Discover how the Newfoundland and Labrador government is bolstering local agriculture with a $10 million loan to a new dairy co-op. Will this move strengthen the economy?

Today, the Honourable Elvis Loveless, Minister of Fisheries, Forestry and Agriculture, stood with executive members of the newly formed Newfoundland and Labrador Dairy Co-operative at Pondview Farms in Goulds. Here, he announced a significant leap forward for the dairy industry in the province—a $10-million loan to support the co-op’s acquisition of Agropur’s fluid milk processing and distribution facility in Mount Pearl, which includes the central dairies brand. 

In attendance for the announcement were Crosbie Williams, a founding member of the Newfoundland and Labrador Dairy Co-operative, and Scott Antle, the co-op’s President and Chief Administrative Officer. The co-operative comprises 19 dairy producers from across Newfoundland and Labrador who have come together with the mutual goal of strengthening the dairy industry, creating fresh local employment opportunities, and boosting investment in the dairy sector. 

Back in December 2023, the co-operative took a crucial step, signing an agreement to buy the Central Dairies brand. This significant move meant that ownership of the brand could be returned to the province. Owning and operating Central Dairies isn’t the co-operative’s only role, though. They also distribute dairy products—including butter, ice cream, cheese, and cultured products such as sour cream—for Agropur and other processors, providing support for retailers and their customers. Looking ahead, plans are set for the co-operative to broaden the availability of locally produced products, anticipating and addressing the evolving demands of individuals and families in the area. 

By offering a $10 million loan for this initiative, the provincial government is demonstrating its support for ongoing growth, sustainability, and expansion within the Newfoundland and Labrador dairy industry. 

“Our government is very pleased to support and assist the newly formed Newfoundland and Labrador Dairy Co-operative. We work closely with all who are growing our strong, local dairy sector, and the provision of this $10 million loan will contribute to local ownership and local employment, a strengthened economy, and increased food self-sufficiency in Newfoundland and Labrador.” – Honourable Elvis Loveless, Minister of Fisheries, Forestry and Agriculture.

“This is a once-in-a-generation opportunity for Newfoundland and Labrador. For generations, our dairy farmers have delivered safe, high-quality, 100 per cent locally produced milk for our friends and neighbours. That will never change. But now, when you choose Central Dairies, you’re doubling down on the local benefits. You’re choosing a product that is produced, processed, and delivered here, by fellow Newfoundlanders and Labradorians.” – Crosbie Williams, Founding member of the Newfoundland and Labrador Dairy Co-operative and owner of Pond View Farm.

“We’re excited about our investment in the Central Dairies brand and our ongoing relationship with Agropur, but it’s just the beginning. Dairy plays a vital role in Newfoundland and Labrador’s food self-sufficiency. And we’re proud to be leaders, investing and innovating so that more of the food we all love can be manufactured right here at home.” – Scott Antle, President and Chief Administrative Officer, Newfoundland and Labrador Dairy Co-operative.

“We are building a leadership team that understands the unique challenges faced by both trade and household customers and we will be ready to face them head on. The Newfoundland and Labrador Dairy Co-operative is committed to meeting customer needs and is excited to deliver on our promise of getting quality products from our farms to your fridge.” – John Moores, Chief Operating Officer, Newfoundland and Labrador Dairy Co-operative.

Summary: The Newfoundland and Labrador Dairy Co-operative, a group of 19 dairy producers, has secured a $10-million loan from the Minister of Fisheries, Forestry and Agriculture, Elvis Loveless. The loan will help the co-op acquire Agropur’s fluid milk processing and distribution facility in Mount Pearl. The co-op aims to strengthen the dairy industry, create local employment opportunities, and boost investment. In December 2023, the co-op signed an agreement to buy the Central Dairies brand, allowing ownership to be returned to the province. The co-op also distributes dairy products for Agropur and other processors, supporting retailers and customers. The provincial government is demonstrating its support for the dairy industry’s growth, sustainability, and expansion. Crosbie Williams, Founding member of the co-op, expressed excitement about the investment and the ongoing relationship with Agropur.

Discover how AstraZeneca and Vanguard Renewables are turning dairy manure into renewable energy to power U.S. facilities. Can cow waste curb carbon emissions?

Imagine a world where dairy-cow manure and food waste are utilized to decrease our dependence on natural gas, all while simultaneously reducing carbon emissions. In this world, solutions aren’t just imagined, they are initiated and actualized. This is precisely the vision that AstraZeneca, a pioneering United Kingdom-based drug company, is bringing to life. In a robust partnership with Massachusetts-based Vanguard Renewables, the firm is realizing the energy potential of biogas. By 2026, all their U.S-based research and manufacturing facilities are set to harness this transformative power, providing a blueprint for a more sustainable future.

The Partnership: Empowering a Sustainable Revolution 

Since June 2023, AstraZeneca has been on an exciting path towards a sustainable future. This journey began when the company started purchasing renewable natural gas (RNG) from Vanguard Renewables. The linchpin of this vigorous progression lies in their Newark Campus in Delaware. Tasked with the packaging of 26 different medicines and crafting formulations for worldwide distribution, this site was the inauguration point of this green revolution. 

Fast forward to 2026, and it’s clear that the collaboration between AstraZeneca and Vanguard Renewables is poised to cause significant waves in the sphere of environmental conservation. Goals have been set to permit a staggering 650,000 million British thermal units or 190,500 megawatt hours per year of renewable natural gas to be consumed across AstraZeneca’s U.S. sites. To put this into perspective, that’s tantamount to the energy necessary to heat more than 17,800 homes for one year across the United States. 

“At AstraZeneca, we understand the intricate web binding the health of our planet to the well-being of humanity. Hence, we are tenacious in our endeavor to implement deep decarbonization across our operations and the entire value chain,” expresses Pam Cheng, Chief Sustainability Officer at AstraZeneca. This commitment isn’t just about giving back to our planet; it’s about laying a foundation for a sustainable future, one step at a time.

Decarbonizing Healthcare: A Dual Responsibility Towards Patient and Planet 

As you might already know, the production of medicines demands an intensive use of heat and power. Imagining the scale of AstraZeneca’s operations, you can grasp how their carbon footprint can quickly add up; but not if we have anything to say about it. With a paramount goal of decarbonizing healthcare, the onus lies on us to introduce a shift in energy consumption, flipping the traditional, fossil-fuel dependent approach on its head. 

Our effective collaboration with Vanguard Renewables allows you to see a practical example of integrating sustainable practices into pharmaceutical manufacturing. The use of biogas, sourced primarily from dairy manure, has set the company on the right path. The combustion of biogas evolved from dairy cow manure keeps the energy wheel spinning, without adding to the burden of carbon emissions. 

Led by a responsibility for our patients and our planet, AstraZeneca’s Ambition Zero Carbon program serves as our climate pledge. Striving for an impressive reduction of 98% in greenhouse-gas emissions from our global operations by 2026, we’re not just making our mark; we’re setting a precedent for the entire healthcare industry. Standing with us, you have an opportunity to witness the transformation of an ambitious goal into a tangible reality. This isn’t just about us or our industry—it’s about creating a sustainable future for all. 

An Unprecedented Agreement: The Vanguard Renewables’ Farm-Powered Process 

There’s something unique about AstraZeneca’s agreement with Vanguard Renewables: it leverages Vanguard Renewables’ signature ‘farm-powered’ process. Imagine this – Vanguard Renewables teaming up with dairy farmers as well as food and beverage manufacturers, retailers, and distributors on a mission to produce renewable natural gas. Sounds like an impossible task? Not really. 

The secret lies in farm-based anaerobic digestion of food and farm waste, in particular, dairy-cow manure. This process efficiently breaks down the organic material, transforming it into renewable natural gas. The captured gas is then injected into the existing natural-gas infrastructure. 

Innovation at the Core 

Where does this renewable natural gas end up, you may ask? It becomes an integral part of AstraZeneca’s medicine research and manufacturing processes. This innovative solution unfolds a new chapter in revolutionizing energy use in the industry. 

Neil Smith, the Chief Executive Officer at Vanguard Renewables, voiced his positivity about the partnership: “We strongly believe this partnership will provide a path for other like-minded companies to join us on the journey towards global decarbonization.” 

Truly, Vanguard Renewables’ farm-powered process holds the promise of a new beginning. A leaner, cleaner, and more sustainable future beckons us all. Are we ready to answer the call?

On the Ground: Impactful Initiatives that Bolster Local Agriculture 

Think about the local family-owned farms you pass by on weekend drives through the countryside. This groundbreaking collaboration between AstraZeneca and Vanguard Renewables also puts great emphasis on these hardworking farmers, helping them become a part of the solution in the fight against climate change. Methane, a potent greenhouse gas, from these dairy farms would traditionally be discharged into the atmosphere. However, through this initiative, it’s captured and transformed into clean, renewable energy. 

Since 2014, Vanguard Renewables has been actively working with multi-generational dairy farms and food and beverage manufacturers, innovating new ways to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Their primary approach is by diverting food waste from mountaining landfills and capturing the gases released from on-farm emissions. By doing so, they’re effectively providing sustainable solutions to one of the world’s most pressing challenges – greenhouse gas emissions. 

Moreover, participating dairy farmers also benefit from a newfound revenue stream through the land lease agreements. Vanguard Renewables’ innovative approach not only supports regenerative-agricultural practices – the kind that can help heal the planet – but also secures the future of these local family farms. Through this collaboration, we are all making steps toward a sustainable, viable future.

The Bottom Line

As we step into a future marked with an urgent need for sustainability, partnerships like that of AstraZeneca and Vanguard Renewables light the path, showing us what is possible. They are leveraging something as ubiquitous as dairy manure to fuel their war on carbon emissions while upholding the mission of public welfare. It’s a testament to the human capacity for innovative solutions and a resounding example of conscious capitalism at its finest. With the potential to transform agriculture and healthcare sectors, these types of collaborations are just the beginning of a revolution in sustainable practices.

Summary: AstraZeneca, a UK-based drug company, is partnering with Massachusetts-based Vanguard Renewables to harness biogas energy potential. By 2026, all U.S. research and manufacturing facilities will be equipped to harness this transformative power, providing a blueprint for a more sustainable future. The partnership began in June 2023 when AstraZeneca started purchasing renewable natural gas from Vanguard Renewables. By 2026, AstraZeneca’s U.S. sites are set to consume 650,000 million British thermal units or 190,500 megawatt hours per year of renewable natural gas, equivalent to the energy needed to heat over 17,800 homes for one year across the United States. AstraZeneca’s Ambition Zero Carbon program aims for a 98% reduction in greenhouse-gas emissions from their global operations by 2026. The collaboration also emphasizes local family-owned farms, helping them become part of the solution in the fight against climate change.

Concerned about the H5N1 bird flu’s impact on the dairy industry? Discover why Republican lawmakers are urging calm amidst these fears. Stay informed, stay calm.

Whether you’re a farmer, a consumer, or simply a concerned citizen, the recent H5N1 outbreak is, without doubt, a pressing issue. This strain, which was initially linked with birds, has now spread across nine states in the U.S., affecting 36 dairy farms—and triggering alarm in both Democratic and Republican camps about the potential risks for dairy cows and us, the humans who consume their products. 

It’s critical to note though that new tests reveal pasteurized milk remains perfectly safe. Agriculture officials have been quick to respond, vigorously enforcing testing protocols for cattle moved from state to state. Yet the Republican lawmakers have concerns—concerns born from previous experiences. They worry about the potential impact of undue panic on the dairy industry as a whole, particularly in light of the significant blow suffered by the hog industry during the 2009 swine flu outbreak, a dark chapter in agricultural history. 

As Glenn Thompson, Chairman of the House Agriculture Committee, wisely suggests, “A single report of a strain transmission—from bird to human and from bird to cow—can have significant implications in the public mind.” Furthermore, Thompson cites that “The transmission of the current H5N1 strain to a farm worker in Texas is a reminder that caution is necessary but undue alarm is harmful.”

So let’s shed some light on this situation. Scientists and federal officials are clear: viral fragments in pasteurized milk do not appear harmful. Their concern, however, lies with raw milk—a product popular in states such as Thompson’s—which could potentially pose a threat. Sen. Ron Johnson, another prominent Republican voice and critic of the administration’s handling of the Covid-19 pandemic, affirms he has seen H5N1 cases in birds, but none so far in cows. 

True, Republicans aren’t dismissing efforts to reinforce resources to tackle infectious diseases, especially among livestock. Yet officials and farm workers at the state level have voiced concerns of their own about the feasibility of complying with new federal testing mandates for dairy cows. And while the Democratic representatives from states heavily reliant on dairy production are calling for a federal action plan, the farmers themselves struggle to isolate and test their herds. 

In these challenging times, the one message that echoes is this: “Stay calm.” Let’s trust the processes in place, do our part, and remember that safety, for both animals and consumers, is paramount.

The Situation at Hand 

As the avian flu, specifically the H5N1 strain, spreads its wings beyond birds to make a leap into over 36 dairy farms across nine states, both parties, Democrats and Republicans, are urging the Biden administration for rapid, transparent communication about the potential danger it could pose to dairy cattle, and subsequently, to humans. 

It’s important to note that new test outcomes have shown that pasteurized milk remains safe. Additionally, a series of procedures have been implemented to screen cattle that are shifting from state to state. However, Republicans have echoed louder concerns. They fear that the panic around the outbreak may inflict severe damage to the dairy industry, hence the call for calm.

Key Voices in the Discourse 

If you’re thinking about the prevalent discussions concerning the H5N1 bird flu, let’s hear it from a prominent voice in the industry, Glenn Thompson. As the Chairman of the House Agriculture Committee, Thompson’s line of thinking is worth considering. 

“My concern is people’s emotional reactions to the issue,” Thompson carefully expresses. As he navigates through the choppy sea of discussions, Thompson is ready to tug us back to 2009, pointing out an interesting case. The swine flu outbreak at that time, though not related to hogs, swayed a sweeping wave of negativity onto the hog industry. With this historical event as a backdrop, Thompson provides a contextual frame to our current situation. 

As a representative from Pennsylvania, he is sensitively aware of the raw milk scene in this state. Raw milk, a product which enjoys legality and popularity there, is now under Thompson’s watchful eye. With the recent confirmation of the H5N1 strain transmission to a farm worker in Texas, he contemplates the potential risk this could pose to the raw milk industry. 

But what does this mean for you? Stay informed. Listen to voices from both ends of the spectrum. After all, knowledge equips you for calm, informed decision-making in these uncertain times.

The Challenge of Response 

Remarkably, Republicans assert they are not discounting efforts to strengthen infectious disease resources, particularly among livestock. With the current Avian Flu outbreak and the uncertainties that come with it, their emphasis is largely on preparedness rather than panic. They advocate for calm and systematic analysis of information rather than hasty reactions based on partial information.

In strengthening the nation’s response towards these unforeseeable situations, Republicans show their commitment to supporting the dairy industry. Thompson’s committee recently released an outline for the renewal of a significant piece of legislation – the farm bill. This comprehensive package provides oversight and vital support for various agricultural programs. Importantly, it could act as a lifeline for the dairy industry which is currently navigating new requirements for testing and surveillance due to the H5N1 outbreak.

No situation is entirely without challenge. Yet, with an emphasis on sound scientific conclusions and a robust federal support system, the Republicans believe that the agricultural sector — dairy farmers especially — can weather this storm. What is required from you? Keep calm, stay informed, and support local agricultural industries as they navigate these challenging times.

Investing in Animal Health and the Dairy Industry  

While it’s true that the situation is fraught with complexity and financial redistribution, the priority clearly remains the health of the animals, the survival of the dairy industry, and public safety. Sen. Thompson, known for his agricultural advocacy, is spearheading an initiative to substantially increase funding in these pillars of animal health: research, infrastructure, and personnel. 

“We’re essentially aiming to double our investment in this trifecta of animal health,” Thompson shared with STAT. This bold maneuver proposes a generous $2 billion in funding and reportedly garners extensive backing. 

But there’s a bump in the road. Implementing these initiatives is hinging upon the Farm Bill’s pending markup by Thompson’s committee in May, and the finalization of the new federal budget. But waiting again seems to be a game the dairy industry knows all too well. 

A wave of apprehension is quickly washing over the scene, as state health officials and farm workers voice their concerns. They’re feeling the pressure to keep up with the new federal testing requirements for dairy cows. Until we see a definitive solution, it’s clear that the health of our animals, the resilience of our hardworking dairy farmers, and the quality of the milk on your table continue to hang in the balance.

