As we gear up for the summer months, brace yourself for a sizzling season ahead. According to forecasts from the USDA Midwest Climate Hub, Dr. Dennis Todey warns of above-average temperatures dominating much of the country from July through September. Todey’s insights, shared during a webinar sponsored by the Iowa Farm Bureau Federation, signal a notable shift in weather patterns. 

The western third of the nation, excluding parts of California’s coast along with the upper New England states, is predicted to face particularly intense heat. While the mercury level soars, precipitation forecasts remain neutral for most regions. However, a swath along the eastern seaboard may experience above-average rainfall, which could serve as some relief from the scorching temperatures. 

The impending change in weather is attributed to a rapid transition from the current El Niño pattern to a La Niña phase, expected to kick in between June and August 2024. This shift follows a brief El Niño period that brought unusually mild winters, particularly evident in states like North Dakota, Minnesota, and New York. 

However, the flip to La Niña raises concerns, especially for regions already grappling with drought conditions. States like Iowa have been in a moderate drought since July 2021, with pockets of extreme and exceptional drought in areas like Montana, New Mexico, and Texas. The uncertainty surrounding precipitation patterns highlights the importance of timely rainfall throughout the summer months. 

“While temperatures are extending growing seasons by about 10 days per decade, there’s been a concerning trend of mid-summer dryness over the past 20 years, with more rainfall occurring in the spring.”
– Dr. Dennis Todey

As farmers prepare for the planting season, Dr. Todey offers practical advice to navigate these challenging conditions: 

• Adjust yield goals considering potential moisture limitations.
• Optimize planting timing to capitalize on spring moisture.
• Minimize tillage to preserve soil moisture.
• Monitor water sources closely for livestock and irrigation, preparing contingency plans if needed.

As the summer draws near, it’s imperative for our agricultural communities to prepare for the heat and adapt their practices accordingly to minimize potential impacts on crops and livestock.

Thrilling news coming in from the livestock market, as we’re witnessing a notable surge in calf values, meanwhile, the prices for springers are cruising at a steady pace. Both these trends are mirroring interesting adjustments in supply and demand within our robust dairy industry. For you, our diligent producers who are continually steering their vessels through the tides of fluctuating market conditions and evolving consumer preferences, understanding these trends comes off as a paramount aspect. It’s through such knowledge that you can make informed decisions and maximize profitability. 

Welcome to an era where calf prices are hitting the stratosphere. Newborn beef-cross bottle calves are now selling for up to a whopping $1,000 per head, a trend that’s fast gaining momentum throughout the United States. Yet that’s not where the sun sets. Dairy heifer calves have not been left behind in this wave of significant improvements, with prices now floating between the $300 and $400 per head mark. It’s a bullish leap considering they were averaging $75-$150 per head just a year ago.

“Holstein springer prices are holding steady, sometimes inching slightly higher than last month. Interestingly, they are either skirting around or exceeding the cost of production in most parts of the nation”

When viewed keenly, this surge in calf values and consistent springer prices are, in essence, a reflection of the intricate interplay of supply and demand forces within the dairy industry’s landscape. By keeping informed and maintaining a proactive stance, you, our committed producers, can strategically position yourselves to leverage these market opportunities while effectively surfing the waves of associated challenges. In doing so, you are ensuring not only the long-term sustainability of your operations but also incremental profitability.

Kathleen “Kaye” Miller, age 89, of Orangeville, Illinois, passed away peacefully at home surrounded by her loving family on Saturday, April 6, 2024. She was born Kathleen Bertha Miltimore in Sweetsburg, Quebec, Canada on January 23, 1935, to Walter and Evelyn (Wright) Miltimore.

Kaye’s family started the Miltimore Telephone Company in Iron Hill, Quebec. The men in the family installed the lines and equipment, and Kaye and her four sisters, along with their grandmother, ran the switchboard in the family home. At age 16, she went to work at Sweetsburg Hospital. When the hospital installed its first switchboard in 1951, Kaye trained the staff on how to operate it. Later in life, she retained her gift for memorizing numbers and was often referred to as a “walking telephone book.”

She met her high school sweetheart, Bob, (Robert Charles Miller of Brome Centre, Quebec) at a church social, where he was impressed with her softball skills. They were married on October 12, 1954, in Sweetsburg (now Cowansville), Quebec. Bob was recruited to be the herd manager at Ravenglen Farm in Antioch, Illinois in 1956. So, Kaye and daughter Wendy traveled by train to her new home in the U.S. on her 21st birthday. Son Craig was born less than three weeks later.

Kaye and her husband started their family farm, Mil-R-Mor, in 1962 in the Huntley/Dundee, Illinois area, where they thrived for nearly 50 years. In 2006, they relocated the farm and family to Orangeville, Illinois. Kaye was the backbone of her husband’s farming career. Together, they raised registered Holstein dairy cattle. Bob gives Kaye credit for encouraging him to buy a cow named C Glenridge Citation Roxy in 1974. Roxy would later go on to be one of the most famous cows around the globe, being named International Cow of the Century and Queen of the Breed.

Kaye loved traveling, often to see family back in Canada, or to various Holstein events with Bob and the family. She was an expert at canning and preserving produce to feed her family. Once during a local milk strike to protest low prices, she made over 500 pounds of butter while others poured their milk on the fields.

Throughout Kaye and Bob’s life, they enjoyed dancing and music. As teenagers, they attended many dances at the Brome Pond Dance Hall. Most recently, they enjoyed dancing at Turner Hall and the Best Dam Bar two or three times each week. Kaye loved playing cards and always made time for a round of pinochle or 500 with family and friends. She cherished family time, especially the hours spent with her 16 grandchildren and 24 great-grandchildren.

Kaye was a mother to many more than she bore, treating them all as her own. She touched so many lives, teaching us all about love, life, and especially being kind. Her actions exemplified the importance of pitching in and being helpful to others. She treated everyone she met like family.

Kathleen is survived by her husband and partner in life, Robert; five children: Wendy (Ardishir) Rashidi, Marshall Craig (Beverly) Miller, Madeline (Stephen) Schultz, Crystal (John) Sheehan and Kathryn Miller; grandchildren: Aryan Rashidi, Arjang (Mackenzie) Rashidi, Charles (Jennifer) Schultz, David (Amy) Schultz, Lorilee Schultz, Kelly (Robert) Foerder, Peter (Katelyn) Schultz, Arisa (Eric) Conwell, John “Jay” (Jessica) Sheehan, Mark (Kegan) Schultz, Atisa (Dylan) Rashidi, Sarah (Adam) Roth, Ryan Sheehan, Brianna Sheehan, Kaylen Miller, and Emily Sheehan; and great-grandchildren: Ashlynn Schultz, Jaxson Rashidi, Sawyer Rashidi, Ryder Rashidi, Blair Schultz, Reid Foerder, John “Jack”  Sheehan, Brantley Schultz, Cora Schultz, Elsie Foerder, Fynlie Rashidi, Evelynn Sheehan, Braelynn Schultz, Henry Sheehan, Harvey Roth, Quinn Conwell, Averly Rashidi, Magnus Sheehan, Adeline Foerder, Charles Roth, Lucy (Schultz) Fahr, Luke Schultz, Adalyn Conwell, and little Levi Schultz. Kaye is survived by her dear sister Barbara Miltimore, as well as many nieces and nephews.

She was preceded in death by her daughter, Deborah, on October 25, 1964, who died in a farming accident; her parents; an infant brother, Richard; and three sisters: Grace, Shirley, and Norma.

A visitation will take place from 2:00-7:00 p.m. on Thursday, April 11, 2024, at the United Methodist Church in Orangeville, Illinois.

A funeral service will take place at 11:00 a.m. on Friday, April 12, 2024, at the United Methodist Church in Orangeville, Illinois, with a visitation prior to the service from 10:00-11:00 a.m.  Interment will take place at Sunset Acres Cemetery, Orangeville, Illinois. A luncheon will follow. Pastor Roger Bronkema will officiate the services.

Memorials may be made to the National Holstein Women’s Scholarship Organization, or to the United Methodist Church in Orangeville, Illinois.

Memorials may be sent to the family at the following :

Leamon Funeral Home
Attn: Kathleen Miller Family
P.O. Box 226
Lena, IL 61048

Obituary can be viewed online here.

As you actively hunt for more farm-to-table products that offer natural ingredients, consider Philadelphia Cream Cheese. The Kraft Heinz is indeed ramping up its commitment to quality. By using their latest advertising campaign, the brand is making a worthwhile effort to promote its longstanding history and connection to real dairy farms. This farm-to-spread campaign is meticulously crafted to strengthen brand awareness through a unique angle—an association with cows. 

“We’ve maintained our status as the cream cheese category leader due to the quality of our product. It’s only fitting that we highlight the key ingredients—fresh milk and real cream—that have kept consumers coming back for generations,” articulated Keenan White, senior brand manager, Philadelphia at Kraft Heinz Company. “Philly fans know a thing or two about the perfect schmear, and this campaign serves as a tangible reminder of this truth. We’re looking to connect to the product experience in a fresh and creatively unexpected way, grounding ourselves in what makes our product so special.”

The campaign isn’t confined to a single channel – it’s finding its way to consumers via a wide array of mediums. The effort is in full swing with mobile billboards running throughout New York City, Chicago, and Los Angeles. Alongside this, the brand is also dabbling with “wild postings” – strategic placements outside delis and bodegas all through New York City. But, it doesn’t stop there. 

• The brand story travels back to its roots with billboards in Fall Creek, Wisconsin—the source of the brand’s milk.
• The campaign also includes traditional billboards in the Chicago market.
• Look out for print ads in the New York Magazine.
• The brand is also making waves online, with a targeted social media push.

Sit back, relax, and watch as Philadelphia Cream Cheese celebrates its unique relationship with its dairy supply—setting a new tone for product marketing. As observed, this humble cream cheese is not just a product, but a lifestyle powered by quality ingredients straight from the farm.

Ever contemplated a celestial event through the eyes of farm animals, specifically dairy cows? Yes, you’ve understood correctly, we’re diving into an unusual yet intriguing subject right here. Does a solar eclipse – a spectacular astronomical event where the moon passes between the Earth and the sun causing a shadow to cast over Earth’s surface – influence the behavior of our milk-producing friends? Intriguing, isn’t it? 

Imagine if you were enjoying your morning grazing or late afternoon cud-chewing, and unexpectedly the day turned into night? Would it confuse you or cause a change in your normal routine? Well, these are the sorts of questions dairy farmers and curiosity-driven souls ask when an eclipse is on the horizon.

You might just discover that there’s more to these cosmic events and bovine behavior than you initially thought. Let’s delve deeper into the science behind a solar eclipse and its potential effects on dairy cows. You’ll be riveted, we promise!

The Celestial Event: A Brief Understanding of Solar Eclipses

Delving deeper into this celestial spectacle, how might it affect our bovine friends, the dairy cows? Historical observations and studies suggest that solar eclipses can indeed influence animal behavior, including birds, mammals, insects, and even plants. The big question we’re exploring here though, is: Will the Solar Eclipse affect Dairy Cows? 

A snapshot from the past: on August 11, 1999, Europe was under the enchanting spell of a solar eclipse. This rare event provided researchers an opportunity to study the effects of this eclipse on grazing animals, specifically dairy cows. The idea was to observe if there was any disruption in their diurnal grazing patterns due to the Solar Eclipse. Sure, anecdotal evidence suggests that animals tend to behave as they would at nightfall, during a solar eclipse – but was this the case for dairy cows as well? 

The total time spent grazing by the cows in the 24 hours following the eclipse, as observed, turned out to be significantly lower than in other 24-hour periods. But correlation doesn’t always mean causation, so was this change in grazing time unusual or merely a cosmic coincidence? 

To break down this conundrum and fill the gaps in our knowledge, the University of Kentucky’s Martin-Gatton College of Agriculture, Food, and Environment initiated a research project in collaboration with livestock owners. By closely observing and recording the behavior of cows during solar eclipses, researchers aim to solve the puzzles of bovine behavior presented by these cosmic events. So, while the jury may still be out on the definitive impact of solar eclipses on our dairy cows, it is an area of study that offers fascinating insights and intriguing possibilities.

Do Solar Eclipses Really Affect Dairy Cows?

Now, you’d think with historical accounts hinting at solar eclipses influencing the behavior of various creatures, dairy cows wouldn’t be an exception, right? Well, let’s dig a little deeper into it, and see what the research says. 

In 1999, a unique celestial event, a total solar eclipse, provided a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity for researchers to study the grazing behavior of ruminants. The angle was to test a hypothesis – that the sudden darkness brought on by a solar eclipse would affect the diurnal grazing patterns of livestock, including dairy cows, as it does with other animals. 

