Archive for Canadian Dairy Industry

Canada and Mexico Brace for USMCA Shakeup: What Dairy Farmers Need to Know Amid U.S. Election Rumblings

Ready for the impact of the U.S. election on the USMCA? Discover the potential changes for Canadian and Mexican dairy farmers.

Summary:

Hold onto your hats, folks! The looming U.S. election could throw a wrench into the current state of the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA). Both Kamala Harris and Donald Trump have made it clear—renegotiation is on the table. With North America’s trade landscape in their hands, what changes might be in store for Canada’s and Mexico’s interconnected economies? The stakes are sky-high. Canada, with 80% of its exports heading south, is all-in on maintaining its substantial $900 billion trade relationship. Meanwhile, Mexico has its gaze set on shielding its vital vehicle-manufacturing sector while also aligning with U.S. expectations regarding Chinese imports. The U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement is a significant trade deal that has been criticized for its imbalances in economic benefits and labor regulations. Are Canadian and Mexican dairy industries ready to adapt to potential shifts? The debate revolves around dairy market access and tariffs, with two scenarios emerging: reduced tariffs to flood markets with domestic products or tariffs to secure American interests but pose challenges for Mexican businesses relying on U.S. imports. Canada’s economy is at a critical point, while Mexico’s dairy sector faces challenges in balancing U.S. demands and safeguarding its interests.

Key Takeaways:

  • The USMCA renegotiation could reshape the North American dairy market dynamics, affecting supply chains and economic stability in Canada and Mexico.
  • Canada’s essential export relationship with the U.S., particularly in the dairy sector, faces uncertainty, triggering lobbying efforts to safeguard trade agreements.
  • Mexico’s vehicle-manufacturing industry and dairy trade are pivotal points of concern amid U.S. demands regarding Chinese imports.
  • The potential renegotiation reflects broader economic strategies by both Kamala Harris and Donald Trump, impacting industries and bilateral relationships.
  • Stakeholders in the dairy sector should brace for potential shifts in market access and regulatory practices due to changes in digital trade and anticorruption regulations.
  • Regardless of the election outcome, the USMCA’s renegotiation underscores the ongoing evolution of North American economic ties and their global implications.
USMCA trade deal, dairy market access, tariffs impact, Kamala Harris USMCA, Donald Trump renegotiation, Canadian dairy industry, Mexican dairy sector, economic benefits imbalance, trade deal challenges, supply chain adjustments

Have you ever considered how a change in U.S. trade policy might ripple across your dairy farm’s operations? As the U.S. gears up for an election full of contentious debates, the future of the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) hangs in the balance. Kamala Harris and Donald Trump are eyeing renegotiations that could unsettle existing trade relationships. But what does this mean for your dairy business? Let’s find out. 

“Renegotiating USMCA could potentially reshape entire industries, with dairy being one of the most vulnerable.” — Wall Street Journal.

As candidates vocalize their plans, Canada, which exports 80% of its goods to its southern neighbor and Mexico, is on high alert. And with billions of dollars and livelihoods at stake, the tension is palpable. Stay with us as we unpack how these political maneuvers could impact you and your business. 

USMCA: The Dynamic Force Reshaping North American Trade and Its Dairy Implications

The United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) is more than just a trade pact; it’s a dynamic force shaping the economic landscape of North America. Born from renegotiating the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) in 2020, the USMCA was designed to address modern trade issues and boost economic ties among its member countries. Consider it an overhaul to lay the firmer ground for trade between the U.S., Canada, and Mexico. Critical changes honed in on labor laws, environmental protections, and digital trade, which reflect international commerce’s evolving priorities. 

Discuss why this agreement is crucial for the dairy industry, particularly in Canada and Mexico. Under the USMCA, the Canadian dairy market was partially opened to U.S. imports, permitting American dairy farmers greater access to Canadian consumers. This measure promised a bigger pie for U.S. dairy producers while allowing Canadian consumers the liberty of choice with varied pricing options. Mexico, already a significant importer of U.S. dairy products, managed to secure a stable trade lane, ensuring its milk-derived product supplies remain uninterrupted. 

But here’s where things get sticky. Given the current political climate, The trading ecosystem is again teetering at the edge. With another U.S. presidential election at hand, both Kamala Harris and Donald Trump have expressed intentions to renegotiate this pivotal deal. Their intentions focus on addressing perceived imbalances in economic benefits and labor regulations. What does that mean for dairy farmers? Uncertainty isn’t just a shadow over crops; it’s looming over cross-border agreements. 

As Trump wraps up speeches that rally around “fair deals” and Harris emphasizes labor and environmental reforms, it seems inevitable that the USMCA will face potential upheaval. The question is, are the Canadian and Mexican dairy industries prepared to adjust to new rules of engagement? As the political tides shift, the North American dairy sector eagerly awaits.

USMCA: Shifts on the Horizon for North American Dairy Markets?

The United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) is poised for change as political winds shift in Washington. Kamala Harris and Donald Trump have joined the fray and are targeting this pivotal trade pact. But let’s narrow our focus to the dairy industry: What changes are brewing? 

The brouhaha centers around dairy market access and tariffs. Imagine, momentarily, the impact of amending the USMCA’s dairy clauses. Canada, with its vast dairy farms, and Mexico, which relies heavily on U.S. imports, must brace for turbulence. 

Two scenarios emerge under renegotiation. Either party could push for reduced tariffs to flood markets with domestic products. Visions of overflowing milk quotas or cheese stockpiles might give Canadian farmers pause. How will their business plans adapt? Could increased competition from the U.S. drive innovation or breed resentment? 

Conversely, introducing tariffs may secure American interests but spell trouble for Mexican businesses relying on U.S. imports. Picture production lines halting or, worse, shuttering. What’s the ripple effect on the local economy, and how will farmers navigate these uncertain waters? 

Should Harris take the lead, expect diplomatic nuance, potentially emphasizing sustainability alongside trade. On the other hand, a Trump administration might prioritize aggressive deals that promise quick returns stateside. 

In essence, dairy farmers and related businesses in Canada and Mexico must stay vigilant and prepped for any curveballs this political joust throws their way. Where will your allegiances lie, and how will you respond?

Canada’s Trade Tapestry: Will the USMCA Renegotiation Untangle the Dairy Sector? 