Fear or Preparedness? The Political Response

As the dairy industry begins to feel the strained weight of the H5N1 bird flu outbreak, there’s an escalating sense of confusion. Fear or preparedness? That’s where the real question lies. Democrats hailing from states heavily reliant on milk production are stepping forward, urging the implementation of a federal action plan. Their aim? To bolster the support for farmers grappling with the necessity to sequester and test their herds efficiently and effectively. 

But, balancing the scales, there’s a unifying message resounding from the Republican camp: remain calm. Leading the charge is Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-La.), the highest-ranking Republican on the Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee. He’s not remaining idle, mind you. Cassidy is actively seeking comprehensive briefings on bird flu developments from both federal health and agricultural officials. 

Is he concerned? Yes. But he’s not surrendering to alarm just yet. While Cassidy acknowledges the need for a greater understanding of the potential risks, he’s expressing confidence in the current monitoring measures in place. In his words, “they are appropriately monitoring it.” 

As the dairy industry finds itself on the precipice of a new challenge, the push and pull of fear and preparedness continue to play out on the political stage. The road ahead may be daunting, but we’re not alone on this journey.  Together, we’ll navigate the challenges and protect the industry we all rely on.

The Importance of Staying Informed and Taking Action 

There’s profound truth in the words of Nigel Sizer, the Executive Director of Preventing Pandemics at the Source. His question, “Why wasn’t more done to prevent this?” resonates strongly in these challenging times. We also need to reflect on and learn from past experiences. More importantly, they should serve as a guide for preparing initial responses and creating contingency plans for potential disruptions in the future. 

Being aware of the situation is crucial, but taking informed actions is equally important. This perspective is not just about acquiring knowledge but about acting promptly and appropriately based on that knowledge. It’s skills like these that enable us to face challenges, adapt, and emerge stronger. 

However, one noteworthy aspect is maintaining calmness throughout. It’s easy to let anxiety cloud our judgment as the scene unfolds, but letting panic take over could be detrimental, inciting irrational behaviors and decisions. Hence, amid the flux and uncertainty, maintaining a peaceful demeanor is vital.

Overall, the essence of an informed, proactive response coupled with calmness and composure gives us the resilience to work for a better outcome, regardless of the challenge we may face.

The Bottom Line

As we navigate these uncertain times, it’s crucial to remember that a positive test does not instantaneously signal an immediate danger to consumers. The committed response from our government, the sound investigation maneuvers by experts from the University of California, Davis, and the planned financial boost to support animal health research should instill confidence and peace of mind. Additionally, staying informed and proactively participating in measures to ensure your safety is of paramount importance. Keep in mind, we’re in this together, and through strategic actions and collective responsibility, we’ll continue to ensure the strength of our dairy industry and the health of our nation.

Summary: The H5N1 bird flu outbreak has affected 36 US dairy farms, raising concerns among Democrats and Republicans about potential risks for dairy cows and humans. Pasteurized milk remains safe, and agriculture officials have enforced testing protocols for cattle moved across states. However, Republican lawmakers are concerned about the potential impact of undue panic on the dairy industry, particularly in light of the 2009 swine flu outbreak. Scientists and federal officials are clear that viral fragments in pasteurized milk do not appear harmful, but their concern lies with raw milk, a popular product in states like Thompson’s. Sen. Ron Johnson, a prominent Republican voice, has seen H5N1 cases in birds but none so far in cows. Both parties are urging the Biden administration for rapid, transparent communication about the potential danger it could pose to dairy cattle and humans. The dairy industry is facing a complex situation with the H5N1 bird flu outbreak, leading to increased funding for research, infrastructure, and personnel. Sen. Thompson is spearheading an initiative to double the funding, proposing a generous $2 billion in funding. A wave of apprehension is quickly washing over the scene, as state health officials and farm workers voice concerns about keeping up with the new federal testing requirements for dairy cows.

Explore the ongoing Canada dairy trade dispute. Is Canada failing to comply with trade rules? Trade Minister Todd McClay weighs in.

In September last year, a significant turn of events on the global dairy trade stage took place. New Zealand came out as the victor in a trade dispute, arguing that Canada was obstructing dairy exporters’ access to its market, thereby breaching an agreed-upon treaty. The proceedings were initiated by New Zealand due to Canada’s non-compliance with the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP) rules. 

“A CPTPP arbitration panel ruled in New Zealand’s favour”, shares our source.

Canada had until Wednesday to alter its administration of tariff rate quotas to eradicate prioritizing its domestic industry, and to open doors for exporters to capitalize fully on the market access that had been negotiated in good faith between Canada and New Zealand. However, Trade Minister Todd McClay highlights that the tariff alterations Canada disclosed on Thursday still contravene the ruling. 

In a spirited declaration, McClay pointedly expressed Canada’s refusal to yield fully to a CPTPP trade dispute ruling over dairy trade as cynical. He highlighted that New Zealand had no aspiration to back down. 

“Canada’s ongoing failure to meet its legal commitments is disappointing, but we have no intention of giving in on this. We back our exporters and we will defend hard-won free trade agreement commitments. New Zealand supports trade rules and takes seriously its obligations to trade partners. We expect others to show us the same courtesy.”

Minister McClay has requested urgent legal advice on the next best steps to take. He emphasized that the Canadian government still had an opportunity to fulfill its obligations to New Zealand, both in the spirit and substance of the agreement. 

Subsequently, ACT Party trade spokesperson Dr Parmjeet Parmar had strong words regarding Canada’s stance. She labelled it a “betrayal of our friendship”. 

“It’s hard to think of two countries with warmer relations than New Zealand and Canada. Our shared history and cultural similarities ought to be the basis of a close, good-faith relationship. But on trade, Canada is shutting us out. Canada signed the CPTPP, knowing their exporters would benefit from reduced barriers to trade. But free trade is meant to go both ways,”

Dr Parmar advocated that if Canada could not comply, it should face the consequences and be “booted out of the deal”.

Unpacking the Canada Dairy Trade Dispute

When you dive into the history of dairy trade disputes between trading nations, you’ll find that these conflicts are a recurring theme. The crux of the issue for Canada lies in its free trade agreements with countries like the United Statesand New Zealand. The sticking point? Dairy trade. This seemingly unassuming topic has proven to be a bone of contention for decades. 

One current and contentious dispute is the USMCA dairy TRQ (Tariff Rate Quota) problem. Just last year, in 2021, Canada found itself in hot water as the United States challenged its dairy TRQ allocation measures. Such disagreements aren’t unique to the US either, as New Zealand took a similar stance, initiating dispute settlement proceedings against Canada under the CPTPP (Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership) pertaining to the same issue of dairy TRQs allocation. 

It’s important to note that despite these disputes, Canada’s dairy industry and its supply management system still enjoy firm backing. Figures like Trade Minister Mary Ng and Agriculture Minister Lawrence MacAuley continue to champion it. Even in the face of the rejected US claim against Canada’s dairy market restrictions by the USMCA dispute panel, efforts to support the industry and adhere to international trade agreements continue. 

For instance, following the Panel Report, Global Affairs Canada took steps to amend its dairy TRQ allocation measures. However, this move sparked another request for consultations from the United States. Clearly, despite amendments, tensions remain high. 

The gravity of these disputes should not be underestimated. Should these challenges prove successful, they may increase competition between Canadian and US dairy processors. US processors have struggled to obtain TRQ allocations to export processed dairy products at preferential duty rates to Canadian purchasers, injecting an additional layer of complexity into the situation. Meanwhile, New Zealand also poses a significant threat. Its challenge to Canada’s dairy supply management system adds pressure, creating a multifaceted dilemma that Canada must now navigate. 

Behind the Non-Compliance Allegations: An Investigation

Diving deeper into the allegations, there appears to be a complex web of non-compliance accusations directed towards Canada. Their alleged failure to adhere to trade rules has not only come under scrutiny from Trade Minister Todd McClay, but has landed them into a dispute settlement proceeding instigated by New Zealand under the CPTPP (Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership). The bone of contention here revolves around Canada’s administration of dairy Tariff Rate Quotas (TRQs).

New Zealand, a significant player in global diary industry, maintains that Canada’s measures for administering TRQs are seemingly inconsistent with the policies outlined in the CPTPP. The main issue lies in the fact that Canada has been accused of administering these quotas in a manner that restricts the exporting opportunities for overseas dairy producers, a move contradicting the basic tenets of free trade principles.

Moreover, the Compliance Panel’s verdict in this dispute has also added fuel to the ongoing fire. According to their findings, Canada has been providing export subsidies that exceed the quantity commitment levels, particularly for cheese exports. This raised eyebrows within the international community as it appeared to undermine the essence of the Agreement on Agriculture’s under Article 9.1(c). Despite Canada’s appeal to these findings, the Appellate Body reversed the compliance panel’s rulings on subsidies financed by governmental action.

But the brouhaha doesn’t end there. Just beyond Canadian borders, the United States has experienced its own scuffle with Canada over similar concerns. Mexico, another USMCA (United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement) member, is grappling with similar allegations. They’re under scrutiny for reportedly blocking private companies from operating renewable energy facilities and other energy-related activities by delaying or denying necessary permit applications.

In essence, the persisting trade disputes surrounding Canada are emblematic of a larger issue at hand – the harmony and fairness in global trade operations. Upholding international trade agreements is fundamental to ensuring a healthy and stable global economy, so it’s essential that each country honors their commitment, lest they face similar charges.

Breaking Down the Disputed Dairy Trade Regulations

Imagine trying to navigate the complex world of international trade, particularly when it comes to dairy commodities. Over the years, disagreements over the dairy trade have put the United States and Canada in a long-standing tussle. To simply put, these two nations just can’t seem to agree on the rules of the game. The current conflict hangs around the way Canada administers its dairy Tariff Rate Quotas (TRQs) – a point of contention that has sparked another, albeit smaller, trade war.  

So, why are these TRQs causing such a tigmotaxis? They are essentially a two-tiered tariff system that applies to countries with a quota – a certain quantity of a product which can be imported at lower tariffs. The issue lies in how these TRQs are allocated by Canada, which, according to the US and New Zealand, is in direct violation of the terms laid out in the U.S-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) and the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP), respectively. 

The US dairy industry was startled when the USMCA dispute panel rejected their charges against Canada’s dairy market restrictions in 2021. The ruling, as per Krysta Harden of the U.S Dairy Export Council, set an alarming precedent that could potentially damage the industry. On the flip side, the Global Affairs Canada amended its dairy TRQ allocation measures following the Panel Report, leading to yet another request for trade negotiations from the U.S. 

Why does this matter? Well, because if the U.S wins these challenges, it may usher in an era of increased competition between Canadian and U.S dairy processors. Likewise, it could mean that U.S processors, who were failing to obtain TRQ allocations, would gain the ability to export processed dairy products at preferential duty rates to Canadian purchasers. Needless to say, the stakes are high. 

It’s crucial to remember that behind these trade skirmishes is a deep-rooted defense of national interests. For instance, Canada’s dairy industry, and its supply management system is bolstered by the support of Trade Minister Mary Ng and Agriculture Minister Lawrence MacAuley. Amidst these challenges, actions such as these reveal the complexities and nuances involved when it comes to negotiating dairy trade amid competing economic interests.

The Bottom Line

At the heart of the matter, it’s clear to see that the implications of this protracted Canada-U.S. dairy trade dispute stretch far beyond just the realm of dairy. With billions of dollars at stake, and the livelihoods of producers hanging in the balance, the contested regulations have wide-ranging impacts on economic stability and international relations. The consensus from experts predicts that a successful outcome for Canada could notably enhance competition between the nations’ dairy processors. Although the prospects are daunting, it’s heartening to see that any victories won by Canada on this front will likely deliver a significant boost to their auto manufacturing sector. Let’s continue to follow this critical trade dispute, as it remains a key indicator of the health and future direction of North American trade relations.

Summary: In September last year, New Zealand emerged as the winner in a trade dispute with Canada, arguing that Canada was obstructing dairy exporters’ access to its market, breaching an agreed-upon treaty. The proceedings were initiated by New Zealand due to Canada’s non-compliance with the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP) rules. A CPTPP arbitration panel ruled in New Zealand’s favor, and Canada had until Wednesday to alter its administration of tariff rate quotas to eliminate prioritizing its domestic industry and open doors for exporters to capitalize on the market access negotiated in good faith between Canada and New Zealand. However, Trade Minister Todd McClay highlighted that the tariff alterations Canada disclosed still contravene the ruling. McClay expressed Canada’s refusal to yield fully to a CPTPP trade dispute ruling over dairy trade as cynical and that New Zealand had no aspiration to back down. He requested urgent legal advice on the next best steps and emphasized that the Canadian government still had an opportunity to fulfill its obligations to New Zealand. ACT Party trade spokesperson Dr. Parmjeet Parmar labelled Canada’s stance a “betrayal of their friendship” and advocated that if Canada could not comply, it should face the consequences and be “booted out of the deal.”

Discover why replacement cow prices have hit a 10-year peak, matching the $2,120 per head record of 2014. Dive into the factors driving this surge.

As you prepare for the continuously changing dynamics of the dairy market, it is worthwhile to note that tightening cow and heifers’ numbers have pushed average prices for U.S. replacement dairy cows to a 10-year high this past April. This is consistent with the latest USDA quarterly estimates. Additionally, in a welcome turn of events, the 2023 annual average cull cow prices soared to their highest point since 2015. 

U.S. replacement dairy cow prices averaged at $2,120 per head in April 2024. This marks a significant increase from the numbers in January 2024, where prices were up by $230 (12%) and an even steeper rise from April 2023, showing an increase of $400 (23%). This brings the quarterly average prices in April to match the same peak of $2,120 per head last seen in October 2014. 

The USDA’s price estimates are based on quarterly surveys (conducting in January, April, July, and October) coursed through dairy farmers in 24 major dairy states. Additionally, an annual survey conducted every February also contributes to these numbers. All states are taken into account during these surveys. They reliably represent the prices paid or received for cows that have delivered at least one calf and are sold for replacement purposes—excluding cull cows. Do remember, these reports do not summarize auction market prices.

These quarterly average prices for replacement cows rose in 23 out of the 24 major dairy states. The largest increases were observed in Vermont, New York, Georgia, and Ohio, all witnessing an increase of $350 or more. The only state where average prices dipped by $100 was New Mexico. 

Fast forward to a year later; April replacement cow prices were up $680 in Georgia and $560 in New York, and a somewhat similar increase ranging from $520-$540 per head was observed in Minnesota, Vermont, and Wisconsin. New Mexico remained the only unchanged entity from April 2023. 

With a one-month lag in reporting data, the USDA’s ag prices report indicates that the U.S. average prices received for cull cows (beef and dairy, combined) in March 2024 averaged at $119 per hundredweight (cwt). This is up $10 from February and more than $23 per cwt higher than March 2023. 

Dwindling cow numbers have had a notable impact not just on replacement prices but also dairy cow culling rates. The number of dairy cull cows marketed weekly through U.S. slaughter plants has trailed comparable weeks a year earlier since as far back as early August 2023, based on the latest USDA data. 

In March 2024, the number of dairy cull cows marketed through U.S. slaughter plants was estimated at 244,600. Although this reflects a decrease of 8,100 from February, it is the highest monthly total since August. However, it was also 61,600 fewer than March 2023 and marked the lowest March total since 2009.

Summary: The average prices for U.S. replacement dairy cows have reached a 10-year high in April 2024, according to the latest USDA quarterly estimates. The 2023 annual average cull cow prices have also reached their highest point since 2015. The quarterly average prices rose in 23 out of 24 major dairy states, with the largest increases in Vermont, New York, Georgia, and Ohio. The largest increases were observed in Georgia and New York, while the average prices for cull cows in March 2024 were $119 per hundredweight, up $10 from February and more than $23 per cwt higher than March 2023. Dwindling cow numbers have also affected replacement prices and dairy cow culling rates, with the number of dairy cull cows marketed through U.S. slaughter plants trailing comparable weeks a year earlier since early August 2023.

Discover how Biodel AG and Carbon Asset Solutions are revolutionizing carbon credit measurement and regenerative programming. Will they transform the carbon market?

Have you heard that Biodel, a notable US-based carbon project developer with a focus on regenerative agriculture is set to enter into a strategic partnership that could potentially alter the carbon credits landscape? They have teamed up with Carbon Asset Solutions, a well-established carbon registry and MRV provider. Their primary goal? To provide a streamlined carbon credit measurement and regenerative carbon programming, all rolled into one impressive service offering. 

Imagine having an accurate method of measuring carbon credits that’s simultaneously driving regenerative programming. Now that’s an exciting prospect! 