What were the findings, you ask? Interestingly, the study revealed that the solar eclipse had little to no visible effect on the ruminating behavior of these cattle. It seems, unlike other animals such as birds, insects, and even apes, who tend to behave as if it’s nightfall during a solar eclipse, dairy cows are not as easily phased by eclipses. 

Furthermore, in a similar study conducted during a solar eclipse in 2017, researchers noted unusual eclipse-related behavior in 17 species including tortoises moving at an increased pace, giraffes galloping without any apparent threat, and apes modifying their usual vocalization patterns. However, no such peculiar behavior was observed from dairy cows. 

Dr. Overall, a known expert in the field, points that while the abrupt darkness of an eclipse can mess with the internal clocks of animals in a manner akin to how humans are affected by artificial light at night, not all animals are susceptible to these effects. Quick and drastic changes in light intensity may not be enough to trigger significant changes in the routine or behavior of dairy cows. 

However, animal behavior during solar eclipses is an area that still lacks extensive research, particularly when it comes to the grazing behavior of ruminants. Consequently, researchers continue to seek help from livestock owners to observe and record animal behaviors during such celestial events. Who knows what else we might discover given enough observations and studies? 

So next time you’re on a farm during a solar eclipse, keep an eye on those dairy cows. The current consensus might not be the final word – science often surprises us!

Can cows look at the eclipse without going blind?

You’re surely aware of the widespread caution about not looking directly at a solar eclipse without proper eye protection, right? This advice is circulated to protect our human eyes from any detrimental effects. However, when it comes to cows, the matter is slightly different. The critical difference is that cows, unlike humans, do not have a tendency to look up and stare at the sky. So, the risk of eye damage from a solar eclipse is relatively low for them. 

Dr. Karen Overall, a renowned veterinary behaviorist, suggests it’s highly unlikely for bovines to suffer from eclipse-related blindness. She explains that cattle possess a different visual perception compared to humans. Their eyes are primarily designed to detect motion on the ground level, helping them to find food and avoid predators. Therefore, they are not inclined to gaze directly into the sun during an eclipse. 

However, it always proves beneficial to exercise caution. Farmers are advised to keep a close eye on their dairy herds during a solar eclipse, ensuring the animals don’t exhibit any unusual behavior that could indicate stress or discomfort.

Can Solar Eclipses Influence Milk Production in Dairy Cows?

Now, given the unique nature of a solar eclipse, one might wonder what the potential impacts could be on the biological process of milk production in dairy cows. Could this unusual phenomenon cause any observable disruptions or changes? 

At this point, from the evidence available, it seems that a distinct correlation between solar eclipses and dairy milk production has not been firmly established. That’s not to say, however, that it’s not worthy of investigation. After all, we know that dairy cows’ activity levels, feeding habits, and overall behaviors are influenced by numerous external and internal factors, and there just might be a link between solar eclipses and their productive capacities. 

The study conducted in relation to the 1999 solar eclipse, which focused on observing the behavior of dairy cattlebefore, during, and after the eclipse, reported that there was little effect on their ruminating behavior. This suggests that solar eclipses might not necessarily disrupt their grazing patterns – a significant aspect when contemplating the effect on milk production. 

That being said, more research is certainly needed to draw a definitive conclusion. Interestingly, researchers are currently seeking help from livestock owners to record their animals’ behaviors during solar eclipses, in hope of getting a clearer understanding of this intriguing situation. 

Ranald MacFarlane, a farmer from Fernwood, P.E.I., who owns approximately 100 free-ranging pigs and about 90 cows, is an example of an individual curious to understand how solar eclipses may affect his herds, including the potential implications for milk yield. 

Meanwhile, Dr. Karen Overall’s suggestion to put cows in barns or stalls and pamper them with their favorite treats during the eclipse speaks volumes about how precautionary measures could potentially mitigate any unforeseen effects on these animals during this celestial event. 

In conclusion, it’s clear that there’s still a vast amount of uncharted territory to explore regarding the possible effects of solar eclipses on dairy cows. What we suggest, along with Dr. Overall and many other experts in the field, is to observe, record, and always ensure that our cattle are well cared for during these extraordinary astronomical occurrences.

The Bottom Line

So, it seems that while cows, like all animals, undoubtedly have their internal rhythms that could be slightly disturbed by a sudden solar eclipse, the overall impact of such celestial occurrences appears to be quite minimal. The key takeaway here is that animals are resilient and adaptable creatures. They may experience some initial discomfort or confusion due to the sudden shift from light to darkness, but it’s typically short-lived and not expected to influence long-term behavior or milk production. Now, we can continue to appreciate the mesmerizing beauty of a solar eclipse without undue worry for our bovine friends. Earth’s everyday marvels, including the animals around us, continue to fascinate, ensnaring our curiosity as we delve deeper into understanding the complexities of life under the cosmos. 

April 4-6, 2024–The 2024 National Dairy Challenge Contest and Academy concluded on Saturday, April 6th, 2024. Dairy-focused college students – 212 in total – traveled to Visalia, California, which was the first visit to a western dairy for many students. Over 37 schools attended, allowing students from across US and Canada to visit one of the three hosting dairy farms in California. Dairy Challenge provides a unique opportunity for students to engage in dairy industry management and communication, while networking with other students and exploring industry careers.

“I always encourage students to embrace the opportunities that Dairy Challenge presents. It is more than a competition, it is a community that fosters innovation, leadership, and a shared commitment to excellence in dairy. Dairy Challenge provides a platform for students to apply theoretical knowledge to real-world dairy operations, gaining hands-on experience and networking,” explained Dr. Gail Carpenter, coach of the Iowa State University team and NAIDC Board Member.

The students gathered on Thursday, April 4th to receive data from the farms to evaluate before visiting the farms on Friday, April 5th. Contest students gathered with their teams to review their data, begin collaborating, and prepare for the farm visits. Academy participants from four-year universities or two-year dairy programs were divided into small groups from various schools, and dairy industry volunteers worked as Mentors to coach these Academy participants as they assessed the dairy and developed recommendations.

On the second day, 84 Academy students visited Curtimade Farms accompanied by industry mentors. Students assessed different aspects of each dairy farm including calf care, parlor management, transition pens, and feed management. They also conducted interviews with the producers to gain insights into farm management practices and goals. In the afternoon, students used the data collected during the farm visits and interviews to develop their presentations.

While Academy students were visiting their farm, contest teams from the different schools visited one of two farms, River Ranch Dairy or Flint Dairy. Over 128 students from 32 teams completed on-farm analysis, with just two hours to visit and observe the farm’s operation. After a question-and-answer session with the farm owners and advisors, the student teams developed recommendations for nutrition, reproduction, milking procedures, animal health, cow comfort, and labor and financial management.

This year’s contest included 32 universities, whose four-person teams competed for awards based on the quality of teams’ farm analysis and appropriate solutions. Their farm presentations were evaluated by a panel of five judges, including dairy producers, veterinarians, finance specialists and seasoned agribusiness personnel.

The final day of the contest saw judge panels evaluating each team’s presentations, which highlighted the strengths and areas of improvement for their respective farms. Additionally, students visited the Career and Innovation Fair and attended top-level technology presentations from NAIDC sponsors. These topics were presented by:

• Matt Groen of Cargill – “Dairy Sustainability, a Multi-Faceted Approach”
• Mitch Hockett of ST Genetics – “ Sustainability: Genetics and Technology that Reward Producers and Consumers.”
• Tony Parreira and Zachary Barlow of AgWest Farm Credit – “Sustainability: Planning for Tomorrow”
• Ian Johnson of Select Sires – “Low Carbon Technologies”
• Jarett Zonneveld of Alta Genetics – “Breeding Programs of the Future”
• Frank Mitloehner of UC Davis – “Sustainable Livestock, Sustainable Future”

The event concluded with the presentation of student awards, marking the end of the successful 2024 National Dairy Challenge Contest and Academy. The judges awarded the following teams with the first and second place ranking on each farm among the 32 total teams participating.

The National Dairy Challenge Contest and Academy is the concluding event of the four regional contests sponsored each year by North American Intercollegiate Dairy Challenge® (NAIDC).The national contest and regional events – for about 250 dairy collegiates – are funded through generous support by 130 agribusinesses and dairy producers. Dairy Challenge has helped prepare over 10,000 students for careers as dairy owners or managers, consultants, researchers, veterinarians or other dairy professionals.

About Dairy Challenge

NAIDC is an innovative event for students in dairy programs at North American post-secondary institutions. Its mission is to develop tomorrow’s dairy leaders and enhance the progress of the dairy industry, by providing education, communication and networking among students, dairy producers, agribusiness and university personnel. The 2025 National Dairy Challenge contest will be held in Gainesville, Florida on April 6-8, 2025; details are at www.dairychallenge.org.

As we navigate this new age of infectious diseases and their impact on global industries, it is paramount to examine the trials the US dairy farming sector is facing amidst the latest bird flu outbreak. What are the challenges at hand? What plot twists can we anticipate in this unfolding narrative? The answers, much like the situation itself, are intricate and multifaceted. 

At the core of the conundrum, we have bird flu outbreak and the various restrictions it imposes, such as permits and quarantines. Eventuating from a necessity to stem the spread of the virus, these legislative measures have, however, cast a distinct shadow on the thriving vein of US dairy farming. 

“Farmers, more than ever, need to consider the implications of their activities on the wider environment and community. An outbreak, such as this one with bird flu, is not just a solitary event. It is, indeed, a stark spotlight illuminating the intertwined threads of commerce, health, and environmental integrity.”

The subsequent sections of this article will dissect these aspects meticulously – the situation’s unique predicament, its ramifications, and the critical questions that stem from it – providing insightful analysis and provocations for our collective industry introspection.

Understanding Bird Flu and Its Impact on the Dairy Industry

Given the recent development of the bird flu outbreak, we, at the heart of the dairy industry, face a terrain of unprecedented challenges and complexities. In a shocking turn of events, the bird flu has breached the barrier between avian species and dairy cattle in the United States, marking the first occurrence of such a cross-species shift. But why does this matter, one might ask. Cattle – an integral part of our dairy production – transmitting this highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) threatens both the productivity and the safety of our dairy products. 

As detailed by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS), the first positive test of HPAI was detected in a dairy herd in Idaho. The spread has since extended to six states, with every affected cow possibly tracing back to a single farm. These alarming reports compel us to reassess our understanding of the disease’s spread, suggesting that the virus may not be transmitted directly from cow-to-cow, but instead could be spreading via dairy workers or milking equipment, potentially carried through droplets on clothes, gloves or suction cups used for milking. 

How exactly does this influence our industry operation and output? The gravest consequence is the degradation of product quality and safety. The unfortunate reality is that milk from infected animals must be diverted or even destroyed. Consumers, industry workers, regulators – we are all left grappling with the question, how can we guarantee the safety of our milk during such outbreaks? In response, The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has published a series of questions and answers targeted at these concerns. Their advisories assert that manufacturing or selling raw unpasteurized milk products made from cows exhibiting symptoms of illness or exposed to avian influenza is an unacceptable risk. 

The impact of the bird flu outbreak is not constrained to cows alone. The virus has been detected in goats in Minnesota, reminding us of the potential widespread impact across diverse sectors of the livestock industry. As this crisis unfolds, will we rise to the occasion, challenged to innovate and adapt our practices to this new landscape? In an industry often criticized for its conventional practices, perhaps this situation offers a necessary, albeit distressing, catalyst for meaningful change.

Importance of Immediate Action: Notification and Permits

In dealing with such an unprecedented crisis caused by the bird flu outbreak, it is incumbent upon us as a community of dairy farmers to comprehend the fundamental importance of immediate action, particularly concerning notification and permits. Even as federal agencies collaborate with state and industry partners to manage and diminish the threats posed by cattle illnesses, there is no doubt that the first line of defense is the dairy producers themselves. 

Indeed, the expedient reporting of cattle diseases cannot be overstated in its worth. This vital action enables the faster containment and control of any potential outbreak, and safeguards not only the afflicted farm but neighbouring dairy establishments as well. Simultaneously, ethical considerations necessitate that dairy farmers uphold enhanced biosecurity measures, a testament to our shared responsibility in preventing the further dissemination of these dangerous ailments. 

In this unparalleled scenario, the parameters of our permits are also evolving. One might ask, then, how does this entail a greater commitment? Consider this: permits now require that any milk entering interstate commerce for consumption must first undergo pasteurization. While this might appear laborious, the long-term benefits to the safety and quality of dairy — indeed, our backbone — are undeniable. Texas Agriculture Commissioner Sid Miller’s pledge to exhaust every resource to preserve quality and safety in Texas agriculture reinforces the importance of these developments. 

In truth, the fallout from inaction could be astronomical, with affected milk from diseased animals being diverted or destroyed. As the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the U.S. Department of Agriculture have confirmed, even polar bears and marine animals are suffering the consequences of this outbreak. The Food and Drug Administration’s call to consumers to be aware of the risks associated with raw milk consumption in light of the high pathogenic avian influenza detections should serve as a clarion call to us all. 