Canada’s economy, a vast and intricate tapestry woven around its trading ties with the U.S., stands at a pivotal moment. Over 80% of Canadian exports wend southward, shaping a critical artery for economic vitality. Therefore, the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) is not merely a deal—it’s a lifeline. But with the calls for renegotiation hanging in the air like a looming storm, Canada has every reason to brace itself. 

Now, let’s talk dairy—the buttery core of Canada’s trade concerns. For Canadian dairy farmers and stakeholders like you, the threat of renegotiation is more than a dot on the distant horizon. It’s the real and present thrum in the agricultural pulse. Under the current USMCA terms, Canada faced the daunting reality of granting U.S. dairy producers greater market access. The fear now? This access might expand further under new talks. Yes, that’s something to chew on. 

Canada needs to take this down. Ottawa has ramped up its lobbying efforts, sending envoys well-versed in trade and economics to Washington, D.C. Their message is clear: Preserve the $900 billion trade relationship. But it’s not just about trade value—it’s about the Canadian dairy sector’s survival and competitiveness on the global stage

Imagine the ripple effect on local dairy farms should renegotiations lead to an avalanche of U.S. dairy products pouring into the Canadian market. Canadian farmers could find themselves grappling with a more saturated market, which could lead to potential shifts in pricing and market stability. For those in the dairy business, this could mean revisiting plans, reassessing market strategies, and, more crucially, re-evaluating how to safeguard their livelihoods. 

So, Canada is watching closely as the winds of political change sweep across North America. The question is: In this game of negotiation chess, will Canada be able to protect its dairy sector’s interests against a potential checkmate?

Mexico’s Crossroad: Dairy Dynamics and the USMCA Renegotiation Challenge

As we zero in on Mexico’s perspective, the stakes are high with the imminent renegotiation of the USMCA. Mexico has always held a strategic position within the North American supply chain, primarily through its robust vehicle-manufacturing industry. But its dairy sector deserves attention, too. Consider how closely these industries are tied to your dairy professional or farmer’s livelihood. 

First, let’s examine the cornerstone—the vehicle-manufacturing industry. This industry isn’t just a pillar; it’s a skyscraper in Mexico’s economic landscape. With numerous manufacturing plants across the country, it’s a heavyweight exporter to the U.S. Changes in trade terms could disrupt supply chains, increase costs, and threaten Mexico’s economic growth. But here’s where things get trickier. Consider U.S. demands on Chinese imports. How does Mexico strike a balance without jeopardizing its economic interests? 

Now, onto the dairy sector. Mexican dairy farmers have steadily expanded their production capabilities and market reach. But look out! Changes to the USMCA could impact how fluid dairy products flow across borders. Mexican dairy farmers might see altered competitive dynamics with potential tariffs or regulatory hurdles. Will they need to adjust pricing or seek alternative markets? It’s a daunting thought, especially for those small-scale farmers who rely on consistent trade conditions. 

Balancing the U.S. demands while safeguarding its interests is a challenge for Mexico. The crux of this renegotiation could push Mexican policymakers to weigh vehicle manufacturing privileges against potential concessions in other sectors, like dairy. What are your thoughts as someone directly or indirectly affected by these economic tremors? Please share your opinion, and let’s get this conversation rolling!

USMCA on the Edge: What Could a Renegotiation Mean for the U.S. Dairy Sector? 

The U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement, commonly known as the USMCA, is a linchpin for North American trade—and it might be up for a shakeup. On the American side, the potential renegotiation of this pivotal trade deal is stirring quite the pot. As voters cast their ballots in an election that could redefine Washington’s positions, both Kamala Harris and Donald Trump have their sights set on renegotiation. But what does this mean for the U.S. dairy industry, already facing its challenges? 

First, let’s dive into the heart of the matter. Trade principles in the American playbook have always championed fair and reciprocal trade. However, the execution often varies between administrations. A Trump-led negotiation might emphasize reducing trade deficits, increasing market access for American products, and, let’s not forget, a hard line on Chinese imports, a shared concern for Mexico, too. In contrast, a Harris administration would likely push for policies that balance trade with broader economic and environmental goals. 

For American dairy farmers, these divergent approaches translate to different opportunities and obstacles. A more protectionist stance may shield them from competitive challenges abroad, possibly securing stronger footholds within Canada and Mexico’s lucrative markets. But does erecting barriers align with the core American trade principle of promoting open markets? 

Moreover, dairy farmers must weigh the pros and cons of renegotiation. On one side, they could gain from policies that deliver more consistent access to North America’s vast dairy market. On the other, they may wrestle with restrictions that might emerge from any renegotiated pact. How might these outcomes affect your operations, and are you prepared for the shifts that could be on the horizon? 

The overarching question for American dairy stakeholders remains—do these proposed changes sit well with the free-market ethos that the U.S. has championed for decades? Or do they lean towards a more insular approach that might bite back against agricultural exports down the line?

The Bottom Line

The USMCA stands on the precipice of change, with the American political scene and the economic stances of Canada and Mexico in flux. The renegotiation talks from Harris and Trump are raising eyebrows for good reason. For Canadian and Mexican dairy farmers, there’s more than just milk at stake; their livelihoods, shaped by the web of North American trade, hang in the balance. The uncertainty is palpable. Will their sectors thrive, or are there challenging roads ahead? 

This is the moment to stay vigilant, informed, and prepared. Understanding these shifts can empower you to make strategic decisions for your business. Change breeds opportunity—if you’re ready to seize it. 

We want to hear from you. What do you think about the potential changes to the USMCA? How do you see them affecting your operations? Please share your insights by commenting below, and let’s start the conversation. Your experiences and opinions matter not just to us but also to your fellow industry professionals. 

Learn more:

Join the Revolution!

Bullvine Daily is your essential e-zine for staying ahead in the dairy industry. With over 30,000 subscribers, we bring you the week’s top news, helping you manage tasks efficiently. Stay informed about milk production, tech adoption, and more, so you can concentrate on your dairy operations. 

NewsSubscribe
First
Last
Consent

Canadian Dairy Dilemma: Unpacking the Controversial Milk Dumping Report and Its Industry Implications

The Canadian dairy industry faces scrutiny over allegations that billions are lost due to milk dumping. Are inefficiencies within the supply management system to blame? Let’s delve into the issue and explore what could be done differently. 