“This partnership is about leveraging each other’s strengths. It’s a synergistic relationship where we aim to simplify the complexities of carbon accumulation, empowering farmers to generate more income per acre. Furthermore, we are committed to deploying these services across a mammoth 50,000 acres of carbon projects in the western US by 2024.” – Biodel spokesperson

 What makes this partnership particularly intriguing is Biodel’s Regenerative Carbon Program. It’s based on the Carbon Asset Solutions’ carbon credit measurement solution. This program is touted to simplify the process of carbon accumulation, while also promising to generate greater income per acre. In essence, it’s a win-win scenario for everyone involved. The environment sees a reduction in carbon, and farmers see a boost in income.

Staying tuned into developments like this gives us all a front-row seat to witness the innovations and advancements that impact our environment and our pockets.

Summary: Biodel, a US-based carbon project developer focusing on regenerative agriculture, is partnering with Carbon Asset Solutions to provide a streamlined carbon credit measurement and regenerative carbon programming service. The partnership aims to simplify the complexities of carbon accumulation and empower farmers to generate more income per acre. Biodel’s Regenerative Carbon Program, based on Carbon Asset Solutions’ carbon credit measurement solution, is a win-win scenario for everyone involved. The environment sees a reduction in carbon, while farmers see a boost in income. The partnership aims to deploy these services across 50,000 acres of carbon projects in the western US by 2024. This partnership is a win-win scenario for the environment and farmers, as it allows for a better understanding of the innovations impacting the environment and our pockets.

Discover how BioLumic and AgriZero’s $3M partnership aims to revolutionize agriculture with low-methane ryegrass seed. Will this be the future of farming?

Picture this – a joint venture between forward-thinking AgTech startup, BioLumic, and AgriZero, a firm based out of New Zealand dedicated to creating low-emission grazing methods for cattle and sheep. Now imagine that they’ve just announced a significant $3 million investment directed towards the development of a revolutionary low-methane ryegrass seed. Sounds exciting, right? 

BioLumic takes a unique approach by programming plant genetic expression using UVB light. Their patented Light Treatment Platform interestingly merges molecular biological markers, plant science, and the innovative use of artificial intelligence. The result? They’re able to concoct and deploy short-duration BioLumic Light Signal Recipes not just to seeds but also to young plants. This initiative is rapidly advancing crop production, a step indispensable for addressing the pressing global agricultural concerns. 

Significantly, BioLumic’s expansive research doesn’t stop at ryegrass. They’re also making strides in the realm of corn, soybeans, and rice seed. Their aim? To continuously challenge the status quo and pave the way for more innovative and sustainable agricultural practices.

The collaboration between BioLumic and AgriZero is showing promising signs. A key outcome they’ve managed to achieve is an increase in the lipid content of ryegrass. Their motive is to target a noteworthy 12% reduction in methane emissions produced by pasture-based production systems. How does that translate to benefits? Well, higher dietary fat has been shown to enhance the metabolic performance of cattle and sheep. This partnership should have your undivided attention if you’re interested in sustainable agriculture, livestock performance, or ecological solutions.

Summary: BioLumic, a New Zealand-based AgTech startup, has announced a $3 million investment in developing a low-methane ryegrass seed. The company uses UVB light to program plant genetic expression, enabling them to deploy short-duration BioLumic Light Signal Recipes to seeds and young plants. This initiative is advancing crop production and addressing global agricultural concerns. BioLumic’s research extends to corn, soybeans, and rice seed, aiming to challenge the status quo and promote sustainable agricultural practices. The collaboration has led to an increase in ryegrass lipid content, with a goal of reducing methane emissions by 12%. This has been shown to enhance the metabolic performance of cattle and sheep. The partnership is a significant step towards sustainable agriculture, livestock performance, and ecological solutions. The partnership is expected to be of interest to those interested in sustainable agriculture, livestock performance, and ecological solutions.

Discover the latest update on FSA loan interest rates for May 2024. Find out how the slight increase could impact your farm’s finances. Ready to learn more?

Start your engines, folks! As we merge onto the highway of May 2024, it’s time to buckle up for a slight increase in loan interest rates. Heads up, we are seeing a slight uptick in the interest rates on loans offered via the USDA’s Farm Service Agency (FSA). Brace yourselves and get ready to navigate the financial terrain ahead.

The New Rates 

As we step into the month of May, you’ll be interested to know that the Farm Service Agency (FSA) has adjusted their interest rates. Both operating and ownership loans have seen a slight increase. Here’s a simple breakdown of what’s changed and what hasn’t: 

• Farm Operating Loans (direct): There’s been a small increase here; the interest rate is now set at 5.25%, moving upward from the previous 5.125%.
• Farm Ownership Loans (direct): Here too, we are observing a slight rise. The rate, previously at 5.375%, now stands at 5.5%.
• Farm Ownership Loans (direct, joint financing): This one’s jumped a notch too, moving from 3.375% to 3.5%.
• Farm Ownership Loans (down payment): No need for alarm, this remains steady at 1.5%. It’s good to see some things stay constant, isn’t it?
• Emergency Loan (amount of actual loss): Breathe easy. This one too remains unchanged at 3.75%.

Remember, the FSA also provides guaranteed loans through commercial lenders, with rates typically set by those lenders. For more specifics, don’t hesitate to reach out to your local USDA Service Center.

It’s important to note that, in addition to the direct loans offered by the FSA, they also facilitate guaranteed loans via commercial lenders. These loans carry interest rates as determined by the said lenders. This provides you, as an agricultural producer, with greater flexibility in choosing the loan that best suits your unique situation. 

If you require further information, feel free to connect with your nearest USDA Service Center. The experts there can provide you with a comprehensive understanding of all available loan options, and guide you in making informed decisions for the future of your farming operation.

Summary: In May 2024, the USDA’s Farm Service Agency (FSA) has adjusted its interest rates for both operating and ownership loans. The direct interest rate for Farm Operating Loans has increased to 5.25%, from 5.125%. The rate for Farm Ownership Loans has also increased to 5.5%, from 3.375% to 3.5%. The rate for Farm Ownership Loans (direct, joint financing) has also risen from 3.375% to 3.5%. The down payment rate for Farm Ownership Loans remains steady at 1.5%. The emergency loan for actual loss amount remains at 3.75%. The FSA also offers guaranteed loans through commercial lenders, with rates typically set by these lenders. For more information, contact your local USDA Service Center. These loans carry interest rates determined by the lenders, providing greater flexibility for agricultural producers in choosing the loan that best suits their unique situation.  For further information, contact your nearest USDA Service Center, where experts can provide a comprehensive understanding of all available loan options and guide you in making informed decisions for your farming operation.

Discover how Ontario Agricultural College has shaped agricultural education and innovation over 150 years. Join us in celebrating this remarkable milestone.

Starting from May 1 until the end of the year, the Ontario Agricultural College will be lauding its 150-year history, marked by a variety of events, projects, and activities that reflect its numerous achievements and vision for the future. Engaging history tours through the university campus, prosperous Food Day Canada celebrations, and a memorable capstone celebration during the Alumni Reunion Weekend in June are among the array of events taking place. The Ontario Agricultural College community, which includes alumni, faculty, staff, students, and industry partners, are encouraged to reconnect, share memories, and embrace the next 12 months of grand celebrations. 

“the entire University of Guelph community is thrilled to celebrate this significant milestone in our history,” Dr. Charlotte Yates, U of G President and Vice-Chancellor expressed in the release. “OAC has a proud and rich legacy of developing leaders and cultivating innovation in the global agri-food sector.”

The OAC’s inception saw 28 diploma students holding classes on a 550-acre farm owned by the province. Fast forward to today, the OAC has grown exponentially to over 3,300 students across two campuses in Guelph and Ridgetown, leveraging an extensive network of research centers owned by the Agricultural Research Institute of Ontario (ARIO) that spans the province. 

Initially known as the Ontario School of Agriculture and Experimental Farm, it changed its name in 1880 to better reflect its purpose and future ambitions. Throughout its history, the university has always positioned the OAC as a leader in innovation, research, and teaching, providing steadfast support for the agri-food sector. 

“Today, the influence of OAC extends far beyond agriculture. It bolsters the backbone of our global agri-food system,” said John Cranfield, acting Dean of OAC in the May 1 release kick-starting the anniversary celebrations. “OAC is a beacon of support for those dedicated to nurturing the land, sustaining our communities, and safeguarding the environment for the forthcoming generations. With strategic partnerships across various sectors, including government and organizations championing agriculture, food, the environment, and rural communities, OAC is equipped to continue its crucial mission.”

When the college welcomed its first cohort of students, the Ontario government foresaw the college securing a prominent place on the world stage. In 1874, it was one of the first institutions in Canada to amalgamate scientific research into farming practices, which significantly modernized agriculture across the country. This noble commitment continues today through the Ontario Agri-food Innovation Alliance, a collaboration between the Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs (OMAFRA), and the university. 

Over the course of 150 years, the university highlights that the OAC has seen the world change in fundamental ways, and stories throughout its history reveal how it transformed into the innovation education powerhouse it is today. 

• In 1903, the establishment of the Macdonald Institute on the OAC campus marked a significant progression for women into the community and higher education.
• During both World Wars, OAC professors taught military leaders how to efficiently use war rations to feed the soldiers.
• In 1946, OAC opened its doors to its first international students from India who joined to learn the latest innovations in animal husbandry, beekeeping, and soil biology.
• In 1964, OAC became a founding college of U of G, marking a new phase of growth that would eventually help it meet international standards.
• In 1997, OAC expanded its reach by conducting research and offering programs at two locations, as Ridgetown campus officially became part of the institution.

Summary: The Ontario Agricultural College (OAC) is celebrating its 150-year history from May 1 to the end of the year, with events and activities reflecting its achievements and vision for the future. With over 3,300 students across two campuses, OAC has grown exponentially, leveraging an extensive network of research centers owned by the Agricultural Research Institute of Ontario (ARIO). Initially known as the Ontario School of Agriculture and Experimental Farm, it changed its name in 1880 to better reflect its purpose and future ambitions. OAC has always positioned itself as a leader in innovation, research, and teaching, providing steadfast support for the agri-food sector. Its influence extends beyond agriculture, bolstering the backbone of the global agri-food system. The Ontario government foresaw the college’s prominence on the world stage when it welcomed its first cohort of students in 1874. Today, the Ontario Agri-food Innovation Alliance, a collaboration between the Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs (OMAFRA) and the university, continues OAC’s commitment to innovation education.

Discover how GameSquare and Dairy MAX are revolutionizing Fortnite’s Farm Tycoon with their exciting new UEFN world-building map campaign. Will you join the fun?

Esports conglomerate, GameSquare, has teamed up once again with Dairy MAX, a dairy advocacy group, to launch a UEFN world-building map campaign in Fortnite’s popular Farm Tycoon. A brainchild of this ongoing partnership, the campaign capitalizes on the reach of beloved Fortnite creators like Maria ‘Chica’ Lopez, Sanchowest and Preston ‘Tbnrfrags’ Arsement to spread the word. 

Farm Tycoon, developed by Moonlight Studios—a GameSquare subsidiary, lets players don the hat of a dairy farmer, striding forth to create and manage their own digital farms. These virtual farm owners can carry out a slew of operations that mimic real-world farming. From claiming plots of land to sprucing up the farm infrastructure, players gain in-game currency, enriching their farming journey. 

“GameSquare’s commitment to delivering creative experiences to gamers is unparalleled, and their community of influencers boasts a cross-generational, global impact. We want youth to perform at their best. A balanced diet will unlock new levels to their full potential.” – Jennie McDowell, Dairy MAX Chief Strategy Officer.

A quick look back reveals the journey of this alliance. Dairy Max and GameSquare first came together in March 2021, with the former teaming up with Complexity Gaming, a GameSquare subsidiary. Then, in July 2023, they launched a gaming campaign titled ‘Level Unlocked.’ Always active in the esports sphere, Dairy MAX collaborated with Optic Gaming back in 2022 to serve as its official nutrition partner. Established 40 years ago, Dairy MAX is a non-profit organization backing more than 900 dairy farmers across eight different US states.

As this partnership propels to its new chapter, the world eagerly awaits the unveiling of Farm Tycoon’s newest map campaign.

Summary: GameSquare has partnered with Dairy MAX, a dairy advocacy group, to launch a UEFN world-building map campaign in Fortnite’s popular game, Farm Tycoon. The campaign, developed by Moonlight Studios, allows players to become dairy farmers and manage their own digital farms. Players can carry out operations that mimic real-world farming, earning in-game currency to enrich their farming journey. The alliance began in March 2021 with Dairy Max and GameSquare, with the former teaming up with Complexity Gaming. In July 2023, they launched a gaming campaign titled ‘Level Unlocked.’ Dairy MAX, established 40 years ago, is a non-profit organization backing over 900 dairy farmers across eight US states. The world eagerly awaits the unveiling of Farm Tycoon’s newest map campaign. The partnership aims to promote a balanced diet and unlock new levels for youth to perform at their best.

Explore the uncertain future of Hartford’s last dairy farm as the herd departs. Will the city lose its agricultural heritage? Dive into this compelling story.

Imagine yourself in the verdant pastures of Vermont, gazing at the rolling hills of Jericho Rural Historic District. Now, picture a populous herd of dairy cows grazing peacefully. This picturesque scene is gradually fading, with yet another contributing element, the Jericho Hill Farm, preparing to cease dairy operations. Initiated in 1907, the farm is not just selling off its healthy dairy cattle but also symbolizes the reduction of a rich agrarian history. A story with deep roots, the tale of Hartford, Vermont, is marked by a crucial turn as the Miller family, spearheaded by George Miller, has recently sold their last remaining bastion of traditional dairy farming – Jericho Hill Farm. As a century-old legacy established by George’s great-grandfather in 1907, the farm has been a well-known producer of about 150 gallons of milk every day. The farm’s buyout has resulted in Windsor County now housing a mere 17 dairy operations, a dramatic fall from the 84 that enlivened the region in 1997.

Recently, George Miller, his son, cousin, and brother embarked on a reluctant journey. They shepherded 27 stubborn Jersey cows and six heifers out of the barn and onto the livestock trailers destined for their new owner in Canton, New York. This marked a significant transition for not only the Miller family but also the city of Hartford, which bid farewell to its last remaining working dairy farm. 

Until recently, Jericho Hill Farm had been producing about 150 gallons of milk per day in addition to hay and maple syrup. The family had been working this land, originally purchased by George’s great-grandfather in 1907 when he arrived from Canada aboard a train with money his wife had artfully hidden in his jacket pocket. 

At his peak George took care of a herd of 60 Holsteins along with the Jerseys. However, he decided to sell the Holsteins in 2015 amidst the bleak outlook on milk prices and the struggle to manage both herds, therefore scaling back to maximize efficiency and sustainability. 

His wife Linda, despite retiring in 2018 after 40 years at Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, lends a crucial hand in the running of the farm. She states in a recent interview, “I don’t know that a young couple could make it without off-farm income.” She fondly recalls an annual agricultural conference on artificial insemination that she looked forward to, mainly because it presented the only three days all year when George got a break from farm work. 

“We’re going to party”, the Millers’ son, Alex, says. “Not every farmer gets to walk away a winner in this industry, like we have managed to.” Looking at the future of Jericho Hill Farm, he adds, “My kids could come up in 20 years and want to be dairy farmers.” 

Following their 45th wedding anniversary, Linda is keen on planning a big trip. To which she optimistically queries, “I said, where in this world are we going, George Miller?”

You gaze upon the once thriving Hartford dairy farm, the last of its kind within the area, and you’ll find it’s an image of change. A sweeping emerald landscape emptied of its usual, bustling inhabitants, the dairy cows. Namely, Dolly – the last cow, marking an end to a chapter in Hartford’s history. 

This shift isn’t just peculiar to Hartford, it mirrors a broader trend across Vermont, the Green Mountain State. The decline in the dairy industry has become a noticeable trait for places that once held these farms dear. A vivid example is the Jericho Rural Historic District, where the decline in dairy farms over the years is palpable. 

So robust was the dairy industry that in 2002, Vermont was the proud host to 1,508 dairy farms. By last year, that count had tumbled drastically to less than 500, revealing a sharp decline in this way of life, affecting both the cultural and economic fabric of the Vermont’s agrarian structure.

While you may be familiar with the sight of the Millers’ dairy herd moving serenely across the landscape, completing their daily rituals, the herd is no more. The last cow, endearingly called Dolly, marched off into retirement and with her departure, marked the end of an era for Hartford’s last standing dairy farm. 