In the final analysis, what is demanded of us, dairy farmers and those in the industry, is a tenacity and resilience, a commitment to safeguard our livestock, our consumers, and indeed our livelihoods for generations to come.

First Steps: Reporting a Suspected Bird Flu Outbreak

In the face of the recent bird flu outbreak, communication is critical to curb its spreading. Dairy farmers are being urged to promptly report any illness in their cattle to local authorities. Although the instances of bird flu transmission to humans remain a rarity, the spread of the bird flu to dairy cattle, as confirmed by the USDA, necessitates proactive measures from all industry stakeholders. This is the first time in U.S. history that the dairy cattle are impacted, reaching to six states, according to research. 

The situation raises legitimate concerns, but it’s also important to underline that preliminary testing by the National Veterinary Services Laboratories has found no significant changes in the bird flu virus that could enhance its transmission to humans. Accordingly, the risk posed to the public remains low, but remains a matter requiring situational awareness and timely actions. 

The uncharted spread points to the possible transmission from a single farm source, exacerbating the need for accurate and swift disease reporting. This is a reminder of the interconnectedness of our industry – how a single event can ripple across the country, affecting numerous farms and threatening the very backbone of our dairy production. So, what should be the first steps when a suspected bird flu outbreak occurs on a farm? 

To prevent further spread via potential vectors such as milking equipment or the personnel involved in milking, it’s imperative that the affected dairy farmers report the situation promptly. This should involve immediate collaboration with specialized veterinarians and the local agricultural department. Closely adhering to enhanced biosecurity measures is also essential to prevent the spread of the virus to other cattle in the vicinity. 

Such efforts underscored by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) are currently mobilizing resources following the detection of the highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) within a dairy herd in Idaho, along with presumptive positive results in New Mexico, Michigan, and Texas. 

Could these emerging challeges lead us to re-evaluate our existing practices and policies? More importantly, could it push the industry towards implementing innovative solutions to tackle future threats? These are the questions that demand a collective industry-wide response, and the responsibility must not fall upon the shoulders of individual dairy farmers alone. After all, our collective success hinges on our willingness to face these challenges head-on and work together to ensure the health and sustainability of the U.S. dairy industry.

Quarantine Protocols: What Dairy Farmers Need to Know

With the recent detection of the highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) in a dairy herd in Idaho, the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS), farmers broadly distributed across the U.S. dairy landscape are compelled to re-evaluate their response plans for infectious diseases. But what are the key elements that dairy farmers should know and implement in the face of a looming bird flu outbreak?

The heart of the response resides in stringent quarantine protocols. Practicing robust enhanced biosecurity measures is not just good practice— it is crucial in curtailing the spread of the virus. Farmers are urged to work closely with veterinarians and report cattle illnesses promptly, thereby enabling effective monitoring and timely response to potential HPAI threats.

Maintaining the integrity of the milk supply is a paramount concern for dairy farm operators. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) encourages consultation with state regulatory officials and vets for direction on thwarting HPAI transmission in raw milk. Furthermore, the FDA advises against manufacturing or selling raw unpasteurized milk products made with milk from cows showing signs of illness or exposed to avian influenza. So why is this important?

Let us pause to consider the health risks intertwined with using raw milk from infected cows. Despite the deceptive veil of normalcy that cows infected with HPAI may display — indeed, they may show no overt signs of illness — the risk of contamination remains potent. This means that dairy producers are required to send only milk from healthy animals into processing for human consumption, for the safety and health of the greater populace.

Moreover, the FDA strongly encourages the pasteurization of milk from symptomatic cows before feeding it to calves or other animals, in order to curb the propagation of the virus within the herd itself. Walking down this path is not only prudent, it could potentially deflect a significant blow to a dairy operation and the larger dairy sector.

So, to our dairy farmer colleagues we pose the question: how robust are your current quarantine protocols really? Is it not time to step up and reassess these plans in the shadow of the Bird Flu outbreak? Let’s confront the task head-on and work towards a common goal of abundant, safe and disease-free dairy production.

Beyond Quarantine: Managing Dairy Operations Amid the Bird Flu Outbreak

The outbreak of the bird flu in dairy cattle in the United States, a first, signifies a new challenge for dairy farmers already reeling from several predicaments within the industry. It requires stringent measures not only to contain the spread of this highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) but also to manage day-to-day operations amid these unprecedented circumstances. In six states, the USDA has confirmed the spread of the virus to cattle, possibly tracing back to one farm. Could this suggest a more widespread problem that we are yet to fully ascertain? 

Arguably, the greatest challenge lies in breaking the cycle of disease transmission. Preliminary investigations point to milking equipment and individuals involved in milking as potential conduits for virus spread. Such revelation demands reevaluation of existing biosecurity measures. They call for strengthened sanitization protocols, particularly focusing on the cleaning and disinfecting of equipment and ensuring increased personal hygiene of the dairy workforce. 

Meanwhile, the role of the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) cannot be stressed enough. Its rapid response in confirming the detection of HPAI in a dairy herd in Idaho, demonstrated vigilance. Yet, further support, in terms of resources and guidance, for affected farmers is paramount. Can the industry and government agencies together, establish a mechanism facilitating this necessary rapport? 

Another critical consideration for dairy farmers is the impact on product manufacturing and sales. With the FDA advising against making or selling raw unpasteurized milk products from cows showing illness symptoms or exposed to avian influenza, disruptions to the supply chain are imminent. To mitigate these effects, the FDA proposes consultations with state regulatory officials and veterinarians. But can such consultations provide the necessary guidance to prevent HPAI transmission in raw milk? Most importantly, how will these regulations affect the precarious balance of supply and demand within the distressed dairy industry? 

Reporting cattle illnesses in a timely manner is also essential. In these testing times, early detection and quick action can potentially prevent an outbreak from snowballing into an epidemic. Producers need to enhance their biosecurity measures to mitigate the challenge posed by HPAI. But is the industry prepared for quick and efficient reporting? What are the barriers that farmers face and how can we strive towards removing them? 

These issues underscore the mounting complexity of managing dairy operations amid the bird flu outbreak. In the face of this new adversity, critical dialogue, innovative thinking, and ethical considerations must underpin the industry’s response. For it is not just about surviving this outbreak, but also using this experience to better prepare for future challenges. We, as a community, ought to rise to this challenge. 

The Bottom Line

In conclusion, the alarm bells sounded by the bird flu outbreak present a complex challenge for the US dairy farming industry. Though various administrative bodies including the American Veterinary Medical Association, U.S. Department of Agriculture, and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, affirm a minimal risk to human consumers, producers are urged to act diligently. Quick reporting and enhanced biosecurity measures are paramount. It is, therefore, intrinsic to understand that while the bird flu outbreak prompts a procedural shakeup – permitting changes, quarantine protocol implementation, and operational management – the potential for significantly disrupting the milk supply or prices seems limited at this juncture. We must remember that we are not passive observers to this situation, the actions we take now will shape the trajectory of the dairy industry’s future. Amplified cooperation and attention can ensure the maintenance of both the industry’s performance and the safety of the public – a balance we should strive for.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has issued a health alert network advisory (HAN) in response to the H5N1 bird flu outbreak in at least 16 dairy herds in six states across the country. The advisory recommends that healthcare providers should consider whether a patient has a relevant exposure history, such as someone who works with dairy cows or lives with someone who works with dairy cows. The illness should be considered for mild, medium, and severe symptoms, from conjunctivitis to fever, shortness of breath, or pneumonia and/or organ failure.

Any patient suspected of having H5N1 flu should be isolated and cared for by medical professionals wearing protective equipment. Suspected cases should be started on the flu drug oseltamivir (Tamiflu) even before test results confirming the infection have come back. The CDC said that no additional cases of human infection with HPAI A(H5N1) virus associated with the current infections in dairy cattle and birds in the United States, and no human-to-human transmission of HPAI A(H5N1) virus have been identified.

In cows, the illness has been mild to date, with infected animals showing a decline in milk production and decreased feed consumption. Dairy operations have been instructed to destroy milk from infected animals, as milk from infected animals has been found to contain H5N1 viruses. Pasteurization would destroy the viruses even if contaminated milk were to make its way into the human food chain. Consumption of raw milk or raw milk cheese from infected cows could pose a health risk and should be avoided.

Infected cows have been reported from Texas, Kansas, New Mexico, Idaho, Michigan, and Ohio. It is unclear if the virus is transmitting from cow-to-cow through the respiratory route, or if some aspect of dairy operations is fueling the spread of the virus. The CDC’s advisory stated that analyses of viruses taken from the infected person, cows, and wild birds and poultry showed only small genetic changes.

Exploring the challenging landscape of congenital diseases invariably leads us to remarkable stories of courage and resilience. One such narrative is the story of Brooks Markus, marking an intense battle with Congenital Central Hypoventilation Syndrome (CCHS), a rare and severe genetic disorder characterized by the failure of automatic control of breathing. His inspirational battle not only illuminates the struggles faced by those with CCHS but also shines a light on an innovative cause known as ‘Calves for a Cause’— an understated initiative championing the needs of individuals like Brooks. 

“CCHS, characterized by a ‘silent’ yet relentless struggle, demands a newfound respect, evoking our common responsibility as society and industry to effect change. When will we genuinely prioritize genetic research and innovative therapies? The fight, embodied by individuals like young Brooks Markus, is happening every day.”

Born on October 28, 2019 into this challenging world with CCHS was Brooks Markus. Brooks is 1 of approximately 1,500 people globally who grapple with this formidable disorder. This distressing affliction perturbs the brain’s aptitude to smoothly handle autonomic functions, such as the essential task of breathing, and can even intrude upon other vital processes, such as sleeping. Markus’s journey has been one marked by challenges and triumphs. Yet, amidst the uncertainties, Brooks and his family have found great support from the church and dairy communities.

From a clinical standpoint, Congenital Central Hypoventilation Syndrome, or ‘Ondine’s Curse’, is a complex disease. Its sufferers, like Brooks, are unable to perceive and respond to decreased levels of oxygen or increased levels of carbon dioxide, particularly during sleep. This can lead to severe health implications including heart failure, lung damage, and neurological effects.

Brooks spent his first 120 days of life at the Children’s Hospital’s Neonatal Intensive Care Unit and Pediatric Critical Care Unit. Brooks Father Darryl Markus acknowledges it was a “blessing in disguise” that his family had just recently relocated to the Ingersoll region, where they can get to the hospital more quickly than where they previously resided. Markus grew up on the well-known Markvale Holsteins farm and acquired quota and a farm in the Belleville region before venturing out on his own. If the family had remained in that region, they would have had to drive several hours to the children’s hospital in Ottawa.

Darryl and wife Sarah have five additional children, all boys, and have never shared anything about their family on social media. But when news spread about Brooks in the hours after his birth, “we probably had almost 40 messages in the first two days asking how he was doing.” So they started posting on social media to keep their friends and family informed, many of whom worked in the dairy sector. Darryl tells how a snowball effect resulted in the inaugural Calves for a Cause sale, and now in its fourth year.

“The sole purpose of the sale is to give back to the London Children’s Hospital,” explains Darryl Markus, Brooks’ father and sale creator. “It’s our way of thanking you for the wonderful care Brooks gets there, as well as supporting other families who need care there. For us, the London Children’s Hospital is a second home; the incredible health care experts there treat Brooks and our family like family, and we hope that sale proceeds may assist every family experience the same love and care Brooks has.”

Calves for a Cause is a consignment sale, and dairy breeders can choose to provide either 100 per cent of the proceeds or a portion of the proceeds to the Foundation.  All commissions earned are also donated to the Foundation. ‘Calves for a Cause’ has already made significant strides towards shedding light on and supporting children’s healthcare in the London region With an impressive tally of over $170,000 contributed thus far.  The first Calves for a Cause was held virtually in 2021, followed by another virtual edition in 2022 as well as  in-person consignment viewing was held. Last year it was held in conjunction with the Canadian Dairy Xpo in Stratford.   

Now in its fourth year, the ‘Calves for a Cause’ initiative was held again as part of Canadian Dairy Xpo in the Cow Coliseum on April 3rd, featuring 40+ head of dairy calves from multiple breeds and then was followed by an embryo and semen auction ending on the 4th.

This year’s sale was extra special as Brooks, the driving motivation behind this great sale was able to take charge and lead some of the consignments himself on this special occasion. 

Darryl Markus comments “We often get ask, why? Why we’re so passionate about Calves For A Cause. Of course, Brooks is a major part of our why but, it’s way deeper than that now. Yes our why has come from a life of tears, anxiety and pain I wouldn’t wish on my worst enemy but, there’s also the countless children and parents we’ve met along our journey. It’s the children we see heading into the oncology unit, it’s the little premie baby going by us in the halls with the transport team on its way to the incredible NICU staff. It’s the children who have been involved in a car accident and need the amazing PCCU staff just to keep them breathing. If you’ve walked through a Children’s hospital, you know exactly what we’re talking about, the experience is life-changing! Our why is making sure we can do our part to make the best of terrible situations for families like ours just trying to figure out what the next 15 minutes looks like much less the next day!”

