USDA freezes billions in energy grants as dairy farms scramble to salvage plans. Contracts are broken, farmers are suing, and your operation could be next.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: In a stunning development that threatens dairy operations nationwide, the Trump administration has frozen billions in agricultural grants funded by the Inflation Reduction Act, prompting five farms and three non-profits to file a federal lawsuit challenging the government’s authority to withhold committed funds. The freeze particularly impacts dairy farms counting on Rural Energy for America Program (REAP) grants to slash their $35,000-$50,000 annual energy costs through solar installations and efficient cooling systems—funds that Secretary Rollins’ recent $20 million release expressly excluded. While the legal battle unfolds in Washington, dairy operators face immediate financial consequences, with small farms potentially losing $15,000-25,000 in promised energy savings and more extensive operations facing competitive disadvantages in global markets. Industry advocates, including the former USDA Under Secretary who warns of likely farmer victory in court, are demanding the administration honor existing contracts while conducting its funding review—a precedent established when the Obama administration lost a similar case in 2013.
KEY TAKEAWAYS:
- A federal judge ruled on February 25 that the administration’s blanket funding freeze “exceeded constitutional authority,” yet the USDA continues withholding funds for approximately 6,000 REAP grants under review.
- For dairy operations, energy costs represent a significant operational expense—milk cooling alone accounts for 25% of electricity use—making the frozen REAP grants critical to maintaining competitiveness through 40-75% energy savings.
- Farmers who win REAP grants but have contracts frozen should immediately document all communications with USDA, consult with legal counsel about joining potential litigation, and connect with their state dairy associations to advocate for funding release.
- States like Arkansas, Minnesota, and Missouri could each lose over $400 million in agricultural funding if the freeze continues, with dairy-heavy states like Wisconsin, New York, and California facing disproportionate impacts.
- The administration has not provided specific examples of misallocated funds nor explained why previously approved contracts must remain frozen during the review, despite precedent from a 2013 case where farmers successfully sued the government over broken agreements.
Just days ago, a coalition of farmers and non-profit organizations took the gloves off and filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration, directly challenging what they describe as an illegal withholding of Department of Agriculture grants funded by the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA). This isn’t some minor bureaucratic spat—it’s a full-blown crisis for thousands of farmers who had USDA commitments in hand, only to watch them vanish overnight.
The USDA has frozen a sweeping range of grants while conducting what they’re calling an “agency-wide spending review”—putting money that Congress already appropriated for conservation and other critical farm programs on hold. A recent University of Illinois-Urbana Champaign study revealed the accurate scale of what’s at stake: farmers will lose $12.5 billion nationwide if lawmakers roll back remaining IRA funding.
Has your operation been affected by the IRA funding freeze? What commitments were you counting on that are now in limbo?
“A deal is a deal. A contract is a contract.” — Robert Bonnie, former USDA Under Secretary of Farm Production and Conservation.
DAIRY FARMS CAUGHT IN THE CROSSFIRE: ENERGY COST NIGHTMARE
While the lawsuit doesn’t specifically name dairy operations among the plaintiffs, make no mistake—the ripple effects through agricultural funding streams hit dairy farmers squarely in the pocketbook. Energy costs represent one of modern dairy farms’ most significant operational expenses, with milk cooling alone accounting for 25% of on-farm electricity use. According to USDA Agricultural Research Service research, vacuum pumps for milking systems consume another 20%, with lighting and ventilation taking another massive bite out of profits.
A 2023 study published in the Journal of Dairy Science found that conventional milk cooling systems are neither cost-effective nor energy-efficient. They rely on bulky piping, mechanical compressors, and refrigerants like Freon and Ammonia, which contribute to global warming. These traditional cooling methods are particularly burdensome for smaller dairy operations, where the high energy demand significantly drains already-thin margins.
