![]()
Explore the ongoing Canada dairy trade dispute. Is Canada failing to comply with trade rules? Trade Minister Todd McClay weighs in.
In September last year, a significant turn of events on the global dairy trade stage took place. New Zealand came out as the victor in a trade dispute, arguing that Canada was obstructing dairy exporters’ access to its market, thereby breaching an agreed-upon treaty. The proceedings were initiated by New Zealand due to Canada’s non-compliance with the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP) rules.
“A CPTPP arbitration panel ruled in New Zealand’s favour”, shares our source.
Canada had until Wednesday to alter its administration of tariff rate quotas to eradicate prioritizing its domestic industry, and to open doors for exporters to capitalize fully on the market access that had been negotiated in good faith between Canada and New Zealand. However, Trade Minister Todd McClay highlights that the tariff alterations Canada disclosed on Thursday still contravene the ruling.
In a spirited declaration, McClay pointedly expressed Canada’s refusal to yield fully to a CPTPP trade dispute ruling over dairy trade as cynical. He highlighted that New Zealand had no aspiration to back down.
“Canada’s ongoing failure to meet its legal commitments is disappointing, but we have no intention of giving in on this. We back our exporters and we will defend hard-won free trade agreement commitments. New Zealand supports trade rules and takes seriously its obligations to trade partners. We expect others to show us the same courtesy.”
Minister McClay has requested urgent legal advice on the next best steps to take. He emphasized that the Canadian government still had an opportunity to fulfill its obligations to New Zealand, both in the spirit and substance of the agreement.
Subsequently, ACT Party trade spokesperson Dr Parmjeet Parmar had strong words regarding Canada’s stance. She labelled it a “betrayal of our friendship”.
“It’s hard to think of two countries with warmer relations than New Zealand and Canada. Our shared history and cultural similarities ought to be the basis of a close, good-faith relationship. But on trade, Canada is shutting us out. Canada signed the CPTPP, knowing their exporters would benefit from reduced barriers to trade. But free trade is meant to go both ways,”
Dr Parmar advocated that if Canada could not comply, it should face the consequences and be “booted out of the deal”.
Unpacking the Canada Dairy Trade Dispute
When you dive into the history of dairy trade disputes between trading nations, you’ll find that these conflicts are a recurring theme. The crux of the issue for Canada lies in its free trade agreements with countries like the United Statesand New Zealand. The sticking point? Dairy trade. This seemingly unassuming topic has proven to be a bone of contention for decades.
One current and contentious dispute is the USMCA dairy TRQ (Tariff Rate Quota) problem. Just last year, in 2021, Canada found itself in hot water as the United States challenged its dairy TRQ allocation measures. Such disagreements aren’t unique to the US either, as New Zealand took a similar stance, initiating dispute settlement proceedings against Canada under the CPTPP (Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership) pertaining to the same issue of dairy TRQs allocation.
It’s important to note that despite these disputes, Canada’s dairy industry and its supply management system still enjoy firm backing. Figures like Trade Minister Mary Ng and Agriculture Minister Lawrence MacAuley continue to champion it. Even in the face of the rejected US claim against Canada’s dairy market restrictions by the USMCA dispute panel, efforts to support the industry and adhere to international trade agreements continue.
For instance, following the Panel Report, Global Affairs Canada took steps to amend its dairy TRQ allocation measures. However, this move sparked another request for consultations from the United States. Clearly, despite amendments, tensions remain high.
The gravity of these disputes should not be underestimated. Should these challenges prove successful, they may increase competition between Canadian and US dairy processors. US processors have struggled to obtain TRQ allocations to export processed dairy products at preferential duty rates to Canadian purchasers, injecting an additional layer of complexity into the situation. Meanwhile, New Zealand also poses a significant threat. Its challenge to Canada’s dairy supply management system adds pressure, creating a multifaceted dilemma that Canada must now navigate.
Behind the Non-Compliance Allegations: An Investigation
Diving deeper into the allegations, there appears to be a complex web of non-compliance accusations directed towards Canada. Their alleged failure to adhere to trade rules has not only come under scrutiny from Trade Minister Todd McClay, but has landed them into a dispute settlement proceeding instigated by New Zealand under the CPTPP (Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership). The bone of contention here revolves around Canada’s administration of dairy Tariff Rate Quotas (TRQs).