“The support from the ag industry and our church community has be incredible,” Darryl remarked. “We’ve learned that you can’t take anything for granted and every day that Brooks is here is a gift.” Comments Brooks’ father Darryl Markus. “As a family, we’d like to say a huge thank everyone involved with the live part of the sale, consignors, buyers and the entire staff, we truly couldn’t do it without all of you!! Putting an event on like this is a lot of work but immensely gratifying when you see the excitement it brings people!”

Discover why butter is the healthier choice over margarine. Uncover the truth about their nutritional values and how it impacts your health.

For decades now, the great butter versus margarine debate has left many consumers scratching their heads in the grocery aisle. In the past, butter was put in a corner because of concerns about its saturated fat content, but the tides are turning. Butter is making a comeback as a wholesome, natural fat teeming with potential health benefits. On the other hand, margarine – previously touted as the healthier swap – has landed in the epicenter of numerous controversies due to its synthetic composition and concerning past ties with trans fats. But, fear not, as we aim to bring clarity to this conundrum. In this article, we will systematically unravel the truths and myths surrounding these two popular spreads, and show you why, in the balancing act of health and taste, butter comfortably triumphs over margarine.

Grasping the Basics 

Let’s start with understanding what these two contenders actually are! 

What is Butter? 

If we trace back to its origins, butter is essentially a dairy product, which comes to life after cream undergoes a process known as churning. This method separates the butterfat from the buttermilk, yielding what we know today as butter. Over centuries, it has held a dominant position in cooking and baking, chiefly attributed to its rich flavor and impressive versatility. 

Key Characteristics:

• Ingredients: Predominantly cream or milk, and salt is added in those varieties which are salted.
• Nutrient Composition per Tablespoon:
  • Calories: 102
  • Total Fat: 12g
  • Saturated Fat: 7g
  • Cholesterol: 31mg
  • Vitamins: A, D, E, and K

What is Margarine? 

Fast forward to the 19th century, margarine emerged as a more economic alternative to butter. Its foundation lies in vegetable oils, commonly soybean, palm, or canola oil, and it’s given a hint of water, emulsifiers, preservatives, and flavorings designed to replicate the taste and texture of butter. Some varieties also contain dairy solids. 

Key Characteristics:

• Ingredients: Vegetable oils, water, emulsifiers, preservatives, flavorings and occasionally dairy solids.
• Nutrient Composition per Tablespoon:
  • Calories: 80
  • Total Fat: 9g
  • Saturated Fat: 2g
  • Cholesterol: 0mg
  • Vitamins: Mainly A and D (fortified)

Health Implications: Butter vs. Margarine 

Let’s delve deeper into the health impacts. Starting with saturated fats and cholesterol content, these are key factors when weighing butter against margarine. 

Saturated Fats 

Traditionally, the high saturated fat content in butter has been linked to an increased risk of heart disease. But recent studies are challenging this belief, suggesting that moderate consumption of saturated fats may not directly contribute to heart disease. On the other hand, newer margarine options have lower saturated fat content, positioning them as seemingly healthier options. 

Cholesterol 

Butter contains cholesterol, which may influence blood cholesterol levels in some people. Conversely, margarine, made from plant-based oils, is cholesterol-free, giving it a leg up for those with specific cardiac dietary restrictions. 

Trans Fats 

Butter naturally contains trace amounts of trans fats, but these are not considered harmful in moderate quantities. In contrast, older margarines contained partially hydrogenated oils, a significant source of harmful artificial trans fats. Thankfully, modern margarines are formulated with little to no trans fats. Nevertheless, it’s pertinent to check the label for “partially hydrogenated oils.” 

Nutrient Density 

Nutrient density is another important aspect of this comparison. Butter is rich in several beneficial nutrients: 

• Vitamin A: A crucial nutrient for vision, immune function, and reproduction.
• Vitamin D: Supports bone health and immune function.
• Vitamin K2: Essential for bone and cardiovascular health.
• Butyrate: A fatty acid with anti-inflammatory properties.
• Conjugated Linoleic Acid (CLA): This may have potential cancer-fighting properties.

On the flip side, while margarine is often fortified with Vitamins A and D, it generally lacks the other beneficial nutrients found abundantly in butter. This deficiency in nutrient richness also tips the scale in favor of butter.

Why Butter Triumphs Over Margarine 

You might be wondering why butter could possibly have an edge over margarine. Well, beyond the reasons already stated, here are five more compelling reasons that could tip the scale for you: 

1. Natural Ingredient Profile 

Butter, in its simplicity, is primarily cream and salt. The beauty of it lies in the fact that it undergoes minimal processing. On the other hand, margarine is often laden with artificial ingredients such as emulsifiers and preservatives, which can have questionable impacts on your health. 

2. Nutrient Density 

Butter packs a nutritional punch in a way that margarine does not. It’s naturally full of vital vitamins and beneficial fatty acids. These precious nutrients are typically missing in margarine unless it’s fortified — which is essentially just adding them back in artificially. 

3. Minimal Processing 

The creation of butter is quite simple: it comes down to some good old fashioned churning. Margarine, however, involves a complex chemical process to transform vegetable oils into a butter-like product. It’s often bleached and deodorized, which may not be the image of healthful eating you had in mind. 

4. Flavor and Culinary Versatility 

Butter doesn’t just win in the health department; it’s also a champion in the kitchen. With its unparalleled rich flavor and texture, it significantly enhances your cooking and baking experiences. Margarine can try to mimic butter’s fabulous flavor, but it often falls short with an artificial aftertaste and a texture that doesn’t perform as well. 

5. Health Benefits of Grass-Fed Butter 

When it comes to butter, not all are created equal. Grass-fed butter bears extraordinary richness in Conjugated Linoleic Acid (CLA), Vitamin K2, and Omega-3 fatty acids. These nutrients offer additional health benefits over conventional butter, making grass-fed butter an even more potent health champion.

Practical Tips for Choosing and Using Butter 

When navigating through the creamy world of butter, discernment in your choices carries great significance. What kind and what quality of butter you opt for will determine the nutritional benefits you can reap. 

Choose Quality: 

Selecting high-quality butter can amplify its inherent health advantages. Going for grass-fed butter not only lets you enjoy a rich and vibrant flavor but also results in maximized nutrient benefits. It contains higher levels of essential fatty acids and vitamins. To ensure you’re not ingesting unnecessary additives, considering organic butter can be wise. Such butter keeps you clear of antibiotics and hormones, maintaining purity in the nutrients you consume. 

Moderate Consumption: 

Butter is a dense source of calories; therefore, moderating your intake is crucial. Butter brings along numerous nutrients, but enjoying it within the limits of a balanced diet is key to harvesting these benefits without excess caloric baggage. 

Storage: 

Proper storage of butter helps maintain its freshness and quality. Refrigeration is the best way to keep your butter lasting longer. However, if you require softened butter, say for spreading on your morning toast, keeping a small quantity at room temperature wouldn’t harm. 

Cooking and Baking: 

Butter’s high smoke point makes it a versatile ingredient in your kitchen. It stands up well to frying and sautéing, imparting a decadent and full-bodied flavor. Furthermore, butter breathes life into baked goods and enriches sauces, heightening their culinary appeal. Each dollop of butter can add a touch of luxury to your meals. 

The Bottom Line

In wrapping up, we have to acknowledge that despite margarine’s initial claim to fame, the tides have shifted significantly in favor of butter. The all-natural composition, laden with a wealth of nutrients, and the distinguishable luscious taste that butter brings to the palate have indeed aided in reestablishing its standing as a wholesome dietary fat. A myriad of modern studies solidify this understanding, highlighting that incorporating moderate amounts of premium butter into your everyday meals can indeed sustain a well-rounded diet. The comparison ends on a promising note for butter, as it outmaneuvers margarine with its authentic, nutrient-dense structure and an unparalleled flavor experience.

Summary: The butter versus margarine debate has been ongoing for decades, with butter emerging as a healthier alternative due to its rich flavor and versatility. Butter is a dairy product that comes to life after cream is churned, separating the butterfat from the buttermilk. It has a nutrient composition of 102 calories, 12g total fat, 7g saturated fat, 31mg cholesterol, and 32mg vitamins A, D, E, and K. Margarine, a more economical alternative, emerged in the 19th century and is based on vegetable oils, often soybean, palm, or canola oil. Health implications of butter include saturated fats and cholesterol content. High saturated fat content in butter has traditionally been linked to an increased risk of heart disease, but recent studies suggest that moderate consumption of saturated fats may not directly contribute to heart disease. Modern margarines are cholesterol-free, making them suitable for those with specific cardiac dietary restrictions. Grass-fed butter offers additional health benefits due to its natural ingredient profile, nutrient density, minimal processing, flavor, and culinary versatility. Moderate consumption of butter is crucial, but enjoying it within a balanced diet is key to obtaining these benefits without excess caloric baggage. Proper storage, such as refrigeration, is essential for maintaining butter’s freshness and quality.

In a shocking development that begs the question of our assumed immunity and preparedness against such occurrences, a rare human case of bird flu has been officially confirmed. Stemming from what is currently considered an unlikely source, the epicenter of this sudden outbreak is purported to be a dairy farm in Texas. Spare a thought for the millions of Americans now thrown into the throes of panic and confusion, with an unnerving uncertainty looms in the air. Is this another pandemic waiting to happen? Despite this prevailing dread, we are left pondering; how did this come to pass? 

“The human case of a bird flu represents not only a rare health event but a stark reminder for us to challenge our notions of safety and readiness in an ever-evolving medical landscape,”

Our subsequent sections will solemnly dissect the emergence of this public health concern, demystifying the potential pathways leading to this unusual transmission from birds to humans, tracing its origins to a dairy farm, of all places. In a sobering retrospective, we shall revisit the impact such unprecedented cases could have on our public health system, while evaluating the ramifications for the industry at large. Will this incident serve as a catalytic moment for an industry-wide reevaluation and renewal? Or will it be yet another footnote in the tragic saga of transmissible diseases? Only time will tell.

Unraveling the Mystery: How Bird Flu Crossed Species in Texas Dairy

The incident in question points towards a mysterious leap the highly pathogenic avian influenza A(H5N1) virus has taken from the avian species to humans. This virus, historically, has been contained within fowl populations, leading to significant mortality rates amongst them. However, the transmission of the virus to a human in a Texas Dairy indicates a worrisome evolutionary step. 

How, then, has this virus, which Savunzzi and Centanni identified was caused by a filterable agent back in 1901, adapted to infect a new host species? We could argue it’s an inevitable outcome of viral mutation, but would such an assertion prematurely overlook potential human complacency? 

In discussing this incident, the hive of activity around clinical and field research into bird flu vaccines deserves our attention. After all, isn’t it an arena where failures can cost lives, and successes can save entire species? We must remember that the objective is not just about producing efficient poultry vaccines. It is also about identifying and culling afflicted poultry, developing reliable tests, as well as executing appropriate quarantine practices. 

The patient had close contact with birds in a dairy farm.

Certainly, one cannot ignore the grave implications of such cross-species transmission. Past infections with bird flu in humans showcase a range of manifestations – from asymptomatic or mild illness to severe disease resulting in death. We can’t help but reflect, isn’t it another Pandora’s box already open? 

A disturbing detail in this context is the mode of virus transmission. When you consider that shedding of the virus from birds occurs through their saliva, mucous, and feces, direct and indirect human contact with these substances, especially on a dairy farm, raises prominent risks. 

The patient is in stable condition and is responding to treatment.

Undoubtedly, the recent event enlightens us on the need for better public health intervention strategies and programs. As we ponder upon this, let us bear in mind: Are we as a society prepared for such a biological curveball? Could a stronger, cooperative international focus on comprehensive avian influenza research and the swift application of its implications be the game-changer we desperately need?

Understanding H5N1: The Strain Behind the Texas Dairy Bird Flu Case

When we speak of the H5N1 strain, it behooves us to remember that its origins are far from recent. Indeed, we trace its beginning to 1981, when it was officially termed HPAI (Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza). Fifteen years later, in the year 1996, this strain made its first appearance in a poultry farm in China. Over the years, multiple episodes of reassortment altered the genetic makeup of the virus, crescendoing into a devastating outbreak in Hong Kong where it crossed the species barrier to cause infections, and tragically, death in humans. 

Therefore, it is not wholly surprising that a variant of this very strain has been implicated in the rare human infection in a Texan dairy farm. Yet shouldn’t we question the sequence of events that led us to this predicament? Why, despite existing knowledge and preventive measures, did this transference occur? Was it simply an unfortunate byproduct of cohabitation of species or a stark indication of a larger, more insidious problem? 