Summary:

The Canadian dairy sector is questioning a report revealing significant milk wastage leading to economic and environmental concerns. Authored by Sylvain Charlebois and colleagues, the report highlights that since 2012, about 6.8 billion liters of milk have been wasted, which could have met the dairy needs of around 4.2 million Canadians annually. Critics argue that the supply management framework is at the root of the inefficiencies causing this wastage. The financial impact is steep, with a potential loss of $14.9 billion, and environmental repercussions are notable, equating to 8.4 million tonnes of CO2 emissions—similar to emissions from 350,000 vehicles annually. Suggested reforms include transparency, penalties for overproduction, and strategic reserves for surplus milk. However, these estimates have sparked debate, and there is pressure on government officials to address these concerns with possible policy changes in supply management. This opens a dialogue about the need for innovation and sustainable practices in the Canadian dairy industry.

Key Takeaways:

  • A new report highlights significant waste in the Canadian dairy sector, with billions of liters of milk being discarded, potentially affecting the annual dairy intake for millions of Canadians.
  • The study implies inefficiencies in Canada’s supply management system, suggesting this leads to overproduction and subsequent waste.
  • Authors of the report call for legal measures against milk dumping and advocate for better surplus management practices.
  • There are debates on the validity of the report, with calls for independent validation of the study’s estimates.
  • Concerns are raised about taxpayer funding and foreign ownership in the Canadian dairy sector, questioning the consistency of government policies.
  • The report suggests revising dairy quotas to match market demands and introducing penalties for overproduction.
  • This issue has sparked discussions about the future of supply management and its impact on innovation and integration in Canada’s dairy industry.
Canadian dairy industry, milk waste statistics, economic losses dairy sector, CO2 emissions dairy, supply management system Canada, ecological economics dairy report, milk dumping impact, dairy farmers concerns, policy reform dairy industry, environmental impact milk waste

A recent report on the Canadian dairy industry has ignited a pressing debate. It unveils a staggering 6.8 billion liters of milk dumped since 2012, which could have fed 4.2 million Canadians annually. The economic losses amount to $14.9 billion, while environmental losses result in approximately 8.4 million tonnes of CO2 emissions, similar to the emissions from 350,000 vehicles annually. These alarming figures raise critical questions about the efficiency of current practices and the urgent need for reform in the dairy sector in Canada.

Rethinking the Canadian Dairy Supply Management: A Call for Reform in Light of Surging Milk Waste

The Canadian dairy industry’s supply management system, a key component of agricultural policy, is designed to balance supply and demand. It uses quotas to control the amount of milk produced, ensuring it matches national consumption. This was intended to provide stable and predictable incomes for dairy producers, fostering rural development and economic sustainability. 

However, the system is now under scrutiny due to recent revelations regarding substantial milk waste.  These issues are highlighted in the report titled “Environmental and Economic Implications of Milk Waste in Canada,” co-authored by Sylvain Charlebois, Thomas Elliot, and Benjamin Goldstein.  The report’s findings of billions of liters of milk being discarded cast doubts on the system’s efficiency in its current form. Critics argue that the controls meant to prevent overproduction and stabilize prices have inadvertently contributed to inefficiencies and waste. This has sparked a debate on whether the rigid structure of supply management needs reform to adapt to modern market dynamics and environmental concerns.

Supply Management: Savior or Constraint?

Before the implementation of supply management, the Canadian dairy market was in disarray. Prices were unpredictable, overproduction was common, and financial stability was a constant struggle. Supply management was introduced to bring order to this chaos, stabilizing prices, ensuring farmers a fair income, and meeting domestic demand without creating surplus or shortages. 

Today, the original goals of supply management are at odds with the current challenges of the industry. While the system still provides a safety net for farmers, its rigidity is now a point of contention. As the recent report suggests, the system’s controls, which were meant to prevent overproduction, are now being accused of contributing to significant milk waste. This raises the question: are we stockpiling milk while the market is in need of flexibility and innovation?  

Can a system built to protect now become the very beast that shackles progress? In an era where efficiency and sustainability are paramount, does the original intent still hold its ground? Or is it time to revisit and rethink our approach to supply management, steering it to better align with the evolving environmental and economic landscape? These are the critical questions that the industry, policymakers, and stakeholders need to confront.

Unveiling the Milk Waste Enigma: Financial and Environmental Costs Revealed

The ecological economics study reveals a staggering estimate of milk wastage in Canada, with up to 10 billion litersdiscarded over 12 years. This equates to a potential financial loss of $14.9 billion, highlighting inefficiencies within the supply management system. The environmental repercussions are notable, with the waste contributing to an estimated 8.4 million tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent emissions, mirroring the yearly emissions from approximately 350,000 vehicles. 

Researchers adopted a material flow analysis to assess surplus milk’s environmental, economic, and nutritional implications. However, the study’s reliance on estimates rather than concrete data has drawn criticism. Jacques Lefebvre, CEO of Dairy Farmers of Canada, pointed out the need for independent validation of these assumptions and calculations, suggesting that the data might not fully capture the intricacies of milk disposal practices, which often follow strict regulations and only occur as a last resort.

The Ripple Effect: Diverse Reactions to the Milk Dumping Report Shake the Dairy Industry

The report on milk dumping has stirred significant reactions among various stakeholders, each bringing a unique perspective. Dairy farmers express frustration and concern over the allegations of waste, questioning the accuracy of the reported figures. They fear such findings could tarnish their reputation and lead to stricter regulations. Some insist that the surplus is often due to unforeseen circumstances rather than inefficiency. 

Industry groups are opposing the report, emphasizing its data’s limitations. Jacques Lefebvre, CEO of Dairy Farmers of Canada, states, “The authors of the study acknowledge that much of their conclusions are drawn from ‘estimates’ rather than a robust data set.” He insists, “These data assumptions and calculations must be validated independently.” This highlights a key concern within the industry regarding the need for more concrete evidence before concluding. 

In contrast, government officials are under pressure to address the issue. Calls for policy reform, especially in supply management, dominate discussions. Sylvain Charlebois argues, “My expectation was maybe 100 million liters a year, but it was much higher.” Pointing to the current system’s inefficiencies, he suggests, “The Canadian Dairy Commission must manage surpluses as it does with butter.” 

The differing perspectives between Charlebois and Lefebvre underscore a broader debate on balancing dairy production with market demands and environmental responsibility. As these conversations unfold, stakeholders are urged to come together and collaborate in seeking solutions that ensure sustainability while supporting the economic well-being of Canadian dairy farmers. This shared goal can unite the industry and lead to meaningful reform.