It’s not the luscious pastures that will solely miss the bovine residents. The Modern Milkman Creamery, responsible for delivering fresh milk to the local community’s doorsteps, also kisses goodbye to its supply of fresh dairy milk. Contracting supply chains doesn’t just affect economic aspects, but also threatens lifestyle habits locals have indulged in for so many years. 

Change, though inevitable, often becomes more challenging when it affects longstanding traditions and habits. For instance, take Spring Brook’s significant curtailment of its cheese production due to personnel woes. Vermont’s culinary experience is under threat as some local products dwindle.

Within this picture, you see the Millers who waved goodbye to their hardworking dairy herd. They’re another face of change in an industry that has served as a foundation for food production and rural livelihoods. The reason? Working a dairy farm is a hard way to live. The Millers are a testament to this, having delivered fresh dairy products to area customers through Modern Milkman Creamery, every morning, without fail. 

It brings a stark reality into focus: the numbers. The number of dairy farms in Vermont has seen a drastic decline, from 1,508 in 2002 to fewer than 500 in the past year alone. These numbers reverberate in small towns and historic districts alike, reflected in situations such as the sale of Jericho Hill Farm, founded in 1907. The dairy cows, including the beloved Holsteins, are being shipped away, leaving the once bustling farm eerily quiet. 

In the face of such a change, it’s imperative to consider and appreciate the resilience of Connecticut’s Oakridge Dairy, the state’s largest dairy farm. It renders vitality to the dairy business by ensuring that about 20 percent of the marketed milk is sourced from its operations. While they thrive amidst the mountainous challenges of a dwindling industry, Oakridge Dairy represents hope for dairy farming’s future. 

Lastly, organizations like the Connecticut Department of Agriculture carry the important mandate of breeding a healthy environment for farming, while also sensitizing more people about the importance and richness of Connecticut’s agriculture. However, with the dwindling dairy farms in Hartford, they find themselves faced with an increasingly difficult task – how to uphold legacy in the face of change.

Considered in this light, this change impacts not only the economic fabric but also the landscape. The emptiness left behind marks an end, but also a stark reminder to adapt or get left behind. It’s an echo from even the smaller industry players such as Spring Brook, who are reducing cheese production due to staffing challenges.

The fall of Hartford’s last dairy farm is an important moment for you to reflect and recognize that being in the dairy farming industry demands resilience, tenacity, and the will to weather ever-present challenges – truly, a very hard way to make a living.

Summary: The Miller family, including George Miller, has sold their last remaining dairy farm, Jericho Hill Farm, in Hartford Vermont. The farm, which had been in the Miller family for over a century, produced about 150 gallons of milk per day and was owned by George’s great-grandfather in 1907. The sale of the herd has left Windsor County with only 17 dairy operations, a significant drop from the 84 farms it housed in 1997. The Miller family’s wife Linda, who retired in 2018, has been crucial in running the farm, providing off-farm income. The fall of Hartford’s last dairy farm is an important moment for reflecting on the resilience, tenacity, and will to weather ever-present challenges in the dairy farming industry. The number of dairy farms in Vermont has seen a drastic decline, with Oakridge Dairy, Connecticut’s largest dairy farm, providing about 20% of the state’s milk.

Discover how the new EU-NZ trade deal could boost European exports by €4.5 billion annually. Will your business benefit from this economic growth?

As you open the newspaper today (Wednesday, May 1), you’ll find a headline you’ve been eagerly waiting for: The EU-New Zealand trade agreement is finally in force. According to the European Commission, this much-anticipated step could catalyze the growth of EU exports to New Zealand by a staggering €4.5 billion annually. 

The benefits this agreement brings to EU companies, producers, and farmers are vast. The trade agreement is expected to reduce duties for them by a significant €140 million per year. The Commission is even forecasting that trade between the EU and New Zealand will grow by up to 30% within a decade as a direct result of this deal. As an investor, you could also see EU investment in New Zealand surge by 80%. 

This isn’t just any trade agreement, though. It includes unprecedented sustainability commitments. The respect of the Paris Climate Agreement and core labour rights are baked right into the agreement. Demonstrating that economic prosperity and sustainability can indeed go hand in hand.

From the onset, the agreement is all set to eliminate tariffs on key EU exports to New Zealand. Picture this: Your exports of pigmeat, wine and sparkling wine, chocolate, sugar confectionary, and biscuits – all delivered without the weight of extra tariffs. The golden benefit, however, is for “sensitive EU agricultural products” like beef, sheepmeat, and dairy products. They will be protected with carefully designed tariff rate quotas. 

• The deal allows 10,000t of beef from New Zealand to be imported with a reduced duty of 7.5%.
• A tariff rate quota permits 38,000t of duty-free sheepmeat imports.
• The agreement will see 15,000t of milk powders imported with a 20% duty rate, and 25,000t of cheese and 3,500t of whey imported duty-free.
• The duty on over 35,000t of butter imports will also be reduced.
• These volumes will be gradually phased in over the next seven years.

The Free Trade Agreement (FTA) also protects all EU Geographical Indications (GIs) for wines and spirits, along with the heritage of 163 of the most renowned traditional EU products such as Feta, Istarski Prsut Ham, and Elia Kalamatas olives. 

We’ve arrived at this landmark day after a journey that took over four years, with negotiations for the EU-New Zealand trade agreement having started back in June 2018. Last November, the European Parliament voted to adopt the deal. This was followed by a decision to conclude the agreement by the European Council. New Zealand completed its ratification procedure just over a month ago, on March 25, 2024. Today, we see the fruition of these efforts, paving way for a prosperous trade future between the EU and New Zealand.

Summary: The EU-New Zealand trade agreement is in effect, potentially increasing EU exports to New Zealand by €4.5 billion annually. The agreement will reduce duties for EU companies, producers, and farmers by €140 million per year, with a 30% growth in trade within a decade. EU investment in New Zealand could also surge by 80%. The agreement includes sustainability commitments, respecting the Paris Climate Agreement and core labor rights. It eliminates tariffs on key EU exports to New Zealand, but provides protection for “sensitive EU agricultural products” like beef, sheepmeat, and dairy products. The deal allows for reduced import volumes of beef, sheepmeat, milk powders, cheese, whey, and butter, gradually phased in over the next seven years. The Free Trade Agreement protects all EU Geographical Indications for wines and spirits and the heritage of 163 traditional EU products.

Discover how milk from sick cows in North Texas led to fatal illness in over half of 24 domestic cats. Learn more.

In a world where every life matters, the health of our pets is a priority. This holds true particularly for those feline companions who add an extra touch of warmth and coziness to our homes. But what happens when they fall gravely ill? It’s a distressing scene every pet enthusiast dreads – and one that most recently occurred on a dairy farmland in North Texas. 

We understand your concern when it comes to the safety of your household pets. As it stands, over half of about two dozen domestic cats fed with milk from ailing cows on a dairy farm in the northern part of Texas fell ill and tragically lost their lives in mid-March. This story isn’t just about those cats or that farm. It’s about a situation that could potentially affect you and your furry friends. Stay with us as we delve into this disturbing event and its alarming implications.

Let’s consider the hard facts: Milk derived from sick cows was given to approximately 24 domestic cats. This seemingly harmless act had dire consequences as over half of these cats subsequently fell ill and died. As pet owners, friends, and companions, these are the kind of incidents that remind us the importance of being vigilant about what we feed our pets.

The Mysterious Outbreak: Can Cats Get Sick from Drinking Milk from Sick Cows?

You may wonder, “Can cats really get sick from drinking milk from unhealthy cows?” The answer, unfortunately, seems to be yes. A notable incident that took place in March on a North Texas dairy farm lends weight to this assertion.

A study published in the Emerging Infectious Diseases journal sheds light on this surprising chain of infection. On this particular farm, about 24 domestic cats consumed milk from cows infected with the H5N1 bird flu. The result was nothing short of devastating. Over half of those cats got sick and unfortunately succumbed to the illness by mid-March.

The cats started to exhibit symptoms not unlike those displayed by the diseased cows. It is suspected that the virus spread initially from cow-to-cow after coming into contact with wild birds carrying the H5N1 virus. This incident has sparked discussions about the spread of the H5N1 virus within dairy herds across several states in the U.S. 

You might find it puzzling that cats would drink cow’s milk in the first instance. After all, most adult cats are lactose intolerant and kittens are advised not to consume cow’s milk post-weaning. However, barn cats are often provided cow’s milk as a readily available food source. This seemingly benign practice can have grave implications when the milk comes from infected cows. Besides intolerance and virus transmission, milk allergy is another potential peril lurking in the dietary habit. 

The tragic incidents at the Texas dairy farm have brought to the forefront the indirect consequences of bird flu outbreaks on domesticated animals and echoed the call for vigilant disease surveillance and biosecurity measures on farms.

Tracing the Origins: The Dairy Farm Link to Fatal Feline Illness

You may be pondering as to why your domestic cat is vulnerable to a disease, primarily existing in cows or wild birds, right? As it transpires, it all boils down to a simple yet unfortunate occurrence that took place on a North Texas dairy farm. 

According to a study published in the well-respected journal Emerging Infectious Diseases, the catastrophe began when the farm’s cats started consuming milk from a trough filled by these very cows, the ones already infected with the H5N1 bird flu. The unsuspecting felines, attracted to the allure of fresh milk, unknowingly ingested the virus, marking the start of the fatal health crisis on the farm. 

The US Department of Agriculture confirmed the presence of the H5N1 in the involved dairy herd, making it undeniable that the virus had accomplished a previously unheard-of jump between species, posing as a serious health concern. 

The tragic passing of numerous cats on this farm isn’t just an isolated event. Unfortunately, it seems to reflect a larger issue at play on the national level. As of April 30th, the virus has been implicated in other dairy herds across the country. From a total of over 26,000 dairy herds nationwide, 34 have reportedly been impacted by H5N1 

The source of initial infection at this Texas farm is thought to be contaminated feed consumed by the cows. Viral genetic material present in the feces of indefinitely infected wild birds, assumedly became mixed with the cow’s feed. A classic case of being in the wrong place at the wrong time. This simple act of eating led to a rapid virus transmission, first between cows, concluded by a lethal spillover to cats. 

A silver lining in the midst of this tragic outbreak is how authorities are taking proactive measures to curb the further spread of the deadly H5N1 virus in dairy cattle. The detection of genetic traces of H5N1 in commercial milk samples by the Food and Drug Administration barely strengthens the importance of this action. 

While direct cow to cat transmission of the H5N1 may come across as a surprising notion, these recent events reveal a painful reality. Infectious diseases can cross unseen boundaries, and our beloved pets aren’t always immune. The situation underlines the need for rigorous health and safety measures, not just for humans but for all species inhabiting our shared world.

Understanding the North Texas Cat Deaths: A Startling Connection

You’re probably wondering, how this chain of transmission unfolded. Here is where it gets interesting. The study published in the journal Emerging Infectious Diseases paints a detailed picture of how the deadly H5N1 virus spread from sick cows to domestic cats in the north Texas farm. 

At first, it seemed inexplicable. The farm cats were simply doing what comes naturally – drinking from a trough of milk. Unfortunately, this wasn’t just any milk. It was milk from cows infected with the H5N1 bird flu virus. A fact, the US Department of Agriculture confirmed after extensive testing. 

How did the cows get infected, you may ask? This grim tale begins with wild birds, known carriers of the H5N1 virus, shedding the pathogen in their feces. The cow feed, unintentionally contaminated with these feces, was ingested by the dairy cattle, marking the initiation of this fatal chain. 

Once introduced into the dairy herd, the virus spread rapidly from cow-to-cow, then took an unexpected leap across species when the cats began drinking the tainted milk. The transmission from cows to cats caused a swift and brutal outbreak among the feline population. Of the approximately two dozen cats living on the farm, more than half got sick and tragically died in mid-March. 

The symptoms were severe. Cats exhibited similar signs to those observed in the cows, pointing researchers towards the virus’s formidable ability to mutate and infect multiple hosts. Sounds alarming, doesn’t it? 

It’s also worth noting, there have been human casualties too. In Cambodia, individuals suspected of consuming infected birds fell ill, ringing alarm bells in the global health community. Authorities worldwide, including the US, are working diligently to prevent the further spread of this dangerous virus, especially in dairy cattle. 

The tragic events at the north Texas dairy farm underscore the complex and often unpredictable nature of viral transmission. It’s a stark reminder of just how intertwined our lives are with those of the animals we share this planet with, and it serves as a timely warning about the critical importance of robust disease surveillance and control measuresin livestock populations.

The Bottom Line

So, it’s crucial for you to understand that animal health, especially the health of domesticated animals, is intimately linked with the health and well-being of the human population. The incident on the North Texas dairy farm underscores the importance of regular health monitoring and diagnostic testing of animals used for food or feed. Environmental factors, diet, and a comprehensive veterinary team on-hand are all the building blocks of a robust animal health strategy. Whether it’s the milk we put in our cereals or the ground beef that’s yet to be tested, every element of food production demands our attention – for both our pets and us. There’s no room for complacency even though no immediate human risk has been detected. So, let’s continue to evolve and advance in our processes and understandings to ensure a healthier world for all creatures. Remember, in nature, we’re all connected.

Summary: A North Texas dairy farm has reported that over half of two dozen domestic cats fed milk from ailing cows fell ill and tragically lost their lives in mid-March. The incident highlights the importance of being vigilant about what we feed our pets and the potential risks of consuming milk from unhealthy cows. The virus is suspected to have spread initially from cow-to-cow after coming into contact with wild birds carrying the H5N1 virus. Cats are lactose intolerant and are advised not to consume cow’s milk post-weaning. However, barn cats are often provided cow’s milk as a readily available food source, which can have grave implications when the milk comes from infected cows. Milk allergy is another potential peril lurking in the dietary habit. The tragic incidents at the Texas dairy farm have brought to the forefront the indirect consequences of bird flu outbreaks on domesticated animals and echoed the call for vigilant disease surveillance and biosecurity measures on farms.

We bring alarming news from the heartland of our nation’s dairy production. A dairy herd in Colorado has recently tested positive for the Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza A (HPAI) H5N1 virus. This recent case brings the total number of confirmed cases to an unsettling figure—34 across nine states. Unfortunately, that’s not all. These stats are per the United States Department of Agriculture’s Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS). 

Today sees the effect of a new federal order in response to this threat. This important directive aims to contain the spread of this insidious virus by mandating testing before interstate movement of dairy cattle. It zeroes in specifically on the lactating dairy cattle. No matter the reason, whether for shows, sales, or transfers, the cattle moved across states line must undergo pre-movement testing for H5N1. 

The pre-movement testing stipulates that testing must be carried out within seven days of moving these cattle, with accompanying documentation to affirm the health state. Notably, a Certificate of Veterinary Inspection (CVI) is now compulsory for all lactating dairy cattle crossing state lines. The necessity for caution cannot be overstated.

It’s critical to realize that this isn’t a regional problem. Rather, it’s infiltrated several dairy herds across states, from Idaho to Ohio, as evidenced by clinical samples, such as milk and tissue, drawn from diseased cattle. The unfortunate herds under attack are suffering a steep decrease in lactation, reduced appetite, amongst other symptoms. Nature, unfortunately, hasn’t been kind and it’s the dairy cows that bear the brunt, with significant drops in productivity and overall health. 

Not surprisingly, the primary driver behind the outbreak seems to be animal movement within the dairy industry. This discovery underlines the need for stronger regulations and more strategic transportation methods. – Quoted from USDA

The situation isn’t just a concern for these poor animals. The CDC has reported at least one human HPAI A(H5N1) infection stemming from exposure to infected dairy cattle in Texas. While this might be a minute snapshot in an extensive picture, the possibility of HPAI A(H5N1) transmission through the consumption of raw, unpasteurized milk looms. 

Dairy farms that house the affected cows should follow strict guidelines to protect their workers from exposure. This means, not only scheduling regular health inspections for staff, but also ensuring the treatment or pasteurization of raw milk and related products from exposed cattle. 

Thankfully, there is power in collaboration. Not one, but four major agencies – the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), USDA, CDC, and state partners have come together to tackle this illness that has wreaked havoc among dairy herds in multiple states. Staying informed and proactive could make all the difference in protecting our dairy herds and our communities. After all, as Benjamin Franklin wisely said, “An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure.”

Learn how the HPAI Federal Order impacts dairy farming. Stay updated with essential guidelines to safeguard your livestock and maintain productivity.