The H5N1 strain of the virus, like all influenza viruses, is infamous for its consistent evolution. Thus raises one critical question: could the evolution of this highly pathogenic avian influenza virus, perhaps, precipitate the leap from birds to human? Based on available data, infection pathways can range from asymptomatic or mild illness all the way to severe disease resulting in mortality. This means the severity of the human response is equally as unpredictable as its transmission route, adding further complexity to this issue. 

We, as an industry and a collective, must examine such outbreaks critically, analyzing the circumstances holistically rather than in isolation. Only then can we hope to understand, anticipate, and efficiently prevent such unforeseen spillovers, protecting not just our livestock but also human lives.

Decoding the Infection Route: How Did a Texas Dairy Become Ground Zero?

Any substantial probe into this biosecurity incident must necessarily include reflections on the historical patterns of Avian Influenza Virus (AIV) transmission. The journey of AIV from poultry to humans primarily happens through direct contact with infected poultry or surfaces polluted by the birds. One pertinent question worth contemplating is this: could this be the principal route of infection in the Texas Dairy case? 

Taking a leaf out of history, we see an interesting pattern. Swine Influenza A Virus was first isolated from pigs in 1930 by Shope and Lewis. Could swine serve as a potential intermediary host this time around? Given that AIV can infect pigs before spreading to humans through contact with infected pigs’ secretions, blood, skin, or fur, it stands to reason that this plausible scenario deserves an in-depth investigation. Could this, indeed, be the missing piece that unlocks this transmission puzzle? 

Out of the total 1,116 flocks that tested positive for the virus, a significant percentage were commercial flocks, accounting for 473 cases while 643 came from backyard flocks. It’s crucial to consider this disparity – could it be indicative of the underlying biosecurity measures, or is it a factor of reporting bias? As we critically reflect on these data points, we must simultaneously also diligently consider other transmission potentialities. 

One of the potential means of transmission by AIV is likely caused by accidental inoculation of the virus into eyes, nose, or mouth, radiating through respiratory routes. Alternatively, it could be through inhalation of the virus present in the air. These routes, while less likely in a controlling environment, can’t be ruled out when we get into the broad open spaces of dairy farms. It brings forth the question, could we, in the industry, be doing more to prevent such occurrences? 

Significantly, efficient human-to-human transmission of AIV is plausible. This prompts us to reflect on the need for heightened biopreparedness, not just within poultry farms, but also in public health systems. Are we collectively prepared to manage and ward off human influenza pandemics? What measures are being taken by the global community to prevent the recurrence of such viral spillovers? These are questions we must embrace, consider, and confront responsibly. 

The Texas Dairy case, therefore, could potentially represent more consequential underpinnings than a singular, isolated event. We must address the situation not only in the immediate term but also lend our focus towards drawing upon this incident as a learning opportunity for the wider industry. In seeking to answer the question of how this farm became the ground zero, it behooves us to delve deeper into the complex dynamics of AIV cross-species transmission and the role our practices play therein.

Could Your Glass of Milk Be a Carrier? Bird Flu in the Dairy Supply Chain

It would not be unjust to feel a quiver of apprehension as you stare at your morning glass of milk. But is such panic deserved? Quite frankly, is your milk a plausible vehicle for the distribution of bird flu, particularly in light of the recent bird flu case at a Texas dairy? Let’s unpack this unnerving possibility and investigate dairy’s potential role in the transmission chain. 

To gain a thorough understanding of the scenario, we need to scrutinize the evidence linking milk to virus transmission. The key lies in understanding the intricacies of the bird flu virus, primarily how it is shed and spread. The Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza A(H5N1) Virus – the strain involved in the Texas case – is shed through the saliva, mucous, and feces of infected birds, thus potentially tainting water and feed supplies of dairies. 

Now, can this virus enter your milk? Current research strongly negates this probability. It is essential to appreciate that while the A(H5N1) virus is skilled at infiltrating avian species, crossing over to bovines and subsequently penetrating the milk supply chain presents an immense biological hurdle. Unlike avian species, cattle are not designed to be conducive hosts for the bird flu virus. 

Yet, it’s crucial to stay vigilant. The constant mutation of viruses challenges our understanding and demands adaptable, resilient infrastructures. So what can we, as an industry, do to prevent such a pandemic potential from snowballing into an unfortunate reality? We must continually refine our aide measures to prevent such cross-species migration. 

Key measures include separating wild and domesticated birds, providing safe, uncontaminated drinking water, identifying and culling affected poultry swiftly, and reinforcing research into vigilant testing and clinic-ready vaccines. Strict quarantine practices are also essential for curbing the spread of this highly pathogenic virus. If these industry norms are upheld diligently, the chances of you staring at your glass of milk with dread can be minimized substantially. 

And so the dairy industry, aligned with the health sector, must spearhead an adaptable and uncompromising strategy to curb the potential, unnerving hazard of a disease-stricken dairy supply chain. Certainly, this is a goal worth pursuing, is it not?

The Bottom Line

In a nutshell, this Texas dairy bird flu case serves as a stark reminder of the vulnerabilities inherent in our current food systems. It demands drastic and immediate action, yes, but perhaps it also serves as a catalyst for a paradigm shift in how we view and manage zoonotic diseases. Now the critical question that remains: Are we, as an industry and society, ready to accept this challenge and pave the way towards a more secure, health-conscious future?

The highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) virus infecting US dairy cattle is remarkably unremarkable and there is no evidence that it has mutated. Last month, the USDA confirmed that a strain of HPAI was detected in dairy cows in Texas and Kansas, causing them to suddenly dry off or produce thick, colostrum-like milk. The condition isn’t associated with deaths as cows mostly recover with supportive measures in around 12 days.

Since the first detections in March, further cases have emerged in the past week, including additional cases in Texas and New Mexico, Michigan, Idaho, and Ohio. Cows were initially considered ‘dead-end hosts’, but detections on a Michigan farm that had taken in cattle from Texas suggested cow-to-cow transmission could not be ruled out. A dairy worker believed to have been in close contact with a sick cow tested positive for the virus, and the person had eye redness as the only symptoms and is isolating while recovering.

Hamberg suggested that these recent detections among cows and the rare case in a human were possible scenarios. He explained that this is still being considered a spillover event, and there is no specific mutation that can point to and say the virus is now mammalian-adapted. Pasteurization inactivates the virus, making commercial milk supplies safe for consumption. There are no fears of milk shortage, with just several herds across all of the US affected by the virus so far.

Dairy brands could benefit from reassuring their consumers about the spread of the virus and the potential impact on the safety of meat and dairy products they consume. Brands can build trust with consumers through clear labeling, certifications, seals, traceability, and supply chain information.

The Collegiate Dairy Products Evaluation Contest board of directors are proud to announce its momentous milestone as it commemorates a 100 years of fostering excellence in the dairy industry. Established in 1916, this esteemed competition has been a cornerstone of dairy products training, education, and sensory evaluation for over 100 years.

Contest History:

Since its humble beginnings in 1916, the Collegiate Dairy Products Evaluation Contest has played a pivotal role in shaping the future of the dairy industry. For a century, the contest has provided a platform for students and professionals to showcase their expertise in the evaluation and analysis of dairy products .

“Students from nine agriculture colleges competed in the first butter judging contest held at the Nationals.The Massachusetts Society for the Promotion of Agriculture gave very liberal prizes for winning teams and individuals, and it was largely instrumental in making the contest possible.” – Hoards Dairyman, November 10, 1916, p. SS4.

This is a summary of the first Collegiate Dairy Products Evaluation Contest held in connection with the National Dairy Show sponsored by the National Dairy Association. Butter was the only product judged because of its commercial importance at that time. From this modest beginning in 1916, the Student’s Butter Judging Contest has grown to an internationally recognized competition with university teams from the United states and several international teams with over 100 dairy industry company participants and sponsors. While it started with butter in 1916; cheddar cheese and milk were added in 1917, in 1926 ice cream, in 1962 cottage cheese, and in 1977 yogurt was added.

The Contest has been sponsored by several organizations over the years. The first butter judging contest was sponsored by the National Dairy Association later followed by the American Dairy Science Association (ADSA), International Association of Food Industry Suppliers (IAFIS) and the American Dairy Association and International Dairy Foods Association. Today, the three primary sponsoring organizations are Wisconsin Cheesemakers Association, the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), and the Dairy Recognition and Education Foundation (DREF). Companies throughout the dairy industry also support the contest in many ways through hosting contest space, donations to the contest, product samples to judge, as well as time by industry leaders, to judge, officiate and organize the event.

Over a century later, 5 generations of college students have been trained in sensory methods of evaluating the quality of six dairy products – butter, cheddar cheese, cottage cheese, yogurt and vanilla ice cream. The number of college teams rose from nine to a maximum of 33 in 1956. The Contest represents the culmination of an intense training of students by college professors who are experts in dairy product evaluation. Over the years, more than 4000 students have participated.

While training is at the heart of the mission of CDPEC, winning comes with dedication, talent, and time. The most team wins have been from South Dakota State University, The Ohio State University, Mississippi State, and Iowa State University. Below is a table of participating universities through the years:

*No contests were held in 1918 (WWI), from 1942 to 1946 (WWII), and 2020 to 2021.

Educational Impact:

The contest is not only about wins and competition, it has served as a crucial educational tool . It has allowed undergraduate teams of participants as well as graduate students to hone their skills, gain practical experience, and develop a profound understanding of dairy products’ quality and characteristics. The impact of this educational initiative is reflected in the countless successful careers it has nurtured.

With upwards of 20 schools participating yearly, it’s incredible to think of the thousands of participants over the years.

Celebrating Achievements:

As we mark this significant milestone, we reflect on the numerous achievements and advancements that have emerged from the Collegiate Dairy Products Evaluation Contest. The dedication of participants, the support of industry partners, and the commitment of organizers have collectively contributed to the contest’s enduring success. Many companies and individuals have been pivotal in continued success, with several stepping up to form a board of directors in 2008. In 2018, the board said goodbye to out-dated scantron sheets and upgraded to a new, flexible scoring system that can be updated in real time to adjust scoring attributes much more rapidly as dairy products evolve and tabulate scores in no time.

Students have received countless awards, scholarships, and memorable experiences through travel stipends. Several trips are sponsored for winners and their coaches including judging side by side with pros at the U.S. and World Cheese Competitions, judging at the American Cheese Society Contest, and a trip to the QCS Annual Conference.

As we celebrate the past, we also look forward to the future. The Collegiate Dairy Products Evaluation Contest remains committed to fostering training, excellence, and collaboration within the dairy industry. CDPEC has kick-started many careers with the support of dedicated coaches at over 60 universities from across the globe. With the continued support by generous sponsors, dedication of coaches and students, and support of industry leaders, we are confident that the next century will train and serve more students than the last.

Centennial Celebration Event:

To mark the 100th anniversary, the Collegiate Dairy Products Evaluation Contest will be hosting a special centennial celebration event on April 17, 2024. Please join us at CheeseExpo to celebrate during the awards ceremony right before the WCMA cheese auction. We would love to recognize and connect with past participants, judges, industry leaders, and supporters to commemorate the contest’s rich history.

The Nebraska Department of Agriculture (NDA) has imposed a restriction on the importation of dairy cattle due to the recent outbreak of Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza (HPAI), also known as bird flu. The order requires all breeding female dairy cattle entering the state to have a permit issued by the NDA first. To obtain a permit, dairy producers must contact the NDA and consult with their local veterinarian. The new importation order will be in place for 30 days until April 30, 2024, and will be re-evaluated at that time. HPAI has been detected in lactating dairy cattle in states like Texas, New Mexico, Michigan, Idaho, and Nebraska’s bordering state, Kansas. The NDA is closely monitoring the HPAI illness and is advocating for Nebraska producers to protect the health of Nebraska livestock and minimize its impact on the state. The NDA recommends strict biosecurity practices and quarantining new animals into herds for 30 days. State Veterinarian Roger Dudley emphasizes the importance of enhancing biosecurity measures on farms and ranches to protect livestock from illness.

A person working on a dairy farm in Texas tested positive for avian flu, confirmed by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The person, who has the H5N1 virus, is recovering and is being treated with oseltamivir, the generic version of Tamiflu. The risk for the general public remains low, and this is the first case of H5N1 flu in a person linked to dairy cattle and the second in a person in the US. A Colorado man who had direct exposure to poultry and bird culling had bird flu in 2022.

There is no risk to the commercial milk supply, as dairy companies are required to destroy or divert milk from sick cows and pasteurization kills avian flu viruses. Avian flu, a type A influenza virus, originated in birds and has been detected in over a hundred species in the US since 2022. The virus can spread through feces, saliva, and contact with contaminated surfaces. Human-to-human transmission of avian flu through close contact is “very rare.” Symptoms can range from no symptoms at all to mild, with flu-like illness or eye redness, to severe, with cases of pneumonia requiring hospitalization.