Reforming Supply Management: Addressing Milk Dumping in Canada

The issue of milk dumping in Canada appears to be deeply intertwined with the supply management system. While supply management aims to stabilize market prices and ensure fair wages for farmers, it ironically contributes to inefficiencies that result in significant waste. However, as Charlebois’s critique highlights, reforming the rigid structure of supply management could allow for the dynamism needed to adapt to market demands and prevent overproduction, potentially leading to a more efficient and sustainable dairy industry. 

One of Charlebois’s primary suggestions for reform includes the creation of strategic reserves. This concept isn’t brand new; Canada already manages a butter reserve. However, expanding this strategy to include powdered milk could mitigate waste by providing surplus milk to food banks or other industries instead of discarding it. Such an approach could transform what is currently considered waste into a valuable resource, serving both economic and social needs. 

Charlebois also advocates aligning production quotas with actual market demand. This could prevent overproduction and the resultant need for milk dumping. This alignment requires a more responsive and perhaps technologically integrated approach to forecasting demand, allowing production to be adjusted in real-time and minimizing the mismatch between supply and demand

By addressing these systemic inefficiencies, Canada’s dairy sector could reduce the environmental and financial costs of milk dumping. This would necessitate a shift from a purely protectionist mindset to one that embraces innovation and market responsiveness—ideals that could also enhance competitiveness on a global scale.

Regulatory Crossroads: Lessons from Comparing Milk Dumping Practices in Canada and the U.S.

When we compare Canada’s milk dumping practices to those in other countries, particularly the United States, distinct differences in regulatory frameworks become apparent. Canada’s supply management system seeks to balance supply and demand, which should theoretically minimize waste. Yet, as we’ve discovered, inefficiencies persist, leading to substantial milk dumping. 

In contrast, the United States takes a more market-driven approach. This can result in fluctuating prices, but it also provides less regulatory control over production levels. Consequently, the U.S. often faces even more significant challenges with oversupply, sometimes forcing farmers to discard surplus milk. 

The difference lies in the regulatory intent and execution. Canada’s regulated system aims to stabilize the market for farmers but at the cost of innovation and responsiveness to market changes. Meanwhile, the U.S. model allows for more rapid adjustments to demand but lacks protective measures for farmers during downturns. 

What lessons could Canada learn from this comparison? A hybrid approach might be better. By integrating some market-driven elements within the existing supply management system, Canada could improve its responsiveness to market demands without losing stability. Similarly, seeking flexibility, transparency, and innovation in regulating milk production could reduce waste while maintaining the benefits that Canadian farmers currently enjoy.

Global Dairy Dynamics: Unearthing Lessons from Canada, the U.S., and New Zealand’s Milk Management Strategies

When exploring the global landscape of dairy management, Canada’s supply management system offers insightful contrasts compared to those in the United States or New Zealand. Each system presents unique strengths and challenges, particularly in addressing overproduction and waste, two persistent issues within the dairy sector. 

Canadian Supply Management System: Canada’s approach is characterized by a tightly regulated structure known as supply management that controls production through quotas to stabilize prices and ensure farmer profitability. This model effectively shields the domestic market from extreme fluctuations and global competition, safeguarding farmers’ incomes. However, this security comes at a cost. Critics argue that it stifles innovation and flexibility while contributing to overproduction issues—surplus milk must be handled internally, leading to waste if not addressed promptly through redistribution or processing. 

United States Dairy System: In contrast, the US operates under a more market-driven system, where supply and demand dynamics predominantly dictate production. Farmers face considerable market volatility but benefit from fewer regulatory constraints, fostering innovation and efficiency. The downside is that this system can exacerbate overproduction issues, leading to significant milk dumping when demand slumps, as seen during the pandemic. However, in some cases, advanced processing capabilities and export channels mitigate such waste. 

New Zealand’s Approach: New Zealand, renowned for its large-scale export-oriented dairy industry, follows a deregulated framework. This system promotes efficiency and competition, with cooperative structures like Fonterra playing a pivotal role. While this model enhances global competitiveness and export income, it exposes farmers to international market pressures and price volatility. Nonetheless, New Zealand’s robust processing infrastructure and global distribution networks often enable efficient management of surpluses, minimizing waste. 

In essence, no system offers a perfect solution. Canada’s model provides stability but at the risk of inefficiency and waste. The US system fosters innovation yet struggles with volatility-driven waste. Meanwhile, New Zealand excels in global competitiveness, albeit with exposure to market risks. The key lies in balancing these elements to address overproduction and waste effectively, ensuring a sustainable and responsive dairy sector.

Understanding the Broader Impact: Supply Management, Subsidies, and Trade Relations Under Scrutiny

The economic and policy implications of the milk dumping report are vast, with potential repercussions not only for the Canadian dairy sector but also for international trade relations. At the heart of this discussion is the question of supply management. With the current system leading to surplus production, it may be time to reevaluate its efficiency and effectiveness. Could a revision of quotas that better aligns with market demand offer a solution, preventing overproduction and subsequent waste? 

Government subsidies play a crucial role in the dairy industry’s current landscape. The generous financial support provided to dairy farmers may inadvertently contribute to overproduction by minimizing the economic consequences of waste. Rethinking these subsidies could encourage more responsible production practices while fostering innovation and sustainability within the sector. 

The report also raises questions about Canada’s trade relations, particularly with China. The construction of a Chinese-owned baby formula plant in Ontario, supported by Canadian taxpayer dollars, highlights the complexities of these relationships. Could these foreign investments be better harnessed to benefit Canadian interests, ensuring that domestic industries thrive and that trade relations do not compromise national priorities? 

The report suggests a pressing need for policy reforms that balance domestic needs with international commitments. As such, the government must navigate these challenges carefully, striving for an equilibrium that minimizes waste, supports farmers, and maintains robust international trade relations. The task is daunting but necessary for the long-term viability and sustainability of the dairy industry.

The Bottom Line

In wrapping up our exploration of the challenges faced by the Canadian dairy sector, we find ourselves at a critical junction. The pressing issue of milk waste, estimated at up to 10 billion liters, underscores inefficiencies within the current supply management system. This inefficiency leads to financial loss and raises environmental concerns. 

The discourse on supply management reform is complex, as it involves balancing regulation with innovation. Should we strive for a more flexible system that encourages market responsiveness, or should we maintain our current practices to protect domestic producers? These questions are not quickly answered but are crucial for shaping the industry’s future. 