Imagine dealing with an invisible enemy that poses significant risks not just to your flock, but also potentially your dairy farm. Yes, you’ve understood correctly, we’re talking about Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza (HPAI), a severe viral disease that affects birds. With the activation of a Federal Order concerning HPAI, it’s evident that the situation is grave and urgent. But, to face and overcome this challenge, knowledge is your primary armor. That’s why we have written this article – to equip dairy farmers like you with the crucial information, helping you understand the Federal Order, its implications for dairy farming, and how to navigate through the considerable challenges an HPAI outbreak may pose.

What is the HPAI Federal Order?

The HPAI Federal Order is a regulatory measure enacted to combat the spread of High Pathogenic Avian Influenza (HPAI), a serious viral disease predominantly affecting bird populations. Despite primarily impacting birds, HPAI has consequential effects on broader agricultural operations due to its potential to cause major disruptions in animal feed supply and necessitate the enforcement of strict biosecurity measures. 

These comprehensive measures can considerably alter shared agricultural practices, potentially leading to increased costs and additional labor requirements for farmers. The broad influence of HPAI, thus, draws attention and requires vigilance from all farmers, even those operating within the dairy industry. The goal of the Federal Order is to manage and control the spread of HPAI, thereby protecting farms and upholding the health and welfare of all animals within the agricultural sector.

Key Aspects of the Federal Order

 The federal order activation for HPAI involves several critical elements that dairy farmers need to be well prepared for. It’s not just about knowing these aspects but truly understanding and incorporating them into your daily agricultural practice.   

• One of the first pillars of this order is enhanced biosecurity measures. The mandate is clear – implementing stringent biosecurity protocols to prevent the spread of the virus is crucial. This not only includes restrictions on movement but also demands enhanced cleaning and disinfection practices at all agricultural facilities.
• Next up is surveillance and reporting. Your herd health monitoring needs to be top notch. Increased surveillance measures are required under the order that require farmers to keep a close eye on their livestock and poultry. Any signs of illness must be reported to authorities immediately. Early detection can be instrumental in controlling the spread of HPAI. 
• Lastly, in the unfortunate event of an outbreak, control and eradication efforts must kick into high gear. The federal order outlines precise procedures for containment, which could potentially involve the culling of affected and exposed animals. The goal of this action is to cease further spread of the virus promptly. 

Understanding these key aspects of the federal order will put you in a better position to protect your flock and effectively deal with reports of HPAI in your area.

How does the HPAI Federal Order affect dairy farmers?

You might be wondering, if dairy cows aren’t affected directly by HPAI, why is it crucial for dairy farmers to understand the implications of the Federal Order. Despite dairy cattle’s resistance to HPAI virus, dairy operations face as significant an impact because of several associated reasons. 

• Feed Supply Chain Disruptions
  Remember that affected poultry farms might disrupt the feed production and supply chains. As a dairy farmer, you may have to brace for the reality of increased feed costs and potential shortages. Ensuring effective operational planning with these considerations can help mitigate potential impacts.
• The Risk of Cross-Contamination
  Moreover, if your farm also houses poultry or is located near affected areas, the risk of cross-contamination is real. This calls for strict biosecurity measures to prevent the HPAI virus from invading your dairy operations. Always remember, the health of your livestock also depends on consistent and diligent monitoring of poultry on or in proximity to your farm.
• The Imperativeness of Regulatory Compliance
  In these challenging times, it is crucial to strictly adhere to federal regulations. Any non-compliance to the HPAI Federal Order could invite severe penalties and additional restrictions, hampering your farm operations. Knowing and following regulations is not optional, rather it’s a primary concern for every dairy farmer like you.

What are the requirements under the HPAI Federal Order for dairy farmers?

As a dairy farmer, handling the challenges posed by the HPAI Federal Order may feel daunting. So, we’ve put together some key strategies that might guide you in handling these complexities effectively. 

• Review and Enhance Biosecurity Protocols
  Begin with evaluating your farm’s current biosecurity measures. Make sure they align with the updated federal guidelines. More importantly, it’s essential to ensure that all your farm staff are well-trained and understand these revised protocols. Enhancing your biosecurity measures and ensuring compliance can help constitute a solid first line of defense.
• Plan for Feed Supply Issues
  Disruptions to feed supply can be a significant challenge, so it’s crucial to prepare ahead. Consider transforming these challenges into opportunities by exploring alternative feed sources. Also, you may want to increase your on-farm feed storagecapacity. Having such contingency plans in place would keep you one step ahead, ensuring a continued supply even in unforeseen scenarios.
• Stay Informed
  In these times, staying informed is more essential than ever. Keep your eyes on the updates from both federal and state agriculture departments. A smooth flow of information during outbreak scenarios is crucial, helping to ensure that all preventive and control measures are implemented accurately, promptly, and effectively.
• Collaborate with Local Farmers and Authorities
  Collaboration can indeed be a game-changing strategy during outbreak situations. Try to connect with your local farmers, forming community partnerships to share resources and information. Building such connections can help in establishing a more robust defense against the spread of the disease. Remember, unity is strength, and together, you can navigate these challenges efficiently.

The Bottom Line

 As the curtain falls on this subject, it’s clear to see that the HPAI federal order paves the way for a high-stakes situation that necessitates deliberate and quick-witted interventions not just from dairy farming communities but all farming sectors. Dairy farmers can bulletproof their operations and lend a helping hand towards the wider campaign to minimize and obliterate this severe disease by gaining insights into the ramifications of the order and establishing stringent biosecurity protocols. The path towards successfully mitigating the many obstacles tossed up by HPAI is paved with knowledge, readiness, and a forward-thinking approach. 

Summary: HPAI, a severe viral disease affecting birds, poses significant risks to dairy farms and their flocks. A Federal Order has been activated to address this issue, emphasizing the need for knowledge and preparedness in dairy farming. The order includes enhanced biosecurity measures, surveillance and reporting, control and eradication efforts, and regulatory compliance. Enhanced biosecurity measures include restrictions on movement, improved cleaning and disinfection practices, and herd health monitoring. Early detection is crucial for controlling HPAI spread. Control and eradication efforts may involve culling affected and exposed animals. Feed supply disruptions could occur due to disruptions in feed production and supply chains, increasing feed costs or contributing to shortages. Cross-contamination risks exist for farms that rear poultry or are located near affected areas. Regulatory compliance is crucial, as failure may lead to severe penalties and additional restrictions on farm operations.

Concerned about bird flu in your store-bought milk? Discover the truth about milk safety and put your worries to rest. Read on to learn more.

We’re certain you’ve heard whispers or caught headlines about bird flu, and if you’re like us, you’ve probably wondered, “Is this something I need to worry about when I’m buying my groceries?” Specifically, a frequently asked question is, “Is my milk safe from bird flu?”  

Note, when a pandemic starts making the news, it’s natural for us to become wary about the safety of common food items from the grocery store. It’s important to stay informed and educated. Remember, knowledge is power.

Well, breathe easy because we’re here to dissect this issue for you, providing you with all the necessary information for your peace of mind. So, continue reading to understand more about bird flu and whether it poses a risk to your daily glass of milk. Let’s dive in!

Have you heard the recent news about avian influenza or bird flu being detected in dairy milk in the United States? It sounds scary, but according to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), bird flu has a low likelihood of causing illness in humans. In fact, an advisory issued this week disclosed that the FDA, along with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), are investigating the presence of H5N1 avian influenza in dairy cows and their milk.

This disease, known as Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza (HPAI), is highly contagious and often deadly in poultry. However, despite its intimidating name, it is not readily transmissible to humans, even though there have been some recorded infections. The reassuring news is, despite the FDA detecting bird flu in raw milk, as well as traces of the H5N1 virus in milk sold at grocery stores, commercial dairy products are still considered safe to consume. The reason? Almost all of such products (99%), have undergone pasteurization. 

That said, it’s important to note that the virus could still be present in raw milk products. Because of this, the FDA has continuously warned consumers about the potential risks associated with consuming them. And they’re not alone in their assessment!

Renowned professor of Infectious Diseases, William Schaffner, MD, at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, concurs with the FDA’s assessment. His view is that transmission of the disease, especially from milk, is unlikely. “This is a virus that does not have the genetic capacity to be transmitted from person to person. And this virus has been around in the world, in bird populations for a decade, and it still has not acquired this capacity,” he told Healthline. 

To illustrate his unwavering confidence, he added, “I have in my hand a cup of coffee with milk in it. I put milk into my oatmeal. I had no concern about it.” So, in a world of uncertainty, one daily constant you can count on is the safety of your dairy milk.

How did bird flu get into the milk supply?

Did you know that the FDA has recently detected the HPAI virus in dairy cow herds in several areas across the US such as Idaho, Kansas, New Mexico, Texas, and more? Recent updates have also informed us that a federal order, requiring tests for and reporting of HPAI in livestock, has been put into effect. This makes it more crucial than ever to stay informed and alert. 

Although the HPAI virus is now found in dairy cows, to this date, only two cases of its transmission to humans have been reported. Casting our minds back to earlier this month, the CDC confirmed an individual in Texas carrying the disease. The individual, after coming into contact with dairy cattle, showed symptoms of conjunctivitis, commonly known as ‘pink eye’, and was given antiviral medication for treatment of the flu. 

What might interest you is a similar case of transmission that took place in Colorado in 2022. The infected individual, who had been working around HPAI-infected poultry, tested positive for the disease and experienced fatigue as a symptom. Like the case in Texas, here too, an antiviral was used as a treatment for the individual.

Zoonotic diseases, or diseases that can be transmitted from animals to humans, are more common than you may think. In fact, the CDC tells us that a significant 60% of infectious diseases in humans are spread from animals and a whopping 75% of emerging diseases in people are found to come from animals. This makes our understanding and prevention of these diseases of paramount importance. 

In more shocking news, transmission can also occur between different animal species such as birds and cows. It’s as simple as this: when wild birds drink water and feed along their migratory path, they can expel the HPAI virus through their oral, urinary, and fecal secretions. This creates an environment where the virus can possibly infect mammals. 

Considering the environment in a feedlot, you can see how rapid the spread of the virus could be. Specially in herds that are densely packed together–where there’s an abundance of cow saliva, urine and feces–transmission among cows could be relatively effortless. It’s a startling thought, and one that should remind us all of the importance of practicing good hygiene not just for ourselves, but also for the livestock we maintain.

Why commercial dairy products are still considered safe for people

Although HPAI virus particles have been detected in pasteurized milk, it’s important to acknowledge that the risk of transmission is extremely low. However, the possibility of transmission in raw milk can’t be entirely dismissed. Joseph Lambson, PharmD, Director of the New Mexico Poison and Drug Information Center, and an Assistant Professor at the University of New Mexico College of Pharmacy, reassures us. He points out, “The FDA doesn’t have any concerns that our milk supply is contaminated and see no health threat or concerns for consumers at this time.”

He goes on to echo the FDA’s years-long warnings against consuming raw milk and products made from raw milk. The reason is quite clear: they increase the risk of infection. He underscores that this list of risky consumables may well include products affected by highly virulent forms of avian flu such as HPAI. To drive this point home, the FDA has issued warnings stating that raw milk can carry dangerous pathogens, including Salmonella, Listeria, and Campylobacter. 

On the brighter side, commercially available milk goes through a rigorous pasteurization process. The treatment heats, then cools the milk to destroy pathogens. This process has been a cornerstone of public health measures for over a century in the United States. Sylvia Ley, PhD, an Assistant Professor of Epidemiology at Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, explains, “Pasteurization is required by the FDA if you’re moving milk products from one state to another. They have to follow a specific temperature and time. That should kill the virus. The inactive virus may be present, but it won’t be able to multiply, so you can drink it safely.” 

While viral fragments may survive the pasteurization process, they do not pose a risk to consumer health. On a reassuring note, both the FDA and the USDA have confirmed that milk from sick cows is actively being routed away from the public food supply. This alone significantly reduces the chances of any contamination reaching consumers. 

Lambson encourages anyone who suspects they may have consumed a contaminated product to reach out to their local poison control center. Not only can the centers provide medical advice about potential symptoms and treatment options, they can also track upticks in exposures to toxins or contaminants – a crucial factor in identifying potential health issuesearly.

The Bottom Line

In conclusion, despite the recent detection of avian influenza in dairy milk by the FDA, there is great comfort in knowing that it poses little to no risk to us when consuming commercial milk products, thanks to the pasteurization process. It’s important, however, to be mindful when consuming raw milk, where the virus could potentially be present. Notably, it’s worth highlighting that human transmission of this virus is still remarkably rare, with only two recent known cases reported. As we venture into an era of increasing vigilance and refined testing, let’s maintain our faith in the resilience and safety of our food system.

Summary: Bird flu, a highly contagious virus, has been detected in dairy milk in the US, prompting the FDA and CDC to investigate its presence in dairy cows and their milk. The virus, known as Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza (HPAI), is often deadly in poultry but not easily transmissible to humans. Despite the detection of HPAI in raw milk and traces in grocery store milk, commercial dairy products are considered safe due to pasteurization. The risk of transmission is extremely low, but raw milk can carry dangerous pathogens like Salmonella, Listeria, and Campylobacter. The FDA and USDA have confirmed that milk from sick cows is being routed away from the public food supply, reducing the chances of contamination reaching consumers.

Discover how Colombia’s recent restrictions on US beef imports are linked to an avian influenza outbreak in dairy cows. What does this mean for global trade?

In a ground-breaking move, Colombia has officially limited trade in beef due to concerns over avian influenza in dairy cows. This decree, which came into effect on April 15, targets beef and beef products originating from U.S. states where dairy cows have tested positive for avian influenza, according to a report by Reuters that cites the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA). This bold measure is the first of its kind and signifies the widening economic impact the virus is having, which has notably influenced the global poultry trade. Worth mentioning is that Colombia only imports a minor amount of U.S. beef each year, as per government records and market analyst findings. 

The USDA’s Food Safety and Inspection Service website was updated with a fresh notice this week (as of April 22), specifying the ban’s particulars. This restriction applies to beef products derived from cattle slaughtered in Idaho, Kansas, Michigan, New Mexico, North Carolina, Ohio, South Dakota, and Texas, according to the notice. Temporary restrictions were also placed on raw bovine meat products. However, it’s crucial to note that shipments with a valid import permit may still be held at port for ongoing inspections. 

“We don’t feel that import restrictions related to the avian flu outbreak have any scientific basis,” said Joe Schuele, a spokesman for the U.S. Meat Export Federation, “It’s certainly a big deal for exporters who are doing business in Colombia and for their customers.”

In an effort to contain the avian influenza outbreak, which was first detected in late March in Texas and has since been found in eight states and 33 dairy herds, the U.S. government stated it will begin requiring dairy cattle moving between states to be tested for bird flu starting Monday. This government mandate follows an unsettling event when a person exposed to livestock contracted the disease and developed conjunctivitis. Yet, reassuringly, there has been no case of U.S. beef cattle testing positive for avian influenza to date, according to government officials. 

In light of this unprecedented event, Colombia is the only country so far to have officially imposed restrictions on U.S. beef exports due to the H5N1 outbreak. USDA officials and Colombian authorities are in dialog about this issue, and trading partners have requested detailed information on the government’s epidemiology findings. USDA’s Chief Veterinary Officer, Rosemary Sifford, in a webinar held last Thursday, stated their willingness to respond to these inquiries in hopes of mitigating any trade impacts.

Summary: Colombia has imposed restrictions on US beef imports due to an avian influenza outbreak in dairy cows. The decree, effective on April 15, targets beef and beef products originating from US states where dairy cows have tested positive for the virus. This is the first of its kind and signifies the widening economic impact of the virus on global poultry trade. Colombia only imports a minor amount of U.S. beef each year, according to government records and market analyst findings. Temporary restrictions were also placed on raw bovine meat products. Despite this unprecedented event, there have been no cases of U.S. beef cattle testing positive for avian influenza to date. Colombia is the only country to have officially imposed restrictions on U.S. beef exports due to the H5N1 outbreak.

Concerned about what’s in your milk? Discover how the FDA found traces of avian influenza virus in 20% of commercial milk samples. Stay informed, stay safe.

Could you imagine that about one in five samples of commercial milk in the United States tested positive for traces of avian influenza? That’s what a national survey found, with a higher proportion of these samples coming from areas with infected herds, according to a report by Reuters citing the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on Friday. 

Now, before you start worrying, remember that there is no evidence that the milk poses a danger or that a live virus is present, as the regulator emphasized. As a matter of fact, the FDA announced late on Thursday that more testing is planned to ascertain if the full pathogen is still present and if it remains infectious. 