DAIRY ENERGY COST BREAKDOWN:
- Milk cooling: 25% of electricity costs
- Vacuum pumps: 20% of electricity costs
- Lighting: 15% of electricity costs
- Ventilation: 15% of electricity costs
- Other equipment: 25% of electricity costs
According to Penn State Extension, energy costs for a 200-cow dairy farm typically run $35,000-$50,000 annually. The now-frozen REAP grants could dramatically reduce these expenses, which would have funded energy-efficient alternatives like thermoelectric cooling systems that are more economical for small to mid-sized operations.
What alternative energy solutions are you exploring if your REAP funding doesn’t materialize?
THE LAWSUIT: FARMERS FIGHTING BACK AGAINST BROKEN PROMISES
The lawsuit, filed by Earthjustice on behalf of five farms from Maryland, Massachusetts, and Mississippi, along with three non-profit organizations, pulls no punches in calling out what they view as constitutional overreach. Among the plaintiffs is Elisa Lane of Two Boots Farm, who invested thousands of dollars in preliminary work for solar installations based on firm USDA commitments—money now hanging in limbo.
“This is not government efficiency. It is thoughtless waste that inflicts unwarranted financial pain on small farmers and organizations trying to improve their communities.” — Hana Vizcarra, senior attorney at Earthjustice.
“When we signed that contract, we believed the government would honor its word,” Lane said. “Now we’re left wondering if we’ll have to choose between paying for this solar system or feed and supplies.”
WHAT’S REALLY AT STAKE: BEYOND THE LEGAL ARGUMENTS
The legal challenge argues that the Trump administration violates the Constitution’s separation of powers and the Administrative Procedure Act. There’s precedent for farmers winning these battles. Robert Bonnie, the former USDA Under Secretary, points to a 2013 case in which the Obama administration was successfully sued after failing to honor contracts during a government shutdown.
“During the shutdown in 2013, I was part of the Obama administration. At that time, because we had a shutdown, we could not follow through on many contracts during the shutdown period. There was litigation, and we lost,” Bonnie warns.
[IMAGE: Modern milk cooling system with energy efficiency technology – Caption: Energy-efficient cooling systems can reduce electricity costs by up to 40%, a critical advantage for dairy operations facing razor-thin margins]
THE BROADER IMPACT ON DAIRY’S FUTURE: $12.5 BILLION AT RISK
While Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins announced on February 21 that USDA would release $20 million for three specific conservation programs (Environmental Quality Incentive Program, Conservation Stewardship Program, and Agricultural Conservation Easement Program), this represents just a drop in the bucket compared to the $12.5 billion in IRA conservation funds still in limbo.
Secretary Rollins has defended the review, stating that the Biden administration “rushed out hundreds of millions of dollars of IRA funding that was supposed to be distributed over eight years” and that some funding “went to programs that had nothing to do with agriculture.” While ensuring proper fund allocation is essential, the administration has not provided specific examples of misallocated funds nor explained why previously approved contracts must be frozen during the review process.
Critically, this initial funding release did not include the Rural Energy for America Program, which is vital to dairy operations’ energy cost management.
“Everybody wants to do away with waste, fraud, and abuse, but that’s not happening right now. They’re doing away with staff and programs important to rural America.” —Former USDA Under Secretary Robert Bonnie.
States like Arkansas, Minnesota, and Missouri could each lose more than $400 million for IRA programs—funds that would have directly benefited dairy operations through conservation and energy efficiency improvements that boost bottom-line profits.
Should the administration prioritize honoring existing contracts while reviewing future funding? Let us know your thoughts.
WHAT THIS MEANS FOR YOUR DAIRY OPERATION: DIRECT IMPACT ASSESSMENT
| Farm Size | Potential Impact | Recommended Action |
| Small Dairy (<100 cows) | $15,000-25,000 in lost REAP savings for energy upgrades; reduced capacity to implement efficiency measures | Document all communications with USDA; connect with local Farm Bureau representatives |
| Mid-Size Dairy (100-500 cows) | $25,000-75,000 in lost REAP opportunities; delayed solar or equipment upgrades | Join forces with state dairy associations advocating for funding release; explore alternative financing |
| Large Dairy (500+ cows) | $75,000+ in lost energy efficiency opportunities; significant competitive disadvantage | Consider legal options for signed contracts; implement phased approach to energy improvements |
The impact is especially dire for New York’s dairy industry, which ranks fifth in U.S. dairy production, with over 620,000 dairy cows producing more than 15 billion pounds of milk annually. Many of these operations were counting on IRA funds to implement energy-efficient solutions that would help reduce their greenhouse gas emission intensity, currently averaging 0.86 kg CO2eq per kg of fat and protein-corrected milk, according to research published in the Journal of Dairy Science.