As we continue this dialogue, consider the broader impact: How can the dairy sector innovate while maintaining stability? What role should government policy play in facilitating or regulating this balance? Share your thoughts and join the conversation. Your perspectives are essential in navigating these uncharted waters. 

Finally, this isn’t just a discussion for industry insiders—it’s a conversation for all stakeholders committed to a sustainable future. Engage with this content by commenting below, sharing it across your networks, or sparking discussions within your professional circles. A robust exchange of ideas will drive the industry forward, ensuring that we cultivate a more resilient and efficient dairy sector for the future.

Learn more:

Join the Revolution!

Bullvine Daily is your essential e-zine for staying ahead in the dairy industry. With over 30,000 subscribers, we bring you the week’s top news, helping you manage tasks efficiently. Stay informed about milk production, tech adoption, and more, so you can concentrate on your dairy operations. 

NewsSubscribe
First
Last
Consent

Modernized LPI to Focus on Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Milkability Enhancements for Canadian Dairy Cows

Discover how Lactanet’s updated Lifetime Performance Index will enhance dairy cow genetics by focusing on greenhouse gas reduction and milkability. Ready for the change?

The Lifetime Performance Index (LPI) is a pivotal tool in the Canadian dairy industry, aiding producers in breeding top-quality cows. It evaluates various traits like production, health, and fertility to help farmers enhance their herds. As Lactanet gears up to update the LPI early next year, the changes will refine trait weightings, add new subindexes, and introduce a sustainability element. This aims to improve focus on reducing greenhouse gas emissions and enhancing milkability, providing a more comprehensive tool for breeders while maintaining its trusted reliability.

As Brian Van Doormaal, Chief Services Officer at Lactanet, points out, “The expected response is relatively high when you breed for these traits.” His expertise in the field adds credibility to the information, keeping the reader engaged.

Navigating Genetic Selection: Leveraging the LPI to Cultivate Optimal Dairy Herds 

The Lifetime Performance Index (LPI) is a critical tool for dairy producers, enabling precise and foresighted breeding of high-quality cows. Integrating traits like production, health, fertility, and longevity, the LPI provides a comprehensive genetic potential assessment. This holistic approach aids in identifying top performers and making informed breeding decisions tailored to producers’ specific goals, reinforcing the importance of the LPI in the dairy industry. 

One of the LPI’s key strengths is its ability to evaluate traits directly impacting milk production and cow health. Producers can select cows excelling in these areas by analyzing milk yield, fat content, and protein levels, enhancing overall herd productivity. Simultaneously, health and fertility traits are meticulously evaluated, enabling the breeding of robust, resilient cows capable of maintaining peak performance. 

Moreover, the LPI’s detailed sub-indexes for specific traits, such as reproduction and health & welfare, allow producers to focus on particular areas of interest. Whether improving calving ability, reducing disease incidence, or enhancing milking speed and temperament, the LPI provides targeted insights for meaningful genetic improvements. The LPI is a strategic guide that helps dairy producers navigate genetic selection complexities to achieve a balanced and optimized herd. 

Modernizing the Framework: Enhancing the LPI for Contemporary Dairy Farming

The proposed changes to the Lifetime Performance Index (LPI) involve significant updates aimed at modernizing its framework to better reflect current priorities in dairy farming. The Health and Fertility group will be divided into two distinct subgroups: Reproduction, which now includes calving and daughter calving abilities, and Health and Welfare. A new Milkability subgroup will incorporate traits such as milking speed and temperament, which were not previously part of the LPI. 

Another significant update is the inclusion of the Environmental Impact subindex, which initially focused on Holsteins due to available data. This subindex evaluates feed and methane efficiency, addressing the need to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. This change highlights Lactanet’s commitment to sustainability by considering how traits like body maintenance, which correlates with a cow’s stature and environmental footprint, impact feed energy usage. 

These enhancements refine how breeders can utilize the LPI, offering precise tools for selecting traits that align with production, health, sustainability, and overall herd improvement. Despite these adjustments, the new LPI is expected to closely resemble its predecessor, retaining a 98% correlation with the current index.

Subtle Shifts, Significant Impact: Van Doormaal on the Continuity and Enhanced Precision of the Modernized LPI

Brian Van Doormaal, Chief Services Officer for Lactanet, emphasizes the subtle changes in the modernized LPI and their alignment with producers’ objectives. “It’s not the relative weighting that determines how much of an impact breeding for these traits could have,” Van Doormaal explained during the Open Industry Session webinar. “It’s your expected response when you breed for these traits. And in these cases, the expected response is relatively high.” 

Van Doormaal underscores that the modifications will not compromise producers’ ability to concentrate on specific traits. He asserts, “When all the numbers are crunched, and the newly introduced traits are brought into the index, the list of top-rated bulls in the categories will remain largely unchanged today.” 

He reassures that the anticipated consistency in top performers reflects the robustness of the current system. “What I believe we’ll be looking at next April is an LPI that will be 98 percent correlated with today’s LPI,” he noted. This continuity alleviates concerns among breeders about potential disruptions or strategic shifts. 

Moreover, Van Doormaal points to the high expected response rates from breeding for the newly emphasized traits. This outcome is rooted in rigorous data analysis and the integration of new genetic discoveries, enhancing the predictability and efficiency of the breeding process. Thus, while the LPI evolves to include modern considerations, its core principles and effectiveness as a breeding tool remain steadfast.

Collaborative Consultations: Tailoring the LPI to Breed-Specific Genetic Goals 

The consultation process between Lactanet and breed-specific organizations has been extensive and collaborative. Since Brian Van Doormaal’s initial proposal in October 2023, Lactanet engaged with Holstein, Ayrshire, Jersey, and Guernsey representatives to refine the modernized Lifetime Performance Index (LPI). Significant discussions focused on fat versus protein weightings, which vary by breed. For example, Holsteins may prioritize protein due to market demands, while other breeds may emphasize fat based on their production systems or consumer preferences. These consultations highlighted the diverse breed-specific goals within the LPI framework. Additionally, Holsteins addressed reproductive health issues like cystic ovaries, whereas Jerseys focused on balancing durability and production. This collaborative dialogue has been crucial in tailoring the LPI to meet the unique genetic goals of each breed.

