Lamb and Vice President John Burket his intention to retire by the year’s end, giving time for transition preparation.

Following Meyer’s speech, the emphasis shifted to the next generation of leaders. Following a protracted interview process, the HAUSA Board of Directors selected COO Lindsey Worden to take over beginning January 1, 2025. President Lamb valued the Board’s deliberate approach, guaranteeing a seamless transfer and ongoing success for HAUSA.

Celebrating Past Leadership and Embracing a Promising Future

HAUSA President Jonathan Lamb said in the statement made by the board of directors, “I want to congratulate John Meyer for his 23 years of committed service. His efforts have shaped the success of the Holstein Association USA. Lindsey Worden’s capacity to guide the company forward excites us equally. Her great background and dedication to our cause make her the perfect replacement.

Lindsey Worden, a graduate of the University of Wisconsin-Madison who also works in the dairy business as the Council on Dairy Cattle Breeding Board Chair, National Pedigrained Livestock Council Director, and Councilor on the World Holstein Friesian Federation, said, “I am humbled to follow in John’s footsteps and have been grateful to work alongside him and witness many of the significant achievements our organization has enjoyed under his leadership.” Her upcoming promotion marks Respect and honoring of our organization’s rich legacy; I am privileged to be chosen as Holstein Association USA’s new CEO and am eager to negotiate the possibilities and challenges that will drive us into the future.

When John Meyer reflected on the smooth change, he said, “I’m happy about it. For the last 17 years, Lindsey and I have collaborated well as partners. Seeing Lindsey’s amazing development at the Association from undergraduate intern to CEO has been fun. Meyer stressed his faith in Worden’s leadership. He said, “Lindsey, along with HAUSA’s outstanding Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer Barbara Casna, and I will continue to work closely together, and with the HAUSA Board of Directors, to ensure the continuity of the transition along with the continuous success of HAUSA.” Meyer noted the teamwork, “Moreover, I’m also happy for the Holstein team, including staff, the Board of Directors, Association members, and the dairy industry at large.”

Having collaborated with Meyer for more than 16 years, Worden brings a lot of knowledge and expertise to her new position. Her tight cooperation with Casna, the company’s Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer with twenty-one years of experience, guarantees a degree of financial control vital for such a major change. This cooperation assures HAUSA’s stability and readiness for future expansion and creative output.

Meyer, Worden, and CFO Barbara Casna work closely to guarantee a seamless transfer, whose combined experience and skills ensure the HAUSA Board of Directors’ active participation, which helps reinforce this cooperative effort. Together, they want to preserve the continuity and prosperity of the most significant dairy breed association worldwide. Using every leader’s abilities helps the team ensure HAUSA stays strong both during and after the change. Meyer emphasizes the value of teamwork and notes that this group effort includes the “entire Holstein team, including staff, the Board of Directors, Association members, and the dairy industry at large.”

Under the direction of President Jonathan Lamb, the HAUSA Board of Directors is essential at this time of transition. Overseeing the whole change process has been much aided by the Board’s strategic vision and determination. Involving many stakeholders, their cooperative approach shows a dedication to openness and accuracy.

The Bottom Line

The transition in leadership from John M. Meyer to Lindsey Worden marks a pivotal moment for the Holstein Association USA (HAUSA) and its members. This change not only celebrates the remarkable legacy of Meyer’s 23 years of service but also heralds a future guided by Worden’s fresh perspective and extensive industry expertise. Under new leadership, HAUSA continues to position itself as a leader in the dairy industry, striving for enhanced genetics and improved profitability for its members. With Worden at the helm, the association looks forward to navigating upcoming opportunities and challenges while honoring its rich history. 

Visit HAUSA’s official website to learn more about its programs and how they can benefit your dairy operation. You can also stay updated by following its social media platforms, InstagramFacebook, and Twitter.

Key Takeaways:

  • HAUSA CEO John M. Meyer to retire on December 31st, succeeded by COO Lindsey Worden from January 1, 2025.
  • CEO retirement plans were shared with HAUSA President Jonathan Lamb and VP John Burket well in advance.
  • After a comprehensive interview, Lindsey Worden was selected as CEO, becoming the 10th Executive Secretary since 1885.
  • Lindsey Worden holds multiple positions within the dairy industry and is a University of Wisconsin-Madison graduate.
  • Meyer praises Worden’s growth and their 17-year partnership, welcoming the transition.
  • Meyer expresses gratitude to the HAUSA team and the whole dairy industry, ensuring a smooth transition alongside CFO Barbara Casna.
  • Holstein Association USA serves around 25,000 members, enhancing dairy genetics and profitability through various programs and services.