“The agency specified earlier this week that if the milk is heated to a particular temperature, it remains safe for human consumption as this process effectively kills harmful bacteria and viruses.”

Eight states in the US have confirmed cases of avian influenza in dairy cattle according to the US Department of Agriculture. Yet, of all the people potentially exposed, only a Texas farm worker has been confirmed to have contracted bird flu. The patient’s only symptom was eye inflammation, according to the state’s health department. 

So, while the presence of the virus in milk samples certainly merits attention and investigation, it’s notable that the implications for public health appear to be limited at this stage. The FDA reminds that the usual safety measures and protocols still stand – a simple heat treatment can ensure milk continues to nourish us without posing a risk.

 Summary: A national survey found that 20% of commercial milk samples in the United States tested positive for traces of avian influenza, with a higher proportion of samples coming from areas with infected herds. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has announced that more testing is planned to determine if the full pathogen is still present and if it remains infectious. The FDA has stated that if milk is heated to a specific temperature, it remains safe for human consumption as this process effectively kills harmful bacteria and viruses. Eight states in the US have confirmed cases of avian influenza in dairy cattle, but only a Texas farm worker has been confirmed to have contracted bird flu. While the presence of the virus in milk samples warrants attention and investigation, the implications for public health appear to be limited at this stage. The FDA reminds that the usual safety measures and protocols still stand, and a simple heat treatment can ensure milk continues to nourish us without posing a risk.

Discover how Algeria’s monumental $3.5B deal with a Qatari firm will revolutionize the dairy industry by creating the world’s largest dairy farm. Will this change the global dairy landscape?

Imagine this: a landscape once barren and bereft, now becoming home to the world’s largest integrated dairy farmingand production project. A colossal project that’s ready to kickstart a new chapter in global dairy production. That vision is about to become reality, courtesy of a groundbreaking deal inked between the Algerian Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development and a Qatari food giant. The agreement, worth a staggering $3.5 billion, sets the stage for a transformative venture in the heart of Africa. 

“$3.5 billion agreement authored with a Qatari food titan, heralds the dawn of an unprecedented initiative in the dairy industry. This joint venture will unfold in the south of Algeria, revolutionising a region, a country, and potentially the world’s perception of Africa’s dairy potential.”

Yep, you heard that right! For Africa, the deal marks a massive leap forward in the dairy industry. The south of Algeria, already notable for its rich agriculture, stands poised to become the host of a project that is not only promising to be the world’s largest but also one that aligns seamlessly with global sustainability practices and local development needs. 

Now, let’s unpack the details of this mammoth deal and visualize how it intends to redraw the world’s dairy map.

With Baladna, Qatar’s leading dairy producer, at the helm and a whopping $3.5 billion at their disposal, Algeria looks towards a promising future for their dairy industry. This groundbreaking partnership plans to set up the world’s largest integrated dairy farming and milk production project in Algeria’s southern region. While Baladna stands to maintain a controlling stake of 51% ownership of the project, Algeria’s National Investment Fund will hold the balance of 49%. 

The envisioned project will cover a sprawling 170,000 hectares in the Adrar province. It will house three distinct hubs: an arable farming operation, a dairy and beef farming enterprise, and a powdered milk manufacturing facility. It’s worth noting that the dairy farm alone is expected to host a robust herd of 270,000 cattle, with an ambitious production capacity of 1.7 billion liters of milk annually. 

Algeria’s Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development anticipates two key benefits from this potentially transformative deal. Firstly, the domestic production of powdered milk will sharply reduce the country’s reliance on imports. To illustrate, in 2022 alone, Algeria imported over $1.62 billion worth of concentrated milk, making it the world’s second-largest importer of the substance. Secondly, the project aims to create jobs for the Algerian youth, a move geared towards addressing unemployment challenges. 

At its core, this initiative targets more than just large-scale milk production. It intends to leverage modern technology and best management practices to streamline dairy farming, cut down production costs through economies of scale, and ensure total control over the entire value chain. This focus on efficiency points to a sustainable, long-term vision for Algeria’s dairy industry. 

Spanning decades, Algeria’s struggle with milk shortages has been a subject of much public discontent, seen vividly in the queues for rationed, subsidized milk and the outcry on social media. This collaboration with Baladna could hold the key to easing these pressures and marking a new chapter in Algeria’s milk production history.

Summary: Algeria has signed a $3.5 billion deal with Qatari food giant Baladna to establish the world’s largest dairy farm in the southern region of Algeria. The deal, worth $3.5 billion, aims to create the world’s largest integrated dairy farming and milk production project. The project will cover 170,000 hectares in the Adrar province and will house three distinct hubs: an arable farming operation, a dairy and beef farming enterprise, and a powdered milk manufacturing facility. The dairy farm is expected to host a robust herd of 270,000 cattle, with an ambitious production capacity of 1.7 billion liters of milk annually. Algeria’s Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development anticipates two key benefits from the deal: reducing the country’s reliance on imports and creating jobs for the Algerian youth. The initiative aims to leverage modern technology and best management practices to streamline dairy farming, cut down production costs, and ensure total control over the entire value chain.

Dairy Farmers of Canada (DFC) and Starbucks Canada (Starbucks) have launched today a new collaborative effort to help advance sustainability in the dairy sector. Starbucks has committed $500,000 to support dairy sustainability-focused projects over the course of this year, rewarding the continued efforts of Canadian dairy farmers on their path to net zero.

The partnership includes three exciting projects, the first of which is already underway for 2024 in collaboration with Farm Credit Canada (FCC) and Lactanet for FCC’s Dairy Sustainability Incentive Program. This program rewards farmers who are successfully adopting environmental best management practices and encourages continued sustainable farming by granting annual incentives of up to $2,000 to FCC customers who meet select criteria. As part of its partnership with DFC and overall investment for the year, Starbucks will provide additional funding to the FCC program in two new categories, Top Achieving and Most Improved, further recognizing the sustainability successes of Canadian dairy farmers.

“The support of Starbucks will help recognize more farmers’ commitment to environmental management and show Canadians that sustainability begins with the people producing their food,” said David Wiens, President of Dairy Farmers of Canada. “When farmers set out to achieve net-zero emissions by 2050, we knew we would not go it alone. DFC welcomes Starbucks as they join us on this leg of the journey.”

Dairy is an integral part of the Starbucks menu, and supporting the long-term health of the Canadian dairy sector is one of the latest efforts in the company’s global commitment to a resource-positive future – giving more than it takes from the planet by reducing the company’s carbon emissions, water usage and landfill waste by 50% by 2030. This collaboration with DFC builds on both organizations’ strong record of supporting sustainability, as Canadian milk production continues to have one of the lowest carbon footprints in the world.

“At Starbucks, we are committed to working alongside others to help our communities thrive and protect the planet. As a company that relies on the dairy sector every day, we have a responsibility to innovate and collaborate to source dairy responsibly and sustainably,” said Lori Digulla, Senior Vice-President and General Manager for Starbucks Canada. “With DFC, we hope to combine the best knowledge and resources together to help the farmer community in Canada and ensure a sustainable future of dairy for all.”

“At FCC, bringing the industry together for an opportunity like this is a key part of how we are supporting a strong and sustainable future for Canadian agriculture and food,” said Curtis Grainger, FCC Director of Sustainability Programs. “Starbucks’ commitment to FCC’s Dairy Sustainability Incentive Program is a great example of partnerships supporting the valuable work of Canadian dairy farmers.”

Farmer applications are scheduled to reopen for the Sustainability Incentive Program on May 21, 2024. For more information, please visit fcc.ca/sustainabilityprograms.

In the glitzy world of the Grammys and Oscars, an unexpected topic of discussion emerged – Ozempic, a drug designed to suppress the appetite. It belongs to the semaglutide class of GLP-1 drugs, which are primarily used to treat Type 2 diabetes by regulating blood sugar. Experts estimate that about 5% of Americans use a GLP-1 drug, but those using Ozempic strictly for weight loss make up an even smaller portion of the population. 

According to Darren Seifer from Circana, approximately 30% of Americans have expressed interest in the drug, but its accessibility is currently limited. The steep cost of a prescription, around $1,000 per month, means that only consumers with disposable income or those who benefit from a co-pay arrangement through a prescription can afford sustained usage. However, should the drug become more affordable and approachable, it’s something marketing and retail companies need to keep on their radars. 

“Until then, it is too early to predict changes in food retail sales associated with Ozempic and other GLP-1 drugs.” – Darren Seifer, Circana

Findings from research conducted by Seifer’s company, The New Consumer, revealed something interesting. Surveyed Americans across all age groups, excluding Gen Z, expressed a desire to be 25% healthier. This is hardly surprising given the fact that 40% of adult Americans are dealing with obesity. 

‘Longevity’ may be a growing buzzword, but it opens up discussion about the necessity of drugs to achieve a healthier weight. Do these medications promote wellness, replace healthier lifestyle practices, or draw concerns about long-term effects? It emphasizes the need for individuals to consult with medical professionals when considering a new medication and highlights the value of integrating all forms of healthy habits into their daily routines for optimal wellness results. Hopefully, this includes indulging in a healthy serving of nutritious dairy products.

Although it’s a bit early to discern the full impact of GLP-1 drugs on consumer habits, their usage might indeed boost the dairy industry. Dairy foods, with their high protein content and an abundance of essential nutrients, could be a prime choice for those using Ozempic. They’re seeking fulfilling, health-focused food purchases, and dairy certainly fits the bill. 

Snack food companies, on the other hand, might need to think about a rebrand or introducing options with smaller portions. If the Ozempic trend becomes dominant, there’s a chance consumers will move away from tempting, fast-fix options. This was a sentiment agreed upon by Dan Frommer, a co-guest on the podcast, who believes it’s too early to forecast the changes in food retail sales tied to Ozempic and other GLP-1 drugs. 

Interestingly, Frommer referred to research conducted by his company, ‘The New Consumer’. The research shows that when faced with a choice between being 25% healthier or having a 25% higher income, Americans from all generations (except Gen Z) opted for better health. Given that around 40% of adult Americans are categorized as obese, this choice doesn’t surprise much. It does, however, highlight how severe the health situation is for many. 

“At the highest level, Americans are not well,” Frommer noted. Or to put it more plainly, a drug that can mitigate heart disease and weight gain can lead to longer lives – and that’s something society seems to be rooting for. 

Resorting to drugs to obtain a healthy weight makes for a profound statement about our society. Do these medicines foster wellness lifestyles, or do they replace them? What are the long-term effects, and does discontinuing the medication pave the way for regression? Frommer and Seifer stress that these questions need to be asked, even if answers are not immediately available. 

For those who necessitate the drug for medical reasons and experience relief, the reviews are almost universally positive. Always remember, everyone is unique, and any drug will affect each person differently. As you consider a new medication, it’s imperative to discuss your options with a medical professional and incorporate all forms of healthy lifestyle habits into your daily routine. This will hopefully include regular servings of nutritious dairy products.

Discover how Olympian Katie Ledecky’s partnership with Fairlife’s Core Power is set to redefine athletic nutrition. Will this be the game-changer in sports?

Core Power, the longstanding official protein drink of Team USA, and a product produced by Fairlife, has been intimately involved in the support of Olympians across the nation, delivering the recovery benefits of milk. Yet, this month, they announced their commitment to the Olympics has expanded. In a thrilling development, Core Power has unveiled a multi-year partnership with one of the most highly decorated female swimmers of all time and a long-time Core Power fan, Katie Ledecky. 

Reportedly, the strategic partnership with Katie Ledecky aims to harness her authentic recovery moments. The objective is to educate and inspire athletes of all levels about the decisive importance of post-workout recovery. These unique moments are slated to be brought alive via Core Power’s “Champion Your Recovery” campaign. The innovative campaign is due to launch across digital and social channels this month and hit television screens by the summer. 

“Whether you’re an Olympic athlete training tirelessly for this year’s games or embarking on your personal fitness journey, we want to assert that the nutrition of Core Power can genuinely benefit everyone,” opines Erica Rosskamm, Vice President of Brand Marketing at Fairlife. “When we learned that Core Power was already a vital part of Katie’s training regimen, we knew we had found a perfect match. Katie’s accomplishments and unrivaled dedication are inspiring in themselves but her emphasis on nutritional recovery can serve as a guiding light for all fitness enthusiasts.”

“Whether you’re an Olympic athlete training tirelessly for this year’s games or embarking on your personal fitness journey, we want to assert that the nutrition of Core Power can genuinely benefit everyone,” opines Erica Rosskamm, Vice President of Brand Marketing at Fairlife. “When we learned that Core Power was already a vital part of Katie’s training regimen, we knew we had found a perfect match. Katie’s accomplishments and unrivaled dedication are inspiring in themselves but her emphasis on nutritional recovery can serve as a guiding light for all fitness enthusiasts.”

Despite being one of the most celebrated female athletes of all time, Ledecky is also famed in the dairy industry due to her advocacy of milk. Interestingly, in 2020 the Olympic gold medalist created a viral sensation by swimming the entire length of an Olympic-size swimming pool with a glass of chocolate milk balanced on her head. 

“I thought it could be interesting to attempt swimming a lap with a glass of chocolate milk on my head; the stunt surprisingly turned out to be a success,” shares Ledecky. “I tried it out and the video that I uploaded was my very first take with the milk. Although I had practiced a few times before, I did so without the milk to be extra cautious.”

Interestingly, the use of dairy in refueling has been a central part of Ledecky’s training program for numerous years. Hence this novel partnership seemed like a natural progression. 

“I’ve been swimming my entire life, and as my training became more intense, I quickly understood the prominent role of nutrition and recovery in preparing for my next session,” admits Ledecky. “Reaching out for a Core Power has become an instinctive part of my routine. Packed with protein, electrolytes, and essential nutrients, and coupled with great taste, this product has been aiding my swimming journey for years. I’m thrilled to officially collaborate with the Core Power team. My aim is to share how this product has been beneficial to me over the years, and hopefully inspire all fitness enthusiasts to enhance their recovery routine by incorporating Core Power.”

Stay tuned, and watch out for Katie Ledecky’s performance at the upcoming Olympic Trials due in June 2024, hosted at the Lucas Oil Stadium in Indianapolis. 

Fairlife and The Coca-Cola Company have officially broken ground on a new state-of-the-art fairlife production facility in the Town of Webster, New York. The facility, which will serve as fairlife’s flagship Northeast location, represents a $650 million investment into the region and is expected to generate approximately 250 jobs in the greater Webster, New York, area. The dairy industry is a vital economic driver for New York state and represents its leading agricultural sector. The Town of Webster was strategically chosen by The Coca-Cola Company and fairlife teams for its proximity to the state’s best-in-class dairy co-operatives in the Rochester and Niagara regions.

The new facility will span 745,000 square feet and stand on a lot of approximately 110 acres. It will take in five to six million pounds of milk per day from local dairy farmers, which will help support ongoing local dairy farm jobs. The new facility will be optimized for sustainability, using improved efficiencies, new hardware, and better monitoring to lessen its environmental footprint. Specifically, the Webster facility will have technology that uses stormwater for irrigation and cooling; electric vehicle chargers and designated parking spaces; LED intelligent control lighting with clock times, delay timers, photocells, and occupancy sensors; and automatic conveyors and HVAC systems that switch off when not in use.

The production facility is anticipated to be operational starting in Q4 2025. Fairlife launched in 2012 with the belief that milk and its natural health benefits can be made even better. Today, the company leverages ultra-filtration to create great-tasting products that nourish consumers and fit into their modern lifestyles. With more than $1 billion in annual retail sales, fairlife offers a wide range of products including fairlife® ultra-filtered milk, Core Power® protein shakes, and fairlife® Nutrition Plan® meal replacement shakes.

The Coca-Cola Company has been a strategic partner to fairlife since it was launched in 2012, culminating with the company’s ultimate acquisition of fairlife in 2020. This proposed facility represents its ongoing investment in the continued growth of fairlife.

 Imagine being able to rapidly test animals for antibiotic treatments, efficiently and economically. Well, the team at Wageningen Food Safety Research (WFSR) has brought this vision to life. They’ve developed a groundbreaking method that permits immediate insight into antibiotic use. 

 Employing a nifty technique known as a ‘swipe sample’, the test evaluates a sample of an animal’s skin to establish the antibiotics administered, even if the treatment is already complete. The swift revealing of information doesn’t just stop there. The test, remarkably, can trace antibiotics on a molecular level in any material derived from animals. Think chicken treats! 

“The rapid test allows researchers to find traces of antibiotics at the molecular level, even in dead animal material like chicken treats. It provides immediate results and is an attractive alternative to expensive and slow laboratory tests on antibiotic residues in milk and meat.”