Refined Genetic Insights: Expanding to Six Sub-Groups for Comprehensive Dairy Cow Evaluation 

The new index will expand from four to six sub-groups of genetic traits, providing a more nuanced evaluation of dairy cow genetics. The existing Health and Fertility category will now be split into Reproduction and Health and Welfare sub-groups. This change includes specific traits like calving and daughter calving ability, offering a more detailed picture of reproductive performance

Introducing the Milkability subgroup will also incorporate milking speed and temperament, which were previously not part of the LPI. By focusing on these practical traits, the modernized LPI aims to provide producers with more comprehensive and actionable genetic information.

Green Genes: Embedding Environmental Impact into Holistic Dairy Cow Selection

The Environmental Impact subindex marks a pivotal moment in genetic selection, highlighting the need for sustainable dairy farming. This subindex, initially for Holsteins, focuses on feed and methane efficiency to reduce the environmental footprint. Extensive data from Holsteins allows for a robust assessment of these traits. This subindex includes body maintenance, linking a cow’s size with its energy use. More giant cows need more energy for maintenance, affecting milk production. Integrating body maintenance ensures a holistic approach, combining efficiency in milk production with environmental responsibility.

Streamlined Insights: The Refined and Accessible LPI for Informed Breeding Decisions 

Modernizing the Lifetime Performance Index (LPI) aims to refine metrics and enhance communication with dairy producers. The updated LPI offers a clearer understanding of a cow’s performance by reconfiguring existing genetic traits into six sub-groups. These subindexes – including Reproduction, Health and Welfare, Milkability, and Environmental Impact – provide specialized insights to guide targeted breeding strategies. For example, breeders looking to enhance milking speed and cow temperament can focus on the Milkability subgroup. Similarly, those interested in sustainability can reference the Environmental Impact subindex for feed and methane efficiency metrics. This structure allows each component to serve as a detailed genetic evaluation tool, aligning with specific breeding goals and operational realities.

Anticipated Outcomes: A Nuanced Yet Stable Transition for Dairy Producers

The revamped Lifetime Performance Index (LPI) promises a smooth transition for dairy producers. Integrating new traits like milk ability and environmental impact with existing core attributes, the modernized LPI offers a comprehensive cow evaluation. Van Doormaal highlights a 98 percent correlation with the current LPI, ensuring minimal changes in top-rated bulls and maintaining confidence in breeding decisions.

Precision in Breeding: Leveraging Relative Breeding Values for Clear Genetic Insights

Each sub-index evaluation will be presented as a “relative breeding value” (RBV), clearly measuring a bull’s genetic potential. The breed average is 500 with a standard deviation of ±100, standardizing trait evaluations for more straightforward interpretation. For instance, Lactanet’s analysis of Canadian Holstein bulls showed that 38.7% had RBVs between 450 and 550, 24% ranged from 350 to 450, and 25% fell between 550 and 650. This RBV system simplifies genetic evaluations and empowers breeders with breed-specific insights.

The Bottom Line

The modernized LPI represents a strategic evolution in dairy cow genetic evaluation, balancing productivity with enhanced health, welfare, and environmental sustainability. The revised LPI offers a more comprehensive tool for breeders by adding traits like calving ability and ecological impact. Consultations have ensured breed-specific needs, such as addressing cystic ovaries in Holsteins, are considered. Introducing relative breeding values makes the LPI user-friendly and effective for informed decisions. This new framework supports continuous herd improvement and aligns with the industry’s goal of reducing greenhouse gas emissions. As Brian Van Doormaal noted, while rankings may remain unchanged, the updated index promises greater precision and relevance, marking a step forward for the Canadian dairy industry.

Key Takeaways:

  • Emphasis on reducing greenhouse gas emissions with a new Environmental Impact subindex, including feed efficiency and methane efficiency, available initially for Holsteins due to data availability.
  • Division of the Health and Fertility group into separate Reproduction and Health and Welfare sub-groups, adding traits like calving ability and daughter calving ability.
  • Introduction of the Milkability subgroup to encompass milking speed and temperament traits, enhancing cow manageability in dairy operations.
  • Body Maintenance is included in the Environmental Impact subindex to factor in the environmental cost of maintaining a cow’s condition relative to its milk production capacity.
  • The modernized LPI aims to remain highly correlated with the current index, ensuring continuity while incorporating new traits.
  • Lactanet’s consultations with breed-specific organizations ensure the updated LPI will account for the unique genetic goals and concerns of different dairy breeds.
  • The updated LPI framework will streamline use, presenting evaluations as relative breeding values based on a standardized breed average, facilitating easier decision-making for breeders.

Summary:

The proposed modernization of the Lifetime Performance Index (LPI) by Lactanet aims to refine genetic selection for Canadian dairy cows by introducing new sub-groups and traits, emphasizing sustainability through reduced greenhouse gas emissions and enhanced milkability, and maintaining breed-specific goals. Brian Van Doormaal assures that these changes will not impede the core utility of the LPI for breeding high-quality cows, with the expected outcome being a closely correlated index to today’s LPI. Detailed consultations and analyses reveal that while nuanced adjustments will provide more precise breeding values, the top genetic performers will largely remain consistent.

Learn more:

Say Good-Bye to Supply Management

For years the topic of Supply Management has been a hot button issue for dairy producers around the world.  Those who operate under a supply management system, such as the one in Canada, are strong advocates for the program.  While those that do not, such as New Zealand, Australia, and the US, tend to look at it with envy and even disdain. Recently there has been a lot of international talk about supplying of the supply management in the dairy sector.  The EU is removing supply management and the US government, who was  proposing a supply management system,   removed it in their most recent farm bill (Read more:  Dairy Farmers from Across the Nation Oppose Supply Management and  Compromise Reached: Supply Management OUT of Dairy Policy in Farm Bill).  With world trade becoming a greater and greater reality for all countries, it is only a matter of time before supply management, as we know it, no longer exists.

With that in mind we decided to take a look at the Canadian Supply Management System and the resulting impact, if it were removed.  Canada’s Milk Supply Management System was created to solve milk surpluses and low returns to farmers.  Understanding how this policy originally came into practice helps explain its longevity.  And understanding how the system works in practice points to the pressures it faces today.  These include astronomical quota costs, unanticipated dairy imports and globally uncompetitive pricing.  The system has had to evolve to address a range of domestic and trade changes.  The current milk supply management operates under three “pillars”: production controls (quota), administered pricing, and import controls.  As conditions have changed, regulations under supply management have changed.  It has been broadly successful in doing so, but its complexity has created operating costs and burdens for government and the dairy industry. Furthermore, with a more global economy, it has recently become a stumbling block in Canadian government world trade talks.  (Read more: Are We Playing Hide and Seek With Supply Management? and  Why the Future of the North American Dairy Industry Depends on Supply And Demand).