Summary:

Holstein Association USA (HAUSA) is set to change its leadership after John M. Meyer, who has been its CEO for 23 years, retires. The new CEO, Lindsey Worden, will take over on January 1, 2025. Meyer’s tenure has seen HAUSA grow significantly, focusing on increasing Holstein cow genetic potential and profitability. He introduced advanced mating procedures and genetic projects, including genomic testing, and expanded the Association’s offerings to support dairy companies worldwide. HAUSA’s ranking as the largest dairy breed association worldwide ensures a bright future for its 25,000 members. Worden, a graduate of the University of Wisconsin-Madison and a Council on Dairy Cattle Breeding Board Chair, expressed her humbleness and eagerness to follow in Meyer’s footsteps.

Reality Check – Who is Really Controlling the Dairy Breeding Industry?

Often I find as an industry we are guilty of living in a bubble.  While sometimes that has served us well, other times there are situations where it for sure has hurt the dairy breeding industry as a whole.  However, like all bubbles, this will have to burst in order for the industry to advance, otherwise the dairy cattle breeding industry will become irrelevant.

There is no question that the dairy breeding industry is going through times of great change.  Genomics has had a massive effect on not only how we prove bulls, but also on the sources of revenue and the focus of many breeding programs.  There has been great discussion about what the changes in April will have on the industry (Read more: How Genomics is Killing the Dairy Cattle Industry).  There are some far greater issues that many breeders need to think about.

Some Big Hitters Are Coming To the Plate

One such issue is the entry of Pfizer/Zoetis into the animal genetics game.  There is no question that companies like Pfizer have the resources and the experience to come into industries and dominate.  When you compare the size and revenue of the Animal Health market to that of the dairy cattle breeding industry, you really have to wonder why Pfizer would even bother.  There is no question that DNA testing is a very cool science, but companies like Pfizer don’t do things because they think that it is cool.  They do it because they know they can make money.

When you step back and look at this from a 50,000-foot view, I start to think, is this Pfizer wanting to come and take over dairy cattle breeding?  On the other hand, is it that Pfizer sees how they can protect their much larger revenue source, animal health?  Walk with me on this one.  If it is possible to understand genomics to such an extent that we can breed a better cow, does that not include a cow that is more resistant to disease, parasites, and bacteria? Now we’re talking about core revenue sources for Pfizer animal health, now called Zeotis.

That is why when I first saw the announcement from Pfizer in May 2012 about how Canadian Dairy Network, Holstein Canada, Pfizer Animal Health, The Semex Alliance and its owners are going to partner to support delivery of genetic services to the Canadian dairy industry it really got me thinking about is this a good thing or should we be concerned?  While the public relations side of this looked all great with the message that the alliance gives dairy producers access to new genetic testing services, I could not help but think what does this mean if Pfizer/Zoetis now has direct access to all the genomic information not only in Canada but also indirectly for the world?

Also of interest about this move was that instead of being signed by all the members of the industry it was done very selectively.  Instead of being signed by say Canadian Livestock Genetics Association it was done exclusively with the Semex Alliance.  Is there a partnership between Semex and Pfizer that we are not aware of?  Have we as an industry, or our representatives, on our behalf made decisions that we may all regret?  While I am sure from first glance this agreement looked pretty basic, I can’t help but wonder if there are much greater ramifications that have not really been thought through.

Information is Power, But who controls the information?

With these questions about genetic evaluations and genomics, you can’t help but think about the heated discussion around the Council on Dairy Cattle Breeding (CDCB) and who controls genetic evaluations in the US (Read more: Council On Dairy Cattle Breeding: Land of the Free and Home of the Brave?).  The Cooperative Agreement with the USDA Agricultural Research Service (ARS) pertaining to the transfer of the USDA-­‐ARS dairy genetic evaluation service to the CDCB has certainly had many asking who does have control?

While the Bullvine has request several times to do an interview with CDCB officers , Ole Meland, (Chair), Jay Mattison (Vice Chair), Becky Payne (Secretary) and  Gordon Doak (Recording Secretary), we have still not yet been granted the opportunity.

No Demand Means No Market

Of course there is a much bigger issue I think every breeder needs to think about.  While in Canada most breeders are pretty immune to having to think about market demand, you only have to look at the US and Australia to see what happens when market demand goes south.  If consumers are not drinking milk, it does not take long for the industry to dry up.

Worldwide milk consumption in relation to population growth is falling.  While yes total consumption is increasing, we are not keeping pace with other beverages.

With greater international supply and less demand, it doesn’t take long to drive price and revenue down (Read more: Why the Future of the North American Dairy Industry Depends on Supply and Demand). There is no question that breeders and the industry as a whole, needs to pay greater attention to consumer demand as it will have the greatest impact on our future.

The Bullvine Bottom Line

There is no question the world is changing.  It always is and always will.  The question becomes are you ahead of the change or behind it?  If we continue to operate in a bubble or stick our heads in the sand, we will not be the ones driving our own future, but instead will be handed the scraps from the future decided by others.  That is why it is important to know who is controlling the dairy breeding industry?