 This swift detection method also passes the affordability test. Who wouldn’t love an attractive alternative to costly, time-consuming laboratory tests on antibiotic residues in milk and meat? However, as promising as this sounds, it’s essential to note that the test isn’t completely ready for application in practice – yet. Researchers are still investigating if antibiotic traces can be transmitted to animals. 

 Yet, the potential of this innovation doesn’t just rest with antibiotics. The WFSR researchers also envision more captivating applications for these prompt tests utilizing similar technology. They could be instrumental in examining batches of raw animal feed materials for harmful fungi and toxins. A quick test done in the port could determine if the parties can immediately release feed based on favourable outcomes. 

 Intriguing, right? Couldn’t agree more. Here’s to revolutionizing, shaping, and improving the future of food safety. 

Get ready for a fish-out-of-water journey into the world of dairy farming with Emmy-nominated sketch comedian and actress Vanessa Bayer. Brought to you by U.S. dairy farmers, processors and importers, “Dairy Diaries” premieres on April 22 exclusively on the Roku Channel in the U.S. and takes viewers behind the scenes at Beck Farms, a fourth-generation dairy in upstate New York.

Dairy Diaries follows Bayer as she is thrust into the unfamiliar world of dairy farming at Beck Farms. Through Bayer’s experiences, viewers get an up-close look at the realities of modern dairy farming and the innovative sustainability and animal care practices shaping the industry’s future. From the journey of milk from farm to fridge to the role of dairy in fostering a healthier, more sustainable world, Dairy Diaries delivers laughs and an enlightening exploration of today’s modern dairy farm.

“As someone who consumes more dairy, and specifically cheese, than I’d like to admit, I wanted to learn about how milk gets from the farm to the store,” Bayer said. “I was particularly interested to hear how the industry is working to become more sustainable because obviously, we all gotta get moo-ving in that department! While I didn’t get as much free ice cream as I had hoped, I learned a lot, and I think the audience will as well.”

U.S. dairy is committed to leading innovations in new products, technologies and on-farm practices that will contribute to healthier people, planet and animals. Dairies such as Beck Farms have implemented closed-loop circular processes, using their cows’ manure to grow their feed on-farm, which reduces carbon emissions and helps ensure a legacy of sustainability for future generations. Thanks to increasingly modern and innovative dairy farming practices, the environmental impact of producing a gallon of milk has shrunk significantly, requiring 30% less water, 21% less land, and a 19% smaller carbon footprint than it did in 2007.

“We loved sharing our farm with Vanessa and are excited to share it with the world,” says Tyler Beck, owner of Beck Farms. “We hope Dairy Diaries shows the great pride we take in our responsibility to nourish families with delicious dairy foods. So while it may seem odd to some, we wouldn’t give up the 3:30 a.m. wake-ups for anything.”

Throughout Dairy Diaries, viewers also will have an opportunity to meet other experts who contribute to life on the dairy farm, including Dr. Joe McFadden, associate professor of dairy cattle biology at Cornell University, and Dr. Laura Brown, a veterinarian.

Dr. McFadden explains the innovative research he is shepherding to optimize feed, such as including seaweed in cows’ diets, which may help reduce their methane emissions by up to 90%. Dr. Brown details the many ways she helps keep cows and calves healthy with weekly visits to Beck Farms.

Dairy Diaries will be available to stream for free on a Roku device, the Roku mobile app, therokuchannel.com, plus Samsung Smart TV, Amazon Fire TV and Google TV.

To learn more about the dairy checkoff, visit www.usdairy.com.

In a shocking turn of events that has left both local and distant dairy farming communities reeling, the Pennsylvania State Veterinary Board took action through the Department of State, Professional Compliance Office. They executed a “contempt of court” order through local law enforcement, even though none of these agencies are actual courts. 

Rusty Herr of Christiana and Ethan Wentworth of Airville, two dairymen with young families, have been sitting in jail since last week, denied bail and due process. They have not had the chance to see a judge. And for what? For employing ultrasound technology on dairy cows and horses – without a veterinary license – as part of their NoBull Solutions breeding service. 

These two men are among the three individuals who were slapped with the State Vet Board’s cease-and-desist orders as recently as 2018 and 2020. Astonishingly, the state is effectively treating pregnancy as a disease; a standpoint that contradicts federal court rulings that deem pregnancy to be a condition, not a disease. This position even contradicts the Veterinary Medicine Practice Act in Pennsylvania, which makes no explicit mention of pregnancy, giving a certain discretion to the state board on the matter. Notably, the board’s regulations don’t define diagnosis, neither do they mention pregnancy or ultrasound. 

According to the nationally acclaimed Barnes Law LLP, which is serving as the NoBull legal defense team since their enlistment a week after the dairymen’s arrests, “Pregnancy is not a disease. Pregnancy is not an illness. Likewise, confirming pregnancy or successful reproduction is not a diagnosis. Medicinal definitions are clear: identification of disease is termed diagnosis, the solution design is called treatment planning, and treatment where appropriate is then implemented as the solution.”

In stark contrast, dozens of technicians across Pennsylvania are known to use ultrasound technology with livestock, aligning with reproductive services. However, for their actions, Herr and Wentworth find themselves forcibly separated from their families. They were incarcerated for a week and were informed that they’ll remain jailed for 30 more days. 

The circumstances surrounding their arrests are indeed troubling. For example, Wentworth was asked to pay a fine at the York county courthouse on the morning of April 10, with a promise that he would see a judge. Instead, he was arrested, and seven days later, he still hasn’t seen a judge, according to friend and associate Ben Masemore, a dairy farmer associated with sister business NoBull Sires LLC. 

Herr was arrested the next day, April 11, at 6:30 a.m. at his home in Christiana. He was cuffed and taken away in front of his wife and children, reveals Masemore in a phone interview with Farmshine. Robert Barnes, Esq. of Barnes Law LLP, the new lead attorney for the Herr/Wentworth and NoBull Solutions defense, argues that the arrest warrants weren’t “facially valid” as they didn’t originate from a court. 

Robert Barnes, Esq. has taken the NoBull Solutions defense case, promising justice for Ethan and Rusty and their families. He discussed it on his Viva Locals podcast on April 17, stating that “a whole bunch of folks are about to get sued” and quoting unlawful detainment and civil rights precedents, among others. 

According to the Pennsylvania Veterinary Medical Association (PaVMA) website under “advocacy” that the contempt-of-court charge came off a suggestion in PaVMA’s recent complaint against Herr and Wentworth for ignoring previous fines and cease-and-desist orders from the state veterinary board. However, Herr and Wentworth ignored these fines based on their former attorney’s advice, to avoid admitting guilt. After all, why should they admit guilt for actions that are commonplace and subject to the interpretation of the state’s vague and outdated veterinary law regarding ‘diagnosis’? Especially when pregnancy isn’t a disease that is diagnosed, but a condition to be observed? 

The debate will no doubt continue, overcoming archaic laws and challenging unfair practices. One thing is certain: We will closely monitor these developments, tracking the situation, and relaying to you, our readers, the most accurate and timely information.

A “NoBull Solutions LLC Defense Fund” has been set up for the men on GiveSendGo and at local banks. For more information, call 717-887-6465.

The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) has confirmed that the bird flu outbreak on dairy farms could be far graver than initially perceived. Evidence seems to suggest that the virus is not just proliferating amongst cows, but also transmitting from cows to poultry. This revelation comes after officials in North Carolina identified bird flu infections in a symptomless cattle herd, a fact yet to be publicly disclosed by the USDA. This discovery leads us to believe that these infections may be significantly more widespread than initially estimated. 

The Department of Agriculture currently does not mandate farms to test their cattle for infection. Prior to this week, their policy was to reimburse farmers only for testing visibly ill cows, limiting the compensation to 20 cows per farm. However, the department has now announced that it will start reimbursing farms for testing asymptomatic cows. It’s crucial to mention that Federal officials, so far, have only shared sparse genetic information about the virus with foreign scientists and officials. This is critical data that could aid in understanding how the virus is evolving and spreading. 

Interestingly, the federal officials have turned a blind eye to monitoring infections in pigs. Pigs, renowned for being highly effective hosts for evolving flu viruses, are frequently kept in close proximity to cattle, leading to potential cross-species infection risks. 

“The federal response so far echoes early missteps during the pandemic, demonstrating an unsettling lack of learning from the communication lessons that COVID-19 has taught us.”

In a joint statement released in March, the USDA, Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention assured the public of the safety of pasteurized milk. However, the FDA is still conducting tests to ascertain whether the pasteurization process effectively eliminates the virus. Some experts argue that these agencies may have been premature in asserting milk safety even before they had supporting data, in spite of the purported low risk to humans. 

Despite the urgency, USDA staff are primarily focusing on the analysis of only viral genetic sequences drawn from sick cows. However, they have assured that they will release this crucial information for outside experts in the “very, very near future”. 

The bird flu outbreak, unfortunately, has permeated 32 herds in eight states, including Texas, New Mexico, Michigan, Kansas, Idaho, Ohio, North Carolina, and South Dakota. This version of the virus has been circulating since 2020 in poultry, wild birds, and a wide range of mammals. As of this Friday afternoon, the outbreak has infiltrated 32 herds across the eight aforementioned states. 

The virus, scientifically known as H5N1, primarily affects lactating cows and only temporarily impacts their health. Still, the potential spillover from cows to poultry presents a situation of grave concern. The Texas Animal Health Commission suspects that the virus may have been transported between them through contact with objects contaminated with virus-laden milk. Infected cows, disturbingly, appear to carry large amounts of the virus in their milk. 

Some experts have voiced their criticisms of the USDA’s testing recommendations, citing that farmers may not have noticed many infections simply because they were not searching for them. Widespread and comprehensive testing strategies, inclusive of symptomatic and asymptomatic animals, is incredibly important in the early stages of such outbreaks to duly comprehend the scale and possible mechanisms of viral transmission. 

In this context, pigs play a crucial role in flu surveillance due to their susceptibility to both avian and human flu viruses. However, the lack of government directives to test pigs or encourage farmers to do so may present a considerable blind spot in our disease surveillance efforts. 

The federal response has frustrated several state health departments and farmers. Some farms in Minnesota have taken matters into their own hands and are sending samples of cow blood to private labs for testing. Other dairy farmers, however, are reluctant to test, fearing that the stigma associated with bird flu could negatively impact their business. Moreover, currently, dairy farmers are grappling with decreased milk prices and inflated feed costs, adding to the reluctance. Federal officials share the responsibility of equipping farmers with more resources and better protective gear and should commit to transparent communication.

The last communication regarding this outbreak from the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, a division of the USDA, was released on April 2.

The European Dairy Association (EDA) Policy Conference in Brussels, Belgium, convened on April 10 to deliberate the future of dairy and the trials agricultural producers in the EU are experiencing. Owing to the EU Green Deal and other policies perceived as detrimental to their businesses, right-leaning and populist parties have ardently supported the farmers’ cause, thereby bolstering their poll standings. The conference provided a stage for three MEP candidates to present their future visions for dairy and engage in Q&A sessions with attendees, including representatives from food manufacturers, trade associations, and governments.

Jessika Van Leeuwen of the Netherlands’ Farmer-Citizen Movement, and Didier Leportois from France’s Rural Alliance, conjointly voiced the farmer’s plight. They expressed that farmers have been under duress due to European policies in recent years. The duo also argued that EU produce should be safeguarded from imitation products in the export markets and urged for a more flexible approach towards land use regulations and emissions reductions.

Van Leeuwen stated, “Farmer protests have helped mitigate some of the most oppressive regulations, but it might be too late.” She urged the EU to protect fertile lands and promote food production, echoing a scheme similar to Nature 2000. Van Leeuwen also proposed radical changes such as scrapping the nature restoration law, banning hybrid dairy products, and avoiding on-farm ESG measures. She passionately pleaded, “Convert the Green Deal into a Real Deal, where objectives are realistic and affordable.”

At the conference, diverse perspectives were encouraged. Hansen advocated for a more empathetic approach towards agri-food producers, arguing that farmers are often misjudged as the problem, neglecting their potential as the solution. The focus, he insisted, should be on technologies that could decarbonize or trim down agriculture’s emissions rather than purely numeric targets. Van Leeuwen added that they advocate a constant development towards sustainable and highly productive agriculture, absolving the sector from rigid rules, leaving more room for innovation.

European regulators, represented by Wolfgang Burtscher, the Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development in the European Commission, emphasized the importance of a data-driven approach. This approach aims to showcase the sector’s progress fitting within the broader EU27 context. However, Burtscher candidly acknowledged that they are lagging behind when it comes to accurately measuring the results of these measures.

Van Leeuwen and Leportois expressed their opposition to regulatory emissions reduction strategies. Van Leeuwen argued the timelines for setting targets are too broad, leaving little room for creativity and innovation, she advocates for a gradual approach to measures. Leportois echoed a similar sentiment, advocating for slow and steady change, enabling the people to adapt and be part of the system.

On the topic of dietary alternatives, Van Leeuwen proposed banning hybrid dairy products due to their dubious nutritional profile and unclear pricing strategy. However, this area remains contentious within the EU, especially with labeling rules and dairy alternative representation. While dairy alternative products are currently prohibited from using familiar descriptors like ‘butter’ and ‘cheese’, concrete evidence is lacking on whether consumers are truly confused between dairy and its alternatives.

Representatives from food companies and dairy cooperatives also shared their views on the subject of target-setting, emissions reporting, land use policies, and sustainability incentives. This included map-outs of their emissions reduction targets as well as their approach towards land use and other regulations.

In conclusion, debates around target-setting, emissions reporting, land use policies, and sustainability incentives linger. While some argue for less stringent measures to stimulate innovation, others believe a more standardized approach is crucial in maintaining the quality of dairy products and the environment.

The National Association of State Departments of Agriculture (NASDA) is gearing up to tackle the potential threats posed by the Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza (HPAI) on dairy farms in the coming fall. As of now, eight states have reported the presence of the virus in their poultry populations. 

It has been four days since the USDA has confirmed any new case, pointing perhaps to a slowdown in virus detections. However, the virus is predicted to linger around in the coming months, making it a prolonged concern for the agricultural sector. 

“Our paramount goal is to keep the number of detections as low as possible,” states NASDA.

As part of an extensive plan dedicated to manage the occurrence and spread of HPAI, State Department of Agriculture leaders are holding regular biweekly sessions. The major objective behind these meetings is to ensure a smooth exchange of the latest information related to HPAI and to discuss the impacts it can have across state lines. NASDA is vigilant about preparing for such scenarios, as they brace for the possibility of HAPI’s potential threat to our dairy farms this fall.

Cooking up exciting new dairy products is about to become a whole lot easier! Launched in 2023 by Cornell University’s Center for Regional Economic Advancement, the Dairy Runway Program is a beacon of support for early-stage businesses. Backed by a generous grant from the New York State Department of Agriculture and Markets, its goal is simple – to guide innovators past the main hurdle for new products – the lack of alignment with market demand. 

In this novel program, an innovative blend of self-directed online learning and personalized one-on-one instructor support awaits any foodpreneur with a bright idea for a value-added, cow milk-based dairy product. If you’re based in New Yorkor the New England states, this could be your golden ticket! 

“Those who complete the virtual course phase advance to the kitchen incubator phase, which includes access to Cornell’s food processing facilities and support from food science technical experts. This hands-on phase lets innovators test product formulations and develop prototypes.”

But wait, there’s more! This program offers far more than just technological expertise. Business coaching is another perk on the agenda. To ensure dedicated attention, each cohort will only welcome a maximum of 10 teams, each consisting of up to two participants. 

Got a creamy creation brewing in your mind? Don’t let it curdle! Applications are open until June 5, 2024. But if you’re still unsure, don’t feel bullish. You can get the inside scoop at one of the three information sessions taking place in May. 

For more information about the program and how to apply, visit www.tfaforms.com/5115328​.

Webster, a humble town in New York and home to a burgeoning agricultural community, is set to receive a major boost to its economy with the construction of a $650 million dairy processing facility. The new facility is spearheaded by fairlife, a subsidiary of Coca-Cola and producer of ultra-filtered milk products. The groundbreaking ceremony was graced with the presence of Governor Kathy Hochul and several other officials, marking the official commencement of construction work. 

 This massive investment by Fairlife is expected to have far-reaching economic implications for the region, beyond the price tag associated with the plant itself. Notably, the project will create hundreds of construction jobs and will provide steady employment for over 250 people once the plant is fully operational. This venture highlights a substantial commitment to supporting the local agricultural community and its encompassing network of over 3,000 dairy farmers. 