The Idaho State Department of Agriculture (ISDA) has confirmed the presence of highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI), or bird flu, in dairy cattle in the state. This brings the number of affected states to four, indicating the virus may be spreading from cow to cow. The cows were brought into the Cassia County dairy from another state that had found HPAI in dairy cattle. The USDA Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) has also confirmed that an investigation into mysterious illnesses in dairy cows in three states was due to HPAI, with wild birds being the source. Symptoms of HPAI include a drop in milk production, loss of appetite, changes in manure consistency, thickened or colostrum-like milk, and low-grade fever. The ISDA encourages dairy producers to closely monitor their herd and contact their local veterinarian if cattle show symptoms.

Discover how USDA farm loans can fuel your sustainable farming practices. Learn about precision agriculture, cover crops, and more. Ready to go green?

The Farm Service Agency (FSA) has curated a suite of farm loan programs aimed at helping farmers and ranchers initiate, broaden, or sustain their family agricultural ventures. Serving as economic stalwarts, these loans can fuel investments towards environmentally conscious, or ‘climate-smart’, practices and equipment. This encompasses the induction of rotational grazing systems, precision agriculture apparatus, and machinery engineered to transition conventional farms towards a future embracing no-till residue management strategies. 

Moreover, for initiatives like the Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) and the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) programs, where the USDA and the producer evenly split the execution costs, producers can expediently utilize the farm loan to cover their share of expenses — always in harmony with the sanctioned loan purpose. 

Additional Climate-Smart Applications for Farm Loans 

Beyond what’s already been mentioned, your farm loans can be intelligently applied to bolster investments in an even wider range of climate-smart agriculture practices and equipment. Let’s delve into some more ways this can be achieved: 

• Precision Agriculture Equipment
  If you’re a producer eligible for a term operating loan, these funds can be directed towards the procurement of high-precision agricultural equipment. This might encompass assets like GPS globes for accurate seed drilling, or monitors to keep track of key farming parameters. You may also consider strip-till fertilizer equipment, a crucial component to curb soil erosion.
• Cover Crops
  An annual operating loan is accessible by qualifying producers for the covering of seed costs. This loan aids in cultivating cover crops to boost soil fertility and curb erosion, proving to be a valuable investment in the long run.
• No/Reduced Till
  Applying a term operating loan towards the acquisition of no-till or reduced-till equipment is another practical approach. Not only does it promote sustainable farming, it also contributes significantly to soil conservation efforts.
• Livestock Facility Improvements
  Your farm ownership loans could be your key to financing capital improvements for livestock facilities. You could use these funds to set up air scrubbers or waste treatment systems, making your farm more environment-friendly while ensuring healthier livestock.
• Cross Fencing
  Cross fencing is an effective strategy for pasture management and rotational grazing which can significantly enhance your farming efficiency. An annual or term operating loan could be employed to acquire and install such fencing systems.

By exploring these diverse avenues of climate-smart agriculture funded by your farm loans, you are not only improving your operations but also contributing to a greener future for farming. Learn more about these opportunities by visiting the Climate-Smart Agriculture and Forestry webpage. Explore in-depth examples that illustrate how an FSA farm loan can bolster your commitment to pioneering climate-smart agricultural practices. 

Summary: The Farm Service Agency (FSA) provides farm loan programs to help farmers launch, expand, or maintain their family agricultural ventures. These loans can support investments in environmentally conscious practices and equipment, such as rotational grazing systems, precision agriculture apparatus, and machinery for no-till residue management. Producers can also use the loans to cover expenses for initiatives like the Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) and the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), where the USDA and producer share execution costs. Farm loans can be applied to a wider range of climate-smart agriculture practices and equipment, such as purchasing high-precision agricultural equipment, covering seed costs, acquiring no-till or reduced-till equipment, financing capital improvements for livestock facilities, and enhancing farming efficiency through cross fencing. By exploring these diverse avenues of climate-smart agriculture funded by farm loans, farmers can improve their operations and contribute to a greener future for farming.

A dairy worker in Texas is being treated for bird flu, the second human case in the United States of an illness caused by a highly virulent virus that has recently rampaged through dairy cows in five states. The patient, who experienced eye inflammation as the only symptom, was tested for flu late last week, with confirmatory testing performed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention over the weekend. The patient was told to isolate and is being treated with oseltamivir, an antiviral drug sold under the brand name Tamiflu. The newly emerged case does not change the risk for the general public, which remains low, federal officials said.

The case has alarmed disease trackers monitoring for the worst-case scenario: human-to-human transmission of the pathogen, which has happened infrequently worldwide, typically among family members engaged in work with animals. It raises questions about whether this pathogen is now more easily transmitted among mammals. Texas health officials are working with other state and federal agencies to provide guidance to dairies about precautions workers should take to minimize the risk of transmission from animals and encourage those who become ill to get tested.

The investigation into how widely the virus has spread is ongoing, and officials do not yet know the specific route of transmission. While the CDC considers the risk of infection for the general public to be low, people with close or prolonged, unprotected exposures to infected birds or other animals (including livestock) or to environments contaminated by infected birds or other animals are at greater risk of infection.

Human infections with avian influenza viruses are uncommon but have occurred sporadically worldwide. The CDC has been monitoring for illness among people exposed to H5 virus-infected birds since outbreaks were first detected in U.S. wild birds and poultry in 2021.

Human illnesses with H5N1 bird flu have ranged from mild, such as eye infections and upper respiratory symptoms, to severe illness, such as pneumonia, that have resulted in death in other countries. Experts worry about the potential for viral evolution, which could remain primarily a threat to animal health and then recede, continue to circulate among animals but not routinely infect humans, or evolve to spread easily between people and become the next pandemic, with significant costs to human life, society, and the global economy.

Pandemic flu is a rapidly changing virus that can easily spread between humans and other mammalian species, with little or no natural immunity. The H5N1 bird flu, which has rarely infected humans, has a fatality rate of around 50% among cases diagnosed. U.S. policymakers must be proactive to prevent this strain from spreading quickly, as there is no immunity in humans and transmission would be fast.

Bird flu is different from the influenza virus that affects humans, and seasonal flu vaccines do not protect against avian viruses. The CDC, the U.S. Agriculture Department, and the Food and Drug Administration are closely monitoring developments, with a tool that gauges how likely bird flu will efficiently spread between humans. HPAI, or highly pathogenic avian influenza, has been found in a baby goat in Minnesota, the first case in U.S. livestock.

The virus was detected in dairy herds in Texas and Kansas on March 25, and testing showed the genetic clade to be the same that is widespread among birds globally. Since then, bird flu has spread to additional herds in at least five states, adding evidence that the virus may be spreading cow-to-cow. The strain was confirmed in a Michigan dairy on March 29 and in a New Mexico dairy on April 1, and presumptive positive tests have also been reported from Idaho.

Preliminary analysis has not found mutations that would make these viruses resistant to FDA-approved antiviral medications for flu. The United States has a small amount of bird flu vaccine targeted an earlier bird flu strain, part of a program to prepare for strains of influenza virus with pandemic potential. With the latest spread of bird flu, vaccine candidates are being developed and tested that are expected to match the current strain.

Highly pathogenic avian influenza has been confirmed in a large commercial dairy in central Michigan, following cattle from an affected premises in Texas. The cattle left Texas on March 7 and did not appear ill. The first animals to be ill were on March 20th, and the initial screening diagnosis was on the 26th. Michigan’s state veterinarian, Dr. The commercial milk supply remains safe due to federal animal health requirements and pasteurization. The virus’s genome sequence is being monitored to determine if the threat to mammals has increased. The affected premises voluntarily stopped the movement of all animals. The Idaho State Department of Agriculture confirmed highly pathogenic avian influenza in a dairy cattle operation, and the affected facility also imported cattle from another state with cases of HPAI. Operations are encouraged to implement enhanced biosecurity measures and closely monitor herds.

The highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) virus outbreak began in 2022, with H5N1 being the primary strain. The virus has been identified in wild birds in every US state and has also affected domestic birds and other wild mammals, such as red foxes and skunks. Cases of affected ruminants were only recently reported, and are thought to be the first US detections of HPAI in domestic ruminants. On March 20, the Minnesota Board of Animal Health reported that a juvenile goat, which lived on a farm with a HPAI-positive poultry flock, had tested positive for the same virus, specifically the H5N1 strain. The investigation began when the owner of the farm notified the Board of Animal Health of unusual deaths of newly-kidded goats on the property. State veterinarian Dr. Brian Hoefs said the diagnosis was significant because it highlights the possibility of the virus infecting other animals on farms with multiple species.

The Texas Department of Agriculture was looking to identify a mystery illness affecting dairy cattle in the state. On March 25, the Texas Agriculture Commissioner confirmed the disease was caused by a strain of HPAI. The US Department of Agriculture (USDA) announced it was “investigating an illness among primarily older dairy cows in Texas, Kansas, and New Mexico”, with samples collected for further testing from two farms in Texas and two in Kansas.

Both the USDA and veterinarians agree that the virus has likely been introduced on US dairy farms by wild birds. Dr. Alex Hamberg, Bureau Director of the Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture, revealed during an update for Pennsylvania dairy farmers on Wednesday, March 27, that the sequencing of the samples collected from Texas and Kansas farms matched the avian influenza that is circulating in the Central and Western Flyways or Pacific Flyways. He said that the most likely way that this virus is introduced is through wild birds, specifically waterfowl, which carry the biggest risk of transmitting the virus.

There is no evidence at this point to support transmission amongst dairy cattle. Genetically, this virus does not carry indicators that it would transmit easily to humans. It is likely that cattle are dead-end hosts, meaning that when a pathogen enters a dead-end host, its ability to spread beyond that animal is relatively low. USDA also confirmed that testing by the National Veterinary Services Laboratories found that the virus hadn’t evolved to be more transmissible to humans, meaning that the current risk to the public remains low.

Dairy cows and milk production are affected by the virus, with reduced feed intake, reduced rumen motility, and reduced bulk tank milk. About 10% of cows become more severely ill, and some will dry off very quickly or produce thicker colostrum-like milk. While there have been reports of some cows culled early due to not returning to production, most of these cows can return to production.

As for whether asymptomatic cattle could harbor the virus, Dr. Hamberg said that from testing done so far, the answer to this is negative.

The US Department of Agriculture (USDA) has stated that there is no concern about the safety of commercial milk supplies due to the HPAI outbreak. Milk from impacted animals is being diverted or destroyed, and pasteurization inactivates the virus, ensuring that only pasteurized milk can enter interstate commerce. Dr. Alex Hamberg explained that the abnormal milk coming out of affected cows is decreasing, making it unlikely to make it into the bulk tank. Pasteurization also inactivates the virus, so there is no risk for consumers.

A major impact on milk supply and dairy prices is not expected since the outbreak has affected only a small number of farms. Farm owners and workers are encouraged to stay vigilant and monitor their herds for any symptoms and contact their veterinarian if signs of illness are detected. Supportive care for animals that have contracted the disease is recommended, including isolation, reducing sources of stress, monitoring feed and water intake, and ensuring they are not dehydrated.

To manage bird populations, farmers should address the three reasons why birds come to farms: food, shelter, and water. This can be done by removing natural food sources, blocking bird access to cattle feed, removing bird feeders near the property, ensuring proper disposal of waste that can draw in birds of prey, limiting vehicle access to areas close to a water source, reducing access to areas for perching, eliminating areas with standing water, fencing cattle away from ponds, and limiting the use of unfiltered surface water for cattle.

Implementing biosecurity measures is now more important than ever, with farmer workers told to use boot covers, keep logs of who enters and exits the property, and disinfect footwear between farms. If visiting areas with a lot of waterfowl feces, consider a car wash or disinfecting clothing and boots before moving on to another farm.

There are no movement controls associated with cattle coming out of Texas and USDA is not supporting movement controls. However, veterinarians are asking for reports of suspect cases and are still developing the response protocol for this specific incident. As the investigation continues and authorities look at multiple factors that likely caused the outbreak, there is no firm timeline on when the investigation will reach a conclusion. Key takeaways so far include that the virus affects older, mid-lactation cows who tend to recover in 10 to 14 days, pasteurization inactivates the virus, and dairy cows appear to be dead-end hosts, meaning that transmission doesn’t occur beyond them, either cow to cow or cow to human.