 

 

Get original “Bullvine” content sent straight to your email inbox for free.

 

 

 

Council on Dairy Cattle Breeding: Land of the Free and Home of the Brave?

For some time now the Council on Dairy Cattle Breeding (CDCB) has been working to establish a “Cooperative Agreement” with the USDA Agricultural Research Service (ARS) pertaining to the transfer of the USDA-­‐ARS dairy genetic evaluation service to the CDCB.  This has culminated in the recent release of a draft Cooperative Agreement for public comment.  The problem is that the draft lacks some of the core values that makes America great, specifically the ability for everyone to operate on a level playing field (access to information) and to be led by brave leadership driving toward a better future.

With these changes come many questions.  Some key issues follow.

Will everyone have access to the information?

Reading the agreement may require having a law degree to fully understand it.  This may be by intention, but it really doesn’t make for light reading.  Some of the language in the proposed agreement is very confusing. It talks about how the CDCB will have ownership and control of the information.  One of the reasons that the USA has been able to become the mega world power that it is was because it was founded on the belief that everyone is created equal and has equal opportunity to achieve success.  Looking at how the use of genomic information was handled in the past does not bode well for how everyone will get free access to the information.  Many smaller organizations are concerned that this will lead to a monopoly for a few A.I. studs.

The proposed wording is in stark contrast to allowing free access to the information for all those involved.  This actually causes a double edged sword.  On one side, the powers that be are limiting the small guy from competing at the same level.  However, there is also the interest about keeping much larger players, such as say Pfizer from entering.  In Canada, Pfizer is already offering genomic testing and what’s to stop them from using their many resources to use that information in new ways (read Are You Ready for Genetically Modified Cattle).

How do we maintain our integrity with breeders worldwide?

Similar to the views expressed by Greg Anderson of Seagull Bay Dairy, many breeders are concerned about the perceived integrity that comes from going away from a government organization (USDA) to a private entity.  Vice President of Holstein USA Glen Brown and Director Bill Wright also express these concerns,  Both men are also  dairy breeders and call for the need to develop  strong business plan, in the following video

 

While I do understand this concern, there are many examples worldwide, such as the Canadian Dairy Network (CDN), which has been able to maintain integrity and do it   without the political hurdles that come with government involvement.

One of the lessons learned from the CDN model is that you need equal representation from all parties involved, not just those who put up the most money.  CDN is majority funded by Industry and specifically A.I., but its board has equal representation from breed associations, breeders, and industry.  This is necessary in order to maintain the integrity of the organization and also to provide effective direction for the future.  One thing is for sure, it will take bold leadership through these times.  This makes me remember when Murray Hunt (Dad for disclosure sake) backed by the Canadian Genetic Evaluation Board, was facing a similar challenge in Canada. At the time he made some bold moves, hiring of Paola Rossi, and Gerald Jansen, Canadians working in Italy to do Canadian genetic evaluations, long before there was the full business plan, but rather had the agreement in principle.  Yes, this was putting the cart before the horse, but it also lead to the formation of the Canadian Dairy Network (CDN).

Who pays the bills?

As Holstein USA Director and dairy breeder Leroy Eggink, points out in the video above, it has been a great scenario for US breeders having taxpayers foot the bill.  But, that gravy train is over.  In Canada when that ship sailed, it left industry footing the bill.  Since A.I. represents the most direct profitable gain from genetic evaluations, that means they are left holding the bag. Ultimately, this cost is passed on to the breeders.  And while the response comes that we pay for all the systems that track and record this information, there is still the cost to convert that raw data into actionable information (bull proofs).

The one area the CDCB needs to remember is that all costs should be expensed equally and should not play favorites with the larger A.I. centers, as happened with Genomic information.  In an interview with Ron Flatness, Flatness International, he repeatedly expressed the concerns around price for the smaller competitors and protecting against un-needed additional fees.  (Following comments are that of the writer and not Ron) Instead of higher membership fees that will limit the involvement of smaller organizations or independent breeders, all costs need to be handled equally.  One standard price per sire sampled vs. a much larger membership fees, would be fair to everyone.

The Bullvine Bottom Line

Be careful what you ask for.  While many breeders want 100% free access to information, it isn’t always a good thing.  While there are many questions that still need to be answered, regarding a business plan, ownership of information and how to be as transparent as possible, I ask the question, “Is this a move to keep, not smaller players, but much larger players out of the marketplace?”

Here are some more great resources:

Dairy producers will have 29 days to comment on the Cooperative Agreement (May 7 to June 4).

If you have questions please contact any of the CDCB officers.

Contact information for USDA representatives:

 

Send this to a friend