At the groundbreaking ceremony, Tim Doelman, CEO of Fairlife, cited the region’s favorable climate and significant potential for workforce growth as primary factors behind their decision to pursue this investment. He commented, “This project is a testament to Fairlife’s commitment to harnessing the potential inherent in this region, and we’re looking forward to fostering even more economic growth as we move forward”.

Indeed, the establishment of the massive dairy processing plant signals a new era of growth and prosperity for Webster’s agricultural community and its citizenry at large. 

Rooted in the bucolic state of Pennsylvania, a narrative is unfolding that sees two men, Ruthy Herr and Ethan Wentworth, currently imprisoned. Their crime? Ultrasounding dairy cows and horses without possessing a veterinary license. Operating under their breeding service, NoBull Solutions, these individuals have been served cease-and-desist orders by the State Veterinary Board in both 2018 and 2020. This has sparked a controversial debate – is pregnancy a disease? 

Contrary to the state’s interpretation, federal courts have clarified that pregnancy is a condition, not a disease. Incidentally, the Veterinary Medicine Practice Act in Pennsylvania does not even mention pregnancy, rendering a scope for the state board’s interpretation. As per Barnes Law LLP, pregnancy is neither a disease nor an illness, and merely confirming pregnancy or successful reproduction is not equivalent to a diagnosis. Yet, Herr and Wentworth find themselves separated from their families, having already spent a week in captivity, with a looming threat of a full 30-day sentence. 

“The circumstances of their arrests are troubling,” recounts Robert Barnes, Esquire, the new lead attorney for the Herr/Wentworth and NoBull Solutions defense. He contends that the arrest warrants were flawed as they did not originate from a court, and thereby implicates the State Vet Board for conspiracy. According to Barnes, this conspiracy with inept local sheriffs has resulted in an illegal and unlawful imprisonment, a clear violation of both state and federal constitutions.

The charge of contempt-of-court was spurred by the Pennsylvania Veterinary Medical Association’s (PAVMA) recent complaint against Herr and Wentworth. PAVMA accused them of ignoring previous fines and cease-and-desist orders from the State Veterinary Board. Notably, these fines were overlooked upon the advice of their former attorney to avoid admitting to any guilt. 

The PAVMA complaint urged the State Vet Board to penalize three individuals employed with NoBull Solutions LLC with fines and cease-and-desist orders for “illegal practice of veterinary medicine by unlicensed individuals”. This casts a spotlight on the difference between diagnosis and observation, causing confusion as the state vet law only explicitly exempts equine farriers. 

Small to mid-sized farms, unlike larger operations which can afford to hire full-time veterinarians, nutritionists, and technicians, rely heavily on independent hires for their services. Pennsylvania alone has witnessed a shocking decline of 46% in its dairy farms from 2017 to 2022. This precarious situation demands a level playing field for farmers to survive the rapid consolidation of this industry. 

In response to these flagrant issues, PAVMA has escalated their endeavours, labelling the ultrasound concern as an advocacy position under the “illegal practice of veterinary medicine” banner. They have called upon their members to take action, furnishing downloadable blank forms and instructions. Their drive: to ensure the state remains cognizant of the ongoing issue. 

You can read a comprehensive story by Bunting HERE.

Imagine a company standing the test of time, delivering goodness in a glass bottle to doorsteps for nearly a century. That’s the story of Oberweise Dairy, a iconic home milk delivery company, headquarted in North Aurora, Illinois. However, as of late, this 97 year-old dairy business has had to file for bankruptcy, a sober moment not only for the company, but for the countless households who have faithfully awaited their glass-bottle deliveries over the years. Oberweise Dairy not only handled milk delivery, but successfully ran nearly 40 ice cream and dairy stores in both Illinois and Missouri.

Filing for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection last Friday in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Illinois, the company publicly exposed its financial challenges. In an effort of complete transparency, Oberweise Dairy listed more than $4 million of debt to 20 of its top unsecured creditors. 

Closer details of the owed amounts include top creditors such as Nussbaum Transportation of Hudson, Illinois, owed over $774,000; Greco & Sons, of Barlett, Illinois, owed nearly $722,000; and Penske Truck Leasing of Earth City, Missouri, owed more than $132,000. Worth noting, Oberweise Dairy’s petition also highlighted a debt over $173,000 that’s owed to the Cook County Treasurer’s Office in Chicago.

Unraveling the tapestry of Oberweise’s history takes us back to 1915, to the dairy farmer Peter Oberweise. What started as a personal initiative selling milk from the back of horse-drawn wagon has grown into nearly a century long venture. Now, Oberweise Dairy is helmed by the family of former Illinois State Senator, Jim Oberweise. Despite suffering losses in Republican primaries for both U.S senate and Governor, Jim maintained a successful stewardship of the family business until this unexpected financial bump.

Understanding the Reasons: Why the Illinois Milk Delivery Business Faced Bankruptcy

If we delve deeper into the circumstances leading to the bankruptcy, we’ll see that Oberweis Dairy, a century-old dairy family business in Illinois, has hit upon hard times. In the wake of unsuccessful attempts to sell, Oberweis Dairy was forced to seek the shelter of Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection. 

Undeniably, consumer trends can make a significant impact on any business. Unfortunately for Oberweis Dairy, the rising demand for dairy alternatives put a substantial strain on the company, as it was already dealing with the aftermath of some unwise capital expenditures. Gradually, this led the company to staggering financial hardships. 

The company also faced setbacks in their search for a buyer. A group of hopeful investors withdrew their stalking horse bid in late March. The unsuccessful bid subsequently pushed the company further down the path to bankruptcy protection. 

Adding to this financial distress, they were burdened with debt – owing more than $4 million to their 20 largest unsecured creditors. Moreover, the bankruptcy filing brought potential layoffs into sight for 127 workers, thus exacerbating the gravity of the situation. 

Jim Oberweis, the grandson of the company’s founder, made the daunting decision to sell the dairy last year. It was a desperate move to keep the company afloat, but this hope was quickly dashed when no buyers came forth. 

Conclusively, a combination of changing consumer preferences, imprudent financial decisions, and a failed attempt at a sale led to the downfall of this historic Illinois dairy. Filing for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection became their last resort as they tried to regroup and possibly reinvent the business in this ever-evolving market.

Effect on Dairy Farmers: The Ripple Effect of Bankruptcy

When a milk delivery business so venerable as Oberweis Dairy files for bankruptcy, there’s more than corporate distress to consider. This unfortunate event sends ripples of uncertainty throughout the dairy community. Often, it’s the dairy farmers who bear the brunt of this disruption. 

The bankruptcy of a major dairy outlet disrupts the steady stream of income farming families depend on. Often, these farmers have nurtured long-standing business relationships with the company. For such farmers, the bankruptcy is not just a commercial loss, but a collapse of an important part of their livelihood. 

Furthermore, with the company owing over $4 million to its 20 largest unsecured creditors, and an additional $14 million in secured bank debt, the extent of the bankruptcy’s impact is indeed significant. These might include suppliers, sub-contractors, or even local small businesses, all left to grapple with the consequences of this financial fallout. 

Knowing the potential for cascading loss and hardship, wouldn’t it be great if there were mechanisms in place to buffer these farmers from this risk? The reality, though, is that they often have little financial cover or disaster recovery strategies in place. The Oberweis bankruptcy, therefore, underscores the urgent need to invest in strategic safeguards for our invaluable dairy farmers. After all, they are the vital cogs in the wheels of our dairy supply chains. 

So, as you reach for your next dairy treat, spare a thought for the stout-hearted dairy farmers. They face risks and challenges on a wholly different level, and their resilience is central to keeping our tables laden with wholesome dairy goodness.

Efforts are underway by the Michigan Department of Agriculture and Rural Development to propose a new bovine tuberculosis testing area. This proposed area is located in the northern lower peninsula. According to the department, this proposed action comes after a wild deer tested positive for the disease back in February. Shockingly, this occurrence was outside of the state’s current Modified Accredited Zone, more specifically, in Benzie County. 

Understandably, you might be asking, why the need for this expansion? The answer is simple. The state needs to ably respond to this unexpected situation by expanding the zone into portions of both Benzie and Manistee counties. This serves to ensure compliance with its Memorandum of Understanding with the USDA and to maintain a split-state status. 

The stakes are high, as all cattle and bison herds in the new area will need to be tested before the end of the year to guarantee they are disease-free. It’s a hefty task, but a necessary one to prevent potential outbreaks.

Want to have your say on this proposed change? A public meeting is set for April 25th, a great opportunity for you to express your viewpoint. The best part is that in efforts to adhere to safety protocols, this meeting will also be available virtually. Furthermore, comments are being accepted up until May 10th. Don’t miss out on this opportunity to be heard.

On Tuesday, a significant announcement from the U.S. Department of Agriculture sent ripples through our dairy industry. The USDA has finalized changes to the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children, more commonly known as WIC. This federal program provides invaluable support to those it serves, yet the breaking news indicates a pivotal shift – a reduction in the amount of milk allocated to participants.  

“To the dismay of numerous stakeholders in our dairy sector, these updates to the WIC program shed a spotlight on a trend of cutbacks in milk provisions, paving a critical pathway for an in-depth look into the repercussions of such policy decisions.”

During the fiscal year of 2023, participation in the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) spiked to approximately 6.6 million mothers and children. The program, known for offering its beneficiaries the ability to purchase a range of foods based on their age and nutritional requirements, has recently announced some significant changes, set to go into effect within two years. 

While these alterations aim to enhance the support for families purchasing fruits and vegetables, they conversely reduce the amount of financial aid provided for the purchase of milk. Moving forward, the updated WIC program will provide merely 3 gallons of milk per month for toddlers, a reduction from the initial allotment of 4 gallons. Similarly, the supply for children ages 2 to 4 has been reduced to 3.5 gallons from 4 gallons. Mothers who are entirely breastfeeding will now receive only 4 gallons every month, a cut from their previously set monthly maximum of 6 gallons. 

A silver lining to these regulatory shifts is that lactose-free milk can now be purchased using the funds allocated through the program. The WIC program will also increase the range of options available to beneficiaries for purchasing yogurt and cheese products, provided in various package sizes. However, the new rule also permits the use of WIC dollars to buy plant-based alternatives, not as nutrient-dense as dairy milk. 

The news has sparked responses from several dairy organizations, including the National Milk Producers Federation (NMPF) and the International Dairy Foods Association (IDFA). “NMPF is unsettled by the decision to reduce access to the essential nutrients dairy adds to the diet,” said Gregg Doud, NMPF President and CEO. 

According to a New York Times article, the USDA defended its reform by stating that the previous milk allocation was a massive 128% of the daily amount required by nutrition guidelines. The new amount now aligns to 71% to 96% of the recommended intake, based on these guidelines.

A poll by IDFA among WIC participants revealed that 35% would need to dip into their pockets to cover the cost of milk and dairy purchases due to these cuts. A further 33% of respondents expressed beliefs that the cuts will make shopping for milk and dairy items more challenging. Dairy producers are alarmed by these results – nutritious dairy products should be easy to access, not the reverse. 

“In this era of escalating food costs, it’s crucial to shift focus on broadening access to a diverse variety of healthy, nutrient-dense, and affordable foods, including dairy products,” stated Doud. “It’s disheartening to see the final rule constraining WIC families’ purchasing power for nutritious dairy foods.”

The H5N1 strain of Avian Influenza-commonly known as bird flu-has been making significant strides into domestic territories, sparking concern among scientists and public health officials. Over the past two years, the virus has been circulating among wild migratory birds, with substantial spillover into poultry farms. However, the recent discovery of the virus in dairy cows and the subsequent infection of a dairy farm employee—the second person in America so far—has raised eyebrows in the scientific community. As of now, the virus has spread to 16 herds across six states, according to the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), raising fear regarding potential further transmission to humans. 

Johns Hopkins Public Health experts, however, suggest that though the virus is now seen circulating among dairy cows, the risk of human exposure still remains quite low.

Avian Flu Q&A with Professionals 

Stephanie Desmon from Public Health on Call held an enlightening Q&A on April 8, speaking with Meghan Davis, an Associate Professor in the Department of Environmental Health and Engineering, and Andrew Pekosz, a Professor in the Department of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology. They discussed the bird flu’s jump between species, its pandemic potential, and the impact of the virus appearing in the dairy industry. 

What’s Going on With the Avian Flu? 

According to Pekosz, the virus’s increased activity in the last couple of years is of concern. It’s been mutating over time and has seen an alarming spike in incidences of infecting wild birds. This in turn has led to increased spillover infections into poultry farms and other mammals, including skunks, bears, and foxes who presumably contracted the virus by feeding on dead infected birds. Alarmingly, the virus has also recently spilled over into dairy cows. 

Was the H5N1 Outbreak Unexpected? 

Davis expressed surprise that the outbreak has reached dairy cows, as when it comes to animal models for influenza, mustelids such as ferrets or mink are generally considered. The surprising part about seeing H5N1 in dairy is that researchers have not typically focused on biosecurity and biocontainment for viruses like Avian Influenza, which is typically transmitted from bird reservoirs. As a potentially consequential symptom of disease, some infected cows stop eating or milking well, though there’s no report of high mortality yet. 

Is the Consumed Milk Safe? 

There’s no substantial evidence suggesting concern for the average person consuming commercial milk. If the milk is pasteurized and procured from a commercial dairy processor, the risk is extremely low. Davis advises strongly against the consumption of raw milk products due to the associated risks. 

What Can We Learn From Infected Cows? 

The infection pattern in cows tells us two important things, as per Pekosz. First, the virus, upon entering a new host, has traveled beyond the respiratory tract and made it all the way into the milk. This suggests something unique about the H5N1 virus in contrast to common human strains. Second, if the virus transmits from cow to cow, it indicates the virus is adapting and becoming better fit to spread in cows. This information is critical in understanding the virus’s potential to infect humans and how the sequence of the virus changes. 

What About the Transmission Among Cows? 

Davis brings attention to the way cows are frequently moved and swapped in the dairy industry, and the potential need to educate farmers about this if it poses a risk of introducing bird flu. And Pekosz suggests that contaminated milking equipment could contribute to the virus spread, as the amount of virus in the milk is much greater than in the cow’s nose. Hence, instituting equipment disinfection protocols could slow or stop the virus spread. 

Is Avian Flu a Major Threat at This Time? 

Pekosz admits that H5N1 does pose a pandemic potential. As humans have very little inherent immunity against H5 viruses, there could be massive increases in the number of cases if the virus enters and starts to spread among humans. 

For the average person, Davis suggests simply being aware of the situation and avoiding things like raw milk products. Moreover, since the possibility of disease in cats has been observed, it’s a good idea to limit your cats’ contact with wild birds. 

Michigan is facing an increased threat from Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza (HPAI) according to an announcement from the state’s Department of Agriculture and Rural Development. The director, Tim Boring, shared this sobering update, revealing three additional dairy herds infected with this dangerous virus, raising the total impacted counties to four. It was only on March 29 that the state’s first HPAI-positive dairy herd was confirmed in Montcalm County. 

This concerning development was confirmed by the U.S. Department of Agriculture‘s National Veterinary Services Laboratory on the evening of April 11. Despite the understandable concern this may cause, it’s important for Michigan residents to know that the commercial milk supply remains safe. 

The safety of commercial milk has not been compromised, thanks to federal animal health requirements including necessary pasteurization. Federal experts maintain this step effectively ensures the safety of our milk, with no increased risk posed directly to public health. An encouraging result from analyses of the detected virus indicates no alarming adaptation that makes it more transmissible between mammals, keeping the public health risk associated with HPAI low.

In Michigan, pasteurization of milk sold in stores is a requirement by state law; a process continually proven to disarm bacteria and viruses present in milk, including influenza. This precaution further reinforces the safety of milk for consumers. 

State Veterinarian Dr. Nora Wineland underscores the importance of collaboration with veterinarians for a successful recovery of affected dairy cows and urges a limitation on farm visitors. Dairies are also greatly advised to step up biosecurity measures, such as: 

• Limiting farm access to employees and essential personnel
• Adhering to best management practices
• Frequent hand washing

Additional measures can be found through Secure Milk Supply. HPAI is known for its high contagiousness among birds and poultry, it can be spread directly from infected wild creatures or indirectly through exposed items like equipment, feed, or even the clothing and shoes of caretakers. If you are a producer with concerns for your animals’ health, or in need of advice on safeguarding their health, contact your veterinarian as soon as possible.