Ontario’s farm organizations and agriculture minister are urging the federal government to pause the upcoming increase in the carbon tax, set to increase by 23% on April 1. The letter, co-signed by the leaders of Ontario’s commodity organizations, the Ontario Federation of Agriculture, the Christian Farmers Federation of Ontario, the Union des Cuiltivateurs Franco-Ontariens, Food and Beverage Ontario, Canada Protein Ingredients Ltd., and the Ontario Agri-business Association, states that the federal carbon tax increases are causing Ontario’s ability to produce food for a growing population and meet export opportunities. The Grain Farmers of Ontario (GFO) also called on the federal government to institute a grain drying exemption to the carbon tax ahead of the April 1, 2024 increase. The GFO chair, Jeff Harrison, emphasized that farmers are rightfully concerned that they are being penalized for drying their grain when they have no alternatives.

The National Milk Producers Federation, the largest U.S. dairy-farmer organization and the industry’s premier policy voice in Washington, submitted its final, formal legal “brief” on their behalf for Federal Milk Marketing Order (FMMO) modernization to USDA.

The NMPF brief, which was submitted March 29 and hand-delivered to USDA today, emphasized that those farmers are the reason the system exists — and that, by law, their priorities are pre-eminent in USDA consideration of a final plan.

“Our proposed package of proposals to the Federal Milk Marketing Order align thoroughly with its mission and purpose, which were intended to put farmers first,” said Gregg Doud, president and CEO of NMPF. “We’ve spent nearly three years painstakingly assembling the broad consensus among dairy farmers that modernization needs to succeed. Our approach is careful and comprehensive, and it benefits farmers of all regions and types of operations.”

NMPF’s proposals include:

• Returning to the “higher of” Class I mover;
• Discontinuing the use of barrel cheese in the protein component price formula;
• Extending the current 30-day reporting limit to 45 days on forward priced sales on nonfat dry milk and dry whey to capture more exports sales in the USDA product price reporting;
• Updating milk component factors for protein, other solids and nonfat solids in the Class III and Class IV skim milk price formulas;
• Developing a process to ensure make-allowances are reviewed more frequently through legislation directing USDA to conduct mandatory plant-cost studies every two years;
• Updating dairy product manufacturing allowances contained in the USDA milk price formulas; and
• Updating the Class I differential price system to reflect changes in the cost of delivering bulk milk to fluid processing plants.

In contrast to proposals driven by narrow self-interest, NMPF’s package of proposals reflect its broad-based membership and consensus-driven approach, which resulted in unanimous approval from its Board of Directors last year. With that unity unbroken, Doud said he looked forward to USDA’s consideration of NMPF’s solid hearing record which was built along with its recently submitted brief, as well as the department’s recommended decision expected at the beginning of July.

“NMPF has taken seriously its role as the policy leader for U.S. dairy farmers and the cooperatives they own, and we continue to draw on the strength of our members,” he said. “Today we’ve taken another big step toward modernization. We continue to look forward to its successful conclusion.”

Cows in the Texas Panhandle have tested positive for the bird flu, marking the first time the disease has been found in livestock. The U.S. Secretary of Agriculture and the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service confirmed strains of Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza, or bird flu, on Monday. Similar outbreaks have been reported at dairies in Kansas and New Mexico.

The dairy industry is critical for Texas, which ranks fourth in the U.S. for milk production and contributes roughly $50 billion to the state’s economy. In the Panhandle, more than 1.3 billion gallons of milk are produced each year, with the highest rates in Hartley, Castro, and Moore counties.

The disease is causing a decrease in milk production, thicker, colostrum-like milk, and reduced appetite in cows. Infected herds are expected to lose up to 40% of their milk production for 7-10 days until they recover from their symptoms. On average, about 10% of each affected herd appears to be infected.

Milk loss from infected cows is “too limited” to have a major impact on supply. The USDA has not specified if any cows have died from the disease, and experts say it can be difficult to track as dairies are also culling cattle for other reasons.

Multiple agencies are working quickly to monitor the affected herds and conduct additional testing. The disease moves quickly from bird to bird, but experts say it is uncommon for dairy herds. The USDA believes the disease appears to have been introduced to the herds by deceased wild birds.

The animal health commission is working with the federal agriculture department and the Texas A&M Veterinary Medical Diagnostic Laboratory to continue evaluating the situation. Experts recommend limiting the number of people entering dairies to employees and essential workers only and using biosecurity resources. Other signs for dairy producers to watch for include abnormal, tacky feces, low appetite, and fever.

The US Department of Agriculture (USDA) has confirmed that the mystery illness that first struck older dairy cattle in the Texas panhandle is highly pathogenic avian influenza, commonly known as bird flu. The confirmation came after milk from sick animals tested positive for the virus. USDA, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and veterinary and public health officials are now conducting an investigation and have encouraged farmers to monitor and report cattle illnesses quickly.

Symptoms of the illness include sudden decrease in lactation, thicker milk, a drop in feed consumption, and in some cases, pneumonia and mastitis. The symptoms last between 10 and 14 days, with animals recovering on their own, thus not requiring culling of herds similar to what takes place in the poultry sector when birds are affected by the virus. Farmers who observe clinical signs in their herd consistent with this outbreak should immediately contact their veterinarian. Veterinarians who observe these clinical signs and have ruled out other diagnoses on a client’s farm should contact the state veterinarian and plan to submit a complete set of samples to be tested at a diagnostic laboratory.

For dairies whose herds are exhibiting symptoms, on average about 10% of each affected herd appears to be impacted, with little to no associated mortality reported among the animals. Milk loss resulting from symptomatic cattle to date is ‘too limited’ to have a major impact on supply and there should be no impact on the price of milk or other dairy products. The disease doesn’t appear to affect dry cows.

Industry bodies warn against ‘unnecessary or unfair’ impacts to trade. The National Milk Producers Federation (NMPF), the International Dairy Foods Association (IDFA), the U.S. Dairy Export Council (USDEC), and Dairy Management Inc. (DMI) said that enhanced biosecurity protocols were underway on dairy farms.

In the bustling world of dairy products, Hayley and Stephanie Painter have carved out a niche with their innovative yogurt company, blending tradition with modern culinary trends. Their journey from farm to spoon exemplifies the spirit of entrepreneurship, sustainability, and dedication to quality. Let’s delve into the story behind their successful venture.

Founding Principles: Hayley and Stephanie, sisters with a passion for wholesome food and sustainable agriculture, grew up on their family’s dairy farm. Inspired by their upbringing and a desire to create something truly exceptional, they embarked on a mission to produce artisanal yogurt using locally sourced, organic ingredients.

The Journey Begins: Armed with a vision and a commitment to excellence, the Painters set out to transform their dreams into reality. They started small, experimenting with recipes in their farmhouse kitchen and sourcing high-quality milk from their family’s dairy herd. Their dedication to quality and attention to detail quickly garnered praise from family and friends, sparking the idea to commercialize their yogurt.

Building the Brand: With a clear vision and a delicious product in hand, Hayley and Stephanie set about building their brand. They crafted a name that reflected their values of authenticity and craftsmanship, and their vibrant packaging showcased the natural beauty of their rural surroundings. Through farmer’s markets, word-of-mouth, and social media, they began to attract a loyal following of health-conscious consumers seeking a truly wholesome yogurt experience.

Sustainable Sourcing: Central to the Painters’ ethos is a commitment to sustainable sourcing practices. They forged partnerships with local farmers and suppliers who shared their dedication to organic farming and animal welfare. By prioritizing locally sourced ingredients and minimizing their carbon footprint, they not only ensured the freshness and quality of their products but also supported their community’s agricultural economy.

Innovation and Adaptation: As their yogurt gained popularity, Hayley and Stephanie remained committed to innovation, constantly experimenting with new flavors and product lines. They embraced consumer feedback and market trends, introducing dairy-free alternatives and exploring partnerships with like-minded artisans. Their willingness to adapt and evolve has been key to staying ahead in a competitive industry while staying true to their values.

Community Engagement: Beyond their commitment to quality and sustainability, the Painters are deeply invested in their community. They host farm tours, educational workshops, and tasting events, inviting customers to connect with the source of their food and learn about the art of yogurt making. Their genuine passion for their craft and dedication to transparency have fostered a sense of trust and loyalty among their customers.

Looking to the Future: As they look to the future, Hayley and Stephanie remain steadfast in their commitment to producing the highest quality yogurt while staying true to their roots. They envision expanding their reach while maintaining the integrity and authenticity that have defined their brand from the beginning. With their unwavering dedication and entrepreneurial spirit, the Painters are poised to continue making waves in the world of dairy, one spoonful at a time.

The University of Guelph is set to launch a new, interdisciplinary Master of Sustainable Agriculture (MSAg) program starting in summer 2025. The 16-month program will equip students with the latest advancements and skills in sustainable agriculture, data analysis, and agri-tech innovations through graduate-level course work. Students will focus on plant agriculture, livestock agriculture, or environmental sciences during the program, providing a broad exploration of the various facets of the agriculture sector and how to mitigate its impact on the environment.

Course offerings are flexible, and professional development opportunities allow students to customize their studies to match their career aspirations. Courses include social science courses in agricultural economics, change communication, and leadership, giving students a broad perspective of sustainability and how to drive change in the sector. Experiential learning is a major component of the program, including hands-on field courses and site visits to major agricultural operations throughout Ontario. Students will also have the opportunity to participate in an internship to work on projects for agricultural organizations to help bolster their sustainability efforts.

The skills and training graduates receive will help build a more sustainable Canadian agricultural sector, as Canadian food producers transition to smart machines and focus on strategy and systems. Nevin McDougall, managing partner of RHA Ventures Inc., said that this new program will help develop future professionals who possess the skills necessary to address the demand for more sustainable production practices. Prospective students are encouraged to contact the OAC admissions team.

Statement from the National Milk Producers Federation (NMPF), the International Dairy Foods Association (IDFA), the U.S. Dairy Export Council (USDEC) and Dairy Management Inc. (DMI)

Earlier today, the U.S. Department of Agriculture confirmed highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) in two dairy cattle herds in Texas and two herds in Kansas. 

Importantly, USDA confirmed that there is no threat to human health and milk and dairy products remain safe to consume. Pasteurization (high heat treatment) kills harmful microbes and pathogens in milk, including the influenza virus.

Also, routine testing and well-established protocols for U.S. dairy will continue to ensure that only safe milk enters the food supply. In keeping with the federal Grade “A” Pasteurized Milk Ordinance (PMO), milk from sick cows must be collected separately and is not allowed to enter the food supply chain. This means affected dairy cows are segregated, as is normal practice with any animal health concern, and their milk does not enter the food supply.

Consumers in the United States and around the world can remain confident in the safety and quality of U.S. dairy.

Enhanced Biosecurity Protocols Underway on U.S. Dairy Farms

As information related to an illness affecting dairy cows in several states began to circulate over the past two weeks, USDA’s Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) worked with state veterinary authorities as well as federal partners including the FDA to swiftly identify and respond to detections and mitigate the virus’ impact on U.S. dairy production. Dairy farmers also have begun implementing enhanced biosecurity protocols on their farms, limiting the amount of traffic into and out of their properties and restricting visits to employees and essential personnel. Avian influenza is an animal health issue, not a human health concern. Importantly, mammals including cows do not spread avian influenza—it requires birds as the vector of transmission and it’s extremely rare for the virus to affect humans because most people will never have direct and prolonged contact with an infected bird, especially on a dairy farm. As a precaution, dairy farmers are taking important measures to protect their workers.

The National Dairy FARM Program (NDFP) offers several valuable biosecurity resources providing dairy farmers with tools to keep their cattle and dairy businesses safe, including:
• Everyday Biosecurity Reference Manual
• Enhanced Biosecurity Prep Guide 
• Herd Health Plan Protocol Template – Biosecurity
• Animal Movement Log
• People Entry Log

Biosecurity practices guidance is available here.

Dairy farmers who observe clinical signs in their herd consistent with this outbreak, such as a significant loss of animal appetite and rumination or an acute drop in milk production, should immediately contact their veterinarian. Veterinarians who observe these clinical signs and have ruled out other diagnoses on a client’s farm should contact the state veterinarian and plan to submit a complete set of samples to be tested at a diagnostic laboratory.

What is Pasteurization? 

Pasteurization is a process that kills harmful bacteria and pathogens, including viruses, by heating milk to a specific temperature for a set period of time. The processing of milk products involves pasteurization of the raw milk to a minimum of 161.5˚F for 15 seconds and then immediately cooling it. Ultra pasteurization is a process that heats milk at a higher temperature for specified times to extend a product’s shelf life.

What is Avian Influenza? 

Detections of avian influenza in birds, including chickens, are common in the United States in the spring and fall due to wild birds spreading the virus as they migrate to and from their seasonal homes. While it is uncommon for Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza to affect dairy cows, USDA APHIS has been tracking detections of HPAI in mammals for many years in the United States, leading dairy farmers and veterinarians in the United States to prepare for this eventuality. As a result, dairy farmers have taken immediate measures to enhance biosecurity measures in and around dairy farms to keep the food supply safe.