What’s the Story around the World?

Comparing Canada to the rest of the world, we find that New Zealand and Australia are at the highly market-oriented end of the continuum.  Canada is at the highly protectionist end. The U.S. and Netherlands/EU are in between.

Canadian milk production has been essentially constant since the mid-1970s and is actually down compared with the early 1960s.  At the same time, milk production in the U.S. has increased steadily.  In Australia, it has increased markedly following policy changes, prior to recent years when widespread drought limited production.  Netherlands dairy production increased steadily before quota controls were imposed in the 1980s and it has been relatively steady since, with a recent increasing trend.  New Zealand’s milk production is significantly up.

And what about milk pricing?  The national patterns diverge to a degree.  The available data suggests that prior to the mid-1980s, milk prices in the countries considered here broadly increased.  Canadian milk prices have continued to increase since the 1980s.  In the U.S. prices abandoned their trend of increases in the 1980s and have since become more volatile, consistent with the reduction in support pricing.  Similarly, in the Netherlands, the increasing price trend ended in the late 1980s.  Milk prices in Australia increased through the 1980s and plateaued in the 1990s. However, with the recent super market price wars, the price for milk in Australia has been extremely volatile.  New Zealand has seen a trend of higher prices and increased volatility, with some similarity to Australia.

Say Good- Bye to Supply Management - figure 1

Figure 1 presents divergences in milk pricing, using the U.S. as a reference.  The chart plots monthly P5 Eastern Milk Pool27 (Canada) blend milk prices versus U.S. Federal Order blend prices for New York/New Jersey and for the Upper Midwest since 1997.  Milk prices in Canada are generally much higher than those in the U.S. Over that period, the eastern Canadian price averaged $C63.05/hl, while the U.S. Midwest price averaged $C39.42/hl and New York/New Jersey averaged $C44.31/hl.  Moreover, because U.S. milk prices are much more volatile than those in Canada, the price differential is commonly wider than these averages suggest.  For example, the price spread between eastern Canada and the Upper Midwest U.S. has frequently exceeded $C40/hl— more than the average value of the Upper Midwest price itself. (Read more: Canada’s Supply-Managed Dairy Policy: How Do We Compare?)

The key advantage that Canadian producers have enjoyed over its peer countries is that fluid milk markets are characterized by seasonality that creates surpluses, which are diverted to industrial milk markets and thus result in lower industrial milk prices.  Sudden losses of export markets exacerbate domestic surpluses and depress milk prices.  Under persistent surpluses, with their associated inequities and low returns to farmers, the initial response is to mitigate adjustment through 27 The P5 Eastern Milk Pool is an interprovincial pooling agreement among Canada’s eastern provinces (Ontario, Quebec, Nova Scotia, New Brunswick, and Prince Edward Island) mandated pooling systems and more interventionist policies, such as price supports, product surplus removal programs, and production quotas.  These are eventually reduced or eliminated due to their cost burden.  The industry then adjusts, resulting in market growth.  Canada has not experienced the same pressures to reduce or eliminate interventionist policy that its peer countries have, so Canada continues to use certain approaches that its peers have dropped.  Nevertheless, industry adjustment has occurred in Canada, but without the market growth seen elsewhere.

Therefore, while Canada has not seen the growth that other world markets have, it also has not seen the extreme volatility that those other markets experience.  This stability is very much appreciated by Canadian milk producers, despite the high cost of entry and production (Quota, and Quota financing costs).

The World is Changing!

After 30 years in a supply management system the UK has now abandoned it.  Moreover, the EU as a whole is pushing for other countries to remove supply management as well.  (Read more: Canada May Drop Cheese Tariffs to Access EU Beef Market and Canada’s dairy farmers ‘angered and disappointed’ by EU trade deal that would double cheese imports).  This is causing great pressure for Canada to follow suit.  As the Canadian government seeks to open trade for all industries, especially Oil, Lumber and Beef, that access often comes at a cost. In Canada’s case that cost is opening up the Canadian dairy market.  More competition will mean that Canada’s high milk costs will have to go down thus decreasing the net return to producers.  While I don’t foresee the abolishment of the quota system immediately, it will happen.  As Canada opens up its markets to the world, that means that the Canadian government will have to further subsidize the milk price or allow the milk price to drop.  As the Canadian government is already running tight on its fiscal position, they are not likely to subsidize this system for very long.

While no one is arguing the benefits that supply management has had for the Canadian dairy farmer, that protection has come at a cost.  One of the greatest costs that I don’t think many realize is that it has allowed many producers to become complacent about their operations.  They have not been forced to be as efficient as possible.  Those that have been the most complacent are the ones who are going to feel the greatest hurt as Canada continues to open up access to world markets.  For those Canadian dairy farmers who think that the Canadian government will protect them till the end….what about the beef farmers, lumber and oil industry?  How can the Canadian government afford to protect and grow the market for all of them?  Everything has a price. (Read more: Save Frank & Marjorie Meyers Farm – The Army Is At The Gate & This Farmers Number Is Up!)

As a clarification point, while supply management as we know it is threatened, there is no question that the Canadian government is committed to a strong domestic agricultural industry.  Many other countries, including the European Union and the United States enact policies that subsidize (directly or indirectly) domestic production. This is something Canada does not currently do.  As the world market evolves, the Canadian system may have to move toward global markets and away from supply management.  It is also important to note that Canada gives more access to imported products than many other countries give in any single sector. Canada currently imports over 6% of the market for dairy products and more than 7.5% for poultry.  In contrast, the United States gives only 2.75% access to their market for dairy products and Europe offers a mere 0.5% for poultry. These will all be areas that will be addressed as world trade evolves.

The Bullvine Bottom Line

The world is rapidly moving to a free market economy.  This highly market oriented system will mean that those producers who can produce milk the most cost effectively will excel and those that are not efficient will perish.  Canada and its quota system that has done an amazing job at protecting its producers are most likely to be the hardest hit by these global forces.  Producers that are looking to the next generation need to seriously evaluate their operations and become as efficient as possible as fast as possible.  The message is clear.  Canada will be saying goodbye to the current supply management system.

 

Get original “Bullvine” content sent straight to your email inbox for free.