New Zealand, a significant player in global diary industry, maintains that Canada’s measures for administering TRQs are seemingly inconsistent with the policies outlined in the CPTPP. The main issue lies in the fact that Canada has been accused of administering these quotas in a manner that restricts the exporting opportunities for overseas dairy producers, a move contradicting the basic tenets of free trade principles.
Moreover, the Compliance Panel’s verdict in this dispute has also added fuel to the ongoing fire. According to their findings, Canada has been providing export subsidies that exceed the quantity commitment levels, particularly for cheese exports. This raised eyebrows within the international community as it appeared to undermine the essence of the Agreement on Agriculture’s under Article 9.1(c). Despite Canada’s appeal to these findings, the Appellate Body reversed the compliance panel’s rulings on subsidies financed by governmental action.
But the brouhaha doesn’t end there. Just beyond Canadian borders, the United States has experienced its own scuffle with Canada over similar concerns. Mexico, another USMCA (United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement) member, is grappling with similar allegations. They’re under scrutiny for reportedly blocking private companies from operating renewable energy facilities and other energy-related activities by delaying or denying necessary permit applications.
In essence, the persisting trade disputes surrounding Canada are emblematic of a larger issue at hand – the harmony and fairness in global trade operations. Upholding international trade agreements is fundamental to ensuring a healthy and stable global economy, so it’s essential that each country honors their commitment, lest they face similar charges.
Breaking Down the Disputed Dairy Trade Regulations
Imagine trying to navigate the complex world of international trade, particularly when it comes to dairy commodities. Over the years, disagreements over the dairy trade have put the United States and Canada in a long-standing tussle. To simply put, these two nations just can’t seem to agree on the rules of the game. The current conflict hangs around the way Canada administers its dairy Tariff Rate Quotas (TRQs) – a point of contention that has sparked another, albeit smaller, trade war.
So, why are these TRQs causing such a tigmotaxis? They are essentially a two-tiered tariff system that applies to countries with a quota – a certain quantity of a product which can be imported at lower tariffs. The issue lies in how these TRQs are allocated by Canada, which, according to the US and New Zealand, is in direct violation of the terms laid out in the U.S-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) and the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP), respectively.
The US dairy industry was startled when the USMCA dispute panel rejected their charges against Canada’s dairy market restrictions in 2021. The ruling, as per Krysta Harden of the U.S Dairy Export Council, set an alarming precedent that could potentially damage the industry. On the flip side, the Global Affairs Canada amended its dairy TRQ allocation measures following the Panel Report, leading to yet another request for trade negotiations from the U.S.
Why does this matter? Well, because if the U.S wins these challenges, it may usher in an era of increased competition between Canadian and U.S dairy processors. Likewise, it could mean that U.S processors, who were failing to obtain TRQ allocations, would gain the ability to export processed dairy products at preferential duty rates to Canadian purchasers. Needless to say, the stakes are high.
It’s crucial to remember that behind these trade skirmishes is a deep-rooted defense of national interests. For instance, Canada’s dairy industry, and its supply management system is bolstered by the support of Trade Minister Mary Ng and Agriculture Minister Lawrence MacAuley. Amidst these challenges, actions such as these reveal the complexities and nuances involved when it comes to negotiating dairy trade amid competing economic interests.
The Bottom Line
At the heart of the matter, it’s clear to see that the implications of this protracted Canada-U.S. dairy trade dispute stretch far beyond just the realm of dairy. With billions of dollars at stake, and the livelihoods of producers hanging in the balance, the contested regulations have wide-ranging impacts on economic stability and international relations. The consensus from experts predicts that a successful outcome for Canada could notably enhance competition between the nations’ dairy processors. Although the prospects are daunting, it’s heartening to see that any victories won by Canada on this front will likely deliver a significant boost to their auto manufacturing sector. Let’s continue to follow this critical trade dispute, as it remains a key indicator of the health and future direction of North American trade relations.