About the Illness in Cows

Dairy producers with affected cows are reporting a rapid onset illness in herds, specifically among older, lactating cows. Clinical signs include:

• Decreased herd level milk production
• Acute sudden drop in production
• Decrease in feed consumption
• Abnormal feces and some fever
• Older cows may be more likely to be severely impacted than younger cows

According to dairy farmers and veterinarians reporting on affected herds, most affected cows recover within two to three weeks.

Information for Affected Producers 

Producers who believe dairy cattle within their herd are showing the clinical signs described above should report these signs immediately to state veterinarians. Animals may also be reported to APHIS’ toll-free number at 1-866-536-7593.

Trade and Exports

The U.S. dairy industry will continue to work with the U.S. federal government, trading partners and the World Organization for Animal Health (WOAH) to encourage adherence to WOAH standards and minimize all unnecessary or unfair trade impacts. It is essential that trading partners do not impose bans or restrictions on the international trade of dairy commodities in response to these and future notifications and rely on the science-based food safety steps taken in U.S. dairy processing, namely pasteurization, in preserving market access.

The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) are investigating an illness affecting older dairy cows in Texas, Kansas, and New Mexico. Unpasteurized clinical samples of milk from sick cattle collected from two dairy farms in Kansas and one in Texas, as well as an oropharyngeal swab from another dairy in Texas, have tested positive for highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI). Additional testing was initiated on Friday, March 22, and over the weekend because farms have also reported finding deceased wild birds on their properties. Initial testing by the National Veterinary Services Laboratories has not found changes to the virus that would make it more transmissible to humans, indicating that the current risk to the public remains low. Federal and state agencies are conducting additional testing for HPAI and viral genome sequencing to better understand the situation.

At this stage, there is no concern about the safety of the commercial milk supply or that this circumstance poses a risk to consumer health. Dairies are required to send only milk from healthy animals into processing for human consumption, and pasteurization has proven to inactivate bacteria and viruses, like influenza, in milk. Federal agencies are working with state and industry partners to encourage farmers and veterinarians to report cattle illnesses quickly to monitor potential additional cases and minimize the impact on farmers, consumers, and other animals.

The disease has caused a drop in milk production and unusual milk appearance, with some cows showing signs of fever, mastitis, or pneumonia. Production may be reduced for seven to 10 days until symptoms subside. The Texas Department of Agriculture is not predicting depopulation of dairy herds, as cattle are expected to fully recover. Symptoms are most common in older, mid-lactation cows, with no reported cases in calves, heifers, or dry cows. The state is urging all Texas dairies to adhere to strict biosecurity protocols, including limiting farm access to essential personnel, disinfecting vehicles, isolating affected animals, and destroying contaminated milk. Additionally, waterers should be cleaned and disinfected, and drinking water should be isolated from waterfowl-contaminated water sources.

The Oregon Department of Agriculture has withdrawn its decision to require small dairy operations to apply for a permit usually intended for larger commercial farms. This change came after dairy industry lobbyists complained that some small dairy farms had an unfair competitive advantage over bigger farms that had to follow state regulations and pay annual fees. In its 2023 decision, the state department of agriculture determined small dairy farms met its definition of a CAFO since farmers usually have to confine or tie up cows while they’re being milked.

The rule would have required small dairy farms to install expensive drainage systems, put in wastewater holdings tanks, keep daily records, pay annual fees starting at $125, on top of a $100 application fee, or face fines up to $10,000 if they didn’t comply. Christine Anderson, who milks three cows and owns Cast Iron Farm in Yamhill County, said it just doesn’t make sense to regulate small dairy farms or homesteaders with a handful of cows, sheep, or goats the same way as larger farms.

Wastewater plans and CAFO regulations are necessary for larger farms that produce tons of manure, but smaller dairy farms don’t impact the environment as much as bigger farms do. Sarah King, who runs Godspeed Hollow Farm in Newberg, said that smaller dairy farms serve local communities and families that don’t have food access.

The state agency’s decision follows a lawsuit filed by Anderson, King, and two other dairy farmers. The case seeks to stop the agency from enforcing the regulation, which would have kicked in April 1. Since the withdrawal is only temporary and the department is not conceding that it lacked the power to enforce the new requirements, the lawsuit, filed by the nonprofit Institute for Justice, will continue in federal court.

Apple has revolutionized consumer technology by focusing on user-friendly interfaces, data security, access, sustainability, and recycling. The company’s focus extends beyond packaging to include intuitive icons and menus for new adopters, aiming to democratize technology for all. Apple has also prioritized data security, access, sustainability, and recycling, addressing user concerns as they evolve.

Farmers are increasingly exposed to new app-based technology, offering numerous benefits. However, these technologies face challenges such as harsh environments, rodents attacking wiring, unpredictable animals damaging the technology attached to it, and electrical issues. The traditional Silicon Valley approach of “fake it till you make it” is not an option, leading to both AgTech business failure and farmer fatigue with overpromised solutions.

Farmers often struggle with the user interfaces produced by AgTech companies, which are well beyond the capabilities of small and young AgTech firms. This results in farmers investing in new technology but rarely realizing its potential. For example, 25% of cows wear some form of device or sensor, but only mention “heat detection.” Smart tractors have been around for two decades, but data scientists report that the main function used is tracking when the tractor is running and when it is off. Providers of sensors, smart cameras, robotics, and IoT devices installed in livestock farms struggle to provide devices resistant to cleaning and environmental contaminants.

Broadband for control and monitoring is not always available in rural areas. The risk of a data breach is a real problem in most of the technology world, but farm data is less valued and less protected due to the vulnerability to hacking on farms. Agricultural tech platforms often provide huge quantities of data, but meaningful insights are often obscured by too much, too detailed, or untimely data. Farmers often have to work to generate actionable data, such as alerting cows about feed shortages, delayed rumination, lameness, acidosis, and individual changes in nutrition or culling practices.

Despite the perception that farmers are reluctant to adopt technology, since the advent of the plow, they have always innovated. Producers today are increasingly familiar with automation and eager to be the first to install the next big thing, but they don’t love technology for technology’s sake. Farmers want technology that addresses real problems and is user-friendly. As producer Chad Swindoll commented, “Agriculture doesn’t have an innovation problem. It has an implementation problem.”

The current hope for AI is that it can pull out meaningful data, improve the user experience, and anticipate user needs. Apple has expanded consumers’ expectations of simplicity in using technology, which has affected the expectations of farmers. An important aspect of Apple’s revolutionary impact is its emphasis on design and user experience, as well as its commitment to being at the forefront of industry standards.

The dairy processing plant HP Hood, located in Lynnfield, Massachusetts, plans to invest $120 million in expanding its Batavia, New York, location. The current plant is 448,185 square feet; the addition of 32,500 square feet would boost its capacity by 10%, or 20 million gallons of dairy products annually. As a result, the factory will produce close to 150 million gallons a year. New batching and processing equipment will also be a part of the development, enabling the business to start a new manufacturing line and boost capacity. Because it will help to develop the dairy center in the northeast, the project is anticipated to have a positive impact on the agriculture industry as well as the Genesee Valley Agri-Business Park.

Applications are being accepted for college scholarships that are awarded by America’s dairy farmers and importers through the National Dairy Promotion and Research Board (NDB).

Eleven scholarships worth $2,500 each will be awarded, in addition to a $3,500 James H. Loper Jr. Memorial Scholarship to one outstanding recipient. NDB funds, in part, Dairy Management Inc. (DMI), which manages the national dairy checkoff program.

Undergraduate students in their sophomore through senior year for the 2024-25 academic school year and enrolled in college/university programs that emphasize dairy are eligible. Relevant majors may include: communications/public relations, journalism, marketing, business, economics, nutrition, food science and agriculture education.

Scholarships are awarded based on academic achievement, an interest in a career in a dairy-related discipline, and demonstrated leadership, initiative and integrity. Candidates must complete an application form, submit an official transcript of all college courses, and write a short statement describing their career aspirations, dairy-related activities and work experiences.

Applications can be found at usdairy.com/about-us/dmi/scholarship

Completed applications must be received no later than May 31, 2024, at 11:59 p.m. CST. Questions about the program can be submitted to ndbscholarships@dairy.org

Dairy Management Inc.™ (DMI) is funded by America’s more than 26,000 dairy farmers, as well as dairy importers. Created to help increase sales and demand for dairy products, DMI and its related organizations work to increase demand for dairy through research, education and innovation, and to maintain confidence in dairy foods, farms and businesses. DMI manages the National Dairy Council and the American Dairy Association and founded the U.S. Dairy Export Council and the Innovation Center for U.S. Dairy.

The Wisconsin Dairy Alliance has filed an appeal against the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources over pollution discharge elimination system licenses. The initial complaint argued that the DNR lacked the jurisdiction to require farmers to get licenses under the state’s water quality statutes. Calumet County Judge Carey Reed dismissed this argument in January. Kim Bremmer of Venture Dairy Cooperative feels that farmers should not be required to get a discharge permit if they are not dischargers. Bremmer believes their appeal will be successful based on prior court decisions, since the federal Supreme Court has ruled against the EPA using identical wording. Bremmer thinks the state should halt polluters, but Wisconsin already has the nation’s strictest water regulatory regulations for big farms, and they are not polluting the state’s rivers. The Wisconsin Manufacturers and Commerce Litigation Center is handling the appeals case.

Charles Wayne Lutz, 72, of Mocksville, was unexpectedly called to his heavenly home on Sunday, March 10, 2024.

Wayne was born on January 31, 1952, in Catawba County, to the late Charles Lewis and Ethel McLail Compton Lutz. Wayne was a member of First United Methodist Church. He was raised on the family Jersey dairy farm, to which he returned upon graduation from NC State in 1974. Wayne relocated to Davie County in 1979, renting the dairy facility owned by Richard and Mable Allen. In 1981, he purchased Deerview Jersey Farm at its current location off of Cana Road. He milked pure bred Jerseys until his semi-retirement in 2017, retaining enough heifers to allow his grandchildren to participate in dairy livestock shows. Wayne was known as loving, funny and genuinely kind by those lucky to share his life.

In his youth, he was an accomplished 4-Her, honing his dairy judging and showing skills at local, regional and national level. Later he was a frequent judge of the same, judging in excess of 300+ county and district dairy shows. Wayne took immense pleasure is working with and promoting youth activities.

He was honored to be inducted into the NC State Fair Livestock Hall of Fame, having exhibited at every NC State Fair since the age of 3 and being Premier Breeder and Exhibitor numerous times; was awarded the Marvin E. Sengar Distinguished Dairy Farmer, as well as Davie County Conservation Family of the Year in 1990 and 2011.

He is preceded in death by his parents, and infant brother, Steven.

He is survived by his wife of 42 years, Karen and their three daughters, Whitney Munden (Christopher) of Advance, Kelsey Daye Lutz (Shamus Eberhardt) of Anacortes, WA, and Avery Lutz of Richmond, VA; siblings, Brenda Lutz of Huntersville, Corey Lutz (Bridgett), and Kevin Lutz; all of Lincolnton; and grandchildren, Coet Munden, Piper Munden, Atlas Munden, Wilder Munden, and Oslo Eberhardt.

A memorial service will be held at 11 am, Thursday, March 14, at Carrigan Farms West entrance 1213 Oakridge Farm Hwy, Mooresville, with Rev. Lori Anne Bowen officiating. The family invites friends visit with them following the service for lunch, fellowship and the celebration of a life well lived.

In lieu of flowers, please consider memorials to Davie High FFA, 180 War Eagle Drive, Mocksville NC 27028.

Online condolences www.lambertfuneralhomenc.com

The fourth World Champion Cheese title, and the third consecutive one, has gone to a little mountain creamery in Switzerland.

Gourmino cheese is made in Bern, Switzerland, by Michael Spycher at Mountain Dairy Fritzenhaus. The river that runs beside the creamery is the inspiration for his Hornbacher cheese. It beat out 3,302 other submissions with a score of 98.98 out of 100.

Joe Salonia of Gourmino was there in Madison, Wisconsin on Thursday when the winner was announced. He explains that the cheese is crafted using milk from local, small farmers. “There are nine or ten dairy farmers within five or six kilometers who will deliver fresh, raw, beautiful Swiss cows milk twice a day.”

The Area of Protection (AOP) contains stringent regulations, according to Salonia, which affect local Swiss farmers. They still need to spend time outside, even in the dead of winter. The cows may eat grass or hay, with a little grain or snack every now and again, but silage—preserved hay—never allowed since it would induce gas bubbles, which would ruin the lengthy ripening process of raw milk cheese.

The majority of the cows milked by the local farmers are Holsteins or Red Fleckviehs, a cross of Simmental and Red Holsteins, according to Salonia.

Four world championships have been won by Michael Spycher’s creamery, with the latest three being consecutive.

On a biannual basis, the Wisconsin Cheese Makers Association holds the World Championship Cheese Contest.