THE ROAD AHEAD: 5 ACTION STEPS FOR DAIRY PRODUCERS
While the court battles play out in Washington, dairy producers can’t afford to wait for a resolution. Take these immediate steps:
- Document everything: If you’ve received any USDA funding commitments, maintain meticulous records of all communications and expenses
- Join forces: Connect with your state dairy association and the American Farm Bureau Federation, which has already stated that “the freezing of funds created uncertainty for farmers.”
- Develop Plan B: Identify alternative financing for critical energy efficiency improvements that cannot wait for a government funding resolution.
- Push for accountability: Contact your congressional representatives demanding USDA’s funding release schedule oversight.
- Prepare for litigation: If you have signed contracts, consult with legal counsel about joining potential class-action lawsuits.
Has the funding freeze impacted your dairy operation? Share your experience in the comments section below.
THE BOTTOM LINE: FARMERS DESERVE BETTER THAN BROKEN PROMISES
The stunning reality is that farmers are being forced to sue their government to make it honor commitments already approved and funded by Congress. This isn’t a partisan issue—it’s about the fundamental reliability of programs that dairy producers have built their business plans around.
“American farmers and ranchers are the backbone of our nation. They feed, fuel, and clothe our nation—and millions of people worldwide.” — Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins.
For dairy operations already battling volatile milk prices, labor shortages, and rising input costs, having the rug pulled out from under vital cost-saving investments doesn’t just mean delayed projects—it means lost competitiveness in global markets where every cent per hundredweight matters.
National Farmers Union President Rob Larew has called on “USDA to fulfill all previously signed contracts quickly”—and dairy producers should accept nothing less. The Bullvine will continue monitoring this developing story, bringing you the latest on how this funding freeze affects dairy operations nationwide and how you can protect your farm’s financial future.
TIMELINE: IRA FUNDING FREEZE
- August 2022: Inflation Reduction Act passed, allocating billions for agricultural programs
- January 20, 2025: Trump administration issues “Unleashing American Energy” executive order
- January 29, 2025: OMB directs all federal agencies to pause the disbursement of IRA funds
- February 21, 2025: Agriculture Secretary Rollins announces release of $20 million for three conservation programs
- February 25, 2025: Federal judge rules blanket funding freeze “exceeded constitutional authority”
- March 11, 2025: Former USDA Under Secretary Bonnie warns of litigation if contracts aren’t honored
- March 13, 2025: Farmers and non-profits file lawsuit challenging the continued funding freeze
While politicians and bureaucrats debate funding technicalities, real dairy farmers face real consequences. And neither side of the political aisle should find that acceptable.
LEARN MORE:
- Dairy Business Innovation Freeze: 420 Operations Left in Financial Limbo as WCMA Fights Back
- Senator Baldwin Demands Action: Letter to Ag Secretary Rollins Calls for Immediate Release of Dairy Innovation Funds
- Wisconsin Cheese Makers Head to DC: $6.5 Million in Promised Reimbursements Hang in Balance for 88 Dairy Businesses
Join the Revolution!
Join the Revolution!Join over 30,000 successful dairy professionals who rely on Bullvine Daily for their competitive edge. Delivered directly to your inbox each week, our exclusive industry insights help you make smarter decisions while saving precious hours every week. Never miss critical updates on milk production trends, breakthrough technologies, and profit-boosting strategies that top producers are already implementing. Subscribe now to transform your dairy operation’s efficiency and profitability—your future success is just one click away.