 

Glen McNeil: Communication, Common Sense and Respect for the Speed Bumps Delivers Holstein Leadership

So much about dairying in North America is in a state flux, that it is reassuring when people are willing to take leadership roles.  Glen McNeil, the Immediate Past President of Holstein Canada, demonstrated his commitment to Holsteins and leaves the position still committed to continuous improvement of the industry and hopeful for changes ahead. “There will be speed bumps that give us a reality check and that is called balance and experience.” But overall he is positive. “People seek, adapt and embrace change at different stages. Developing proactive policies and direction on an ongoing basis is the responsibility of the Board of Directors as is due diligence…”  This doesn’t mean he sees the world through rose-coloured glasses. “The constant degree and speed of change, and the methods of communication that are being used today mean that everything becomes super fast paced.”  Adapting to the times and respect for the people on all sides of an issue has worked well for Glen.

Barn to the Board Room – Respect for the Roots

gm2Glen has great respect for people in the barn and in the Board Room. It has served him well and been returned to him. He highlights his experiences while at the Holstein Canada Board table. “This enriching experience at the Board table has helped me develop an attitude of respect towards people and their opinions. People remember how you treat them and how you make them feel, longer than what you said. The most important ingredient of success is knowing how to get along with people.”

Getting the basics right about people and developing cow knowledge skills has been important to Glen. He looks to those who influenced him early on. ” My parents taught me work ethic, morals, respect and care of livestock. Dave Houck (Romandale Farms) taught me the art of breeding including aAa. Dave introduced me to Bill Weeks from Vermont, Frank Phister of Mexico, and many great Holstein enthusiasts worldwide. Earl Osborne, Bill Grieve and Pascal Lemire, all Past Presidents of Holstein Canada, were great leaders that inspired me.”

The Triple Excellent Heather Holme Team

The team of Glen and Vanda took over ownership of Heather Holme in 1977 and they have always focused on “the vital importance of developing positive relationships with family, employees, clients, and suppliers to our business.” Attention to detail has helped the McNeils to bring out the best in their cows. Having won three Master Breeder Shields is a unique and rare achievement. It is always amazing that those who reach these heights make the success sound simple. Glen has a four point philosophy.  “Sire selection and animal care on a day to day basis is paramount! Consistently using elite breed improving sires in complimentary matings for generations is vital. We use our classification information and aAa in every mating. We avoid incorporating inferior genetics. “ Simple but true. And yet it goes beyond genetics to the people involved. The McNeils praise each team member on-farm at Heather Holme or through their service suppliers for the expertise that they contribute to the overall success.

(L) Heather Holme R Josee EX 4E (C) Heather Holme Gibson Jolene EX 2E (R) Heather Holme Golden Jewel VG

(L) Heather Holme R Josee EX 4E
(C) Heather Holme Gibson Jolene EX 2E
(R) Heather Holme Golden Jewel VG

The World Wide Excellence of Canadian Holsteins

Glen is equally emphatic about his commitment to Canadian Holsteins and their role.  “There is not a country in the developed world that is short of milk or we would not have the milk price issues that are as evident as they are today in so many countries. Canada needs to continue to breed a balanced dairy cow that can sustain the high production to enable them to express their genetic potential over a lifetime to increase profitability. Every dairyman in the world wants trouble free, profitable cows, with the correct conformation to withstand the high production that today’s dairy cow is capable of producing.”  A big order but one Glen is confident can be achieved.

Holstein Canada CEO Ann Louise and President Glen McNeil share their Canadian "hockey" heritage with Irish and Finnish #2012WHC Participants!

Glen McNeil and Holstein Canada CEO Ann Louise share their Canadian “hockey” heritage with Irish and Finnish 2012 World Holstein Conference Participants!

Achieving More Close to Home Too

With the pressures on all organizations to provide relevant and needed services to its members, The Bullvine asked for Glen’s thoughts on Holstein Field Services “Field Service is just that, an extension service to our members to communicate to and educate our dairies on the profitability opportunities with registration, classification, milk recording, genome testing, etc. The pricing model for services must be flexible and will evolve as more dairies see the advantages of these services. Communications in different forms is paramount today.”

The Next Turn in the Road

Having seen the Holstein industry from various viewpoints, Glen shares his perspective. “I have tremendous respect and faith in our youth involved in the dairy business at many different levels. In having the opportunity to travel worldwide I have great appreciation for supply management in Canada.” New opportunities will present themselves with all the hills and valleys that progress demands.  McNeil knows it will take willingness to change. “We would never consider using the same sires that we used 20 years ago, or farm the same way, feed or manage our cows the way we did 20 years ago. Common sense and understanding what Genomics can and cannot do will be very revealing in the next 2-3 years.”

Holstein Canada CEO Ann Louise Carson, President Glen McNeil, and Board member Mario Perrault were very pleased to recently attend the All-European Championship Show in Fribourg, Switzerland

Glen McNeil and Holstein Canada CEO Ann Louise Carson, Mario Perrault were attending the All-European Championship Show in Fribourg, Switzerland. The traditional alpine horns in the picture are played in the Swiss Alps.

“One Door Closes. Another Opens.”

History will continue to be written at Heather Holme where one theme they have built on is that “challenges are also opportunities”. Glen welcomes the changes opening up in his schedule. “I am fortunate to be able to return to our farm on a more regular basis than I have for a few years to assist Curtis and Vanda as required and spend more valuable time with our family”. No doubt there will be new evolutions ahead. It is noteworthy that the McNeils are using Facebook to share their ideas and to market their cattle by almost daily updates. Look for the McNeils to have and sell healthy cattle as they have maintained their CHAH (disease free) Herd status when others found it an expense rather than an investment.

Curtis and our Herdsman Greg Feagan, Greg has been working with us for 31 years.

Son Curtis and herdsman Greg Feagan, Greg has been working with Heather Holme for 31 years.

The Bullvine Bottom Line

The McNeils at Heather Holme believe in taking good stock and best practices, making them better and getting results. Adapting to and changing with the times has built their success. Glen looks to the future with the same equanimity that has served both Heather Holme and Holstein Canada well. “Change is inevitable and desirable. Adapt and harness new technologies to continue to be profitable and competitive and learn how to adapt to change. “We applaud McNeil for his dedication, vision and commitment.  It smoothes out the speed bumps so that Glen can confidently declare. “The future is bright for Holstein Canada and the Canadian dairy industry!”

 

Get original “Bullvine” content sent straight to your email inbox for free.

 

Send this to a friend